Emotion expression

情感表达
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    酒精与两者都呈阳性(例如,社交能力)和消极(例如,侵略)社会结果,研究人员提出,酒精引起的情绪识别变化可能部分解释了这些影响。这里,我们系统地回顾了酒精管理研究,以阐明酒精对情绪识别的急性影响。我们还研究了各种主持人变量(即,性别,学习质量,研究设计,酒精用量,情绪识别任务和结果测量)。PsycINFO,根据预先注册的PROSPERO协议(CRD42021225392)和PRISMA方法搜索PubMed和GoogleScholar。分析的重点是消费酒精和/或非酒精的参与者之间的情绪识别差异(即,安慰剂或无酒精控制)饮料。19个独特样本(N=1271名参与者)来自17篇文章(两篇文章包括两项研究,每个都在一个独特的样本上进行)。提取样本特征的数据,酒精管理方法和情绪识别任务和结果。所有研究都将酒精饮料与安慰剂饮料进行了比较,并使用了要求参与者从面部表情的图像或视频中识别情绪的任务。否则,不同的研究方法差异很大,包括测试的酒精剂量,使用的特定情绪识别任务和评估的结果变量。对于任何情绪,酒精对情绪识别没有一致的影响。主持人变量都不会影响调查结果,除了一些迹象表明酒精可能比女性更影响男性的情绪识别能力。酒精似乎不会持续影响面部表情的正面或负面情绪识别,至少与当前在该领域使用的任务有关。
    Alcohol has been linked to both positive (e.g., sociability) and negative (e.g., aggression) social outcomes, and researchers have proposed that alcohol-induced changes in emotion recognition may partially explain these effects. Here, we systematically review alcohol administration studies to clarify the acute effects of alcohol on emotion recognition. We also investigate various moderator variables (i.e., sex, study quality, study design, alcohol dosage, emotion recognition task and outcome measure). PsycINFO, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched following a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42021225392) and PRISMA methodology. Analyses focused on differences in emotion recognition between participants consuming alcoholic and/or non-alcoholic (i.e., placebo or no-alcohol control) beverages. Nineteen unique samples (N = 1271 participants) were derived from 17 articles (two articles included two studies, each conducted on a unique sample). Data were extracted for sample characteristics, alcohol administration methods and emotion recognition tasks and outcomes. All studies compared an alcoholic beverage to a placebo beverage and used tasks that asked participants to identify emotions from images or videos of facial expressions. Otherwise, methodologies varied substantially across studies, including the alcohol dosage(s) tested, the specific emotion recognition task(s) used and the outcome variable(s) assessed. No consistent effects of alcohol on emotion recognition emerged for any emotion. None of the moderator variables affected the findings, except for some indication that alcohol may affect males\' emotion recognition abilities more so than females. Alcohol does not appear to consistently affect positive or negative emotion recognition of facial expressions, at least with the tasks currently used in the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以计算机为媒介的护理正变得越来越流行,但是关于它及其对情绪相关结果的影响的研究很少。这篇系统的文献综述旨在创建一个概述,解决研究问题:“计算机介导的护理和情感表达之间是否存在关系,感知,和情绪和(长期)情绪结果?\“
    本系统文献综述是根据系统综述和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行的,并使用了五个合格标准,即,(1)参与者:寻求支持的成年人;(2)干预:eHealth;(3)诊断标准:诊断困难的概念识别,表达,和/或调节情绪(例如,述情障碍);(4)比较:面对面护理或无比较;(5)研究设计:定量研究或定性研究。使用QualSyst工具评估质量。
    分析包括25篇研究论文。自我节奏干预似乎对情绪调节有积极作用。视频会议干预改善了治疗前后的情绪调节,但与面对面治疗相比,情绪调节恶化。
    所研究的模态和所使用的情绪测量缺乏差异,因此很难得出负责任的结论。未来的研究应该研究不同的方式如何影响情绪的实时交流,以及非语言线索如何影响这一点。
    UNASSIGNED: Computer-mediated care is becoming increasingly popular, but little research has been done on it and its effects on emotion-related outcomes. This systematic literature review aims to create an overview that addresses the research question: \"Is there a relationship between computer-mediated care and emotional expression, perception, and emotional and (long-term) emotion outcomes?\"
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and used five eligibility criteria, namely, (1) participants: adults seeking support; (2) intervention: eHealth; (3) diagnostic criteria: transdiagnostic concept of difficulty identifying, expressing, and/or regulating emotions (e.g., alexithymia); (4) comparator: either face-to-face care or no comparator; and (5) study design: quantitative studies or qualitative studies. Quality was assessed using the QualSyst tool.
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis includes 25 research papers. Self-paced interventions appear to have a positive effect on emotion regulation. Videoconferencing interventions improved emotion regulation from before to after treatment but worsened emotion regulation compared with face-to-face treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The lack of variation in the modalities studied and the emotion measurements used make it difficult to draw responsible conclusions. Future research should examine how different modalities affect the real-time communication of emotions and how non-verbal cues influence this.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    越来越多的研究探索表情符号,它们是计算机中介通信(CMC)中的视觉符号。在第一套表情符号发布后的20年里,对它的研究一直在增加,虽然在不同的方向。我们回顾了现有的表情符号研究机构,并指出了发展,用法,函数,和表情符号的应用。在这篇评论文章中,我们对表情符号的现有工作进行了系统的回顾,回顾它们是如何发展的,如何以不同的方式使用它们,他们有什么功能,在不同的领域对他们进行了什么研究。此外,我们总结了该主题的未来研究方向。
    A growing body of research explores emoji, which are visual symbols in computer mediated communication (CMC). In the 20 years since the first set of emoji was released, research on it has been on the increase, albeit in a variety of directions. We reviewed the extant body of research on emoji and noted the development, usage, function, and application of emoji. In this review article, we provide a systematic review of the extant body of work on emoji, reviewing how they have developed, how they are used differently, what functions they have and what research has been conducted on them in different domains. Furthermore, we summarize directions for future research on this topic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号