Purpose: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a skin disease characterized by intensely itchy skin nodules and is associated with a significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This study aimed to estimate the HCRU of patients in England with PN overall and moderate-to-severe PN (MSPN) in particular.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Patients with Mild PN (MiPN) were matched to patients with MSPN by age and gender for the primary analysis. Patients were enrolled in the study between 1st April 2007 and 1st March 2019. All-cause HCRU was calculated, including primary and secondary care contacts and costs (cost-year 2022).
Results: Of 23,522 identified patients, 8,933 met the inclusion criteria, with a primary matched cohort of 2,479 PN patients. During follow up, the matched cohort\'s primary care visits were 21.27 per patient year (PPY) for MSPN group and 11.35 PPY for MiPN group. Any outpatient visits were 10.72 PPY and 4.87 PPY in MSPN and MiPN groups, respectively. Outpatient dermatology visits were 1.96 PPY and 1.14 PPY in MSPN and MiPN groups, respectively.
Conclusion: PN, especially MSPN, has a high HCRU burden in England, highlighting the need for new and improved disease management treatments.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic nodular prurigo (CNPG) is a recently defined and currently underdiagnosed disease with a variety of causes. It is associated with multiple comorbidities, and its management and treatment have improved with a better understanding of its pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with a series of patients with CNPG.
METHODS: Single-center, observational, retrospective study of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with CNPG seen at the dermatology department of a tertiary care hospital between 2009 and 2021.
RESULTS: We included 74 patients, mostly women (63.5%), with a mean age of 57 years. Overall, 39.2% of patients had a concomitant skin condition, mainly atopic dermatitis (62%). Other comorbidities included endocrine disorders (54.1%), cardiovascular disease (44.4%), and psychiatric disorders (36.5%). Skin biopsy helped confirm the clinical diagnosis in 70% of cases. The mean immunoglobulin E level was higher than normal (516IU/mL), regardless of atopic predisposition. On average, patients received three treatments, the most common choices being methotrexate, antihistamines, and topical and oral corticosteroids. Methotrexate was among the most effective options.
CONCLUSIONS: CNPG is a complex disease associated with multiple comorbidities. It requires a multidisciplinary approach, with the dermatologist at the center. Classical treatment approaches are probably insufficient.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic nodular prurigo (CNPG) is a recently defined and currently underdiagnosed disease with a variety of causes. It is associated with multiple comorbidities, and its management and treatment have improved with a better understanding of its pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with a series of patients with CNPG.
METHODS: Single-center, observational, retrospective study of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with CNPG seen at the dermatology department of a tertiary care hospital between 2009 and 2021.
RESULTS: We included 74 patients, mostly women (63.5%), with a mean age of 57 years. Overall, 39.2% of patients had a concomitant skin condition, mainly atopic dermatitis (62%). Other comorbidities included endocrine disorders (54.1%), cardiovascular disease (44.4%), and psychiatric disorders (36.5%). Skin biopsy helped confirm the clinical diagnosis in 70% of cases. The mean immunoglobulin E level was higher than normal (516 IU/mL), regardless of atopic predisposition. On average, patients received 3 treatments, the most common choices being methotrexate, antihistamines, and topical and oral corticosteroids. Methotrexate was among the most effective options.
CONCLUSIONS: CNPG is a complex disease associated with multiple comorbidities. It requires a multidisciplinary approach, with the dermatologist at the center. Classical treatment approaches are probably insufficient.

The aim of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, phase-II study was to determine the antipruritic effect of aprepitant vs. placebo in 58 patients with anti-histamine-refractory chronic pruritus in chronic nodular prurigo. Patients were randomized to receive either first oral aprepitant 80 mg/day or placebo for 4 weeks. Following a 2-week wash-out phase, the patients were crossed-over to receive the other treatment for 4 weeks. Primary efficacy criterion was the intra-individual difference between mean itch intensity (visual analogue scale) at baseline compared with the end of treatment period. Prurigo lesions, pruritus course, quality of life, patient benefits, and safety were secondary parameters. No significant differences were found between aprepitant treatment and placebo for any of the parameters investigated. Under the experimental conditions of the study, aprepitant, 80 mg daily for 4 weeks, did not have an antipruritic effect in patients with chronic prurigo. (DRKS00005594; EudraCT Number: 2013-001601-85).