Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)

妊娠期糖尿病 (GDM)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:孕妇妊娠期糖尿病(GDM),胎龄新生儿小(SGA)和大(LGA)与母婴发病率增加相关.我们研究了GDM妊娠和对照组中不同水平的孕早期妊娠相关血浆蛋白A(PAPP-A)和游离β人绒毛膜促性腺激素(fβ-hCG)与SGA和LGA的关系。
    方法:共有23482名单胎妊娠妇女参加了2014年至2018年在芬兰北部进行的孕早期联合筛查,并被纳入这项回顾性病例对照研究。患有GDM的女性(n=4697)和没有GDM的对照组(n=18492)被分为低于第5和第10或高于第90和第95百分位数(pc)PAPP-A和fβ-hCGMoM水平的组。SGA定义为出生体重低于两个标准偏差(SD)以上,LGA高于性别特异性和胎龄特异性参考平均值两个SD以上。根据产妇年龄调整赔率(AOR),BMI,种族,IVF/ICSI,平等和吸烟。
    结果:在GDM妊娠中,SGA的比例为2.6%,LGA的比例为4.5%,与对照组的3.3%(p=0.011)和1.8%(p<0.001)相比,分别。在≤第5和≤第10pcPAPP-A组中,GDM组SGA的aOR分别为2.7(95%CI1.5-4.7)和2.2(95%CI1.4-3.5),参照组为3.8(95%CI3.0-4.9)和2.8(95%CI2.3-3.5),分别。当考虑LGA时,任何高PAPP-A组的aOR没有差异。在低≤5百分位的fβ-hCGMoM组中,对照组SGA的aOR为2.3(95%CI1.8-3.1)。在患有GDM的fβ-hCG组中,与SGA没有相关性,唯一的显着差异是≥90百分位数组,LGA的OR1.6(95%CI1.1-2.5)。
    结论:与低PAPP-A和SGA似乎存在相关性,尽管GDM状态。在有或没有GDM的女性中,高PAPP-A水平与LGA风险增加无关。低fβ-hCG水平仅在非GDM妊娠中与SGA相关。
    BACKGROUND: Maternal gestational diabetes (GDM), small (SGA) and large (LGA) for gestational age neonates are associated with increased morbidity in both mother and child. We studied how different levels of first trimester pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) were associated with SGA and LGA in GDM pregnancies and controls.
    METHODS: Altogether 23 482 women with singleton pregnancies participated in first trimester combined screening and delivered between 2014 and 2018 in Northern Finland and were included in this retrospective case-control study. Women with GDM (n = 4697) and controls without GDM (n = 18 492) were divided into groups below 5th and 10th or above 90th and 95th percentile (pc) PAPP-A and fβ-hCG MoM levels. SGA was defined as a birthweight more than two standard deviations (SD) below and LGA more than two SDs above the sex-specific and gestational age-specific reference mean. Odds ratios were adjusted (aOR) for maternal age, BMI, ethnicity, IVF/ICSI, parity and smoking.
    RESULTS: In pregnancies with GDM the proportion of SGA was 2.6% and LGA 4.5%, compared to 3.3% (p = 0.011) and 1.8% (p < 0.001) in the control group, respectively. In ≤ 5th and ≤ 10th pc PAPP-A groups, aORs for SGA were 2.7 (95% CI 1.5-4.7) and 2.2 (95% CI 1.4-3.5) in the GDM group and 3.8 (95% CI 3.0-4.9) and 2.8 (95% CI 2.3-3.5) in the reference group, respectively. When considering LGA, there was no difference in aORs in any high PAPP-A groups. In the low ≤ 5 percentile fβ-hCG MoM group, aORs for SGA was 2.3 (95% CI 1.8-3.1) in the control group. In fβ-hCG groups with GDM there was no association with SGA and the only significant difference was ≥ 90 percentile group, aOR 1.6 (95% CI 1.1-2.5) for LGA.
    CONCLUSIONS: Association with low PAPP-A and SGA seems to be present despite GDM status. High PAPP-A levels are not associated with increased LGA risk in women with or without GDM. Low fβ-hCG levels are associated with SGA only in non-GDM pregnancies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,患有妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的妇女容易发生认知功能障碍。我们研究了GDM对大鼠脑病理和脑早衰的影响。适应两周后,给7周大的雌性Sprague-Dawley大鼠喂食正常饮食(ND)或高脂肪饮食(HFD)。在妊娠第0天,HFD处理的大鼠接受链脲佐菌素(GDM组)或载体(肥胖母亲)。ND处理的大鼠接受媒介物(ND对照母亲)。在产后第21天,收集脑和血液。GDM组显示炎症和早衰标志物增加,线粒体变化,前额叶皮质和海马中血脑屏障和突触蛋白的代偿性增加。GDM引发母体脑部炎症和过早衰老,提示补偿机制可以防止这些影响。
    Previous studies showed that women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are susceptible to cognitive dysfunction. We investigated the effects of GDM on brain pathologies and premature brain aging in rats. Seven-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a normal diet (ND) or a high-fat diet (HFD) after two weeks of acclimatization. On pregnancy day 0, HFD-treated rats received streptozotocin (GDM group) or vehicle (Obese mothers). ND-treated rats received vehicle (ND-control mothers). On postpartum day 21, brains and blood were collected. The GDM group showed increased inflammatory and premature aging markers, mitochondrial changes, and compensatory increases in the blood-brain barrier and synaptic proteins in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. GDM triggers maternal brain inflammation and premature aging, suggesting compensatory mechanisms may protect against these effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是世界范围内最常见的妊娠并发症之一,患病率在全球范围内持续上升。重要的是,GDM不是单独的妊娠并发症。越来越多的证据表明GDM患者,与没有GDM的人相比,患有随后的2型糖尿病(T2D)和心血管疾病(CVD)的风险增加。GDM的风险存在很大的种族和民族差异。然而,种族和民族在GDM至T2D和CVD进展中的作用尚不清楚.本综述的目的是总结最近关于GDM及其对心脏代谢健康的生命周期影响的研究。包括1)GDM后发生T2D和CVD风险的高峰时间,2)GDM后心脏代谢疾病风险的种族和种族差异,3)生物合理性和潜在机制,和4)建议筛查和预防GDM患者的心脏代谢疾病,共同提供最新的评论,以指导未来的研究。
    结果:越来越多的证据表明,GDM患者患T2D的风险更大(7.4至9.6倍),高血压(高78%),GDM后的CDV事件(高于74%)比非GDM对应物。最近,一些研究还提示GDM可能略微增加死亡风险.现有证据表明,心血管疾病的关键危险因素,如血压,血浆葡萄糖,GDM患者产后<1年,血脂水平均升高。与正常血糖妊娠相比,在GDM指数妊娠后3-6年内,T2D和高血压的风险可能达到峰值。累积证据还表明,包括T2D在内的心脏代谢疾病的风险,高血压,GDM后的CVD事件因种族和民族而异。然而,在某些种族和族裔群体中,这种风险是否更高,以及这种模式是否可能因关注的产后心脏代谢结局而有所不同,目前尚不清楚.连接GDM和随后的T2D和CVD的潜在机制是复杂的,通常涉及多种途径及其相互作用,具体机制因不同种族和民族背景的个体而异。GDM患者的糖尿病和CVD风险筛查应在产后早期开始,并继续进行。如果可能,经常。不幸的是,GDM患者对产科医生或初级保健提供者进行产后血糖检测的依从性仍然较差.生命周期的观点可以提供关键信息,以解决产后筛查和干预措施中的临床和公共卫生差距,以预防GDM患者的T2D和CVD风险。未来的研究调查从GDM进展为心脏代谢疾病的种族和种族特异性风险以及包括生活方式在内的多领域因素的作用。生物,和社会背景因素有必要为高风险亚群提供量身定制和适合文化的干预措施。Further,检查GDM患者产后血糖检测的障碍对于有效预防心脏代谢疾病和增强终身健康至关重要.
    OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common pregnancy complications worldwide and the prevalence is continuously rising globally. Importantly, GDM is not an isolated complication of pregnancy. Growing evidence suggests that individuals with GDM, compared to those without GDM, have an increased risk of subsequent type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Substantial racial and ethnic disparities exist in the risk of GDM. However, the role of race and ethnicity in the progression from GDM to T2D and CVD remains unclear. The purpose of the current review is to summarize recent research about GDM and its life-course impacts on cardiometabolic health, including 1) the peak time of developing T2D and CVD risks after GDM, 2) the racial and ethnic disparities in the risk cardiometabolic diseases after GDM, 3) the biological plausibility and underlying mechanisms, and 4) recommendations for screening and prevention of cardiometabolic diseases among individuals with GDM, collectively to provide an updated review to guide future research.
    RESULTS: Growing evidence has indicated that individuals with GDM had greater risks of T2D (7.4 to 9.6 times), hypertension (78% higher), and CDV events (74% higher) after GDM than their non-GDM counterparts. More recently, a few studies also suggested that GDM could slightly increase the risk of mortality. Available evidence suggests that key CVD risk factors such as blood pressure, plasma glucose, and lipids levels are all elevated as early as < 1 year postpartum in individuals with GDM. The risk of T2D and hypertension is likely to reach a peak between 3-6 years after the index pregnancy with GDM compared to normal glycemia pregnancy. Cumulative evidence also suggests that the risk of cardiometabolic diseases including T2D, hypertension, and CVD events after GDM varies by race and ethnicity. However, whether the risk is higher in certain racial and ethnic groups and whether the pattern may vary by the postpartum cardiometabolic outcome of interest remain unclear. The underlying mechanisms linking GDM and subsequent T2D and CVD are complex, often involving multiple pathways and their interactions, with the specific mechanisms varying by individuals of different racial and ethnic backgrounds. Diabetes and CVD risk screening among individuals with GDM should be initiated early during postpartum and continue, if possible, frequently. Unfortunately, adherence to postpartum glucose testing with either obstetrician or primary care providers remained poor among individuals with GDM. A life-course perspective may provide critical information to address clinical and public health gaps in postpartum screening and interventions for preventing T2D and CVD risks in individuals with GDM. Future research investigating the racial- and ethnic-specific risk of progression from GDM to cardiometabolic diseases and the role of multi-domain factors including lifestyle, biological, and socio-contextual factors are warranted to inform tailored and culture-appropriate interventions for high-risk subpopulations. Further, examining the barriers to postpartum glucose testing among individuals with GDM is crucial for the effective prevention of cardiometabolic diseases and for enhancing life-long health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨血清孕酮,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),妊娠糖尿病(GDM)孕妇的胰岛素水平和胎膜早破(PROM)的风险。
    对52例同时伴有PROM的GDM患者(观察组)进行回顾性分析,并与89例诊断为GDM但未并发PROM的患者(对照组)进行比较。孕酮,胰岛素,检测到HbA1c。分析GDM患者发生PROM的危险因素。
    观察组HbA1c和空腹血糖水平均较高。血糖控制不良和GWG是GDM患者发生PROM的危险因素。PROM增加GDM的不良妊娠结局。HbA1c,胰岛素,HOMA-IR可以预测GDM患者发生PROM的风险。
    通过监测血清HbA1c,可以实现对早产胎膜早破的有效预测,胰岛素水平,GDM患者的胰岛素抵抗。
    To discuss the correlation between serum progesterone, glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c), and insulin levels in pregnant women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and the risk of Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM).
    A retrospective analysis was conducted on 52 patients diagnosed with GDM who also presented with PROM (Observation group) and compared with 89 patients diagnosed with GDM but not complicated with PROM (Control group). Progesterone, insulin, and HbA1c were detected. Risk factors for PROM in GDM patients were analyzed.
    The observation group had higher HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels. Poor blood glucose control and GWG are risk factors for PROM in GDM patients. PROM increases adverse pregnancy outcomes in GDM. HbA1c, insulin, and HOMA-IR can predict the risk of PROM in GDM.
    The effective prediction of preterm PROM can be achieved through the monitoring of serum HbA1c, insulin levels, and insulin resistance in patients with GDM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估以各种筛查标准诊断的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者的异质性。
    方法:我们使用连续的空腹血糖(FPG)和餐后2小时血糖(2hPPG)间隔为0.2mmol/L对孕妇进行分层。将新生儿出生体重异常和出生相关不良结局的发生率与无GDM的孕妇进行比较。
    结果:该研究包括39,988名孕妇(18-45岁,意思是[SD],31.5[4.7]年)在宁波,中国。妊娠24-28周FPG和2hPPG的平均值(SD)分别为4.5(0.5)和6.8(1.3)mmol/L,分别。共有3025名(7.6%)女性FPG为5.1-6.9mmol/L,4560名(11.4%)女性FPG为8.5-11.0mmol/L2hPPG。根据两种组合标准,GDM的发生率为17.3%(6908例)。根据5.1mmol/LFPG标准,<10百分位数出生体重(<10WT)的相对风险(RR)为0.82(95%CI,0.74-0.91,p<0.001),根据8.5mmol/L2hPPG标准为1.14(95%CI,1.06-1.23,p<0.001),而根据相应标准,>90百分位数出生体重(>90WT)的RR分别为1.48(95%CI,1.35-1.63,p<0.001)和0.95(95%CI,0.86-1.04,p=0.29)。与2hPPG标准相比,FPG标准与母体高血压的相关性更强。两项标准均未显示与其他复合不良结局的明显关联。
    结论:高FPG与高出生体重显著相关,而高2hPPG与低出生体重略有关联。我们的研究结果强调了不同标准诊断的GDM患者的异质性。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the heterogeneity of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients diagnosed with various screening criteria.
    METHODS: We stratified pregnant women using consecutive fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2hPPG) intervals of 0.2 mmol/L. The incidence of abnormal neonatal birthweight and birth-related adverse outcomes was compared with that of pregnant women without GDM.
    RESULTS: The study included 39,988 pregnant women (18-45 years, mean [SD], 31.5 [4.7] years) in Ningbo, China. The means (SDs) of FPG and 2hPPG within 24-28 weeks of gestation were 4.5 (0.5) and 6.8 (1.3) mmol/L, respectively. A total of 3025 (7.6%) women had 5.1-6.9 mmol/L FPG and 4560 (11.4%) had 8.5-11.0 mmol/L 2hPPG. The incidence of GDM according to the two combination criteria was 17.3% (6908 cases). The relative risk (RR) for < 10th percentile birthweight (< 10th WT) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.91, p < 0.001) by 5.1 mmol/L FPG criterion and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.06-1.23, p < 0.001) by 8.5 mmol/L 2hPPG criterion, while the RRs for > 90th percentile birthweight (> 90th WT) were 1.48 (95% CI, 1.35-1.63, p < 0.001) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-1.04, p = 0.29) according to the corresponding criteria. The FPG criterion was more strongly associated with maternal hypertension than the 2hPPG criterion. Both criteria did not show a distinct association with other composite adverse outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: High FPG is significantly associated with high birth weight, whereas high 2hPPG is slightly associated with low birth weight. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of patients with GDM diagnosed by different criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的妊娠疾病,与先兆子痫和巨大儿的风险增加有关。最近的研究表明,胎盘滋养层中过量脂质的积累会损害线粒体功能。然而,影响胎盘滋养细胞的确切脂质及其潜在机制尚不清楚.高雄医科大学医院招募GDM病例和健康对照。在出生时采集胎盘和脐带血。使用共聚焦和电子显微镜检查胎盘和线粒体的形态。我们使用液相色谱-质谱法以数据独立分析模式(LC/MSE)测定脂质组成。在绒毛膜癌细胞(JEG3)上进行了体外研究,以研究滋养细胞线粒体功能障碍的机制。结果表明,GDM胎盘的特征是合胞体结增加,脉络膜病,凝集素样氧化低密度脂蛋白(LDL)受体-1(LOX-1)过表达,和线粒体功能障碍。溶血磷脂酰胆碱(LPC)16:0在GDM患者的脐带血LDL中显著升高。体外,我们证明LPC剂量依赖性地通过增加活性氧(ROS)水平和HIF-1α信号传导来破坏线粒体功能。总之,脐带血中高度升高的LPC在GDM中起着关键作用,导致滋养细胞损伤和妊娠并发症。
    Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy disorder associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia and macrosomia. Recent research has shown that the buildup of excess lipids within the placental trophoblast impairs mitochondrial function. However, the exact lipids that impact the placental trophoblast and the underlying mechanism remain unclear. GDM cases and healthy controls were recruited at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. The placenta and cord blood were taken during birth. Confocal and electron microscopy were utilized to examine the morphology of the placenta and mitochondria. We determined the lipid composition using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in data-independent analysis mode (LC/MSE). In vitro studies were carried out on choriocarcinoma cells (JEG3) to investigate the mechanism of trophoblast mitochondrial dysfunction. Results showed that the GDM placenta was distinguished by increased syncytial knots, chorangiosis, lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-1 (LOX-1) overexpression, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) 16:0 was significantly elevated in the cord blood LDL of GDM patients. In vitro, we demonstrated that LPC dose-dependently disrupts mitochondrial function by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and HIF-1α signaling. In conclusion, highly elevated LPC in cord blood plays a pivotal role in GDM, contributing to trophoblast impairment and pregnancy complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是探讨妊娠早期血清尿酸(UA)水平与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)发生的关系。并进一步探讨是否存在因果关系。
    方法:684例GDM孕妇和1162例非GDM孕妇参与本研究。311名GDM孕妇和311名匹配对照者被纳入1:1病例对照研究。我们使用条件逻辑回归来探讨UA水平与发生GDM风险之间的关系。通过两个样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析检查了两者之间的因果关系。
    结果:在1:1匹配的人群中,与UA水平的极端三分位数相比,GDM的比值比(OR)为1.967(95%置信区间[CI]:1.475-2.625;P<0.001)。受限制的三次样条分析显示,当UA超过222µmol/L时,UA与GDM之间呈线性关系。GDM和UA水平在不同的分层回归分析中保持统计学显著的正相关(P<0.001)。然而,MR分析未发现尿酸与GDM之间存在因果关系的证据,UA每增加单位OR为1.06(95%CI:0.91~1.25).
    结论:妊娠早期UA水平与随后发生GDM的风险呈正相关。然而,没有发现遗传证据支持UA和GDM之间的因果关系.
    OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore the relationship between serum uric acid (UA) levels in early pregnancy and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to further explore whether there is a causal relationship.
    METHODS: 684 pregnant women with GDM and 1162 pregnant women without GDM participated in this study. 311 pregnant women with GDM and 311 matched controls were enrolled in a 1:1 case-control study. We used conditional logistic regression to explore the relationship between UA levels and the risk of developing GDM. The causal relationship between the two was examined by two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
    RESULTS: In the 1:1 matched population, the odds ratio (OR) of developing GDM compared with the extreme tertiles of UA levels was 1.967 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.475-2.625; P < 0.001). Restricted cubic spline analyses showed a linear relationship between UA and GDM when UA exceeded 222 µmol/L. GDM and UA levels maintained a statistically significant positive correlation in different stratified regression analyses (P < 0.001). However, no evidence of a causal relationship between uric acid and GDM was found by MR analyses with an OR of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.91-1.25) per unit increase in UA.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is a positive correlation between UA levels in early pregnancy and the subsequent risk of developing GDM. However, no genetic evidence was found to support a cause-effect relationship between UA and GDM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    妊娠相关的暴发性1型糖尿病(PF)发生在怀孕期间或分娩后2周内。虽然它很少发生,它与高胎儿死亡率有关。很少有研究检查PF是否与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)有关。
    一名29岁的女性在妊娠24周时被诊断为GDM,出现了发烧,喉咙痛,妊娠29周时恶心和呕吐。根据她的血酮和葡萄糖水平以及血气分析结果,认为酮症酸中毒。由于患者的胰岛功能迅速下降,补液,胰岛素治疗,和其他治疗。患者最终被诊断为PF,并且需要持续的胰岛素治疗。她在妊娠37周时通过选择性剖宫产分娩了一个健康的女婴。自急性发作以来的12个月中,她的血糖得到了令人满意的控制。
    PF的特点是母婴结局差,死胎率高。GDM孕妇应定期监测血糖。血糖突然升高可能表明PF的可能性,需要及时处理,以避免不良妊娠结局。
    UNASSIGNED: Pregnancy-associated fulminant type 1 diabetes (PF) occurs during pregnancy or within 2 weeks of delivery. Although it occurs infrequently, it is associated with high fetal mortality rate. Few studies have examined whether PF is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
    UNASSIGNED: A 29-year-old woman diagnosed with GDM at 24 weeks of gestation developed a fever, sore throat, nausea and vomiting at 29 weeks of gestation. Ketoacidosis was considered based on her blood ketone and glucose levels and the results of a blood gas analysis. Since the patient\'s islet function declined rapidly, fluid replacement, insulin therapy, and other treatments were administered. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with PF, and has required ongoing insulin therapy. She delivered a healthy baby girl by elective cesarean section at 37-week gestation. Her blood glucose has been satisfactorily controlled over the 12 months since her acute presentation.
    UNASSIGNED: PF is characterized by poor maternal and infant outcomes and a high stillbirth rate. Blood glucose should be regularly monitored in pregnant women with GDM. A sudden increase in blood glucose may indicate the possibility of PF, which needs to be managed in a timely manner to avoid adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于预先存在的2型糖尿病(T2DM)和妊娠糖尿病(GDM)引起的妊娠高血糖在全球范围内随着代谢疾病危险因素的增加而上升。这篇综述总结了目前来自国家和国际T2DM和GDM诊断和管理指南的证据和建议,以优化孕产妇和新生儿结局。
    Hyperglycemia in pregnancy due to pre-existing Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising globally with increasing rates of risk factors for metabolic disease. This review summarizes current evidence and recommendations from national and international guidelines for diagnosis and management of T2DM and GDM to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的孕妇比健康孕妇经历更高的心理压力水平。本研究的目的是检查(1)焦虑的差异,抑郁症,压力,诊断为GDM的妇女和健康孕妇之间的躯体化水平,(2)焦虑的差异,抑郁症,压力,与血糖控制良好的女性相比,血糖控制良好的女性的躯体化水平。
    方法:进行了定量横断面研究,涉及103名至少怀孕过一次的妇女,包括40名诊断为GDM的妇女和63名健康孕妇。分发了一份在线问卷,其中包括三个部分:社会人口统计学参数,DASS-21问卷评估焦虑,抑郁症,和压力,和评估躯体化的简短症状量表(BSI)问卷。
    结果:焦虑的差异(t=14.470,<0.001),抑郁(t=8.17,<0.001),应力(t=16.354,<0.001),发现GDM诊断女性和健康孕妇之间的躯体化水平(t=13.679,<0.001)。诊断为GDM的女性报告焦虑水平更高,抑郁症,压力,与没有GDM的人相比,躯体化。此外,血糖控制更好的女性,如较低的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平所示,焦虑情绪较低(t(38)=-2.04,p<0.05),抑郁(t(38)=-2.88,p<0.01),应力(t(38)=-1.88,p<0.05),与血糖控制较差的女性相比,躯体化水平(t(38)=-1.88,p<0.05)。
    结论:诊断为GDM的孕妇报告较高水平的负面心理健康状况,例如焦虑,抑郁症,压力,与健康孕妇相比,躯体化。
    BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) experience higher psychological stress levels than healthy pregnant women. The objectives of the current study were to examine (1) the differences in anxiety, depression, stress, and somatization levels between women diagnosed with GDM and healthy pregnant women, and (2) the differences in anxiety, depression, stress, and somatization levels among women with well-controlled blood sugar levels compared to those who are not well controlled.
    METHODS: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 103 women who had been pregnant at least once, including 40 women diagnosed with GDM and 63 healthy pregnant women. An online questionnaire was distributed that included three parts: socio-demographic parameters, the DASS-21 questionnaire assessing anxiety, depression, and stress, and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) questionnaire assessing somatization.
    RESULTS: Differences in the anxiety (t = 14.470, <0.001), depression (t = 8.17, <0.001), stress (t = 16.354, <0.001), and somatization (t = 13.679, <0.001) levels between women diagnosed with GDM and healthy pregnant women were found. Women diagnosed with GDM reported higher levels of anxiety, depression, stress, and somatization compared to those without GDM. Additionally, women with better blood sugar control, as indicated by lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels had lower anxiety (t (38) = -2.04, p < 0.05), depression (t(38) = -2.88, p < 0.01), stress (t(38) = -1.88, p < 0.05), and somatization (t(38) = -1.88, p < 0.05) levels compared to women with poorer blood sugar control.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women diagnosed with GDM report higher levels of negative mental health conditions such as anxiety, depression, stress, and somatization compared to healthy pregnant women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号