背景:需要研究信仰和祈祷应用程序如何适应种族和少数民族(REM)群体的价值观,以及这些应用程序是否有效促进心理健康和福祉。
目的:本研究旨在确定使用移动应用程序Pray.com对REM参与者的心理健康和福祉的可行性和初步有效性。
方法:本研究为单组(N=77),在REM组中进行为期4周的可行性试验(65/77,84%黑人或非裔美国人)。参与者被要求免费使用Pray.com应用程序,每周至少5次,每天5分钟。参与者在基线和干预后时间点完成问卷。可行性问卷仅在干预后时间点完成,包括定性访谈(n=15)。可行性问题包括可接受性(即,满意,打算继续使用,感知的适当性,并适应文化),需求(即,自我报告的应用程序使用情况,表达了兴趣,和感知需求),和实用性(即,易用性或使用难度,使用应用程序的能力,和成本效益)。频率和描述性统计用于分析可行性结果。使用配对样本2尾t检验分析因变量的变化。进行了部分相关研究,以探索应用程序使用和结果之间的关联,控制基线分数。
结果:参与者报告(54/72,75%的人对可行性问题回答“非常可能”或“可能”),他们认为Pray.com应用程序是可以接受的。这些发现得到了定性访谈的支持(n=15)。大多数参与者(62/72,86%)不符合应用程序使用处方,但表示有兴趣在未来使用该应用程序,并认为他们的社区对它的需求。此外,参与者报告称,该应用易于使用,并且认为其价格低廉(7.99美元).参与者报告心理健康有所改善(即,压力、抑郁和焦虑症状)和幸福感(即,对生活的满意度,精神上的幸福,宗教承诺,和种族或族裔身份发展)尽管干预后的平均水平相对较低,应用程序使用的变异性也很高(在研究过程中,平均总计45.83,SD111.90分钟)。更多的应用程序使用与心理健康和精神福祉的改善显着相关。然而,应用程序使用和研究方法的局限性表明,研究结果可能无法准确地捕捉到Pray.com使用的全部影响。
结论:这是第一项评估信仰和祈祷应用程序在REM个体样本中对心理健康和福祉的可行性的研究。我们的研究结果表明,使用信仰和祈祷应用程序(即,Pray.com)对于改善REM个人及其社区的心理健康症状和幸福感可能是可行的,并且具有重大影响,尤其是有基督教背景的黑人和非裔美国人。需要进一步的研究。
BACKGROUND: Research is needed on how faith and prayer apps fit within the values of racial and
ethnic minority (REM) groups, as well as whether such apps are effective in promoting mental health and well-being.
OBJECTIVE: This
study aims to determine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of using the mobile app Pray.com on mental health and well-being among REM participants.
METHODS: This
study was a single-group (N=77), 4-week feasibility
trial in REM groups (65/77, 84% Black or African American). Participants were asked to use the Pray.com app at no cost for at least 5 times per week for 5 minutes per day. Participants completed questionnaires at the baseline and postintervention time points. Feasibility questionnaires were only completed at the postintervention time point, including qualitative interviews (n=15). The feasibility questions included acceptability (ie, satisfaction, intent to continue use, perceived appropriateness, and fit within culture), demand (ie, self-reported app use, expressed interest, and perceived demand), and practicality (ie, ease or difficulty of use, ability to use the app, and cost-effectiveness). Frequency and descriptive statistics were used to analyze feasibility outcomes. Changes in dependent variables were analyzed using paired-sample 2-tailed t tests. Partial correlations were conducted to explore the association between app use and outcomes, controlling for baseline scores.
RESULTS: Participants reported (54/72, 75% responded with \"very likely\" or \"likely\" to the feasibility questions) that they perceived the Pray.com app as acceptable. These findings were supported by qualitative interviews (n=15). Most participants (62/72, 86%) did not meet the app use prescription but expressed interest in using the app in the future and perceived demand for it in their communities. In addition, participants reported that the app was easy to use and perceived it to be inexpensive (US $7.99). Participants reported improved mental health (ie, stress and depressive and anxiety symptoms) and well-being (ie, satisfaction with life, spiritual well-being, religious commitment, and racial or
ethnic identity development) at postintervention despite relatively low average levels and high variability of app use (average total of 45.83, SD 111.90 min over the course of the study). Greater app use was significantly associated with improvements in mental health and spiritual well-being. However, app use and
study methodology limitations suggest that the
study results may not accurately capture the full impact of Pray.com use.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the feasibility of a faith and prayer app for mental health and well-being in a sample of REM individuals. Our findings suggest that the use of a faith and prayer app (ie, Pray.com) could be feasible and significantly impactful for the improvement of mental health symptoms and well-being in REM individuals and their communities, especially Black and African American individuals with a Christian affiliation. Further research is warranted.