Disposal

处置
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未使用的药物处置不当会对环境造成影响,造成重大的医疗保健和经济负担。虽然药品回收计划是一项有效的管理策略,其效果因国家而异。这项研究旨在系统地审查各国的收回方案,并确定需要改进方案的领域。
    我们在Medline进行了搜索,EMBASE,CINAHL,WebofScience,Scopus,和谷歌学者,从数据库开始到2023年6月。
    该综述包括15个国家/地区的27项研究。虽然有些方案,主要在美国观察到,在地方一级与非卫生相关设施进行,其他是在国家一级的医疗机构内完成的。收缴药物的费用从7,416美元到1,118,020美元不等,主要涉及与神经系统有关的药物,心血管系统,消化道,和新陈代谢。与这些计划有关的立法在美国可用,大多数欧洲国家,墨西哥,但在西班牙找不到,奥地利,澳大利亚,和新西兰。然而,尽管如此,这些国家的政府或行业管理这些计划。
    结构良好的回收计划,具有易于访问的收集点,定期收集时间表,明确的方案所有权,通过立法界定财务责任,显示出积极的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Improper disposal of unused medicine can impact the environment causing significant healthcare and financial burdens. While the medicine take-back programme is an effective management strategy, its effectiveness differs across countries. This study aimed to systematically review the take-back programmes in various countries and to identify areas needing improvement for programme enhancement.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted searches in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, from database inception to June 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: The review included 27 studies spanning 15 countries\' medicine take-back programmes. While some programmes, mostly observed in the USA, were conducted at the local level with non-health-associated facilities, others were done at the national level within healthcare facilities. The cost of collected medicines ranged from US$7,416 to US$1,118,020, primarily involving medicines related to the nervous system, cardiovascular system, alimentary tract, and metabolism. Legislations pertaining to these programmes were available in the USA, most European countries, and Mexico, but unavailable in Spain, Austria, Australia, and New Zealand. However, despite this, the government or the industry in these countries managed the programmes.
    UNASSIGNED: Well-structured take-back programmes featuring easily accessible collection points, regular collection schedules, clear programme ownership, with legislation defining financial responsibilities, showed positive outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着印度社会和医学对月经卫生的认识不断提高,对卫生巾的需求显着增加。利用高质量和环保的原材料来生产这些垫进一步支持了市场的增长。然而,随着需求和使用的改善,对适当处置技术的需求变得更加相关,因为所有这些垫子都被人体血液污染,这使得它们具有生物危害,并可能对人类健康和环境造成重大损害。一个卫生垫需要大约800年才能自然降解,而卫生垫中的塑料和超吸收聚合物(SAP)是不可生物降解的,可能需要几十年才能降解。废物管理技术,如热解,气化,可以采用资源回收来管理吨卫生废物。目前,卫生废物处理主要集中在填埋,焚化,堆肥,生物危害废物与数吨固体废物混合在一起。一次性卫生垫具有每年约5.3kgCO2当量的高碳足迹。手稿中讨论了用于卫生垫处理的创新解决方案,其中包括将衍生的废纤维素和塑料部分重新用于增值产品。系统讨论了消毒策略的未来方面以及从餐巾纸中回收的废纤维素的增值,以促进循环经济。
    With ever-improving social and medical awareness about menstrual hygiene in India, the demand for sanitary napkins has increased significantly. The utilization of high-quality and environment-friendly raw materials to produce these pads is further supporting the growth of the market. However, with improving demand and usage, the need for proper disposal techniques becomes more relevant, since all of these pads get contaminated with human blood which makes them a biohazard and can cause significant damage to human health and the environment. One sanitary pad takes around 800 years to degrade naturally and the plastic and super absorbent polymers (SAPs) in sanitary pads are non-biodegradable and can take multiple decades to degrade. Waste management technologies such as pyrolysis, gasification, and resource recovery can be adopted to manage tons of sanitary waste. Currently, sanitary waste treatment mainly focuses on landfilling, incineration, and composting, where biohazard wastes are mixed with tons of solid waste. Disposable sanitary pads have a high carbon footprint of about 5.3 kg CO2 equivalent every year. Innovative solutions for sanitary pad disposal are discussed in the manuscript which includes repurposing of derived waste cellulose and plastic fraction into value-added products. Future aspects of disinfection strategies and value addition to waste cellulose recovered from napkins were systematically discussed to promote a circular economy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    废弃口罩对环境构成严重威胁,包括自COVID-19爆发以来垃圾填埋场造成的海洋塑料污染和土壤污染风险。目前,已经报道了许多关于废弃口罩的处理和资源化利用的有效方法,包含物理,热化学,和基于溶剂的技术。至于物理技术,通过添加天然纤维或无机纳米颗粒,可以增强基于面罩的材料的机械性能,并赋予导电性或抗菌活性。关于热化学技术,催化热解可以产生相当多的氢气,这是一种环保资源,并将缓解能源危机。值得注意的是,溶剂型技术,作为一种更方便、更有效的方法,本文也考虑了这一点。这样,将面膜直接浸泡在特定的化学试剂中,改变聚丙烯的原始结构,获得多功能材料。随着可持续和通用试剂的研究,基于溶剂的技术在未来具有广阔的应用前景。这篇综述可以为利用废弃口罩资源和解决塑料污染问题提供指导。
    Waste masks pose a serious threat to the environment, including marine plastic pollution and soil pollution risks caused by landfills since the outbreak of COVID-19. Currently, numerous effective methods regarding disposal and resource utilization of waste masks have been reported, containing physical, thermochemical, and solvent-based technologies. As for physical technologies, the mechanical properties of the mask-based materials could be enhanced and the conductivity or antibacterial activity was endowed by adding natural fibers or inorganic nanoparticles. Regarding thermochemical technologies, catalytic pyrolysis could yield considerable hydrogen, which is an eco-friendly resource, and would mitigate the energy crisis. Noticeably, the solvent-based technology, as a more convenient and efficient method, was also considered in this paper. In this way, soaking the mask directly in a specific chemical reagent changes the original structure of polypropylene and obtains multi-functional materials. The solvent-based technology is promising in the future with the researches of sustainable and universally applicable reagents. This review could provide guidance for utilizing resources of waste masks and address the issues of plastic pollution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着空气的燃烧,土地和水污染,期待未来没有任何石油和天然气储备的预感导致了向回收的范式转变,任何合成聚合物的回收,并将其处理掉。其中包括塑料如聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯和聚氯乙烯。聚氨酯(PU)也在扫描仪下,以环保和可持续的方式处理或回收它。PU是目前世界上第六大使用率的聚合物,年产量近1800万吨,粗略估计PU产品的日产量超过一百万立方米。其热稳定性是其优于其它聚合物的主要原因之一。这篇评论文章讨论了当前的处置和可用于回收废PU泡沫的技术,并阐明了该领域为升级现有技术而进行的一些额外工作。有趣的是,这里提到的一些方法目前可能正在进行放大试验.目前,研究最多的是机械回收和糖酵解。但是微生物和酶处理方法可以在不久的将来转变为全面的工业回收过程。此外,我们可以看到从传统的石油来源到农业来源的原型转变。
    With the burning issue of air, land and water pollution, the premonition of looking forward towards a future devoid of any kind of oil and gas reserves has caused a paradigm shift towards recycling, recovery of any synthetic polymer and also to dispose them off environmentally. Among them are plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate and poly vinyl chloride. Polyurethane (PU) is also under the scanner to dispose of or recycle it environmentally and sustainably. PU is at present the sixth most utilized polymer all over the world with a production of nearly 18 million tonnes per annum, which roughly estimates a daily production of PU products of greater than a million of cubic metres. Its thermostable nature is one of the major reasons for its higher preference over other polymers. This review article discusses the current disposal and technologies available to recycle waste PU foams and also sheds some light on some additional work being done in the field to upgrade the existing technology. Interestingly, some methods mentioned here are probably undergoing scale-up trials runs by now. Currently, the most researched and studied ones are mechanical recycling and glycolysis. But microbial and enzymatic disposal methods can be turned into full-scale industrial recycling processes in the near future. Additionally, we can see an archetypal shift from traditional oil-based sources to the agrarian sources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    放射性碘捕获和固定不仅在反应堆运行过程中需要考虑(即,I-131),在核事故期间(即,I-131和I-129)或核燃料后处理(即,I-131和I-129),而且在处置核废料期间(即,I-129).大多数含I-129废物形式(包括乏核燃料)的处置计划都建议将其存储在地下储存库中。这里,碘可以高度移动,鉴于其放射性毒性,需要仔细管理,以最大程度地减少因处置而产生的长期环境影响。通常,任何用于从后处理或反应器中捕获碘的过程都不适合直接处置,相反,需要转化为废物形式进行处置。这些材料的目的是使用化学固定或物理包封来减少地下水对碘的浸出。最近的一些想法是设计更好地与处置概念保持一致的捕获材料,使工业加工要求更容易。对碘捕获材料和废物形式的研究已经广泛。这篇综述将作为自上次全面总结以来研究状态的更新,并根据所产生的材料化学和适用性对产生建议的碘废物形式所需的工业技术进行评估。
    Radioiodine capture and immobilization is not only important to consider during the operation of reactors (i.e., I-131), during nuclear accidents (i.e., I-131 and I-129) or nuclear fuel reprocessing (i.e., I-131 and I-129), but also during disposal of nuclear wastes (i.e., I-129). Most disposal plans for I-129-containing waste forms (including spent nuclear fuel) propose to store them in underground repositories. Here, iodine can be highly mobile and, given its radiotoxicity, needs to be carefully managed to minimize long-term environmental impacts arising from disposal. Typically, any process that has been used to capture iodine from reprocessing or in a reactor is not suitable for direct disposal, rather conversion into a wasteform for disposal is required. The objectives of these materials are to use either chemical immobilization or physical encapsulation to reduce the leaching of iodine by groundwaters. Some of the more recent ideas have been to design capture materials that better align with disposal concepts, making the industrial processing requirements easier. Research on iodine capture materials and wasteforms has been extensive. This review will act as both an update on the state of the research since the last time it was comprehensively summarized, and an evaluation of the industrial techniques required to create the proposed iodine wasteforms in terms of resulting material chemistry and applicability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    医疗废物状况是全球范围内严重的公共卫生问题。正确的医疗废物管理至关重要。然而,关于医疗废物管理的信息不足,不同国家缺乏管理。这项研究的目的是调查和评估不同国家医疗废物管理的现状。我们系统地搜索了Embase,PubMed/MEDLINE,Scopus,PubMedCentral,谷歌学者数据库,以及medRxiv使用以下关键词:医疗废物,废物管理,处置,人均医疗保健,国内生产总值(GDP),和医院。共确定了38篇合格文章。计算产生的医疗废物量之间的相关性(千克床。day-1)vs.人均GDP($)和医疗保健系统绩效排名。发现医疗废物产生率与医疗保健系统绩效排名之间呈负相关。根据这项研究的结果,不同国家的医疗废物产生率在0.14至6.10公斤床之间。第1天。大约25%的国家对医疗废物进行了隔离。约17%使用标准储存所有医疗废物。在废物收集方面也发现了缺点,storage,运输和转移,以及不同国家医疗废物管理活动的处置。只有约25%的国家同时使用三种技术,比如高压灭菌,焚化,以及用于处置和处理医疗废物的垃圾填埋场,91%采用焚烧法。这项研究强调了对特定医疗废物管理指南和法规的基本需求,技术,知识和资金,以升级全球医疗废物管理。这项研究可以认为是发展中国家和发达国家进一步研究医疗废物管理的良好指南。
    Medical waste status is a severe public health problem worldwide. Proper medical waste management is of paramount importance. However, there is insufficient information about medical waste management and lack of management in different countries. The aim of this research was to investigate and evaluate the present status of medical waste management in different countries. We systematically searched Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed Central, Google Scholar databases, as well as medRxiv using the following keywords: medical waste, waste management, disposal, healthcare per-capita generation, gross domestic product (GDP), and hospital. A total of 38 eligible articles were identified. Correlations were calculated between the amount of medical waste generated (kg bed.day-1) vs. GDP per capita ($) and ranking of healthcare system performance. A negative correlation was found between medical waste generation rate and ranking of healthcare system performance. According to the findings of this study, the medical waste generation rate in different countries ranged from 0.14 to 6.10 kg bed.day-1. About 25% of countries segregated medical waste, and about 17% used standard storage for all medical waste. Shortcomings were also found in waste collection, storage, transportation and transfer, and disposal of medical waste management activities in different countries. Only about 25% of countries simultaneously used three techniques, such as autoclaving, incineration, and landfill for disposal and treatment of medical waste, and 91% used incineration method. This study highlights an essential need for particular medical waste management guidelines and regulations, technologies, knowledge and financing to upgrade medical waste management worldwide. This study can be considered to be a good guide for further research on medical waste management in developing and developed countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    吸附是最广泛采用的,有效,和可靠的处理工艺,从废水中去除无机和有机污染物。从废水流中去除污染物的吸附处理工艺的主要问题之一是废吸附剂的回收和可持续管理。这篇综述集中在新兴吸附剂的有效性以及如何回收用过的吸附剂,再生,并通过重复使用或安全处置进一步管理。评估了常规和新兴吸附剂对废水系统中有机和无机污染物的严格分析。各种回收和再生技术的废吸附剂,包括磁分离,过滤,热解吸和分解,化学解吸,超临界流体解吸,详细讨论了高级氧化工艺和微生物辅助吸附剂再生。涵盖了吸附剂的回收和再生的当前挑战以及用于解决这些问题的方法。用过的吸附剂通过再生进行管理,以便重复使用(如土壤改良剂,电容器,催化剂/催化剂载体)或涉及焚烧和填埋的安全处置。废吸附剂的可持续管理,包括回收和再生吸附剂以供再利用的过程,在资源回收和循环经济的背景下进行研究。最后,该审查结束了当前在回收和管理废吸附剂方面的缺点,以及该系统用于工业规模应用的经济和环境可行性的未来方向。
    Adsorption is the most widely adopted, effective, and reliable treatment process for the removal of inorganic and organic contaminants from wastewater. One of the major issues with the adsorption-treatment process for the removal of contaminants from wastewater streams is the recovery and sustainable management of spent adsorbents. This review focuses on the effectiveness of emerging adsorbents and how the spent adsorbents could be recovered, regenerated, and further managed through reuse or safe disposal. The critical analysis of both conventional and emerging adsorbents on organic and inorganic contaminants in wastewater systems are evaluated. The various recovery and regeneration techniques of spent adsorbents including magnetic separation, filtration, thermal desorption and decomposition, chemical desorption, supercritical fluid desorption, advanced oxidation process and microbial assisted adsorbent regeneration are discussed in detail. The current challenges for the recovery and regeneration of adsorbents and the methodologies used for solving those problems are covered. The spent adsorbents are managed through regeneration for reuse (such as soil amendment, capacitor, catalyst/catalyst support) or safe disposal involving incineration and landfilling. Sustainable management of spent adsorbents, including processes involved in the recovery and regeneration of adsorbents for reuse, is examined in the context of resource recovery and circular economy. Finally, the review ends with the current drawbacks in the recovery and management of the spent adsorbents and the future directions for the economic and environmental feasibility of the system for industrial-scale application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Waste cooking oil (WCO) is a hazardous waste generated at staggering values globally. WCO disposal into various ecosystems, including soil and water, could result in severe environmental consequences. On the other hand, mismanagement of this hazardous waste could also be translated into the loss of resources given its energy content. Hence, finding cost-effective and eco-friendly alternative pathways for simultaneous management and valorization of WCO, such as conversion into biodiesel, has been widely sought. Due to its low toxicity, high biodegradability, renewability, and the possibility of direct use in diesel engines, biodiesel is a promising alternative to mineral diesel. However, the conventional homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysts used in the biodiesel production process, i.e., transesterification, are generally toxic and derived from non-renewable resources. Therefore, to boost the sustainability features of the process, the development of catalysts derived from renewable waste-oriented resources is of significant importance. In light of the above, the present work aims to review and critically discuss the hazardous WCO application for bioenergy production. Moreover, various waste-oriented catalysts used to valorize this waste are presented and discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界各地的核设施退役产生了大量的放射性土壤。本综述侧重于在现场一级修复放射性土壤的困难和复杂性;因此,本综述排除了实验室研究.使用基于干分离等策略的技术修复放射性土壤时面临的问题,土壤洗涤,浮选分离,热解吸,电动修复,并讨论了植物修复,以及适当的例子。各种因素,如土壤类型,颗粒大小,细颗粒的分数,强调了强烈影响放射性土壤去污过程的放射性核素特征。在这次审查中,我们还调查和比较了目前用于修复放射性核素污染土壤的可用技术库,以及使用不同技术进行土壤修复的经济方面。这篇综述证明了各种因素在确定放射性土壤去污过程有效性方面的综合作用的重要性。
    A huge amount of radioactive soil has been generated through decommissioning of nuclear facilities around the world. This review focuses on the difficulties and complexities associated with the remediation of radioactive soils at the site level; therefore, laboratory studies were excluded from this review. The problems faced while remediating radioactive soils using techniques based on strategies such as dry separation, soil washing, flotation separation, thermal desorption, electrokinetic remediation, and phytoremediation are discussed, along with appropriate examples. Various factors such as soil type, particle size, the fraction of fine particles, and radionuclide characteristics that strongly influence radioactive soil decontamination processes are highlighted. In this review, we also survey and compare the pool of available technologies currently being used for the remediation of radionuclide-contaminated soils, as well as the economic aspects of soil remediation using different techniques. This review demonstrates the importance of the integrated role of various factors in determining the effectiveness of the radioactive soil decontamination process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global emergency crisis and created waste management challenges worldwide. Such a critical point has changed solid waste (municipal and medical) management prospects and posed fact challenges to the health decision-makers and policy-makers to make decisions to ensure sustainable management of the environment. One of the most negative prospects of COVID-19 pandemic is the increased waste generation, especially plastic waste in developing and developed countries. This study systematically reviews the potential influences of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical and municipal waste, and discusses the corresponding measures and policies of solid waste management in several countries. The results show that the highest and lowest quality of final disposal is observed in Finland with 75% recycling and in India with 90% open dumping, respectively. In many countries, the medical waste showed an increase by 350-500%.The pandemic has brought particular problems to the disposal capacity of municipal waste and medical waste across the world. We think that this point of view study provides valuable data for scientists, policy makers, health decision-makers, consultants, medical staff, medical supplies, those working in public health sector, and field engineers responsible for solid waste management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号