Community mental health

社区心理健康
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在英国,黑人男性在获得心理健康服务时是最弱势群体之一。定性研究对如何带来公平有广泛的指导,但目前尚不清楚这些证据是如何实施的。
    系统地审查帮助黑人获得及时和适当的精神保健的干预措施,并探索其性质和有效性。
    我们在PROSPERO(CRD42022345323)上注册。我们搜索了截至2023年9月的电子数据库,以寻找至少50%的黑人男性参与者接受干预以改善社区环境中获得心理健康支持的研究。我们对符合条件的研究进行了叙述性综合。
    五项研究符合我们的纳入标准。一个重要的特点是通过同伴支持讨论思想和感受,导致经验的正常化。
    关于支持黑人获得社区心理健康支持的干预措施的研究很少。积极测试干预措施,不仅仅是寻求定性的反馈,是必需的。有必要采取循证策略来支持招募黑人进行研究。专员可以考虑通常被认为不太可靠的证据,以减轻研究中潜在的种族偏见,并刺激证据基础的增长。
    UNASSIGNED: Black men are one of the most disadvantaged groups when accessing mental health services in the UK. There is extensive guidance from qualitative research on how to bring equity, but it is unclear how this evidence is being implemented.
    UNASSIGNED: To systematically review interventions that help Black men access timely and appropriate mental health care and to explore their nature and effectiveness.
    UNASSIGNED: We registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022345323). We searched electronic databases up to September 2023 for studies with at least 50% of Black male participants receiving an intervention to improve access to mental health support in community settings. We conducted a narrative synthesis of eligible studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Five studies met our inclusion criteria. An important characteristic was discussing thoughts and feelings through peer support, leading to a normalization of experiences.
    UNASSIGNED: There is a paucity of research into interventions that support Black men accessing community mental health support. Proactively testing interventions, not just seeking qualitative feedback, is required. Evidence-based strategies to support recruitment of Black men into research is necessary. Commissioners could consider evidence typically seen as less robust to mitigate against an underlying racial bias within research and stimulate the growth of an evidence base.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于欧洲殖民,澳大利亚原住民的心理健康问题发生率过高,西方循证治疗在改善这种情况方面非常无效。文化治疗方式是由维多利亚州原住民儿童和社区机构开发的一种文化特定的康复和福祉实践框架,侧重于基于文化的实践,创伤意识,和自决。尽管人们广泛认识到这些元素在土著康复和福祉计划中的重要性,其可衡量的经验影响目前尚不清楚。本文总结了系统范围审查的结果,以确定已发布的文化治疗方法知识库以及可以为未来评估提供信息的知识空白。与来自澳大利亚的土著参与者一起应用文化治疗方式的项目的42项研究,加拿大,新西兰,和美利坚合众国是从文献检索中确定的。基于文化治疗方式的服务有助于康复和健康,因为它们创造了安全,加强文化联系,发展赋权并提供释放情感的机会,并增加社会和精神支持。由于审查旨在确定已发表的文化治疗方法的证据基础,其他有效的方法可能被忽视了。建立文化治疗方法的证据基础,服务设计必须清楚地描述目标群体,该程序是否由原住民提供,服务提供中使用的文化治疗方法的过程,以及它们如何与西方方法融合在一起。研究工作也可以富有成效地侧重于确定或构建文化上适当的成果衡量标准。
    Aboriginal Australians experience disproportionately high rates of mental health problems as the result of European colonisation, and Western evidence-based treatment has been strikingly ineffective in improving the situation. Cultural Therapeutic Ways is a culturally specific healing and wellbeing practice framework developed by the Victorian Aboriginal Child and Community Agency that focuses on culturally based practices, trauma awareness, and self-determination. Despite wide recognition of the importance of these elements in Indigenous healing and wellbeing programs, its measurable empirical impact is currently unclear. This paper summarises findings from a systematic scoping review to ascertain the published knowledge base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways and the gaps in knowledge that can inform future evaluation. Forty-two studies of programs that applied Cultural Therapeutic Ways with Indigenous participants from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States of America were identified from the literature search. Services based on Cultural Therapeutic Ways contributed to healing and wellbeing because they create safety, strengthen cultural connections, develop empowerment and provide opportunities to release emotion, and increase social and spiritual support. As the review set out to determine the published evidence base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways, other effective approaches may have been overlooked. To develop the evidence base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways, service design must clearly describe target groups, whether the program is delivered by Aboriginal people, the processes of Cultural Therapeutic Ways utilised in service delivery, and how they are blended with Western approaches. Research efforts could also productively be focused on identifying or constructing culturally appropriate outcome measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的四十年里,研究强调了从系统角度接近和预防创伤的重要性。创伤知情护理(TIC)方法为医疗保健实践提供了一种结构,努力将组织转变为采用创伤特定干预措施的创伤知情系统。这篇综述采用了土耳其的流行病学和家庭数据,强调了整合创伤知情护理作为预防和干预手段的重要性。通过案头审查,这项研究考察了不良童年经历(ACE)的作用,从家庭动态中深入研究它们的起源,迁移,暴力,暴露于暴力,青少年犯罪,虐待儿童。该研究强调了创新的医疗保健方法,这些方法利用数据来解决复杂的患者健康问题,同时考虑心理健康需求。在当代,医疗机构承认数据驱动方法在做出明智的临床决策方面的价值,加强治疗程序,改善整体医疗结果。回顾的研究和经验数据证明了优先考虑创伤预防和治疗的有效和高效治疗方法的重要性。整合ACE的作用。本文旨在促进有关转变医疗保健系统以满足土耳其家庭医疗保健需求的讨论,同时考虑到塑造土耳其人口特征的不断演变的社会政治因素。
    Over the past four decades, research has underscored the significance of approaching and preventing trauma from a systemic standpoint. Trauma-informed care (TIC) methodologies offer a structure for healthcare practices, striving to convert organizations into trauma-informed systems that employ trauma-specific interventions. This review employs epidemiological and household data from Turkey to underscore the importance of integrating trauma-informed care as a means of prevention and intervention. Through a desk review, the study examines the role of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), delving into their origin from family dynamics, migration, violence, exposure to violence, juvenile delinquency, and child maltreatment. The research highlights innovative healthcare approaches that leverage data to address complex patient health issues while considering mental health needs. In contemporary times, healthcare organizations acknowledge the value of a data-driven approach to make informed clinical decisions, enhance treatment procedures, and improve overall healthcare outcomes. The reviewed research and empirical data furnish proof of the importance of effective and efficient treatment methods that prioritize trauma prevention and treatment, integrating the role of ACEs. This paper seeks to contribute to discussions on transforming the healthcare system to meet the healthcare needs of Turkish households, all the while taking into account the evolving sociopolitical factors that shape Turkey\'s population characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球范围内,COVID-19对精神卫生系统产生了巨大影响,但是,关于社区精神卫生(CMH)系统和服务如何促进大流行精神卫生应对的研究是有限的。我们进行了系统回顾和元人种学研究,以了解CMH服务的作用,CMH护理质量的决定因素,以及COVID-19期间CMH系统内的动力学。我们在五个数据库中进行了搜索和筛选,并使用CASP工具评估了研究质量,共进行了27项定性研究。我们的元人种学过程使用Nablet和Hare的方法来综合发现并将解释性分析应用于原始研究。这确定了几个关键主题。首先,CMH系统在更广泛的心理健康生态系统中发挥了安全网和网络的宝贵作用,而CMH服务提供商在大流行中断中向服务用户提供了持续的信任关系。其次,我们发现,COVID-19期间CMH护理质量的决定因素包括资源和容量,跨服务提供商的连接,定制护理选项,容易进入,和人的联系。最后,我们观察到,整个CMH格局中的权力动态不成比例地将边缘化群体排除在主流CMH系统和服务之外。我们的研究结果表明,虽然CMH的大流行作用很明显,效率是由各个服务提供商努力满足需求和服务用户的需求所驱动的。为了在未来重新扮演大流行的角色,需要共同努力,使CMH系统成为国家灾难精神卫生响应的宝贵组成部分,并投资于优质护理,特别是对于边缘化群体。
    Globally, COVID-19 had an immense impact on mental health systems, but research on how community mental health (CMH) systems and services contributed to the pandemic mental health response is limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-ethnography to understand the roles of CMH services, determinants of the quality of CMH care, and dynamics within CMH systems during COVID-19. We searched and screened across five databases and appraised study quality using the CASP tool, which yielded 27 qualitative studies. Our meta-ethnographic process used Noblit and Hare\'s approach for synthesizing findings and applying interpretive analysis to original research. This identified several key themes. Firstly, CMH systems played the valuable pandemic role of safety nets and networks for the broader mental health ecosystem, while CMH service providers offered a continuous relationship of trust to service users amidst pandemic disruptions. Secondly, we found that the determinants of quality CMH care during COVID-19 included resourcing and capacity, connections across service providers, customized care options, ease of access, and human connection. Finally, we observed that power dynamics across the CMH landscape disproportionately excluded marginalized groups from mainstream CMH systems and services. Our findings suggest that while the pandemic role of CMH was clear, effectiveness was driven by the efforts of individual service providers to meet demand and service users\' needs. To reprise its pandemic role in the future, a concerted effort is needed to make CMH systems a valuable part of countries\' disaster mental health response and to invest in quality care, particularly for marginalized groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:本研究旨在对严重精神疾病患者长期住院结果的研究进行系统评价,将再入院率作为主要结果。
    方法:考虑的研究对象是年龄在18至64岁之间的患有严重精神疾病的参与者;长期暴露于精神病医院或病房(超过一年);主要结局是再入院率;次要结局是再入院时间,employment,学校教育,和社会参与;研究设计为观察性或介入性随机对照试验(RCT)设计。使用MEDLINE搜索相关研究,PsycINFO,WebofScience,CINAHL,和日本医学抽象学会。最终搜索于2022年2月1日进行。非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险被用来评估方法学质量。还进行了描述性文献综述。
    结果:在最初搜索的11,999项研究中,3项队列研究(2,293名参与者)符合入选标准.这些研究中的偏倚风险被评为严重或严重。住院超过一年的精神分裂症患者的1-10年再入院率为33%至55%。两项研究中描述的平均再入院持续时间为每年70.5±95.6天(在7.5年随访的情况下)和306±399天(在3-8年随访的情况下)。没有一项研究报告了本研究中定义的其他结果。
    结论:纳入研究的再入院率各不相同。随访期或社区服务强度的差异可能是造成这种差异的原因。在准备实施去制度化的国家,应设计高度个性化的社区支持,以避免在监督下搬迁到住宅服务。再入院的住院时间短于索引入院的住院时间。结果还表明,向社区出院有助于改善临床结果,例如改善社会功能。由于再次住院的风险而保留患者的有效性被认为很低。还讨论了未来的研究方向。
    This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of studies on the outcomes of long-term hospitalisation of individuals with severe mental illness, considering readmission rates as the primary outcome.
    Studies considered were those in which participants were aged between 18 and 64 years with severe mental illness; exposure to psychiatric hospitals or wards was long-term (more than one year); primary outcomes were readmission rates; secondary outcomes were duration of readmission, employment, schooling, and social participation; and the study design was either observational or interventional with a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Japan Medical Abstract Society. The final search was conducted on 1 February 2022. The risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions was used to assess the methodological quality. A descriptive literature review is also conducted.
    Of the 11,999 studies initially searched, three cohort studies (2,293 participants) met the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in these studies was rated as critical or serious. The 1-10 years readmission rate for patients with schizophrenia who had been hospitalised for more than one year ranged from 33 to 55%. The average of readmission durations described in the two studies was 70.5 ± 95.6 days per year (in the case of a 7.5-year follow-up) and 306 ± 399 days (in the case of a 3-8-year follow-up). None of the studies reported other outcomes defined in this study.
    The readmission rates in the included studies varied. Differences in the follow-up period or the intensity of community services may have contributed to this variability. In countries preparing to implement de-institutionalisation, highly individualised community support should be designed to avoid relocation to residential services under supervision. The length of stay for readmissions was shorter than that for index admissions. The results also imply that discharge to the community contributes to improved clinical outcomes such as improved social functioning. The validity of retaining patients admitted because of the risk of rehospitalisation was considered low. Future research directions have also been discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:有心理健康问题的患者经历了许多进出医院的转变。
    目的:本综述研究评估精神病住院和社区卫生服务之间的临床护理路径。
    方法:我们使用了2009-2020年之间的出版物,以便对已发表的研究进行广泛的审查。确定了16篇评论文章,选择了12项主要研究,两者都是关于精神病医院和社区之间过渡的护理途径。
    结果:组织问题:确保在护理途径的每个阶段明确责任和透明度的系统和程序。
    方法:信息技术在客观上改善患者预后。信息/文档:在适当的时间为患者提供足够的结构化信息和书面计划。患者/家属:持续协作决策。临床护理和团队合作:心理健康和其他专业人员之间的合作,以确保计划的活动满足患者的需求。
    方法:尊重沟通,以患者为中心,不羞辱的照顾。
    结论:系统和程序确保明确的责任和透明度。信息技术支持决策和转诊,并客观地改善患者在护理途径中的预后。精神健康与其他专业人员之间的合作确保计划的活动满足患者的需求,并定期举行会议共享关键信息。全天候的救护车团队对过渡成功很重要。各方之间的知情共享决策,支持患者参与和尊重沟通。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with mental health problems experience numerous transitions into and out of hospital.
    OBJECTIVE: The review studies assessing clinical care pathways between psychiatric hospitalization and community health services.
    METHODS: We used publications between 2009-2020 to allow a broad scoping review of the published research. Sixteen review-articles were identified, 12 primary studies were chosen, both on care pathways in the transition between psychiatric hospital and community.
    RESULTS: Organizational issues: Systems and procedures to ensure clear responsibilities and transparency at each stage of the pathways of care.
    METHODS: Information-technology in objectively improving patient outcome. Information/documentation: Providing patients with adequate structured information and documented plans at the appropriate time. Patient/families: Continuous collaborative decision-making. Clinical care and teamwork: Collaboration between mental health and other professionals to guarantee that planned activities meet patient need.
    METHODS: Respectful communication and patient-centred, non-humiliating care.
    CONCLUSIONS: System and procedures ensure clear responsibilities and transparency. Information technology support decision-making and referral and objectively improve patient outcomes in care pathways. Collaboration between mental health and other professionals guarantee that planned activities meet patients\' needs along with regular meetings sharing key information. Around-the-clock ambulant-teams important to transition success. Informed-shared decision-making between parties, support patient participation and respectful communication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    远程,或电话-,在COVID-19大流行期间,咨询成为精神保健提供的必要形式。随着心理健康问题的患病率上升,他们可能在未来的心理健康服务中发挥作用。我们旨在回顾有关患者和提供者观点的文献,这些观点涉及影响有精神健康状况的社区居民实施远程咨询的因素。我们搜索了五个电子数据库(PubMed,EMBASE,WebofScience,CINAHL,和PsycINFO)用于截至7月13日的实证研究,2022年。只有同步的研究,通过视频进行的交互式远程咨询,电话,或纳入患者和医疗服务提供者之间的实时信息传递.两名评审员使用混合方法评估工具独立评估纳入研究的质量。我们将39项研究的定性和定量数据整合到一个单一的混合方法综合中。我们将报告的因素映射到实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的领域。参与者的接受度普遍较高,尽管人们担心护理质量和感知的治疗关系受阻。一个突出的促进因素是远程协商的可及性和便利性增加,虽然缺乏适当的基础设施以及患者舒适度和能力低下是最普遍的障碍。这篇评论强调了患者偏好和提供者对远程咨询未来的重要性。
    Remote, or tele-, consultations became a necessary form of mental healthcare provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. As the prevalence of mental health problems rises, they may have a role in future mental health services. We aimed to review the literature on patient and provider perspectives on factors influencing the implementation of remote consultations for community-dwelling people with mental health conditions. We searched five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) for empirical research up to July 13th, 2022. Only studies of synchronous, interactive remote consultations conducted via video, phone, or live-messaging between patients and providers were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We integrated qualitative and quantitative data from 39 studies into a single mixed-methods synthesis. We mapped reported factors to the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Acceptability was generally high among participants, despite concerns about the quality of care and the perceived impeded therapeutic relationship. A prominent facilitator was the increased accessibility and convenience of remote consultations, while lack of appropriate infrastructure and low patient comfort and competence were among the most prevalent barriers. This review highlights the importance of patient preferences and provider buy-in to the future of remote consultations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Of the 80% people with psychosis living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), up to 90% are left to the care of families. The World Health Organization has recommended the inclusion of families in community-based rehabilitation and while there is evidence of its implementation in LMICs, this has not been reviewed yet. This study aims to describe the key features and implementation strategies of family-based interventions in LMICs, and appraise their effectiveness.
    METHODS: Included are people with psychosis in LMICs who receive any form of family-based intervention, compared to their usual or absence of treatment, with patient outcome measures. We searched (August 2021) through Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, Social Policy and Practice, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), as well as from grey literature and hand-searched records. Risk of bias was assessed through the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), then analyzed narratively.
    RESULTS: 27 studies were included from the 5254 records. Psychotherapeutic features, systems approach and task-sharing were key intervention elements. Delivery strategies included preliminary research, sustained family engagement, and cultural adaptation. There were positive health impacts across four outcome domains.
    CONCLUSIONS: All studies recommended family-based interventions, with limitations in heterogeneity and 70% of them rated high risk of bias.
    UNASSIGNED: Review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021256856). The authors did not receive funding for this research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自1991年军事政权垮台以来,索马里一直没有一个有效的政府。多年的冲突,灾难,由于治理不善,不安全因素导致大多数健康指标的得分非常低,旷日持久的冲突,不发达,经济衰退,贫穷,社会和性别不平等,和环境退化。长达三十年的旷日持久的冲突导致了广泛的社会心理创伤,社会剥夺和药物滥用对心理健康造成毁灭性后果。世界卫生组织的一项研究表明,索马里是世界上精神疾病发病率最高的国家之一。这项研究的主要目的是协助决策者确定设计和实施干预措施的优先事项,以促进索马里的心理健康和社会心理健康。
    方法:该研究使用了系统的绘图技术(从1991年1月到2020年5月)和从公共领域收集的数据,收集,整理,并提供主要来自世卫组织全球卫生观察站的精神卫生数据。由于没有索马里公共卫生研究的主要数据库,本研究中用于心理健康的书目数据库包括Medline,PubMed,CINAHL,PsycINFO,谷歌学者。使用用于公共卫生的Web数据挖掘技术来提取数据。
    结果:索马里精神卫生相关问题的系统制图显示,与政策相关的决定因素和精神卫生服务占主导地位(74.4%),其次是与灾害相关的决定因素和妇女健康后果(39.3%)。2017年索马里综合医院(每10万人)的精神卫生床位数量为0.5,而东地中海地区(EMR)为6.4,全球为24。内战的最大伤亡之一是医疗保健方面的基本人力资源损失,因为大多数人要么逃离该国,要么是战争的受害者。
    结论:索马里心理健康问题的规模巨大,以及为解决本文概述的问题而制定的干预措施的优先指南,索马里政府及其国家/国际伙伴迫切需要优先考虑并强调需要在全国范围内投资预防和治疗精神疾病。
    BACKGROUND: Somalia has been without an effective government since the collapse of the military regime in 1991. Years of conflict, disasters, and insecurity have all contributed to very low scores for most health indicators due to poor governance, protracted conflict, underdevelopment, economic decline, poverty, social and gender inequality, and environmental degradation. The three-decade long protracted conflict has led to widespread psychosocial trauma, social deprivation and substance abuse with devastating consequences on mental health. A WHO study showed Somalia has one of the highest rates of mental illness in the world. The main aim of this study is to assist policy makers in setting priorities for the design and delivery of interventions to promote mental health and psychosocial wellbeing in Somalia.
    METHODS: The study uses a systematic mapping technique (from January 1991 to May 2020) and data collected from public domain, to collect, collate, and present mental health data mainly from WHO\'s Global Health Observatory. Since there is no primary database for Somalia\'s public health research, the bibliographic databases used for mental health in this study included Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. Data were extracted using techniques for web data mining for public health.
    RESULTS: Systematic mapping of mental health-related issues in Somalia showed that policy-related determinants and mental health services dominated (74.4%), followed by the disaster-related determinants and women\'s health consequences (39.3%). The ratio of the number of beds for mental health in general hospitals (per 100,000 population) in Somalia in 2017 is 0.5 compared to the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) at 6.4 and globally at 24. One of the biggest casualties of the civil war was loss of essential human resources in healthcare as most either fled the country or were part of the victims of the war.
    CONCLUSIONS: The vast scale of the mental health problems in Somalia and the priority setting guidelines for interventions to address the issues outlined in this paper, prompt a dire need that the Somali government and its national/international partners should prioritize and emphasize the need to invest in the prevention and the treatment of mental illness across the country.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社区被认为是改善健康的核心资源,跨学科,背景和条件。然而,这个术语的含义很少被批判性地探讨。在全球心理健康中,近年来,已经做出了相当大的努力来扩大“社区”方法,随着可变的成功,创造了更好地了解其使用方法的需要。我们的研究有助于这种需求,通过对与非洲环境中妇女心理健康服务相关的“社区”一词的研究进行严格审查。我们的评论探讨了过去15年的30篇同行评审文章,对证据质量进行了系统评估。然后,使用常规和定向内容分析的混合方法对研究进行分析,以揭示该术语在干预和现象学研究中的使用观点。我们确定了四大类社区:(1)地点(共享地理位置或机构隶属关系),(2)实践(对共享活动或职业的归属),(3)符号(与共享社区生活相关的含义和经验)和(4)身份(围绕精神健康状况的诊断身份)。分析确定了地点社区是整个样本中最常见的主要关注焦点,80%的论文引用了这个维度。我们注意到,在以实践社区为重点的研究中,这与利用当地知识为干预方案提供信息或支持服务提供有关,通常由外人设计。讨论了对未来政策和精神卫生服务研究的影响。
    Community is deemed a central resource for the improvement of health, across disciplines, contexts and conditions. However, what is meant by this term is rarely critically explored. In Global Mental Health, considerable efforts in recent years have been directed towards scaling up \'community\' approaches, with variable success, creating the need to better understand approaches to its use. Our study contributes to this need, through a critical review of studies engaging with the term \'community\' in relation to women\'s mental health services in African settings. Our review explored 30 peer-reviewed articles from the past 15 years, which were systematically evaluated for quality of evidence. Studies were then analysed using a blend of conventional and directed content analysis to unpack perspectives on the term\'s use in intervention and phenomenological studies. We identified four broad categories of community: (1) place (shared geographical location or institutional affiliation), (2) practice (belongingness to a shared activity or profession), (3) symbols (meanings and experiences associated with shared community life) and (4) identity (diagnostic identity around a mental health condition). Analysis identified community of place as the most common primary focus of interest across the sample, with 80% of papers referencing this dimension. We noted that in studies where communities of practice were the focus, this was in relation to leveraging local knowledge to inform or support service delivery of intervention programmes, often designed by outsiders. Implications for future policy and mental health services research are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号