Hospital Costs

医院费用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医院服务通常使用病例组合工具进行报销,该工具根据诊断和程序对患者进行分组。我们最近开发了一种案例混合工具(即,Queralt系统)旨在支持临床医生进行患者管理。在这项研究中,我们比较了一种广泛使用的工具的性能(即,APR-DRG)与Queralt系统。
    方法:对加泰罗尼亚卫生研究所的八家医院中的任何一家进行了所有入院的回顾性分析(即,大约,2019年加泰罗尼亚所有住院治疗的30%)。成本是从完全成本核算中检索的。使用电子健康记录来计算APR-DRG组和Queralt指数,及其用于诊断的不同子指标(主要诊断,入院时合并症,以及住院期间发生的并发症)和手术(主要和次要手术)。主要目标是工具的预测能力;我们还调查了效率和组内同质性。
    结果:分析包括166,837次住院事件,平均成本为4935欧元(中位数2616;四分位数范围1011-5543)。Queralt系统的组件具有更高的效率(即,每个病例组合工具中增加的组百分比所涵盖的费用和住院百分比)和较低的异质性.在预先设定的阈值下预测成本的逻辑模型(即,80岁,第90,和第95百分位数)显示了Queralt系统的更好性能,特别是当结合诊断和程序(DP)时:80岁的接收器工作特性曲线下的面积,第90,APR-DRG的第95个成本百分位数分别为0.904、0.882和0.863,和0.958、0.945和0.928的QueraltDP;APR-DRG的精确召回曲线下面积的相应值分别为0.522、0.604和0.699,以及0.748、0.7966和0.834的QueraltDP。同样,预测实际成本的线性模型在Queralt系统的情况下拟合更好。
    结论:Queralt系统,最初开发用于预测医院结果,对预测住院费用具有良好的性能和效率。
    BACKGROUND: Hospital services are typically reimbursed using case-mix tools that group patients according to diagnoses and procedures. We recently developed a case-mix tool (i.e., the Queralt system) aimed at supporting clinicians in patient management. In this study, we compared the performance of a broadly used tool (i.e., the APR-DRG) with the Queralt system.
    METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all admissions occurred in any of the eight hospitals of the Catalan Institute of Health (i.e., approximately, 30% of all hospitalizations in Catalonia) during 2019. Costs were retrieved from a full cost accounting. Electronic health records were used to calculate the APR-DRG group and the Queralt index, and its different sub-indices for diagnoses (main diagnosis, comorbidities on admission, andcomplications occurred during hospital stay) and procedures (main and secondary procedures). The primary objective was the predictive capacity of the tools; we also investigated efficiency and within-group homogeneity.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 166,837 hospitalization episodes, with a mean cost of € 4,935 (median 2,616; interquartile range 1,011-5,543). The components of the Queralt system had higher efficiency (i.e., the percentage of costs and hospitalizations covered by increasing percentages of groups from each case-mix tool) and lower heterogeneity. The logistic model for predicting costs at pre-stablished thresholds (i.e., 80th, 90th, and 95th percentiles) showed better performance for the Queralt system, particularly when combining diagnoses and procedures (DP): the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the 80th, 90th, 95th cost percentiles were 0.904, 0.882, and 0.863 for the APR-DRG, and 0.958, 0.945, and 0.928 for the Queralt DP; the corresponding values of area under the precision-recall curve were 0.522, 0.604, and 0.699 for the APR-DRG, and 0.748, 0.7966, and 0.834 for the Queralt DP. Likewise, the linear model for predicting the actual cost fitted better in the case of the Queralt system.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Queralt system, originally developed to predict hospital outcomes, has good performance and efficiency for predicting hospitalization costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目的是分析产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌(CPE)感染的临床和经济影响。
    方法:病例对照研究。患有CPE感染的成年患者被认为是病例,而非CPE感染的患者为对照。匹配标准为年龄(±5岁),性别,感染源和微生物(比例1:2)。主要结果是30天死亡率。次要结果是90天死亡率,临床失败,住院费用和资源消耗。
    结果:包括246例患者(82例和164例对照)。肺炎克雷伯菌OXA-48是引起CPE感染的最常见微生物。CPE病例先前有更多的合并症(p=0.007),感染性休克(p=0.003),并且更有可能接受不适当的经验性和确定性抗生素治疗(均p<0.001)。多因素分析确定脓毒性休克和不适当的经验性治疗是7天和治疗结束临床失败的独立预测因素。而Charlson指数和脓毒性休克与30天和90天死亡率相关。CPE感染与早期临床失败独立相关(OR2.18,95%CI,1.03-4.59),但不是治疗结束时临床失败或30天或90天死亡率。在资源消耗方面,CPE的住院费用是非CPE组的两倍.CPE病例住院时间较长(p<0.001),需要更多的长期护理设施(p<0.001)和门诊肠外抗生素治疗(p=0.007).
    结论:CPE组的临床结局较差,但这主要是由于较高的共病负担,更严重的疾病,更频繁的不适当的抗生素治疗,而不是耐药模式。然而,CPE集团消耗了更多的医疗资源,产生了更高的成本。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyse the clinical and economic impact of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections.
    METHODS: Case-control study. Adult patients with CPE infections were considered cases, while those with non-CPE infections were controls. Matching criteria were age (± 5 years), sex, source of infection and microorganism (ratio 1:2). Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, clinical failure, hospitalisation costs and resource consumption.
    RESULTS: 246 patients (82 cases and 164 controls) were included. Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48 was the most common microorganism causing CPE infections. CPE cases had more prior comorbidities (p = 0.007), septic shock (p = 0.003), and were more likely to receive inappropriate empirical and definitive antibiotic treatment (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified septic shock and inappropriate empirical treatment as independent predictors for 7-day and end-of-treatment clinical failure, whereas Charlson Index and septic shock were associated with 30- and 90-day mortality. CPE infection was independently associated with early clinical failure (OR 2.18, 95% CI, 1.03-4.59), but not with end-of-treatment clinical failure or 30- or 90-day mortality. In terms of resource consumption, hospitalisation costs for CPE were double those of the non-CPE group. CPE cases had longer hospital stay (p < 0.001), required more long-term care facilities (p < 0.001) and outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (p = 0.007).
    CONCLUSIONS: The CPE group was associated with worse clinical outcomes, but this was mainly due to a higher comorbidity burden, more severe illness, and more frequent inappropriate antibiotic treatment rather than resistance patterns as such. However, the CPE group consumed more healthcare resources and incurred higher costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨人工耳蜗植入与低成本相关的假设,与住院患者人工耳蜗植入相比,在保持同等生活质量(QoL)和听力结果的同时,荷兰的医疗保健环境。
    方法:单中心,非致盲,三级转诊中心的随机对照试验.
    方法:将30名符合单侧人工耳蜗植入手术条件的舌后双侧感音神经性耳聋成年患者随机分配到日间或住院治疗组(即,一晚入场)。我们对医疗保健相关总费用的差异进行了意向治疗评估,医院和院外费用,在日间病例和住院人工耳蜗植入之间,从医院和病人的角度来看,在一年的时间里。听力测量结果,使用CVC分数评估,和QoL,使用EQ-5D和HUI3问卷进行评估,被考虑在内。
    结果:有两个辍学。住院患者组(n=14)的医疗保健相关总费用为41,828欧元,日间病例组(n=14)为42,710欧元。住院组的平均术后住院时间为1.2天(平均费用为1,069欧元),日间病例组为0.7天(平均费用为701欧元)。术后住院费用和院外费用差异无统计学意义。术后2个月和1年的QoL,测得的EQ-5D指标值与HUI3无统计学差异。住院患者组(84/100)在术后1年测量的EQ-5DVAS评分在统计学上显着高于日间病例组(65/100)。术后并发症无差异,客观的听力结果,以及术后住院次数和院外就诊次数。
    结论:人工耳蜗植入手术的日间方法与住院方法相比,在统计学上不会显着降低与医疗保健相关的费用,并且不会影响手术结果(并发症和客观的听力测量)。QoL,和术后病程(术后住院次数和院外就诊次数)。
    方法:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the assumption that day-case cochlear implantation is associated with lower costs, compared to inpatient cochlear implantation, while maintaining equal quality of life (QoL) and hearing outcomes, for the Dutch healthcare setting.
    METHODS: A single-center, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral center.
    METHODS: Thirty adult patients with post-lingual bilateral sensorineural hearing loss eligible for unilateral cochlear implantation surgery were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group (i.e., one night admission). We performed an intention-to-treat evaluation of the difference of the total health care-related costs, hospital and out of hospital costs, between day-case and inpatient cochlear implantation, from a hospital and patient perspective over the course of one year. Audiometric outcomes, assessed using CVC scores, and QoL, assessed using the EQ-5D and HUI3 questionnaires, were taken into account.
    RESULTS: There were two drop-outs. The total health care-related costs were €41,828 in the inpatient group (n = 14) and €42,710 in the day-case group (n = 14). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.2 days (mean costs of €1,069) in the inpatient group and 0.7 days (mean costs of €701) for the day-case group. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital and out of hospital costs. The QoL at 2 months and 1 year postoperative, measured by the EQ-5D index value and HUI3 showed no statistically significant difference. The EQ-5D VAS score measured at 1 year postoperatively was statistically significantly higher in the inpatient group (84/100) than in the day-case group (65/100). There were no differences in postoperative complications, objective hearing outcomes, and number of postoperative hospital and out of hospital visits.
    CONCLUSIONS: A day-case approach to cochlear implant surgery does not result in a statistically significant reduction of health care-related costs compared to an inpatient approach and does not affect the surgical outcome (complications and objective hearing measurements), QoL, and postoperative course (number of postoperative hospital and out of hospital visits).
    METHODS:
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于人口老龄化导致的假体周围感染(PJI)的增加正在稳步增加关节置换术的数量和治疗成本。本研究分析了欧洲PJI用于全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的直接医疗成本。
    方法:数据库PubMed,Scopus,Embase,科克伦,和谷歌学者进行了系统的筛选,以确定PJI在欧洲的直接成本。进一步分析了定义关节位点和所执行程序的出版物。计算清创的平均直接医疗费用,抗生素和植入物滞留(DAIR),髋关节和膝关节PJI的一阶段和两阶段修正,分别。成本根据通货膨胀率进行了调整,并以美元(USD)报告。
    结果:在1,374份合格出版物中,经过摘要和全文审查后,最终分析中包含了12份手稿。对于所有类型的膝关节PJI翻修手术,平均直接费用为32,933美元。包括清创在内的平均直接治疗成本,抗生素,PJI后TKA的植入物保留率(DAIR)为$19,476。对于TKA的两阶段修订,平均总成本为37,980美元。对于所有类型的髋关节PJI手术,平均直接住院费用为28,904美元。对于臀部DAIR,确定了一阶段和两阶段治疗的平均费用为$7,120,$44,594和$42,166,分别。
    结论:假体周围关节感染与大量直接医疗费用相关。由于PJI成本的详细报告很少且质量有限,迫切需要有关PJI治疗费用的更详细财务数据。
    BACKGROUND: The rise of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) due to aging populations is steadily increasing the number of arthroplasties and treatment costs. This study analyzed the direct health care costs of PJI for total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Europe.
    METHODS: The databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were systematically screened for direct costs of PJI in Europe. Publications that defined the joint site and the procedure performed were further analyzed. Mean direct health care costs were calculated for debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage, and 2-stage revisions for hip and knee PJI, respectively. Costs were adjusted for inflation rates and reported in US-Dollar (USD).
    RESULTS: Of 1,374 eligible publications, 12 manuscripts were included in the final analysis after an abstract and full-text review. Mean direct costs of $32,933 were identified for all types of revision procedures for knee PJI. The mean direct treatment cost including DAIR for TKA after PJI was $19,476. For 2-stage revisions of TKA, the mean total cost was $37,980. For all types of hip PJI procedures, mean direct hospital costs were $28,904. For hip DAIR, one-stage and 2-stage treatment average costs of $7,120, $44,594, and $42,166 were identified, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic joint infections are associated with substantial direct health care costs. As detailed reports on the cost of PJI are scarce and of limited quality, more detailed financial data on the cost of PJI treatment are urgently required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诊断相关组(DRG)医院报销系统根据患者特征将病例分为成本同质组。然而,外生的组织和区域因素可以影响医院成本,超出病例组合差异。因此,大多数使用DRG系统的国家将对这些因素的调整纳入其报销结构。这项研究调查了结构性医院属性,这些属性解释了瑞士平均病例组合调整后医院成本的差异。使用丰富的患者和医院级别的数据,包含来自120家医院的3年400万例病例,我们证明了一个仅使用五个变量(放电次数,急诊/救护车接诊率,DRGs对患者的比率,基于DRG组合的预期潜在损失,和大集聚中的位置)可以解释平均病例组合调整后医院成本的一半以上的差异,捕获常见差异化医院类型的所有成本变化(例如,学术教学医院,儿童医院,出生中心,等。),并且在几年的交叉验证中是稳健的(尽管医院样本不同)。根据我们的发现,我们提出了一种简单实用的方法,以区分医院间合法的与低效率相关或无法解释的成本差异,并讨论了这种方法作为将结构性医院差异纳入成本基准和支付计划的透明方法的潜力。
    Diagnosis-related group (DRG) hospital reimbursement systems differentiate cases into cost-homogenous groups based on patient characteristics. However, exogenous organizational and regional factors can influence hospital costs beyond case-mix differences. Therefore, most countries using DRG systems incorporate adjustments for such factors into their reimbursement structure. This study investigates structural hospital attributes that explain differences in average case-mix adjusted hospital costs in Switzerland. Using rich patient and hospital-level data containing 4 million cases from 120 hospitals across 3 years, we show that a regression model using only five variables (number of discharges, ratio of emergency/ambulance admissions, rate of DRGs to patients, expected loss potential based on DRG mix, and location in large agglomeration) can explain more than half of the variance in average case-mix adjusted hospital costs, capture all cost variations across commonly differentiated hospital types (e.g., academic teaching hospitals, children\'s hospitals, birth centers, etc.), and is robust in cross-validations across several years (despite differing hospital samples). Based on our findings, we propose a simple practical approach to differentiate legitimate from inefficiency-related or unexplainable cost differences across hospitals and discuss the potential of such an approach as a transparent way to incorporate structural hospital differences into cost benchmarking and payment schemes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:流感每年造成相当大的健康和经济负担。尤其是老年人由于免疫衰老和通常潜在的医学状况而容易感染流感及其并发症。最近,创新的四价高剂量流感疫苗(QIV-HD)已在欧洲上市.通过其增强的免疫原性,QIV-HD为老年人提供了更好的保护,防止呼吸和心血管并发症。我们估计了在荷兰从QIV标准剂量(SD)转换为QIV-HD的假设过去的潜在影响-特别是在住院和相关成本方面。
    方法:接种QIV-SD疫苗的老年人的住院人数估计来自2010/2011-2017/2018季节。随后,估计了2019/2020年QIV-SD和QIV-HD的呼吸道感染和流感心血管并发症的数量.要计算相应的总体储蓄,医院并发症的费用,来源于文学,被使用。
    结果:当在2019/2020赛季使用QIV-HD代替QIV-SD时,在荷兰60岁及以上的老年人中可以避免另外220例住院。这相当于节省了1219779欧元(不确定区间:1089813-1348549),其中69%可归因于心血管相关的住院。
    结论:我们证明,通过从当前的QIV-SD转换为QIV-HD,可以实现荷兰老年人流感疫苗接种的相关改善。不仅可以从QIV-SD转换为QIV-HD,从而显着降低医院容量的压力,而且还可以节省大量成本。
    Influenza is responsible for considerable health and economic burden every year. Especially older adults are vulnerable for influenza infection and its complications due to immunosenescence and often-underlying medical conditions. Recently, the innovative quadrivalent high-dose influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) has become available in Europe. Through its enhanced immunogenicity, QIV-HD offers improved protection for older adults against respiratory as well as cardiovascular complications. We estimated the potential impact-specifically in terms of hospital admissions and related costs-of a hypothetical past switch from QIV-Standard dose (SD) to QIV-HD in The Netherlands.
    Estimates of hospitalizations for the older adults vaccinated with QIV-SD were derived from the seasons 2010/2011-2017/2018. Subsequently, the number of respiratory infections and cardiovascular complications of influenza were estimated for the year 2019/2020 for both QIV-SD and QIV-HD. To calculate the overall corresponding savings, costs for hospital complications, derived from literature, were used.
    When QIV-HD would have been used instead of QIV-SD during the season 2019/2020, an additional 220 hospitalizations would have been averted among older adults of 60 years and older in the Netherlands. This corresponds to savings of €1 219 779 (uncertainty interval: 1 089 813-1 348 549), of which 69% is attributable to cardiovascular-related hospitalizations.
    We demonstrate that a relevant improvement in influenza vaccination among older adults in The Netherlands can be achieved by switching from the current QIV-SD to QIV-HD. Not only comes a switch from QIV-SD to QIV-HD with a significant reduction in pressure on hospital capacity but also with notable cost savings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已发表的双侧和单侧全膝关节置换术(TKAs)之间的比较仍然存在偏见,因为大多数进行双侧TKA的患者都经过了预筛查,并且比进行单侧手术的普通患者更健康。我们的目标是比较同时进行双侧TKA的患者与进行单侧手术的类似患者的术后并发症和资源利用情况。
    从2002年到2011年,全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库用于鉴定接受原发性选择性TKA的患者。总共确定了4,445,263名患者。其中,190,783(4%)进行了当天的双侧手术。在同一住院期间进行双侧TKA的患者被排除在外。将并发症和费用与具有单侧手术的患者的匹配队列进行比较。这个队列是根据年龄匹配的,性别,和NIS中的30个共同定义的元素。
    共有172,366例(90%)同时进行的双侧手术与单侧手术的患者1:1匹配,以进行调整分析。双侧手术的患者发生许多并发症的风险增加,包括术后贫血(OR:2.3;95%CI:2.2-2.3,P<.001)。心脏(OR:2.1;95%CI:2.0-2.3,P<.001),和住院死亡率(OR:3.3;95%CI:2.6-4.3)。这些患者的住院费用也较高($19,343vs$12,852,P<.001),并且更常见地出院到康复机构(70%vs32%,P<.001)。
    与单侧病例相比,同时进行双侧TKA的患者发生重要术后并发症和死亡的风险增加。这些数据突出了患者选择和优化对双侧TKA和潜在成本节约的重要性。
    Published comparisons between bilateral and unilateral total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) remain biased, as most patients undergoing bilateral TKA are prescreened and healthier than average patients having unilateral procedures. Our objectives were to compare postoperative complications and resource utilization of patients having simultaneous bilateral TKAs with similar patients having unilateral procedures.
    The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify patients undergoing primary elective TKA from 2002 to 2011. A total of 4,445,263 patients were identified. Of these, 190,783 (4%) were having same-day bilateral procedures. Patients with staged bilateral TKA during the same hospitalization were excluded. Complications and costs were compared to a matched cohort of patients having unilateral procedures. This cohort was matched based on age, gender, and 30 comorbid-defined elements in the NIS.
    A total of 172,366 (90%) simultaneous bilateral procedures were matched 1:1 to patients with unilateral procedures for the adjusted analysis. Patients with bilateral procedures were at an increased risk for many complications including postoperative anemia (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 2.2-2.3, P < .001), cardiac (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 2.0-2.3, P < .001), and inhospital mortality (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2.6-4.3). These patients also incurred in higher hospital costs ($19,343 vs $12,852, P < .001) and were discharged more commonly to a rehabilitation facility (70% vs 32%, P < .001).
    Patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA are at an increased risk of developing important postoperative complications and mortality compared with unilateral cases. These data highlight the importance of patient selection and optimization for bilateral TKA and potential cost savings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)比开放式胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)显示出一些优势,但很少有研究报道这两种技术之间的成本分析。我们进行了一项结构化的成本分析,比较了使用达芬奇Xi进行的胰十二指肠切除术,传统的开放方法,并考虑与干预和短期术后课程相关的医疗保健直接费用。
    2011年1月至2020年12月期间,由同一操作员在我们的大型机器人辅助手术和胰腺手术多学科中心进行了20次RPD和194次OPD,进行回顾性分析。获得了两个可比较的组,分别为20名患者(Xi-RPD组)和40名患者(OPD组),RPD组与OPD组匹配1:2。围手术期数据和总成本,包括总体可变成本(OVC)和固定成本,进行了比较。
    平均手术时间无差异:Xi-RPD组428分钟与OPD组404分钟,p=0.212。Xi-RPD组住院时间中位数明显较低:10天比16天,p=0.001。在Xi-RPD组中,消费品成本明显更高(6149.2欧元对1267.4欧元,p<0.001),而住院费用明显较低:5231.6欧元对8180欧元(p=0.001)。OVC方面没有发现显着差异:Xi-RPD组的13,483.4欧元与OPD组的11,879.8欧元(p=0.076)。
    由于购置和维护成本较高,机器人辅助手术的成本更高。然而,尽管RPD与较高的材料成本有关,由于与OPD相似的手术时间,机器人系统的优势在于降低住院成本,并且在人员成本方面没有差异,使两种技术的OVC不再不同。因此,先进技术的较高成本可以通过临床优势部分补偿,特别是在一个高容量的多学科中心的机器人辅助和胰腺手术。这些初步数据需要进一步研究证实。
    Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has shown some advantages over open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) but few studies have reported a cost analysis between the two techniques. We conducted a structured cost-analysis comparing pancreatoduodenectomy performed with the use of the da Vinci Xi, and the traditional open approach, and considering healthcare direct costs associated with the intervention and the short-term post-operative course.
    Twenty RPD and 194 OPD performed between January 2011 and December 2020 by the same operator at our high-volume multidisciplinary center for robot-assisted surgery and for pancreatic surgery, were retrospectively analyzed. Two comparable groups of 20 patients (Xi-RPD-group) and 40 patients (OPD-group) were obtained matching 1:2 the RPD-group with the OPD-group. Perioperative data and overall costs, including overall variable costs (OVCs) and fixed costs, were compared.
    No difference was reported in mean operative time: 428 min for Xi-RPD-group versus 404 min for OPD, p = 0.212. The median overall length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the Xi-RPD-group: 10 days versus 16 days, p = 0.001. In the Xi-RPD-group, consumable costs were significantly higher (€6149.2 versus €1267.4, p < 0.001), while hospital stay costs were significantly lower: €5231.6 versus €8180 (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in terms of OVCs: €13,483.4 in Xi-RPD-group versus €11,879.8 in OPD-group (p = 0.076).
    Robot-assisted surgery is more expensive because of higher acquisition and maintenance costs. However, although RPD is associated to higher material costs, the advantages of the robotic system associated to lower hospital stay costs and the absence of difference in terms of personnel costs thanks to the similar operative time with respect to OPD, make the OVCs of the two techniques no longer different. Hence, the higher costs of advanced technology can be partially compensated by clinical advantages, particularly within a high-volume multidisciplinary center for both robot-assisted and pancreatic surgery. These preliminary data need confirmation by further studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在医院绩效评估中增加社会变量非常有兴趣。许多现有的分析,然而,已经包括患者的诊断数据,并且尚不清楚添加社会调整变量是否会提高结果的质量:关于此问题的越来越多的文献提供了混合的结果。这项研究的目的是在讨论中添加来自发展中国家的证据。
    我们估计医院控制病例的效率,有或没有调整医院的病例集,以适应患者的社会人口统计学变量。调整的幅度是基于观察到的年龄影响,性别,和逗留时间的收入,以诊断相关组(DRG)为条件。我们使用数据包络分析(DEA)来评估50家智利医院的出院效率,包括780个DRG,涵盖2013年至2015年智利总排放的约60%。
    我们发现,社会人口统计学调整在效率的DEA估计中引入了非常小的变化。根本原因是社会人口统计学对医院成本的影响相对较低,以DRG为条件,以及任何给定医院的DRG社会人口统计学的变化模式。
    我们得出的结论是,casemix调整后的医院效率估计对医院患者的社会人口统计学异质性的异质性是稳健的。这些结果证实,在发展中国家,在发达国家观察到的情况。出于管理目的,然后,将社会变量添加到医院绩效评估中的处理成本可能是不合理的。
    There is much interest in adding social variables to hospital performance assessments. Many of the existing analyses, however, already include patients\' diagnosis data, and it is not clear that adding a social adjustment variable would improve the quality of the results: the growing literature on this issue provides mixed results. The purpose in this study was to add evidence from a developing country into this discussion.
    We estimate the efficiency of hospitals controlling for casemix, with and without adjusting the hospital\'s casemix for the patients\' sociodemographic variables. The magnitude of the adjustment is based on the observed impact of age, sex, and income on length of stay, conditional on the diagnosis related group (DRG). We use a data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiency of 50 Chilean hospitals\' discharges, including 780 DRGs and covering about 60% of total discharges in Chile from 2013 to 2015.
    We found that the sociodemographic adjustment introduces very small changes in the DEA estimation of efficiency. The underlying reason is the relatively low influence of sociodemographics on hospital costs, conditional on DRG, and the changing pattern of sociodemographics across DRGs for any given hospital.
    We conclude that the casemix-adjusted estimation of hospital efficiency is robust to the heterogeneity of patients\' sociodemographic heterogeneity across hospitals. These results confirm, in a developing country, what has been observed in developed countries. For management purposes, then, the processing costs of adding social variables into hospitals\' performance assessments might not be justified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The study aims to investigate the factors causing the difference of stroke patients\' in-hospital cost and study these factors on health outcome in terms of mortality.
    METHODS: Eight hundred and sixty-two in-patients with stroke in a tertiary hospital in China from 2017 to 2019 were included in the database. Descriptive statistics indexes were used to describe patients\' in-hospital cost and mortality. Based on Elixhauser coding algorithms, multiple linear regression and logistic regressions (LRs) were used to evaluate the impact of factors identified from univariate analysis on in-hospital cost and mortality, respectively. In addition to LRs, a comparison study was then carried out with random forest, gradient boosting decision tree and artificial neural network.
    RESULTS: Factors affecting both cost and mortality are age, discharged day-of-week, length of stay, stroke subtype, other neurological disorders, renal failure, fluid and electrolyte disorders and total number of comorbidities.
    CONCLUSIONS: With the increase of age, the mortality rate of in-patients (except for the juvenile) with stroke increases and the cost of hospitalization decreases. Intracerebral haemorrhage is the most devastating stroke for its highest mortality in short length of stay. Medical services should focus on these specific comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号