Emergence agitation

出现搅动
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:苏醒期躁动(EA)是苏醒期常见的并发症。研究人员旨在调查从麻醉后监护病房(PACU)到处于镇静状态的病房出院的儿科患者是否可以降低EA的发生率。
    方法:前瞻性随机对照研究。
    方法:本研究是在接受斜视手术的4至6岁患者中进行的。有100名患者随机分配到镇静组,这些患者在镇静状态下从PACU出院到病房,并在父母的陪同下恢复了意识(P组,n=50)和出院时完全清醒的对照组(C组,n=50)。主要结果是EA的发生率。次要结果包括救援措施,放电时间,放电点的血液动力学参数,拔管后1和2小时,和父母满意度得分。
    结果:与C组相比,P组EA的发生率显着降低(P=0.023)。C组需要采取抢救措施的患者数量高于P组(P=0.041)。P组PACU出院时间明显短于C组(P<.001)。P组患儿从PACU出院时的心率明显低于C组(P=.003),两组血氧饱和度(SpO2)和平均动脉血压比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论:在镇静状态下出院的患儿可降低接受斜视手术的EA的发生率。
    OBJECTIVE: Emergence agitation (EA) is a frequent complication during emergence. The researchers aimed to investigate whether discharged pediatric patients from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to wards under sedated status could reduce the incidence of EA.
    METHODS: Prospective randomized controlled study.
    METHODS: This study was conducted in 4 to 6 year old patients who had undergone strabismus surgeries. There were 100 patients randomly assigned to a sedated group who were discharged from PACU to the ward under a sedated state and regained consciousness accompanied with their parents (Group P, n = 50) and the control group who were fully awake when discharged (Group C, n = 50). The primary outcome was the incidence of EA. The secondary outcomes included rescue measure, discharge time, hemodynamic parameters at the point of discharge, 1 and 2 hours after extubation, and the parental satisfaction score.
    RESULTS: The incidence of EA in Group P was significantly reduced compared to Group C (P = .023). The number of patients who needed rescue measures was higher in Group C than in Group P (P = .041). The PACU discharge time in Group P was significantly shorter than in Group C (P < .001). The heart rate of the pediatric patients in Group P was significantly lower than in Group C at the point of discharge from PACU to the ward (P = .003), while the oxygen saturation (SpO2) and the mean arterial blood pressure were comparable between the two groups (P > .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients discharged to their parents under sedated status could reduce the incidence of EA undergoing strabismus surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在磁共振成像(MRI)程序之前降低儿童的焦虑水平可以获得更好的行为结果。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估咪达唑仑/γ-环糊精口服制剂的抗焦虑疗效。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了100例儿童的医疗图表,在2022年2月1日至7月31日期间,患者在全身麻醉下接受了MRI检查,无论是否使用咪达唑仑/γ-环糊精术前用药.主要结果是行为与面罩定位的比较,而次要终点是药物接受程度,抗焦虑效果评价,孩子在分离时的行为,和七氟醚需要。
    结果:咪达唑仑/γ-环糊精组58%的儿童接受了面罩定位,而对照组为22%。接受率>90%。在与父母分离的那一刻,与对照组的18%相比,未接受药物治疗的儿童不需要约束。麻醉诱导时闭眼和麻醉维持时需要较低百分比的七氟醚。麻醉出现时,药物治疗组46%的儿童与对照组66%的儿童表现出短暂的躁动。
    结论:咪达唑仑/γ-环糊精表现出良好的接受度,令人满意的抗焦虑性能,在全身麻醉下在MRI之前对儿童进行麻醉时,减少了对麻醉药的需求。
    BACKGROUND: Reducing a child\'s level of anxiety before magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures allows for better behavioral outcomes. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate anxiolytic efficacy of Midazolam/γ-cyclodextrin oral formulation.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 medical charts of children who, between 1 February and 31 July 2022, underwent MRI under general anesthesia with or without premedication with midazolam/γ-cyclodextrin. Primary outcome was comparison of behavior to facemask positioning, while secondary endpoints were degree of drugs acceptance, anxiolytic effect evaluation, child\'s behavior on separation, and sevoflurane need.
    RESULTS: Facemask positioning was accepted by 58% of the midazolam/γ-cyclodextrin group compared to 22% of children in the control group. The rate of acceptance was >90%. At the moment of separation from parent, none of the premedicated children needed to be restrained compared to 18% in the control group. A lower percentage of sevoflurane was needed for eye-closure at induction of anesthesia and for anesthesia maintenance. At emergence from anesthesia, 46% of children in the premedicated group compared to 66% of children in the control group showed transient agitation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam/γ-cyclodextrin showed a good profile of acceptance, satisfactory anxiolytic properties, and reduced need for anesthetics when administered to children before MRI under general anesthesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全身麻醉后出现躁动很常见,可能会导致不良后果,如损伤以及呼吸和循环并发症。全身麻醉后出现的躁动在鼻手术中比在其他外科手术中更常见。这项研究旨在评估在深度麻醉下或完全清醒时接受鼻手术的患者出现躁动的发生。
    方法:共202名患者(18-60岁,美国麻醉医师协会分类:I-II)在全身麻醉下进行鼻手术,随机分为两组:深拔管组(D组)和清醒拔管组(A组)。主要结果是出现躁动的发生率。次要结果包括出现波动的数量,镇静评分,生命体征,和不良事件的发生率。
    结果:D组苏醒期躁动发生率低于A组(34.7%vs.72.8%;p<0.001)。与A组相比,D组患者的里士满激动镇静量表评分较低,更高的Ramsay镇静评分,更少的激动发作,拔管时和手术后30分钟的平均动脉压降低,而这些指标在手术后90分钟没有差异。两组不良事件发生率无差异。
    结论:深度麻醉下拔管可显著减少全麻鼻部手术后苏醒期躁动,且不增加不良事件的发生率。
    背景:于2021年4月14日在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04844333)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Post-anesthetic emergence agitation is common after general anesthesia and may cause adverse consequences, such as injury as well as respiratory and circulatory complications. Emergence agitation after general anesthesia occurs more frequently in nasal surgery than in other surgical procedures. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal surgery who were extubated under deep anesthesia or when fully awake.
    METHODS: A total of 202 patients (18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification: I-II) undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia were randomized 1:1 into two groups: a deep extubation group (group D) and an awake extubation group (group A). The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation. The secondary outcomes included number of emergence agitations, sedation score, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events.
    RESULTS: The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in group D than in group A (34.7% vs. 72.8%; p < 0.001). Compared to group A, patients in group D had lower Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores, higher Ramsay sedation scores, fewer agitation episodes, and lower mean arterial pressure when extubated and 30 min after surgery, whereas these indicators did not differ 90 min after surgery. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extubation under deep anesthesia can significantly reduce emergence agitation after nasal surgery under general anesthesia without increasing the incidence of adverse events.
    BACKGROUND: Registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04844333) on 14/04/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    雷马唑仑是一种超短作用的苯并二氮卓类药物。很少有研究评估以瑞咪唑安定为基础的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)对苏醒期躁动(EA)的影响。本研究旨在比较使用雷米马唑仑和地氟烷的TIVA之间EA的发生率和严重程度。
    这项前瞻性随机对照研究纳入了76名在全身麻醉下接受鼻部手术的患者。患者被随机分为两组,每组38例:地氟醚-一氧化二氮(N2O)(DN)组和瑞马唑仑-瑞芬太尼(RR)组。从诱导到出现,每组使用相同的方案,除了根据分配的组在麻醉维持期间使用不同的麻醉药外:DN组使用地氟醚和一氧化二氮,RR组使用雷米唑仑和瑞芬太尼.EA的发生率作为主要结果使用三个量表进行评估:Ricker镇静-激动量表,里士满激动镇静量表,和Aono的四点激动量表。此外,比较出现时的血流动力学变化和术后窒息感。
    在所有三种类型的EA评估量表中,RR组的EA发生率均显着低于DN组(均P<0.001)。在出现期间,两组患者的心率变化存在差异(P=0.002)。RR组的窒息感低于DN组(P=0.027)。
    RR降低了在全身麻醉下接受鼻腔手术的患者中EA的发生率和严重程度。此外,RR有利于控制血流动力学和术后窒息感。
    UNASSIGNED: Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. Few studies have evaluated the effects of remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on emergence agitation (EA). This study aimed to compare the incidence and severity of EA between TIVA using remimazolam and desflurane.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 76 patients who underwent nasal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into two groups of 38 each: desflurane-nitrous oxide (N2O) (DN) and remimazolam-remifentanil (RR) groups. The same protocol was used for each group from induction to emergence, except for the use of different anesthetics during maintenance of anesthesia according to the assigned group: desflurane and nitrous oxide for the DN group and remimazolam and remifentanil for the RR group. The incidence of EA as the primary outcome was evaluated using three scales: Ricker Sedation-Agitation Scale, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Aono\'s four-point agitation scale. Additionally, hemodynamic changes during emergence and postoperative sense of suffocation were compared.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of EA was significantly lower in the RR group than in the DN group in all three types of EA assessment scales (all P < 0.001). During emergence, the change in heart rate differed between the two groups (P = 0.002). The sense of suffocation was lower in the RR group than in the DN group (P = 0.027).
    UNASSIGNED: RR reduced the incidence and severity of EA in patients undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia. In addition, RR was favorable for managing hemodynamics and postoperative sense of suffocation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:夜间手术会影响患者的预后,其机制可能与昼夜节律有关,影响正常生理功能和病理生理变化。褪黑激素主要是一种具有催眠和慢性生物效应的昼夜节律激素,从而通过影响炎症因子的表达和生化代谢影响疾病的预后。本研究旨在观察昼夜节律对老年胸腔镜肺癌手术患者苏醒期躁动和术后早期谵妄的影响,并探讨褪黑素的可能调节作用。
    方法:这种前瞻性,观察,队列研究将涉及240名患者。患者将根据手术时间常规分为三组:T1(8:00-14:00),T2(14:00-20:00)和T3组(20:00-08:00)。主要结果将是在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)中通过里士满激动和镇静量表(RASS)评估的出现躁动的发生率。次要结果将包括术后第1天通过混淆评估方法(CAM)评估的术后早期谵妄发生率,通过PACU中的数字评定量表(NRS)评估的疼痛状态,术后第1天的睡眠质量和围手术期血浆褪黑素的变化,时钟基因和炎症因子水平。术后手术并发症,还将评估重症监护病房的入院和住院时间。
    结论:本文描述了研究昼夜节律对接受胸腔镜肺癌手术的老年人的苏醒期躁动和术后早期谵妄的影响的方案,以及探索褪黑素的潜在调节作用。通过阐明昼夜节律影响术后恢复的机制,我们的目标是开发一种在围手术期实现快速康复的新方法。
    背景:该研究于2020年11月26日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2000040252)注册,并于2022年9月4日更新。
    BACKGROUND: Surgeries conducted at night can impact patients\' prognosis, and the mechanism may be related to circadian rhythm, which influence normal physiological functions and pathophysiological changes. Melatonin is primarily a circadian hormone with hypnotic and chronobiotic effects, thereby affecting disease outcomes through influencing the expression of inflammatory factors and biochemical metabolism. This study aims to observe the effects of circadian rhythms on emergence agitation and early postoperative delirium of older individuals undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery and explore the possible regulatory role of melatonin.
    METHODS: This prospective, observational, cohort study will involve 240 patients. Patients will be routinely divided into three groups based on the time of the surgery: T1 (8:00-14:00), T2 (14:00-20:00) and T3 group (20:00-08:00). The primary outcome will be the incidence of emergence agitation assessed via the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes will include the incidence of early postoperative delirium assessed via the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) on postoperative day 1, pain status assessed via the numerical rating scale (NRS) in the PACU, sleep quality on postoperative day 1 and changes in perioperative plasma melatonin, clock genes and inflammatory factor levels. Postoperative surgical complications, intensive care unit admission and hospital length of stay will also be evaluated.
    CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes a protocol for investigating the effects of circadian rhythms on emergence agitation and early postoperative delirium of older individuals undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, as well as exploring the potential regulatory role of melatonin. By elucidating the mechanism by which circadian rhythms impact postoperative recovery, we aim to develop a new approach for achieving rapid recovery during perioperative period.
    BACKGROUND: The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2000040252) on November 26, 2020, and refreshed on September 4, 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:全身麻醉后躁动(EA)在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者中很常见。由于最近的全球事件,如新冠肺炎大流行和战争,PTSD并不罕见。因此,一个可靠的,降低EA发生率的成本有效的麻醉方案至关重要.因此,我们的目的是比较三种不同的干预措施,以避免接受妇科腹腔镜手术的PTSD患者的EA.参与者分为四组:1:进行术前放松技术(深呼吸运动和渐进性肌肉放松[PMR]);2:术中服用氯胺酮;3:应用上述两种策略,4作为对照。
    方法:这项研究是对计划进行妇科腹腔镜检查的144名成年女性进行的,随机分为四组:三个干预组和对照组(每组36)。18-45岁的女性,诊断为PTSD的患者纳入研究.有重大神经系统病史的患者,心血管,新陈代谢,呼吸,或肾脏疾病被排除。任何报告使用精神科药物的患者也被排除在研究之外。使用IBMSPSSStatistics软件版本26分析数据。Kolmogorov-Smirnov用于验证变量分布的正态。计算赔率以阐明干预组和对照组之间关联的强度和方向。在p值≤0.05时,数据被认为是显著的。
    结果:与第4组相比,第1、2和3组在术中和术后直到24小时的心率(HR)和平均动脉血压(MABP)均显着降低(p<0.001)。术中HR下降百分比有显著统计学差别。所有干预组术后MABP下降百分比均较高,差异无统计学意义。除了第1组比第4组有统计学意义(12.28±11.77和6.10±7.24,p=0.025)。与第4组相比,干预组1、2和3的视觉模拟量表测量值明显较少。关于Riker镇静-激动评分,第1组非激动的可能性是85倍(85(15.938-453.307),p<0.001),第2组是不激动的175倍(175(19.932-1536.448),p<0.001),第3组不受搅动的影响。
    结论:术前放松技术(呼吸练习和PMR)可显著降低HR,MABP,VAS评分,和EA比控制。这些效果与术中注射氯胺酮或两者的组合(松弛技术和氯胺酮)没有显着差异。我们建议对PTSD进行常规术前筛查,并在PTSD阳性病例的术前准备方案中应用放松技术(呼吸练习和PMR),以及术前放松技术的常规实际应用。通常,对使用术前放松技术的进一步研究可能具有成本效益。
    OBJECTIVE: Emergence agitation (EA) after general anesthesia is common in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Due to the recent worldwide events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and wars, PTSD is not rare. Accordingly, a reliable, cost-effective anesthetic protocol to lower the incidence of EA is crucial. Therefore, we aimed to compare three different interventions for avoiding EA in PTSD patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Participants were divided into four groups: 1: performing pre-operative relaxation techniques (deep breathing exercise and progressive muscle relaxation [PMR]); 2: administrating intra-operative Ketamine; 3: applying both previously mentioned strategies and 4 as controls.
    METHODS: This study was carried out on 144 adult women scheduled for gynecological laparoscopy, randomly allocated into four groups: three intervention groups and a control group (36 each). Women aged 18-45 years old, with a diagnosis of PTSD were included in the study. Patients with a positive history of major neurological, cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory, or renal disease were excluded. Any patient who reported the use of psychiatric drugs were also excluded from the study. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 26. Kolmogorov- Smirnov was used to verify the normality of the distribution of variables. Odds ratio was calculated to clarify the strength and direction of the association between intervention groups and control. Data was deemed significant at a p-value ≤0.05.
    RESULTS: Heart rate (HR) and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MABP) intra-operative and post-operative till 24 hours were significantly lower in groups 1, 2, and 3 compared to group 4 (p<0.001). There was a significant statistical difference in the intraoperative HR percentage decrease. MABP percentage decrease post-operative was higher in all the intervention groups with no statistically significant difference, except for group 1 compared to group 4, which was statistically significant (12.28 ± 11.77 and 6.10 ± 7.24, p=0.025). Visual Analogue Scale measurements were significantly less in the intervention groups 1, 2, and 3 compared to group 4. On Riker sedation-agitation scores, group 1 was 85 times more likely to be non-agitated (85 (15.938 - 453.307), p<0.001), group 2 was 175 times more likely to be non-agitated (175 (19.932-1536.448), p<0.001) and group 3 was protected against agitation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative relaxation techniques (breathing exercises and PMR) significantly lowered HR, MABP, VAS score, and EA than controls. These effects were not significantly different from intra-operative ketamine injection or the combination of both (relaxation techniques and ketamine). We recommend routine pre-operative screening for PTSD and the application of relaxation techniques (breathing exercises and PMR) in the pre-operative preparation protocol of PTSD-positive cases as well as routine practical application of preoperative relaxation techniques. Further studies on using pre-operative relaxation techniques in general could be cost-effective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to investigate the effect of pre-operative sleep quality on post-operative pain and emergence agitation.
    METHODS: Our study was performed 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II and 18-65 years of age. The patients were divided into poor (Group A, n = 40) and good sleep quality (Group B, n = 40). All patients were operated on under standard general anesthesia. The emergence agitation and pain status of all groups were evaluated in the recovery room and post-operative period.
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding demographic data. Post-operative numeric rating scale scores and analgesic consumption were significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding post-operative emergence agitation and extubation quality (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: In our study, poor pre-operative sleep quality increases post-operative pain and analgesic consumption; however, emergence agitation is not associated with sleep quality in the pre-operative period.
    OBJECTIVE: Nuestro estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar el efecto de la calidad del sueño preoperatorio sobre el dolor posoperatorio y la agitación de emergencia.
    UNASSIGNED: Nuestro estudio se realizó en 80 pacientes con ASA I-II y de 18 a 65 años de edad. Los pacientes se dividieron en mala (grupo A, n = 40) y buena calidad del sueño (grupo B, n = 40). Todos los pacientes fueron operados bajo anestesia general estándar. La agitación de emergencia y el estado del dolor de todos los grupos se evaluaron en la sala de recuperación y en el período postoperatorio.
    RESULTS: No hubo diferencia significativa entre los grupos con respecto a los datos demográficos. Las puntuaciones NRS postoperatorias y el consumo de analgésicos fueron significativamente más altos en el Grupo A que en el Grupo B (p < 0.05). No hubo diferencia significativa entre los grupos con respecto a la agitación de emergencia postoperatoria y la calidad de la extubación (p > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: En nuestro estudio, la mala calidad del sueño preoperatorio aumenta el dolor posoperatorio y el consumo de analgésicos; sin embargo, la agitación de emergencia no se asocia con la calidad del sueño en el período preoperatorio.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:牙科焦虑是儿科患者在牙科就诊期间发生的广泛并发症,并可能导致不良并发症。Esketamine可能对焦虑有效。
    目的:本研究的目的是比较右美托咪定-艾氯胺酮联合用药与单用右美托咪定对学龄前全麻牙科治疗儿童牙科焦虑的影响。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,双盲,随机对照试验。共有84例患者在全身麻醉下进行选择性门诊龋齿治疗。患者随机预先给药鼻内右美托咪定(D组)或鼻内右美托咪定-艾氯胺酮(DS组)。主要结果是手术后2小时通过改良儿童牙科焦虑量表(MCDAS)评估的牙科焦虑水平。次要结果包括手术后1天和7天的牙科焦虑水平,2小时牙科焦虑的发生率,1天,手术后7天,镇静起效时间,镇静的整体成功,接受掩模感应,术后疼痛强度,PACU中出现躁动的发生率,不良反应,HR,术前(基线)和研究药物递送结束后10、20和30分钟的SpO2。
    结果:2h时,DS组牙科焦虑低于D组,1天,和术后7天(P分别为0.04、0.004和0.006)。在2h时,DS组的牙科焦虑发生率低于D组(53%vs76%,P=0.03),1天(47%vs71%,P=0.04),和7天(44%vs71%,术后P=0.02)。DS组的镇静成功率较高(P=0.03),但用药后的MAS评分较低(P=0.005),血流动力学较平稳(P<0.01)。DS组麻醉恢复期间的苏醒躁动发生率(P=0.03)和术后疼痛强度(P=0.006)明显低于D组。两组不良反应发生情况相似(P>0.05)。
    结论:我们没有分析和纠正重复应用MCDAS引起的学习效果,并通过电话随访获得术后1天的MCDAS评分。
    结论:与单独使用右美托咪定的术前用药相比,术前滴鼻右美托咪定联合艾氯胺酮可显著改善全身麻醉下接受牙科治疗的学龄前儿童的牙科焦虑。
    Dental anxiety is a widespread complication occurring in pediatric patients during dental visits and may lead to undesirable complications. Esketamine may be effective in anxiety.
    The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of premedication with a dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination compared with dexmedetomidine alone on dental anxiety in preschool children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia.
    This is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. A total of 84 patients were scheduled for elective outpatient dental caries treatment under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly premedicated with intranasal dexmedetomidine (group D) or intranasal dexmedetomidine-esketamine (group DS). The primary outcome was the level of dental anxiety assessed by the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) at 2 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included level of dental anxiety at 1 day and 7 days after surgery, the incidence of dental anxiety at 2 h, 1 day, and 7 days after surgery, sedation onset time, overall success of sedation, acceptance of mask induction, postoperative pain intensity, incidence of emergence agitation in PACU, adverse reactions, HR, and SpO2 before premedication (baseline) and at 10, 20, and 30 min after the end of study drug delivery.
    The dental anxiety in group DS was lower than that in group D at 2 h, 1 day, and 7 days postoperatively (P = 0.04, 0.004, and 0.006, respectively). The incidences of dental anxiety in group DS were lower than those in group D at 2 h (53 % vs 76 %, P = 0.03), 1 day (47 % vs 71 %, P = 0.04), and 7 days (44 % vs 71 %, P = 0.02) after surgery. Group DS had a higher success rate of sedation (P = 0.03) but showed a lower MAS score (P = 0.005) and smoother hemodynamics (P < 0.01) after drug administration than group D. Group DS showed a significantly lower incidence rate of emergence agitation (P = 0.03) and postoperative pain intensity (P = 0.006) than that in group D during the anesthesia recovery time. The occurrence of adverse reactions was similar in both groups (P > 0.05).
    We did not analyze and correct for the learning effect caused by repeated applications of the MCDAS and MCDAS scores on the 1 day after surgery were obtained by telephone follow-up.
    Compared to premedication with dexmedetomidine alone, premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine could significantly improve dental anxiety in preschool children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:一些研究报道,接受耳鼻咽喉科(ENT)和眼科手术的儿科患者出现躁动(EA)的发生率较高。患有EA的孩子往往有自我伤害的风险,有更长的恢复期和延迟出院。因此,需要对EA进行监控,并应强调风险因素以实施预防措施。这项研究的目的是描述EA并确定儿科眼科或ENT手术后的危险因素。
    方法:在2021年9月至2021年12月之间,对100名0-12岁接受眼科或耳鼻喉科手术的儿童进行了横断面研究。使用Watcha量表观察和记录EA,在麻醉后监护病房(PACU)的任何时候都定义为3或4级。疼痛强度与面部分级,腿,活动,哭吧,手术后的协作性(FLACC)量表。患者和手术相关特征,EA的行为标准,客观记录药物和非药物干预措施以及康复结局.建立二元logistic回归模型以确定EA的相关因素。
    结果:从分析的100名儿童中,58人是男性,42人是女性,44例患者接受眼科手术和56例ENT手术。中位年龄为6(IQR4-7)岁。儿科学中EA的总发生率为30%(ENT为34.5%,眼科手术为24.4%)。术前改良Yale术前焦虑量表(m-YPAS)评分高(OR=1.19,95CI1.06~1.33,P=0.003)和术后FLACC评分高(OR=3.36,95CI1.88~6.02,P<0.001)是EA的危险因素。
    结论:这项研究发现,在眼科或耳鼻喉手术后的儿童中,术前焦虑和术后疼痛与EA相关。术前焦虑评估和管理,在常规护理中应考虑辅助镇痛治疗。
    Some studies reported that pediatric patients undergoing otorhinolaryngology (ENT) and ophthalmic surgeries have higher incidences of emergence agitation (EA). Children with EA tend to carry the risk of self-harm, have longer periods of recovery and delayed hospital discharge. Consequently, EA needs to be monitored and risk factors ought to be emphasized to implement preventative measures. The objective of this study was to describe EA and to identify risk factors after pediatric ophthalmic or ENT surgery.
    Between September 2021 and December 2021, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 100 children aged of 0-12 years who underwent ophthalmic or ENT surgery. The Watcha scale was used to observe and record EA, which was defined at levels of 3 or 4 at any time in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The pain intensity was graded with the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale after surgery. Patient and surgery-related characteristics, the behavioral criteria of EA, the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions and recovery outcomes were objectively recorded. A binary logistic regression model was constructed to identify the associated factors of EA.
    From the 100 analyzed children, 58 were males and 42 were females, and 44 patients received ophthalmic surgery and 56 ENT surgery. The median age was 6 (IQR 4-7) years. The overall incidence of EA among pediatrics was 30% (34.5% for ENT and 24.4% for ophthalmic surgery). High preoperative modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety scale (m-YPAS) grade (OR = 1.19, 95%CI 1.06-1.33, P = 0.003) and high postoperative FLACC score (OR = 3.36, 95%CI 1.88-6.02, P < 0.001) were risk factors for EA.
    This study identified that preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain are associated with EA in children after ophthalmic or ENT surgery. Preoperative anxiety assessment and management, and administration of adjunct analgesic treatments should be considered in the routine care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:出现躁动或出现谵妄是儿科麻醉中病因不明的常见并发症。据报道,小儿麻醉出现谵妄(PAED)最常见于年幼儿童,约30%的5-6岁儿童可能发生。暴露于麻醉剂可能会导致PAED,我们假设减少挥发性麻醉药暴露的管理策略可能会降低PAED.脑电图(EEG)信号捕获和显示的脑功能监测仪在麻醉过程中七氟醚浓度和无意识水平的变化,这些脑电图特征可用于指导麻醉药的滴定。
    方法:单中心,平行组,双臂,将进行1:1分配比的优势试验,以比较标准七氟醚麻醉(维持在1.0MAC)和脑电图引导麻醉(通过监测脑电图特征确定的维持手术麻醉的最低浓度)后PAED的发生率.年龄在1至6岁之间的参与者将被随机分配接受标准(n=90)或脑电图引导(n=90)麻醉。PAED评分将在到达时以及5、10、15和30分钟后由PACU中的盲观察者评估。
    结论:积极使用脑功能监测的麻醉管理有望在不影响手术麻醉的情况下减少七氟醚的暴露。我们预计这种减少的暴露应该有助于预防PAED。常规给药可能被认为是标准水平的麻醉剂如1.0MAC七氟醚可能是过量的并且可能与不利的后遗症如PAED有关。
    背景:日本临床试验注册(jRCT)jRCTs032210248。预计于2021年8月17日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Emergence agitation or emergence delirium is a common complication of unknown etiology in pediatric anesthesia. Pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) has been reported most commonly in younger children and may occur in about 30% of children up to 5-6 years old. Exposure to anesthetic agents may contribute to PAED, and we hypothesized that a management strategy to minimize exposure to volatile anesthetics may reduce PAED. Electroencephalography (EEG) signatures captured and displayed by brain function monitors during anesthesia change with concentration of sevoflurane and level of unconsciousness, and these EEG signatures may be used to inform titration of anesthetics.
    METHODS: A single-center, parallel-group, two-arm, superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio will be performed to compare the incidence of PAED following standard sevoflurane anesthesia (maintained at 1.0MAC) and EEG-guided anesthesia (minimum concentration to sustain surgical anesthesia as determined by monitoring of EEG signatures). Participants between 1 and 6 years of age undergoing surgical procedures involving minimal postoperative pain will be randomly assigned to receive standard (n = 90) or EEG-guided (n = 90) anesthesia. PAED score will be assessed by a blinded observer in the PACU on arrival and after 5, 10, 15, and 30 min.
    CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia management with proactive use of brain function monitoring is expected to reduce exposure to sevoflurane without compromising surgical anesthesia. We expect this reduced exposure should help prevent PAED. Routinely administering what may be considered standard levels of anesthetic such as 1.0 MAC sevoflurane may be excessive and potentially associated with unfavorable sequelae such as PAED.
    BACKGROUND: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) jRCTs032210248. Prospectively registered on 17 August 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号