BACKGROUND: It is a common preconception that young individuals sustaining hip fractures have alcohol and/or drug use disorder. It is important to evaluate the actual use to avoid complications and plan the rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to assess alcohol and drug consumption in hip fracture patients <60 years using the validated Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) scores. We secondarily investigated the agreement between the instruments and the physicians\' clinical evaluation of usage.
METHODS: This is a sub-study of 91 women and 127 men from a multicenter cohort study of patients with an acute hip fracture treated at four hospitals in Denmark and Sweden. AUDIT and DUDIT forms were completed by the patients. In addition, the researchers made an evaluation of the patients\' alcohol/drug use based on direct patient contact and information on previous alcohol/drug use from medical charts. AUDIT ranges 0-40 with 6 (women) and 8 (men) as the cut-off for hazardous use. DUDIT ranges 0-44 with cut-offs of 2 and 6 indicating drug-related problems.
RESULTS: According to the AUDIT, 29 % of the patients had a hazardous alcohol use (25 % women, 31 % men), whilst the clinical evaluation identified 26 % (24 % women, 28 % men). However, there was a low agreement between \"the clinical eye\" and AUDIT, as the clinical evaluation only correctly identified 35 of 56 individuals with AUDIT-scores indicating hazardous alcohol use. DUDIT equaled drug related problems in 8 % (5 % women, 10 % men), the clinical evaluation depicted 8 % with drug related problems (4 % women, 10 % men). The agreement was low between \"the clinical eye\" and DUDIT; only 7 of 15 with DUDIT-scores indicating drug related problems were correctly identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Hazardous alcohol consumption is more common in non-elderly hip fracture patients than in the general population. Considering both self-reported alcohol use and clinical evaluation, women have almost as high rate as men. DUDIT indicated drug related problems to be slightly more common than in the population. Still, a majority did not exhibit troublesome use of neither alcohol nor drugs. The two screening methods do not identify the same individuals, and further investigation in clinical practice is needed.

BACKGROUND: Patients who make 5 or more visits per year to hospital emergency departments (EDs) are usually considered ED frequent users (FUs). This study aims to better characterize the influence of alcohol and other drug use-related disorders in this phenomenon in a European Mediterranean country with public, universal, tax-financed healthcare system.
METHODS: Matched case-control study. Cases were adults between 18 and 65 years old who consulted 5 or more times the ED of a tertiary hospital in Spain between December 2018 and November 2019. Each case was assigned a control of the same age and gender, who appeared to the ED on the same day, but who made 4 visits or less to the service during the study period. The electronic record of the first ED visit during this period was used to extract the variables of interest: emergency care received, clinical and social characteristics. Predictors of frequent ED use were identified with conditional logistic regression.
RESULTS: 609 case-control pairs (total n = 1,218) were selected. History of alcohol-related conditions (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.82 [95% CI: 1.26-2.64] p = 0.001) and also other drug use-related disorders (AOR = 1.50 [95% CI: 1.11-2.03] p = 0.009) significantly increased the probability of frequent use of emergency services.
CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol-related conditions and other drug use-related disorders must be evaluated in all ED FUs. Specific action protocols to concurrently address repeated attendance and addictions in the emergency room could be a good tool to reduce frequent ED use.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids (GCs) play a crucial role in the treatment of many rheumatic diseases regarding their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Inappropriate use of GCs can exacerbate GC-related problems besides complex treatment regimens and miscellaneous well-established adverse events. Although several guidelines exist for managing these problems, there is lack of real-life studies evaluating the problems at the patient level. This study aims to identify GC-related problems among patients with rheumatic diseases and address how they have been solved.
METHODS: This prospective follow-up study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022 at a university rheumatology outpatient clinic and included patients using GCs. A clinical pharmacist assessed patients for possible GC-related problems at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Identified problems, their causes, interventions to address these problems, and their outcomes were categorized using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE v9.1) classification system. The resolution of the problems was evaluated at the patient\'s next follow-up visit.
RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included, and 236 GC-related problems were identified in 66% of the patients. Adverse drug events (possible) accounted for the highest proportion of GC-related problems (94.1%), and the most common causes were lack of laboratory monitoring of GC-related adverse events (41.5%) and lack of drug treatment despite existing indications (39.8%). The median cumulative prednisolone dose was higher in patients with GC-related problems (3115 vs. 5455 mg, p = 0.007). The clinical pharmacist suggested 381 interventions: 47.7% (n = 182) at the \'prescriber level\', 31.8% (n = 121) at the \'patient level\', and 20.5% (n = 78) at the \'drug level\'. Of those interventions, 98% were accepted, and 80.1% of the problems were solved.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the prevalence of GC-related problems is high in patients with rheumatic diseases. Integrating clinical pharmacists into the multidisciplinary rheumatology team provides an advantage in effectively identifying and managing GC-related problems at an early stage.

UNASSIGNED: Electrolyte disorder (ED) is frequently encountered critically ill patients during admission or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to determine the frequency of ED encountered in ICU patients to evaluate the relationship of ED with drugs.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective, multicenter study was conducted in the medical and anesthesiology ICUs of two training and research hospitals and included patients with at least one ED during admission or hospitalization in the ICUs. The relationship between ED and the drug was evaluated by calculating the logistic probabilistic method scale (LPMS) and the expert panel\'s evaluation. The correlation between EDs and LPMS was determined using Kendal tau. A binary logistic regression model was preferred in the analysis of factors related to ED. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 117 patients were included in the study. A total of 165 EDs were detected, including at least one in 88 (75.2%) patients. According to the expert panel, 61 (21.7%) of EDs were drug-related, whereas according to the LPMS, 111 (39.6%) (p < 0.001). Mortality (50% vs. 13.7%) and mechanical ventilation rates (52.2% vs. 17.2%) were significantly higher in patients with ED (p < 0.001). Patients with ED had 8.352 times higher odds of exhibiting mortality (OR: 8.352, %95 CI: 1.598-43.648, p: 0.012) and need mechanical ventilation with higher odds of 3.229 (OR: 3.229 95% CI: 0.815-12.787 p: 0.045). Patient who required enteral or parenteral feeding were associated with an increased likelihood of exhibiting ED (respectively OR: 30.057, %95 CI: 2.265-398.892, p: 0.01, OR: 5.537, %95 CI: 1.406-21.800, p: 0.014).
UNASSIGNED: EDs are very common in the ICU. Dysnatremia was detected more commonly in other EDs. It has also been found that patients with ED are more often under mechanical ventilation, have more prolonged hospitalizations, and have higher mortality rates than patients without ED. The suitability of LPMS for assessing ED-drug relationships in the ICU context is questioned.

UNASSIGNED: In 2021, a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system with an integrated clinical decision support system (CDSS) was implemented at a tertiary care center for the treatment of mental health conditions in Lübeck, Germany. To date, no study has been reported on the types and prevalence of drug-related problems (DRPs) before and after CPOE implementation in a psychiatric inpatient setting. The aim of this retrospective before-and-after cohort study was to investigate whether the implementation of a CPOE system with CDSS accompanied by the introduction of regular medication plausibility checks by a pharmacist led to a decrease of DRPs during hospitalization and unsolved DRPs at discharge in psychiatric inpatients.
UNASSIGNED: Medication charts and electronic patient records of 54 patients before (cohort I) and 65 patients after (cohort II) CPOE implementation were reviewed retrospectively by a clinical pharmacist. All identified DRPs were collected and classified based on \'The PCNE Classification V9.1\', the German database DokuPIK, and the \'NCC MERP Taxonomy of Medication Errors\'.
UNASSIGNED: 325 DRPs were identified in 54 patients with a mean of 6 DRPs per patient and 151.9 DRPs per 1000 patient days in cohort I. In cohort II, 214 DRPs were identified in 65 patients with a mean of 3.3 DRPs per patient and 81.3 DRPs per 1000 patient days. The odds of having a DRP were significantly lower in cohort II (OR=0.545, 95% CI 0.412-0.721, p<0.001). The most frequent DRP in cohort I was an erroneous prescription (n=113, 34.8%), which was significantly reduced in cohort II (n=12, 5.6%, p<0.001). During the retrospective in-depth review, more DRPs were identified than during the daily plausibility analyses. At hospital discharge, patients had significantly less unsolved DRPs in cohort II than in cohort I.
UNASSIGNED: The implementation of a CPOE system with an integrated CDSS reduced the overall prevalence of DRPs, especially of prescription errors, and led to a smaller rate of unsolved DRPs in psychiatric inpatients at hospital discharge. Not all DRPs were found by plausibility analyses based on the medication charts. A more interactive and interdisciplinary patient-oriented approach might result in the resolution of more DRPs.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical decision support systems (PDSSs) use reasoning software to match patient data to modelled situations likely to cause drug-related problems (DRPs) or adverse drug events. To aid decision-making, modelled situations must be linked to well-defined systemic clinical risks.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain expert consensus on the level of clinical risk for patients associated with each modelled situation that could be addressed using a PDSS.
METHODS: A two-round e-Delphi survey was conducted from February to April 2022, involving 20 experts from four French-speaking countries. Participants had to rate modelled situations on two five-point Likert scales, assessing the likelihood of clinical consequences and their severity. The degree of consensus was determined as the proportion of participants providing risk scores in line with the median. The combined median scores for likelihood and severity provided the level of risk according to the Clinical Risk Situation for Patients (CRiSP) scale, formalized via validated tools.
RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus (≥ 75% agreement) on 48 out of 52 modelled clinical situations. Among these, 45 were categorized as high or extreme risk. The most common DRP identified was overdosing, accounting for 22% of cases. Furthermore, DRPs involving cardiovascular, psychiatric, and endocrinological drug classes were prevalent, constituting 45, 13, and 9% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Through consensus, our study identified 45 modelled clinical situations associated with high or extreme risks. This study highlights the interest of using PDSSs to prevent harm in patients and, on a large scale, document the impact of the pharmacist in preventing, intercepting and managing iatrogenic drug risk.

UNASSIGNED: Prescribing DOACs presents with challenges in the elderly and patients with renal and hepatic impairment. To mitigate safety risks, pharmacists have a role in detection, prevention, and resolution of DOAC-associated drug-related problems (DRPs).
UNASSIGNED: To identify the types of DOAC-associated DRPs in patients on DOAC therapy and factors that predispose patients to DOAC-associated DRPs.
UNASSIGNED: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in SGH from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019, on patients prescribed with a DOAC (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban). Data were electronically extracted for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and details of DOAC-related DRPs identified by pharmacists. Matching of DRP group to non-DRP group at a ratio of 1:2 based on gender, race, and DOAC was performed. The DRP group included patients with detected DRPs while non-DRP group included patients without them. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize patient characteristics and types of DOAC-associated DRPs. In the matched population, conditional logistic regression was used to calculate unadjusted (UOR) and adjusted odds (AOR) ratio to detect association of DOAC-associated DRPs with age, renal function, ≥2 comorbidities, and DOAC indication (atrial fibrillation [AF] vs venous thromboembolism).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 8432 patients prescribed DOACs were analyzed, which consisted of 827 (9.8%) and 7602 (90.2%) patients with DRPs and no DRPs, respectively. The top DOAC-associated DRP was inappropriate drug regimen (n = 487, 60.1%). After matching, 2403 patients were analyzed, consisting of 801 patients from DRP group and 1602 from non-DRP group. Factors associated with DOAC-associated DRPs were statistically significant for renal function at creatinine clearance (CrCl) of >30 to 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (AOR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.14-1.76; P = .002), 15 to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.42-2.66; P < .001), and <15 mL/min/1.73m2 (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.13-4.88; P = .022), respectively, compared with a CrCl of >50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and DOAC indication for AF (AOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.47-2.30; P < .001) compared with venous thromboembolism.
UNASSIGNED: Inappropriate drug regimen was the most common DOAC-associated DRP. Impaired renal function and patients with AF increased the likelihood of DOAC-associated DRPs.

BACKGROUND: Negative outcomes associated with medications (NOM) and drug-related problems (DRP) significantly impact individuals with kidney replacement therapy (KRT) given the complexities of managing kidney disease and associated comorbidities. The present study aims to assess the frequency of NOMs/DRPs among KRT patients and identify contributing factors.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain), involving 117 outpatient adults with KRT. Data were collected from February 2021 to July 2023 using electronic records, semi-structured interviews (Dáder Method), and discussions with nephrology specialists. NOMs/DRPs were identified following treatment guidelines. Binary logistic regression was used to determine associated factors (p-value < 0.05).
RESULTS: Across 117 patients, 2436 NOMs and 3303 DRPs were identified, averaging 20.82 NOMs and 28.23 DRPs per patient. Prevalent NOMs included untreated conditions (58.95%), quantitative ineffectiveness (35.43%), and non-quantitative safety problems (5.13%). Dominant DRPs were undertreated conditions (37.63%), wrong dose/posology/length (33.00%), risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) (16.14%), and non-adherence (6.87%). Patients with ADR, undertreated conditions, and anemia were associated with quantitative ineffectiveness. Risk of ADR and vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency correlated with non-quantitative safety problems.
CONCLUSIONS: KRT patients exhibited a substantial prevalence of NOMs/DRPs. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of these complexities for improved patient care.

BACKGROUND: Orthogeriatric patients have an increased risk for complications due to underlying comorbidities, chronic drug therapy and frequent treatment changes during hospitalization. The clinical pharmacist (CP) plays a key role in transmural communication concerning polypharmacy to improve continuity of care by the general practitioner (GP) after discharge. In this study, a pharmacist-led transmural care program, tailored to orthogeriatric patients, was evaluated to reduce drug related problems (DRPs) after discharge.
METHODS: An interventional study was performed (pre-period: 1/10/2021-31/12/2021; post-period: 1/01/2022-31/03/2022). Patients (≥ 65 years) from the orthopedic department were included. The pre-group received usual care, the post-group received the pharmacist-led transmural care program. The DRP reduction rate one month after discharge was calculated. Associated factors for the DRP reduction rate were determined in a multiple linear regression analysis. The GP acceptance rate was determined for the proposed interventions, as well as their clinical impact using the Clinical, Economic and Organizational (CLEO) tool. Readmissions one month after discharge were evaluated.
RESULTS: Overall, 127 patients were included (control n = 61, intervention n = 66). The DRP reduction rate was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The pharmacist\'s intervention was associated with an increased DRP reduction rate (+ 1.750, 95% confidence interval 1.222-2.278). In total, 141 interventions were suggested by the CP, of which 71% were accepted one month after discharge. In both periods, four patients were readmitted one month after discharge. 58% of the interventions had a clinical impact (≥ 2 C level using the CLEO-tool) according to the geriatrician and for the CP it was 45%, indicating that they had the potential to avoid patient harm.
CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist-led transmural care program significantly reduced DRPs in geriatric patients from the orthopedic department one month after discharge. The transmural communication with GPs resulted in a high acceptance rate of the proposed interventions.

UNASSIGNED: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are often seen when a patient is transitioning from one healthcare sector to another, for example, when a patient moves from the hospital to a General Practice (GP) setting. This transition creates an opportunity for information on medication changes and follow-up plans to be lost. A cross-sectoral hospital pharmacist intervention was developed and pilot-tested in a large GP clinic. The intervention included medication history, medication reconciliation, medication review, follow-up telephone calls, identification of possible DRPs and communication with the GP. It is unknown whether the intervention is transferable to other GP clinics. The aim of the study was to explore similarities and differences between GP clinics in descriptive data and intervention acceptability.
UNASSIGNED: A convergent mixed methods study design was used. The intervention was tested in four GP clinics with differing characteristics. Quantitative data on the GP clinics, patients and pharmacist activities were collected. Qualitative data on the acceptability were collected through focus group interviews with general practitioners, nurses and pharmacists. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, the intervention was found acceptable and relevant by all. There were differences between the GP clinics in terms of size, daily physician work form and their use of pharmacists for ad hoc tasks. There were similarities in patient characteristics across GP clinics. Therefore, the intervention was found equally relevant for all of the clinics. Shared employment with unique access to health records in both sectors was important in the identification and resolution of DRPs. Economy was a barrier for further implementation.
UNASSIGNED: The intervention was found acceptable and relevant by all; therefore, it was considered transferable to other GP clinics. Hospital pharmacists were perceived to be relevant healthcare professionals to be utilized in GP, in hospitals and in the cross-sectoral transition of patients.
Acceptability of a pharmacist activity for patients transitioning between hospital and general practice Why was the study done? Drug-related problems are often seen in patients transitioning across healthcare sectors. A pharmacist activity was developed and pilot-tested in a large General Practice (GP) clinic. It was unknown whether the activity was transferable to other GP clinics.The pharmacist activity included talking to the patients about their usual medication and adjustment of prescriptions accordingly. The pharmacist activity also included a review of their medications, a follow-up telephone call to the patients and communication with the GP in case of drug-related problems.The aim of the study was to test the activity in different GP clinics and to explore similarities and differences in descriptive data and acceptability. What did the researchers do? The activity was tested in four GP clinics within the same geographical area for three months.Descriptive data about the GP clinics, the patients and the pharmacist’s activities performed were collected.Data about acceptability of the activity was collected through focus group interviews with general practitioners, nurses and hospital pharmacists.This qualitative data was combined with descriptive data to explore similarities and differences between GP clinics. What did the researchers find? Overall, the activity was found to be acceptable and relevant by all.There were differences between the GP clinics in terms of size, daily physician work form and their use of the pharmacist for ad hoc tasks.There were similarities in patients across GP clinics e.g. in terms of the number of medications or drug-related problems. The activity was found equally relevant for every clinic.Shared employment with access to health records in both sectors was important in the identification and resolution of drug-related problems. The pharmacist had the possibility to bring issues back and forth between the hospital and the GP clinic.Economy was a barrier for further implementation. What do the findings mean? The activity was found acceptable and relevant by all; therefore, it was considered transferable to other GP clinics.Hospital pharmacists were perceived to be relevant healthcare professionals to be utilised in GP, in hospitals and in the cross-sectoral transition of patients.