背景:经前综合征影响许多育龄期妇女,并经常破坏她们的社会关系和工作。这项研究旨在比较积极心理学和体力活动对抑郁症的影响,焦虑,以及经前综合症学生的压力。
方法:在这项采用盲法数据分析的四组平行临床试验中,根据纳入/排除标准招募了120名经历了经前综合征的合格学生,并随机分为四组(n=30),其中包括三个实验组作为积极心理学。身体活动,和积极心理学,身体活动,和对照组,使用简单的随机化方法。4组均在干预前完成经前期综合征筛查和DASS-21问卷。然后,积极心理干预组每周接受8次70-90分钟的干预,第二组接受八周有氧运动干预,第三组接受积极心理和身体活动干预,为期8周。对照组不接受任何干预措施。所有四组在干预后立即完成DASS-21,两个月后完成。在这项研究中,参与者和调查人员没有失明;然而,分析师是。招聘过程于2018年9月至2019年3月进行。一百二十名参与者完成了这项研究。使用SPSS(v18)收集和分析数据。
结果:干预前和干预后立即,抑郁症没有统计学上的显著差异,焦虑,积极心理学中的压力平均得分,身体活动,积极心理学,体力活动组和对照组(p≥0.05)。然而,干预后两个月,四组之间存在显著差异,因此三个干预组的得分与对照组之间存在差异(p<0.05)。积极心理学之间没有显着差异,和身体活动组。没有观察到显著的不良事件或副作用。
结论:我们的研究结果支持使用基于积极心理学的有氧运动和教育干预措施作为非药物干预措施来减少焦虑。抑郁症,和压力。这项研究应该在不同的环境中重复。
■伊朗临床试验注册;https://irct。behdash.govir/trial/32363(IRCT20130812014333N97),注册(11/08/2018)。
BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome affects many women in their reproductive years and often disrupts their social connections and work. This
study aimed to compare the effects of positive psychology and physical activity on depression, anxiety, and stress among students with premenstrual syndrome.
METHODS: In this four-group parallel clinical
trial with blinded data analysis, 120 eligible students who experienced premenstrual syndrome were recruited based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and randomly allocated to four groups (n = 30) including three experiment groups as positive psychology, physical activity, and positive psychology, physical activity, and control group, using a simple randomization method. All four groups completed premenstrual syndrome screening and the DASS-21 questionnaire before the intervention. Then, the positive psychology intervention group received eight sessions of 70-90 min weekly intervention, the second group received eight weeks of aerobic physical activity intervention, and the third group received positive psychology and physical activity intervention for eight weeks. The control group did not receive any interventions. The DASS-21 was completed immediately after the intervention and two months later by all four groups. In this
study, the participants and investigators were not blinded; however, the analysts were. The recruitment process took place from September 2018 to March 2019. One hundred twenty participants fulfilled the
study. The Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS (v18).
RESULTS: Before and immediately after the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in depression, anxiety, and stress mean scores among the positive psychology, physical activity, positive psychology, and physical activity and control groups (p ≥ 0.05). However, two months after the intervention, a significant difference was observed between the four groups so there was a difference between the scores of the three intervention groups and the control group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between positive psychology, and physical activity groups. No significant adverse events or side effects were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings supported the use of aerobic physical activity and educational interventions based on positive psychology as non-pharmacologic interventions to reduce anxiety, depression, and stress. This research should be replicated in different settings.
UNASSIGNED: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/
trial/32363 (IRCT20130812014333N97), registered (11/08/2018).