Histone deacetylase inhibitor

组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Schistosomiasis is a neglected zoonotic parasitic disease. Currently, praziquantel is the drug of choice for the treatment of schistosomiasis, and is the only effective chemical for treatment of schistosomiasis japonica. Since its introduction in the 1970s, praziquantel has been used for large-scale chemotherapy of schistosomiasis for over 40 years. However, there have been reports pertaining to the resistance to praziquantel in schistosomes. Therefore, development of novel antischistosomal agents as alternatives of praziquantel, is of great need. Histone deacetylases and histone acetyltransferases have been recently reported to play critical roles in the growth, development and reproduction of schistosomes, and are considered as potential drug targets for the treatment of schistosomiasis. This review summarizes the latest advances of histone deacetylase and histone acetyltransferase inhibitors in the research on antischistosomal drugs, so as to provide insights into research and development of novelantischistosomal agents.
    [摘要] 血吸虫病是一种被忽视的人兽共患寄生虫病。目前, 吡喹酮是治疗血吸虫病的首选药物, 也是治疗日本血吸虫 病的唯一有效药物。自 20 世纪 70 年代问世以来, 吡喹酮已在大规模血吸虫病化疗中应用了 40 余年, 长期大规模使用导 致部分地区血吸虫对其产生了抗性, 因此迫切需要研发新型抗血吸虫药物作为候选替代药物。近期研究表明, 组蛋白去 乙酰化酶和组蛋白乙酰转移酶在血吸虫的生长发育以及繁殖等阶段中均起关键作用, 被认为是治疗血吸虫病的潜在药 物靶点。本文总结了组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂与组蛋白乙酰转移酶抑制剂在抗血吸虫药物研究中的最新进展, 以期为 抗血吸虫新药的研发提供参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    外周T细胞淋巴瘤(PTCL)的总生存期令人沮丧。组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)抑制剂对PTCL患者具有良好的治疗效果。因此,这项工作旨在系统评估基于HDAC抑制剂的治疗对未治疗和复发/难治性(R/R)PTCL患者的治疗结果和安全性.
    在WebofScience上搜索了HDAC抑制剂治疗PTCL的前瞻性临床试验,PubMed,Embase,ClinicalTrials.gov,和Cochrane图书馆数据库。汇总的总体反应率,完全反应(CR)率,并测量部分反应率。评估不良事件的风险。此外,亚组分析用于评估不同HDAC抑制剂的疗效和不同PTCL亚型的疗效.
    对于未经处理的PTCL,参与了7项研究的502名患者,合并CR率为44%(95%CI,39-48%)。对于R/RPTCL患者,包括16项研究,CR率为14%(95%CI,11-16%)。与HDAC抑制剂单一疗法相比,基于HDAC抑制剂的联合疗法对R/RPTCL患者表现出更好的疗效(P=0.02)。此外,合并CR率为17%(95%CI,13-22%),10%(95%CI,5-15%),和10%(95%CI,5-15%)的罗米地辛,belinostat,和西达本胺单药治疗亚组,分别。在R/R血管免疫母细胞性T细胞淋巴瘤亚组中,合并的ORR为44%(95%CI,35-53%),高于其他亚型。共有18项研究参与治疗相关不良事件的安全性评估。血小板减少和恶心是最常见的血液学和非血液学不良事件。分别。
    这项荟萃分析表明,HDAC抑制剂是未经治疗和R/RPTCL患者的有效治疗选择。在R/RPTCL设置中,HDAC抑制剂和化学疗法的组合显示出优于HDAC抑制剂单一疗法的疗效。此外,基于HDAC抑制剂的治疗在血管免疫母细胞性T细胞淋巴瘤患者中的疗效高于其他亚型。
    UNASSIGNED: The overall survival of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is dismal. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have exhibited promising treatment outcomes for PTCL patients. Therefore, this work aims to systematically evaluate the treatment outcome and safety profile of HDAC inhibitor-based treatment for untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) PTCL patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The prospective clinical trials of HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of PTCL were searched on the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library database. The pooled overall response rate, complete response (CR) rate, and partial response rate were measured. The risk of adverse events was evaluated. Moreover, the subgroup analysis was utilized to assess the efficacy among different HDAC inhibitors and efficacy in different PTCL subtypes.
    UNASSIGNED: For untreated PTCL, 502 patients in seven studies were involved, and the pooled CR rate was 44% (95% CI, 39-48%). For R/R PTCL patients, there were 16 studies included, and the CR rate was 14% (95% CI, 11-16%). The HDAC inhibitor-based combination therapy exhibited better efficacy when compared with HDAC inhibitor monotherapy for R/R PTCL patients (P = 0.02). In addition, the pooled CR rate was 17% (95% CI, 13-22%), 10% (95% CI, 5-15%), and 10% (95% CI, 5-15%) in the romidepsin, belinostat, and chidamide monotherapy subgroups, respectively. In the R/R angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma subgroup, the pooled ORR was 44% (95% CI, 35-53%), higher than other subtypes. A total of 18 studies were involved in the safety assessment of treatment-related adverse events. Thrombocytopenia and nausea were the most common hematological and non-hematological adverse events, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis demonstrated that HDAC inhibitors were effective treatment options for untreated and R/R PTCL patients. The combination of HDAC inhibitor and chemotherapy exhibited superior efficacy to HDAC inhibitor monotherapy in the R/R PTCL setting. Additionally, HDAC inhibitor-based therapy had higher efficacy in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma patients than that in other subtypes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    成人T细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(T-ALL)的维持治疗是最长的阶段,但选择有限。在维持阶段使用的经典药物,如6-巯基嘌呤,甲氨蝶呤,皮质类固醇和长春新碱具有潜在的严重毒性。在现代优化治疗,T-ALL患者的无化疗维持治疗方案可显著改善维持治疗前景.我们在此报告抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抗体和组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂的组合作为T-ALL患者的无化疗维持治疗,并进行文献综述。因此,除了有价值的信息之外,还提供了一个独特的视角,这些信息可能会为新的治疗方法提供信息。
    Maintenance therapy in adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is the longest phase but with limited option. The classic drugs used in the maintenance phase such as 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, corticosteroid and vincristine have potentially serious toxicities. Optimizing therapy in the modern age, chemo-free maintenance therapy regimens for patients with T-ALL may dramatically improve the maintenance therapeutic landscape. We report here the combination of Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody and histone deacetylase inhibitor as chemo-free maintenance treatment in a T-ALL patient with literature review, thus providing a unique perspective in addition to valuable information which may inform novel therapeutic approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂(HDACi)包括丙戊酸(VPA)具有通过表观遗传修饰和肿瘤细胞的放射敏化来提高放疗(RT)疗效和减少治疗不良事件(AE)的潜力。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估成人实体器官恶性肿瘤患者与HDACi用作放射增敏剂相关的疗效和不良事件。
    UNASSIGNED:系统审查利用了MEDLINE(Ovid)的电子搜索,Embase(Ovid),科克伦图书馆,和国际临床试验注册平台,以确定在接受RT的实体器官恶性肿瘤患者中,与HDACi治疗相关的疗效和AE的研究。进行荟萃分析,将总生存期(OS)报告为风险比(HR)作为主要结局指标。OS报告为中位生存差异,和AE是次要结局指标。
    UNASSIGNED:10项研究报告了HDACi在接受RT治疗的实体器官恶性肿瘤患者中的疗效和/或不良事件符合纳入标准。所有纳入的研究都集中在高级别神经胶质瘤患者的HDACi丙戊酸(VPA),其中9项研究(n=6138)评估了OS,5项研究(n=1055)检查了AE。在RT治疗方案中添加VPA可改善OS(HR=0.80,95%CI0.67-0.96)。没有针对非神经胶质瘤实体器官恶性肿瘤患者的研究,或非VPAHDACi符合本次审查的纳入标准.
    UNASSIGNED:本综述提示接受RT的神经胶质瘤患者可能由于给予HDACiVPA而经历延长的生存期。需要进一步的随机对照试验来验证这些发现。此外,有必要对HDACi放射辅助治疗在非胶质瘤实体器官恶性肿瘤中的应用进行更多研究.
    UNASSIGNED: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) including valproic acid (VPA) have the potential to improve radiotherapy (RT) efficacy and reduce treatment adverse events (AE) via epigenetic modification and radio-sensitization of neoplastic cells. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and AE associated with HDACi used as radio-sensitizers in adult solid organ malignancy patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review utilized electronic searches of MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase(Ovid), The Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify studies examining the efficacy and AEs associated with HDACi treatment in solid organ malignancy patients undergoing RT. Meta-analysis was performed with overall survival (OS) reported as hazard ratios (HR) as the primary outcome measure. OS reported as median survival difference, and AEs were secondary outcome measures.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten studies reporting on the efficacy and/or AEs of HDACi in RT-treated solid organ malignancy patients met inclusion criteria. All included studies focused on HDACi valproic acid (VPA) in high-grade glioma patients, of which 9 studies (n = 6138) evaluated OS and 5 studies (n = 1055) examined AEs. The addition of VPA to RT treatment protocols resulted in improved OS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.96). No studies focusing on non-glioma solid organ malignancy patients, or non-VPA HDACi met the inclusion criteria for this review.
    UNASSIGNED: This review suggests that glioma patients undergoing RT may experience prolonged survival due to HDACi VPA administration. Further randomized controlled trials are required to validate these findings. Additionally, more research into the use of HDACi radio-adjuvant treatment in non-glioma solid organ malignancies is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    海洋环境高度多样化,每个生物都在战斗建立和扩散。在海洋生物中,蓝藻是令人震惊的次级代谢产物生产者,代表了旨在交流的生物活性分子的奇妙来源,防御掠食者,或者竞争。对这些分子的起源和活动的研究是系统的,尽管仍有许多有待发现。它们广泛的化学多样性来自整合肽和聚酮合成酶和合成酶,伴随着生物合成转化的级联,产生了新的化学结构。蓝细菌是糖脂,大环内酯,肽,和聚酮化合物生产商,到目前为止,数百种分子已经被分离和测试。这些化合物中的许多已经证明了重要的生物活性,例如细胞毒性,抗肿瘤,和具有潜在药理用途的抗增殖活性。一些目前正在临床研究中。此外,传统的化疗治疗包括具有众所周知的副作用的药物,从新来源进行抗癌药物研究,比如海洋蓝细菌,必要的。本文综述了海洋蓝细菌产生的代谢产物的抗癌生物活性。强调代谢物家族的每个变体的识别,它们的化学结构,以及其生物和药理活性的作用机制。
    The marine environment is highly diverse, each living creature fighting to establish and proliferate. Among marine organisms, cyanobacteria are astounding secondary metabolite producers representing a wonderful source of biologically active molecules aimed to communicate, defend from predators, or compete. Studies on these molecules\' origins and activities have been systematic, although much is still to be discovered. Their broad chemical diversity results from integrating peptide and polyketide synthetases and synthases, along with cascades of biosynthetic transformations resulting in new chemical structures. Cyanobacteria are glycolipid, macrolide, peptide, and polyketide producers, and to date, hundreds of these molecules have been isolated and tested. Many of these compounds have demonstrated important bioactivities such as cytotoxicity, antineoplastic, and antiproliferative activity with potential pharmacological uses. Some are currently under clinical investigation. Additionally, conventional chemotherapeutic treatments include drugs with a well-known range of side effects, making anticancer drug research from new sources, such as marine cyanobacteria, necessary. This review is focused on the anticancer bioactivities of metabolites produced by marine cyanobacteria, emphasizing the identification of each variant of the metabolite family, their chemical structures, and the mechanisms of action underlying their biological and pharmacological activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变存在于世界卫生组织II和III级神经胶质瘤的70%中。IDH突变诱导瘤代谢物2-羟基戊二酸的积累。因此,针对逆转神经胶质瘤表观遗传失调的治疗方法已被提出.然而,表观遗传学治疗在神经胶质瘤中的应用尚不清楚.这里,我们首次对表观遗传疗法治疗IDH突变型神经胶质瘤进行了临床系统综述,并强调了其安全性和有效性.
    我们根据PRISMA指南,从2000年到2021年1月对电子数据库进行了系统搜索。文章进行了筛选,包括在病例报告中的表观遗传疗法的临床使用,前瞻性病例系列,或临床试验。主要和次要结局包括表观遗传疗法的安全性/耐受性和无进展生存期/总生存期。分别。
    在我们的分析中纳入了8项临床研究中的133名患者。IDH抑制剂似乎具有最佳的安全性,总体3级/4级不良事件率为9%。在非增强性神经胶质瘤中,对IDH突变抑制剂的反应率最高(55%的患者病情稳定)。相比之下,组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂的安全性较低,单一研究不良事件高达28%.
    鉴于其良性毒性特征和易于监测,IDH抑制剂似乎很有希望。组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂似乎具有狭窄的治疗指数,由于较低的浓度似乎无效,而增加剂量会产生严重的免疫抑制作用。初步数据表明,表观遗传疗法通常具有良好的耐受性,并且可以控制某些患者群体的疾病。比如那些没有增强的病变。
    Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy.
    We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively.
    A total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%.
    IDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A key event featured in the early stage of chronic gut inflammatory diseases is the disordered recruitment and excess accumulation of immune cells in the gut lamina propria. This process is followed by the over-secretion of pro-inflammatory factors and the prolonged overactive inflammatory responses. Growing evidence has suggested that gut inflammatory diseases may be mitigated by butyric acid (BA) or butyrate sodium (NaB). Laboratory studies show that BA and NaB can enhance gut innate immune function through G-protein-mediated signaling pathways while mitigating the overactive inflammatory responses by inhibiting histone deacetylase. The regulatory effects may occur in both epithelial enterocytes and the immune cells in the lamina propria. Prior to further clinical trials, comprehensive literature reviews and rigid examination concerning the underlying mechanism are necessary. To this end, we collected and reviewed 197 published reports regarding the mechanisms, bioactivities, and clinical effects of BA and NaB to modulate gut inflammatory diseases. Our review found insufficient evidence to guarantee the safety of clinical practice of BA and NaB, either by anal enema or oral administration of capsule or tablet. The safety of clinical use of BA and NaB should be further evaluated. Alternatively, dietary patterns rich in \"fruits, vegetables and beans\" may be an effective and safe approach to prevent gut inflammatory disease, which elevates gut microbiota-dependent production of BA. Our review provides a comprehensive reference to future clinical trials of BA and NaB to treat gut inflammatory diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    皮下脂膜炎样T细胞淋巴瘤(SPTCL)是一种罕见的原发性皮肤淋巴瘤,由CD8细胞毒性T细胞组成,主要位于皮下组织中。由于SPTCL的稀有性,目前尚无标准治疗方法。化疗,放射治疗,免疫抑制剂,造血干细胞移植(HSCT)已被频繁使用,然而,这些治疗方法的效果仍存在争议.在这份报告中,我们在一名47岁女性中发现了一例不寻常的SPTCL病例,其最初症状为非典型。病人开始服用依托泊苷,长春新碱,环磷酰胺,阿霉素,和泼尼松(EPOCH)化疗一旦诊断。经过两个周期的化疗,临床症状无明显改善.随后,组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)抑制剂西达胺从第三个周期开始加入化疗。经过4个周期的化疗联合西达本胺治疗后,患者逐渐恢复并达到完全缓解(CR)。其次是西达本胺单药治疗维持。治疗后超过1年,她留在CR。我们的案例说明,第一次,西达本胺可以是引起罕见SPTCL长期缓解的有效药物。
    Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a rare primary cutaneous lymphoma composed of CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell that is primarily localized in the subcutaneous tissue. No standard treatments are currently available for SPTCL due to its rarity. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunosuppressive agents, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been used frequently, however, the effects of these treatment approaches remain controversial. In this report, we present an unusual case of SPTCL in a 47-year-old woman whose initial symptoms were atypical. The patient was started on etoposide, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (EPOCH) chemotherapy once diagnosed. After two cycles of chemotherapy, her clinical symptoms were not significantly improved. Subsequently, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor chidamide was added to the chemotherapy from the third cycle. She recovered gradually and achieved complete remission (CR) after four cycles of chemotherapy combined with chidamide, followed by chidamide monotherapy for maintenance. More than 1 year after the therapy, she remained in CR. Our case illustrates, for the first time, chidamide can be an effective agent to induce long-term remission for rare SPTCL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are an aggressive and diverse group of lymphomas with a T-cell origin. Most patients progress following initial treatment and require salvage therapy. The burden of symptoms is high due to its extra-nodal presentation, high rate of advanced disease, and associated cytopenias combined with its predilection for an elderly population. The disease is generally incurable at relapse in the absence of transplantation and treatment is aimed at prolonging life and reducing disease-related symptoms. Belinostat is a histone deacetylate inhibitor that was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration on July 3, 2014, for the treatment of relapsed PTCL. Here, a systemic review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of belinostat. A safety analysis involved 512 patients with relapsed malignancies, and an efficacy analysis focused on patients with relapsed PTCL and included a total of 144 patients. Common adverse events were noted including fatigue (35%), nausea (42.8%), and vomiting (28.5%), but comparatively low rates of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity overall (6.4%). Efficacy analysis demonstrated an overall response rate of 25.7% and complete responses of 10.4% with the majority of discontinuations occurring for lack of efficacy. Ultimately, these results demonstrate that belinostat has comparable efficacy to other agents used in this setting and is well tolerated in regard to hematologic events, but there is limited data on patient-reported outcomes, reduction in disease-related symptoms, or quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To compare the efficacy and safety between hypomethylating agent (HMA) alone and the combination of HMA and histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
    We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available cohort studies regarding the comparison of HMA alone and in combination with HDACi for MDS and AML. Embase and Pubmed databases were searched for relevant studies. The overall hazard ratios for the HMA alone and HDACi combination were extracted. Heterogeneity among the included studies was evaluated by Cochrane\'s Q Test and I2 statistics. A random-effect model or a fixed-effect model was applied depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was used to evaluate the source of heterogeneity.
    Seven studies comprising 922 patients (458 patients treated with HMA alone and 464 with HMA and HDACi) were included in the analysis. Pooled data showed no significant differences in complete remission (CR) rates, hematologic improvement (HI), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicities between HMA alone treatment and HMA with HDACi regimens.
    HDACi and HMA combination does not appear to be more effective and better tolerated than HMA alone. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号