Expanded criteria donors

扩大捐助者标准
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据目前对一般人群的预测和终末期肾病随年龄的增加,老年捐赠者和接受者的数量正在增加,提出了关于如何最大程度地减少老年供体器官的丢弃率并改善移植物和患者预后的关键问题。2002年,扩大标准的捐助者是水晶城会议的重点(VA,美国),目的是最大限度地利用已故捐献者的器官。从那以后,扩大标准的捐赠者逐渐为全世界大量移植移植物做出了贡献,为分配制度提出具体问题,收件人管理,和治疗方法。这篇综述分析了我们在过去20年中对扩大捐助者利用标准的了解,免疫抑制管理方面有前途的创新,以及衰老过程中涉及的分子途径,这构成了新疗法的潜在目标。
    Based on the current projection of the general population and the combined increase in end-stage kidney disease with age, the number of elderly donors and recipients is increasing, raising crucial questions about how to minimize the discard rate of organs from elderly donors and improve graft and patient outcomes. In 2002, extended criteria donors were the focus of a meeting in Crystal City (VA, USA), with a goal of maximizing the use of organs from deceased donors. Since then, extended criteria donors have progressively contributed to a large number of transplanted grafts worldwide, posing specific issues for allocation systems, recipient management, and therapeutic approaches. This review analyzes what we have learned in the last 20 years about extended criteria donor utilization, the promising innovations in immunosuppressive management, and the molecular pathways involved in the aging process, which constitute potential targets for novel therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ESOTTLJ3.0。共识会议汇集了移植方面的领先专家,就移植前肾活检在评估扩大标准供体(ECD)移植物方面的标准化和临床实用性制定循证指导.选择了七个主题,并在制定PICO后进行了深入分析(患者/人群,干预,比较,结果)问题。经过文献检索,产生了每个关键问题的陈述,根据等级方法[证据质量:高(A),中度(B),低(C);推荐强度:强(1),弱(2)]。声明随后在布拉格启动会议上亲自介绍,讨论和投票。经过两轮讨论和表决,所有7项声明在以下问题上达成了100%的总体共识:代表性的针芯/楔形/打孔技术[B,1],冷冻/石蜡包埋切片可靠性[B,2],有经验/无经验的随叫随到的肾脏病理学家的组织学报告的可重复性/准确性[A,1],肾小球硬化/其他参数可重复性[C,2],数字病理学/光学显微镜在组织学变量测量中的应用[A,1],特殊染色/苏木精和伊红单独比较[A,1],肾小球硬化可靠性与其他组织学参数,以预测移植物存活,移植物功能,主要的非功能[B,1].这种方法使欧洲专家在ECD移植物评估中关于植入前活检的重要技术主题上达成了完全共识。
    The ESOT TLJ 3.0. consensus conference brought together leading experts in transplantation to develop evidence-based guidance on the standardization and clinical utility of pre-implantation kidney biopsy in the assessment of grafts from Expanded Criteria Donors (ECD). Seven themes were selected and underwent in-depth analysis after formulation of PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) questions. After literature search, the statements for each key question were produced, rated according the GRADE approach [Quality of evidence: High (A), Moderate (B), Low (C); Strength of Recommendation: Strong (1), Weak (2)]. The statements were subsequently presented in-person at the Prague kick-off meeting, discussed and voted. After two rounds of discussion and voting, all 7 statements reached an overall agreement of 100% on the following issues: needle core/wedge/punch technique representatively [B,1], frozen/paraffin embedded section reliability [B,2], experienced/non-experienced on-call renal pathologist reproducibility/accuracy of the histological report [A,1], glomerulosclerosis/other parameters reproducibility [C,2], digital pathology/light microscopy in the measurement of histological variables [A,1], special stainings/Haematoxylin and Eosin alone comparison [A,1], glomerulosclerosis reliability versus other histological parameters to predict the graft survival, graft function, primary non-function [B,1]. This methodology has allowed to reach a full consensus among European experts on important technical topics regarding pre-implantation biopsy in the ECD graft assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号