Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial

耐药性, 多种, 细菌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,新的抗菌药物已经被引入治疗学,包括新的β-内酰胺-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合和头孢地洛,以应对耐药性增加的治疗需求。对于这些微生物引起的感染也有不同的治疗指南,这些治疗指南已经得到了不同的专业协会的批准,包括欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID),美国传染病学会(IDSA)和西班牙传染病与临床微生物学学会(SEIMC)。所有这些都是基于科学证据,但专家意见在他们的建议中的权重存在差异。ESCMID和IDSA均包括治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶微生物的建议。IDSA是唯一包括AmpC生产商在内的公司,所有这些都针对耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌和鲍曼不动杆菌以及多重耐药或难以治疗的铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染的治疗,IDSA和SEIMC包括对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌治疗的建议。未来的指南应整合当前指南未涵盖的新的抗菌药物和新的创新管理方案。
    In recent years, new antimicrobials have been introduced in therapeutics, including new beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in response to therapeutic needs in the face of increasing resistance. There are also different treatment guidelines for infections caused by these microorganisms that have been approved by different professional societies, including those of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC). All of them are based on scientific evidence, but with differences in the weight of expert opinion in their recommendations. Both ESCMID and IDSA include recommendations for the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing microorganisms. The IDSA is the only one including AmpC producers, all address the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii and multidrug-resistant or difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the IDSA and SEIMC include recommendations on the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Future guidelines should integrate new antimicrobials and new innovative management options not covered by current guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    方法:本指南的目的是为作为多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌(MDR-GNB)携带者的成年住院患者在手术前的围手术期抗生素预防(PAP)提供建议。
    方法:这些循证指南是在对针对以下MDR-GNB的PAP的已发表研究进行系统评价后制定的:耐头孢菌素的超广谱肠杆菌(ESCR-E),耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE),耐氨基糖苷类肠杆菌,氟喹诺酮耐药肠杆菌(FQR-E),耐复方新诺明嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌,耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB),极度耐药的铜绿假单胞菌,抗粘菌素GNB,和泛耐药GNB。关键结果是由任何细菌和/或定植MDR-GNB引起的手术部位感染(SSIs)的发生,和SSI归因死亡率。重要的结果包括任何类型的术后感染并发症的发生,全因死亡率,和PAP的不良事件,包括术后对靶向(基于培养物)PAP的耐药性的发展和艰难梭菌感染的发生率。所有数据库的最后一次搜索直到2022年4月30日。根据GRADE方法定义了每个建议的证据水平和强度。就最终建议清单达成了多学科专家小组的共识。抗菌药物管理考虑因素被纳入建议制定中。
    结论:指南小组审查了证据,每个细菌,在手术前使用MDR-GNB定植的患者中SSI的风险,并对现有研究进行了严格评估。发现了重大的知识差距,大多数问题都是通过观察性研究解决的。在检索到的研究中发现了中度到高度的偏倚风险,大多数建议得到了低水平证据的支持。小组有条件地建议在接受结直肠手术和实体器官移植的患者进行经直肠超声引导的前列腺活检和ESCR-E之前对FQR-E进行直肠筛查和靶向PAP。在评估当地流行病学后,建议在移植手术前筛查CRE和CRAB。在实施筛查程序或进行PAP更改之前,必须仔细考虑实验室工作量和抗菌药物管理团队的参与。提倡进行高质量的前瞻性研究,以评估PAP对进行高风险手术的CRE和CRAB携带者的影响。未来精心设计的临床试验应评估靶向PAP的有效性,包括使用EUCAST临床断点通过术后培养监测MDR-GNB定植。
    METHODS: The aim of the guidelines is to provide recommendations on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in adult inpatients who are carriers of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) before surgery.
    METHODS: These evidence-based guidelines were developed after a systematic review of published studies on PAP targeting the following MDR-GNB: extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacterales, fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales, cotrimoxazole-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The critical outcomes were the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by any bacteria and/or by the colonizing MDR-GNB, and SSI-attributable mortality. Important outcomes included the occurrence of any type of postsurgical infectious complication, all-cause mortality, and adverse events of PAP, including development of resistance to targeted (culture-based) PAP after surgery and incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections. The last search of all databases was performed until April 30, 2022. The level of evidence and strength of each recommendation were defined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached for the final list of recommendations. Antimicrobial stewardship considerations were included in the recommendation development.
    CONCLUSIONS: The guideline panel reviewed the evidence, per bacteria, of the risk of SSIs in patients colonized with MDR-GNB before surgery and critically appraised the existing studies. Significant knowledge gaps were identified, and most questions were addressed by observational studies. Moderate to high risk of bias was identified in the retrieved studies, and the majority of the recommendations were supported by low level of evidence. The panel conditionally recommends rectal screening and targeted PAP for fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and for extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in patients undergoing colorectal surgery and solid organ transplantation. Screening for CRE and CRAB is suggested before transplant surgery after assessment of the local epidemiology. Careful consideration of the laboratory workload and involvement of antimicrobial stewardship teams before implementing the screening procedures or performing changes in PAP are warranted. High-quality prospective studies to assess the impact of PAP among CRE and CRAB carriers performing high-risk surgeries are advocated. Future well-designed clinical trials should assess the effectiveness of targeted PAP, including the monitoring of MDR-GNB colonization through postoperative cultures using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing clinical breakpoints.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    铜绿假单胞菌(PA)是我国第二常见的医院获得性肺炎(HAP)革兰阴性菌(16.9%-22.0%)。PA在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中的比例约为1.0%,而在严重CAP中增加到1.8%-8.3%。有PA感染史的患者中PA占CAP的67.0%,支气管扩张,非常严重的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或气管切开术。考虑到PA引起的下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)的高疾病负担,加上近年来在这一领域的进展,中国胸科学会肺部感染大会更新了《中国成人下呼吸道铜绿假单胞菌感染管理专家共识(2014版)》,专注于病原体检测,诊断,抗菌治疗,综合管理,感染预防和控制。PA引起急性和慢性LTRI。急性LRTIs主要包括肺炎(CAP,HAP和呼吸机相关性肺炎),气管支气管炎,肺脓肿和脓胸。慢性LTRI的诊断应基于对(1)潜在的慢性结构性肺疾病的综合评估,比如支气管扩张,囊性纤维化,COPD,(2)存在LRTIs的临床表现;(3)在1年内从合格的下呼吸道标本中检测到的PA≥2次(至少间隔3个月)。当从下呼吸道标本中分离出PA时,区分感染与定植很重要。药物敏感性试验是PA耐药性检测的常规方法,是靶向治疗的基础。当药物敏感性试验显示可用药物的活性有限时,联合药敏试验建议选择体外具有累加或协同作用的抗菌药物进行联合治疗。PA分离株抗性机制的快速检测,如碳青霉烯酶表型确认试验,如果有建议。建议不要常规检测抗性基因以选择治疗剂。对于病情危重或有PA感染高危因素的急性LRTIs患者,在采集标本进行微生物学试验后,应启动涵盖PA的经验性抗菌治疗.在非危重的疑似PA肺炎患者中,应选择具有高肺脏浓度的抗PA活性的单一抗菌药物进行经验性治疗。然而,对于患有严重疾病(如败血症)或具有多药耐药(MDR)PA危险因素的患者,应使用两种不同类型的抗微生物药物的组合,这两种药物都可能敏感。抗菌方案应遵循药代动力学/药效学原则,以确保足够的剂量和给药频率。对于已确认的PALRTI,应根据药物敏感性选择抗生素。在没有重大基础疾病的患者中,建议使用具有足够肺部浓度的活性抗菌药物的单一治疗,而不是联合治疗;当所有可用的活性剂的肺内浓度都较差时,联合治疗是必须的。对于耐碳青霉烯PA(CRPA)或难以治疗的耐药性PA(DTR-PA)引起的LRTI,如果是一种新的酶抑制剂,例如头孢特洛赞/他唑巴坦,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦,亚胺培南/西司他丁/来巴坦显示体外敏感性,建议将其作为一线治疗;头孢地洛可以作为二线治疗。也可以考虑基于多粘菌素的联合疗法。耐药PALRTI的其他潜在成功方法包括延长β-内酰胺的输注时间,联合治疗和吸入抗菌治疗。在患有潜在慢性结构性肺病的患者中,抗菌方案(药物,剂量,给药途径,和治疗持续时间)应根据临床特征决定,药物敏感性,和治疗目标(控制加剧的症状,根除新兴的PA,或预防频繁恶化的患者的突然发作)。除了抗菌治疗,包括气道清除治疗(ACT)在内的综合护理,氧疗,应提供营养支持和器官功能保护。从医院感染预防和控制的角度,除了标准预防措施外,建议隔离和预防接触传输以阻止PA传输。有针对性的主动筛查,及时监测和反馈有助于MDR-PA的预防和控制。不建议全身和局部使用预防性抗菌药物。食病病上食病病患和戒病病患是经上口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口口声声口口口声声口口口口声声口口声声口声声口声声口声声口口
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is the second common Gram-negative bacterium for hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) in China (16.9%-22.0%). The proportion of PA in community acquired pneumonia (CAP) was about 1.0%, while increased to 1.8%-8.3% in severe CAP. PA accounted for 67.0% of CAP in patients with a history of PA infection, bronchiectasis, very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or tracheotomy. Considering the high disease burden of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by PA, together with the progress in this field in recent years, the Pulmonary Infection Assembly of Chinese Thoracic Society updated the \"Chinese expert consensus on the management of lower respiratory tract infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in adults (2014 version)\", focusing on pathogen detection, diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, comprehensive management, infection prevention and control.PA causes both acute and chronic LTRIs. Acute LRTIs mainly include pneumonia (CAP, HAP and ventilator-associated pneumonia), tracheobronchitis, lung abscess and empyema. The diagnosis of chronic LTRIs should be based on a comprehensive assessment of (1) underlying chronic structural lung diseases, such as bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, COPD, or immunocompromised conditions; (2) the presence of clinical manifestations of LRTIs; and (3) ≥ two times (at least 3 months apart) of PA detected from eligible lower respiratory tract specimens within 1 year. It is important to distinguish infection from colonization when PA is isolated from lower respiratory tract specimens. Drug susceptibility test is a conventional method for PA resistance detection and serves as a basis for target therapy. When drug susceptibility test shows limited activity of available agents, combined susceptibility test is suggested to select antimicrobial drugs with additive or synergistic effect in vitro for combination therapy. Rapid test of resistance mechanisms of PA isolates, such as carbapenemase phenotype confirmation tests, is recommended if available. It is recommended not to routinely detect resistance genes for choosing therapeutic agents.For patients with acute LRTIs in critical condition or with high risk factors for PA infection, empirical antimicrobial therapy covering PA should be initiated after collecting specimens for microbiological tests. In patients with suspected PA pneumonia who are not critically ill, single antimicrobial drug of anti-PA activity with high lung concentration should be selected for empirical treatment. However, for patients with a serious condition such as sepsis or with risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) PA, a combination of two different classes of antimicrobial drugs that are both potentially susceptible should be used. The antimicrobial regimen should follow pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics principles to ensure adequate dosage and administration frequency. For confirmed PA LRTIs, antibiotics should be selected based on drug sensitivity. In patients without significant underlying diseases, single therapy of an active antimicrobial with adequate pulmonary concentration is recommended rather than combination therapy; when all the available active agents have poor intrapulmonary concentrations, combination therapy is obligatory. For LRTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant PA (CRPA) or difficult-to-treat resistance PA (DTR-PA), if an agent of new enzyme inhibitor, such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam shows in vitro sensitivity, it is recommended as the first-line choice; cefiderocol may serve as the second-line treatment. Combination therapy based on polymyxins may also be considered. Other potentially successful approaches for drug-resistant PA LRTIs include extended infusion time of β-lactams, combination therapy and inhaled antimicrobial therapy.In patients with underlying chronic structural lung diseases, the antimicrobial regimen (drug, dosage, route of administration, and duration of therapy) should be decided according to clinical features, drug sensitivity, and treatment goals (control of exacerbated symptoms, eradication of new-emerging PA, or prevention of flare-ups in patients with frequent exacerbation).Along with antimicrobial therapy, comprehensive care including airway clearance therapy (ACT), oxygen therapy, nutritional support and organ function protection should be provided. From the perspective of nosocomial infection prevention and control, isolation and prophylaxis of contact transmission are recommended to block PA transmission in addition to standard prevention measures. Targeted active screening, timely monitoring and feedback can help the prevention and control of MDR-PA. The systemic and topical use of prophylactic antimicrobials is not recommended.
    铜绿假单胞菌是难治性下呼吸道感染最常见致病菌之一,由于其耐药严重和易形成生物被膜,特别是近10多年来碳青霉烯类耐药株的出现,使其治疗更为困难;同时新的治疗药物和治疗策略不断问世,有必要加以评估以指导临床合理应用。中华医学会呼吸病学分会感染学组在《铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染诊治专家共识(2014年版)》的基础上进行更新,并以临床诊治和预防的思路和技术为重点,以期为临床医生规范化诊治铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染提供切实可行的参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的主要目的是提出多药耐药革兰氏阴性菌(GN-MDRO)的通用定义,可用于流行病学监测和基准测试。
    在此回顾性数据分析中,我们使用了2017-2021年ANRESIS数据库中不同革兰氏阴性微生物的血培养分离株的解释定性易感性数据(SIR).我们首先分析了不同瑞士实验室使用的测试算法,并研究了抗生素组内的交叉耐药模式。将这些数据与现有的国际定义进行比较,我们开发了两种不同的GN-MDRO定义,用于监视目的的扩展(ANRESIS扩展)和用于临床目的的更严格的扩展,主要旨在识别难以治疗的GN-MDRO(ANRESIS限制)。使用这些新颖的算法,将我们国家数据集中确定的侵入性GN-MDRO的比率与国际和国家定义进行了比较:欧洲疾病预防和控制中心(ECDC)的定义,医院卫生和感染委员会(KRINKO)的定义和苏黎世大学医院提出的定义。
    总共41,785例肠杆菌的SIR数据,2,919,和419spp。分离株用于分析。我们的MDRO定义使用了五种抗生素:氨基糖苷类,哌拉西林他唑巴坦,第三代和第四代头孢菌素,碳青霉烯类和氟喹诺酮类。在不同实验室的测试算法之间发现了很大的差异。抗生素组中的交叉抗性分析显示,最可能对特定革兰氏阴性细菌有效的物质未被优先测试(例如,阿米卡星的氨基糖苷类)。对于所有测试的细菌物种,使用ECDC-MDR定义发现多重耐药分离株的最高比率,其次是ANRESIS扩展定义。使用ANRESIS限制性定义(n=627)鉴定的MDR-肠杆菌的数量与使用KRINKO(n=622)和UHZ定义(n=437)鉴定的数量相当。然而,根据KRINKO分类为MDR-肠杆菌的分离株,UHZ和ANRESIS限制的定义(总n=870)差异很大。根据KRINKO,只有242个分离株(27.8%)被统一分类为MDRO,UHZ和ANRESIS限制定义。对克雷伯菌属的发现相当。还有铜绿假单胞菌.
    不同MDRO定义的应用不仅导致MDRO率的显著差异,而且导致最终被分类为MDRO的分离株的显著差异。因此,如果在医院之间比较数据,定义全国性的MDRO算法至关重要。最小抗生素敏感性测试小组的定义将进一步提高可比性。
    The main objective of this study was to propose a common definition of multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms (GN-MDRO), which may be used for epidemiological surveillance and benchmarking.
    In this retrospective data analysis, we used interpreted qualitative susceptibility data (SIR) from blood culture isolates of different gram-negative microorganisms from the ANRESIS database from 2017-2021. We first analysed testing algorithms used by different Swiss laboratories and investigated cross-resistance patterns within antibiotic groups. Comparing these data with existing international definitions, we developed two different GN-MDRO definitions, an extended one for surveillance purposes (ANRESIS-extended) and a more stringent one for clinical purposes, aimed primarily at the identification of difficult-to-treat GN-MDRO (ANRESIS-restricted). Using these novel algorithms, the rates of invasive GN-MDRO identified in our national dataset were compared with international and national definitions: the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) definition, the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection (KRINKO) definition and the definition proposed by the University Hospital Zurich.
    SIR data of a total of 41,785 Enterobacterales, 2,919 , and 419 spp. isolates were used for the analyses. Five antibiotic categories were used for our MDRO definition: aminoglycosides, piperacillin-tazobactam, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. Large differences were found between the testing algorithms of the different laboratories. Cross-resistance analysis within an antibiotic group revealed that the substance most likely to be effective against a particular gram-negative bacterium was not preferentially tested (e.g. amikacin for the aminoglycosides). For all bacterial species tested, the highest rates of multidrug-resistant isolates were found using the ECDC-MDR definition, followed by the ANRESIS-extended definition. The number of MDR-Enterobacterales identified using the ANRESIS-restricted definition (n = 627) was comparable to those identified using the KRINKO (n = 622) and UHZ definitions (n = 437). However, the isolates classified as MDR-Enterobacterales according to the KRINKO, UHZ and ANRESIS-restricted definitions (total n = 870) differed considerably. Only 242 of the isolates (27.8%) were uniformly classified as MDRO according to the KRINKO, UHZ and ANRESIS-restricted definitions. Comparable findings were made for Klebsiella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    The application of different MDRO definitions leads to significant differences in not only MDRO rates but also the isolates that are eventually classified as MDRO. Therefore, defining a nationwide MDRO algorithm is crucial if data are compared between hospitals. The definition of a minimal antibiotic susceptibility testing panel would improve comparability further.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由多重耐药菌引起的感染患者的管理具有挑战性,需要多学科方法来实现成功的临床结果。本文的目的是为这些感染的诊断和最佳管理提供建议,重点是靶向抗生素治疗。该文件是由五个认可意大利协会提名的专家小组制作的,即意大利临床微生物学家协会(AMCLI),意大利抗菌药物管理小组(GISA),意大利微生物学会(SIM),意大利传染病和热带病学会(SIMIT)和意大利抗感染治疗学会(SITA)。人口,干预,关于微生物学诊断的比较和结果(PICO)问题,针对以下病原体进行了药理学策略和靶向抗生素治疗:耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌;耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌;耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌;耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌.在PICO策略的指导下,对2011年1月至2020年11月发表的文献进行了系统回顾。由于来自随机对照试验(RCT)的数据预计有限,还回顾了观察性研究。使用等级方法对证据的确定性进行分类。建议被分类为强有力的或有条件的。针对每种病原体制定了详细的建议。大多数可用的RCT都有严重的偏见风险,许多观察性研究有几个局限性,包括小样本量,回顾性设计和混杂因素的存在。因此,一些建议是基于低或极低的证据确定性。重要的是,这些建议应不断更新,以反映来自临床研究和实际经验的新证据.
    Management of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal management of these infections, with a focus on targeted antibiotic therapy. The document was produced by a panel of experts nominated by the five endorsing Italian societies, namely the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) questions about microbiological diagnosis, pharmacological strategies and targeted antibiotic therapy were addressed for the following pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2011 to November 2020 was guided by the PICO strategy. As data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were expected to be limited, observational studies were also reviewed. The certainty of evidence was classified using the GRADE approach. Recommendations were classified as strong or conditional. Detailed recommendations were formulated for each pathogen. The majority of available RCTs have serious risk of bias, and many observational studies have several limitations, including small sample size, retrospective design and presence of confounders. Thus, some recommendations are based on low or very-low certainty of evidence. Importantly, these recommendations should be continually updated to reflect emerging evidence from clinical studies and real-world experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗菌药物耐药性是全球健康的主要威胁之一。它使常见的感染变得越来越困难或不可能治疗,导致更高的医疗费用,延长住院时间和增加死亡率。多药耐药生物(MDRO)导致的感染率在全球范围内不断增加。尽管近年来新型抗生素的可获得性增加,但针对MDRO的活性剂却受到限制。本指南旨在帮助临床医生管理MDRO引起的感染。2019年台湾循证抗菌药物使用指南建议(GREAT)工作组,由来自台湾14个医疗中心的传染病专家组成,审查了目前的证据,并起草了治疗MDRO感染的建议。一个全国性的专家小组在2020年8月的一次共识会议上审查了这些建议,该指南得到了台湾传染病学会(IDST)的认可。本指南包括针对耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌引起的感染选择抗菌治疗的建议,耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌,耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌,和耐万古霉素肠球菌.该指南考虑了当地的流行病学,并包括在台湾可能尚未上市的抗菌药物。它旨在作为临床指南,而不是取代医生在管理个体患者时的临床判断。
    Antimicrobial drug resistance is one of the major threats to global health. It has made common infections increasingly difficult or impossible to treat, and leads to higher medical costs, prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality. Infection rates due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are increasing globally. Active agents against MDRO are limited despite an increased in the availability of novel antibiotics in recent years. This guideline aims to assist clinicians in the management of infections due to MDRO. The 2019 Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group, comprising of infectious disease specialists from 14 medical centers in Taiwan, reviewed current evidences and drafted recommendations for the treatment of infections due to MDRO. A nationwide expert panel reviewed the recommendations during a consensus meeting in Aug 2020, and the guideline was endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan (IDST). This guideline includes recommendations for selecting antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. The guideline takes into consideration the local epidemiology, and includes antimicrobial agents that may not yet be available in Taiwan. It is intended to serve as a clinical guide and not to supersede the clinical judgment of physicians in the management of individual patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺炎指南建议对具有特定危险因素的患者进行经验性双重抗伪粒子治疗。然而,对于何时使用双重抗伪粒子治疗缺乏共识,因为建议被认为是弱的,基于低质量的证据。
    本研究的目的是开发组合抗生素以评估铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性(P.铜绿假单胞菌)在呼吸道培养中对经验性抗生素的组合使用,并使用组合抗菌图来描述指南推荐双重抗假单胞菌治疗的特定风险因素的影响。
    对2014年9月至2018年9月铜绿假单胞菌呼吸道培养阳性的肺炎住院成人进行了回顾性队列研究。收集的数据包括人口统计,抗菌药物敏感性结果,以及指南推荐双重抗伪粒子治疗的危险因素。开发了组合抗生素图,并进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定对β-内酰胺类药物不敏感的危险因素。
    纳入了八百十九名患者,72%接受了抗生素治疗。β-内酰胺的敏感性范围为58%至69%,并且添加氟喹诺酮或氨基糖苷导致敏感性的统计学显着增加。然而,仅添加妥布霉素或阿米卡星的敏感率接近或超过90%,按肺炎类型和危险因素分层。基于指南的风险因素的存在通常会导致易感性降低。Logistic回归分析确定了与β-内酰胺类药物不敏感相关的三个危险因素:前90天静脉注射抗生素,养老院住宅,和开始时的机械通气。每个额外风险因素的累积存在影响β-内酰胺敏感率,在没有任何风险因素的情况下为93%,当所有三个风险因素共存时为39%。
    肺炎需要双重抗伪粒子治疗的危险因素应进行局部验证。当需要双重抗伪粒子治疗时,妥布霉素或阿米卡星具有提供足够的体外活性的最佳可能性。
    Guidelines for pneumonia recommend empiric dual antipseudomonal therapy in patients with specific risk factors. However, there is lack of consensus on when to use dual antipseudomonal therapy as the recommendations are rated as weak, based on low-quality evidence.
    The objectives of this study were to develop combination antibiograms to assess the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) in respiratory cultures to combinations of empiric antibiotics and to use combination antibiograms to delineate the impact of specific risk factors for which guidelines recommend dual antipseudomonal therapy.
    A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adults hospitalized with pneumonia with positive respiratory cultures for P. aeruginosa between September 2014 and September 2018. Data collected included demographics, antimicrobial susceptibility results, and risk factors for which guidelines recommend dual antipseudomonal therapy. Combination antibiograms were developed and logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for nonsusceptibility to beta-lactams.
    Eight hundred nineteen patients were included and 72% received antibiotics. Beta-lactam susceptibility ranged from 58% to 69% and addition of a fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resulted in statistically significant increases in susceptibility. However, only addition of tobramycin or amikacin provided susceptibility rates approaching or exceeding 90% stratified by pneumonia type and risk factors. Presence of guideline-based risk factors generally resulted in reduced susceptibility rates. Logistic regression identified three risk factors associated with nonsusceptibility to beta-lactams: intravenous antibiotics in the previous 90 days, nursing home residence, and mechanical ventilation at onset. The cumulative presence of each additional risk factor affected beta-lactam susceptibility rates, which were 93% in the absence of any risk factors and 39% when all three risk factors co-existed.
    Risk factors necessitating dual antipseudomonal therapy for pneumonia should be locally validated. When dual antipseudomonal therapy is indicated, tobramycin or amikacin have the best likelihood of providing adequate in vitro activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Antimicrobial resistance is an important global issue that impacts the efficacy of established antimicrobial therapy. This is true globally and within the Arab countries of the Middle East, where a range of key Gram-negative pathogens pose challenges to effective therapy. There is a need to establish effective treatment recommendations for this region given specific challenges to antimicrobial therapy, including variations in the availability of antimicrobials, infrastructure and specialist expertise. This consensus provides regional recommendations for the first-line treatment of hospitalized patients with serious infections caused by World Health Organization critical priority Gram-negative pathogens Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to carbapenems, and Enterobacteriaceae resistant to carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins. A working group comprising experts in infectious disease across the region was assembled to review contemporary literature and provide additional consensus on the treatment of key pathogens. Detailed therapeutic recommendations are formulated for these pathogens with a focus on bacteraemia, nosocomial pneumonia, urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and intra-abdominal infections. First-line treatment options are provided, along with alternative agents that may be used where variations in antimicrobial availability exist or where local preferences and resistance patterns should be considered. These recommendations take into consideration the diverse social and healthcare structures of the Arab countries of the Middle East, meeting a need that is not filled by international guidelines. There is a need for these recommendations to be updated continually to reflect changes in antimicrobial resistance in the region, as well as drug availability and emerging data from clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号