Diverticulitis, Colonic

憩室炎,结肠
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    憩室炎患者的护理正在经历范式转变。这篇叙述性综述总结了目前左侧简单和复杂憩室炎的证据。最新的病理生理学,诊断的进步,并审查了预防策略。
    治疗正在转向门诊,医生们放弃了治疗简单疾病的抗生素,择期手术治疗憩室炎的决定已经变得偏好敏感。此外,指导憩室炎手术治疗的最新数据包括采用新的微创和机器人辅助技术.
    这篇综述提供了治疗憩室炎的最佳实践的最新摘要,以指导结直肠和普通外科医生治疗这种常见疾病的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Care of patients with diverticulitis is undergoing a paradigm shift. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence for left-sided uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis. The latest pathophysiology, advances in diagnosis, and prevention strategies are also reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment is moving to the outpatient setting, physicians are forgoing antibiotics for uncomplicated disease, and the decision for elective surgery for diverticulitis has become preference sensitive. Furthermore, the most current data guiding surgical management of diverticulitis include the adoption of new minimally invasive and robot-assisted techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: This review provides an updated summary of the best practices in the management of diverticulitis to guide colorectal and general surgeons in their treatment of patients with this common disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    憩室炎最初发作后复发或持续症状很常见,然而很少进行手术治疗。目前的指导方针对是否操作缺乏明确的建议,尽管最近的研究表明手术后生活质量得到改善。因此,这项研究的目的是比较保守治疗和手术治疗的复发性或持续憩室炎患者的生活质量,对是否对这些患者进行手术的问题给出了更明确的答案。
    在EMBASE中进行了系统的文献检索,MEDLINE和Cochrane.仅包括报告生活质量的比较研究。统计分析包括计算加权平均差和合并比值比。
    纳入了5项研究;2项RCT和3项回顾性观察性研究。与保守治疗相比,在每次随访时,手术治疗组的SF-36评分均较高,但只有6个月随访时SF-36评分的差异有统计学意义(MD6.02,95CI2.62~9.42).手术组GIQLI评分也较高,6个月随访时MD为14.01(95CI8.15-19.87),最后一次随访时MD为7.42(95CI1.23-12.85)。此外,在最后可用的后续行动中,手术组的复发明显减少(OR0.10,95CI0.05-0.23,p<0.001).
    虽然手术治疗复发性憩室炎并非没有风险,与保守治疗相比,它可能改善复发或持续憩室炎患者的长期生活质量.因此,应该在这个患者组中考虑。
    UNASSIGNED: Recurrences or persistent symptoms after an initial episode of diverticulitis are common, yet surgical treatment is rarely performed. Current guidelines lack clear recommendations on whether or not to operate, even though recent studies suggest an improved quality of life following surgery. The aim of this study is therefore to compare quality of life in patients with recurrent or ongoing diverticulitis treated conservatively versus surgically, giving a more definitive answer to the question of whether or not to operate on these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane. Only comparative studies reporting on quality of life were included. Statistical analysis included calculation of weighted mean differences and pooled odds ratios.
    UNASSIGNED: Five studies were included; two RCT\'s and three retrospective observational studies. Compared to conservative treatment, the SF-36 scores were higher in the surgically treated group at each follow-up moment but only the difference in SF-36 physical scores at six months follow-up was statistically significant (MD 6.02, 95%CI 2.62-9.42). GIQLI scores were also higher in the surgical group with a MD of 14.01 (95%CI 8.15-19.87) at six months follow-up and 7.42 (95%CI 1.23-12.85) at last available follow-up. Also, at last available follow-up, significantly fewer recurrences occurred in the surgery group (OR 0.10, 95%CI 0.05-0.23, p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Although surgery for recurrent diverticulitis is not without risk, it might improve long-term quality of life in patients suffering from recurrent- or ongoing diverticulitis when compared to conservative treatment. Therefore, it should be considered in this patient group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:评估门诊(OP)和住院(IP)治疗以及抗生素(ABX)和无抗生素(NABX)方法治疗无并发症(Hinchey1a级)急性憩室炎的比较结果。
    方法:使用电子数据库进行系统的在线搜索。包括OP与IP治疗以及ABX与NABX方法治疗Hinchey1a级急性憩室炎的比较研究。主要结果是憩室炎复发。急诊和选择性手术切除,复杂憩室炎的发展,死亡率,和住院时间是其他评估的次要结局参数.
    结果:文献检索确定了12项研究(n=3,875),比较了NABX(n=2,008)和ABX(n=1,867)。与ABX组相比,NABX组的疾病复发率较低,住院时间较短(P=0.01)和(P=0.004)。在急诊切除中没有观察到显著差异(P=0.33)。选择性切除(P=0.73),复杂憩室炎的发展(P=0.65),再入院率(P=0.65)和30天死亡率(P=0.91).12项研究(n=2,286)比较了OP(n=1,021)和IP(n=1,265)治疗无并发症的急性憩室炎。两组在以下结果方面具有可比性:治疗失败(P=0.10),急诊手术切除(P=0.40),择期切除(P=0.30),疾病复发(P=0.22),死亡率(P=0.61)。
    结论:在选定的无并发症急性憩室炎(Hinchey1a分类)的临床稳定患者中,仅观察治疗是可行且安全的。它可以提供更好的结果,包括缩短住院时间。此外,OP方法治疗Hinchey1a急性憩室炎患者与IP治疗相当.未来需要高质量的随机对照研究来了解在OP设置中使用NABX方法来管理无并发症的急性憩室炎患者的结果。
    BACKGROUND: To evaluate comparative outcomes of outpatient (OP) versus inpatient (IP) treatment and antibiotics (ABX) versus no antibiotics (NABX) approach in the treatment of uncomplicated (Hinchey grade 1a) acute diverticulitis.
    METHODS: A systematic online search was conducted using electronic databases. Comparative studies of OP versus IP treatment and ABX versus NABX approach in the treatment of Hinchey grade 1a acute diverticulitis were included. Primary outcome was recurrence of diverticulitis. Emergency and elective surgical resections, development of complicated diverticulitis, mortality rate, and length of hospital stay were the other evaluated secondary outcome parameters.
    RESULTS: The literature search identified twelve studies (n = 3,875) comparing NABX (n = 2,008) versus ABX (n = 1,867). The NABX group showed a lower disease recurrence rate and shorter length of hospital stay compared with the ABX group (P = 0.01) and (P = 0.004). No significant difference was observed in emergency resections (P = 0.33), elective resections (P = 0.73), development of complicated diverticulitis (P = 0.65), hospital re-admissions (P = 0.65) and 30-day mortality rate (P = 0.91). Twelve studies (n = 2,286) compared OP (n = 1,021) versus IP (n = 1,265) management of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. The two groups were comparable for the following outcomes: treatment failure (P = 0.10), emergency surgical resection (P = 0.40), elective resection (P = 0.30), disease recurrence (P = 0.22), and mortality rate (P = 0.61).
    CONCLUSIONS: Observation-only treatment is feasible and safe in selected clinically stable patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (Hinchey 1a classification). It may provide better outcomes including decreased length of hospital stay. Moreover, the OP approach in treating patients with Hinchey 1a acute diverticulitis is comparable to IP management. Future high-quality randomised controlled studies are needed to understand the outcomes of the NABX approach used in an OP setting in managing patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    为了确定是否术前因素,如年龄,合并症,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类,体重指数(BMI),腹膜炎的严重程度会影响进行原发性吻合术(PA)或Hartmann手术(HP)治疗穿孔憩室炎的患者的发病率和死亡率。这是一个系统的回顾和荟萃分析,根据PRISMA的说法,通过对PubMed的电子搜索,Medline,科克伦图书馆,和谷歌学者数据库。搜索检索了614项研究,其中包括11个。术前-术中因素,包括年龄,ASA分类,BMI,腹膜炎的严重程度,并收集了合并症。主要终点是死亡率和术后并发症,包括脓毒症,手术部位感染,伤口裂开,出血,术后肠梗阻,造口并发症,吻合口漏,和树桩泄漏。包括133,304名患者,其中126,504人(94.9%)接受了HP,6800人(5.1%)接受了PA。两组在合并症方面没有差异(p=0.32),BMI(p=0.28),或腹膜炎的严重程度(p=0.09)。死亡率无差异[RR0.76(0.44-1.33);p=0.33];[RR0.66(0.33-1.35);p=0.25]。HP组术后非手术并发症较多(p=0.02)。HP组腹膜炎的严重程度与死亡率之间存在显着关联(p=0.01),和手术部位感染(p=0.01)。在穿孔憩室炎患者中,可以选择PA。年龄,合并症,BMI不影响术后结局。腹膜炎的严重程度应作为术后发病率和死亡率的预测指标。
    To determine if preoperative-intraoperative factors such as age, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI), and severity of peritonitis affect the rate of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing a primary anastomosis (PA) or Hartmann Procedure (HP) for perforated diverticulitis. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA, with an electronic search of the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. The search retrieved 614 studies, of which 11 were included. Preoperative-Intraoperative factors including age, ASA classification, BMI, severity of peritonitis, and comorbidities were collected. Primary endpoints were mortality and postoperative complications including sepsis, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, hemorrhage, postoperative ileus, stoma complications, anastomotic leak, and stump leakage. 133,304 patients were included, of whom 126,504 (94.9%) underwent a HP and 6800 (5.1%) underwent a PA. There was no difference between the groups with regards to comorbidities (p = 0.32), BMI (p = 0.28), or severity of peritonitis (p = 0.09). There was no difference in mortality [RR 0.76 (0.44-1.33); p = 0.33]; [RR 0.66 (0.33-1.35); p = 0.25]. More non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the HP group (p = 0.02). There was a significant association in the HP group between the severity of peritonitis and mortality (p = 0.01), and surgical site infection (p = 0.01). In patients with perforated diverticulitis, PA can be chosen. Age, comorbidities, and BMI do not influence postoperative outcomes. The severity of peritonitis should be taken into account as a predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    无并发症的急性结肠憩室炎是否需要抗菌治疗仍存在争议。我们对抗菌药物对这种疾病的疗效进行了系统评价,包括近年来报道的新的随机对照试验(RCTs),并使用荟萃分析方法评估其疗效。使用PubMed搜索RCT,EMBASE,谷歌学者,科克伦图书馆,Ichushi-Web,和八个登记册。关键词是结肠憩室炎,\'憩室炎\',\'抗菌剂\',\'\'抗生素,\'并发症\',\'脓肿\',\'胃肠道穿孔\',\'胃肠道梗阻\',\'憩室出血\',和“瘘管”。由多个评审人员使用统一的纳入标准选择干预组抗菌治疗和对照组安慰剂或不治疗的研究。并提取数据。任何并发症的预防被评估为主要结果。疗效表示为风险比(RR)和风险差(RD)。使用21项研究中的5项RCTs进行荟萃分析,这些研究在初始搜索中符合审查条件,并符合最终纳入条件。其中三项研究未包括在先前的荟萃分析中。受试者包括干预组1039和对照组1040。集合RR=0.86(95%置信区间,0.58-1.28)和合并的RD=-0.01(-0.03至0.01),用于抗微生物剂减少任何并发症的效果。反复出现,再入院,和手术干预没有显着显示使用抗菌药物的有效性。最近报道的RCTs的荟萃分析没有提供证据表明抗菌治疗可改善无并发症的急性结肠憩室炎的临床结局。
    The need for antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis of the colon remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of antimicrobial agents against this disease, including new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in recent years, and evaluated their efficacy using a meta-analytic approach. RCTs were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Ichushi-Web, and eight registries. Keywords were \'colonic diverticulitis\', \'diverticulitis\', \'antimicrobial agents\', \'\'antibiotics, \'complication\', \'abscess\', \'gastrointestinal perforation\', \'gastrointestinal obstruction\', \'diverticular hemorrhage\', and \'fistula\'. Studies with antimicrobial treatment in the intervention group and placebo or no treatment in the control group were selected by multiple reviewers using uniform inclusion criteria, and data were extracted. Prevention of any complication was assessed as the primary outcome, and efficacy was expressed as risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD). A meta-analysis was performed using 5 RCTs of the 21 studies that were eligible for scrutiny in the initial search and which qualified for final inclusion. Three of these studies were not included in the previous meta-analysis. Subjects included 1039 in the intervention group and 1040 in the control group. Pooled RR = 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.28) and pooled RD = -0.01 (-0.03 to 0.01) for the effect of antimicrobial agents in reducing any complications. Recurrences, readmissions, and surgical interventions did not significantly show the efficacies of using antimicrobial agents. A meta-analysis of recently reported RCTs did not provide evidence that antimicrobial therapy improves clinical outcomes in uncomplicated acute diverticulitis of the colon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:憩室疾病,包括憩室炎,当患者出现症状时开始。乙状结肠憩室炎对应于乙状结肠憩室的炎症/感染。在憩室病患者中,4.3%发展为憩室炎,一种常见的病理,可能导致主要的功能障碍。乙状结肠憩室炎之后,很少有研究评估功能障碍和生活质量,一个多维概念,包括物理,心理和心理层面,以及社会关系。
    目的:这项工作的目的是报告目前已发表的关于乙状结肠憩室炎患者生活质量的数据。
    结果:在无并发症的乙状结肠憩室炎之后,接受抗生素治疗的患者和仅接受对症治疗的患者的长期生活质量没有显著差异.至于经历过复发事件的患者,通过择期手术,他们的生活质量似乎得到了改善.在HincheyI/II乙状结肠憩室炎之后,择期手术似乎可以提高生活质量,尽管术后并发症的风险为10%。乙状结肠憩室炎之后,虽然急诊手术对生活质量的影响似乎并不比择期手术更大,在紧急情况下采用的手术技术似乎会产生影响,特别是关于生活质量的身体和心理因素。
    结论:生活质量评估对于憩室疾病至关重要,应指导手术指征,特别是在选修的背景下。
    Diverticular disease, including diverticulitis, begins when the patient becomes symptomatic. Sigmoid diverticulitis corresponds to inflammation/infection of a diverticulum of the sigmoid colon. Among diverticulosis patients, 4.3% develop diverticulitis, a frequent pathology that can entail major functional disorders. Following sigmoid diverticulitis, few studies have assessed functional disorders and quality of life, a multidimensional concept comprising physical, psychological and mental dimensions, as well as social relations.
    The purpose of this work is to report current published data on the quality of life of patients having had sigmoid diverticulitis.
    Following uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis, long-term quality of life does not substantially differ between patients having undergone antibiotic therapy and those having only received symptomatic treatment. As for patients having experienced recurrent events, their quality of life seems improved by elective surgery. Following Hinchey I/II sigmoid diverticulitis, elective surgery seems to improve quality of life, notwithstanding a 10% risk of postoperative complications. Following sigmoid diverticulitis, while emergency surgery seems not to have greater impact on quality of life than elective surgery, the surgical technique employed in an emergency setting seems to have an impact, particularly with regard to the physical and mental components of quality of life.
    Assessment of quality of life is of fundamental importance in diverticular disease and should orient operative indications, particularly in an elective context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:在过去的十年中,在腹部急症的背景下,微创手术的扩散越来越多。然而,右结肠憩室炎仍主要通过常规开腹手术治疗。
    方法:提供了一个视频小插图,显示了紧急腹腔镜右结肠切除术的细节,该切除术用于治疗一名59岁的女性,该女性出现腹膜炎的临床症状,影像学表现提示急性右结肠憩室炎并发肝曲穿孔和十二指肠周围脓肿。我们还旨在通过荟萃分析现有的比较证据来评估腹腔镜手术与传统手术的相对结局。
    结果:共2848例患者纳入分析,其中979例患者接受了微创手术,1869例接受了常规手术。腹腔镜手术的手术时间更长,住院时间缩短。总的来说,接受腹腔镜手术的患者的发病率明显低于剖腹手术的患者,而术后死亡率无统计学差异。
    结论:根据现有文献,微创手术可改善右侧结肠憩室炎手术患者的术后结局.
    BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, there has been growing diffusion of minimally invasive surgery in the setting of abdominal emergencies. However, right-colon diverticulitis is still mainly approached by conventional celiotomy.
    METHODS: A video vignette is presented showing the details of an emergent laparoscopic right colectomy as performed to treat a 59-year-old woman who presented with clinical signs of peritonitis, and radiologic findings suggestive of acute right-colon diverticulitis complicated by perforation of the hepatic flexure and periduodenal abscess. We also aimed to evaluate the relative outcomes of laparoscopic versus conventional surgery by meta-analyzing the currently available comparative evidence on the argument.
    RESULTS: A total of 2848 patients were included in the analysis, of which 979 patients received minimally invasive surgery and 1869 had conventional surgery. Laparoscopic surgery had a longer operating time and resulted in an abbreviated hospital stay. Overall, patients receiving laparoscopy had significantly lower morbidity than those whose surgery was undertaken by laparotomy, while there was no statistically significant difference in terms of postoperative mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: According to the existing literature, minimally invasive surgery improves the postoperative outcomes of patients receiving surgery for right-sided colonic diverticulitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:我们的目的是确定憩室疾病乙状结肠切除术后憩室炎复发的发生率。
    方法:根据手术规范确定2007年1月至2021年6月连续受益于乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病的患者。根据住院代码确定并审查了复发性发作。进行生存分析并使用Kaplan-Meier曲线报告。对最后一次医院就诊和憩室炎复发进行审查。根据PRISMA声明对文献进行了系统回顾。Medline,Embase,中部,我们在WebofScience中搜索了关于乙状结肠切除术后憩室炎发生率的研究报告。该审查已注册到PROSPERO(CRD42021237003,2021年6月25日)。
    结果:一千三百五十六名患者从乙状结肠切除术中获益。400和3被排除在外,留下953名患者纳入。乙状结肠切除术时的平均年龄为64.0+/-14.7岁。458名患者(48.1%)为男性。在选择性手术中进行了62例乙状结肠切除术(65.3%),在急诊手术中进行了331例(34.7%)。平均随访时间为4.8+/-4.1年。在此期间,10例患者(1.1%)发展为复发性憩室炎。其中9次被归类为欣奇1a,一个是欣奇1b。憩室炎复发的发生率(95%CI)如下:1年:0.37%(0.12-1.13%),5年:1.07%(0.50-2.28%),10年:2.14%(1.07-4.25%),15年:2.14%(1.07-4.25%)。由于偶然病例数较少,无法通过逻辑回归评估复发的危险因素。文献的系统评价确定了15个观察性研究报告乙状结肠切除术后憩室炎复发的发生率。对于2个月至10年以上的随访期,其范围为0%至15%。
    结论:15年乙状结肠切除术后憩室炎复发的发生率为2.14%,主要由Hinchey1a发作组成。文献中报道的发病率是异质的。
    BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients who benefited from sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease from January 2007 to June 2021 were identified based on operative codes. Recurrent episodes were identified based on hospitalization codes and reviewed. Survival analysis was performed and was reported using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Follow-up was censored for last hospital visit and diverticulitis recurrence. The systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting on the incidence of diverticulitis after sigmoid colectomy. The review was registered into PROSPERO (CRD42021237003, 25/06/2021).
    RESULTS: One thousand three-hundred and fifty-six patients benefited from sigmoid colectomy. Four hundred and three were excluded, leaving 953 patients for inclusion. The mean age at time of sigmoid colectomy was 64.0 + / - 14.7 years. Four hundred and fifty-eight patients (48.1%) were males. Six hundred and twenty-two sigmoid colectomies (65.3%) were performed in the elective setting and 331 (34.7%) as emergency surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.8 + / - 4.1 years. During this period, 10 patients (1.1%) developed reccurent diverticulitis. Nine of these episodes were classified as Hinchey 1a, and one as Hinchey 1b. The incidence of diverticulitis recurrence (95% CI) was as follows: at 1 year: 0.37% (0.12-1.13%), at 5 years: 1.07% (0.50-2.28%), at 10 years: 2.14% (1.07-4.25%) and at 15 years: 2.14% (1.07-4.25%). Risk factors for recurrence could not be assessed by logistic regression due to the low number of incidental cases. The systematic review of the literature identified 15 observational studies reporting on the incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy, which ranged from 0 to 15% for a follow-up period ranging between 2 months and over 10 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy is of 2.14% at 15 years, and is mostly composed of Hinchey 1a episodes. The incidences reported in the literature are heterogeneous.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:尽管没有证据支持,但抗生素长期以来一直被推荐作为急性无并发症憩室炎患者的保守治疗形式。这项荟萃分析旨在评估急性非复杂性憩室炎患者的观察性治疗和抗生素治疗之间的结果差异。
    方法:综述了Medline和Embase电子数据库。使用随机效应模型对优势比(ORs)或平均差(MD)进行比较荟萃分析,分别。选择随机对照试验,比较观察性治疗与抗生素治疗的急性无并发症憩室炎患者的结局。感兴趣的结果包括全因死亡率,并发症,急诊手术率,逗留时间,和复发。
    结果:共7篇研究5项不同的随机对照试验。共纳入2959例急性无并发症憩室炎患者,包括1485例接受抗生素治疗的患者和1474例接受观察性治疗的患者。我们发现全因死亡率没有统计学上的显着差异(OR=0.98;95%CI0.53;1.81;p=0.68),并发症(OR=1.04;95%CI0.36;3.02;p=0.51),急诊手术(OR=1.24;95%CI0.70;2.19,p=0.92),停留时间(M.D:-0.14,95%CI-0.50;0.23,p<0.001),两组之间的复发性憩室炎(OR1.01;95%CI0.83;1.22,p<0.91)。
    结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析发现,与抗生素方案相比,接受观察性治疗的急性无并发症憩室炎患者的预后差异无统计学意义。这表明与抗生素治疗相比,观察性治疗是同样安全和有效的治疗方法。
    OBJECTIVE: Antibiotics have long been recommended as a form of conservative therapy in patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis despite no supporting evidence. This meta-analysis aims to assess the difference in outcomes between observational therapy and antibiotics regime in patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.
    METHODS: Medline and Embase electronic databases were reviewed. A comparative meta-analysis in odds ratios (ORs) or mean difference (MD) was conducted using a random effects model for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes in patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis on observational therapy compared to antibiotics regime were selected. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, complications, emergency surgery rates, length of stay, and recurrence.
    RESULTS: A total of 7 articles looking at 5 different randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 2959 patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis comprising of 1485 patients on antibiotics therapy and 1474 patients on observational therapy were included in the comparison. We found that there was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality (OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.53;1.81; p = 0.68), complications (OR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.36;3.02; p = 0.51), emergency surgery (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 0.70;2.19, p = 0.92), length of stay (M.D: -0.14, 95% CI -0.50;0.23, p < 0.001), and recurrent diverticulitis (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.83;1.22, p < 0.91) between the two arms.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systemic review and meta-analysis found that there is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis who were put on observational therapy compared to the antibiotics regime. This suggests that observational therapy is an equally safe and effective therapy as compared to antibiotics therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:传统上,国际指南建议急性憩室炎患者应在出院后6~8周进行结肠镜检查随访.然而,在计算机断层扫描(CT)的背景下,对间期结肠镜检查的需求日益受到挑战.以前的荟萃分析包括结合可疑而不是影像学证实的憩室炎的研究,并且通常与内窥镜检查结果无关。这项荟萃分析旨在调查CT证实的憩室炎患者的内镜检查结果。
    方法:Medline的电子搜索,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,Embase,CINAHL,WebofScience,Scopus,Clinicaltrials.gov和WHOICTRP的执行时间截至2021年10月18日。包括报告CT证实成人急性憩室炎的研究,并接受了结肠镜检查或软式乙状结肠镜检查的内窥镜随访。如果仅根据临床诊断憩室炎,则排除研究。超声,钡灌肠,或其他非CT形式的成像。
    结果:共纳入68项研究,共13905例患者。中位年龄为58岁,男女比例为0.84。在2.0%中检测到癌症,在3.8%中检测到晚期腺瘤。与无并发症憩室炎相比,复杂憩室炎患癌症的几率高9.2(95%CI4.42-19.08,P<0.001)。在17%中检测到腺瘤。在那些被诊断患有结直肠癌的人中,85%与CT上的憩室炎部位一致,而15%是偶然发现。
    结论:由于结直肠癌和晚期腺瘤的患病率高于人群,CT证实为急性憩室炎的患者应进行常规结肠镜检查随访。
    Traditionally, international guidelines recommend patients with acute diverticulitis should be followed up with a colonoscopy 6-8 weeks after discharge. However, the need for an interval colonoscopy has been increasingly challenged in the setting of computed tomography (CT). Previous meta-analyses have included studies which combined suspected rather than imaging confirmed diverticulitis and often without correlation with endoscopic findings. This meta-analysis aims to investigate endoscopic findings of patients with CT confirmed diverticulitis.
    An electronic search of Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP was performed up to October 18, 2021. Studies which reported CT confirmed acute diverticulitis in adults and who underwent endoscopic follow-up with either a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy were included. Studies were excluded if diverticulitis was diagnosed by clinical grounds alone, ultrasound, barium enema, or other non-CT forms of imaging.
    A total of 68 studies with 13 905 patients were included. Median age was 58 years and male to female ratio was 0.84. Cancer was detected in 2.0% and advanced adenoma in 3.8%. Complicated diverticulitis had 9.2 higher odds of cancer compared to uncomplicated diverticulitis (95% CI 4.42-19.08, P < 0.001). Adenomas were detected in 17%. Of those diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 85% were concordant with the site of the diverticulitis on CT while 15% were incidental findings.
    Routine colonoscopic follow up should be recommended in medically fit patients who have CT proven acute diverticulitis due to the higher than population prevalence of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号