BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a condition where there is an abnormal relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum. DDH is prevalent in Jordan, where late presentations of complicated cases are common due to the absence of a national screening program and cultural behaviors that can exacerbate DDH progression. The study aims to prove that the absence of a nationwide screening program and low awareness of the population about DDH are the primary reasons for the high incidence of late-presenting DDH in Jordan. The study highlights the need for addressing modifiable risk factors like swaddling and correcting common misconceptions such as using multiple diapers as a treatment option.
METHODS: The cross-sectional study evaluated the awareness level of DDH among Jordan residents above the age of 18. An online questionnaire was used, containing two sections. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the level of awareness scores according to demographic variables and cultural norms such as tight swaddling and using multiple diapers. The sample was categorized into three groups based on their scores: low awareness (0-4), moderate awareness (5-8), and high awareness (9-12).
RESULTS: The study included 1013 participants. The results indicated that 48.9% had moderate awareness, 37.8% had low awareness, and 13.3% had high awareness of DDH. Gender and place of residence had no significant relationship with the level of awareness. However, the majority of participants with high and moderate levels of awareness were in the 25-40 years age group, and healthcare workers had the highest levels of awareness. The study showed that 33.9% of participants gained their knowledge from either relatives or self-experience, while awareness campaigns were the least assessed source of information with only 2.9% of participants getting their information from them. The study also revealed misconceptions regarding DDH, such as the belief that tight swaddling and wearing many diapers reduced the risk of developing DDH. Additionally, about half of the participants were unaware of the presence of screening guidelines for DDH.
CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores the urgent need to establish a national screening program and awareness campaigns to increase knowledge about DDH and prevent late presentations of complicated cases in Jordan. The study findings provide essential information for the development of future DDH campaigns and screening protocols.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective was to report our early results after a one-stage procedure [open reduction (OR), Dega pelvic osteotomy (DPO), and femoral osteotomy (FO) when needed] for surgical management of a cohort of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The secondary objective was to compare the functional, radiological, and complications among patients younger and older than 30 months.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 71 hips with DDH in 61 patients with a mean age of 34.3 ± 19.5 months. All patients underwent one-stage surgical procedures, including OR + DPO and FO, if needed. Functional and radiographic assessment at the last follow-up was conducted using the modified Severin grading system and the Severin classification system, respectively, in addition to assessing the acetabular index (AI), osteotomies healing, and presence of complications. We divided patients into two groups, younger than 30 months (group I) and older than 30 months (group II).
RESULTS: We included 35 hips in group I and 36 in group II. All hips received OR + DPO, while 25 (69.4%) hips in group II had FO. The operative time was significantly longer in group II (103.19 ± 20.74 versus 72.43 ± 11.59 min, p < 0.001). After a mean follow up of 21.3 ± 2.3 months, the functional outcomes were satisfactory in 62 (87.3%) hips (94.3% in group I and 80.6% in group II, p = 0.35). There was a significant improvement in the AI in all patients compared with preoperative values (27.2° ± 2.9 versus 37° ± 4.2, p < 0.05). Furthermore, 63 (88.7%) hips had satisfactory radiographic outcomes (94.3% in group I and 83.3% in group II, p = 0.26), and all osteotomies showed radiographic healing. The overall complications incidence was significantly lower in group I compared with group II (5.7% versus 30.6%, p < 0.05), and avascular necrosis occurred in 4 (5.6%) hips, all in group II (p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: One-stage procedure entailing open reduction, Dega pelvic osteotomy, and femoral osteotomy when needed for managing DDH in patients younger than eight years old revealed acceptable clinical and radiological outcomes. However, there was a higher need for a concomitant femoral osteotomy in patients older than 2.5 years, and complications were more frequent.
METHODS:

UNASSIGNED: Hip spica tables are widely used among pediatric orthopedic surgeons to maintain the hip position during cast application and drying processes for a better outcome. Locally customized spica tables can be a significant concern if their limitations significantly interfere with the quality of care.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to explore the current practice of pediatric hip spica table application among hospitals in the GCC countries and report comprehensive data that help surgeons enhance their practice.
UNASSIGNED: This is a cross-sectional study on pediatric orthopedic surgeons using a self-administered Online Questionnaire. The respondents were grouped as those using locally customized tables, where further information about the material and characteristics were collected, and those using company manufactured tables. Both groups answered analytical questions related to their current practice of hip spica tables.
UNASSIGNED: Sixty-three surgeons completed the survey. More than half the physicians in this study are using locally customized spica tables (n= 41, 65%). Compared to company-manufactured tables, locally customized tables were associated with a higher rate of difficulties when taking an X-ray, when the patient weighs more than 50.0 kg, and with anesthesia, although not statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: Obtaining a good quality spica table at a suitable price is a primary obstacle pediatric orthopedic surgeons face. This study shows no statistically significant difference between locally customized and company-manufactured tables regarding the outcomes and that spica tables have room for development to optimize their utilization.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is one of the most common pediatric orthopedic disorders, affecting 1-3% of all newborns. The optimal treatment of centered DDH is currently under debate. This randomized controlled trial aims to study the (cost-)effectiveness of active monitoring versus abduction treatment for infants with centered DDH.
This is a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial studying the (cost-)effectiveness of active monitoring versus abduction treatment for infants with centered DDH in fourteen hospitals in the Netherlands. In total, 800 infants with centered DDH (Graf IIa-/IIb/IIc), aged 10-16 weeks, will be randomly allocated to the active monitoring or abduction treatment group. Infants will be followed up until the age of 24 months. The primary outcome is the rate of normal hips, defined as an acetabular index lower than 25 degrees on an antero-posterior radiograph, at the age of 12 months. Secondary outcomes are the rate of normal hips at the age of 24 months, complications, time to hip normalization, the relation between baseline patient characteristics and the rate of normal hips, compliance, costs, cost-effectiveness, budget impact, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the infant, HRQoL of the parents/caregivers, and parent/caregiver satisfaction with the treatment protocol.
The outcomes of this randomized controlled trial will contribute to improving current care-as-usual for infants with centered DDH.
Dutch Trial Register, NL9714, registered September 6, 2021. https://clinicaltrialregister.nl/en/trial/29596.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and determine the values of radiological parameters that would allow us to obtain an optimal clinical result. Radiological evaluation included determining the center-edge angle (CEA), medialization, distalization, femoral head coverage (FHC), and ilioischial angle as measured on a standardized AP radiograph of the hip joints. Clinical evaluation was based on the HHS, WOMAC, Merle d\'Aubigne-Postel scales and Hip Lag Sign. The results of PAO presented decreased medialization (mean 3.4 mm), distalization (mean 3.5 mm), and ilioischial angle (mean 2.7°); improvement in femoral head bone cover; an increased CEA (mean 16.3°) and FHC (mean 15.2%); clinically increased HHS (mean 22 points) and M. Postel-d\'Aubigne (mean 3.5 points) scores; and a decrease in WOMAC (mean 24%). HLS improved in 67% of patients after surgery. Qualification of patients with DDH for PAO should be based on the following values of three parameters: CEA < 26°, FHC < 75%, and ilioischial angle >85.9°. To achieve better clinical results, it is necessary to increase the average CEA value by 11° and the average FHC by 11% and reduce the average ilioischial angle by 3°.

UNASSIGNED: Dysplastic hips infants may normalize spontaneously without any intervention due to the natural growth. However, some infants need one or more surgical interventions to achieve stable and non-dysplastic hips. The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of infants diagnosed with DDH before the age of 6 months undergoing surgical procedures of the hip(s) before the age of four years and to determine the number and types of surgical procedures in each infant.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective and consecutive study of all infants aged 0-6 months diagnosed with dysplasia of the hips in the combined paediatric orthopaedic and radiologic examination in the Region of Southern Denmark 2013-2017. From medical records, we obtained information about all surgical procedures in the hips including open or closed reductions, arthrographies, tenotomies, and pelvic osteotomies before the age of 4 years.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 281 infants with hip dysplasia were included. The median age at first examination was 48 days. In 254 (90%) of the infants, the hips resolved spontaneously, and 27 (10%) needed one or more surgical interventions. Overall, the 27 infants had 47 surgical intervention as 12 infants had more than one intervention. One infants had five surgical interventions. The most frequent surgical procedures were closed reduction and arthrography with or without adductor tenotomy (58%) and pelvic osteotomy (27%). Among infants with surgical interventions, 23 (8.2%) had unstable hips, and four (1.4%) had stable hips. All four infants with stable hips had an arthrography and none required a pelvic osteotomy.
UNASSIGNED: This study supports the propensity for spontaneous normalization early dysplasia of the hips in infants. Only a small proportion of the infants needed surgical interventions to achieve stable and non-dysplastic hips.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus regarding optimum timing and frequency of ultrasound (US) for monitoring response to Pavlik harness (PH) treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of our study was to determine if a limited-frequency hip US assessment had an adverse effect on treatment outcomes compared to traditional comprehensive US monitoring.
METHODS: This study was a single-centre noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Infants aged under six months whose hips were reduced and centred in the harness at initiation of treatment (stable dysplastic or subluxable), or initially decentred (subluxated or dislocated) but reduced and centred within four weeks of PH treatment, were randomized to our current standard US monitoring protocol (every clinic visit) or to a limited-frequency US protocol (US only at end of treatment). Groups were compared based on α angle and femoral head coverage at the end of PH treatment, acetabular indices, and International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade on one-year follow-up radiographs.
RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients were included; 42 patients completed the standard protocol (SP) and 40 completed the limited protocol (LP). There was no significant difference in mean right α angle at the end of treatment (SP 70.0° (SD 3.2°) ; LP 68.7° (SD 2.9°); p = 0.033), nor on the left (SP 69.0° (SD 3.5°); LP 68.1° (SD 3.3°); p = 0.128). There was no significant difference in mean right acetabular index at follow-up (SP 23.1° (SD 4.3°); LP 22.0° (SD 4.1°); p = 0.129), nor on the left (SP 23.3° (SD 4.2°); LP 22.8° (SD 3.9°); p = 0.284). All hips had femoral head coverage of > 50% at end of treatment, and all were IHDI grade 1 at follow-up. In addition, the LP group underwent a 60% reduction in US use once stable.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports reducing the frequency of US assessment during PH treatment of DDH once a hip is reduced and centred.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1081-1088.

BACKGROUND:  The study aimed to determine the proportions of infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and hip dislocation in infants referred for combined pediatric orthopedic and radiologic assessment, and to describe the association between DDH and different reasons of referral.
METHODS:  A prospective study of all infants aged 0-6 months referred for a combined examination of the hips 2013-2019. The proportion of DDH and unstable hip(s) stratified by different reasons of referral were calculated. Acetabular index > 30° in radiography or Graf Type 2b or worse in ultrasonography was considered diagnostic of DDH.
RESULTS:  Of the 1,989 infants included, 17% had stable dysplastic hip(s), and 4.7% had unstable dysplastic hip(s). The proportions of infants with DDH among infants with a single reason of referral were 36% for breech position, 25% for familial disposition, 14% for hip click, 8% for asymmetry, and 3% for twins. The proportions of infants with unstable hip(s) were 14% for familial disposition, 12% for breech position, 3% for hip click, 3% for twins, and 1% for asymmetry.
CONCLUSIONS:  The study demonstrates that a considerable proportion of infants referred for the combined examination have radiological signs of DDH and that DDH were regularly diagnosed in infants referred due to hip click or asymmetry.

UNASSIGNED: Closed reduction (CR) is a standard treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after failed conservative treatment. After CR, the affected hip is held in the reduced position by a spica cast that typically extends below the knee (long). Above knee (short) spica cast is an alternative technique utilized by some pediatric orthopedic surgeons. We aimed to compare short versus long spica cast after CR in terms of success rate and complications.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent CR with short or long hip spica cast over a 3-year period (2016-2019) were evaluated for the success (sustainability of the reduction) and complications. The acute and long-term success were recorded retrospectively. Acute success was defined as concentric reduction of the hip confirmed by intraoperative arthrogram and immediate postoperative CT scan. Long-term success was defined as maintained reduction at 12 months\' post reduction.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-seven patients were included in our study. Long spica casts were used in 24 patients and short ones in the remaining 23. The overall acute and long-term success rates were 83% and 66%, respectively. The acute success rate of long spica was 87.5%, while short spica achieved 78.2%. On the long term, the success rate of short spica was higher than long one (73.9% vs 58.3%). Cox regression analysis showed that the type of cast (short vs long spica) was not correlated with acute success (P = 0.405), long-term success (P = 0.263), residual dysplasia (P = 0.405), or avascular necrosis (P = 0.053).
UNASSIGNED: CR in DDH is an important line of management in the younger patient population and can save them an invasive open surgery later in life. A short leg spica could represent an easier and likely as successful alternative to the traditional long spica. More prospective future research is needed to validate our observational findings.
UNASSIGNED: III.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic and femoral osteotomies have been effective methods to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), neurogenic dislocation of the hip (NDH), and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term results after hip reconstruction in children with DDH, NDH, and LCPD.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, X-rays of 73 children (2-19 years) with DDH, NDH, and LCPD were measured before, 3 months, and at final follow-up (FU) after hip reconstructive surgery (open reduction, and femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy ± soft-tissue procedures between 2008 and 2018). Measurement of hip geometry included acetabular index (AI), center-edge angle (CE), and Reimers migration index (RMI). Mean follow-up time at final FU was 4.9 years. P value was set P < 0.05.
RESULTS: After surgery (femoral osteotomy: 84 hips, Salter innominate osteotomy: 21 hips, Pemberton osteotomy: 30 hips, open reduction: 28 hips, Chiari osteotomy: 4 hips, and soft-tissue release: 24 hips), hip geometry parameters improved significantly. Nevertheless, at final FU, there was deterioration in hip geometry with femoral head lateralization (RMI) compared to the data at 3 months after surgery (RMI: preop/3 months/final FU: 40.6 ± 16.1%/6.1 ± 9.0/15.4 ± 16.0%; CE: 11.3° ± 20.0°/30.2° ± 9.5°/27.9 ± 15.4°; AI: 28.8° ± 9.6°/19.1° ± 7.6°/18.3 ± 7.6°). Sub-group analysis did not show differences concerning the progression of RMI in DDH, NDH, and LCPD at final FU. Regardless of basic disease, the lateralization was observed in all three groups (DDH, NDH, and LCPD) and statistically significant comparing X-rays 3 months postoperatively to maximum follow-up (DDH; NDH; LCPD: 2.7 ± 6.8%/7.6 ± 10.1%; 13.7 ± 15.3%/22.8 ± 19.8%; 1.7 ± 4.1%/14.9 ± 11.3%). Additional soft-tissue release techniques in patients with DDH or NDH did not show postoperative differences with statistical significance. Concerning surgical techniques, a connection between the lower RMI and the procedure of osteotomy of the ilium was found. In 25 patients, (34%) complications were observed: superficial skin lesions in 8, deep skin lesions in 3, contraction of adductors in 3, subluxation in 2, dislocations of the cast in 2, osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 2 cases, reluxation in 1, infection of the implanted plate in 1, compliance problem in 1, delayed bone healing in 1, and contraction of knee flexors in 1 case.
CONCLUSIONS: The basic results of this study show a significant improvement of hip geometry at a follow-up of 4.9 years and prove findings of previously published literature. Moreover, the study was able to show a progression of RMI in all patient groups, which have undergone reconstructive surgery, despite basic hip geometry data (AI, CE angle) did not change. Those findings were independent from underlying pathology. Complications were counted in 34% of the patients and involved all known adverse events after hip reconstructive surgery. This makes clear why annual follow-up checks are needed not to miss the right indication for revision surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence level: Level IV, case series.
BACKGROUND: This manuscript is part of a prospective randomized clinical trial, registered in the German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00016861.