Diagnostic criteria

诊断标准
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:ESPEN和EASO最近制定了关于节育性肥胖(SO)的共识标准,采用骨骼肌质量与重量(SMM/W)的比率。新的证据表明,根据体重指数(SMM/BMI)调整骨骼肌质量可以提高健康结果的预测准确性。我们旨在验证ESPEN/EASO标准,并探讨SMM/BMI调整在预测中国西部老年人跌倒中的潜在益处。
    方法:我们进行了多中心,横断面研究,包括社区居住的老年人。使用标准的ESPEN/EASO共识标准(SOESPEN)和调整SMM/BMI的修改版本(SOESPEN-M)确定SO的诊断。SOESPEN协会,SOESPEN-M,并分析了它们与跌倒的成分。
    结果:在1353名参与者中,SO的患病率为13.2%(SOESPEN)和11.4%(SOESPEN-M),随着年龄和较高的BMI水平而增加。在BMI正常的参与者中,4.2%和6.2%被发现有SOESPEN和SOESPEN-M,分别。SMM/W和SMM/BMI与跌倒风险呈负相关(分别为p=0.042和p=0.021)。在调整混杂因素后,只有SOESPEN与跌倒显着相关(优势比[OR]1.61,95%置信区间[CI]1.08至2.40),而SOESPEN-M的关联没有达到显著性(OR1.55,95%CI0.99~2.43).
    结论:这项研究在中国西部社区居住的老年人中验证了ESPEN/EASO标准(SOESPEN)及其修改版本(SOESPEN-M)。SMM/BMI调整似乎提供了对SO患病率的较低估计,只有SOESPEN显示与跌倒有显著关联。
    OBJECTIVE: The ESPEN and the EASO recently developed consensus criteria for sarcopenic obesity (SO), employing the skeletal muscle mass to weight (SMM/W) ratio. Emerging evidence suggests that adjusting skeletal muscle mass for body mass index (SMM/BMI) could enhance the predictive accuracy for health outcomes. We aimed to validate the ESPEN/EASO criteria and explore the potential benefits of the SMM/BMI adjustment in predicting falls among older adults in Western China.
    METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study and included community-dwelling older adults. The diagnosis of SO was determined using the standard ESPEN/EASO consensus criteria (SOESPEN) and a modified version adjusting SMM/BMI (SOESPEN-M). The associations of SOESPEN, SOESPEN-M, and their components with falls were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Among the 1353 participants, the prevalence of SO was 13.2 % (SOESPEN) and 11.4 % (SOESPEN-M), which increased with age and higher BMI levels. Within participants with a normal BMI, 4.2 % and 6.2 % were found to have SOESPEN and SOESPEN-M, respectively. SMM/W and SMM/BMI negatively correlated with fall risk (p=0.042 and p=0.021, respectively). Upon adjusting for confounders, only SOESPEN was significantly associated with falls (odds ratios [OR] 1.61, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 2.40), whereas the association for SOESPEN-M did not achieve significance (OR 1.55, 95 % CI 0.99 to 2.43).
    CONCLUSIONS: This research validated the ESPEN/EASO criteria (SOESPEN) and their modified version (SOESPEN-M) among community-dwelling older adults in Western China. The SMM/BMI adjustment appears to offer a lower estimate of SO prevalence, with only SOESPEN showing a significant association with falls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:作为一个人口大国,中国发布了大量的诊断标准。然而,尚未对已发表的诊断标准进行系统分析.因此,这项研究的目的是调查这些特征,开发方法,报告质量,以及中国公布的诊断标准的证据基础。
    方法:从开始到2023年7月31日,我们搜索了五个数据库的诊断标准。通过摘要全文阅读筛选所有诊断标准,如果满足预定标准,则包括在内。两名研究人员独立提取了特征数据,开发方法,报告质量,和诊断标准的证据基础。
    结果:共纳入143项诊断标准。在开发方法方面,涉及系统文献检索的诊断标准比例(n=2;1.4%;95%置信区间(CI),0.4%至5.0%),采用正式共识方法(n=4;2.8%;95%CI,1.1%至7.0%),和标准验证(n=9;6.3%;95%CI,3.3%至11.5%)相对较低。关于报告质量,对ACCORD检查表的平均依从性为5.1%;没有任何诊断标准在注册时报告,专家入选标准,专家招聘流程,或共识结果。大多数标准(58.7%;95%CI,50.6%至66.5%)没有引用任何研究,只有一项(0.7%;95%CI,0.1%~3.9%)标准来自系统评价.此外,只有16.1%(95%CI,11.0%~23.0%)的诊断标准使用了来自中国人群的证据.
    结论:中国制定的诊断标准存在严重缺陷,特别是在证据检索中,组建专家小组,共识方法,和验证。此外,只有少数诊断标准使用了来自中国的证据或证据的系统综合。迫切需要加强制定诊断标准的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: As a large and populous country, China releases a high number of diagnostic criteria. However, the published diagnostic criteria have not yet been systematically analyzed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics, development methods, reporting quality, and evidence basis of diagnostic criteria published in China.
    METHODS: We searched five databases for diagnostic criteria from their inception until July 31, 2023. All diagnostic criteria were screened through abstract and full-text reading, and included if satisfying the prespecified criteria. Two researchers independently extracted data on the characteristics, development methods, reporting quality, and evidence basis of diagnostic criteria.
    RESULTS: A total of 143 diagnostic criteria were included. In terms of development methods, the proportions of diagnostic criteria that involved a systematic literature search (n = 2; 1.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4% to 5.0%), adoption of formal consensus methods (n = 4; 2.8%; 95% CI, 1.1% to 7.0%), and criteria validation (n = 9; 6.3%; 95% CI, 3.3% to 11.5%) were relatively low. Regarding reporting quality, the average compliance with the ACCORD checklist was 5.1%; none of the diagnostic criteria reported on registration, expert inclusion criteria, expert recruitment process, or consensus results. A majority (58.7%; 95% CI, 50.6% to 66.5%) of criteria did not cite any research, and only one (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 3.9%) criterion was derived from a systematic review. Moreover, only 16.1% (95% CI, 11.0% to 23.0%) of diagnostic criteria used evidence from the Chinese population.
    CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic criteria developed in China exhibit serious flaws, particularly in evidence retrieval, formation of expert panels, consensus methods, and validation. Additionally, only few diagnostic criteria used a systematic synthesis of the evidence or evidence from the China. There is an urgent need to enhance the methodology for developing diagnostic criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)肠炎是一种在施用抗菌药物后MRSA在肠道中异常生长的病症,导致肠炎.在粪便培养试验中检测到的MRSA患者通常被诊断为MSRA肠炎。然而,诊断标准仍然存在不确定性;因此,我们进行了流行病学研究来定义这些病例.
    在2012年4月1日至2022年12月31日期间入住高知医学院医院48小时后使用选择性培养基检测MRSA阳性且不符合排除标准的患者纳入研究。我们将MRSA肠炎(A组)定义为对盐酸万古霉素粉治疗有反应的病例,布里斯托尔粪便评分≥5,每天至少3次大便频率;所有其他均为MRSA携带者(B组)。对MRSA肠炎的相关危险因素进行多因素分析。
    A组和B组包括18例(25.4%)和53例(74.6%)患者,分别。多因素logistic回归分析显示白细胞计数>10000/µL(比值比[OR],5.50;95%置信区间[CI],1.12-26.9),粪便培养中MRSA计数≥2+(OR,8.91;95%CI,1.79-44.3),并在粪便标本提交后1个月内给予美罗培南(OR,7.47;95%CI,1.66-33.6)是MRSA肠炎的危险因素。
    对MRSA肠炎的病例定义进行审查可能是有用的诊断标准。
    UNASSIGNED: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) enteritis is a condition in which MRSA grows abnormally in the intestine after administration of antimicrobial agents, resulting in enteritis. Patients with MRSA detected in stool culture tests are often diagnosed with MSRA enteritis. However, uncertainty remains in the diagnostic criteria; therefore, we conducted epidemiological studies to define these cases.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who tested positive for MRSA by stool culture using selective media 48 h after admission to Kochi Medical School Hospital between April 1, 2012, and December 31, 2022, and did not meet the exclusion criteria were included. We defined MRSA enteritis (Group A) as cases that were responsive to treatment with vancomycin hydrochloride powder, had a Bristol Stool Scale of ≥ 5, and a stool frequency of at least three times per day; all others were MRSA carriers (Group B). Multivariate analysis was performed to risk factors associated with MRSA enteritis.
    UNASSIGNED: Groups A and B included 18 (25.4%) and 53 (74.6%) patients, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a white blood cell count of > 10000/µL (odds ratio [OR], 5.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-26.9), MRSA count of ≥ 2+ in stool cultures (OR, 8.91; 95% CI, 1.79-44.3), and meropenem administration within 1 month of stool specimen submission (OR, 7.47; 95% CI, 1.66-33.6) were risk factors of MRSA enteritis.
    UNASSIGNED: The case definitions reviewed for MRSA enteritis may be useful as diagnostic criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组(EWGSOP)提出了两个诊断肌肉减少症的关键建议:2010年的EWGSOP1和2019年的EWGSOP2。这些建议是目前最广泛使用的诊断肌少症的指南。然而,基于EWGSOP标准的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者肌肉减少症患病率的数据有限.本研究旨在:(a)使用EWGSOP1和EWGSOP2标准确定西班牙老年RA女性队列中的肌肉减少症患病率;(b)评估SARC-F问卷检测肌肉减少症的有效性。
    在这次观测中,横断面研究,67名年龄在65岁以上且符合ACR2010RA标准的女性从一所三级大学医院连续招募。评估包括:(a)人口统计学和人体测量数据;(b)RA相关变量(疾病史,分析评估,活动,残疾,生活质量);和(C)肌肉减少症相关变量(肌肉力量,步态速度,骨骼肌质量,和SARC-F问卷)。使用EWGSOP1和EWGSOP2标准确定肌肉减少症的患病率。此外,计算SARC-F问卷检测肌肉减少症的有效性.
    根据EWGSOP1标准,肌肉减少症的患病率为43%,根据EWGSOP2标准为16%。根据后一种标准诊断为肌肉减少症的患者也符合EWGSOP1的肌肉减少症标准。两组EWGSOP标准之间的协议很差。根据EWGSOP2标准,SARC-F问卷显示出固有的高灵敏度(100%)以及良好的特异性(75%)和诊断准确性(79%)。
    西班牙老年RA女性的肌少症患病率根据是否应用EWGSOP1或EWGSOP2标准而有显著差异。SARC-F问卷与EWGSOP2标准结合使用时可有效预测肌肉减少症,这是目前临床实践中最被接受的标准。
    UNASSIGNED: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) has put forward two key proposals for diagnosing sarcopenia: the EWGSOP1 in 2010 and the EWGSOP2 in 2019. These proposals are currently the most widely used guidelines for diagnosing sarcopenia. However, data on the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on EWGSOP criteria are limited. This study aimed to: (a) establish the prevalence of sarcopenia in an elderly Spanish cohort of women with RA using both EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 criteria; and (b) evaluate the effectiveness of the SARC-F questionnaire in detecting sarcopenia.
    UNASSIGNED: In this observational, cross-sectional study, 67 women aged over 65 years who met the ACR 2010 criteria for RA were consecutively recruited from a tertiary university hospital. Assessments included: (a) demographic and anthropometric data; (b) RA-related variables (disease history, analytical evaluation, activity, disability, quality of life); and (c) sarcopenia-related variables (muscle strength, gait speed, skeletal muscle mass, and SARC-F questionnaire). The prevalence of sarcopenia was determined using both EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 criteria. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the SARC-F questionnaire for detecting sarcopenia were calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 43% according to the EWGSOP1 criteria and 16% according to the EWGSOP2 criteria. Patients diagnosed with sarcopenia based on the latter criteria also met the EWGSOP1\'s criteria for sarcopenia. Agreement between the two sets of EWGSOP criteria was poor. The SARC-F questionnaire demonstrated an inherently high sensitivity (100%) as well as good specificity (75%) and diagnostic accuracy (79%) in detecting sarcopenia according to EWGSOP2 criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: The prevalence rate of sarcopenia among elderly Spanish women with RA varies significantly depending on whether EWGSOP1 or EWGSOP2 criteria are applied. The SARC-F questionnaire is effective for predicting sarcopenia when used in conjunction with the EWGSOP2 criteria, which is currently the most accepted standard in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:再摄食综合征(RFS)缺乏全球定义和诊断标准。使用不同的诊断标准;血清磷酸盐(传统标准(TC)),弗里德里共识建议,还有ASPEN.我们使用这三种不同的诊断标准调查了老年住院患者RFS的发生率以及有或没有RFS的患者的死亡率。
    方法:这是一项纵向研究,数据来源于2017年3月至2019年8月进行的一项随机对照试验。根据美国国家健康与临床卓越研究所的工具,共有85名营养不良的住院患者面临RFS风险,包括在内。所有患者均接受肠内导管喂养,在干预期间每天测量电解质。Friedli和ASPEN包括磷酸盐,镁,和钾的定义,但使用了不同的截止值。事件被记录,和Kaplan-Meier估计用于确定RFS患者的死亡率是否更普遍.回归分析用于检验RFS与死亡之间关联的混杂因素,和Kappa用于检验三个诊断标准之间的一致性。
    结果:患者的平均(SD)年龄为79.8(7.4)岁,BMI平均值(SD)为18.5(3.4)kg/m2。平均(SD)kcal/kg/天在第1天为19(11),在第7天为26(15)。RFS的发生率与使用的标准不同;12.9%(TC),31.8%(弗里德利),和65.9%(ASPEN)。死亡率很高,36.5%(n=31)和56.5%(n=48)的患者在三个月和一年的随访中死亡,分别。在TC中,8/11(72.7%)与RFS40/74(54.1%)没有RFS在一年内死亡,在Friedli15/27(55.5%)与RFS33/58(56.9%)没有RFS死亡,在使用RFS的ASPEN32/56(65.9%)中,vs.16/29(55.2%)无RFS在一年内死亡。无论使用哪种标准,有或没有RFS的患者之间的死亡率都没有统计学上的显着差异。年龄是与一年死亡相关的唯一变量。Kappa分析显示类别之间的一致性非常低。
    结论:我们的结果表明,使用不同的诊断标准显著影响发病率。然而,不管使用什么标准,与无RFS的患者相比,有RFS的患者组的死亡率没有显著升高.此外,没有一项标准显示与1年死亡有显著关联.这支持对RFS的全球统一诊断标准的需要。本研究在ClinicalTrials.gov中注册(标识符NCT0314141489)。
    OBJECTIVE: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) lacks both a global definition and diagnostic criteria. Different diagnostic criteria are used; serum phosphate (traditional criterion (TC)), the Friedli consensus recommendations, and the ASPEN. We investigated the incidence of RFS in older hospitalized patients and the mortality rates in patients with or without RFS using these three different diagnostic criteria.
    METHODS: This is a longitudinal study with data originating from a randomized controlled trial conducted between March 2017 and August 2019. A total of 85 malnourished hospitalized patients at risk of RFS according to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence tool for detecting patients at risk of RFS, were included. All patients were provided with enteral tube feeding, and electrolytes were measured daily during the intervention period. Friedli and ASPEN included phosphate, magnesium, and potassium in their definitions, but used different cut-off values. Incidences were recorded, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine whether mortality was more prevalent in patients with RFS. Regression analysis was used to test for confounders regarding the association between RFS and death, and Kappa was used to test for agreement between the three diagnostic criteria.
    RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 79.8 (7.4) years, and the mean (SD) BMI was 18.5 (3.4) kg/m2. The mean (SD) kcal/kg/day was 19 (11) on day one and 26 (15) on day seven. The incidences of RFS differed with the criteria used; 12.9% (TC), 31.8% (Friedli), and 65.9% (ASPEN). Mortality was high, with 36.5% (n = 31) and 56.5% (n = 48) of patients dead at three-month and one-year follow-up, respectively. In the TC, 8/11 (72.7%) with RFS vs. 40/74 (54.1%) without RFS died within one-year, in Friedli 15/27 (55.5%) with RFS vs. 33/58 (56.9%) without RFS died, and in ASPEN 32/56 (65.9%) with RFS, vs. 16/29 (55.2%) without RFS died within one-year. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between patients with or without RFS regardless of which criteria were used. Age was the only variable associated with death at one-year. The Kappa analysis showed very low agreement between the categories.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using different diagnostic criteria significantly impacts incidence rates. However, regardless of criteria used, the mortality was not significantly higher in the group of patients with RFS compared to the patients without RFS. Furthermore, none of the criteria showed a significant association with death at one-year. This supports the need for a global unified diagnostic criterion for RFS. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03141489).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)是一种多面性疾病,具有强烈的女性偏好。它的特点是慢性广泛性疼痛,睡眠-觉醒障碍,疲劳,认知障碍,还有其他一些躯体症状.材料和方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们分析了302名患者的数据,这些患者被转诊到我们的疼痛中心进行首次临床评估评估,然后接受了基于医师的2016年修订的ACRFMS诊断标准的检查。不管疼痛治疗师先前做出的最终诊断。结果:在280名坚持2016年ACR问卷的患者中,20.3%的FMS诊断标准为阳性。疼痛临床医生做出的FMS出院诊断与ACR2016标准阳性之间的一致性水平中等(kappa=0.599,中等一致性设置为kappa值为0.6)。只有四名患者(1.7%)在出院时被诊断为患有FMS,不符合2016ACR的最低诊断标准。结论:这项前瞻性观察性研究证实了FMS的诊断挑战,出院时FMS诊断与2016年ACR标准阳性之间的中度一致性证明了这一点。在我们看来,广泛接受的诊断指南的使用应在临床情景中实施,并且应成为评估和治疗报告广泛疼痛和FMS提示症状的患者的临床医生的共同语言.进一步的方法学更强的研究将是必要的,以验证我们的观察。
    Background and Objectives: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a multifaceted disease with a strong preference for the female sex. It is characterised by chronic widespread pain, sleep-wake disorders, fatigue, cognitive disturbances, and several other somatic symptoms. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study, we analysed data regarding 302 patients who were referred to our pain centre for a first clinical assessment evaluation and were then inspected for the physician-based 2016 revision of the ACR diagnostic criteria for FMS, regardless of the final diagnosis previously made by the pain therapist. Results: Among the 280 patients who adhered to the 2016 ACR questionnaire, 20.3% displayed positive criteria for FMS diagnosis. The level of agreement between the FMS discharge diagnosis made by the pain clinician and the ACR 2016 criteria-positivity was moderate (kappa = 0.599, with moderate agreement set at a kappa value of 0.6). Only four patients (1.7%) diagnosed as suffering from FMS at discharge did not satisfy the minimal 2016 ACR diagnostic criteria. Conclusions: This prospective observational study confirmed the diagnostic challenge with FMS, as demonstrated by the moderate grade of agreement between the FMS diagnosis at discharge and the positivity for 2016 ACR criteria. In our opinion, the use of widely accepted diagnostic guidelines should be implemented in clinical scenarios and should become a common language among clinicians who evaluate and treat patients reporting widespread pain and FMS-suggestive symptoms. Further methodologically stronger studies will be necessary to validate our observation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的视神经炎诊断标准包括T2-视神经高强度(ON),即使没有相关的对比度增强。然而,孤立的ON-T2-高强度是在任何视神经病变或严重视网膜病变中发现的非特异性发现。我们将2022年视神经炎诊断标准应用于至少一只眼睛患有非炎性视神经病变和ON-T2高强度的患者队列,使用这些标准评估视神经炎的误诊率。
    方法:回顾性研究连续患者在2019年7月1日至2022年6月30日期间接受脑/眼眶MRI检查,有无对比。包括至少一只眼睛中具有ON-T2-高强度的患者。2022年视神经炎诊断标准适用于接受眼科检查的非炎性视神经病变患者。
    结果:包括150名患者,85/150患有压缩性视神经病变;32/150患有青光眼;12/150患有乳头水肿;8/150患有遗传性(3),辐射诱导(3),营养(1),外伤性(1)视神经病变(均未符合标准);13/150患有缺血性视神经病变,由于ON头部的对比增强,4例符合明确的视神经炎标准。如果忽略了替代诊断的危险信号,则另外7名患者将满足诊断标准。
    结论:将2022年视神经炎诊断标准应用于非炎性视神经病变和至少一次ON中的ON-T2-高强度的患者,导致仅4例因ON头部增强而误诊为视神经炎,均为非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变。在我们的研究中,神经眼科评估和排除ON头作为MRI标准中的位置可以防止视神经炎的误诊。
    BACKGROUND: Recent diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis include T2-hyperintensity of the optic nerve (ON), even without associated contrast enhancement. However, isolated ON-T2-hyperintensity is a nonspecific finding found in any optic neuropathy or severe retinopathy. We applied the 2022 optic neuritis diagnostic criteria to a cohort of patients with noninflammatory optic neuropathy and ON-T2-hyperintensity in at least one eye, to assess the rate of optic neuritis misdiagnosis using these criteria.
    METHODS: Retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent brain/orbit MRI with/without contrast between 07/01/2019 and 06/30/2022. Patients with ON-T2-hyperintensity in at least one eye were included. The 2022 optic neuritis diagnostic criteria were applied to patients with noninflammatory optic neuropathies who had an ophthalmologic examination available for review.
    RESULTS: Of 150 patients included, 85/150 had compressive optic neuropathy; 32/150 had glaucoma; 12/150 had papilledema; 8/150 had hereditary (3), radiation-induced (3), nutritional (1), traumatic (1) optic neuropathies (none fulfilled the criteria); 13/150 had ischemic optic neuropathy and 4 fulfilled the criteria as definite optic neuritis due to contrast enhancement of the ON head. Seven additional patients would have satisfied the diagnostic criteria if red flags for alternative diagnoses had been overlooked.
    CONCLUSIONS: The application of the 2022 optic neuritis diagnostic criteria in patients with noninflammatory optic neuropathy and ON-T2-hyperintensity in at least one ON resulted in misdiagnosis of optic neuritis in only 4 patients because of ON head enhancement, all with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation and exclusion of the ON head as a location in the MRI criteria would have prevented optic neuritis misdiagnosis in our study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头发直径多样性(HDD)的常规20%阈值,被广泛接受用于诊断顶点区域的雄激素性脱发(AGA),没有进行定量分析。
    要验证AGA的HDD20%阈值,并开发完善的,韩国特有的标准。
    这项研究涉及240名男性AGA患者,按V阶段的基本分类和具体分类。使用用于毛发厚度测量的ImageJ软件分析顶点区域的图图像。
    接收器工作特性曲线分析确定了45μm头发直径阈值是对AGA的最诊断性,曲线下面积值为0.884,Youden指数为0.659。当超过21%的头发直径≤45μm时,可实现最佳的AGA诊断。
    对韩国男性的限制限制了其对更广泛人群的适用性,并且使用特定的毛发直径阈值不考虑毛发特征的个体差异。
    该研究验证了常规HDD的20%阈值,并为韩国男性提出了更合适的45μm阈值,超过40μm。它的结论是,虽然HDD20%仍然是早期检测顶点AGA的关键方法,稀疏头发的定义应该是特定种族的。
    UNASSIGNED: The conventional 20% threshold for hair diameter diversity (HDD), widely accepted for diagnosing androgenetic alopecia (AGA) in the vertex area, has not quantitatively analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: To validate the HDD 20% threshold for AGA and develop a refined, Korean-specific criterion.
    UNASSIGNED: This study involved 240 male patients with AGA, categorized by the V stages of the basic and specific classification. Phototrichogram images of the vertex region were analyzed using Image J software for hair thickness measurement.
    UNASSIGNED: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the 45 μm hair diameter threshold as the most diagnostic for AGA, with an area under the curve value of 0.884 and a Youden index of 0.659. Optimal AGA diagnosis was achieved when over 21% of hair had a diameter of ≤45 μm.
    UNASSIGNED: Restriction to Korean male limits its applicability to a broader population, and using a specific hair diameter threshold does not account for individual variations in hair characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: The study validates the conventional HDD 20% threshold and proposes a more appropriate 45 μm threshold for Korean males, beyond the 40 μm. It concludes that while the HDD 20% remains a key method for early detection of vertex AGA, the definition of thin hair should be ethnicity-specific.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Congress
    自2013年欧洲神经肌肉中心(ENMC)包涵体肌炎(IBM)诊断标准发布以来,关于IBM流行病学已经取得了一些进展,发病机制,诊断工具,和临床试验准备。新的诊断工具包括肌肉成像技术,如MRI和超声,和胞质5'-核苷酸酶-1A抗体的血清学检测。第272届ENMC研讨会旨在开发新的诊断标准,讨论临床结果测量和临床试验准备。研讨会从患者代表开始,强调了一些未研究的症状以及及时诊断的冲动。随后是IBM专家的演讲,重点介绍了该领域的新发展。这份报告由两部分组成,第一部分提供达成共识的新诊断标准.第二部分重点介绍了结果测量在临床实践和临床试验中的应用,强调当前的局限性,并概述未来研究的目标。
    Since the publication of the 2013 European Neuromuscular Center (ENMC) diagnostic criteria for Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM), several advances have been made regarding IBM epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic tools, and clinical trial readiness. Novel diagnostic tools include muscle imaging techniques such as MRI and ultrasound, and serological testing for cytosolic 5\'-nucleotidase-1A antibodies. The 272nd ENMC workshop aimed to develop new diagnostic criteria, discuss clinical outcome measures and clinical trial readiness. The workshop started with patient representatives highlighting several understudied symptoms and the urge for a timely diagnosis. This was followed by presentations from IBM experts highlighting the new developments in the field. This report is composed of two parts, the first part providing new diagnostic criteria on which consensus was achieved. The second part focuses on the use of outcome measures in clinical practice and clinical trials, highlighting current limitations and outlining the goals for future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    BACKGROUND: ICD-11 presents narrowed criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and introduces complex PTSD (CPTSD) with additional difficulties in self-organization (DSO). These changes can have significant effects on the frequency of the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate which ICD-11 symptom clusters cause children and adolescents to miss the diagnosis and whether caregivers are more likely to attribute changes in DSO to developmental level or to the traumatic event, and how these attributions are in turn related to symptom severity.
    METHODS: N = 88 German-speaking children and adolescents (age: 7-17 years) after traumatic events and N = 79 caregivers participated between September 2019 and November 2020 in a survey on PTSD symptom severity (CATS-2) and attribution of DSO symptoms (caregiver questionnaire).
    RESULTS: The ICD-11 criteria (CATS‑2 and a developmentally adapted version) showed lower frequency rates for PTSD as compared to DSM‑5 and ICD-10. The ICD-11 clusters re-experiencing and hyperarousal were met the least often. Changes in DSO symptoms were predominantly rated as event-related. This attribution was associated with higher PTSD and DSO symptom severity in caregiver reports. The age-related attribution was associated with higher DSO-symptom severity, but not PTSD symptom severity in caregiver reports.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the context of the diagnostic process and the revision of diagnostic instruments for ICD-11 (C)PTSD, development-specific symptoms should be taken into account. The trauma-related differentiation of DSO symptom changes as compared to development-related fluctuations is challenging and therefore requires several sources of information.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Die in der ICD-11 enger gefassten Kriterien der posttraumatischen Belastungsstörung (PTBS) und die Einführung der komplexen PTBS (kPTBS) mit zusätzlichen Schwierigkeiten in der Selbstorganisation und -regulation (SSO) können deutliche Auswirkungen auf die Diagnosehäufigkeit haben. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde untersucht, aufgrund welcher ICD-11-Cluster Kinder und Jugendliche die Diagnose verfehlen und ob Bezugspersonen Veränderungen im SSO-Bereich eher auf den Entwicklungsstand oder das traumatische Ereignis attribuieren und wie diese Attributionen wiederum mit der Symptomschwere zusammenhängen.
    METHODS: N = 88 deutschsprachige Kinder und Jugendliche (Alter: 7–17) mit traumatischen Ereignissen sowie N = 79 Bezugspersonen wurden zwischen September 2019 und November 2020 zur (k)PTBS-Symptomschwere (CATS-2) und der Attribution der SSO-Symptome (Fragebogen für Bezugspersonen) befragt.
    UNASSIGNED: Die ICD-11-Kriterien (CATS‑2 und eine entwicklungsangepasste Version) ergaben geringere Häufigkeitsraten der PTBS als DSM‑5 und ICD-10. Am seltensten wurden die ICD-11-Cluster „Wiedererleben“ und „Übererregung“ erfüllt. Veränderungen der SSO-Symptome wurden vorwiegend als ereignisbedingt eingeschätzt. Diese Attribution hing mit höherer PTBS- und SSO-Symptomschwere im Fremdbericht zusammen. Die entwicklungsbedingte Attribution hing mit einer höheren SSO-, jedoch nicht PTBS-Symptomschwere im Fremdbericht zusammen.
    CONCLUSIONS: Im Rahmen der Diagnostik und bei der Überarbeitung von Diagnoseinstrumenten für ICD-11-(k)PTBS sollten auch entwicklungsspezifische Symptomausprägungen berücksichtigt werden. Eine Herausforderung stellt die Abgrenzung von Veränderungen im SSO-Bereich als „traumabezogen“ gegenüber „entwicklungsbedingt“ dar und erfordert mehrere Informationsquellen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号