BACKGROUND: Medical Child Abuse (MCA) is a severe form of child abuse. In MCA, the caregiver abuses the child by exaggerating, fabricating, simulating, or inducing symptoms, and unnecessary, potentially harmful medical care harms the child. Bleeding is one of the most common manifestations of MCA. Diagnosis of MCA is challenging, and late diagnosis may increase the severity and complications. Once suspected, it is essential to apply all relevant methods of investigation to support and confirm the diagnosis, as soon as possible, as late diagnosis increases the risks.
METHODS: An 18-month-old boy was referred to the Pediatric Hematology by the Department of the Emergency with multiple admissions in a 2-week period for recurrent said-to-be bleeding episodes from different sites. Previously, he had been investigated for recurrent bleeding episodes in different hospitals for 4 months. In our center, the review of medical history, examination findings, and laboratory results showed some important inconsistencies leading to suspicion of MCA and the mother as the perpetrator. Then he was hospitalized for close observation. During hospitalization, multiple episodes of said-to-be bleeding were reported by the mother, but active bleeding was never observed by any hospital staff. No bleeding foci were detected in the nose or ears, supporting the diagnosis of MCA. After the file was forwarded to the prosecutor\'s office, the child was taken for institutional care, and no further bleeding was observed after separation from the mother. DNA, which was obtained from a so-called nosebleed during hospitalization, was analyzed and was reported to belong to the mother, confirming the diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: This case report draws attention to timely diagnoses by focusing on inconsistencies in the history and clinical signs and good clinical practices for the management of MCA, with a special emphasis on collecting evidence, including DNA samples, to confirm the diagnosis and help the legal process.

False claims of having an intersex condition have been observed in print, video, Internet media, and in live presentations. Claims of being intersexed in publicly accessible media were examined and evidence that they were false was considered sufficiently conclusive in 37 cases. Falsity was most often detected due to medical implausibility and/or inconsistency, but sometimes also using information from third-party or published sources. The majority, 26/37, of cases were natal males; 11/37 were natal females. Almost all (34/37) were transgendered, living, or aspiring to live, in their non-natal sex or as socially intergender. The most commonly claimed diagnosis was ovotesticular disorder (\"true hermaphroditism\") due to chimerism, an actually uncommon cause of authentic intersexuality. Motivations for pretending to be intersexed were inferred from statements and behaviors and were varied. Some such pretenders appear to be avoiding the external or internalized stigma of an actual transgendered condition. Some appear, similarly to persons with factitious disorder, to be seeking attention and/or the role of a sick, disadvantaged, or victimized person. Some showed evidence of paraphilia, most frequently autogynephilia, and, in several cases, paraphilic diaperism. For some cases, such claims had been accepted as authentic by journalists or social scientists and repeated as true in published material.

Self-mutilation lesions can represent a clinical diagnosis challenge for healthcare professionals, as patients do not admit to self-mutilation. This leads to failed diagnoses due to the similarity of this condition to other diseases. Searches on the subject were carried out at the PubMed, Periódicos Capes, Scopus, Science Direct and WoS databases, according to the following inclusion criteria: articles in English, Portuguese or Spanish, published from 2018 to June 2023, encompassing case reports, case series and literature reviews. Men are slight more affected by self-mutilation injuries, also presenting the most serious lesions. Self-mutilation injuries are reported globally, mostly in the Asian and American continents. Clinical presentations are varied, but morphology is, in most cases, associated to the form/instrument used for self-mutilation. Greater evidence of diagnosed mental disorders in women and underreporting of these cases in men due to low demands for specialized treatment are noted. A higher prevalence of self-mutilation lesions was verified for men, affecting a wide age range, with the highest number of cases in the USA. The most affected body areas are arms and external genitalia, mostly due to knife use. An association between self-mutilation injuries and mental disorders is clear, with most cases being previously undiagnosed.

暂无摘要。

Patients with factitious disorder imposed on self (FDIS) seek medical care for deliberately falsified problems. Although a large amount of work has been published, the scientific literature lacks robust data on FDIS. The present study aimed to estimate the annual mean of in-hospital FDIS codings in France, describe the sociodemographic characteristics of subjects with FDIS, assess healthcare utilisation and medical nomadism, and describe the pathologies most frequently associated with FDIS.
Subjects with at least one coding of FDIS in French health insurance databases between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017 were included. Subjects younger than 18 years of age at the time of first coding were excluded from the study. Sociodemographic data of subjects and diagnoses associated with the first coding of FDIS were collected. Healthcare utilisation and medical nomadism were analysed descriptively from one year before to one year after the first FDIS coding.
2232 subjects were included, representing an average of 248 new in-hospital FDIS codings per year. The subjects included were 58.2% female. The mean age at diagnosis was 48.5 years. In the year following the first coding of FDIS, 1268 subjects (56.8%) were re-hospitalised at least once, including 159 (7.1%) with at least one new coding for FDIS. From one year before to one year after the first coding of FDIS, 66% of the subjects included had received at least one prescription for benzodiazepines, 58.3% for antidepressants, and 42.6% for antipsychotics.
Our findings bring new data working towards a better understanding of FDIS. The consumption of psychotropic drugs is particularly frequent in patients with FDIS.

BACKGROUND: There is a high prevalence of somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms. When it comes to deciding whether a patient is able to work, it is essential to differentiate a somatoform disorder from a factitious disorder. The case presented demonstrates the impact on disability benefits and the subsequent psychosocial repercussions of misdiagnosing between a factitious disorder and a somatoform disorder.
METHODS: A 42-year-old Caucasian woman worked as a 100% fiduciary accountant until the age of 32 when she was placed on medical leave due to persistent trigeminal neuralgia. Afterward, she developed total blindness, not explained by a physiological process, accompanied by distress in a crucial emotional context. We evaluated the patient for a revision of a disability income after a diagnosis of factitious disorder with severe consequences such as disability income suspension and family conflict. Our psychiatric examination concluded the diagnoses of pain disorders related to psychological factors and a dissociative neurological symptom disorder with visual disturbance.
CONCLUSIONS: Blindness not explained by a physiological process may accompany trauma and psychological distress. Differentiating this pathology from factitious disorder or simulation is essential from an insurance medicine point of view, but also for its treatment.

We present the case of a young woman with an extensive medical history that most notably includes over 60 emergency-room visits for unfounded respiratory distress that often prompted intubations. Each presentation displays elements of deceitfulness or inappropriate demands that align with factitious disorder imposed on self. Top experts in the Consultation-Liaison field provide guidance for this commonly encountered clinical case based on their experience and review of available literature. Key teaching topics include a review of risk factors for development of deceptive syndromes, distinguishing factitious disorder from malingering and conversion disorder, and the role of a consulting psychiatrist in such cases. Patients with factitious disorder often show signs of pathologic lying, obstinance, and erratic behavior. Such attributes frequently arouse negative countertransference in providers, causing frustration and dread with continuing care, rendering psychiatric involvement. We address the unique challenges in managing factitious disorder and how to effectively collaborate with an interdisciplinary inpatient team with these cases.

Functional neurological disorders (FND) have long been a challenge for medicine, both on clinical and psychodynamic point of view. The medico-legal issue is often relegated to the background in medicine, and FND patients also suffer from such neglected topic. Nonetheless, despite the difficulty to properly diagnose FND and the numerous associated organic and/or psychiatric comorbidities, FND patients report a significant level of deficiency and a high alteration of quality of life when compared to other well-recognized chronic disorders such as Parkinson\'s disease or epilepsy. Whether it is for the estimation of a personal injury, a prejudice, after-effects following a medical accident or certain legal contexts requiring the elimination of a factitious disorder or a simulation, the uncertainty and imprecision in the medico-legal assessment can imply notable consequences on the patient. In this article, we propose to define the different medico-legal contexts in which FND can occur that of the legal expert, that of the consulting physician, that of the so-called recourse physician and finally that of the attending physician who can provide detailed medical files to the patient in order to help him/her in his/her procedures. We then explain how to use standardized objective evaluation tools validated by the learned societies and how to encourage multidisciplinary cross-evaluation. Finally, we specify how to differentiate FND from historically FND-associated disorders (factitious and simulated disorders), through the clinical criteria, considering the difficulties linked to the uncertainty in the clinical examination of these disorders in a medico-legal context. In addition to the rigorous completion of expertise missions, we aim to reduce two damaging consequences characterizing FND: diagnostic delay and the patients\' suffering through stigma.

In recent years, some neurologists reconsidered their approach to Medically Unexplained Symptoms and proposed Functional Neurologic Disorders (FND) as a new entity, claiming that neurology could offer alternative treatment options to the psychotherapies provided in psychiatry settings. FNDs, for this purpose, should include only the disorders listed as Conversion from the Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders (SSRD) group. The present review analyzes the rationale of this position and challenges the arguments provided for its support. The review also discusses the systematization of these disorders as provided by public health systems. It outlines risks stemming from economic support and public funding uncertainty, given their negligible epidemiological dimensions resulting from the parcellation of SSRD. The review underlines the unresolved issue of Factitious Disorders, which are in the same SSRD category of the international classification but are, nonetheless, overlooked by the theoretical proponents of the FND entity. Comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders is also analyzed. We propose a model that supports the continuum between different SSRD conditions, including Factitious Disorders. The model is based on the emergence of feigned death reflex and deception from frontal lobe dysfunction. Finally, the paper summarizes the wealth of historical psychiatric and psychodynamic approaches and critical reviews. The study also puts in context the categorization and interpretation efforts provided by the most eminent researchers of the past century.

Factitious hypoglycemia is a factitious disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), referring to intentionally covertly induced hypoglycemia, with potentially severe consequences. Knowledge of factitious hypoglycemia relies on case reports, and evidence-based information and guidelines are lacking. Diagnosing factitious hypoglycemia in insulin-treated diabetic persons is therefore challenging and often requires a long and costly process. Moreover, the typical metrics proposed to differentiate insulin-induced factitious hypoglycemia from insulinoma (i.e., high insulin and low C-peptide versus high insulin and high C-peptide, respectively) are not always applicable, depending on whether the insulin quantification method can detect the insulin analog. When factitious hypoglycemia is suspected, an emerging trend from recent publications advocates a combination of two insulin quantification methods with different cross-reactivity for insulin analogs, early on in the diagnostic process.