Drinking patterns

饮酒模式
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:酒精使用障碍鉴定测试(AUDIT)是全球使用最广泛的筛查工具之一。虽然它被翻译成多种语言,不存在很多针对特定国家的适应措施,俄文版的正式验证程序最近才进行。本文件记录了为正式翻译和改编俄文特定版本的AUDIT(RUS-AUDIT)而采取的不同步骤。方法:按照既定的协议将审计翻译成俄语,使用专家小组根据国家情况进行了修订和调整,并以迭代方法进行现场测试,根据世卫组织关于仪器翻译和适应的规则,总共对134名来自初级卫生保健(PHC)的患者和33名来自专业酒精治疗机构(肿瘤学)的患者进行了三个试点阶段,由专门成立的咨询委员会指导。每个版本的变化都是根据前一个试点阶段的调查结果和彻底的小组讨论得出的。结果:根据三个不同试点阶段的调查结果,RUS-AUDIT是为PHC专业人士开发的纸笔面试。由于第二个测试项目的标准饮料的表示和计数出现了各种问题,开发了一张特殊的展示卡来支持评估。初步AUDIT-C评分表明,来自PHC机构的超过三分之一的筛查女性(34.2%)和大约一半的筛查男性(50.9%)超过了风险阈值。结论:RUS-AUDIT被构建为访谈人员和患者的可行评估工具。超过风险阈值的大量PHC患者证实了对正式验证和俄罗斯特定截止分数的需求,考虑到具体的饮酒模式。
    Aims: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is one of the most widely used screening instruments worldwide. Although it was translated into many languages, not many country-specific adaptations exist, and a formal validation procedure of the Russian version has been carried out only recently. The present contribution documents the different steps taken to formally translate and adapt a Russian-specific version of the AUDIT (RUS-AUDIT). Methods: The AUDIT was translated into Russian following an established protocol, revised and adapted to the country context using an expert panel, and field-tested in an iterative approach, in line with WHO rules on instrument translation and adaptation A total of three pilot phases were carried out on 134 patients from primary healthcare (PHC) and 33 patients from specialised alcohol treatment facilities (narcology), guided by a specially established advisory board. Changes in each version were informed by the findings of the previous pilot phase and a thorough panel discussion. Results: Based on the findings of three different pilot phases, the RUS-AUDIT was developed as a paper-and-pencil interview for PHC professionals. Since various issues with representation and counting of standard drinks for the second test item arose, a special show card was developed to support the assessment. Preliminary AUDIT-C scores indicated that more than one-third of the screened women (34.2%) and about half of the screened men (50.9%) from PHC facilities have exceeded risk thresholds. Conclusions: The RUS-AUDIT was constructed as a feasible assessment tool for interviewers and patients. The large number of PHC patients who exceed the risk threshold has corroborated the need for formal validation and Russia-specific cut-off scores, considering the specific drinking patterns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中国的中风发病率正在增加,随着危险因素的流行趋势明显。饮酒也是中风的危险因素。许多队列研究探索了饮酒与中风风险之间的关系。然而,调查结果不一致。
    方法:我们采用整群抽样的方法选取了重庆市13个区县(同级),中国。然后,采用分层随机抽样的方法对各区县的人口数量进行分配。在2018年10月至2019年2月期间招募了23,308名30-79岁的成年人。后续行动通过监测系统和问卷进行,直到2022年9月。使用标准化问卷收集有关饮酒和其他协变量的信息。参与者被要求报告他们在过去一年中每周饮酒的频率和每周摄入的各种酒精饮料。饮酒频率分为三类:1-2天/周,3-5天/周,和6-7天/周。平均每日饮酒量是根据不同酒精饮料中所含的酒精量来计算的。它被归类为不饮酒者(0克/天),光照(0至12克/天),中度(13至36克/天),和高(>36克/天)。Cox比例风险回归模型用于估计饮酒与卒中风险之间的关联。结果显示为多变量调整的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
    结果:平均随访3.80年,有310例新卒中事件.总中风的发生率为368.69/100,000人年。总的来说,在调整协变量后,与不饮酒的人相比,适度饮酒(平均每日饮酒13~36g/d)与总卒中风险较低相关(HR:0.48;95%CI:0.25~0.92).每周饮酒6-7天的人的总卒中和缺血性卒中的校正HR和95%CI分别为0.60(0.37,0.96)和0.53(0.30,0.94),分别。总中风的风险(HR:0.39;95%CI:0.17-0.89)以每周饮酒6-7天的模式降低,但平均饮酒量低于36g/d。饮酒与出血性中风之间没有显着关联。
    结论:本研究提示适度饮酒与较低的总卒中风险相关。健康的饮酒模式应该引起更多关注。
    The incidence of stroke in China is increasing, along with a clear trend in the prevalence of risk factors. Alcohol consumption is also a risk factor for stroke. Many cohort studies have explored the relationship between alcohol consumption and stroke risk. However, findings have been inconsistent.
    We used cluster sampling to select 13 districts and counties (at the same level) in Chongqing, China. Then, we used stratified random sampling to distribute the number of people in each district and county. 23,308 adults aged 30-79 were recruited between October 2018 and February 2019. Follow-up was conducted through a monitoring system and questionnaires until September 2022. Information on alcohol consumption and other covariates was collected using a standardized questionnaire. Participants were asked to report their weekly frequency of drinking over the past year and weekly intake of various alcoholic beverages in general. The frequency of drinking was divided into three categories: 1-2 d/week, 3-5 d/week, and 6-7 d/week. The average daily alcohol consumption is calculated based on the amount of alcohol contained in different alcoholic beverages. It is classified as nondrinker (0 g/day), light (0 to 12 g/day), moderate (13 to 36 g/day), and high (> 36 g/day). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the association between alcohol consumption and stroke risk. Results are shown as multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
    With an average follow-up of 3.80 years, there were 310 new stroke events. The incidence of total stroke was 368.69 per 100,000 person-years. Overall, after adjusting for covariates, moderate alcohol consumption (average daily alcohol consumption 13-36 g/d) was associated with a lower risk of total stroke (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.25-0.92) compared with nondrinkers. The adjusted HR and 95% CI for total stroke and ischemic stroke for those who drank alcohol 6-7 days per week were 0.60(0.37, 0.96) and 0.53(0.30, 0.94), respectively. The risk of total stroke (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.89) was reduced in a pattern of drinking 6-7 days per week but with a mean alcohol consumption of less than 36 g/d. There was no significant association between alcohol consumption and hemorrhagic stroke.
    This study suggests moderate alcohol consumption is associated with a lower risk of total stroke. And healthy drinking patterns should be of more significant concern.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是探索饮酒模式,以及习惯性总饮水摄入量不同的年轻人的尿和血浆水合生物标志物。一项横断面研究是在北京111名年轻男子运动员中进行的,中国。通过7天评估食物中的总饮用水和水,24小时液体摄入问卷和重复部分法,分别。测试了24小时尿液和空腹血液样品的渗透压和电解质浓度。LD1(低饮酒者)组的差异,LD2,HD1和HD2(高饮酒者),根据总饮用液体的四分位数划分,使用单向方差分析进行比较,Kruskal-WallisH-tests,和卡方检验。共有109名受试者完成了研究。HD2组有更大量的TWI(总饮水量)和更高和更低的总饮用水液体和水从食物对TWI的贡献,分别,比LD1、LD2和HD1组(p<0.05),但四组之间的食物水分含量没有显着差异(均p>0.05)。HD2组的参与者的水量高于LD1,LD2和HD1组的参与者(p<0.05);SSB是总饮用液体的第二大贡献者,从24.0%到31.8%不等。处于最佳水合状态的受试者百分比从LD1组的11.8%增加到HD2组的58.8%(p<0.05)。HD2和HD1组的尿液体积比LD1和LD2组高212-227(p<0.05)。血浆生物标志物无显著差异(p>0.05),HD1组的K浓度高于LD1组(p<0.05)。总饮用液量较高的受试者比总饮用液量较低的受试者具有更好的水合状态。但不是更好的饮酒模式。习惯性总饮用液体不影响血浆生物标志物。
    The purposes of this study were to explore the drinking patterns, and urinary and plasma hydration biomarkers of young adults with different levels of habitual total drinking fluid intake. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 111 young male athletes in Beijing, China. Total drinking fluids and water from food were assessed by a 7-day, 24-h fluid intake questionnaire and the duplicate portion method, respectively. The osmolality and electrolyte concentrations of the 24-h urine and fasting blood samples were tested. Differences in groups LD1 (low drinker), LD2, HD1, and HD2 (high drinker), divided according to the quartiles of total drinking fluids, were compared using one-way ANOVA, Kruskal−Wallis H-tests, and chi-squared tests. A total of 109 subjects completed the study. The HD2 group had greater amounts of TWI (total water intake) and higher and lower contributions of total drinking fluids and water from food to TWI, respectively, than the LD1, LD2, and HD1 groups (p < 0.05), but the amounts of water from food did not differ significantly among the four groups (all p > 0.05). Participants in the HD2 group had higher amounts of water than participants in the LD1, LD2, and HD1 groups (p < 0.05); SSBs were the second top contributor of total drinking fluids, ranging from 24.0% to 31.8%. The percentage of subjects in optimal hydration status increased from 11.8% in the LD1 group to 58.8% in the HD2 group (p < 0.05). The HD2 and HD1 groups had 212−227 higher volumes of urine than the LD1 and LD2 groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the plasma biomarkers (p > 0.05), with the exception of higher concentrations of K in the HD1 group than in the LD1 group (p < 0.05). Subjects with higher amounts of total drinking fluids had better hydration status than those with lower total drinking fluids, but not better drinking patterns. Habitual total drinking fluids did not affect the plasma biomarkers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在芬兰,人均酒精消费量在2000年代初增加,2007年后下降。我们的目的是确定这些变化是如何源于饮酒习惯的变化。
    重复横断面普通人群调查。
    2000年、2008年和2016年的芬兰。
    15-69岁的芬兰居民(n=6703,反应率59-78%)。
    饮酒场合的事件级别数据(n=21097)。通过使用场合特征的潜在类别分析确定了饮酒场合的类型(饮酒习惯)。消费和醉酒场合的总量被分解为饮酒实践课程和年份的贡献。
    确定了九种饮酒场合类型:三种在家中没有家人以外的陪伴(2016年占51%),三个社交场合在不同的地方和不同的公司(33%)和三个聚会场合类型(16%)。饮酒场合类型的频率和特定场合类型的饮酒量都会导致饮酒总量的变化。在没有外部陪伴的情况下在家喝酒(只有家人;对于男人来说,也仅此一项)在2008年之前对酒精使用量的增加做出了最大贡献。在2000年代,家庭和酒吧的大型聚会变得不那么普遍了,对2008年后饮酒下降的贡献最大。
    2000年代初,芬兰人均饮酒量的增加似乎主要与没有外部陪伴的家中较轻饮酒场合的增加有关。2007年后人均饮酒量下降主要与家庭和许可场所的大型聚会减少有关。饮酒频率和每次饮酒量的变化与酒精承受能力的变化方向相同。
    In Finland, per-capita alcohol consumption increased in the early 2000s and decreased after 2007. Our aim was to determine how these changes originated from changes in drinking practices.
    Repeated cross-sectional general-population surveys.
    Finland in 2000, 2008 and 2016.
    Finnish residents aged 15-69 years (n = 6703, response rate 59-78%).
    Event-level data on drinking occasions (n = 21 097). Types of drinking occasions (drinking practices) were identified with latent class analysis using occasion characteristics. The aggregated volume of consumption and intoxication occasions were decomposed into contributions from drinking practice classes and years.
    Nine drinking occasion types were identified: three at home without company other than family (51% of occasions in 2016), three socializing occasions in different places and with different company (33%) and three party occasion types (16%). Both the frequency of drinking occasion types and the occasion type-specific amounts of alcohol consumed contributed to aggregate-level changes in alcohol use. Drinking at home without external company (with family only; for men, also alone) contributed most to the increase in alcohol use before 2008. Big parties in homes and bars became less common in the 2000s, contributing most to the decline in drinking after 2008.
    The rise in per-capita alcohol consumption in Finland in the early 2000s appears to have been linked mainly to an increase in lighter drinking occasions at home without external company. The fall in per-capita drinking after 2007 was linked mainly to a decrease in big parties in homes and in licensed premises. Changes in drinking frequency and the amounts of alcohol consumed per occasion changed in the same direction as alcohol affordability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    两种不相互排斥的理论解释了COVID-19大流行对饮酒的影响。可用性假设认为,由于商店和消费场所的关闭而减少的饮酒机会应导致酒精使用量的减少,而压力和应对假说认为,那些暴露在压力环境中的人可能会增加饮酒。这项研究的主要目的是研究在COVID-19封锁之前和期间,意大利年轻人(18-34岁)饮酒模式患病率的变化--分别按性别分类。研究设计是一项重复的横断面研究,对2015年和2020年从全国代表性样本中收集的数据进行了分析。潜在类别分析确定了五个,女性完全不变,男性部分不变,两个队列中的饮酒模式类别:当前非饮酒者(CND),周末有风险(WRD)和周末无风险饮酒者(WnRD),每日非风险饮酒者(DnRD)和每日风险饮酒者(DRD)。为了支持可用性假设,从2015年到2020年,男性和女性的弃权和适度饮酒人数有所增加。同时,在男性中,以危险饮酒为特征的模式的患病率也有所增加,应对饮酒动机和相关危害(压力和应对假设)。这场大流行和意大利政府实施的三级封锁可能会减少适度饮酒的普通人群的整体饮酒。然而,少数但重要的男性人群的患病率大幅增加,他们每天大量饮酒以应对疾病。外联和预防工作应主要针对这一群体,但也要考虑隔离的特殊情况为任何人提供的机会,以重塑他们的生活方式和健康相关行为。
    Two not mutually exclusive theories explain the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on alcohol use. The Availability hypothesis contends that reduced opportunities to drink due to the closure of outlets and consumption sites should lead to decreases in alcohol use, whereas the Stress and Coping hypothesis argues that those exposed to stressful situations may increase drinking. The primary aim of this study was to examine changes-separately by gender-in the prevalence of drinking patterns among Italian young adults (18-34 years) before and during a COVID-19 lockdown. Study design was a repeated cross-sectional study, whereby data collected in 2015 and 2020 from nationally representative samples were analyzed. Latent class analysis identified five, fully invariant for women and partially invariant for men, drinking pattern classes among both cohorts: current non-drinkers (CND), weekend risky (WRD) and weekend non-risky drinkers (WnRD), daily non-risky (DnRD) and daily risky drinkers (DRD). In support of the Availability hypothesis, increases in abstaining and moderate drinking women and men were observed from 2015 to 2020. Concomitantly, among men only there were also increases in the prevalence of patterns characterized by risky drinking, coping drinking motives and related harm (Stress and Coping hypothesis). The pandemic and the three-tier lockdown imposed by the Italian government likely reduced overall alcohol use in the general population who drink moderately. However, there was a substantial increase in the prevalence of a small but significant group of men who drank daily and heavily to cope. Outreach and prevention efforts should target primarily this group, but also consider the opportunities that the exceptional circumstances of a quarantine offer to any individuals to reshape their lifestyle and health-related behaviors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人体的水和钠平衡受到大脑的严格调节和监测。很少有研究探讨水和盐摄入量之间的关系,钠摄入量与不同程度的液体摄入是否会导致水合状态的变化尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定每日盐摄入量不同的年轻人的水摄入量和水合状态。通过7天(从第1天到第7天)和重复部分法(第5天,第6天和第7天)的7天24小时液体摄入问卷确定参与者的总饮用水液和食物中的水。收集3天(第5天,第6天和第7天)24小时的尿液并测试渗透压,尿液比重(USG),电解质的浓度,pH值,肌酐,尿酸和尿素。收集1天(第6天)的空腹血液样品并测量渗透压和电解质浓度。根据3天(第5天,第6天和第7天)24小时尿液的Na浓度评估参与者的盐摄入量。参与者根据盐摄入量的四分位数分为四组,包括低盐摄入量(LS1),LS2、高盐摄取(HS1)和HS2组。总的来说,156名参与者(包括80名男性和76名女性年轻人)完成了这项研究。四组参与者的盐摄入量分别为7.6、10.9、14.7和22.4g(LS1、LS2、HS1和HS2组,分别),各组差异均有统计学意义(F=252.020;所有p<0.05)。与LS1和LS2组相比,HS2组从总饮水量(TWI)中增加了310-381、250-358和382-655mL的水量,来自食物的总饮用水液和水(所有p<0.05),分别。HS2组的参与者在水中增加了384-403,129-228和81-114mL,来自菜肴和主食的水,分别,与LS1和LS2组相比(p<0.05)。HS2组比LS1和LS2组多排泄386-793mL尿液(p<0.05)。然而,关于尿液渗透压,具有最佳水合状态的参与者百分比从LS1和LS2组的41.0%降至HS2组的25.6%(p<0.05).盐摄入量较高的参与者有较高的TWI,食物中的总饮用水和水。然而,他们的水合状态较差。应鼓励年轻人减少盐摄入量,以保持最佳的水合状态。
    The body\'s water and sodium balances are tightly regulated and monitored by the brain. Few studies have explored the relationship between water and salt intake, and whether sodium intake with different levels of fluid intake leads to changes in hydration status remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine the patterns of water intake and hydration status among young adults with different levels of daily salt intakes. Participants\' total drinking fluids and water from food were determined by a 7-day 24-h fluid intake questionnaire for 7 days (from Day 1 to Day 7) and duplicate portion method (Day 5, Day 6 and Day 7). Urine of 24 h for 3 days (Day 5, Day 6 and Day 7) was collected and tested for the osmolality, the urine-specific gravity (USG), the concentrations of electrolytes, pH, creatinine, uric acid and the urea. The fasting blood samples for 1 day (Day 6) were collected and measured for the osmolality and the concentrations of electrolytes. The salt intakes of the participants were evaluated from the concentrations of Na of 24 h urine of 3 days (Day 5, Day 6 and Day 7). Participants were divided into four groups according to the quartile of salt intake, including the low salt intake (LS1), LS2, high salt intake (HS1) and HS2 groups. In total, 156 participants (including 80 male and 76 female young adults) completed the study. The salt intakes were 7.6, 10.9, 14.7 and 22.4 g among participants in the four groups (LS1, LS2, HS1 and HS2 groups, respectively), which differed significantly in all groups (F = 252.020; all p < 0.05). Compared to the LS1 and LS2 groups, the HS2 group had 310-381, 250-358 and 382-655 mL more amounts of water from the total water intake (TWI), total drinking fluids and water from food (all p < 0.05), respectively. Participants in the HS2 group had 384-403, 129-228 and 81-114 mL more in the water, water from dishes and staple foods, respectively, than those in the groups of LS1 and LS2 (p < 0.05). The HS2 group excreted 386-793 mL more urine than those in the groups of LS1 and LS2 (p < 0.05). However, regarding urine osmolality, the percentage of participants with optimal hydration status decreased from 41.0% in LS1 and LS2 to 25.6% in the HS2 group (p < 0.05). Participants with higher salt intake had higher TWI, total drinking fluids and water from food. Nevertheless, they had inferior hydration status. A reduction in salt intake should be encouraged among young adults to maintain optimal hydration status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    饮酒是肝肿瘤和非肿瘤疾病的重要危险因素。问题依然存在,然而,关于饮酒模式和酒精耐受性与疾病风险的相关性,这在中国和西方人口之间有很大的不同。
    前瞻性的中国嘉道理生物库包括2004-2008年从十个地区招募的512,715名30-79岁的成年人(占男性的41%),记录酒精摄入量,饮酒模式,和其他特征。经过10年的平均随访,2531例肝癌,2040肝硬化,260酒精性肝病(ALD),在基线时无癌症或慢性肝病的492,643名参与者中,记录了1262例非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)病例.Cox回归用于估计将酒精摄入和饮酒模式与每种疾病相关的调整后的风险比(HR)。
    总的来说,33%的男性和2%的女性在基线时定期(即至少每周一次)饮酒。在男性目前经常喝酒的人中,饮酒与几种主要慢性肝病的风险呈正剂量反应关系,对于肝癌(n=547),每280克/周的HR(即大约4杯/天)较高的常规酒精摄入量为1.44(95%CI1.23-1.69),1.83(1.60-2.09)用于肝硬化(n=388),2.01(1.77-2.28)用于ALD(n=200),NAFLD为1.71(1.35-2.16)(n=198),和1.52(1.40-1.64)为总肝病(n=1775)。与ALD的关联在报告潮红的男性中似乎更强(即,酒精耐受性低)。调整每周饮酒总量后,与非每日饮酒者相比,每日饮酒者患ALD的风险显著增加(2.15,1.40-3.31),和不吃饭饮酒与肝癌的风险显著增加(1.32,1.01-1.72),肝硬化(1.37,1.02-1.85),和ALD(1.60,1.09-2.33)与随餐饮酒相比。女性目前经常饮酒的人患ALD的风险明显更高,但不是其他肝脏疾病,而不是女性弃权者。
    在中国男人中,饮酒与几种主要慢性肝病的风险显着增加有关,和某些饮酒模式(例如,每天饮酒,不吃饭喝酒)可能会进一步加剧疾病风险。
    Alcohol consumption is an important risk factor for hepatic neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases. Questions remain, however, about the relevance to disease risk of drinking patterns and alcohol tolerability, which differ appreciably between Chinese and Western populations.
    The prospective China Kadoorie Biobank included 512,715 adults (41% men) aged 30-79 years recruited from ten areas during 2004-2008, recording alcohol intake, drinking patterns, and other characteristics. After median 10 years\' follow-up, 2531 incident liver cancer, 2040 liver cirrhosis, 260 alcoholic liver disease (ALD), and 1262 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cases were recorded among 492,643 participants without prior cancer or chronic liver disease at baseline. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) relating alcohol intake and drinking patterns to each disease.
    Overall, 33% of men and 2% of women drank alcohol regularly (i.e. at least weekly) at baseline. Among male current regular drinkers, alcohol consumption showed positive dose-response associations with risks of several major chronic liver diseases, with HRs per 280 g/week (i.e. around four drinks/day) higher usual alcohol intake of 1.44 (95% CI 1.23-1.69) for liver cancer (n = 547), 1.83 (1.60-2.09) for liver cirrhosis (n = 388), 2.01 (1.77-2.28) for ALD (n = 200), 1.71 (1.35-2.16) for NAFLD (n = 198), and 1.52 (1.40-1.64) for total liver disease (n = 1775). The association with ALD appeared stronger among men reporting flushing (i.e., with low alcohol tolerance). After adjustment for the total amount of weekly alcohol consumption, daily drinkers had significantly increased risk of ALD (2.15, 1.40-3.31) compared with non-daily drinkers, and drinking without meals was associated with significantly greater risks of liver cancer (1.32, 1.01-1.72), liver cirrhosis (1.37, 1.02-1.85), and ALD (1.60, 1.09-2.33) compared with drinking with meals. Female current regular drinkers had significantly higher risk of ALD, but not other liver diseases, than female abstainers.
    In Chinese men, alcohol intake was associated with significantly increased risks of several major chronic liver diseases, and certain drinking patterns (e.g. drinking daily, drinking without meals) may further exacerbate the disease risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    饮酒与几种特定部位癌症的风险增加有关,但它在许多其他癌症中的作用仍然没有定论。来自中国的证据比较有限,癌症发病率,饮酒模式和酒精耐受性与西方人群有很大不同。前瞻性中国嘉道理生物银行在2004年至2008年期间从10个不同地区招募了>512,000名30至79岁的成年人,通过标准化问卷记录了饮酒模式。根据饮料类型,自我报告的饮酒量估计为每周纯酒精的克数,每次消耗的量和饮酒频率。经过10年的随访,26961人罹患癌症。Cox回归用于估计调整后的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),将饮酒与特定部位癌症的发生率相关。总的来说,33%(n=69734)的男性定期饮酒(即,≥每周)在基线。在男性目前经常喝酒的人中,饮酒与食道癌风险呈正剂量-反应关系(655个事件;HR=1.98[95CI1.79-2.18],每280克/周),嘴和喉咙(236;1.74[1.48-2.05]),肝脏(573;1.52[1.31-1.76]),结肠直肠(575;1.19[1.00-1.43]),胆囊(107;1.60[1.16-2.22])和肺(1017;1.25[1.10-1.42]),在从不吸烟者和经常吸烟者中也是如此。调整总酒精摄入量后,与非每日饮酒者相比,每日饮酒者患食道癌的风险更大,而不进餐饮酒时患肝癌的风险更大.报告饮酒后潮红的男性患食管癌和肺癌的风险更大。在这个男性群体中,饮酒占癌症病例的7%。在女性中,只有2%的人经常喝酒,饮酒与癌症风险之间没有明确的关联。在中国男人中,饮酒与多个地点的癌症风险增加有关,具有某些饮酒模式(例如,daily,不吃饭就喝酒)和低酒精耐受性进一步加剧了风险。
    Alcohol drinking is associated with increased risks of several site-specific cancers, but its role in many other cancers remains inconclusive. Evidence is more limited from China, where cancer rates, drinking patterns and alcohol tolerability differ importantly from Western populations. The prospective China Kadoorie Biobank recruited >512 000 adults aged 30 to 79 years from 10 diverse areas during 2004 to 2008, recording alcohol consumption patterns by a standardised questionnaire. Self-reported alcohol consumption was estimated as grams of pure alcohol per week based on beverage type, amount consumed per occasion and drinking frequency. After 10 years of follow-up, 26 961 individuals developed cancer. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) relating alcohol consumption to incidence of site-specific cancers. Overall, 33% (n = 69 734) of men drank alcohol regularly (ie, ≥weekly) at baseline. Among male current regular drinkers, alcohol intake showed positive dose-response associations with risks of cancers in the oesophagus (655 events; HR = 1.98 [95%CI 1.79-2.18], per 280 g/wk), mouth and throat (236; 1.74 [1.48-2.05]), liver (573; 1.52 [1.31-1.76]), colon-rectum (575; 1.19 [1.00-1.43]), gallbladder (107; 1.60 [1.16-2.22]) and lung (1017; 1.25 [1.10-1.42]), similarly among never- and ever-regular smokers. After adjustment for total alcohol intake, there were greater risks of oesophageal cancer in daily drinkers than nondaily drinkers and of liver cancer when drinking without meals. The risks of oesophageal cancer and lung cancer were greater in men reporting flushing after drinking than not. In this male population, alcohol drinking accounted for 7% of cancer cases. Among women, only 2% drank regularly, with no clear associations between alcohol consumption and cancer risk. Among Chinese men, alcohol drinking is associated with increased risks of cancer at multiple sites, with certain drinking patterns (eg, daily, drinking without meals) and low alcohol tolerance further exacerbating the risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管超过40%的美国退伍军人有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的生命周期,对当前饮酒模式的患病率和相关性知之甚少(即,禁欲,亚阈值,危险饮酒)在这个人群中。目标:描述禁欲的患病率和关键相关性,亚阈值饮酒,和危险饮酒在美国退伍军人的全国代表性样本与终身AUD。方法:使用方差分析对参加国家健康和退伍军人复原力研究的1,282名终身AUD退伍军人的数据进行了分析,卡方分析,和多项回归模型。结果:在1,282名终身AUD的退伍军人中(其中94.7%为男性),674人(48.2%)是过去一年的亚阈值饮酒者,317人(28.0%)是戒酒者,291人(23.8%)是有害饮酒者。禁欲的退伍军人年纪大了,受教育程度较低,较少的社会参与,并且比阈值以下和危险的饮酒者有更高的宗教信仰。他们也更有可能吸烟,PTSD筛查阳性,报告的躯体症状比亚阈值饮酒者更大,并且比危险的饮酒者有更多的身体困难和终生创伤。低于阈值的饮酒者比危险的饮酒者更有可能是女性,并且报告身体健康问题,吸烟和抑郁的可能性较小。结论:超过四分之三的终身AUD美国退伍军人目前是戒酒或亚阈值饮酒者。与禁欲相关的因素包括年龄较大,健康问题,宗教和社会参与。结果表明,退伍军人当前的饮酒模式与健康和社会心理因素之间存在“J形”关系,低于阈值的饮酒者通常比禁欲和危险的饮酒者有更好的健康。
    Background: Although more than 40% of US military veterans have lifetime histories of alcohol use disorder (AUD), little is known about the prevalence and correlates of current drinking patterns (i.e., abstinent, subthreshold, hazardous drinking) in this population. Objectives: To characterize the prevalence and key correlates of abstinence, subthreshold drinking, and hazardous drinking in a nationally representative sample of US veterans with lifetime AUD. Methods: Data from 1,282 veterans with lifetime AUD who participated in the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study were analyzed using analyses of variance, chi-square analyses, and multinomial regression models. Results: Of the 1,282 veterans with lifetime AUD (of which 94.7% were males), 674 (48.2%) were past-year subthreshold drinkers, 317 (28.0%) were abstinent and 291 (23.8%) were hazardous drinkers. Abstinent veterans were older, less educated, less socially engaged, and had higher levels of religiosity than subthreshold and hazardous drinkers. They were also more likely to smoke, screen positive for PTSD, reported greater somatic symptoms than subthreshold drinkers, and had more physical difficulties and lifetime trauma than hazardous drinkers. Subthreshold drinkers were more likely than hazardous drinkers to be female and report physical health problems and less likely to smoke and be depressed. Conclusion: More than three-quarters of US veterans with lifetime AUD are currently abstinent or subthreshold drinkers. Factors associated with abstinence included older age, health problems, religiosity and social engagement. Results suggest a \"J-shaped\" relationship between current drinking patterns and health and psychosocial factors in veterans, with subthreshold drinkers generally having better health than abstinent and hazardous drinkers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目的是调查习惯性总饮水摄入量不同的年轻人的饮水模式和水合生物标志物。
    方法:对保定市159名18-23岁青壮年进行了横断面研究,中国。通过7天24小时液体摄入问卷和重复部分法评估食物中的总饮用液体和水,分别。测试了24小时尿液和空腹血液样品的渗透压和电解质浓度。LD1(低饮酒者)的差异,LD2,LD3和HD(高饮酒者)组,根据总饮用液体的四分位数进行分层,使用单向方差分析进行比较,Kruskal-WallisH检验和卡方检验。
    结果:共有156名参与者(80名男性和76名女性)完成了这项研究。HD组的TWI(总饮水量)较多,来自食物的水,来自食物的总饮用水和水对TWI的贡献较高和较低,分别,LD1、LD2和LD3组(p<0.05)。HD组的参与者比LD1,LD2和LD3组的参与者有更多的水和来自盘子的水(p<0.05)。在四组中,不同液体对总饮用液体的贡献没有显着差异(p>0.05)。LD1组尿液渗透压比LD2,LD3和HD组高59-143mOsm/kg(p<0.05)。处于最佳水合状态的参与者百分比从LD1组的12.8%增加到HD组的56.4%(p<0.05)。HD和LD3组的尿量比LD1和LD2组高386〜793(p<0.05)。四组间电解质浓度存在差异(p<0.05)。血浆生物标志物无显著差异(p>0.05),LD3和HD组的Mg浓度高于LD1和LD2组(p<0.05)。
    结论:总饮用液体较高的参与者的饮用模式和水合状态更好。应采取干预措施,建议成年人有足够的总饮用液体,以保持最佳的水化状态。
    背景:注册编号为ChiCTR-ROC-17010320,已在中国临床试验注册中心注册。
    BACKGROUND: The purposes were to investigate the drinking patterns and hydration biomarkers among young adults with different levels of habitual total drinking fluids intake.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 159 young adults aged 18-23 years in Baoding, China. Total drinking fluids and water from food were assessed by 7-day 24-h fluid intake questionnaire and duplicate portion method, respectively. The osmolality and electrolyte concentrations of the 24 h urine and fasting blood samples were tested. Differences in LD1 (low drinker), LD2, LD3 and HD (high drinker) groups, stratified according to the quartiles of total drinking fluids, were compared using one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis H test and chi-square test.
    RESULTS: A total of 156 participants (80 males and 76 females) completed the study. HD group had greater amounts of TWI (Total Water Intake), water from food, higher and lower contributions of total drinking fluids and water from food to TWI, respectively, than LD1, LD2 and LD3 groups (p < 0.05). Participants in HD group had higher amounts of water and water from dishes than participants in LD1, LD2 and LD3 groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the contributions of different fluids to total drinking fluids within the four groups (p > 0.05). The osmolality of urine was 59-143 mOsm/kg higher in LD1 than that in LD2, LD3 and HD group (p < 0.05). The percentage of participants in optimal hydration status increased from 12.8% in LD1 group to 56.4% in HD group (p < 0.05). HD and LD3 groups had 386~793 higher volumes of urine than that of LD1 and LD2 groups (p < 0.05). Differences were found in the concentrations of electrolytes among the four groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the plasma biomarkers (p > 0.05), with the exception of higher concentration of Mg in LD3 and HD groups than that in LD1 and LD2 groups (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Participants with higher total drinking fluids had better drinking pattern and hydration status. Interventions should be undertaken to advise adults to have adequate total drinking fluids, in order to keep in optimal hydration status.
    BACKGROUND: The registration number was ChiCTR-ROC-17010320, which was registered on the Chinese clinical trial registry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号