Drug-related problems

与药物有关的问题
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药物相关问题(DRP)是从医院到家庭过渡期间的关键医疗问题,患病率很高。已研究了各种干预策略作为过渡护理的一部分的应用,以预防DRP。然而,它仍然是具有挑战性的尽量减少患者的DRPs,尤其是老年人和出院后用药差异风险高的人群。在这篇叙述性评论中,我们证明了年龄,特定的药物和多重用药,以及一些与患者相关和系统相关的因素都有助于过渡DPRs的患病率较高,其中大多数可以通过加强护士主导的多学科药物和解在很大程度上预防。护士在过渡时期对预防DRP的贡献包括信息收集和评估,沟通与教育,提高药物依从性,以及医疗保健专业人员之间的协调。我们的结论是,在高风险过渡期,可以实施护士主导的药物管理策略来预防或解决DRP,并随后提高患者满意度和健康相关结果,防止医疗支出和资源的不必要损失和浪费,并提高过渡期护理期间多学科团队合作的效率。
    Drug-related problems (DRPs) are critical medical issues during transition from hospital to home with high prevalence. The application of a variety of interventional strategies as part of the transitional care has been studied for preventing DRPs. However, it remains challenging for minimizing DRPs in patients, especially in older adults and those with high risk of medication discrepancies after hospital discharge. In this narrative review, we demonstrated that age, specific medications and polypharmacy, as well as some patient-related and system-related factors all contribute to a higher prevalence of transitional DPRs, most of which could be largely prevented by enhancing nurse-led multidisciplinary medication reconciliation. Nurses\' contributions during transitional period for preventing DRPs include information collection and evaluation, communication and education, enhancement of medication adherence, as well as coordination among healthcare professionals. We concluded that nurse-led strategies for medication management can be implemented to prevent or solve DRPs during the high-risk transitional period, and subsequently improve patients\' satisfaction and health-related outcomes, prevent the unnecessary loss and waste of medical expenditure and resources, and increase the efficiency of the multidisciplinary teamwork during transitional care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者由于广泛的合并症和药代动力学变化而处于药物相关问题(DRPs)的高风险中。本研究旨在确定住院CKD患者的DRPs和可能的影响因素。并评价临床药师服务在浙江省某大型综合医院DRPs检测和干预中的效果,中国东部。
    方法:经伦理委员会批准,这项前瞻性研究纳入了2020年1月至12月期间入住肾脏病病房的CKD患者.临床药师在住院期间对DRPs进行鉴定和干预。DRP使用欧洲药学监护网络(PCNE)DRP分类系统进行分类,所有数据均使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)26.0版进行统计分析。
    结果:共纳入914例CKD患者,在420名(45.95%)参与者中观察到463名DRP;每名患者的平均DRP为0.51(标准偏差[SD],0.60)在药师干预前。治疗安全问题占比最高(43.84%),其次是治疗效果,占43.20%。药物选择是DRPs最常见的原因(60.26%),抗生素和心血管药物是与DRP相关的最常见药物(32.84%和28.66%,分别)。共有85.53%的药学干预建议得到遵循,84.23%的DRPs经临床药师干预后完全缓解。经历DRPs的患者比例下降到7.77%,药剂师干预后住院期间的平均DRPs为0.08(SD0.28)。DRP的重要影响因素是CKD4期,共病的数量,处方药的数量,单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型中的住院天数。
    结论:DRPs在中国CKD住院患者中很常见。CKD阶段4,合并症的数量,使用多种处方药,住院时间延长是DRP的影响因素.即使是肾病病房里只有一名临床肾病药师,在这项中国单中心研究中,临床药师在促进CKD患者DRPs的识别和协助医师解决DRPs方面发挥了重要作用.
    Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) because of extensive comorbidities and pharmacokinetic changes. This study aimed to identify DRPs and possible contributing factors in hospitalized patients with CKD, and evaluate the efficacy of the clinical pharmacist services in detection and intervention of DRPs in a large general hospital in Zhejiang Province, eastern China.
    With the approval of the Ethics Committee, patients with CKD admitted to the nephrology ward from January to December 2020 were enrolled in this prospective study. The clinical pharmacist identified and intervened the DRPs during hospitalization. The DRPs were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) DRP classification system, and all data were statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26.0.
    A total of 914 patients with CKD were included, with 463 DRPs observed among 420 (45.95%) participants; the average DRP per patient was 0.51 (standard deviation [SD], 0.60) before pharmacist intervention. Treatment safety accounted for the highest proportion of problems (43.84%), followed by treatment efficacy, accounting for 43.20%. Drug selection was the most common cause of DRPs (60.26%), and antibiotics and cardiovascular agents were the most common drugs associated with DRPs (32.84% and 28.66%, respectively). A total of 85.53% of pharmaceutical intervention recommendations were followed, and 84.23% of DRPs were completely resolved after intervention by the clinical pharmacist. The proportion of patients who experienced DRPs decreased to 7.77%, with an average of 0.08 (SD 0.28) DRPs during hospitalization after pharmacist\'s intervention. Significant contributing factors for DRPs were CKD stage 4, number of comorbid diseases, number of prescribed medications, and hospitalization days in both the univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
    DRPs are common among hospitalized patients with CKD in China. CKD stage 4, the number of comorbidities, use of multiple prescription drugs, and extended length of hospital stay are contributing factors for DRPs. Even only one clinical nephrology pharmacist in the nephrology ward, clinical pharmacist can play an important role in facilitating the identification of DRPs in patients with CKD and assisting physicians resolve DRPs in this single center study in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:术前慢性用药管理不足会使围手术期患者面临风险,并导致不必要的手术延误。本研究旨在调查住院围手术期患者慢性药物治疗问题(CMTPs)的患病率,并评估药师干预措施的相关性。
    方法:我们于2018年11月至2019年4月对住院成年患者进行了一项由药剂师主导的术前慢性用药管理的回顾性研究。对记录的药物相关问题(DRP)进行回顾性审查,并根据欧洲药学监护网络V9.1分类进行分类,并使用多项回归模型进行分析以识别风险因素。
    结果:共记录了254个DRPs,每个患者平均0.52个DRPs。治疗安全性(66.9%)是最常见的DRP。围手术期DRPs和非围手术期DRPs最常见的原因是药物选择(72.9%)和患者相关(50.8%)。分别。在292项记录在案的干预措施中,71.6%被临床医师和患者完全接受。记录的大多数问题(68.9%)已完全解决。合并症数量(OR=3.815)和长期用药数量(OR=1.539)是DRPs发生的危险因素。
    结论:这项研究的结果表明,以药剂师为主导的外科病房慢性药物治疗管理可能是一种有效的方法,有助于降低与药物相关的手术风险,优化用于慢性疾病长期治疗的药物治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Inadequate preoperative management of chronic medications can place perioperative patients at risk and cause unnecessary delays in surgical procedures. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of chronic medication therapy problems (CMTPs) in hospitalized perioperative patients and assess the relevance of pharmacists\' interventions.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of pharmacist-led preoperative management of chronic medications in hospitalized adult patients from November 2018 to April 2019. The recorded drug-related problems (DRPs) were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification V9.1 and were analyzed with a multinomial regression model to identify risk factors.
    RESULTS: A total of 254 DRPs were recorded, with an average of 0.52 DRPs per patient. Treatment safety (66.9%) was the most common DRP. The most frequent causes of perioperative DRPs and nonperioperative DRPs were drug selection (72.9%) and patient related (50.8%), respectively. Of the 292 documented interventions, 71.6% were fully accepted by the clinicians and patients. The majority (68.9%) of the recorded problems were completely resolved. The number of comorbidities (OR = 3.815) and the number of chronic medications taken (OR = 1.539) were risk factors for the occurrence of DRPs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that pharmacist-led chronic medication therapy management in surgical wards may be an effective method to help reduce medication-related surgical risks and optimize the medication therapies used for the long-term treatment of chronic diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着世界范围内减肥手术的迅速增加,这一领域的药物相关问题(DRP)似乎正在上升。本研究旨在探讨减重手术患者DRPs的发生率和特点。
    回顾性分析了2019年1月至2020年12月在我们中心接受减肥手术患者的用药记录。我们使用欧洲药品护理网络分类(PCNE9.0版)对DRP进行了分类和分析。这些DRP的严重程度是基于国家药物错误报告和预防协调委员会(NCCMERP)分类。连续变量用学生t检验分析,和分类变量使用卡方检验进行比较。使用单因素方差分析比较DRPs的数量。
    共347例患者进行了回顾,共识别出760个DRP,每个患者平均为2.19±1.36个DRP.最常见的DRP是与围手术期抗生素相关的问题,占29.47%,25.62%和14.34%的肝保护和质子泵抑制剂(PPI),分别。DRP的主要原因是不适当的抗生素药物,肝脏保护,辅助药物和PPI。89.34%的DRP被评为严重程度B-D(这意味着可能发生的潜在不良反应),而10.66%被评为E-H类DRP与老年人之间存在关系(32.22±9.29vs.29.11±6.53年),伴随手术较少(1.89±1.25vs.2.99±1.31),术后禁食时间(PFT)更长(1.18±0.55vs.1.06±0.24天)和更多合并症(6.71±2.63vs.5.23±1.46)(P<0.05)。
    减重手术围手术期DRP的发生率很高。伴随手术较少和PFT较长的患者容易发生DRP。临床药师有必要参与药物监测和审查,以促进减重手术后的康复。
    With the rapid increase of bariatric surgery worldwide, drug-related problems (DRPs) in this area seem to be rising. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of DRPs in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
    Medication records for patients who underwent bariatric surgery were analysed retrospectively between January 2019 and December 2020 in our center. We classified and analysed DRPs using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification (PCNE version 9.0). Rating severity of these DRPs was based on the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) classification. Continuous variables were analysed by Student\'s t-test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the numbers of DRPs.
    Totally 347 patients were reviewed, and 760 DRPs were identified with an average of 2.19 ± 1.36 DRPs for each patient. The most common DRPs were problems related to perioperative antibiotics accounting for 29.47%, 25.62% and 14.34% for hepatoprotection and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), respectively. The leading causes of DRPs were inappropriate medications for antibiotics, hepatoprotection, ancillary drugs and PPI. 89.34% of the DRPs were rated at severity categories B-D (which means potential adverse reactions that may occur), whereas 10.66% were rated as categories E-H. There were relations between DRPs and older (32.22 ± 9.29 vs. 29.11 ± 6.53 years), fewer concomitant surgeries (1.89 ± 1.25 vs. 2.99 ± 1.31), longer postoperative fasting time (PFT) (1.18 ± 0.55 vs. 1.06 ± 0.24 days) and more comorbidities (6.71 ± 2.63 vs. 5.23 ± 1.46) (P < 0.05).
    The incidence of DRPs in the perioperative period of bariatric surgery is high. Patients with fewer concomitant surgeries and longer PFT are prone to DRPs. It is necessary for clinical pharmacists to participate in medication monitoring and reviewing to facilitate enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药物相关问题(DRP)是指涉及药物治疗的事件或情况,实际上或可能干扰预期的健康结果。对于在初级卫生保健机构管理的患有慢性病的儿童,DRP可能会很严重,但相关研究很少。目的:在这项横断面研究中,我们的目的是探索患病率,类型,原因,中国某基层医疗机构慢性病患儿DRPs及其影响因素分析.方法:我们招募了2021年7月1日至10月12日在基层医疗机构儿科门诊就诊的慢性病儿童。临床药师通过药物治疗综述确定DRP,对DRP的类型和原因进行分类,并区分了影响结局的明显DRPs和影响结局的潜在DRPs。结果:共纳入188例慢性病患儿,在89.89%的参与者中发现了584个DRP.最常见的DRP类型是“治疗有效性”(药物治疗效果的明显问题或潜在问题;83.56%),其中67.29%是潜在的DRPs。第二种常见类型是“治疗安全性”(患者患有或可能患有不良药物事件;14.21%),其中89.16%为潜在DRPs。DRP的最常见原因与使用过程有关(42.24%),例如“患者使用/服用的药物少于处方或根本不服用药物,\“\”患者不适当地储存药物,\"和\"患者以错误的方式施用/使用药物。“第二个常见原因与分配过程有关(29.83%),例如\"未提供必要信息或提供不正确的建议\"和\"处方药不可用。“第三个常见原因与处方过程有关(26.21%),如“药物剂量太低”和“尽管存在适应症,但没有或不完全药物治疗。联合用药的数量是DRPs发生频率的影响因素(p<0.05)。结论:这项横断面研究表明,在基层医疗机构管理的慢性病儿童中,DRPs的现状很严重。DRPs的类型主要与治疗效果有关,药物的不当使用是DRP的主要原因之一。联合用药数量是DRPs发生频率的影响因素。在未来,药师应根据DRPs的特点,考虑制定针对这一特定人群的药物干预策略.
    Introduction: Drug-related problems (DRPs) refer to events or circumstances involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interfere with desired health outcomes. DRPs might be severe for children with chronic diseases managed at primary health care institutions, but the relevant research is scarce. Objective: In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to explore the prevalence, types, causes, and influencing factors of DRPs in children with chronic diseases in a Chinese primary health care institution. Methods: We recruited children with chronic diseases who visited the pediatric outpatient department in a primary health care institution from July 1 to 12 October 2021. Clinical pharmacists identified DRPs through medication therapy reviews, classified the types and causes of DRPs, and distinguished the manifested DRPs that affected the outcome and potential DRPs that were going to affect the outcome. Results: A total of 188 children with chronic diseases was included, and 584 DRPs were identified in 89.89% of participants. The most common type of DRPs was \"treatment effectiveness\" (a manifested problem or potential problem with the effect of the pharmacotherapy; 83.56%), of which 67.29% were potential DRPs. The second common type was \"treatment safety\" (patient suffers or could suffer from an adverse drug event; 14.21%), of which 89.16% were potential DRPs. The most common cause of DRPs was related to the process of use (42.24%), such as \"patient uses/takes less drug than prescribed or does not take the drug at all,\" \"patient stores drug inappropriately,\" and \"patient administers/uses the drug in a wrong way.\" The second common cause was related to the process of dispensing (29.83%), such as \"necessary information not provided or incorrect advice provided\" and \"prescribed drug is not available.\" The third common cause was related to the process of prescribing (26.21%), such as \"drug dose is too low\" and \"no or incomplete drug treatment despite an existing indication.\" The number of combined medications was an influencing factor for the frequency of DRPs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This cross-sectional study showed that the current situation regarding DRPs among children with chronic diseases managed in the primary health care institution was serious. The types of DRPs were mainly related to treatment effectiveness, and improper usage of medications was one of the main causes of DRPs. The number of combined drugs was the influencing factor for the frequency of DRPs. In the future, pharmacists should consider formulating pharmaceutical intervention strategies for this specific group according to the characteristics of DRPs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:老年门诊患者多药治疗具有潜在的不适当药物(PIM)使用的高风险。目的确定在三级医院(THs)和社区卫生中心(CHC)就诊的老年门诊患者中PIMs和药物相关问题(DRP)的患病率和模式的差异,并分析相关因素。方法于2018年9月至2019年11月在北京进行了5个THs和5个CHC的前瞻性横断面研究。中国。数据收集自年龄≥65岁的慢性病和多药房门诊患者。使用2015年和2019年啤酒标准和老年人处方筛查工具(STOPP)标准对PIM进行评估。使用辅助链DRP分类对DRP进行分类。比较了PIMs和DRP的患病率和类型,并对相关因素进行了分析。结果根据2015年Beers标准,THS患者的PIMs患病率较高,而基于2019年啤酒标准的PIM没有显示出显著差异。根据STOPP标准和DRPs,CHCs患者的PIM患病率较高。根据2015年Beers标准(OR0.774,95%CI0.604-0.992)和STOPP标准(OR2.427,95%CI1.883-3.128),拜访CHC是PIMs的独立因素,和DRP(OR3.612,95%CI2.682-4.865)。结论PIM和DRP的差异可能是由于患者和设置。应采取具体措施改善两种情况下药物的适当性。
    Background Geriatric outpatients with polypharmacy have a high risk of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use. Aim To identify differences in both prevalence and patterns of PIMs and drug-related problems (DRPs) in older outpatients who visited the tertiary hospitals (THs) and community health centers (CHCs) and analyze associated factors. Method A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in five THs and five CHCs from September 2018 to November 2019 in Beijing, China. Data were collected from outpatients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic diseases and polypharmacy. PIMs were evaluated using the 2015 and 2019 Beers Criteria and the Screening Tool of Older Persons\' Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. DRPs were classified using the Helper-Strand DRP Classification. The prevalence and types of PIMs and DRPs were compared, and relevant factors were analyzed. Results The prevalence of PIMs based on the 2015 Beers Criteria was higher in patients from the THs, while PIMs based on the 2019 Beers Criteria did not show a significant difference. PIM prevalence based on STOPP Criteria and DRPs was higher in patients from CHCs. Visiting CHCs was an independent factor of PIMs based on the 2015 Beers Criteria (OR 0.774, 95% CI 0.604-0.992) and the STOPP Criteria (OR 2.427, 95% CI 1.883-3.128), and DRPs (OR 3.612, 95% CI 2.682-4.865). Conclusion Differences in PIM and DRP might be due to the patients and settings. Specific measures to improve the appropriateness of medications in both settings should be used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定协作式药学服务(CPCS)对药物安全的影响,并确定CPCS对帕金森病(PD)患者报告结果的影响。方法:最初,在2017年3月至2019年3月期间接受CPCS的PD门诊患者与接受标准护理的PD患者进行比较,以确定管理差异。对药剂师干预数据进行编码,并将接受CPCS的PD患者与接受标准护理的患者进行比较,以确定处方药物和与之相关的剂量的差异。在此之后,使用问卷收集基线和3个月随访时接受CCS的患者的数据,问卷由两项患者报告结局[依从性和生活质量(QoL)]的验证指标组成.计算了连续变量的平均分数,对由频率计数和百分比组成的分类变量进行描述性分析。使用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验调查CCS前后依从性评分的变化,Spearman相关性分析用于将CCS前后的QoL变化与干预次数相关联,P<0.05表示差异具有统计学意义。结果:331例PD门诊患者在490次门诊患者中接受了CPCS,平均年龄为71.83(±12.54)。五百四十五个与药物有关的问题被记录为药剂师干预措施,其中最多涉及剂量变化(n=226,41.47%),药物不良反应(n=135,24.77%),和药物变化(n=102,18.72%)。与接受标准护理的人相比,接受CPCS的患者服用普拉克索的可能性显著降低(18.52对23.77%,p<0.001),并且更有可能服用金刚烷胺(5.40%对3.70%,p=0.02)和司来吉兰(17.36对11.64%,p<0.001)。较低剂量的左旋多巴/苄丝肼(0.51±0.31g对0.84±0.37g,p<0.001),左旋多巴/卡比多巴(0.33±0.23g对0.66±0.47g,p<0.001),普拉克索(1.14±1.63mg与1.27±0.69mg,p=0.01),和恩他卡朋(130.00±79.76mg与173.09±97.86mg,p<0.001)也被记录。在基线时,招募了119名平均年龄为69.98(±9.90)的PD门诊患者进行纵向研究。在3个月的随访中,参与者报告身体疼痛子量表有所改善(基线与3个月随访相比,30.04±22.21对23.01±20.98,p=0.037)和药物依从性(6.19±1.50对6.72±1.73,p=0.014)。CPCS使用频率与日常生活活动量表相关(p=0.047),身体疼痛量表(p=0.026),和药物依从性(p=0.011)。PDQ-39的总分与患者教育有关(p=0.005),用法和剂量与患者教育有关(p=0.006),而药物依从性评分与用法和剂量相关(p=0.005)。结论:CPCS有效解决了药物相关问题,改善了患者的用药方案,药物依从性,和QoL通过患者教育和剂量调整。这是中国PD患者药学服务开发和可行性测试的第一步。
    Objective: To identify the impact of a collaborative pharmaceutical care service (CPCS) on medication safety and establish the impact of the CPCS on patient reported outcomes for Parkinson\'s disease (PD) patients. Methods: Initially, PD outpatients receiving the CPCS between March 2017 and March 2019 were compared with PD patients receiving standard of care to identify differences in management. Pharmacist interventions data were coded and patients with PD receiving the CPCS were compared with those receiving standard of care to determine differences in medicines prescribed and dosage associated with these. Following this, data of patients receiving CPCS at baseline and 3-months follow-up were collected using a questionnaire consisting of validated measures of two patient-reported outcomes [adherence and quality of life (QoL)]. Mean scores for continuous variables were calculated, with descriptive analysis of categorical variables consisting of frequency counts and percentages. Change in adherence score before and after CPCS was investigated using a Wilcoxon sign rank sum test, spearman correlation analysis was used to correlate the changes in QoL before and after CPCS with the number of interventions, and p < 0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant. Results: A total of 331 PD outpatients received CPCS over 490 outpatient visits with an average age of 71.83 (±12.54). Five hundred and forty-five drug related problems were recorded as pharmacist interventions, of which most involved change to dosage (n = 226, 41.47%), adverse drug reactions (n = 135, 24.77%), and change in a medication (n = 102, 18.72%). Compared with those receiving standard of care, patients receiving CPCS were significantly less likely to have been prescribed pramipexole (18.52 versus 23.77%, p < 0.001) and more likely to have been prescribed amantadine (5.40 versus 3.70%, p = 0.02) and selegiline (17.36 versus 11.64%, p < 0.001). Lower dosages of levodopa/benserazide (0.51 ± 0.31 g versus 0.84 ± 0.37 g, p < 0.001), levodopa/carbidopa (0.33 ± 0.23 g versus 0.66 ± 0.47 g, p < 0.001), pramipexole (1.14 ± 1.63 mg versus 1.27 ± 0.69 mg, p = 0.01), and entacapone (130.00 ± 79.76 mg versus 173.09 ± 97.86 mg, p < 0.001) were also recorded. At baseline 119 PD outpatients with an average age of 69.98 (±9.90) were recruited for the longitudinal study. At 3-month follow-up, participants reported improvement in bodily pain subscale (baseline versus 3-months follow-up, 30.04 ± 22.21 versus 23.01 ± 20.98, p = 0.037) and medication adherence (6.19 ± 1.50 versus 6.72 ± 1.73, p = 0.014). Frequency of CPCS use was related to activity of daily living subscale (p = 0.047), the bodily pain subscale (p = 0.026), and medication adherence (p = 0.011). Total score of PDQ-39 was associated with patient education (p = 0.005) and usage and dosage combined with patient education (p = 0.006), while medication adherence score was associated with usage and dosage (p = 0.005). Conclusion: The CPCS was effective in resolving drug-related problems and in improving patients\' medication regimens, medication adherence, and QoL through patient education and dosage adjustments. This is the first step in the development and feasibility testing of pharmacy services for PD patients in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The prevalence and characteristics of drug-related problems (DRPs) and factors associated with the occurrence of DRPs in the neurology unit in China remain unknown. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, characteristics and severity ratings of DRPs and identify factors associated with the occurrence of DRPs in the neurology unit of a tertiary care and academic teaching hospital in China.
    A retrospective study of DRPs and pharmacists\' interventions for neurology patients was performed during a non-consecutive 24-month study period. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, and pharmacist\'s intervention records were collected. The characteristics and severity ratings of DRPs were categorized using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) DRP classification tool V9.00 and the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC-MERP) classification respectively.
    A total of 242 DRPs were detected for 974 admitted patients, an average of 0.25 DRPs per patient. Treatment safety was the major type of DRPs (106;43.8%) followed by treatment effectiveness (78;32.2%). The primary causes of DRPs were drug selection (124;44.1%) and dose selection (92;32.7%). Clinical pharmacists provided 525 interventions, and most interventions occurred at the prescriber level (241;45.9%). A total of 91.4% of these interventions were accepted, contributing to solving 93.0% of the identified problems. The majority of DRPs (210;86.8%) were rated at severity categories B to D (causing no patient harm). Multiple logistic regression showed that creatinine clearance, number of medications used, nasogastric feeding, diabetes, and infectious diseases were associated with more frequent DRPs (p < 0.05).
    DRPs are relatively common in the neurology unit in China, with primary causes of drug and dose selection, and clinical pharmacists can effectively reduce and prevent DRPs to optimize medication therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of the Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Management (PPCM) practice model in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in post-PCI patients. The study enrolled patients who underwent PCI at our hospital from May 1, 2018, to January 31, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: the PPCM group if they utilized the Complex Coronary Interventions Medication Therapy Management (CCI-MTM) clinic and the usual care (UC) group if they used the physician-only cardiology clinic. Patients had clinic visits monthly, and data were analyzed after 6-months of follow-up. A propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to control confounding bias between groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 727 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 67 patients in the PPCM group and 660 patients in the UC group. Using the 1:2 nearest neighbor matching method, 61 pairs were successfully matched; this included 61 patients in the PPCM group and 122 patients in the UC group. The proportion of patients reaching both LDL-C (73.8% versus 41.0%, P < 0.001) and heart rate (14.8% versus 4.1%, P = 0.007) goals in the PPCM was higher compared to the UC group. The median time to achieving the goal LDL-C was shorter in the PPCM group (31 days versus 126 days, P = 0.001). The utilization rates of [Formula: see text]-receptor blockers (73.8% versus 56.6%, P = 0.005) and ACEIs or ARBs (72.1% versus 56.6%, P = 0.018) were higher in the PPCM group compared to the UC group. There was no significant difference in adverse drug events between the two groups (P > 0.05). All recommendations to resolve drug-related problems were accepted by the physicians and patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The pharmaceutical care provided by the pharmacist in the PPCM clinic improved risk factor control and increased the utilization of preventive drugs in post-PCI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Introduction: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are not only detrimental to patients\' physical health and quality of life but also lead to a serious waste of health care resources. The condition of DRPs might be more severe for patients in primary health care institutions. Objective: This systematic review aims to comprehensively review the characteristics of DRPs for patients in primary health care institutions, which might help find effective strategies to identify, prevent, and intervene with DRPs in the future. Methods: We searched three English databases (Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PubMed) and four Chinese databases (CNKI, CBM, VIP, and Wanfang). Two of the researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction. Qualitative and quantitative methods were combined to analyze the data. Results: From the 3,368 articles screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The median (inter-quartile range, IQR) of the incidences of DRPs was 70.04% (59%), and the median (IQR) of the average number of DRPs per patient was 3.4 (2.8). The most common type of DRPs was \"treatment safety.\" The causes of DRPs were mainly in the prescribing section, including \"drug selection\" and \"dose selection\", while patients\' poor adherence in the use section was also an important cause of DRPs. Risk factors such as the number of medicines, age, and disease condition were positively associated with the occurrence of DRPs. In addition, the medians (IQR) of the rate of accepted interventions, implemented interventions, and solved DRPs were 78.8% (22.3%), 64.15% (16.85%), and 76.99% (26.09%), respectively. Conclusion: This systematic review showed that the condition of DRPs in primary health care institutions was serious. In pharmaceutical practice, the patients with risk factors of DRPs should be monitored more closely. Pharmacists could play important roles in the identification and intervention of DRPs, and more effective intervention strategies need to be established in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号