DDH

DDH
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)的诊断和治疗在临床实践中是高度可变的。为了获得更统一和循证的治疗途径,我们制定了“1岁以下儿童DDH的荷兰指南”。这项研究描述了不稳定和倾斜臀部的建议。
    应用了研究和评估准则的评估(AGREEII)。对六个预定义的指南问题进行了系统的文献综述。提出了建议,根据文献发现,以及危害/好处,患者/父母偏好,和成本(等级)。
    经系统文献检索,共收录843篇,共11篇。最终的指南建议是(i)Pavlik线束是治疗(亚)脱位髋关节的首选第一步;(ii)在3-4周和6-8周进行超声随访;(iii)如果6-8周后没有出现居中和稳定的髋关节,闭合复位;(iv)如果复位受到有限的髋关节外展的限制,内收肌肌腱切开术;(V)在切开复位的情况下,前部,前外侧,或建议内侧入路,根据手术偏好和经验进行选择;(vi)复位后(闭合/开放),spica演员被建议12周,在残余发育不良的情况下,随后使用外展装置。
    本研究提出了治疗偏心DDH的建议,根据现有文献和专家共识,作为第一个官方和国家基于证据的“1岁以下儿童DDH指南”的第二部分。第1部分在单独的文章中描述了关于居中DDH的指南部分。
    UNASSIGNED: Diagnostics and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are highly variable in clinical practice. To obtain more uniform and evidence-based treatment pathways, we developed the \'Dutch guideline for DDH in children < 1 year\'. This study describes recommendations for unstable and decentered hips.
    UNASSIGNED: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation criteria (AGREE II) were applied. A systematic literature review was performed for six predefined guideline questions. Recommendations were developed, based on literature findings, as well as harms/benefits, patient/parent preferences, and costs (GRADE).
    UNASSIGNED: The systematic literature search resulted in 843 articles and 11 were included. Final guideline recommendations are (i) Pavlik harness is the preferred first step in the treatment of (sub) luxated hips; (ii) follow-up with ultrasound at 3-4 and 6-8 weeks; (iii) if no centered and stable hip after 6-8 weeks is present, closed reduction is indicated; (iv) if reduction is restricted by limited hip abduction, adductor tenotomy is indicated; (v) in case of open reduction, the anterior, anterolateral, or medial approach is advised, with the choice based on surgical preference and experience; (vi) after reduction (closed/open), a spica cast is advised for 12 weeks, followed by an abduction device in case of residual dysplasia.
    UNASSIGNED: This study presents recommendations on the treatment of decentered DDH, based on the available literature and expert consensus, as Part 2 of the first official and national evidence-based \'Guideline for DDH in children < 1 year\'. Part 1 describes the guideline sections on centered DDH in a separate article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)的发病率很高,治疗非常多样化。因此,荷兰骨科协会制定了一项临床实践指南,建议对DDH进行最佳和统一的治疗.本文总结了有关居中DDH(即Graf类型2A-C)的指南。准则的制定遵循了《研究与评估准则II》的评估标准。进行了系统的文献综述,以确定随机对照试验和比较队列研究,包括患有中心DDH的<1岁儿童。包括比较(1)治疗与观察的文章,(2)不同的外展装置,(3)跟踪频率,和(4)中止方法。建议基于分级建议评估,发展,和评估,其中包括文学,临床经验和共识,患者和父母的安慰,和成本。在430篇潜在相关文章中,纳入5项比较研究。最终的指南建议是:(1)最初观察3个月大的中心DDH患者,如果髋关节在6-12周后未恢复正常,则开始外展治疗;(2)对6个月以下且持续进行DDH的儿童进行Pavlik线束重复超声检查,为6个月以上的儿童考虑替代外展装置;(3)每6周对患者进行一次评估;(4)当髋关节恢复正常或儿童12个月时停止外展装置.本文总结了第一个循证指南的第1部分,该指南用于治疗<1岁的儿童中的DDH。第2部分在另一篇文章中介绍了关于decentrateDDH的指南。
    Despite the high incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), treatment is very diverse. Therefore, the Dutch Orthopedic Society developed a clinical practice guideline with recommendations for optimal and uniform treatment of DDH. This article summarizes the guideline on centered DDH (i.e. Graf types 2A-C). The guideline development followed the criteria of Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II. A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies including children <1 year with centered DDH. Articles were included that compared (1) treatment with observation, (2) different abduction devices, (3) follow-up frequencies, and (4) discontinuation methods. Recommendations were based on Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, which included the literature, clinical experience and consensus, patient and parent comfort, and costs. Out of 430 potentially relevant articles, 5 comparative studies were included. Final guideline recommendations were (1) initially observe 3-month-old patients with centered DDH, start abduction treatment if the hip does not normalize after 6-12 weeks; (2) prescribe a Pavlik harness to children <6 months with persisting DDH on repeated ultrasonography, consider alternative abduction devices for children >6 months; (3) assess patients every 6 weeks; and (4) discontinue the abduction device when the hip has normalized or when the child is 12 months. This paper presents a summary of part 1 of the first evidence-based guideline for treatment of centered DDH in children <1 year. Part 2 presents the guideline on decentered DDH in a separate article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To understand the variation in the management of hip dysplasia identified from the United Kingdom neonatal selective screening programme.
    UNASSIGNED: Having been designed and tested by the research committee of the British Society for Children\'s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS), a nationwide online survey was conducted of BSCOS members to ascertain their treatment strategies for neonatal hip dysplasia.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 111 responses (60% of members), which illustrated wide variation in care. In all, 91 (over 80%) of respondents treat more than ten cases per year, yet only 61 (55%) work to an agreed protocol. A total of 90 (81%) use the Graf classification and 103 (93%) use the Pavlik harness initially. Consensus is lacking in key areas including duration of harness use, hours per day, clothing and weaning. Importantly, notable differences of opinion even exist regarding which hip pathologies need treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: This study quantifies the wide variation in many key elements of the initial treatment of neonatal hip dysplasia in the United Kingdom. This variation appears unnecessary and unacceptable as the Getting It Right First Time programme seeks to standardize care pathways. The charitable sector has called for consensus to mitigate parental anxiety, and it has been suggested that this could allow better integration of hip dysplasia into national screening pathways. Standardized care benefits patients and represents the platform from which we can begin understanding effectiveness and optimizing outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Level V.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号