This paper discusses the historical context of collaborative research and authorship disputes, exemplified by the complex relationship between Dutch anatomist and physician Gerard L. Blaes and his East-Central European mentee, Daniel Gödtke, during the study of medulla spinalis. The study employs historical analysis to unravel the dynamics of scholarly collaboration, emphasizing the significance of mentorship in scientific progress and the communal nature of knowledge exchange. This historical analysis is based on primary sources and historical records. It underscores Blaes\'s strategy to circumvent public confrontations regarding the authorship of the seminal work \'Anatome medullae spinalis, et nervorum inde provenientium\' (1666). As a teacher, he facilitated his student\'s participation in a public disputation to avert public authorship conflicts over the book. This ultimately led to the publication of two distinct versions of \'Anatome medullae spinalis.\' The first one was co-authored by the mentor and his mentee, while the latter was solely attributed to the mentor. This historical narrative raises essential questions about attributing individual contributions in medical sciences, echoing concerns still pertinent in contemporary academia. Additionally, it makes visible the power dynamics inherent in faculty-students relationships and the potential repercussions of authorship disputes on scholars\' reputations. By drawing parallels between historical and modern authorship dilemmas, this study contributes to ongoing discussions on equitable authorship in scientific research and publishing. It not only highlights a historical precedent for the complex dynamics of mentor-mentee collaborations and authorship disputes but also illuminates how these practices continue to influence contemporary academic and publishing customs.

The year 1992 is an important landmark in the history of Russian pharmaceutical market. It began not in January, but in December 1991, when orders of the President and the Government to open free market of medications were promulgated. The Yeltsin advisers conceived that market economy was infallible means to combat medication shortages, corruption and bureaucratic monopoly. However, panacea did not work. Moreover, it gave rise to completely new problems. The human and state security implies protection from threats of dependence. The unprepared dive into market plunged Russians and the country into deep dependence on imported medications and foreign pharmaceutical companies. The proposed study proceeds our publications in this journal and in journal \"Pharmacia\" in 2022. At that time, analysis of medication \"famine\" was implemented on basis of published sources and relied on journalistic evidences. The current study was carried out on the basis of archive documents of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and authors interviews of representatives of the regulator. The first report reveals administrative mechanism that engendered crisis of medication supply in the first post-Soviet year of our country.

BACKGROUND: Many medical eponyms were established when women and racialized individuals were excluded from medicine. The objective of this study was to determine the gender and racialization status of individuals whose names are incorporated in medical eponyms.
METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of gender and racialization of medical eponym namesakes. The main outcome measures were the study of gender and racialization of medical eponym namesakes found in Whonamedit, Mosby\'s Medical Dictionary, and the International Classification of Diseases (version 10). The gender and whether the individual was a racialized person were determined using pictures and other available information.
RESULTS: We identified 3484 unique eponyms. White men represented the majority of medical eponym namesakes (2190 of 2327, 94.1%) followed by white women (85 of 2327, 3.7%), racialized men (49 of 2327, 2.1%), and racialized women (3 of 2327, 0.1%). In the ICD-10 sub-analysis, white men represented the majority of medical eponym namesakes (476 of 514, 92.6%) followed by white women (22 of 514, 4.3%), racialized men (14 of 514, 2.7%), and racialized women (2 of 514, 0.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Most medical eponyms represent men and white individuals, highlighting the underrepresentation of women and racialized individuals. This indicates a need to re-examine the ongoing use of medical eponyms which may entrench sexism and racism in medicine and contribute to an environment that makes some feel unwelcome or undervalued.

Background and objective The period spanning 1923-1927 was a turbulent period in Greek history following the catastrophic defeat of the Greek army in September 1922, known as the \"Asia Minor Catastrophe\". The massive settlement of refugees in Thessaloniki, Greece, entailed massive economic, public health, and social challenges. The present historical-epidemiological study aims to evaluate the diseases of individuals hospitalized at the \"Agios Dimitrios\" Hospital in Thessaloniki during the aforementioned period. Materials and methods This study involved 15,146 consecutive patients (January 1923-March 1927) treated at the hospital. Data were collected from the General Hospital of Thessaloniki \"Agios Dimitrios\" and were manually entered into a pre-coded database. Descriptive statistics were calculated. In addition, the case fatality rates (CFR) were calculated; the respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results The most frequent causes for admission to the hospital were as follows: normal delivery/delivery without disclosed sequalae (n=1915, 12.7%), followed by tuberculosis (n=1514, 10.0%), malaria (n=1438, 9.5%), injuries/falls/fractures (n=1394, 9.2%), pneumonia/pleuritis (n=1010, 6.7%), appendicitis (n=623, 4.1%), dysentery/enterocolitis/typhoid (n=489, 3.2%), salpingitis/salpingo-oophoritis (n=358, 2.4%), soft tissue abscesses (n=309, 2.0%), hernias (n=295, 2.0%), rabies (n=239, 1.6%), metrorrhagia/menorrhagia (n=233, 1.5%), ocular cataract (n=225, 1.5%), postpartum infections/endometritis (n=181, 1.2%), uterine discomfort/uterine pain (n=162, 1.1%), nephritis/uremia (n=157, 1.0%), miscarriage (n=155, 1.0%), skin infections/inflammations excluding abscesses (n=152, 1.0%), otitis/mastoiditis/labyrinthitis (n=96, 0.6%), and peptic ulcer (n=93, 0.6%). Tuberculosis was particularly associated with high CFR (49.5%, 95% CI: 47.2-52.3%), followed by nephritis/uremia (CFR: 37.6%), dysentery/infectious enterocolitis/typhoid (CFR: 24.3%), peptic ulcer (CFR: 22.6%), pneumonia/pleuritis (CFR: 16.1%), postpartum infections/endometritis (CFR: 15.5%). Conclusions Infections predominated in the disease spectrum of the hospitalized population. The documented fatality rates were high; poor outcomes may reflect the socioeconomic adversities and limited medical means and resources available at that time.

Interdisciplinary collaboration is regarded as a desirable way of researching and, in some instances, even a requirement for academic teams and funding proposals. This paper explores the possibilities, but also the problems, of collaboration between different disciplines through a case study of the Ancientbiotics team. This team explores the potential of natural products contained in historical medical recipes. The search for clinically useful natural products in unusual places, such as historical medical practices, is a well-established endeavor in the scientific disciplines. The Ancientbiotics collaboration, largely based across UK institutions, takes this path a step forward in combining modern scientific knowledge of natural products with expertise from humanities to identify ingredient combinations. After 7 years of practice, the research has produced a variety of outcomes. This perspective will explore how the team worked within an interdisciplinary framework to advance investigation and application of historical medical recipes.

Currently, life expectancy is increasing every year, and with it the diseases that are characteristic of the elderly. Dementia is one such condition. According to statistics, there are 9 people with dementia per 100 healthy people aged 60 and over. However, it is important to understand that dementia can also be viewed in a historical context. Over time, ideas about this condition, approaches to its management, as well as the attitude of society towards patients with dementia have changed. The article describes the history of the study of dementia, which went along with the development of medicine, anatomy, neurology and psychiatry. In different historical periods, people\'s understanding of the mechanisms of development, etiology and pathogenesis of this condition has changed. Ethics and deontology gradually developed, which undoubtedly played an important role in improving the life of not only patients with dementia, but also the relationship between the doctor and the patient as a whole. The main stages in the study of dementia have become the basis for the modern understanding of this condition.
В настоящее время продолжительность жизни увеличивается с каждым годом, но вместе с ней растет и число заболеваний, характерных для пожилых людей. Деменция — одно из таких состояний. Согласно статистическим данным, на 100 здоровых человек в возрасте 60 лет и старше приходятся 9 лиц, имеющих деменцию разной степени тяжести. Вопросы деменции можно рассматривать и в историческом контексте. С течением времени менялись представления об этом состоянии, подходы к его лечению, а также отношение общества к больным деменцией. В статье описывается история изучения деменции, которая шла параллельно с развитием анатомии, неврологии и психиатрии. В разных исторических промежутках менялось понимание механизмов развития, этиологии и патогенеза данного состояния. Постепенно развивались этика и деонтология, что несомненно сыграло важную роль не только для улучшения жизни пациентов с деменцией, но и отношений врача и пациента. Основные этапы изучения деменции стали основой для современного представления о данном состоянии.

History has conflated the legacies of José Manuel Rodríguez Delgado and Walter Freeman, midcentury proponents of somatic therapies for neuropsychiatric conditions. Both gained notoriety: Delgado after he appeared on the front page of the New York Times having used his stimoceiver to stop a charging bull in Spain; Freeman as the proponent of lobotomy. Both were the object of critique by the antipsychiatry movement and those who felt that their methods and objectives posed a threat to personal liberty. Using archival sources, we demonstrate that this conflation is a misrepresentation of the historical record and that their methods, objectives, ethics, and philosophical commitments differed widely. Accurate knowledge about historical antecedents is a predicate for ethical analysis and becomes especially relevant information as neuroscience develops circuit-based treatments for conditions such as Parkinson disease, depression, and brain injury. Part of that corrective is to counter the conflation of Delgado\'s and Freeman\'s life and work. Appreciating their distinctive legacies can help guide neuropsychiatric research done today that might yet haunt future generations.

This article aims to investigate about the social stigma and the prejudice of society towards the patients with leprosy, but also to understand how this infectious disease has largely influenced human lifestyle and evolution analyzing the evolution of its treatments from past empirical treatments to actual multidrug therapy (MDT). References on leprosy were extensively searched in literature using PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Springer link and Elsevier\'s (EMBASE.com) databases, but also in medical, religious and archaeological books. Leprosy\'s spread all around the world following human paths of migration from the African Continent to the Asian one and to Europe, instead its appearance in the New Continent is more recent. Wars, unhygienic conditions, social and health inequality created conditions for its spread since prehistorical times, and existing health disparities contributed to unequal morbidity and mortality, before its gradual decline after the Middle Ages due to the raise of other worse pandemics. Starting from Renaissance, a deeper knowledge on its pathophysiological mechanisms brought an increasingly advanced combined surgical and pharmacological treatment, but still in modern times many efforts have been made to erase its social stigma, changing its name in \"Hansen\'s disease\" included.

With the current COVID-19 pandemic that humanity is experiencing and the mobilization of all health systems to exercise sanitary measures such as quarantines and other measures to reduce infections, it should be remembered that these practices have been possible thanks to the experiences that in hygiene matters we have accumulated in our history. This essay aims to highlight about hygiene, the historicity of the concept, and its object of study as a medical discipline, in medical texts published in Spain during the 19th century, to help us understand the contributions of this science to current clinical practice and for these purposes, the bibliographic material was obtained from the National Library of Spain.
Con la actual pandemia de COVID-19 que la humanidad vive y la movilización de todos los sistemas de salud para ejercer medidas sanitarias, como los confinamientos, las cuarentenas y otras medidas para disminuir los contagios, vale la pena recordar que estas prácticas han sido posibles por las experiencias que en materia de higiene hemos acumulado en nuestra historia. Este ensayo tiene como objetivo destacar la higiene, la historicidad del concepto y su objeto de estudio como disciplina médica, en textos publicados en España en el siglo XIX, para ayudarnos a entender los aportes de esta ciencia a la práctica clínica actual. Con tales fines se obtuvo el material bibliográfico en la Biblioteca Nacional de España.

BACKGROUND: History courses are \"required\" elements among the didactic elements of the medical and pharmacy curricula in many schools around the world. The aim of this study was to develop consensus-based aims, contents, intended learning outcomes, teaching, and evaluation methods of a history of medicine and pharmacy course for medical and pharmacy students in the Arab World.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify course aims, contents, intended learning outcomes from the literature. The search was supplemented by semi-structured in-depth interviews with 5 educators/academicians, 3 pharmacists, and 3 physicians. The Delphi technique was used among panelists (10 educators/academicians, 4 physicians, and 4 pharmacists) to develop consensus-based course aims, contents, intended learning outcomes, teaching, and evaluation methods.
RESULTS: The vast majority of the panelists agreed on the 10 items (agreement ≥88.9%) on the importance of teaching history to medical and pharmacy students. Consensus-based aims (n = 4) and intended learning outcomes (n = 13) were developed in the 1st and 2nd iterative Delphi rounds. The panelists suggested that 16 dedicated meeting hours (1 credit hour) would be required to cover the course. Bloom\'s verbs were used to target the lower and higher orders of the cognitive domain. The course could be taught through face-to-face lectures, provision of reading materials, video documentaries, case studies, group discussions and debates. Multiple-choice questions, written reflections, portfolios, group projects, and engagement in discussions and debates might be used to evaluate performance of students.
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus-based course of history of medicine and pharmacy course was developed for medical and pharmacy students in the Arab World. Well-designed course aims, contents, intended learning outcomes, teaching, and evaluation methods are more likely to meet the accreditation requirements and might improve performance of medical and pharmacy students. Future studies are still needed to investigate if such consensus-based courses can improve performance of the students.