Depression is among the most common psychiatric illnesses, which imposes a major socioeconomic burden on patients, caregivers, and the public health system. Treatment with classical antidepressants (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors), which primarily affect monoaminergic systems has several limitations, such as delayed onset of action and moderate efficacy in a relatively large proportion of depressed patients. Furthermore, depression is highly heterogeneus, and its different subtypes, including post-partum depression, involve distinct neurobiology, warranting a differential approach to pharmacotherapy. Given these shortcomings, the need for novel antidepressants that are superior in efficacy and faster in onset of action is fully justified. The development and market introduction of rapid-acting antidepressants has accelerated in recent years. Some of these new antidepressants act through the GABAergic system. In this review, we discuss the discovery, efficacy, and limitations of treatment with classic antidepressants. We provide a detailed discussion of GABAergic neurotransmission, with a special focus on GABAA receptors, and possible explanations for the mood-enhancing effects of GABAergic medications (in particular neurosteroids acting at GABAA receptors), and ultimately, we present the most promising molecules belonging to this family which are currently used in clinical practice or are in late phases of clinical development.

1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive technique that can be used to quantify the concentrations of metabolites in the brain in vivo. MRS findings in the context of autism are inconsistent and conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of MRS studies measuring glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), as well as brain metabolites involved in energy metabolism (glutamine, creatine), neural and glial integrity (e.g. n-acetyl aspartate (NAA), choline, myo-inositol) and oxidative stress (glutathione) in autism cohorts. Data were extracted and grouped by metabolite, brain region and several other factors before calculation of standardised effect sizes. Overall, we find significantly lower concentrations of GABA and NAA in autism, indicative of disruptions to the balance between excitation/inhibition within brain circuits, as well as neural integrity. Further analysis found these alterations are most pronounced in autistic children and in limbic brain regions relevant to autism phenotypes. Additionally, we show how study outcome varies due to demographic and methodological factors , emphasising the importance of conforming with standardised consensus study designs and transparent reporting.

Stiripentol (Diacomit®) (STP) is an orally active antiseizure medication (ASM) indicated as adjunctive therapy, for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome (DS), a severe form of childhood epilepsy, in conjunction with clobazam and, in some regions valproic acid. Since the discovery of STP, several mechanisms of action (MoA) have been described that may explain its specific effect on seizures associated with DS. STP is mainly considered as a potentiator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission: (i) via uptake blockade, (ii) inhibition of degradation, but also (iii) as a positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors, especially those containing α3 and δ subunits. Blockade of voltage-gated sodium and T-type calcium channels, which is classically associated with anticonvulsant and neuroprotective properties, has also been demonstrated for STP. Finally, several studies indicate that STP could regulate glucose energy metabolism and inhibit lactate dehydrogenase. STP is also an inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of other ASMs, contributing to boost their anticonvulsant efficacy as add-on therapy. These different MoAs involved in treatment of DS and recent data suggest a potential for STP to treat other neurological or non-neurological diseases.

Arising out of a PhD project more than 50 years ago to synthesise analogues of the neurotransmitter GABA, a series of new chemical entities were found to have selective actions on ionotropic GABA receptors. Several of these neurochemicals are now commercially available. A new subtype of these receptors was discovered that could be a target for the treatment of myopia, the facilitation of learning and memory, and the improvement of post-stroke motor recovery. The development of these new chemical entities over many years demonstrates the importance of neurochemicals with which to investigate selective aspects of GABA receptors and illustrates the significance of collaboration between chemists and biologists in neurochemistry. Vital were the improvements in synthetic organic chemistry and the use of functional human receptors expressed in oocytes. Current interest in ionotropic GABA receptors includes the clinical development of subtype-specific agents and the role of gain-of-function receptor variants in epilepsy. Dietary flavonoids were found to cross the blood-brain barrier to influence brain function. Natural and synthetic flavonoids had a range of effects on GABA receptors, ranging from positive, silent, and negative allosteric modulators, to even second-order modulation of first-order modulators. Flavonoids have been called \"a new family of benzodiazepines.\" Like benzodiazepines, flavonoids reduce stress. Stress produces changes in GABA receptors in the brain that may be because of changes in endogenous modulators, such as neurosteroids and corticosteroids. GABA also occurs naturally in the diet leading to studies of the effects of oral GABA on brain function. This finding has resulted in studies of GABA and related neurochemicals as neuro-nutraceuticals. GABA systems in the gut microbiome are essential to such studies. The actions of oral GABA and of GABA-enriched beverages and foodstuffs are now an area of considerable scientific and commercial interest. GABA is a deceptively simple chemical that can take up many shapes, which may underlie its complex functions. The need for new chemical entities with selective actions for further studies highlights the need for continuing collaboration between chemists and biologists.

The mild-natured and bitter-flavored traditional Chinese medicines (MB-TCMs) are an important class of TCMs that have been widely used in clinical practice and recognized as safe long-term treatments for chronic diseases. However, as an important class of TCMs, the panorama of pharmacological effects and the mechanisms of MB-TCMs have not been systemically reviewed. Compelling studies have shown that gut microbiota can mediate the therapeutic activity of TCMs and help to elucidate the core principles of TCM medicinal theory. In this systematic review, we found that MB-TCMs commonly participated in the modulation of metabolic syndrome, intestinal inflammation, nervous system disease and cardiovascular system disease in association with promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria Bacteroides, Akkermansia, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Roseburia as well as inhibiting the proliferation of harmful bacteria Helicobacter, Enterococcus, Desulfovibrio and Escherichia-Shigella. These alterations, correspondingly, enhance the generation of protective metabolites, mainly including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acid (BAs), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), indole and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and inhibit the generation of harmful metabolites, such as proinflammatory factors trimethylamine oxide (TAMO) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), to further exert multiplicative effects for the maintenance of human health through several different signaling pathways. Altogether, this present review has attempted to comprehensively summarize the relationship between MB-TCMs and gut microbiota by establishing the TCMs-gut microbiota-metabolite-signaling pathway-diseases axis, which may provide new insight into the study of TCM medicinal theories and their clinical applications.

β-Phenyl-γ-aminobutyric acid (phenibut) is an analog of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) that was first synthesized in Russia in the early 1960s. It is marketed as a nootropic (smart drug) to improve cognitive performance, and to treat generalized and social anxiety, insomnia, and alcohol withdrawal. The use of phenibut is legal in the USA and it is widely available online without a prescription. Increased public awareness of phenibut has led to a growing number of reports of acute intoxication and withdrawal. In this review, we describe the pharmacology of phenibut, the presentation and management of acute intoxication, and regulatory issues, placing particular emphasis on the treatment of acute withdrawal, for which there are no comparative studies. Among 29 cases of phenibut withdrawal, patients were successfully treated with baclofen, benzodiazepines, and phenobarbital, as individual agents or in various combinations. Ancillary medications included antipsychotics, dexmedetomidine, gabapentin, and pregabalin. After stabilization, a number of patients did well on baclofen tapers, whereas others were weaned off benzodiazepines or phenobarbital. Phenobarbital may be preferred over baclofen, or used as an added agent, in patients at risk for seizures. As long as phenibut remains legal, cases of phenibut intoxication and withdrawal are likely to increase. As urine or plasma drug screening for phenibut is not widely available, it is vital that clinicians obtain a detailed medication history in patients presenting to the emergency department with nonspecific symptoms that may represent phenibut intoxication or withdrawal. Further, clinicians may wish to consult an addiction specialist or toxicologist in these situations.

UNASSIGNED: Phenibut is an unregulated supplement that acts primarily as a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist. Use of phenibut can lead to dependence and subsequent withdrawal when use is stopped. Phenibut withdrawal can cause severe symptoms such as delirium, hallucinations, and seizures. The purpose of this systematic review is to characterize the natural history of phenibut withdrawal and summarize treatment strategies published in the literature.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist. English language peer-reviewed articles or conference abstracts in humans describing phenibut withdrawal after cessation of use were included. Databases (Ovid/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Science Direct) and references of included articles were searched. Case reports were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports. Patient demographics and key outcomes, including withdrawal characteristics and treatment characteristics, were collected into a predefined data collection sheet by six independent reviewers.
UNASSIGNED: Search results yielded 515 articles of which 25 were included. All articles were case reports or published conference abstracts. All of the cases (100 percent) involved male patients and the median age was 30 years, (interquartile range 23.5-34 years, range 4 days-68 years). The median daily phenibut dose prior to experiencing withdrawal was 10 g (interquartile range 4.75-21.5 g, range 1-200 g). The shortest duration of phenibut use (2-3 g daily) prior to withdrawal was one week. Withdrawal symptoms occurred as quickly as two hours after the last phenibut dose. Sixteen patients (64 percent) reported progression of withdrawal severity within the first 24 hours of healthcare contact. Seizures were reported in two patients (8 percent), intubation in six patients (24 percent), and intensive care unit admission in 11 patients (44 percent). Withdrawal patterns and outcomes were similar in those using phenibut alone and those with comorbid polysubstance use. Withdrawal treatment strategies varied widely. Only three cases (12 percent) were managed outpatient and all three utilized a phenibut tapering strategy. All patients undergoing medication-assisted abstinence were admitted inpatient for symptom management and received a drug that acts on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors. The most commonly used medication was a benzodiazepine, reported in 17 cases (68 percent). Nineteen patients (76 percent) required at least two drug therapies to manage symptoms. Baclofen was used in 15 cases (60 percent), primarily in conjunction with gamma-aminobutyric acid type A agonists (12 of 15 cases) or as monotherapy during a phenibut taper (two of 15 cases). Two patients using baclofen monotherapy outpatient, after initial stabilization with multiple drug classes, reported adverse effects. One patient had a seizure and the other experienced recurrent withdrawal symptoms, returned to using phenibut, and was admitted to a hospital for withdrawal symptom management with benzodiazepines.
UNASSIGNED: This review is subject to several limitations. Due to the manual nature of article selection, it is possible relevant articles may not have been included. As the entire data set is comprised of case reports it may suffer from publications bias. Outcomes and meaningful conclusions from specific treatment strategies were rarely available because of the heterogeneous nature of case reports. It is possible those reporting only phenibut use were actually using multiple substances. The doses of phenibut a user believed they were taking may be different from what was present in the unregulated product.
UNASSIGNED: Phenibut withdrawal appears to have a range of severity. It is important to recognize that patients undergoing phenibut abstinence may have progressive symptom worsening during early withdrawal. All published cases of abrupt phenibut abstinence were admitted inpatients for symptom management. Benzodiazepines or barbiturates with adjunctive baclofen appear to be the most commonly used drugs for moderate to severe withdrawal. Outpatient management via slow phenibut tapers with or without adjunctive gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist therapy may be successful. However, there is no standard treatment, and consultation with experts (e.g., toxicologists, addiction specialists) experienced in managing withdrawal syndromes is recommended. Significant study is warranted to develop methods of triaging phenibut withdrawal (e.g., severity scoring, inpatient versus outpatient management) and creating optimal treatment regimens.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin has shown benefits for a variety of pain etiologies in adult patients, with off-label use as an adjunctive agent in pediatric patients occurring more frequently.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the studies which evaluate safety and efficacy of gabapentin for the treatment of pediatric pain.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted via PubMed query with controlled vocabulary and key terms using indexed medical subject heading.
METHODS: Prospective studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2023, were selected utilizing a predetermined exclusion criteria independently by 2 authors, with a third independent author available for discrepancies.
METHODS: Data extraction was performed by 2 authors independently to include study design, patient population and characteristics, drug dosing, and outcomes. Studies were then assessed for their independent risk of bias utilizing the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach to risk of bias.
RESULTS: A total of 11 studies describing 195 pediatric patients who received gabapentin were included. Of the 11 studies, 9 were randomized controlled trials, 1 was a prospective multicenter study, and 1 was an open-label pilot study.
CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity of pain type and gabapentin dosing regimens within the included studies made conclusions difficult to quantify. Efficacy likely depends significantly on etiology of pain; however, per these studies, gabapentin is likely safe to use for a variety of pediatric patient populations as a multimodal agent.

Single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (SV 1 H-MRS) is an in vivo noninvasive imaging technique used to detect neurotransmitters and metabolites. It enables repeated measurements in living participants to build explanatory neurochemical models of psychiatric symptoms and testing of therapeutic approaches. Given the tight link among glutamate, gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), glutathione and glutamine within the cellular machinery, MRS investigations of neurocognitive and psychiatric disorders must quantify a network of metabolites simultaneously to capture the pathophysiological states of interest. Metabolite-selective sequences typically provide improved metabolite isolation and spectral modelling simplification for a single metabolite at a time. Non-metabolite-selective sequences provide information on all detectable human brain metabolites, but feature many signal overlaps and require complicated spectral modelling. Although there are short-echo time (TE) MRS sequences that do not use spectral editing and are optimised to target either glutamate, GABA or glutathione, these approaches usually imply a precision tradeoff for the remaining two metabolites. Given the interest in assessing psychiatric and neurocognitive diseases that involve excitation-inhibition imbalances along with oxidative stress, there is a need to survey the literature on the quantification precision of current metabolite-selective MRS techniques. In this review, we locate and describe 17 studies that report on the quality of simultaneously acquired MRS metabolite data in the human brain. We note several factors that influence the data quality for single-shot acquisition of multiple metabolites of interest using metabolite-selective MRS: (1) internal in vivo references; (2) brain regions of interests; (3) field strength of scanner; and/or (4) optimised acquisition parameters. We also highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various SV spectroscopy techniques that were able to quantify in vivo glutamate, GABA and glutathione simultaneously. The insights from this review will assist in the development of new MRS pulse sequences for simultaneous, selective measurements of these metabolites and simplified spectral modelling.

The primary inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) has a prominent role in regulating neural development and function, with disruption to GABAergic signalling linked to behavioural phenotypes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly autism. Such neurochemical disruption, likely resulting from diverse genetic and molecular mechanisms, particularly during early development, can subsequently affect the cellular balance of excitation and inhibition in neuronal circuits, which may account for the social processing difficulties observed in autism and related conditions. This comprehensive narrative review integrates diverse streams of research from several disciplines, including molecular neurobiology, genetics, epigenetics, and systems neuroscience. In so doing it aims to elucidate the relevance of inhibitory dysfunction to autism, with specific focus on social processing difficulties that represent a core feature of this disorder. Many of the social processing difficulties experienced in autism have been linked to higher levels of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate and/or lower levels of inhibitory GABA. While current therapeutic options for social difficulties in autism are largely limited to behavioural interventions, this review highlights the psychopharmacological studies that explore the utility of GABA modulation in alleviating such difficulties.