Coronary angiography

冠状动脉造影
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血浆尿酸与白蛋白之比(UAR)被认为是炎症的新型指标。然而,UAR与冠状动脉慢血流现象(CSFP)之间的关联尚不清楚.
    方法:本研究共纳入1328例慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)患者行冠状动脉造影(CAG),未发现明显的阻塞性狭窄(<40%)。79例发生CSFP,分为CSFP组。将1:2年龄匹配的冠状动脉血流量正常的患者分配到对照组(n=158)。临床特点,实验室参数,包括尿酸,白蛋白比,比较两组的UAR和血管造影特征。
    结果:CSFP患者的尿酸水平较高(392.3±85.3vs.273.8±71.5,P<0.001),UAR(10.7±2.2vs.7.2±1.9,P<0.001),但血浆白蛋白水平较低(36.9±4.2vs.38.5±3.6,P=0.003)。此外,UAR随着CSFP涉及的船只数量的增加而增加。Logistic回归分析显示UAR是CSFP的独立预测因子。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,当UAR大于7.9时,AUC为0.883(95%CI:0.840-0.927,p<0.001),敏感性和特异性分别为78.2%和88.2%。
    结论:尿酸与血浆白蛋白联用,UAR可以作为CSFP的独立预测因子。
    BACKGROUND: The plasma uric acid to albumin ratio (UAR) is considered as a novel indicator for Inflammation. However, the association between UAR and coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) remains unclear.
    METHODS: A total of 1328 individuals with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) receiving coronary angiography (CAG) and found no obvious obstructive stenosis (< 40%) were included in this study. 79 individuals developed CSFP and were divided into CSFP group. The 1:2 age-matched patients with normal coronary blood flow were allocated to the control group (n = 158). The clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters including uric acid, albumin ratio, UAR and the angiographic characteristics were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Patients with CSFP had a higher level of uric acid (392.3 ± 85.3 vs. 273.8 ± 71.5, P < 0.001), UAR (10.7 ± 2.2 vs. 7.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001), but a lower level of plasma albumin (36.9 ± 4.2 vs. 38.5 ± 3.6, P = 0.003). Moreover, UAR increased as the numbers of vessels involved in CSFP increased. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that UAR was independent predictors for CSFP. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that when UAR was more than 7.9, the AUC was 0.883 (95% CI: 0.840-0.927, p < 0.001), with the sensitivity and specificity were 78.2% and 88.2% respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combined uric acid with plasma albumin, UAR could serve as an independent predictor for CSFP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:右冠状动脉的异常起源和动脉间进程是一种罕见的异常,如果不及时治疗,可导致突然的缺血性心脏死亡。我们介绍了一例患者,该患者的右冠状动脉异常起源于左冠状窦,并通过使用合适的乳内动脉导管进行了冠状动脉搭桥手术。近端右冠状动脉结扎以防止竞争性流动。
    方法:一名69岁男性,有10年间歇性胸痛和呼吸困难病史,检查结果阴性,接受了心导管检查,显示源自左冠状窦的异常右冠状动脉(RCA),升主动脉和肺动脉之间的动脉间通道,近端RCA变窄约70%。患者使用右乳内动脉(RIMA)作为导管进行了体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术,RCA的第2段是目标。近端RCA结扎。术中,没有缺血或心律失常的迹象。患者成功地从体外循环中取出,并最终出院回家。
    结论:以乳内动脉为导管的冠状动脉搭桥手术可以成功治疗具有动脉间过程的右冠状动脉异常症状。近端右冠状动脉的结扎对于最大程度地减少通过旁路移植物的竞争流量至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: An anomalous origin and inter-arterial course of the right coronary artery is a rare anomaly that can lead to sudden ischemic cardiac death if left untreated. We present a case of a patient with an anomalous right coronary artery originating from the left coronary sinus and an inter-arterial course that was managed with coronary artery bypass surgery using a suitable internal mammary artery conduit. The proximal right coronary artery was ligated to prevent competitive flow.
    METHODS: A 69 year-old-male with a ten-year history of intermittent chest pain and dyspnea with a negative workup underwent a cardiac catheterization, which showed an anomalous right coronary artery (RCA) originating from the left coronary sinus, with an inter-arterial course between the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery, and approximately 70% narrowing of the proximal RCA. The patient underwent an on-pump coronary artery bypass using the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) as a conduit, with segment 2 of the RCA being the target. The proximal RCA was ligated. Intra-operatively, there were no signs of ischemia or arrhythmia. The patient was successfully taken off cardiopulmonary bypass and eventually discharged home.
    CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic anomalous origin of the right coronary artery with an inter-arterial course can be treated successfully with coronary artery bypass surgery with the internal mammary artery as a conduit. Ligation of the proximal right coronary artery is essential to minimize competitive flow through the bypass graft.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现有的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)诊断方法,如冠状动脉造影和血流储备分数(FFR),对它们的侵入性有限制,成本,和不适。我们探索了一种新的诊断方法,冠状动脉造影强度分析(CCIA),并将其与FFR进行了比较分析。
    方法:我们使用了一种体外冠状动脉循环模拟系统,该系统具有9种狭窄模型,分别代表各种狭窄长度(6、18和30mm)和程度(30%,50%,和70%)。分析了CCIA的血管造影亮度值。体内实验包括15例正常窦性心律的患者。进行了冠状动脉造影,动脉运动被追踪,启用CCIA推导。将CCIA值与FFR(n=15)和瞬时无波比(iFR;n=11)测量值进行比较。
    结果:体外FFR显示出与狭窄的长度和严重程度相关的一致趋势。CCIA与狭窄有关,但与长度的相关性较弱,除70%狭窄外(6mm:0.82±0.007,0.68±0.007,0.61±0.004;18mm:0.78±0.052,0.69±0.025,0.44±0.016;30mm:0.80±0.018,0.64±0.006,0.40±0.026,30%50%,70%,分别)。体外CCIA与FFR显著相关(R=0.9442,p<0.01)。体内分析显示,CCIA和FFR(R=0.5775,p<0.05)与iFR(n=11,R=0.7578,p<0.01)之间存在显着相关性。
    结论:CCIA是诊断CAD患者狭窄的有希望的替代方法。患者的初步体外验证和体内确认证明了在冠状动脉造影期间应用CCIA的可行性。需要进一步的临床研究来全面评估CCIA对CAD管理的诊断准确性和潜在影响。
    BACKGROUND: The existing diagnostic methods for coronary artery disease (CAD), such as coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR), have limitations regarding their invasiveness, cost, and discomfort. We explored a novel diagnostic approach, coronary contrast intensity analysis (CCIA), and conducted a comparative analysis between it and FFR.
    METHODS: We used an in vitro coronary-circulation-mimicking system with nine stenosis models representing various stenosis lengths (6, 18, and 30 mm) and degrees (30%, 50%, and 70%). The angiographic brightness values were analyzed for CCIA. The in vivo experiments included 15 patients with a normal sinus rhythm. Coronary angiography was performed, and arterial movement was tracked, enabling CCIA derivation. The CCIA values were compared with the FFR (n = 15) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR; n = 11) measurements.
    RESULTS: In vitro FFR showed a consistent trend related to the length and severity of stenosis. The CCIA was related to stenosis but had a weaker correlation with length, except for with 70% stenosis (6 mm: 0.82 ± 0.007, 0.68 ± 0.007, 0.61 ± 0.004; 18 mm: 0.78 ± 0.052, 0.69 ± 0.025, 0.44 ± 0.016; 30 mm: 0.80 ± 0.018, 0.64 ± 0.006, 0.40 ± 0.026 at 30%, 50%, and 70%, respectively). In vitro CCIA and FFR were significantly correlated (R = 0.9442, p < 0.01). The in vivo analysis revealed significant correlations between CCIA and FFR (R = 0.5775, p < 0.05) and the iFR (n = 11, R = 0.7578, p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: CCIA is a promising alternative for diagnosing stenosis in patients with CAD. The initial in vitro validation and in vivo confirmation in patients demonstrate the feasibility of applying CCIA during coronary angiography. Further clinical studies are warranted to fully evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and potential impact of CCIA on CAD management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过基于流体力学方程(FFR2D)的常规二维冠状动脉造影分析,提出一种快速,精确计算血流储备分数的新方法。材料和方法:这是一项初步分析研究,旨在评估FFR2D的诊断性能与用压力导线测量的FFR金标准(阈值≤0.80)的诊断性能,以用于中度冠状动脉狭窄的生理评估。在一个学术中心,我们对2020年9月1日至2022年9月1日期间进行诊断性冠状动脉造影和潜在血运重建的连续患者进行了筛选.以最小重叠和/或缩短的最佳视角对常规二维血管造影照片进行半自动分割,以得出中间冠状动脉病变的血管几何形状。并将非线性压力-流量数学关系应用于计算FFR2D。结果:分析了约88例具有单个中度冠状动脉病变的连续患者(LADn=74,RCAn=9,LCXn=5;直径狭窄百分比为45.7±11.0%)。计算的FFR2D平均为0.821±0.048,与侵入性FFR密切相关(r=0.68,p<0.001)。FFR2D和侵入性导线FFR之间的一致性非常好,测量偏差最小(平均差:0.000±0.048)。FFR2D诊断严重心外膜动脉狭窄的总体准确性为90.9%(总共88例中有80例正确分类)。FFR2D确定了24个真阳性,56个真正的底片,4个假阳性,4个假阴性,预测FFR≤0.80,灵敏度为85.7%,特异性为93.3%,正似然比为13.0,负似然比为0.15。与2D-QCA的50%DS(ROC曲线下面积:0.70[95%CI:0.59-0.82];p=0.0001)相比,FFR2D具有明显更好的判别能力(ROC曲线下面积:0.95[95%CI:0.91-0.99])。图像分析的中位时间为2分钟,FFR2D结果的中位计算时间为0.1s。结论:FFR2D可以快速得出基于图像的精确血流储备分数度量,并且基于单个二维冠状动脉造影具有很高的诊断准确性。
    Objective: To present a novel pipeline for rapid and precise computation of fractional flow reserve from an analysis of routine two-dimensional coronary angiograms based on fluid mechanics equations (FFR2D). Material and methods: This was a pilot analytical study that was designed to assess the diagnostic performance of FFR2D versus the gold standard of FFR (threshold ≤ 0.80) measured with a pressure wire for the physiological assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenoses. In a single academic center, consecutive patients referred for diagnostic coronary angiography and potential revascularization between 1 September 2020 and 1 September 2022 were screened for eligibility. Routine two-dimensional angiograms at optimal viewing angles with minimal overlap and/or foreshortening were segmented semi-automatically to derive the vascular geometry of intermediate coronary lesions, and nonlinear pressure-flow mathematical relationships were applied to compute FFR2D. Results: Some 88 consecutive patients with a single intermediate coronary artery lesion were analyzed (LAD n = 74, RCA n = 9 and LCX n = 5; percent diameter stenosis of 45.7 ± 11.0%). The computed FFR2D was on average 0.821 ± 0.048 and correlated well with invasive FFR (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). There was very good agreement between FFR2D and invasive-wire FFR with minimal measurement bias (mean difference: 0.000 ± 0.048). The overall accuracy of FFR2D for diagnosing a critical epicardial artery stenosis was 90.9% (80 cases classified correctly out of 88 in total). FFR2D identified 24 true positives, 56 true negatives, 4 false positives, and 4 false negatives and predicted FFR ≤ 0.80 with a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 93.3%, positive likelihood ratio of 13.0, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.15. FFR2D had a significantly better discriminatory capacity (area under the ROC curve: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.91-0.99]) compared to 50%DS on 2D-QCA (area under the ROC curve: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.59-0.82]; p = 0.0001) in predicting wire FFR ≤ 0.80. The median time of image analysis was 2 min and the median time of computation of the FFR2D results was 0.1 s. Conclusion: FFR2D may rapidly derive a precise image-based metric of fractional flow reserve with high diagnostic accuracy based on a single two-dimensional coronary angiogram.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    编织冠状动脉(WCA)是一种罕见的异常,其病因仍在推测中。先天性和获得性因素都被认为与发病机理有关。在一个35岁的男人身上,通过光学相干断层扫描评估WCA的组织特征。连续冠状动脉造影显示获得性因素是原因,血栓再通是最可能的病理机制。
    Woven coronary artery (WCA) is a rare anomaly and its etiology remains speculative. Both congenital and acquired factors are considered to be concerned with the pathogenesis. In a 35-year-old man, the tissue characteristics of WCA were evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Serial coronary angiography indicated that acquired factor is the cause, and thrombus recanalization is the most likely pathological mechanism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微量白蛋白尿是一种公认的,坚强,和心血管疾病的独立危险因素。患有微量白蛋白尿的患者也被认为比未患有多血管冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者具有更高的动脉粥样硬化负荷。在这项研究中,我们试图将微量白蛋白尿与CAD的严重程度相关联。在这项横断面研究中,从2019年8月至2021年8月,纳入100例经冠状动脉造影诊断为CAD的患者。有微量白蛋白尿的病例中有79.4%观察到三血管CAD,而没有微量白蛋白尿的病例中有3%。微量白蛋白尿与病情严重程度的相关性有统计学意义(P<0.01)。在CAD病例中,微量白蛋白尿与Framingham风险评分之间存在显着相关性(P<0.01)。这是心血管疾病10年风险的衡量标准。
    Microalbuminuria is a well-established, strong, and independent risk factor of cardiovascular disease. Patients with microalbuminuria are also said to have a higher atherosclerotic load in the form of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) than those who do not. In this study, we tried to correlate microalbuminuria with the severity of CAD. In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with CAD diagnosed on the basis of coronary angiography were enrolled from August 2019 to August 2021. Triple-vessel CAD was observed in 79.4% of cases with the presence of microalbuminuria compared with 3% of cases without microalbuminuria. The association of microalbuminuria with the severity of disease was statistically significant (P <0.01). A significant correlation was observed between microalbuminuria and the Framingham risk score in cases of CAD (P <0.01), which was a measure of the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病是肾移植后死亡的重要原因。目前尚不清楚无症状肾移植患者(KTC)的移植前冠状动脉疾病(CAD)筛查是否有益。
    我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,评估了192例接受移植前CAD评估的高危KTC的移植后心血管事件。该研究旨在确定与在移植前血管造影中发现严重CAD相关的危险因素,并评估筛查策略与移植后心血管事件之间的关系。
    移植后五年,23.9%的受试者发生心血管事件.先前的CAD病史和左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%与移植前血管造影发现严重CAD的较高几率相关。血管造影的严重CAD与移植后6个月内早期心血管事件的高风险相关。然而,KTC合并重度CAD的冠状动脉介入治疗与较低的移植后心血管事件发生率无关.
    在有CAD病史或LVEF<50%的KTC中,移植前冠状动脉造影以识别严重CAD的产量最高。我们的发现表明,在KTC中识别出严重的CAD对移植后的早期具有预后意义。在这些高风险KTC中优化药物治疗可能会改善移植后的心血管结局。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of mortality after kidney transplantation. Whether pre-transplant screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic kidney transplant candidates (KTCs) is beneficial is unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating post-transplant cardiovascular events in 192 high-risk KTCs who underwent pre-transplant CAD evaluation. The study aimed to identify risk factors associated with finding severe CAD on pre-transplant angiography, and to assess the relationship between screening strategies and post-transplant cardiovascular events.
    UNASSIGNED: At five years post-transplant, cardiovascular events occurred in 23.9% of subjects. Prior CAD history and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% were associated with higher odds of finding severe CAD on pre-transplant angiography. Severe CAD on angiography was associated with a higher risk of early cardiovascular events within six months of transplantation. However, coronary intervention in KTCs with severe CAD was not associated with lower rates of post-transplant cardiovascular events.
    UNASSIGNED: Pre-transplant coronary angiography to identify severe CAD is of highest yield in KTCs with a history of CAD or an LVEF < 50%. Our findings indicate that the identification of severe CAD in KTCs has prognostic significance for the early post-transplant period. Optimization of medical therapy in these high-risk KTCs may improve post-transplant cardiovascular outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:INCORPORATE试验旨在评估对于严重肢体缺血(CLI)治疗的患者,默认冠状动脉造影(CA)和缺血靶向血运重建是否优于保守方法。2018年10月19日在clinicaltrials.gov(NCT03712644)注册。
    背景:严重的外周动脉疾病与心血管风险增加和预后不良相关。
    方法:公司是一个开放标签,前瞻性1:1随机多中心试验招募了成功接受CLI治疗的患者.对于潜在的冠状动脉疾病(CAD),患者被随机分为保守或侵入性方法。保守组单独接受最佳药物治疗,侵入性组进行常规CA和血流储备分数引导的血运重建。主要终点是心肌梗死(MI)和12个月死亡率。
    结果:由于COVID-19大流行的负担,招聘过早停止。招募了一百八十五名患者。基线心脏症状很少,92%无症状。89例患者被随机分配到侵入性方法中,其中73例接受了CA。34%的人患有功能性单血管疾病,26%患有功能性多血管疾病,90%实现了完全血运重建。保守组和侵入性组在1年时的死亡和MI发生率相似(11%vs10%;风险比1.21[0.49-2.98])。主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)在保守组的危险趋势(20比10%;风险比1.94[0.90-4.19])。在符合方案的分析中,主要终点保持无显著差异(11%vs7%;风险比2.01[0.72-5.57]),但保守方法的MACCE风险较高(20%vs7%;风险比2.88[1.24-6.68]).
    结论:该试验发现主要终点没有显着差异,但在保守组观察到较高的MACCE趋势。
    OBJECTIVE: INCORPORATE trial was designed to evaluate whether default coronary-angiography (CA) and ischemia-targeted revascularization is superior compared to a conservative approach for patients with treated critical limb ischemia (CLI). Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03712644) on October 19, 2018.
    BACKGROUND: Severe peripheral artery disease is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and poor outcomes.
    METHODS: INCORPORATE was an open-label, prospective 1:1 randomized multicentric trial that recruited patients who had undergone successful CLI treatment. Patients were randomized to either a conservative or invasive approach regarding potential coronary artery disease (CAD). The conservative group received optimal medical therapy alone, while the invasive group had routine CA and fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization. The primary endpoint was myocardial infarction (MI) and 12-month mortality.
    RESULTS: Due to COVID-19 pandemic burdens, recruitment was halted prematurely. One hundred eighty-five patients were enrolled. Baseline cardiac symptoms were scarce with 92% being asymptomatic. Eighty-nine patients were randomized to the invasive approach of whom 73 underwent CA. Thirty-four percent had functional single-vessel disease, 26% had functional multi-vessel disease, and 90% achieved complete revascularization. Conservative and invasive groups had similar incidences of death and MI at 1 year (11% vs 10%; hazard ratio 1.21 [0.49-2.98]). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) trended for hazard in the Conservative group (20 vs 10%; hazard ratio 1.94 [0.90-4.19]). In the per-protocol analysis, the primary endpoint remained insignificantly different (11% vs 7%; hazard ratio 2.01 [0.72-5.57]), but the conservative approach had a higher MACCE risk (20% vs 7%; hazard ratio 2.88 [1.24-6.68]).
    CONCLUSIONS: This trial found no significant difference in the primary endpoint but observed a trend of higher MACCE in the conservative arm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名9岁男孩被怀疑患有急性心肌梗塞,并进行了紧急冠状动脉造影。在任一冠状动脉中均未检测到血流受限的迹象。我们从升主动脉进行了血管内超声检查,这显示了左主干上的一个山脊像一个阀门,导致明显的狭窄。支架置入经皮冠状动脉介入治疗效果良好。
    A 9-year-old boy was suspected of having acute myocardial infarction and emergency coronary angiogram was performed. No signs of flow limitation in either coronary artery was detected. We performed intravascular ultrasonography from the ascending aorta, which showed a ridge on the left main trunk acting like a valve, resulting in significant stenosis. Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent deployment was performed with good result.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号