Ethnic

民族
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:妊娠相关死亡在美国呈上升趋势,黑人患者的预后存在显着差异。大多数解决妊娠相关死亡的解决方案都是基于医院的,这依赖于患者识别症状并寻求卫生系统的护理,许多黑人患者报告经历过偏见的地区。需要以患者为中心的解决方案,以支持和鼓励产后患者寻求严重症状的护理。
    目的:我们旨在确定移动健康(mHealth)患者报告结果和决策支持系统的设计需求,以帮助Black患者评估何时寻求严重产后症状的医疗护理。这些发现也可能支持其他临床环境中不同的围产期人群和小型人群。
    方法:我们对36名参与者-15名(42%)产科健康专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,10名(28%)精神卫生专业人员,11名(31%)产后黑人患者。访谈问题包括:目前的症状监测做法,有效监测的障碍和促进者,以及支持监测严重症状的mHealth系统的设计要求。访谈是录音和转录的。我们使用定向内容分析和恒定的比较过程分析了转录本。我们采用了主题分析方法,使用健康行为和人类信息处理的概念框架演绎主题,同时也允许新的主题从数据中产生。我们的团队让多个程序员通过共识过程来提高可靠性。
    结果:我们的研究结果揭示了与产后支持相关症状输入相关的考虑因素,可能影响症状处理的驱动程序,以及症状自我监测和患者决策支持干预的设计需求。首先,参与者认为躯体和心理症状输入对捕获都很重要。第二,自我感知;以前的经验;社会文化,金融,环境,和卫生系统层面的因素都被认为会影响患者的处理方式,做出决定,并根据他们的症状采取行动。第三,参与者为允许用户控制和自由的系统设计提供了建议。他们还强调了谨慎措辞决策支持信息的重要性,这样,建议他们寻求护理的信息传达了紧迫性,但不会引起焦虑。或者,建议他们可能不需要护理的信息应使患者感到听到和放心。
    结论:产后症状监测的未来解决方案应包括躯体和心理症状,这可能需要结合现有的措施,以微妙的方式引发症状。解决方案应该允许多种多样,安全互动,以满足个人需求。虽然mHealth或其他应用程序可能无法满足个人的所有社会或财务需求,他们至少可以提供信息,以便患者可以轻松获得其他支持资源。
    BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related death is on the rise in the United States, and there are significant disparities in outcomes for Black patients. Most solutions that address pregnancy-related death are hospital based, which rely on patients recognizing symptoms and seeking care from a health system, an area where many Black patients have reported experiencing bias. There is a need for patient-centered solutions that support and encourage postpartum people to seek care for severe symptoms.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the design needs for a mobile health (mHealth) patient-reported outcomes and decision-support system to assist Black patients in assessing when to seek medical care for severe postpartum symptoms. These findings may also support different perinatal populations and minoritized groups in other clinical settings.
    METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 36 participants-15 (42%) obstetric health professionals, 10 (28%) mental health professionals, and 11 (31%) postpartum Black patients. The interview questions included the following: current practices for symptom monitoring, barriers to and facilitators of effective monitoring, and design requirements for an mHealth system that supports monitoring for severe symptoms. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. We analyzed transcripts using directed content analysis and the constant comparative process. We adopted a thematic analysis approach, eliciting themes deductively using conceptual frameworks from health behavior and human information processing, while also allowing new themes to inductively arise from the data. Our team involved multiple coders to promote reliability through a consensus process.
    RESULTS: Our findings revealed considerations related to relevant symptom inputs for postpartum support, the drivers that may affect symptom processing, and the design needs for symptom self-monitoring and patient decision-support interventions. First, participants viewed both somatic and psychological symptom inputs as important to capture. Second, self-perception; previous experience; sociocultural, financial, environmental, and health systems-level factors were all perceived to impact how patients processed, made decisions about, and acted upon their symptoms. Third, participants provided recommendations for system design that involved allowing for user control and freedom. They also stressed the importance of careful wording of decision-support messages, such that messages that recommend them to seek care convey urgency but do not provoke anxiety. Alternatively, messages that recommend they may not need care should make the patient feel heard and reassured.
    CONCLUSIONS: Future solutions for postpartum symptom monitoring should include both somatic and psychological symptoms, which may require combining existing measures to elicit symptoms in a nuanced manner. Solutions should allow for varied, safe interactions to suit individual needs. While mHealth or other apps may not be able to address all the social or financial needs of a person, they may at least provide information, so that patients can easily access other supportive resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要研究信仰和祈祷应用程序如何适应种族和少数民族(REM)群体的价值观,以及这些应用程序是否有效促进心理健康和福祉。
    目的:本研究旨在确定使用移动应用程序Pray.com对REM参与者的心理健康和福祉的可行性和初步有效性。
    方法:本研究为单组(N=77),在REM组中进行为期4周的可行性试验(65/77,84%黑人或非裔美国人)。参与者被要求免费使用Pray.com应用程序,每周至少5次,每天5分钟。参与者在基线和干预后时间点完成问卷。可行性问卷仅在干预后时间点完成,包括定性访谈(n=15)。可行性问题包括可接受性(即,满意,打算继续使用,感知的适当性,并适应文化),需求(即,自我报告的应用程序使用情况,表达了兴趣,和感知需求),和实用性(即,易用性或使用难度,使用应用程序的能力,和成本效益)。频率和描述性统计用于分析可行性结果。使用配对样本2尾t检验分析因变量的变化。进行了部分相关研究,以探索应用程序使用和结果之间的关联,控制基线分数。
    结果:参与者报告(54/72,75%的人对可行性问题回答“非常可能”或“可能”),他们认为Pray.com应用程序是可以接受的。这些发现得到了定性访谈的支持(n=15)。大多数参与者(62/72,86%)不符合应用程序使用处方,但表示有兴趣在未来使用该应用程序,并认为他们的社区对它的需求。此外,参与者报告称,该应用易于使用,并且认为其价格低廉(7.99美元).参与者报告心理健康有所改善(即,压力、抑郁和焦虑症状)和幸福感(即,对生活的满意度,精神上的幸福,宗教承诺,和种族或族裔身份发展)尽管干预后的平均水平相对较低,应用程序使用的变异性也很高(在研究过程中,平均总计45.83,SD111.90分钟)。更多的应用程序使用与心理健康和精神福祉的改善显着相关。然而,应用程序使用和研究方法的局限性表明,研究结果可能无法准确地捕捉到Pray.com使用的全部影响。
    结论:这是第一项评估信仰和祈祷应用程序在REM个体样本中对心理健康和福祉的可行性的研究。我们的研究结果表明,使用信仰和祈祷应用程序(即,Pray.com)对于改善REM个人及其社区的心理健康症状和幸福感可能是可行的,并且具有重大影响,尤其是有基督教背景的黑人和非裔美国人。需要进一步的研究。
    BACKGROUND: Research is needed on how faith and prayer apps fit within the values of racial and ethnic minority (REM) groups, as well as whether such apps are effective in promoting mental health and well-being.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of using the mobile app Pray.com on mental health and well-being among REM participants.
    METHODS: This study was a single-group (N=77), 4-week feasibility trial in REM groups (65/77, 84% Black or African American). Participants were asked to use the Pray.com app at no cost for at least 5 times per week for 5 minutes per day. Participants completed questionnaires at the baseline and postintervention time points. Feasibility questionnaires were only completed at the postintervention time point, including qualitative interviews (n=15). The feasibility questions included acceptability (ie, satisfaction, intent to continue use, perceived appropriateness, and fit within culture), demand (ie, self-reported app use, expressed interest, and perceived demand), and practicality (ie, ease or difficulty of use, ability to use the app, and cost-effectiveness). Frequency and descriptive statistics were used to analyze feasibility outcomes. Changes in dependent variables were analyzed using paired-sample 2-tailed t tests. Partial correlations were conducted to explore the association between app use and outcomes, controlling for baseline scores.
    RESULTS: Participants reported (54/72, 75% responded with \"very likely\" or \"likely\" to the feasibility questions) that they perceived the Pray.com app as acceptable. These findings were supported by qualitative interviews (n=15). Most participants (62/72, 86%) did not meet the app use prescription but expressed interest in using the app in the future and perceived demand for it in their communities. In addition, participants reported that the app was easy to use and perceived it to be inexpensive (US $7.99). Participants reported improved mental health (ie, stress and depressive and anxiety symptoms) and well-being (ie, satisfaction with life, spiritual well-being, religious commitment, and racial or ethnic identity development) at postintervention despite relatively low average levels and high variability of app use (average total of 45.83, SD 111.90 min over the course of the study). Greater app use was significantly associated with improvements in mental health and spiritual well-being. However, app use and study methodology limitations suggest that the study results may not accurately capture the full impact of Pray.com use.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the feasibility of a faith and prayer app for mental health and well-being in a sample of REM individuals. Our findings suggest that the use of a faith and prayer app (ie, Pray.com) could be feasible and significantly impactful for the improvement of mental health symptoms and well-being in REM individuals and their communities, especially Black and African American individuals with a Christian affiliation. Further research is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该项目的目的是探索英国贫困城市地区巴基斯坦裔社区对痴呆症的理解和认识。这项研究在访问和采访Pothwari演讲者方面是独一无二的,他们中的一些人无法阅读或理解英语口语。早期研究产生的数据被用来构建五种情景,作为对来自巴基斯坦裔社区的11名男女参与者进行面对面半结构化访谈的基础,这些访谈跨越两代人。Braun和Clarke的六个主题分析阶段用于分析数据以回答研究问题。从这些访谈中构建的主题表明缺乏对痴呆症的认识和理解,一系列的态度和假设,不愿寻求外部支持,以及文化背景在塑造个人反应方面的重要作用。研究发现,缺乏理解,文化差异,语言问题给英国巴基斯坦社区获得服务带来了障碍,特别是在巴基斯坦出生和/或优先使用英语的人。Pothwari发言者可能需要提供服务和信息,以便接触到这一被忽视的人口群体。
    The aim of this project was to explore the understanding and awareness of dementia in the Pakistani-origin community in a deprived urban region of the UK. The study was unique in accessing and interviewing Pothwari speakers, some of whom could not read or understand spoken English. Data generated from an earlier study were used to construct five scenarios, which were used as the basis for face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 11 male and female participants from the Pakistani-origin community spanning two generations. Braun and Clarke\'s six phases of thematic analysis were used to analyse the data to answer the research questions. Themes constructed from these interviews indicated a lack of awareness and understanding of dementia, a range of attitudes and assumptions, reluctance to seek external support, and a significant role for the cultural background in shaping the individuals\' responses. The study found that poor understanding, cultural differences, and language issues presented barriers to accessing services in the British Pakistani community, particularly among those who had been born in Pakistan and/or spoke Pothwari in preference to English. Services and information may need to be offered by Pothwari speakers in order to reach this neglected sector of the population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)的全球患病率正在增加。T2DM与肠道微生物群的改变有关,会受到年龄的影响,疾病,和遗传学。先前的研究表明,Dai族和汉族人群之间存在着不同的微生物群组成。然而,这两个群体之间特定的肠道微生物群差异尚未阐明。
    目的:比较Dai族和汉族人群中患有和未患有T2DM的受试者的肠道菌群差异。
    方法:汉族人群共35名受试者(包括15名健康儿童,8个成人健康对照,和12名成年T2DM患者)和Dai人群的32名受试者(包括10名健康儿童,10个成人健康对照,和12名成人T2DM患者)纳入本研究。从所有受试者收集空腹静脉血样品用于生化分析。收集所有受试者的粪便样本进行DNA提取和16SrRNA测序,随后分析了肠道微生物群的组成。
    结果:在健康儿童和成人之间没有观察到α多样性的显着差异。2型糖尿病患者肠道菌群的多样性与健康成人相比在傣族和汉族人群中降低。在汉族人群中,健康儿童和健康成人之间的肠道微生物群存在显着差异,儿童中的拟杆菌丰度增加,而Firmicutes减少。然而,这种差异在Dai族中较小。与健康成年人相比,T2DM患者在汉族人群中的拟杆菌和Dai族人群中的变形杆菌显着增加,而在汉族和Dai族人群中的Firmicutes均减少。线性判别分析效应大小分析还表明,汉族和Dai族人群的肠道菌群在健康儿童中存在差异,成年人,和T2DM患者。与Dai族相比,汉族人群中四种细菌持续增加,两种持续减少。
    结论:在汉族和Dai族之间发现了肠道菌群的差异。在汉族人群中,拟杆菌显著增加与T2DM的发生有关,而Dai族中变形菌的显着增加与T2DM的发生有关。
    BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing. T2DM is associated with alterations of the gut microbiota, which can be affected by age, illness, and genetics. Previous studies revealed that there are discriminating microbiota compositions between the Dai and the Han populations. However, the specific gut microbiota differences between the two populations have not been elucidated.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the gut microbiota differences in subjects with and without T2DM in the Dai and Han populations.
    METHODS: A total of 35 subjects of the Han population (including 15 healthy children, 8 adult healthy controls, and 12 adult T2DM patients) and 32 subjects of the Dai population (including 10 healthy children, 10 adult healthy controls, and 12 adult T2DM patients) were enrolled in this study. Fasting venous blood samples were collected from all the subjects for biochemical analysis. Fecal samples were collected from all the subjects for DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing, which was followed by analyses of the gut microbiota composition.
    RESULTS: No significant difference in alpha diversity was observed between healthy children and adults. The diversity of gut microbiota was decreased in T2DM patients compared to the healthy adults in both the Dai and Han populations. There was a significant difference in gut microbiota between healthy children and healthy adults in the Han population with an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes and decreased Firmicutes in children. However, this difference was less in the Dai population. Significant increases in Bacteroidetes in the Han population and Proteobacteria in the Dai population and decreases in Firmicutes in both the Han and Dai population were observed in T2DM patients compared to healthy adults. Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size analysis also showed that the gut microbiota was different between the Han and Dai populations in heathy children, adults, and T2DM patients. Four bacteria were consistently increased and two consistently decreased in the Han population compared to the Dai population.
    CONCLUSIONS: Differences in gut microbiota were found between the Han and Dai populations. A significant increase in Bacteroidetes was related to the occurrence of T2DM in the Han population, while a significant increase in Proteobacteria was related to the occurrence of T2DM in the Dai population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    •与瑞典出生的人相比,外国出生的人不太可能接受痴呆症诊断测试。•出生在非洲或欧洲与接受胆碱酯酶抑制剂的机会较低有关。•亚洲出生的人接受胆碱酯酶抑制剂的机会更高,但接受美金刚的可能性较小。•瑞典出生的人和外国出生的人之间在痴呆症诊断和治疗方面存在差异,但调整MMSE评分后不一致.
    •Compared to Swedish-born people, foreign-born people were less likely to receive dementia diagnostic tests.•Being born in Africa or Europe was associated with lower chance of receiving cholinesterase inhibitors.•Asian-born people had higher chance of receiving cholinesterase inhibitors, but were less likely to receive memantine.•Disparities existed in dementia diagnostics and treatment between Swedish-born and foreign-born people, but were not consistent after adjusting for MMSE scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然近年来美国的母乳喂养率有所增加,种族和民族差异依然存在。通过增加与哺乳顾问的联系,远程通话可能有助于减少差距,但是关于少数族裔的可接受性的研究有限。
    目的:我们的目的是探索黑人父母之间的远程脱教经验,并确定使服务在文化上更合适的策略。
    方法:我们选择了20名黑人父母,他们从正在进行的美国国立卫生研究院资助的随机对照试验(Tele-MILC试验)中获得了远程治疗服务,参加半结构化访谈。采访涉及出生经历,关于远程解译的使用和意见,远距与亲自哺乳支持的比较,以及改善远程联络服务的建议。主题分析是由先前报道的可接受性理论框架和兰德公司的股权中心模型提供的。
    结果:用户赞赏远程解育的便利性,并报告说哺乳顾问知识渊博且乐于助人。参与者希望在视频访问之外有更多选择与哺乳顾问互动(例如,短信和异步资源)。有有色哺乳顾问的用户提到种族一致性改善了体验;然而,很少有人认为,高质量的远程通信支持需要种族和谐。
    结论:虽然我们的样本中的黑人父母发现远程治疗服务是可以接受的,远程通话不能,孤立地,解决长期母乳喂养的无数障碍。可以对远程服务进行一些更改,以增加少数族裔的使用。
    While breastfeeding rates have increased in the United States in recent years, racial and ethnic disparities persist. Telelactation may help reduce disparities by increasing access to lactation consultants, but there is limited research on acceptability among minoritized individuals.
    We aimed to explore experiences with telelactation among Black parents and identify strategies to make services more culturally appropriate.
    We selected 20 Black parents who were given access to telelactation services from an ongoing National Institutes of Health-funded randomized controlled trial (the Tele-MILC trial) to participate in semistructured interviews. Interviews addressed birth experiences, use and opinions about telelactation, comparison of telelactation to in-person lactation support, and recommendations to improve telelactation services. The thematic analysis was informed by a previously reported theoretical framework of acceptability and RAND Corporation\'s equity-centered model.
    Users appreciated the convenience of telelactation and reported that lactation consultants were knowledgeable and helpful. Participants wanted more options to engage with lactation consultants outside of video visits (eg, SMS text messaging and asynchronous resources). Users who had a lactation consultant of color mentioned that racial concordance improved the experience; however, few felt that racial concordance was needed for high-quality telelactation support.
    While Black parents in our sample found telelactation services to be acceptable, telelactation could not, in isolation, address the myriad barriers to long-duration breastfeeding. Several changes could be made to telelactation services to increase their use by minoritized populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    没有研究将手术结果中种族和民族差异导致的过高死亡率作为背景。Further,没有做出太多努力来量化消除这些差距所需的努力。
    我们研究了美国术后人群中由于种族或族裔差异导致的死亡率的当前趋势。然后,我们确定了到2030年消除这些差距所必需的降低死亡率的目标。
    我们进行了一项基于人群的研究,研究了2000年至2020年间在美国医院进行的1,512,974例成人(18-64岁)高风险外科手术。
    在2000年至2020年期间,所有组的风险调整后死亡率均下降。尽管如此,黑人患者更有可能在手术后死亡(调整后相对风险1.42;95%CI,1.39-1.46),原因是东北部黑人死亡率较高(1.60;95%CI,1.52-1.68),以及西部(1.53;95%CI,1.43-1.62)。同样,与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者的死亡风险始终较高(1.21;95%CI,1.19-1.24),受西方死亡率较高的驱动(1.26;95%CI,1.21-1.31)。总的来说,黑人患者的死亡率与白人患者的死亡率相同,需要减少8364例死亡。西班牙裔患者的类似数字为4388。为了到2030年消除黑人和白人患者之间的差距,我们需要将黑人患者的预计死亡率按年度降低2.7%。对于西班牙裔美国人来说,所需的年化降幅为0.8%。
    我们的数据为纳入人口和卫生系统措施提供了一个框架,以消除未来十年内手术死亡率的差异。
    UNASSIGNED: No study has contextualized the excess mortality attributable to racial and ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes. Further, not much effort has been made to quantify the effort needed to eliminate these disparities.
    UNASSIGNED: We examined the current trends in mortality attributable to racial or ethnic disparities in the US postsurgical population. We then identified the target for mortality reduction that would be necessary to eliminate these disparities by 2030.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a population-based study of 1,512,974 high-risk surgical procedures among adults (18-64 years) performed across US hospitals between 2000 and 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: Between 2000 and 2020, the risk-adjusted mortality rates declined for all groups. Nonetheless, Black patients were more likely to die following surgery (adjusted relative risk 1.42; 95% CI, 1.39-1.46) driven by higher Black mortality in the northeast (1.60; 95% CI, 1.52-1.68), as well as the West (1.53; 95% CI, 1.43-1.62). Similarly, mortality risk remained consistently higher for Hispanics compared with White patients (1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.24), driven by higher mortality in the West (1.26; 95% CI, 1.21-1.31). Overall, 8364 fewer deaths are required for Black patients to experience mortality on the same scale as White patients. Similar figures for Hispanic patients are 4388. To eliminate the disparity between Black and White patients by 2030, we need a 2.7% annualized reduction in the projected mortality among Black patients. For Hispanics, the annualized reduction needed is 0.8%.
    UNASSIGNED: Our data provides a framework for incorporating population and health systems measures for eliminating disparity in surgical mortality within the next decade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于种族的焦虑是黑人社区中的一个关键健康问题。正念干预措施有望治疗美国黑人基于种族的焦虑;然而,有许多障碍阻止美国黑人使用这些治疗方法,比如文化相关性低,巨大的时间负担,和过高的成本。
    目的:这项研究是对“治愈尝试”-简短(<60分钟)的发现的复制和扩展,数字,基于音乐的正念干预是美国黑人种族焦虑的可行和可接受的干预。在这项研究中,我们在那些几乎没有冥想经验的人中测试了这个研究问题。
    方法:参与者是4名黑人美国成年人,他们具有基于种族的特质焦虑和几乎没有冥想经验。我们使用了一系列多基线单病例实验,并在Zoom(ZoomVideoCommunications)上进行了研究访问,以评估干预是否可以减少黑人美国人的状态焦虑并增加正念和自我同情。我们还使用定量和定性量表评估了可行性和可接受性。
    结果:与我们的假设一致,“治疗尝试”增加了正念/自我同情(Tau-U范围:0.57-0.86;P<.001),并减少了状态焦虑(Tau-U范围:-0.93至-0.66;P<.001),具有很高的可行性和可接受性(推荐“治愈尝试”的平均可能性为100分中的88分)。
    结论:“治愈尝试”可能代表了对美国黑人种族焦虑的可行干预,种族焦虑加剧,很少或没有正念经验。未来的受试者间随机可行性试验可以评估干预是否可以引起种族焦虑的持久改善,正念,和自我同情。
    背景:OSF注册中心osf.io/k5m93;https://osf.io/k5m93。
    BACKGROUND: Race-based anxiety is a critical health issue within the Black community. Mindfulness interventions hold promise for treating race-based anxiety in Black Americans; however, there are many barriers that prevent Black Americans from using these treatments, such as low cultural relevance, significant time burdens, and excessive costs.
    OBJECTIVE: This study is a replication and extension of findings that \"healing attempt\"-a brief (<60-minute), digital, music-based mindfulness intervention-is a feasible and acceptable intervention for race-based anxiety in Black Americans. In this study, we tested this research question among those with little-to-no meditation experience.
    METHODS: The participants were 4 Black American adults with elevated race-based trait anxiety and little-to-no meditation experience. We used a series of multiple-baseline single-case experiments and conducted study visits on Zoom (Zoom Video Communications) to assess whether the intervention can decrease state anxiety and increase mindfulness and self-compassion in Black Americans. We also assessed feasibility and acceptability using quantitative and qualitative scales.
    RESULTS: In line with our hypotheses, \"healing attempt\" increased mindfulness/self-compassion (Tau-U range: 0.57-0.86; P<.001) and decreased state anxiety (Tau-U range: -0.93 to -0.66; P<.001), with high feasibility and acceptability (the average likelihood of recommending \"healing attempt\" was 88 out of 100).
    CONCLUSIONS: \"healing attempt\" may represent a feasible intervention for race-based anxiety in Black Americans with elevated race-based anxiety and little or no mindfulness experience. Future between-subjects randomized feasibility trials can assess whether the intervention can give rise to lasting improvements in race-based anxiety, mindfulness, and self-compassion.
    BACKGROUND: OSF Registries osf.io/k5m93; https://osf.io/k5m93.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:移动健康(mHealth)技术具有支持共享决策(SDM)和改善高血压控制的潜力。然而,我们对美国不同种族和族裔群体参与SDM和mHealth使用的个人差异的理解仍然有限。
    目的:本研究旨在调查不同种族和族裔背景的美国成人高血压患者参与SDM的程度和mHealth技术在健康相关活动中的使用情况,并研究mHealth使用是否因个体参与SDM的程度而异。
    方法:本研究使用了2017年至2020年健康信息国家趋势调查的横截面数据,这是对自我报告的高血压的美国成年人进行的,包括种族和民族数据.兴趣的暴露是种族和民族。结果是SDM和mHealth使用。使用以下项目对SDM进行了评估:“在过去的12个月中,你的健康专业人员多久做一次:让你尽可能多地参与你的医疗保健决策?“mHealth使用被定义为使用智能手机或平板电脑参与(1)做出健康决策,(2)与卫生提供者讨论卫生决策,(3)跟踪健康进展,(4)共享健康信息。使用加权多变量逻辑回归模型来检查种族和种族与SDM或mHealth使用之间的关联,并根据SDM的参与度进行分层。
    结果:这项研究包括4893名患有高血压的成年人,平均年龄为61(SD13)岁。样本是53%的女性,61%(n=3006)非西班牙裔白人,19%(n=907)非西班牙裔黑人或非裔美国人,12%(n=605)西班牙裔,4%(n=193)非西班牙裔亚洲人,和4%(n=182)非西班牙裔其他。与非西班牙裔白人成年人相比,非西班牙裔黑人成年人更有可能使用mHealth做出健康决定(调整后优势比[aOR]1.70,95%CI1.23-2.34),共享健康信息(AOR1.46,95%CI1.02-2.08),并与卫生提供者讨论卫生决策(aOR1.38,95%CI1.02-1.87)。特别是在那些始终参与SDM的人中观察到了显着的关联。与非西班牙裔白人成年人相比,亚洲成年人参与SDM的可能性较小(aOR0.51,95%CI0.26-0.99),并且更有可能使用mHealth跟踪与健康相关目标的进展(aOR2.07,95%CI1.28-3.34)。与非西班牙裔白人成年人相比,西班牙裔成年人不太可能使用mHealth共享健康信息(aOR0.47,95%CI0.33-0.67)并与健康提供者讨论健康决策(aOR0.65,95%CI0.46-0.94)。
    结论:本研究观察了美国成人高血压患者在SDM和mHealth使用方面的种族和民族差异。这些发现强调了理解SDM的参与以及在种族和种族不同的人群中使用mHealth技术的重要性。
    Mobile health (mHealth) technology has the potential to support shared decision-making (SDM) and improve hypertension control. However, our understanding of the variations in individuals\' involvement in SDM and mHealth usage across different racial and ethnic groups in the United States is still limited.
    This study aimed to investigate the extent of involvement in SDM and the usage of mHealth technology in health-related activities among US adults with hypertension from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and to examine whether the mHealth usage differed by individuals\' level of engagement in SDM.
    This study used cross-sectional data from the 2017 to 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey, which was conducted on US adults with self-reported hypertension, and race and ethnicity data were included. The exposure of interest was race and ethnicity. The outcomes were SDM and mHealth usage. SDM was assessed using an item: \"In the past 12 months, how often did your health professional: involve you in decisions about your healthcare as much as you wanted?\" mHealth usage was defined as using a smartphone or tablet to engage in (1) making health decisions, (2) discussing health decisions with health providers, (3) tracking health progress, and (4) sharing health information. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between race and ethnicity and SDM or mHealth usage adjusted for covariates and stratified by the level of engagement in SDM.
    This study included 4893 adults with hypertension, and the mean age was 61 (SD 13) years. The sample was 53% female, 61% (n=3006) non-Hispanic White, 19% (n=907) non-Hispanic Black or African American, 12% (n=605) Hispanic, 4% (n=193) non-Hispanic Asian, and 4% (n=182) non-Hispanic other. Compared to the non-Hispanic White adults, non-Hispanic Black adults were more likely to use mHealth to make health decisions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.70, 95% CI 1.23-2.34), share health information (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.08), and discuss health decisions with health providers (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.02-1.87). Significant associations were observed specifically among those who were always involved in SDM. Asian adults were less likely to be involved in SDM (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99) and were more likely to use mHealth to track progress on a health-related goal (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.28-3.34) than non-Hispanic White adults. Hispanic adults were less likely to use mHealth to share health information (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67) and discuss health decisions with health providers (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.94) compared to non-Hispanic White adults.
    This study observed racial and ethnic disparities in SDM and mHealth usage among US adults with hypertension. These findings emphasize the significance of comprehending the involvement of SDM and the usage of mHealth technology within racially and ethnically diverse populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号