PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Computer-mediated care is becoming increasingly popular, but little research has been done on it and its effects on emotion-related outcomes. This systematic literature review aims to create an overview that addresses the research question: \"Is there a relationship between computer-mediated care and emotional expression, perception, and emotional and (long-term) emotion outcomes?\"
UNASSIGNED: This systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and used five eligibility criteria, namely, (1) participants: adults seeking support; (2) intervention: eHealth; (3) diagnostic criteria: transdiagnostic concept of difficulty identifying, expressing, and/or regulating emotions (e.g., alexithymia); (4) comparator: either face-to-face care or no comparator; and (5) study design: quantitative studies or qualitative studies. Quality was assessed using the QualSyst tool.
UNASSIGNED: The analysis includes 25 research papers. Self-paced interventions appear to have a positive effect on emotion regulation. Videoconferencing interventions improved emotion regulation from before to after treatment but worsened emotion regulation compared with face-to-face treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The lack of variation in the modalities studied and the emotion measurements used make it difficult to draw responsible conclusions. Future research should examine how different modalities affect the real-time communication of emotions and how non-verbal cues influence this.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and used five eligibility criteria, namely, (1) participants: adults seeking support; (2) intervention: eHealth; (3) diagnostic criteria: transdiagnostic concept of difficulty identifying, expressing, and/or regulating emotions (e.g., alexithymia); (4) comparator: either face-to-face care or no comparator; and (5) study design: quantitative studies or qualitative studies. Quality was assessed using the QualSyst tool.
UNASSIGNED: The analysis includes 25 research papers. Self-paced interventions appear to have a positive effect on emotion regulation. Videoconferencing interventions improved emotion regulation from before to after treatment but worsened emotion regulation compared with face-to-face treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The lack of variation in the modalities studied and the emotion measurements used make it difficult to draw responsible conclusions. Future research should examine how different modalities affect the real-time communication of emotions and how non-verbal cues influence this.
摘要：
■以计算机为媒介的护理正变得越来越流行，但是关于它及其对情绪相关结果的影响的研究很少。这篇系统的文献综述旨在创建一个概述，解决研究问题：“计算机介导的护理和情感表达之间是否存在关系，感知，和情绪和（长期）情绪结果？\“
■本系统文献综述是根据系统综述和荟萃分析（PRISMA）指南的首选报告项目进行的，并使用了五个合格标准，即,（1）参与者：寻求支持的成年人；（2）干预：eHealth；（3）诊断标准：诊断困难的概念识别，表达,和/或调节情绪(例如，述情障碍）；（4）比较：面对面护理或无比较；（5）研究设计：定量研究或定性研究。使用QualSyst工具评估质量。
■分析包括25篇研究论文。自我节奏干预似乎对情绪调节有积极作用。视频会议干预改善了治疗前后的情绪调节，但与面对面治疗相比，情绪调节恶化。
■所研究的模态和所使用的情绪测量缺乏差异，因此很难得出负责任的结论。未来的研究应该研究不同的方式如何影响情绪的实时交流，以及非语言线索如何影响这一点。
■本系统文献综述是根据系统综述和荟萃分析（PRISMA）指南的首选报告项目进行的，并使用了五个合格标准，即,（1）参与者：寻求支持的成年人；（2）干预：eHealth；（3）诊断标准：诊断困难的概念识别，表达,和/或调节情绪(例如，述情障碍）；（4）比较：面对面护理或无比较；（5）研究设计：定量研究或定性研究。使用QualSyst工具评估质量。
■分析包括25篇研究论文。自我节奏干预似乎对情绪调节有积极作用。视频会议干预改善了治疗前后的情绪调节，但与面对面治疗相比，情绪调节恶化。
■所研究的模态和所使用的情绪测量缺乏差异，因此很难得出负责任的结论。未来的研究应该研究不同的方式如何影响情绪的实时交流，以及非语言线索如何影响这一点。
