FIGO

FIGO
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行以各种方式严重影响了世界。COVID-19是一场重大的健康危机,具有长期的身心健康后果。许多妇女报告在大流行期间和之后月经不调。该研究旨在评估COVID-19对Jazan地区育龄女性月经周期的影响。
    方法:采用描述性横断面研究设计在Jazan进行研究,沙特阿拉伯。使用结构化问卷收集346名18-44岁女性的数据,这些女性在疫情爆发前一年以上月经周期正常,有COVID-19感染史。
    结果:问卷调查由346名妇女完成。只有144(41.6%)的受访者年龄在25-34岁之间。在受访者中,283名(81.8%)是大学生,219人(63.3%)已婚。大多数女性(337人,97.4%)接种了COVID-19疫苗。共有301人(87.0%)健康。在感染COVID-19之前,19.70%的应答者有不规则的月经,感染期间增加到59.50%,好转后增加到33.20%。COVID-19感染期间的月经周期规律与COVID-19感染后的月经周期持续时间之间存在相关性(p=0.035);月经前的频率(p=0.001),在(p=0.009)期间,COVID-19感染前(p=0.001)和后(p=0.001);COVID-19感染前(p=0.001)和后(p=0.001)的月经期规律;COVID-19感染期间(p=0.001)和后(p=0.004)的疼痛严重程度。关于COVID-19对月经变化的影响的看法,COVID-19感染与连续两个月经周期的天数变化之间存在关联(p=0.001),月经周期持续时间的变化(p=0.022),月经延迟或无(p=0.019),和月经停止(p=0.023)。
    结论:研究表明,COVID-19大流行是影响妇女的国际健康问题,导致规律性的变化,持续时间,频率,疼痛的严重程度。这些变化可能会对女性的生殖健康产生长期影响。
    BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has gravely affected the world in various ways. COVID-19 is a major health crisis, with long-term physical and mental health consequences. Many women reported menstrual irregularities during and after the pandemic. The study aimed to assess the effects of COVID-19 on menstrual cycles in females of reproductive age in the Jazan region.
    METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional research design was utilized to conduct the study in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 346 women aged 18-44 years who had normal menstrual cycles for more than a year before the outbreak and had a history of COVID-19 infection.
    RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 346 women. Only 144 (41.6%) of the study\'s respondents were aged 25-34 years. Of the respondents, 283 (81.8%) were university students, and 219 (63.3%) were married. The majority of women (337, 97.4%) were vaccinated against COVID-19. A total of 301 (87.0%) were healthy. Before being infected with COVID-19, 19.70% of the responders had irregular periods, which increased to 59.50% during infection and 33.20% after getting better. There was a relationship between the regularity of menstrual periods during COVID-19 infection and the duration of menstrual periods after COVID-19 (p = 0.035); the frequency of menstrual periods before (p = 0.001), during (p = 0.009), and after (p = 0.001) COVID-19; menstrual period regularity before (p = 0.001) and after (p = 0.001) COVID-19 infection; and pain severity level during (p = 0.001) and after (p = 0.004) COVID-19 infection. Regarding the perception of the impact of COVID-19 on menstrual changes, there was an association between COVID-19 infection and variation in days during two consecutive menstrual cycles (p = 0.001), changes in the duration of menstrual cycles (p = 0.022), delayed or absent menstruation (p = 0.019), and menstruation stopping (p = 0.023).
    CONCLUSIONS: The research demonstrated the COVID-19 pandemic is an international health problem that affects women, leading to changes in regularity, duration, frequency, and severity of pain. These changes may have a long-term impact on women\'s reproductive health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:2018年国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)对宫颈癌分期的更新消除了水平肿瘤程度(HZTE)作为IA期(微观)疾病的分期参数。我们旨在确定HZTE是否与早期ECA的结果相关,FIGO应将HZTE恢复为期货更新的暂存参数。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了来自17个机构和使用FIGO2018重新分配阶段的416个FIGO2009I阶段ECA。HZTE之间的相关性,采用单变量和多变量分析对总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)进行分析.
    结果:重新分期416例导致126例(30.3%)IA和290例(69.7%)IB;85例(67.5%)IA肿瘤HZTE≤7mm,41例(32.5%)>7mm;32例(11%)IB肿瘤HZTE≤7mm,而258(89%)>7毫米(p=0.0001)。4例(3.2%)IA(1IA1,3IA2)患者复发(3≤7mm,1>7mm)与41(14.1%)IB患者(p=0.002)相比。14例IB和无IA患者死于疾病(8IB1,1≤7mm)。Cox单变量分析表明,只有RFS受到HZTE的显着影响(p=0.01),在多变量分析中,OS和RFS不受HZTE的影响。
    结论:HZTE在早期ECA中的预后价值有限,仅与RFS相关,而与多变量分析无关。根据2018年FIGO分期,HZTE并未改善I期ECA患者的预后。因此,从FIGO分期中删除此变量的理由对于ECAs是合理的。
    OBJECTIVE: The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) update on cervical cancer staging eliminated horizontal tumor extent (HZTE) as a staging parameter in stage IA (microscopic) disease. We aimed to determine whether HZTE correlates with outcomes in early stage ECAs and FIGO should reinstate HZTE as a staging parameter in futures updates.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 416 FIGO 2009 stage I ECAs from 17 institutions and re-assigned stage using FIGO 2018. Correlation between HZTE, overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) was performed using univariable and multivariable analyses.
    RESULTS: Re-staging 416 cases resulted in 126 (30.3%) IA and 290 (69.7%) IB cases; 85 (67.5%) IA tumors had HZTE ≤ 7 mm, while 41 (32.5%) were > 7 mm; 32 (11%) IB tumors had HZTE ≤ 7 mm, while 258 (89%) were > 7 mm (p = 0.0001). Four (3.2%) IA (1 IA1, 3 IA2) patients developed recurrence (3 ≤ 7 mm, 1 > 7 mm) compared to 41 (14.1%) IB patients (p = 0.002). Fourteen IB and no IA patients died of disease (8 IB1, 1 ≤ 7 mm). Cox univariate analysis demonstrated that only RFS is significantly influenced by HZTE (p = 0.01), while OS and RFS were not influenced by HZTE on multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: HZTE has limited prognostic value in early stage ECAs and is only associated with RFS on univariate but not multivariate analysis. HZTE does not improve prognostication of patients with stage I ECAs as per 2018 FIGO staging. Consequently, the rationale to remove this variable from FIGO staging is justified for ECAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    探讨接受明确放化疗的原发性宫颈癌患者的临床检查和MRI之间的局部肿瘤分期差异以及FIGO2009,FIGO2018和TNM之间的差异。
    前瞻性观察多中心研究“EMBRACE”的患者被考虑进行分析。所有患者治疗前均进行妇科检查及盆腔MRI检查。通过MRI评估结节状态,CT,PET-CT或淋巴结清扫术。对于这个分析,根据FIGO2009,FIGO2018和TNM分期系统对患者进行再分组.局部肿瘤分期分别进行MRI和临床检查。描述性统计用于比较局部肿瘤分期和不同分期系统。
    数据来自1338名患者。对于局部肿瘤分期,364例(27.2%)患者的MRI和临床检查存在差异.在52%中检测到受影响的淋巴结。FIGO2009最常见的两个阶段是IIB(54%)和IIIB(16%),在该队列中,FIGO2018IIIC1(43%)和IIB(27%)以及TNMT2bN0M0(27%)和T2bN1M0(23%)。
    MRI和临床检查导致大约四分之一患者的局部肿瘤分期不同。全面了解临床检查和MRI的差异价值对于定义一个最终的局部阶段是必要的。尤其是在决定治疗方案时。使用FIGO2009,FIGO2018和TNM分期系统会导致分期分布差异,从而使治疗结果的可比性变得复杂。TNM提供了最具差异化的阶段分配。
    To investigate differences in local tumour staging between clinical examination and MRI and differences between FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM in patients with primary cervical cancer undergoing definitive radio-chemotherapy.
    Patients from the prospective observational multi-centre study \"EMBRACE\" were considered for analysis. All patients had gynaecological examination and pelvic MRI before treatment. Nodal status was assessed by MRI, CT, PET-CT or lymphadenectomy. For this analysis, patients were restaged according to the FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM staging system. The local tumour stage was evaluated for MRI and clinical examination separately. Descriptive statistics were used to compare local tumour stages and different staging systems.
    Data was available from 1338 patients. For local tumour staging, differences between MRI and clinical examination were found in 364 patients (27.2%). Affected lymph nodes were detected in 52%. The two most frequent stages with FIGO 2009 are IIB (54%) and IIIB (16%), with FIGO 2018 IIIC1 (43%) and IIB (27%) and with TNM T2b N0 M0 (27%) and T2b N1 M0 (23%) in this cohort.
    MRI and clinical examination resulted in a different local tumour staging in approximately one quarter of patients. Comprehensive knowledge of the differential value of clinical examination and MRI is necessary to define one final local stage, especially when a decision about treatment options is to be taken. The use of FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM staging system leads to differences in stage distributions complicating comparability of treatment results. TNM provides the most differentiated stage allocation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:国际妇产科联合会(FIGO),与斯里兰卡妇产科学院(SLCOG)合作,2014年发起了一项倡议,将产后即时宫内节育器(PPIUD)服务制度化,作为斯里兰卡产前咨询和分娩室服务的常规部分。在这项研究中,我们通过一项整群随机阶梯式楔形试验评估了6家医院的FIGO-SLCOGPPIUD干预效果.
    方法:将六家医院随机分为两组,每组3家。在3个月的基线期之后,对第一组进行干预,而第二组在基线数据收集9个月后接受干预.我们收集了2015年9月至2017年1月在这些医院分娩的39,084名女性的数据。我们进行了意向治疗(ITT)分析,以确定干预对PPIUD咨询和PPIUD选择的影响,根据接受PPIUD的同意,以及PPIUD摄取(递送后插入)。我们还调查了与咨询相关的因素,比如咨询时间和质量,与PPIUD的选择有关。
    结果:我们发现干预措施提高了咨询率,从干预前所有医院的平均咨询率为12%,到干预后所有医院的平均咨询率为51%(0.307;95%CI0.148-0.465).相比之下,我们发现干预措施对PPIUD选择的影响不那么稳健和混合,4.1%的女性在干预前选择PPIUD,而9.8%的女性在干预后选择PPIUD(0.027;95%CI0.000-0.054)。
    结论:本研究表明,将PPIUD服务纳入产后护理是可行且潜在有效的。同时考虑咨询和选择PPIUD的证据,我们发现,干预措施对接受PPIUD咨询有普遍的积极影响,在较小程度上,关于PPIUD的选择。然而,很明显,干预的效果可以提高,能够满足妇女产后计划生育的需求。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02718222。2016年3月11日注册(追溯注册)。
    BACKGROUND: The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), in collaboration with the Sri Lankan College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists (SLCOG), launched an initiative in 2014 to institutionalize immediate postpartum IUD (PPIUD) services as a routine part of antenatal counseling and delivery room services in Sri Lanka. In this study, we evaluate the effect of the FIGO-SLCOG PPIUD intervention in six hospitals by means of a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial.
    METHODS: Six hospitals were randomized into two groups of three using matched pairs. Following a 3-month baseline period, the intervention was administered to the first group, while the second group received the intervention after 9 months of baseline data collection. We collected data from 39,084 women who delivered in these hospitals between September 2015 and January 2017. We conduct an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis to determine the impact of the intervention on PPIUD counseling and choice of PPIUD, as measured by consent to receive a PPIUD, as well as PPIUD uptake (insertion following delivery). We also investigate how factors related to counseling, such as counseling timing and quality, are linked to choice of PPIUD.
    RESULTS: We find that the intervention increased rates of counseling, from an average counseling rate of 12% in all hospitals prior to the intervention to an average rate of 51% in all hospitals after the rollout of the intervention (0.307; 95% CI 0.148-0.465). In contrast, we find the impact of the intervention on choice of PPIUD to be less robust and mixed, with 4.1% of women choosing PPIUD prior to the intervention compared to 9.8% of women choosing PPIUD after the rollout of the intervention (0.027; 95% CI 0.000-0.054).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that incorporating PPIUD services into postpartum care is feasible and potentially effective. Taking the evidence on both counseling and choice of PPIUD together, we find that the intervention had a generally positive impact on receipt of PPIUD counseling and, to a lesser degree, on choice of the PPIUD. Nevertheless, it is clear that the intervention\'s effectiveness can be improved to be able to meet the demand for postpartum family planning of women.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02718222 . Registered on 11 March 2016 (retrospectively registered).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    妊娠期糖尿病,最常见的妊娠并发症,影响了美国5-6%的女性,使用目前主要的Carpenter-Coustan标准,这仍然代表了美国妇产科学院的首选方法。国际妊娠糖尿病协会研究组提出的替代标准可能会将妊娠糖尿病患病率提高到15-20%。由于1步测试策略和仅要求1个升高的血糖值用于诊断。妊娠期糖尿病患病率的增加与母亲年龄的增加以及超重和肥胖的患病率增加有关。在20-44岁的美国成年人中,妊娠糖尿病患病率增加与29.3%的前驱糖尿病患病率和4.5%的妊娠外已知糖尿病患病率一致。根据国际妊娠糖尿病协会研究组标准,妊娠糖尿病与胎龄大婴儿的风险几乎是其两倍。胎儿肥胖增加,新生儿高胰岛素血症和先兆子痫,早产和肩难产的风险增加50%。最近发表的《高血糖和不良妊娠结局随访研究》提供了有关妊娠期糖尿病对长期母婴健康影响的进一步证据。这项研究清楚地表明,怀孕期间的高血糖,未经治疗,并根据国际妊娠糖尿病协会研究组标准进行事后鉴定,孕妇患糖尿病前期的风险为41.5%(比值比,3.72;95%置信区间,3.09-4.47)和10.7%的2型糖尿病风险(比值比,7.63;95%置信区间,5.33-10.95)随访11.4年。妊娠期糖尿病也与儿童超重和肥胖率较高相关(孕妇妊娠期糖尿病患病率39.3%;比值比,1.5;95%置信区间,1.56-2.44)。本文将这些发现置于其他最新研究的背景下,这些研究表明,包括生活方式措施和/或二甲双胍在内的干预措施可使妊娠糖尿病妇女在妊娠糖尿病指数妊娠后发生明显糖尿病的风险降低>50%。尽管迄今为止尚未证明通过妊娠糖尿病的妊娠治疗来预防后代的肥胖和前驱糖尿病,我们认为,立即怀孕的好处和长期改善孕产妇健康的机会证明了重新评估美国妇产科医师学会对妊娠期糖尿病诊断的当前矛盾方法的合理性。目前允许选择替代标准。Carpenter-Coustan或国家糖尿病数据组标准,被美国妇产科学院列为首选标准,与国际妊娠糖尿病协会研究组的标准相比,妊娠期糖尿病的发生频率明显受到限制,并限制了即时和长期随访和治疗的机会.我们认为,高血糖和妊娠结局随访研究以及其他有关长期母婴风险的最新出版物的新信息为更全面的方法在整个生命周期中促进母婴健康提供了令人信服的论据。
    Gestational diabetes mellitus, the most frequent medical complication of pregnancy, affects 5-6% of women in the United States with the use of the currently predominant Carpenter-Coustan criteria, which still represent the preferred approach of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Alternative criteria proposed by the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups would likely increase gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence to 15-20%, because of both a 1-step testing policy and the requirement for only 1 elevated glucose value for diagnosis. Increasing gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence relates to older maternal age and the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity. This increased gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence is consistent with 29.3% prevalence of prediabetes and 4.5% prevalence of known diabetes outside pregnancy in US adults from 20-44 years of age. Gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups criteria is associated with almost twice the risk of large-for-gestational-age babies, increased fetal adiposity, neonatal hyperinsulinemia and preeclampsia, and a 50% higher risk of preterm delivery and shoulder dystocia. The recent publication of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow Up Study provides further evidence regarding the influence of gestational diabetes mellitus on long-term maternal and infant health. This study clearly demonstrates that hyperglycemia in pregnancy, untreated and identified post hoc by the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups criteria, carries a 41.5% risk of maternal prediabetes (odds ratio, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 3.09-4.47) and 10.7% risk of type 2 diabetes (odds ratio, 7.63; 95% confidence interval, 5.33-10.95) after 11.4 years of follow up. Gestational diabetes mellitus was also associated with higher rates of childhood overweight and obesity (prevalence 39.3% with maternal gestational diabetes mellitus; odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-2.44). This article places these findings in the context of other recent studies that have demonstrated that interventions that include lifestyle measures and/or metformin offer a >50% reduction in the risk of women with gestational diabetes mellitus experiencing the development of overt diabetes mellitus after their index gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancy. Although prevention of obesity and prediabetes in offspring by pregnancy treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus has not been demonstrated to date, we argue that the immediate pregnancy benefits and opportunities for long-term improvements in maternal health justify a reevaluation of the current ambivalent approach taken by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis, which currently allow for a choice of alternative criteria. The Carpenter-Coustan or National Diabetes Data Group criteria, listed as preferred criteria by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, markedly limit the frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus in comparison with the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups criteria and limit the opportunity for immediate and long-term follow up and treatment. We consider that new information from the Hyperglycemia and Pregnancy Outcome Follow Up Study and other recent publications on long-term maternal and offspring risk provides compelling arguments for a more comprehensive approach to the promotion of maternal and infant health through all the life cycle.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To report experience with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) in a developing country like Pakistan with limited resources and weak database of health system.
    METHODS: Patients with BOTs managed at Shaukat Khanum Cancer hospital, Lahore, Pakistan from 2004 to 2014 were included and reviewed retrospectively. Data was recorded on histopathological types, age, CA-125, stage of disease, treatment modalities and outcomes.
    RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with BOT were included with a median age of 35 years. Forty-two (49%) patients had serous BOTs and 43 (50%) had mucinous BOTs, while one (1%) had mixed type. Using FIGO staging, 80 patients had stage I; two patients had IIA, IIB and stage III each. Median follow-up time was 31.5 months. All patients had primary surgery. Seventy (81%) patients underwent complete surgical resection of tumor. Forty-three (50%) patients had fertility preserving surgery. Seventy-three (85%) patients remained in remission. Recurrent disease was observed in 13 (15%) patients. Median time to recurrence was 22 months. On further analysis, age above forty years, late stage at diagnosis and incomplete surgery were significantly associated with invasive recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite a low malignant potential, relapses may occur in patients above forty years of age, incomplete surgery and staging information and advanced stage at presentation. Fertility sparing surgery should be considered in young patients. Complete excision of tumor and prolonged follow-up are advised because recurrence and transformation to invasive carcinoma may occur.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号