Hospital Costs

医院费用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺结核(PTB)是一种普遍的慢性疾病,与患者的重大经济负担有关。利用机器学习对住院费用进行预测,可以有效配置医疗资源,合理优化费用结构,从而更好地控制患者的住院费用。
    方法:本研究分析了喀什某肺科医院信息系统(2020-2022年)的数据,涉及9570名符合条件的PTB患者。采用SPSS26.0进行多元回归分析,而Python3.7用于随机森林回归(RFR)和MLP。训练集包括2020年和2021年的数据,而测试集包括2022年的数据。该模型预测了与PTB患者相关的七种不同成本,包括诊断费用,医疗服务费用,材料成本,治疗费用,药费,其他费用,和住院总费用。使用R平方(R2)评估模型的预测性能,均方根误差(RMSE),和平均绝对误差(MAE)指标。
    结果:在纳入研究的9570名PTB患者中,住院总费用的中位数和四分位数分别为13,150.45元(9891.34,19,648.48元).九个因素,包括年龄,婚姻状况,入院条件,住院时间,初始治疗,其他疾病的存在,转让,耐药性,和招生部门,显著影响PTB患者的住院费用。总的来说,MLP在大多数成本预测中表现出卓越的性能,表现优于RFR和多元回归;RFR的性能介于MLP和多元回归之间;多元回归的预测性能最低,但它显示了其他成本的最佳结果。
    结论:MLP可以有效利用患者信息,准确预测各种住院费用,通过调整成本较高的住院项目和平衡不同的费用类别,实现住院费用的合理化结构。这种预测模型的见解也与其他医疗条件的研究相关。
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a prevalent chronic disease associated with a significant economic burden on patients. Using machine learning to predict hospitalization costs can allocate medical resources effectively and optimize the cost structure rationally, so as to control the hospitalization costs of patients better.
    METHODS: This research analyzed data (2020-2022) from a Kashgar pulmonary hospital\'s information system, involving 9570 eligible PTB patients. SPSS 26.0 was used for multiple regression analysis, while Python 3.7 was used for random forest regression (RFR) and MLP. The training set included data from 2020 and 2021, while the test set included data from 2022. The models predicted seven various costs related to PTB patients, including diagnostic cost, medical service cost, material cost, treatment cost, drug cost, other cost, and total hospitalization cost. The model\'s predictive performance was evaluated using R-square (R2), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) metrics.
    RESULTS: Among the 9570 PTB patients included in the study, the median and quartile of total hospitalization cost were 13,150.45 (9891.34, 19,648.48) yuan. Nine factors, including age, marital status, admission condition, length of hospital stay, initial treatment, presence of other diseases, transfer, drug resistance, and admission department, significantly influenced hospitalization costs for PTB patients. Overall, MLP demonstrated superior performance in most cost predictions, outperforming RFR and multiple regression; The performance of RFR is between MLP and multiple regression; The predictive performance of multiple regression is the lowest, but it shows the best results for Other costs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MLP can effectively leverage patient information and accurately predict various hospitalization costs, achieving a rationalized structure of hospitalization costs by adjusting higher-cost inpatient items and balancing different cost categories. The insights of this predictive model also hold relevance for research in other medical conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器人手术已越来越多地应用于各种手术领域,但该技术的成本效益仍存在争议,因为其成本较高,且临床结局改善有限.本研究旨在探讨机器人胰腺手术的健康经济意义。调查其对住院费用和各种医疗资源消耗的影响。收集在我们机构接受胰腺手术的患者的数据,并将其分为机器人组和传统组。住院费用的统计分析,逗留时间,不同服务类别的成本,和基于年龄的分组成本分析,BMI类,和接受的程序使用t检验和线性回归进行。尽管机器人组的总住院费用明显高于传统组,医疗耗材的成本显着降低。减少在老年患者中更为突出,肥胖患者,那些接受胰十二指肠切除术的人,这可以归因于机器人手术平台的技术优势,在很大程度上促进了血液控制,组织保护,和缝合。研究得出的结论是,尽管总体成本较高,机器人胰腺手术节省了大量医疗耗材,特别有利于某些患者亚组。这些发现为机器人手术的经济可行性提供了有价值的见解,从卫生经济学的角度支持它的采用。
    Robotic surgery has been increasingly adopted in various surgical fields, but the cost-effectiveness of this technology remains controversial due to its high cost and limited improvements in clinical outcomes. This study aims to explore the health economic implications of robotic pancreatic surgery, to investigate its impact on hospitalization costs and consumption of various medical resources. Data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at our institution were collected and divided into robotic and traditional groups. Statistical analyses of hospitalization costs, length of stay, costs across different service categories, and subgroup cost analyses based on age, BMI class, and procedure received were performed using t tests and linear regression. Although the total hospitalization cost for the robotic group was significantly higher than that for the traditional group, there was a notable reduction in the cost of medical consumables. The reduction was more prominent among elderly patients, obese patients, and those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, which could be attributed to the technological advantages of the robotic surgery platform that largely facilitate blood control, tissue protection, and suturing. The study concluded that despite higher overall costs, robotic pancreatic surgery offers significant savings in medical consumables, particularly benefiting certain patient subgroups. The findings provide valuable insights into the economic viability of robotic surgery, supporting its adoption from a health economics perspective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不良事件(AE)是医疗保健系统的重要关注点。然而,由于各种医疗服务的复杂性,很难评估它们的影响。本研究旨在使用诊断相关组(DRG)数据库评估AEs对住院患者预后的影响。我们对中国一家拥有2200张床位的多地区三级医院的住院患者进行了病例对照研究,使用DRG数据库中的数据。AE是指由需要额外住院治疗的医疗护理引起或促成的非预期身体伤害。监测,治疗,甚至死亡。相对重量(RW),DRG的特定指标,用来衡量诊断和治疗的难度,疾病严重程度,和医疗资源的利用。主要结果是住院时间(LOS)和住院费用。次要结果是出院回家。本研究应用了基于DRG的匹配,霍奇斯-莱曼估计,回归分析,和亚组分析评估AE对结局的影响。通过排除短LOS和改变调整因子进行了两项敏感性分析,以评估结果的稳健性。我们确定了2690名住院患者,他们被分为329个DRG,包括1345例出现AE的患者(病例组)和1345例DRG匹配的正常对照。Hodges-Lehmann估计和广义线性回归分析显示,AE导致LOS延长(未经调整的差异,7天,95%置信区间[CI]6-8天;调整后的差异,8.31天,95%CI7.16-9.52天)和超额住院费用(未调整差额,$2186.40,95%CI:$1836.87-$2559.16;调整后的差额,2822.67美元,95%CI:2351.25美元-3334.88美元)。Logistic回归分析显示,AEs与出院回家的几率较低相关(未调整比值比[OR]0.66,95%CI0.54-0.82;调整后OR0.75,95%CI0.61-0.93)。亚组分析表明,每个亚组的结果基本一致。在复杂疾病(RW≥2)和与高度伤害亚组(中度伤害及以上组)相关的AE后,LOS和住院费用显着增加。在敏感性分析中获得了类似的结果。AE的负担,特别是那些与复杂疾病和严重危害有关的疾病,在中国意义重大。DRG数据库是有价值的信息源,可用于评估和管理AE。
    Adverse events (AEs) are a significant concern for healthcare systems. However, it is difficult to evaluate their influence because of the complexity of various medical services. This study aimed to assess the influence of AEs on the outcomes of hospitalized patients using a diagnosis-related group (DRG) database. We conducted a case-control study of hospitalized patients at a multi-district tertiary hospital with 2200 beds in China, using data from a DRG database. An AE refers to an unintended physical injury caused or contributed to by medical care that requires additional hospitalization, monitoring, treatment, or even death. Relative weight (RW), a specific indicator of DRG, was used to measure the difficulty of diagnosis and treatment, disease severity, and medical resources utilized. The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs. The secondary outcome was discharge to home. This study applied DRG-based matching, Hodges-Lehmann estimate, regression analysis, and subgroup analysis to evaluate the influence of AEs on outcomes. Two sensitivity analyses by excluding short LOS and changing adjustment factors were performed to assess the robustness of the results. We identified 2690 hospitalized patients who had been divided into 329 DRGs, including 1345 patients who experienced AEs (case group) and 1345 DRG-matched normal controls. The Hodges-Lehmann estimate and generalized linear regression analysis showed AEs led to prolonged LOS (unadjusted difference, 7 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-8 days; adjusted difference, 8.31 days, 95% CI 7.16-9.52 days) and excess hospitalization costs (unadjusted difference, $2186.40, 95% CI: $1836.87-$2559.16; adjusted difference, $2822.67, 95% CI: $2351.25-$3334.88). Logistic regression analysis showed AEs were associated with lower odds of discharge to home (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.82; adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93). The subgroup analyses showed that the results for each subgroup were largely consistent. LOS and hospitalization costs increased significantly after AEs in complex diseases (RW ≥ 2) and in relation to high degrees of harm subgroups (moderate harm and above groups). Similar results were obtained in sensitivity analyses. The burden of AEs, especially those related to complex diseases and severe harm, is significant in China. The DRG database serves as a valuable source of information that can be utilized for the evaluation and management of AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:诊断干预数据包(DIP)支付系统,由中国国家医疗保障局发起,旨在提高医疗保健效率并管理不断上涨的医疗保健成本。这项研究旨在评估DIP支付改革对妇产科专科医院住院护理的影响,重点关注其对各种患者群体的影响。
    方法:要评估DIP策略的效果,我们采用了差异差异(DID)方法。该方法用于分析不同患者组的总住院费用和住院时间(LOS)的变化,特别是在选择DIP类别内。该研究涉及对DIP政策实施前后的影响进行全面检查。
    结果:我们的发现表明,DIP政策的实施导致相对于自费组,被保险人组的总成本和LOS均显着增加。该研究进一步确定了改革前后DIP组内的差异。对特定疾病组的深入分析显示,与自付组相比,被保险人组的总费用和LOS明显更高。
    结论:DIP改革带来了一些挑战,包括上编码和诊断歧义,因为追求更高的报销。这些发现强调了持续改进DIP支付系统的必要性,以便有效应对这些挑战并优化医疗保健服务和成本管理。
    BACKGROUND: The Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) payment system, initiated by China\'s National Healthcare Security Administration, is designed to enhance healthcare efficiency and manage rising healthcare costs. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the DIP payment reform on inpatient care in a specialized obstetrics and gynecology hospital, with a focus on its implications for various patient groups.
    METHODS: To assess the DIP policy\'s effects, we employed the Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach. This method was used to analyze changes in total hospital costs and Length of Stay (LOS) across different patient groups, particularly within select DIP categories. The study involved a comprehensive examination of the DIP policy\'s influence pre- and post-implementation.
    RESULTS: Our findings indicate that the implementation of the DIP policy led to a significant increase in both total costs and LOS for the insured group relative to the self-paying group. The study further identified variations within DIP groups both before and after the reform. In-depth analysis of specific disease groups revealed that the insured group experienced notably higher total costs and LOS compared to the self-paying group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The DIP reform has led to several challenges, including upcoding and diagnostic ambiguity, because of the pursuit of higher reimbursements. These findings underscore the necessity for continuous improvement of the DIP payment system to effectively tackle these challenges and optimize healthcare delivery and cost management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着中国对关节置换手术的需求不断增加,政府先后出台了人工关节国家集中采购(NCP)和国家批量采购(NVBP)政策。这项研究的目的是评估NCP和NVBP政策对住院费用的影响,全髋关节置换术(THA)的再住院率和再手术率。
    总共,回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年9月接受THA的347例患者。根据NCP和NVBP的实施,患者分为三组:对照组(n=147),NCP组(n=130),和NVBP组(n=70)。患者层面的总住院费用数据,再住院率,在政策实施前后,收集了THA的再手术率和住院部分费用,并使用消费者价格指数来标准化费用。
    实施NCP和NVBP后,住院总费用下降了817.41美元和3950.60美元(p<0.01),分别。植入费用从$5264.29下降到$4185.53,然后迅速下降到$1143.49(p<0.01),有助于增加总成本节约。然而,NCP和NVBP实施后,手术和康复费用增加(p<0.01)。植入物的比例从66.76下降到59.22%,然后下降到29.07%,而药物的比例从7.98%增加到10.11%,然后增加到12.06%。营业费用占比从4.86上升到8.01%,再上升到18.47%。单因素线性回归分析显示,NCP和NVBP与住院总费用相关(p<0.01)。多因素分析显示,住院时间,NCP和NVBP是住院总费用的独立预测因子(p<0.01)。
    在这项研究中,住院,NCP,和NVBP是住院总费用的独立预测因子.NVBP政策实施后,植入物和住院费用大幅下降,医务人员的技术劳动价值增加,但是仍然需要多方面的方法来解决其他耗材成本增加的问题。研究的局限性表明,将来需要进一步和更全面的评估。
    UNASSIGNED: With the increasing demand for joint replacement surgery in China, the government has successively issued the policies of national centralized procurement (NCP) and national volume-based procurement (NVBP) of artificial joints. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of NCP and NVBP policies on hospitalization cost, rehospitalization and reoperation rate of total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 347 patients who underwent THA from January 2019 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the implementation of NCP and NVBP, patients were divided into three groups: control group (n = 147), NCP group (n = 130), and NVBP group (n = 70). Patient-level data on the total hospitalization costs, rehospitalization rate, THA reoperation rate and inpatient component costs were collected before and after the implementation of the policies and Consumer Price Index was used to standardize the cost.
    UNASSIGNED: After the implementation of NCP and NVBP, the total cost of hospitalization decreased by $817.41 and $3950.60 (p < 0.01), respectively. The implantation costs decreased from $5264.29 to $4185.53 and then rapidly to $1143.49 (p < 0.01), contributing to increased total cost savings. However, the cost of surgery and rehabilitation increased after NCP and NVBP implementation (p < 0.01). The proportion of implants decreased from 66.76 to 59.22% and then to 29.07%, whereas that of drugs increased from 7.98 to 10.11% and then to 12.06%. The proportion of operating expenses rose from 4.86 to 8.01% and then to 18.47%. Univariate linear regression analysis showed that hospital stay, NCP and NVBP were correlated with total hospitalization cost (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that hospital stay, NCP and NVBP were independent predictors of total hospitalization cost (p < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, hospital stay, NCP, and NVBP were independent predictors of total inpatient costs. After the implementation of NVBP policy, the cost of implants and hospitalization has decreased significantly, and the technical labor value of medical staff has increased, but a multifaceted method is still needed to solve the problem of increasing costs of other consumables. Limitations of the study suggest the need for further and more comprehensive evaluation in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于全球老年人的比例和癌症的发病率不断增加,老年癌症住院患者的医疗费用正在显著增加,这给他们的家庭和社会带来了巨大的经济压力。本研究描述了老年癌症患者的实际直接医疗费用,并分析了费用的影响因素,为预防和控制老年癌症患者的高医疗费用提供建议。
    方法:对2016年6月至2020年6月大连市某三级医院11399例老年癌症住院患者的住院费用数据进行回顾性描述性分析。不同组间差异采用单因素分析,对住院费用的影响因素进行多元线性回归分析。
    结果:2016-2020年老年癌症患者住院费用呈下降趋势。具体来说,住院费用排名前三的是材料费,药费和手术费,根据分类,占所有癌症的10%以上:结直肠癌(23.96%),肺(21.74%),乳腺癌(12.34%)和胃癌(12.07%)。多元线性回归分析表明,癌症类型,手术,年和住院时间(LOS)对四种类型的住院费用有共同影响(P<0.05)。
    结论:根据LOS,老年癌症患者的四种住院费用存在显着差异,手术,癌症的年份和类型。研究结果表明,卫生行政部门应加强对住院费用和老年癌症患者治疗的监督。应采取措施,依托医院信息系统,加强肿瘤疾病和科室的成本管理,优化内部管理体系,缩短老年癌症患者的LOS,合理控制疾病诊断费用,治疗和科室操作,有效减轻老年癌症患者的经济负担。
    BACKGROUND: Because the proportion of elderly individuals and the incidence of cancer worldwide are continually increasing, medical costs for elderly inpatients with cancer are being significantly increasing, which puts tremendous financial pressure on their families and society. The current study described the actual direct medical costs of elderly inpatients with cancer and analyzed the influencing factors for the costs to provide advice on the prevention and control of the high medical costs of elderly patients with cancer.
    METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed on the hospitalization expense data of 11,399 elderly inpatients with cancer at a tier-3 hospital in Dalian between June 2016 and June 2020. The differences between different groups were analyzed using univariate analysis, and the influencing factors of hospitalization expenses were explored by multiple linear regression analysis.
    RESULTS: The hospitalization cost of elderly cancer patients showed a decreasing trend from 2016 to 2020. Specifically, the top 3 hospitalization costs were material costs, drug costs and surgery costs, which accounted for greater than 10% of all cancers according to the classification: colorectal (23.96%), lung (21.74%), breast (12.34%) and stomach cancer (12.07%). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that cancer type, surgery, year and length of stay (LOS) had a common impact on the four types of hospitalization costs (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in the four types of hospitalization costs for elderly cancer patients according to the LOS, surgery, year and type of cancer. The study results suggest that the health administration department should enhance the supervision of hospital costs and elderly cancer patient treatment. Measures should be taken by relying on the hospital information system to strengthen the cost management of cancer diseases and departments, optimize the internal management system, shorten elderly cancer patients LOS, and reasonably control the costs of disease diagnosis, treatment and department operation to effectively reduce the economic burden of elderly cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:上尿路结石(UUTSs)是最常见的尿路结石类型,近年来发病率逐年上升,严重影响患者的日常生活。本研究旨在比较一期和分期输尿管软镜碎石术(FURL)治疗UUTS的疗效。
    方法:选取2019年12月至2023年3月我院收治的142例UUTSs患者进行回顾性分析。包括76例接受分期FURL的患者(对照组)和66例接受一期FURL的患者(观察组)。手术的持续时间,逗留时间,结石清除率,术后并发症的发生率(从术后到出院),分析两组患者的住院总费用。术前(T0)进行视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和日常生活活动能力(ADL)评分,手术后3天(T1),和手术后7天(T2)。术后随访1个月。他们的生活质量使用MOS项目简表健康调查(SF-36)进行评估。
    结果:两组的结石清除率或术后并发症发生率无差异(p>0.05)。操作时间,观察组住院时间和住院费用为75.58±15.91min,4.20±1.24天,14312.62±1078.89元,分别,低于对照组(p<0.05)。此外,T3时VAS评分降低至1.49±0.70,而观察组ADL和SF-36评分高于对照组(p<0.05)。
    结论:一期FURL缩短了手术时间和住院时间,降低住院费用,改善UUTSs患者的生活质量。
    OBJECTIVE: Upper urinary tract stones (UUTSs) are among the most common types of urinary stones, and their incidence rate has been increasing annually in recent years, seriously affecting the daily lives of patients. This study aimed to compare the treatment efficacy of one-stage and staged flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) for UUTSs.
    METHODS: A total of 142 patients with UUTSs admitted to our hospital between December 2019 and March 2023 were selected for retrospective analysis, including 76 patients who received staged FURL (control group) and 66 patients who received one-stage FURL (observation group). The duration of surgery, length of stay, stone clearance rate, incidence of postoperative complications (from postsurgery to discharge), and total hospitalization cost were analyzed in both groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) score and activities of daily living (ADL) score were assessed before surgery (T0), 3 days after surgery (T1), and 7 days after surgery (T2). Patients were followed up for 1 month after surgery, and their quality of life was assessed using the MOS Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).
    RESULTS: There was no difference in the stone clearance rate or incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). The operation time, hospitalization time and hospitalization cost in the observation group were 75.58 ± 15.91 min, 4.20 ± 1.24 days and 14312.62 ± 1078.89 yuan, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, the VAS score at T3 was decreased to 1.49 ± 0.70, while the ADL and SF-36 scores were higher in the observation group (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: One-stage FURL shortens the duration of surgery and length of stay, reduces hospitalization costs, and improves the quality of life of patients with UUTSs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:报告中国中老年风湿性疾病患者住院费用及相关危险因素。
    方法:研究参与者包括2016年江苏省健康账户数据库中来自各级医院的住院患者。参与者是通过使用多阶段抽样方法选择的。年龄<45岁的患者被排除在外,根据第10版《国际疾病分类》确定因风湿性疾病住院的患者。采用广义线性模型分析风湿性疾病患者住院费用相关的社会人口学特征。
    结果:该研究包括3696名患者。风湿性疾病患者的平均住院费用为4038.63美元。女性性别,长时间的逗留,年龄在65到74岁之间,免费医疗,不纳入城乡居民基本医疗保险,高医院水平与高住院费用相关.
    结论:本研究调查了中国中老年风湿性疾病患者的住院费用及相关影响因素。我们的发现有助于进一步研究疾病成本和预防风湿病策略的经济学评估。
    OBJECTIVE: To report the cost of hospitalization and the associated risk factors for rheumatic diseases in middle-aged and elderly patients in China.
    METHODS: The study participants included inpatients from hospitals of various levels in the Jiangsu Province Health Account database in 2016. Participants were selected by using a multistage sampling method. Patients <45 years of age were excluded, and patients hospitalized for rheumatic diseases were identified according to the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the sociodemographic characteristics related to the hospitalization costs of patients with rheumatic diseases.
    RESULTS: The study included 3696 patients. The average cost of hospitalization for patients with rheumatic diseases was USD 4038.63. Female sex, a long length of stay, age between 65 and 74 years, free medical care, not being covered by the Urban-Rural Residents Basic Medical Insurance, and a high hospital level were associated with high hospitalization costs.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study examined hospitalization costs and relevant influencing factors in middle-aged and elderly patients with rheumatic disease in China. Our findings are useful for further research on costs of disease and the economic evaluation of strategies to prevent rheumatic disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脆弱,代表身体的生理储备和耐受性,作为老年人总体状况的重要评价指标。本研究旨在调查中国老年腰椎退行性疾病患者术前虚弱的患病率及其对术后结局的影响。
    在这项前瞻性研究中,共有280名60岁及以上的病人,被诊断为腰椎退行性疾病并计划进行手术干预。使用蒂尔堡脆弱指标(TFI)和改良的脆弱指数11(mFI-11)评估手术前脆弱的患病率。主要结果是术后30天内的并发症。次要结果是住院时间,医院费用,术后30天内再次手术,出院后30天内计划外再入院。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归筛选和确定患者术后并发症的危险因素。
    最终将272名老年人纳入研究。TFI和mFI-11的虚弱检出率分别为15.8%(43/272)和10.7%(29/272)。34例患者(12.5%)出现并发症。并发症发生率显著升高,住院时间延长,医院费用增加,虚弱组再入院率高于非虚弱组(P<0.05)。单变量分析显示与并发症相关的潜在因素为TFI,mFI-11和白蛋白。多因素logistic回归分析显示TFI是术后并发症的独立危险因素(OR=5.371,95%CI:2.338~12.341,P<0.001)。
    虚弱是接受腰椎融合术的老年人术后并发症的独立预测因子。应对此类患者进行虚弱评估,以改善术前风险分层并优化围手术期管理策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Frailty, representing the physiological reserve and tolerance of the body, serves as a crucial evaluation index of the overall status of the older adults. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of preoperative frailty and its impact on postoperative outcomes among older adults with lumbar degenerative disease in China.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective study, a total of 280 patients aged 60 and above, diagnosed with lumbar degenerative disease and scheduled for surgical intervention were enrolled. The prevalence of frailty pre-surgery was evaluated using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the modified Frailty Index 11 (mFI-11). The primary outcome was postoperative complication within 30 days post-surgery. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, hospital costs, reoperation within 30 days post-surgery and unplanned readmission within 30 days post-discharge. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression were employed to screen and identify the risk factors predisposing patients to postoperative complications.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 272 older adults were included in the study ultimately. The frailty detection rates of TFI and mFI-11 were 15.8% (43/272) and 10.7% (29/272) respectively. Thirty-four patients (12.5%) encountered complications. Significantly elevated rates of complications, prolonged hospital stays, increased hospital costs, and heightened readmission rates were observed in the frail group compared to the non-frail group (P<0.05). Univariable analysis showed that the potential factors related to complications are TFI, mFI-11 and albumin. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that TFI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (OR=5.371, 95% CI: 2.338-12.341, P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Frailty was an independent predictor of postoperative complications in older adults undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Frailty assessment should be performed in such patients to improve preoperative risk stratification and optimize perioperative management strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估中国狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者的医院医疗资源利用(HCRU)和相关住院费用,并将这些结果与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)队列(SLE有/无LN)进行比较,以及探索终末期肾病(ESKD)的影响。
    方法:这项基于回顾性行政索赔的分析使用诊断代码和关键词确定了来自中国的SLE和SLE合并LN患者。LN患者根据ESKD的存在进行分类。结果包括全因和特定疾病的HCRU(定义为医疗保健访问,包括住院和门诊访问)和医疗费用(2022年美元)。
    结果:总计,纳入3645例SLE患者,其中404人(11%)患有LN。在那些有LN的人中,142(35%)患有ESKD。LN患者(2.08[4.01])与SLE患者(0.92[1.64];P<.0001)相比,每位患者每月的全因医疗保健就诊(PPPM)中位数(四分位数范围)明显更高。LN和ESKD患者(3.00[4.18])与无ESKD的LN患者(1.50[3.45])相比,有更多的全因医疗就诊PPPM。LN患者($287.46[477.15])与SLE患者($113.09[267.39];P<.0001)的全因费用中位数明显更高,LN和ESKD患者($466.29[958.90])与无ESKD患者($223.50[319.56])的数值更高。
    结论:与一般SLE队列相比,中国LN患者的HCRU和医院医疗费用更高。对于患有ESKD的人来说,这种负担更高。这些数据凸显了中国LN患者中大量的HCRU,尤其是那些有ESKD的人,提示需要早期诊断和及时治疗LN以减轻经济负担。
    OBJECTIVE: Assess hospital healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated hospital costs of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) in China and compare these outcomes with a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort (SLE with/without LN) as well as exploring the effect of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).
    METHODS: This retrospective administrative claims-based analysis identified patients with SLE and SLE with LN from China using diagnosis codes and keywords. Patients with LN were subcategorized by presence of ESKD. Outcomes included all-cause and disease-specific HCRU (defined as healthcare visits including inpatient and outpatient visits) and medical costs (in 2022 US dollars).
    RESULTS: In total, 3645 patients with SLE were included, of whom 404 (11%) had LN. Among those with LN, 142 (35%) had ESKD. Median (interquartile range) all-cause healthcare visits per patient per month (PPPM) was significantly greater for patients with LN (2.08 [4.01]) vs SLE (0.92 [1.64]; P < .0001). Patients with LN and ESKD (3.00 [4.18]) had numerically more all-cause healthcare visits PPPM compared with LN patients without ESKD (1.50 [3.45]). Median all-cause costs PPPM were significantly greater among patients with LN ($287.46 [477.15]) vs SLE ($113.09 [267.39]; P < .0001) and numerically higher for patients with LN and ESKD ($466.29 [958.90]) vs LN without ESKD ($223.50 [319.56]).
    CONCLUSIONS: Chinese patients with LN had greater HCRU and hospital healthcare costs compared with the general SLE cohort. This burden was higher for those with ESKD. These data highlight the substantial HCRU among patients with LN in China, especially those with ESKD, suggesting the need for early diagnosis and timely management of LN to mitigate the economic burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号