I

骨坏死
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:在美国患者样本中评估膀胱切除术前后膀胱癌的直接和间接成本。方法:回顾性分析,使用MarketScan商业索赔与接触以及健康与生产力管理数据库对去识别的膀胱癌患者进行观察性分析.2015年10月1日至12月31日(膀胱切除术日期=索引日期),连续入组6个月前(基线)和索引后(随访)的成年膀胱癌患者加上≥1例膀胱部分切除术或根治性膀胱切除术的申请。在6个月的基线和随访期内,评估了与短期和长期残疾(STD和LTD)雇主索赔相关的所有原因的总医疗保健费用和间接成本。结果:该研究包括N=142例患者;平均年龄56±6岁,76%(男性),42%的患者基线Deyo-Charlson合并症指数≥2。基线平均全因直接医疗总费用为51,473美元±48,560美元(中位数:36,202美元),随访期间为$99,524±86,839(中位数:$75,444)。在基线,32%的患者有≥1次性病报告,相当于每位患者平均损失134±303小时和总支付2,353±6,445美元。随访性病索赔增加了23.4%,相当于每位患者平均损失218±324小时和$3,679±$7,795。患者LTD索赔从基线到随访增加(1%到3%),膀胱切除术后LTD索赔导致574±490小时损失,和1,636美元±1,429美元的总付款。超过85%的人有膀胱切除术相关的并发症,最常见的是泌尿生殖相关(47.9%)和感染/脓毒症(33.1%).结论:膀胱切除术与并发症和术后工作效率降低有关。研究结果可能有助于告知有关膀胱切除术和膀胱切除术的决定膀胱保存方法,并强调了在膀胱癌治疗领域进一步开发膀胱保留疗法的持续需求。
    UNASSIGNED: To estimate the direct and indirect costs of bladder cancer prior to and following cystectomy in a U.S. sample of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, observational analysis of de-identified patients with bladder cancer utilized the MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and Health & Productivity Management databases. Adult patients with bladder cancer plus ≥ 1 claim for partial or radical cystectomy between 1 October 2015 and 31 December 2020 (date of the cystectomy = index date) and who were continuously enrolled for 6 months pre- (baseline) and post-index (follow-up) were included in the sample. All-cause total healthcare costs and indirect costs associated with short-term and long-term disability (STD and LTD) employer claims were assessed during each of the 6-month baseline and follow-up periods.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included N = 142 patients; mean age 56 ± 6 years, 76% (male), and 42% had a baseline Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2. Baseline mean total all-cause direct healthcare costs were $51,473 ± $48,560 (median: $36,202), and $99,524 ± 86,839 (median: $75,444) during follow-up. At baseline, 32% of patients had ≥ 1 STD claim, equating to a mean 134 ± 303 h lost and $2,353 ± $6,445 in total payments per patient. Follow up STD claims increased 23.4% equating to a mean 218 ± 324 h lost and $3,679 ± $7,795 per patient. Patient LTD claims increased from baseline to follow-up (1-3%), with post-cystectomy LTD claims resulting in 574 ± 490 h lost, and $1,636 ± $1,429 in total payments. Over 85% of the population had a cystectomy related complication, the most common were genitourinary-related (47.9%) and infection/sepsis (33.1%).
    UNASSIGNED: Cystectomy was associated with complications and decreased work productivity post-surgery. Findings may aid to inform decisions regarding cystectomy vs. bladder preservation approaches, and underscores an ongoing need to further develop bladder preservation therapies within the bladder cancer treatment landscape.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:次优治疗指标,包括治疗开关,在克罗恩病(CD)患者中很常见,但对其相关的医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本知之甚少。这项研究评估了次优治疗指标对新接受一线生物制剂治疗的CD成人HRU和成本的影响。方法:在IBM®MarketScan®商业子集(10/01/2015-03/31/2020)中确定患有CD的成年患者。索引日期被定义为一线生物制剂的开始,研究期间定义为指数日期后的12个月。根据在研究期间观察到的次优治疗指标,将患者分为次优治疗和最佳治疗组。将具有治疗切换的次优治疗队列中的患者分类为治疗切换队列,并与没有治疗切换的患者进行比较。在研究期间测量了全因HRU和费用,并评估了治疗欠佳和最佳治疗的患者以及无治疗转换的患者。结果:该研究包括4,006例患者(次优治疗:2,091例,最佳治疗:1,915例)。治疗切换是次优治疗的常见指标(治疗切换:640,无治疗切换:3,366)。HRU和费用在治疗欠佳的患者中明显高于治疗最佳的患者(年度费用:92,043美元vs73,764美元;p<0.01),在那些有治疗开关的人中,没有治疗开关的人(年费用:95,689美元对81,027美元;p<0.01)。次优治疗指标数量的增加与成本增加有关。局限性:索赔数据用于根据观察到的治疗模式确定次优治疗指标;无法评估治疗决策的原因。结论:本研究表明,治疗指标欠佳的患者,包括治疗开关,与接受最佳治疗的患者和未转换治疗的患者相比,HRU和费用要高得多。
    UNASSIGNED: Suboptimal treatment indicators, including treatment switch, are common among patients with Crohn\'s disease (CD), but little is known about their associated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. This study assessed the impact of suboptimal treatment indicators on HRU and costs among adults with CD newly treated with a first-line biologic.
    UNASSIGNED: Adult patients with CD were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Subset (10/01/2015-03/31/2020). The index date was defined as initiation of the first-line biologic, and the study period was defined as the 12 months following the index date. Patients were classified into Suboptimal Treatment and Optimal Treatment cohorts based on observed indicators of suboptimal treatment during the study period. Patients in the Suboptimal Treatment Cohort with a treatment switch were classified into the Treatment Switch Cohort and compared to patients with no treatment switch. All-cause HRU and costs were measured during the study period and assessed for patients with suboptimal vs optimal treatment and patients with vs without a treatment switch.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 4,006 patients (Suboptimal Treatment: 2,091, Optimal Treatment: 1,915). Treatment switch was a common indicator of suboptimal treatment (Treatment Switch: 640, No Treatment Switch: 3,366). HRU and costs were significantly higher among patients with suboptimal treatment than those with optimal treatment (annual costs: $92,043 vs $73,764; p < 0.01), and among those with a treatment switch than those with no treatment switch (annual costs: $95,689 vs $81,027; p < 0.01). Increases in the number of suboptimal treatment indicators were associated with increased costs.
    UNASSIGNED: Claims data were used to identify suboptimal treatment indicators based on observed treatment patterns; reasons for treatment decisions could not be assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates that patients with suboptimal treatment indicators, including treatment switch, incur substantially higher HRU and costs compared to patients receiving optimal treatment and those that do not switch treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了描述2型糖尿病(T2D)成年患者开始注射胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)治疗后的医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)和相关成本,观察,在法国进行24个月的Trophies学习,德国,和意大利。
    HCRU的成本计算数据是在GLP-1RA开始服用每周一次杜拉鲁肽或每天一次利拉鲁肽后约6、12、18和24个月的基线和随访访视期间由治疗医师收集的。从国家医疗系统(第三方付款人)的角度评估了成本,并更新到2018年的价格。
    总共,2,005例患者符合HCRU分析的条件(1,014杜拉鲁肽;991利拉鲁肽)。治疗组和国家之间的基线患者特征通常相似。在基线(42.9-43.4%)和第24个月(44.0-45.1%)使用≥2种口服降糖药物(GLM)和在第24个月(15.3-23.2%)使用另一种可注射GLM的患者比例最大的是法国。在每个评估期间,法国(范围=4.0-10.7)和德国(范围=2.9-5.7)的初级和二级医疗保健接触者的平均人数最高,分别。每位患者平均年化成本的最大比例(≥60%)包括药物成本。每位患者的平均年度HCRU费用因治疗队列和国家而异:最高水平是法国的利拉鲁肽队列(909欧元)和德国的杜拉鲁肽队列(883欧元)。
    限制包括排除在GLP-1RA启动时使用胰岛素的患者,以及由医生收集HCRU数据,不是通过病人完成的日记。
    现实世界中的HCRU和与T2D成人治疗相关的成本在《财富》中使用两个GLP-1RA强调,在评估特定国家/地区的新疗法的影响时,需要避免对HCRU和与特定疗法相关的成本进行概括。
    胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)已成为2型糖尿病(T2D)中高血糖症的常用治疗方法。并非所有类型的临床研究都提供有关这些治疗的成本或它们可能对使用其他药物和设备来控制T2D或需要去看医生或护士以及在医院接受不同类型治疗的影响的信息。这项研究在法国成年人的常规护理中收集了这些信息,德国,或意大利,他们的家庭医生或T2D专家开了杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽(两种类型的GLP-1RA)。在这三个国家中,使用杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽的人与使用相同GLP-1RA的人之间的成本以及对其他药物和医疗服务的需求存在差异。这项研究的信息可用于更准确地了解患者在法国使用杜拉鲁肽或利拉鲁肽时所需的总成本和医疗护理,德国,或者意大利。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs after initiation of injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy by adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the prospective, observational, 24-month TROPHIES study in France, Germany, and Italy.
    UNASSIGNED: HCRU data for cost calculations were collected by treating physicians during patient interviews at baseline and follow-up visits approximately 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after GLP-1 RA initiation with once-weekly dulaglutide or once-daily liraglutide. Costs were evaluated from the national healthcare system (third-party payer) perspective and updated to 2018 prices.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 2,005 patients were eligible for the HCRU analysis (1,014 dulaglutide; 991 liraglutide). Baseline patient characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups and countries. The largest proportions of patients using ≥2 oral glucose-lowering medications (GLMs) at baseline (42.9-43.4%) and month 24 (44.0-45.1%) and using another injectable GLM at month 24 (15.3-23.2%) were in France. Mean numbers of primary and secondary healthcare contacts during each assessment period were highest in France (range = 4.0-10.7) and Germany (range = 2.9-5.7), respectively. The greatest proportions (≥60%) of mean annualized costs per patient comprised medication costs. Mean annualized HCRU costs per patient varied by treatment cohort and country: the highest levels were in the liraglutide cohort in France (€909) and the dulaglutide cohort in Germany (€883).
    UNASSIGNED: Limitations included exclusion of patients using insulin at GLP-1 RA initiation and collection of HCRU data by physician, not via patient-completed diaries.
    UNASSIGNED: Real-world HCRU and costs associated with the treatment of adults with T2D with two GLP-1 RAs in TROPHIES emphasize the need to avoid generalization with respect to HCRU and costs associated with a particular therapy when estimating the impact of a new treatment in a country-specific setting.
    Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become frequent treatments of hyperglycemia in type-2 diabetes (T2D). Not all types of clinical study provide information about the cost of these treatments or the effects they might have on use of other medicines and equipment to control T2D or the need for visits to a doctor or nurse and different types of treatment in hospital. This study collected this information during the regular care of adults in France, Germany, or Italy who were prescribed either dulaglutide or liraglutide (both types of GLP-1 RAs) by their family doctor or a specialist in T2D. There were differences in costs and the need for other medicines and medical services between people using either dulaglutide or liraglutide and for people who were using the same GLP-1 RA in each of the three countries. The information from this study could be used to more accurately understand the overall costs and medical care needed when patients use dulaglutide or liraglutide in France, Germany, or Italy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:具有RESILIA组织的生物假体在临床前和临床研究中显示出钙化减少并改善健康结果。先前的经济分析依赖于COMMENCE试验的五年证据,表明在手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)后,相对于机械瓣膜,RESILIA组织瓣膜可以节省财务。鉴于最近发布的7年COMMENCE数据,这项经济评估更新了RESILIA生物人工瓣膜长期节省的估计.方法:模拟模型估计了两个假设的SAVR队列中的疾病进展(组织与机械)在美国每个10,000名患者。主要比较计算了与每种瓣膜类型相关的SAVR相关支出(美元,2023年)。健康结果概率基于第7年的COMMENCE试验,并根据组织和机械SAVR的先前研究预计再延长8年。关键结果的成本(死亡率,再操作,出血,血栓栓塞,心内膜炎)和抗凝监测来自文献。与机械瓣膜相关的健康结果的发生率依赖于组织瓣膜与机械瓣膜患者的相对风险。结果:比较RESILIA与机械SAVR时,每位患者的七年节省为$13,415(95%CI:$10,472-$17,321)。预计15年的节省为23,001美元(美元,2023年;95%CI:17802美元-30421美元)。15年的大部分节省主要归因于较低的抗凝监测成本(15年ACM节省21,073美元),但较低的出血成本(节省:2,294美元)和与血栓栓塞相关的支出(节省:852美元)也有贡献.在RESILIA队列中,再手术和心内膜炎的支出略大。如果在第7年后再次手术相对风险从1.1恢复到2.2(传统组织瓣膜的水平),则节省18,064美元。RESILIASAVR相对于传统组织瓣膜也降低了成本。结论:与机械和传统组织瓣膜相比,接受RESILIA组织瓣膜的患者预计具有较低的SAVR相关健康支出。
    UNASSIGNED: Bioprostheses with RESILIA tissue demonstrate a reduction in calcification and improve health outcomes in pre-clinical and clinical studies. Prior economic analyses which relied on 5 years of evidence from the COMMENCE trial demonstrate financial savings for RESILIA tissue valves relative to mechanical valves after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Given the recent release of 7-year COMMENCE data, this economic evaluation updates the estimate for long-run savings of bioprosthetic valves with RESILIA.
    UNASSIGNED: Simulation models estimated disease progression across two hypothetical SAVR cohorts (tissue vs. mechanical) of 10,000 patients each in the US. The primary comparison calculated the SAVR-related expenditures associated with each valve type ($US, 2023). Health outcome probabilities were based on the COMMENCE trial though year 7 and projected for an additional 8 years based on prior studies of tissue and mechanical SAVR. Costs for key outcomes (mortality, reoperation, bleeding, thromboembolism, endocarditis) and anticoagulant monitoring were sourced from the literature. Incidence rates of health outcomes associated with mechanical valves relied on relative risks of tissue valve versus mechanical valve patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Seven-year savings are $13,415 (95% CI = $10,472-$17,321) per patient when comparing RESILIA versus mechanical SAVR. Projected 15-year savings were $23,001 ($US, 2023; 95% CI = $17,802-$30,421). Most of the 15-year savings are primarily attributed to lower anti-coagulation monitoring costs ($21,073 in ACM savings over 15 years), but lower bleeding cost (savings: $2,294) and thromboembolism-related expenditures (savings: $852) also contribute. Reoperation and endocarditis expenditures were slightly larger in the RESILIA cohort. If reoperation relative risk reverts from 1.1 to 2.2 (the level in legacy tissue valves) after year 7, savings are $18,064. RESILIA SAVR also reduce costs relative to legacy tissue valves.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients receiving RESILIA tissue valves are projected to have lower SAVR-related health expenditures relative to mechanical and legacy tissue valves.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究比较了准备时间,错误,满意,在一项随机研究中,与两种需要重建的RSV疫苗(VRR1和VRR2)相比,单盲时间和运动研究。方法:药剂师,护士,和药学技术人员被随机分配到三种疫苗的制备顺序。参与者阅读说明,然后连续制备三种疫苗,其间有3至5分钟的洗脱期。由训练有素的药剂师对准备时间和错误进行视频记录和审查,使用预定义,疫苗特异性检查表。参与者的人口统计,对疫苗制备的满意度,并记录疫苗偏好。受试者内方差分析用于比较准备时间。混合效应泊松和有序逻辑回归模型用于比较准备错误的数量和满意度得分,分别。结果:63名药师(60%),护士(35%)和药学技术人员(5%)参加了美国四个地点的活动。PFS的每个剂量的最小二乘平均准备时间比VRR1快141.8秒(95%CI:156.8,126.7;p<0.0001),比VRR2快103.6秒(118.7,88.5;p<0.0001),比合并的VRR快122.7秒(95%CI:134.2,111.2;p<0.0001)。PFS的总体满意度(“非常”和“非常”)为87.3%,VRR1为28.6%,VRR2为47.6%。大多数参与者(81.0%)更喜欢PFS疫苗。局限性:这项研究由于无法完全失明的观察者而受到限制。为了尽量减少秩序的影响,我们使用了3序列块设计,然而,疫苗的制备顺序可能影响结局.参与者被评估一次,而如果进行重复制备,则每种疫苗的训练效率可能会提高。结论:PFS疫苗可以大大简化疫苗制备过程,允许管理员每小时准备的剂量几乎是小瓶和注射器系统的四倍。
    UNASSIGNED: The current study compared preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference for a prefilled syringe (PFS) versus two RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution (VRR1 and VRR2) in a randomized, single-blinded time and motion study.
    UNASSIGNED: Pharmacists, nurses, and pharmacy technicians were randomized to a preparation sequence of the three vaccines. Participants read instructions, then consecutively prepared the three vaccines with a 3-5-min washout period in between. Preparations were video recorded and reviewed by a trained pharmacist for preparation time and errors using predefined, vaccine-specific checklists. Participant demographics, satisfaction with vaccine preparation, and vaccine preference were recorded. Within-subjects analysis of variance was used to compare preparation time. Mixed-effects Poisson and ordered logistic regression models were used to compare the number of preparation errors and satisfaction scores, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty-three pharmacists (60%), nurses (35%), and pharmacy technicians (5%) participated at four sites in the United States. The least squares mean preparation time per dose for PFS was 141.8 s (95% CI = 156.8-126.7; p <.0001) faster than for VRR1, 103.6 s (95% CI = 118.7-88.5; p <.0001) faster than for VRR2, and 122.7 s (95% CI = 134.2-111.2; p <.0001) faster than the pooled VRRs. Overall satisfaction (combined \"Very\" and \"Extremely\") was 87.3% for PFS, 28.6% for VRR1, and 47.6% for VRR2. Most participants (81.0%) preferred the PFS vaccine.
    UNASSIGNED: The study is limited by the inability to completely blind observers. To minimize the effects of order, we utilized a 3-sequence block design; however, the order in which the vaccines were prepared may have affected outcomes. Participants were assessed once, whereas if repeated preparations were performed there may have been trained efficiencies gained for each vaccine.
    UNASSIGNED: PFS vaccines can greatly simplify the vaccine preparation process, allowing administrators to prepare almost four times more doses per hour than with vial and syringe systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于心脏骤停(SCA)一级预防(PP)的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)在发展中国家未得到充分利用。改善SCA研究已经确定了1.5个一级预防(1.5PP)患者的子集,这些患者具有较高的SCA风险和ICD治疗的显着死亡率益处。从中国医疗体系的角度来看,我们评估了ICD治疗的成本效益与不对1.5PP患者进行ICD治疗,以告知临床和政策决定.
    对已发布的马尔可夫模型进行了调整和验证,以模拟疾病的病程并描述1.5PP患者的不同健康状况。病人的特点,死亡率,效用和并发症的估计来自改善SCA研究和其他文献.成本投入来自政府投标价格,中国9家公立医院的医疗服务价格和临床专家调查。对于ICD和无ICD治疗,对整个生命周期内的总医疗费用和质量调整生命年(QALYs)进行建模,并计算增量成本-效果比(ICER).进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析以评估模型参数的不确定性。我们使用中国药物经济学评价指南推荐的支付意愿(WTP)阈值,2022年是中国人均GDP的一到三倍(85,698-257,094元人民币)。
    与没有ICD治疗相比,ICD治疗的增量成本效益比(ICER)为139,652CNY/QALY,这大约是中国人均GDP的1-2倍。ICD治疗具有成本效益的概率为92.1%。敏感性分析的结果支持基本案例的发现。
    ICD治疗与没有ICD治疗相比,对于中国的1.5PP患者来说是具有成本效益的。
    UNASSIGNED: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs) for primary prevention (PP) of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is underutilized in developing countries. The Improve SCA study has identified a subset of 1.5 primary prevention (1.5PP) patients with a higher risk of SCA and a significant mortality benefit from ICD therapy. From the perspective of China\'s healthcare system, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy vs. no ICD therapy among 1.5PP patients with a view to informing clinical and policy decisions.
    UNASSIGNED: A published Markov model was adjusted and verified to simulate the course of the disease and describe different health states of 1.5PP patients. The patient characteristics, mortality, utility and complication estimates were obtained from the Improve SCA study and other literature. Cost inputs were sourced from government tender prices, medical service prices and clinical experts\' surveys in 9 Chinese public hospitals. For both ICD and no ICD therapy, the total medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were modelled over a lifetime horizon and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model parameters. We used the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold recommended by China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations, one to three times China\'s GDP per capita (CNY85,698-CNY257,094) in 2022 Chinese Yuan.
    UNASSIGNED: The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is 139,652 CNY/QALY, which is about 1-2 times China\'s GDP per capita. The probability that ICD therapy is cost effective was 92.1%. Results from sensitivity analysis supported the findings of the base case.
    UNASSIGNED: ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is cost-effective for the 1.5PP patients in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在检验EQ-5D-5L在马来西亚HFrEF患者中的有效性,并探讨三种主要语言版本的测量对等。方法:我们调查了马来西亚两家医院的HFrEF患者,使用马来语,英文或中文版本的EQ-5D-5L。使用马来西亚值集将EQ-5D-5L维度得分转换为效用得分。建立了验证性因子分析纵向模型。对效用和视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分进行有效性评估(收敛,已知组,响应能力),三种语言版本的测量等效性。结果:200例HFrEF患者(平均年龄=61岁),主要是男性(74%)的马来人(55%),在马来人中完成了入学和出院EQ-5D-5L问卷(49%),英语(26%)或汉语(25%)。出院后1个月(1MPD)随访173例(86.5%)。所提取的标准化因子载荷和平均方差≥0.5,而复合信度≥0.7,表明收敛效度。年龄较大且纽约心脏协会(NYHA)等级较高的患者的效用和VAS评分明显较低。入院和出院之间的效用和VAS分数变化很大,而放电和1MPD之间的变化很小。效用和VAS评分的最小临床重要差异分别为±0.19和±11.01。马来语和英语问卷是等效的,而马来语和汉语问卷的等效性尚无定论。局限性:本研究仅对来自两家教学医院的HFrEF患者进行采样,因此限制了结果对整个心力衰竭人群的普适性。结论:EQ-5D-5L是测量马来西亚HFrEF患者健康相关生活质量和估计效用值的有效问卷。EQ-5D-5L的马来语和英语版本在临床和经济评估中似乎是等效的。
    EQ-5D是临床试验和健康技术评估中最常用的用于衡量患者健康相关生活质量的问卷。为了提高对临床试验结果的信心,即心力衰竭干预措施可改善与健康相关的生活质量和质量调整后的生命年数(与健康相关的生活质量等效的生存年数),用于测量健康相关生活质量的问卷需要在特定人群中进行验证.由于EQ-5D-5L尚未在马来西亚射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)人群中得到验证,这项研究评估了马来西亚HFrEF患者中EQ-5D-5L的心理测量特性(有效性)以及不同语言版本的等效性(即马来语,中文和英文)的EQ-5D-5L在测量与健康相关的生活质量中。研究结果表明,EQ-5D-5L是测量HFrEF患者健康相关生活质量并估计质量调整生命年的有效问卷。EQ-5D-5L的马来语和英语版本似乎等同于用于临床试验和健康技术评估。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to examine the validity of EQ-5D-5L among HFrEF patients in Malaysia, and to explore the measurement equivalence of three main language versions.
    UNASSIGNED: We surveyed HFrEF patients from two hospitals in Malaysia, using Malay, English or Chinese versions of EQ-5D-5L. EQ-5D-5L dimensional scores were converted to utility scores using the Malaysian value set. A confirmatory factor analysis longitudinal model was constructed. The utility and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated for validity (convergent, known-group, responsiveness), and measurement equivalence of the three language versions.
    UNASSIGNED: 200 HFrEF patients (mean age = 61 years), predominantly male (74%) of Malay ethnicity (55%), completed the admission and discharge EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in Malay (49%), English (26%) or Chinese (25%) languages. 173 patients (86.5%) were followed up at 1-month post-discharge (1MPD). The standardized factor loadings and average variance extracted were ≥ 0.5 while composite reliability was ≥ 0.7, suggesting convergent validity. Patients with older age and higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class reported significantly lower utility and VAS scores. The change in utility and VAS scores between admission and discharge was large, while the change between discharge and 1MPD was minimal. The minimal clinically important difference for utility and VAS scores was ±0.19 and ±11.01, respectively. Malay and English questionnaire were equivalent while the equivalence of Malay and Chinese questionnaire was inconclusive.
    UNASSIGNED: This study only sampled HFrEF patients from two teaching hospitals, thus limiting the generalizability of results to the entire heart failure population.
    UNASSIGNED: EQ-5D-5L is a valid questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life and estimate utility values among HFrEF patients in Malaysia. The Malay and English versions of EQ-5D-5L appear equivalent for clinical and economic assessments.
    EQ-5D is the most commonly used questionnaire to measure patients’ health-related quality of life in clinical trials and health technology assessments. To increase confidence over clinical trial findings that heart failure interventions improve health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life years (number of years alive with equivalence health-related quality of life), the questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life needs to be validated in the specific population. Since EQ-5D-5L has not been validated in Malaysia’s heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) population, this study evaluated the psychometric properties (validity) of EQ-5D-5L among HFrEF patients in Malaysia and the equivalence of different versions of languages (i.e. Malay, Chinese and English) of EQ-5D-5L in measuring the health-related quality of life. The findings suggested that EQ-5D-5L is a valid questionnaire to measure the health-related quality of life in HFrEF patients and estimate the quality-adjusted life years. The Malay and English versions of EQ-5D-5L appear to be equivalent for use in clinical trials and health technology assessments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目标:波生坦,ambrisentan,和Macitentan是内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA),目前在澳大利亚可用于治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)。这项研究评估了澳大利亚患者中这些ERA对PAH的比较依从性。方法:回顾性分析,观察性研究使用来自澳大利亚服务部门10%药物福利计划(PBS)数据集(2006年01月10日-2020年10月10日)的成人PAH患者数据.主要结果是治疗依从性(即,在12个月内接受≥80%的ERA剂量)。次要结果是治疗改变时间(添加或切换)和总生存期。结果:该研究包括436例服用波生坦的患者(n=200),ambrisentan(n=69),或Macitentan(n=167)。接受马西坦(65.3%)的患者的治疗依从性明显高于安布生坦(56.5%)和波生坦(58.0%),波生坦与马西坦的比值比(OR;95%CI)为0.51(0.30-0.88;P=0.016),安博生坦与马西坦的比值比为0.48(0.24-0.96;P=0.037)。Bosentan和ambrisentan的中位治疗时间分别为47.2和43.4个月,分别(由于数据持续时间不足,未计算Macitentan)。局限性和结论:澳大利亚PAH患者的实际数据表明,ERA的治疗依从性欠佳。与ambrisentan和Bosentan相比,Macitentan的依从性更高。
    UNASSIGNED: Bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan are endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), currently available in Australia for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study assessed the comparative adherence of these ERAs for PAH in Australian patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, observational study used data for adults with PAH from the Services Australia 10% Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset (01/2006-10/2020). The primary outcome was treatment adherence (i.e. receiving ≥80% of ERA doses over 12 months). Secondary outcomes were time to treatment change (add-on or switch) and overall survival.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 436 patients who took bosentan (n = 200), ambrisentan (n = 69), or macitentan (n = 167). Treatment adherence was significantly greater in patients who received macitentan (65.3%) versus ambrisentan (56.5%) and bosentan (58.0%), with odds ratios (ORs; 95% CI) of 0.51 (0.30-0.88; p = 0.016) for bosentan versus macitentan and 0.48 (0.24-0.96; p = 0.037) for ambrisentan versus macitentan. The median time to treatment change was 47.2 and 43.4 months for bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively (not calculated for macitentan because of insufficient duration of data).
    UNASSIGNED: Real-world data for Australian patients with PAH showed that treatment adherence for ERAs was suboptimal. Adherence was higher for macitentan compared with ambrisentan and bosentan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    苏丹终末期肾病(ESRD)的发病率正在增加,影响患者的经济状况,照顾者和社会。本研究旨在衡量ESRD的成本,包括直接和间接支出,并调查任何相关因素和财务后果。
    这项横断面研究使用标准化问卷收集了150名ESRD患者的数据,这些患者在喀土穆州13个专门的肾脏中心收集数据之前已经接受透析至少一年。关于社会人口统计学的数据,临床,收集了经济因素,并使用单变量双变量检查了它们与ESRD成本的关系(曼·惠特尼检验,KruskalWallis检验和Spearman相关性)和多变量分析程序(多变量线性回归)。
    本研究报告,人均ESRD直接成本中位数为每年38600SDG(1723.2PPP),四分位数范围为69319.3SDG(3094.6PPP)。间接成本中位数估计为每年0.0±3352SDG(0.0±149.6PPP)。在28.8%的病例中,这些患者是他们家庭的主要收入来源,超过85%的患者有医疗保险。研究表明,ESRD总费用与年住院率之间存在显着关联(P值=0.001),以及总ESRD成本和平均住院时间之间的差异(P值=0.005)。我们的研究发现,没有一个研究变量与ESRD的总成本显着相关。
    我们的研究结果指出,患者及其家庭的直接自付费用和生产力损失相当大。然而,由于医疗干预费用和保险范围的差异,这些结果应仔细应用于不同国家之间的比较.建议对健康财务和保险政策进行进一步的纵向研究和研究。
    随着苏丹医疗费用的不断上涨,本研究旨在从患者的角度评估与终末期肾病(ESRD)相关的直接和间接成本.关于疾病成本(COI)的准确信息有助于政策制定者优先考虑医疗保健服务和资源,优化公众福祉,并确定卫生政策的有效性。未来的研究应包括纵向设计,并从护理人员和医疗保健提供者的角度了解ESRD成本。
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Sudan is increasing, affecting the economic status of patients, caregivers and society. This study aimed to measure ESRD\'s costs, including direct and morbidity indirect expenditures, and to investigate any associated factors and financial consequences.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study used a standardized questionnaire to collect data from 150 ESRD patients who had been receiving dialysis for at least one year before the time of data collection at 13 specialized renal centres in Khartoum state. Data about sociodemographic, clinical, and economic factors were gathered, and their relationship to the cost of ESRD was examined using both bivariate (Man Whitney test, Kruskal Wallis test and Spearman correlation) and multivariate analytical procedures (multivariate linear regression).
    UNASSIGNED: This study reported a median direct per capita ESRD cost of 38 600 SDG ($1 723.2 PPP) annually with an interquartile range of 69 319.3 SDG ($3 094.6 PPP). The median morbidity indirect cost was estimated to be 0.0 ± 3 352 SDG ($ 0.0 ± 149.6 PPP) per annum. In 28.8% of cases, the patients were their family\'s primary income earner and over 85% were covered by medical insurance. Our study found that none of the study variables were significantly associated with the total cost of ESRD.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings point out considerable direct out-of-pocket expenses and productivity losses for patients and their households. However, these results should be carefully applied for comparison between the different countries due to differences in the cost of medical interventions and insurance coverage. Further longitudinal studies and studies on health finance and insurance policies are recommended.
    As medical care costs continue to rise in Sudan, this study aimed to estimate direct and indirect costs associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from the patient’s perspective. Accurate information on the cost of illness (COI) helps policymakers prioritize healthcare services and resources, optimize public well-being, and determine health policy effectiveness. Future research should include a longitudinal design and understand ESRD costs from caregivers’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:本研究评估了治疗模式,医疗保健资源利用(HRU),成本,在中国,转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)和非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)的年患病率和发病率。方法:使用2014年1月至2021年3月中国三家三级医院的前列腺癌患者的电子病历(EMR)进行回顾性研究。描述性统计用于分析研究结果。结果:总的来说,包括1086例mHSPC患者和679例nmCRPC患者。从2015年到2020年,mHSPC的流行和事件病例的年度百分比从22.4%下降到20.0%,从11.1%下降到6.9%,分别用于nmCRPC,从3.8%上升到13.6%,从3.3%上升到8.4%。雄激素剥夺治疗和第一代抗雄激素药物(比卡鲁胺或氟他胺)是mHSPC患者基线和随访时最常用的前列腺癌相关药物。在nmCRPC患者随访期间,比卡鲁胺是最常用的前列腺癌相关药物。对于mHSPC,住院费用最高,每人每月的中位数(四分位数范围)成本为403.00美元(85.50-1226.20美元),而nmCRPC的门诊就诊费用最高(372.60美元[139.50-818.50美元]).局限性:基于EMR的研究设计没有捕捉到治疗模式,HRU和相关成本,以及参与医院之外发生的医疗保健问题,这可能导致低估了真正的疾病负担。结论:在2015年至2020年期间,中国观察到mHSPC的患病率和发病率下降和nmCRPC的发病率上升的对比趋势。雄激素剥夺疗法和第一代抗雄激素是最常用的前列腺癌相关药物。医疗资源的利用是由mHSPC的住院费用和nmCRPC的门诊费用驱动的。
    UNASSIGNED: This study assessed the treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), costs, and annual prevalence and incidence of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in China.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical records (EMR) of patients with prostate cancer from three tertiary-care hospitals in China between January 2014 and March 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze study outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 1086 patients with mHSPC and 679 patients with nmCRPC were included. From 2015 to 2020, the annual percentage of prevalent and incident cases of mHSPC decreased from 22.4% to 20.0% and 11.1% to 6.9%, respectively; for nmCRPC, these increased from 3.8% to 13.6% and 3.3% to 8.4%. Androgen-deprivation therapy and first-generation antiandrogens (bicalutamide or flutamide) were the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer-related medications at baseline and follow-up in patients with mHSPC. Bicalutamide was the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer-related medication during follow-up in patients with nmCRPC. For mHSPC, inpatient admission costs were the highest, with the median (interquartile range) costs per person-month being USD 403.00 (USD 85.50-1226.20), whereas outpatient visit costs were the highest for nmCRPC (USD 372.60 [USD 139.50-818.50]).
    UNASSIGNED: EMR-based study design did not capture treatment patterns, HRU and associated costs, and healthcare encounters that occurred outside of participating hospitals, which could have led to underestimation of the true disease burden.
    UNASSIGNED: A contrasting trend of a decline in the prevalence and incidence of mHSPC and an increase in these for nmCRPC was observed between 2015 and 2020 in China. Androgen-deprivation therapy and first-generation antiandrogens were the most frequently prescribed prostate cancer-related medications. Healthcare resource utilization was driven by inpatient costs in mHSPC and outpatient costs in nmCRPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号