BACKGROUND: Infections due to Citrobacter species are increasingly observed in hospitalized patients and are often multidrug-resistant. Yet, the magnitude and burden of Citrobacter spp. resistance in the hospital setting have not been reported. We aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of Citrobacter spp. infections among hospitalized patients, their main resistance patterns and Citrobacter spp. involvement in hospital outbreaks.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature (PROSPERO registration Jan-2023, CRD42023390084). We searched Embase, Medline and grey literature for studies on hospitalized patients diagnosed with Citrobacter spp. infections, and nosocomial outbreaks due to Citrobacter spp. published during the years 2000-2022. We included observational, interventional, surveillance studies and outbreak reports. Outcomes of interest were the frequency of Citrobacter spp. infections among hospitalized patients and 3rd generation cephalosporin and/or carbapenem resistance percentages in these infections. We used random-effects models to generate pooled outcome estimates and evaluated risk of bias and quality of reporting of outbreaks.
RESULTS: We screened 1609 deduplicated publications, assessed 148 full-texts, and included 41 studies (15 observational, 13 surveillance and 13 outbreak studies). Citrobacter spp. urinary tract- and bloodstream infections were most frequently reported, with Citrobacter freundii being the main causative species. Hospital-acquired infection occurred in 85% (838/990) of hospitalized patients with Citrobacter infection. After 2010, an increasing number of patients with Citrobacter spp. infections was reported in observational studies. Pooled frequency estimates for Citrobacter spp. infections could not be generated due to lack of data. The pooled prevalence of ESBL and carbapenemase producers among Citrobacter isolates were 22% (95%CI 4-50%, 7 studies) and 18% (95%CI 0-63%, 4 studies), respectively. An increased frequency of reported Citrobacter outbreaks was observed after 2016, with an infection/colonization ratio of 1:3 and a case-fatality ratio of 7% (6/89 patients). Common outbreak sources were sinks, toilets, contaminated food and injection material. Implemented preventive measures included environmental cleaning, isolation of positive patients and reinforcement of hand hygiene. Only seven out of 13 outbreaks (54%) were definitively controlled.
CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the clinical importance of endemic and epidemic Citrobacter spp. in healthcare settings. As an emerging, multidrug‑resistant nosocomial pathogen it requires heightened awareness and further dedicated surveillance efforts.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are particularly susceptible to infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) and are often the first to be affected by an emerging resistant pathogen. Unfortunately, their prevalence and impact on morbidity and mortality according to the type of graft is not systematically reported from high-as well as from low and middle-income countries (HIC and LMIC). Thus, epidemiology on MDRO in SOT recipients could be subjected to reporting bias. In addition, screening practices and diagnostic resources may vary between countries, as well as the availability of new drugs. In this review, we aimed to depict the burden of main Gram-negative MDRO in SOT patients across HIC and LMIC and to provide an overview of current diagnostic and therapeutic resources.

BACKGROUND: Gut colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) frequently precedes infection among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), although the dynamics of colonization are not completely understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of ICU studies which described the cumulative incidence and rates of MDRO gut acquisition.
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published from 2010 to 2023 reporting on gut acquisition of MDRO in the ICU. MDRO were defined as multidrug resistant non-Pseudomonas Gram-negative bacteria (NP-GN), Pseudomonas spp., and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). We included observational studies which obtained perianal or rectal swabs at ICU admission (within 48 h) and at one or more subsequent timepoints. Our primary outcome was the incidence rate of gut acquisition of MDRO, defined as any MDRO newly detected after ICU admission (i.e., not present at baseline) for all patient-time at risk. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023481569.
RESULTS: Of 482 studies initially identified, 14 studies with 37,305 patients met criteria for inclusion. The pooled incidence of gut acquisition of MDRO during ICU hospitalization was 5% (range: 1-43%) with a pooled incidence rate of 12.2 (95% CI 8.1-18.6) per 1000 patient-days. Median time to acquisition ranged from 4 to 26 days after ICU admission. Results were similar for NP-GN and Pseudomonas spp., with insufficient data to assess VRE. Among six studies which provided sufficient data to perform curve fitting, there was a quasi-linear increase in gut MDRO colonization of 1.41% per day which was stable through 30 days of ICU hospitalization (R2 = 0.50, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition of gut MDRO was common in the ICU and increases with days spent in ICU through 30 days of follow-up. These data may guide future interventions seeking to prevent gut acquisition of MDRO in the ICU.

Purpose: Cutaneous infection in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) can cause significant morbidity, mortality, and dangerous sequelae. This review article aims to delve into the known epidemiology of EB, highlight the disease\'s primary causative agents and their antimicrobial resistance spectrum.Materials and methods: A thorough literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, JBI and PubMed to gather data on the microbial landscape of EB wounds. The focus was on identifying the most common bacteria associated with EB infections and assessing their antimicrobial resistance profiles.Results: The analysis revealed that Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequently identified bacterium in EB wounds, with a notable prevalence of methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA). Specific studies on mupirocin resistance further indicated rising rates of mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, with one study reporting rates as high as 16.07%. Additionally, high resistance to other antibiotics, such as levofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, was observed in MRSA isolates.Conclusions: The findings highlight the critical need for regular resistance surveillance and the prudent use of mupirocin to manage infections effectively in EB. The multi-drug resistant nature of pathogens in EB presents a significant challenge in treatment, highlighting the importance of antimicrobial stewardship. Ultimately, given the sparse literature and the rarity of large-scale studies, further longitudinal research on the antimicrobial resistance profile of bacteria isolated from EB wounds is essential.

The increase of multiple drug resistance bacteria significantly diminishes the effectiveness of antibiotic armory and subsequently exaggerates the level of therapeutic failure. Phytoconstituents are exceptional substitutes for resistance-modifying vehicles. The plants appear to be a deep well for the discovery of novel antibacterial compounds. This is owing to the numerous enticing characteristics of plants, they are easily accessible and inexpensive, extracts or chemicals derived from plants typically have significant levels of action against infections, and they rarely cause serious adverse effects. The enormous selection of phytochemicals offers very distinct chemical structures that may provide both novel mechanisms of antimicrobial activity and deliver us with different targets in the interior of the bacterial cell. They can directly affect bacteria or act together with the crucial events of pathogenicity, in this manner decreasing the aptitude of bacteria to create resistance. Abundant phytoconstituents demonstrate various mechanisms of action toward multi drug resistance bacteria. Overall, this comprehensive review will provide insights into the potential of phytoconstituents as alternative treatments for bacterial infections, particularly those caused by multi drug resistance strains. By examining the current state of research in this area, the review will shed light on potential future directions for the development of new antimicrobial therapies.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a significant threat to the global healthcare system, presenting a major challenge to antimicrobial stewardship worldwide. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date picture of global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of AMR and antibiotic usage among COVID-19 patients receiving treatment in healthcare facilities. Our search encompassed the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases, spanning studies published from December 2019 to May 2023. We utilized random-effects meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients, aligning with both the WHO\'s priority list of MDROs and the AWaRe list of antibiotic products. Estimates were stratified by region, country, and country income. Meta-regression models were established to identify predictors of MDRO prevalence and antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42023449396).
RESULTS: Among the 11,050 studies screened, 173 were included in the review, encompassing a total of 892,312 COVID-19 patients. MDROs were observed in 42.9% (95% CI 31.1-54.5%, I2 = 99.90%) of COVID-19 patients: 41.0% (95% CI 35.5-46.6%) for carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO), 19.9% (95% CI 13.4-27.2%) for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 24.9% (95% CI 16.7-34.1%) for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms (ESBL), and 22.9% (95% CI 13.0-34.5%) for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE), respectively. Overall, 76.2% (95% CI 69.5-82.9%, I2 = 99.99%) of COVID-19 patients were treated with antibiotics: 29.6% (95% CI 26.0-33.4%) with \"Watch\" antibiotics, 22.4% (95% CI 18.0-26.7%) with \"Reserve\" antibiotics, and 16.5% (95% CI 13.3-19.7%) with \"Access\" antibiotics. The MDRO prevalence and antibiotic use were significantly higher in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries, with the lowest proportion of antibiotic use (60.1% (95% CI 52.1-68.0%)) and MDRO prevalence (29.1% (95% CI 21.8-36.4%)) in North America, the highest MDRO prevalence in the Middle East and North Africa (63.9% (95% CI 46.6-81.2%)), and the highest proportion of antibiotic use in South Asia (92.7% (95% CI 90.4-95.0%)). The meta-regression identified antibiotic use and ICU admission as a significant predictor of higher prevalence of MDROs in COVID-19 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review offers a comprehensive and current assessment of MDRO prevalence and antibiotic use among COVID-19 patients in healthcare facilities. It underscores the formidable challenge facing global efforts to prevent and control AMR amidst the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings serve as a crucial warning to policymakers, highlighting the urgent need to enhance antimicrobial stewardship strategies to mitigate the risks associated with future pandemics.

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi have emerged in Pakistan and Iraq. We report 13 children with enteric fever in Southeast Texas seen over 3.5 years, of whom 23.1% had XDR isolates.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections pose challenges for clinical treatment and cause high mortality, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs).
OBJECTIVE: To systematically summarize and analyse the risk factors for MDR/XDR A. baumannii-infected patients admitted to ICUs.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible original studies published in English before October 2023. Meta-analysis was conducted where appropriate, with mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) calculated for continuous and nominal scaled data. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
RESULTS: Ten studies reporting 1199 ICU patients (604 from general ICUs, 435 from neonatal ICUs, and 160 from paediatric ICUs) from eight countries were included in our analysis. Risk factors associated with MDR A. baumannii infection among patients admitted to general ICUs included high Acute Physiology And Clinical Health II (APACHE Ⅱ) score (mean difference (MD): 7.52; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.24-11.80; P = 0.0006), invasive procedures (odds ratio (OR): 3.47; 95% CI: 1.70-7.10; P = 0.0006), longer ICU stay (MD: 3.40; 95% CI: 2.94-3.86; P < 0.00001), and use of antibiotics (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.22-5.94; P = 0.01). In the sub-group analysis, longer neonatal ICU stay (MD: 16.88; 95% CI: 9.79-23.97; P < 0.00001) was associated with XDR A. baumannii infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Close attention should be paid to patients with longer ICU stays, undergoing invasive procedures, using antibiotics, and with high APACHE Ⅱ scores to reduce the risk of MDR and XDR A. baumannii infections.

UNASSIGNED: The escalating threat of multidrug-resistant organisms necessitates constant exploration for novel antimicrobial agents. Eravacycline has emerged as a promising solution due to its unique chemical structure, which enhances potency and expands its spectrum of activity.
UNASSIGNED: This review provides a thorough examination of eravacycline, encompassing its in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, carbapenem-non-susceptible organisms, anaerobes, and other bacterial strains. Additionally, it evaluates evidence from clinical studies to establish its clinical effect and safety.
UNASSIGNED: Eravacycline, a synthetic fluorocycline, belongs to the tetracyclines class. Similar to other tetracycline, eravacycline exerts its antibacterial action by reversibly binding to the bacterial ribosomal 30S subunit. Eravacycline demonstrates potent in vitro activity against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, anaerobes, and multidrug-resistant organisms. Randomized controlled trials and its associated meta-analysis affirm eravacycline\'s efficacy in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections. Moreover, real-world studies showcase eravacycline\'s adaptability and effectiveness in diverse clinical conditions, emphasizing its utility beyond labeled indications. Despite common gastrointestinal adverse events, eravacycline maintains an overall favorable safety profile, reinforcing its status as a tolerable antibiotic. However, ongoing research is essential for refining eravacycline\'s role, exploring combination therapy, and assessing its performance against biofilms, in combating challenging bacterial infections.

The current standard of stethoscope hygiene doesn\'t eliminate the transmission of harmful pathogens, including multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). In the era of the increasing prevalence of MDRO infections, the use of new systems providing touch free barriers may improve patient safety versus traditional stethoscope cleaning practices with chemical agents. Our purpose was to provide a narrative literature review regarding barriers as an improvement over the current standard of care for stethoscope hygiene. Searching PubMed, articles were identified if they were in English and published after 1990, using the search term \"stethoscope barrier\", or if they were from a previously published stethoscope hygiene article using \"author\'s name + stethoscope\". Included articles evaluated or discussed stethoscope barriers. Of 28 manuscripts identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria. Barriers were considered superior to alternatives if they were single use, disposable, applied in a touch free fashion, were impervious to pathogens, provided an aseptic patient contact, and were acoustically invisible. Use of a practitioner\'s personal stethoscope with a disposable diaphragm barrier should be recommended as a new standard of care as this represents an improvement in patient safety and patient experience when compared to the disposable stethoscope or isopropyl alcohol stethoscope diaphragm cleaning.