Cardiotonic Agents

强心剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    VISmax与腹部大手术患者死亡率之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估腹部大手术患者VISmax与短期和长期全因死亡率之间的关系。计算VISmax(VISmax=多巴胺剂量[µg/kg/min]+多巴酚丁胺剂量[µg/kg/min]+100×肾上腺素剂量[µg/kg/min]+10×米力农剂量[µg/kg/min]+10,000×血管加压素剂量[单位/kg/min]+100×去甲肾上腺素[剂量/min/24次术后最大剂量))该研究包括512例首次入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者,这些患者在腹部大手术后接受了血管活性药物的治疗。数据是从重症监护IV数据库中的医疗信息集市中提取的。将VISmax分为五类:0-5、>5-15、>15-30、>30-45和>45。与最低VISmax(≤5)的患者相比,在完全校正的Cox模型中,高VISmax(>45)患者30日死亡率(风险比[HR]3.73,95%CI1.16~12.02;P=0.03)和1年死亡率(HR2.76,95%CI1.09~6.95;P=0.03)的风险增加.VISmax预测30天和1年死亡率的ROC分析得出的AUC值为0.69(95%CI0.64-0.75)和0.67(95%CI0.62-0.72),分别。总之,在接受大型腹部手术的患者中,入住ICU后24h内的VISmax升高与短期和长期死亡率的风险增加相关.
    The relationship between VISmax and mortality in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the association between VISmax and both short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, VISmax was calculated (VISmax = dopamine dose [µg/kg/min] + dobutamine dose [µg/kg/min] + 100 × epinephrine dose [µg/kg/min] + 10 × milrinone dose [µg/kg/min] + 10,000 × vasopressin dose [units/kg/min] + 100 × norepinephrine dose [µg/kg/min]) using the maximum dosing rates of vasoactives and inotropics within the first 24 h postoperative ICU admission. The study included 512 patients first admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who were administered vasoactive drugs after major abdominal surgery. The data was extracted from the medical information mart in intensive care-IV database. VISmax was stratified into five categories: 0-5, > 5-15, > 15-30, > 30-45, and > 45. Compared to patients with the lowest VISmax (≤ 5), those with the high VISmax (> 45) had an increased risk of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 3.73, 95% CI 1.16-12.02; P = 0.03) and 1-year mortality (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.09-6.95; P = 0.03) in fully adjusted Cox models. The ROC analysis for VISmax predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality yielded AUC values of 0.69 (95% CI 0.64-0.75) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.72), respectively. In conclusion, elevated VISmax within the first postoperative 24 h after ICU admission was associated with increased risks of both short-term and long-term mortality in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)可能会增加地高辛浓度,治疗指数狭窄的药物。地高辛浓度的微小变化可能使个体容易发生毒性风险。
    目的:研究TMP-SMX联合处方与阿莫西林联合处方后服用地高辛的老年人发生地高辛毒性的风险。
    方法:安大略省基于人群的回顾性队列研究,加拿大(2002-2020年)使用关联医疗保健数据。参与者包括47,961名服用地高辛的老年人(58%为女性;中位年龄80岁[四分位数范围74-86]),他们新接受TMP-SMX治疗(n=10,273),而新接受阿莫西林治疗的人(n=37,688)。
    方法:TMP-SMX与阿莫西林在老年人同时服用地高辛的联合处方。
    方法:主要结果是住院(即,入院或急诊科就诊)在抗生素处方后30天内出现地高辛毒性。使用倾向评分上的治疗加权的逆概率来平衡基线健康指标上的比较组。使用改进的Poisson回归获得加权风险比(RR),并使用二项回归获得加权风险差(RD)。伤害所需的数量(NNH)计算为1/RD。
    结果:TMP-SMX治疗的49/10,273(0.48%)患者与阿莫西林治疗的32/37,688(0.08%)患者(加权RR,5.71[95%置信区间(CI),3.19至10.24];加权RD,0.39%[95%CI,0.25%至0.53%];NNH256[95%CI,233至400])。
    结论:在服用地高辛的老年人中,与阿莫西林相比,共同处方的TMP-SMX在医院遇到地高辛毒性的30天风险高出近6倍,尽管绝对风险差异较低(0.4%).医生应在临床上适当时开一种替代抗生素。如果TMP-SMX必须与地高辛共同处方(如果认为益处大于风险),地高辛应该在个体基础上减少剂量。
    OBJECTIVE: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may increase digoxin concentration, a medication with a narrow therapeutic index. Small changes in digoxin concentration could predispose individuals to the risk of toxicity.
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of digoxin toxicity in older adults taking digoxin following co-prescription of TMP-SMX compared with co-prescription of amoxicillin.
    METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (2002-2020) using linked health care data. Participants comprised 47,961 older adults taking digoxin (58% women; median age 80 years [interquartile range 74-86]) who were newly treated with TMP-SMX (n = 10,273) compared with those newly treated with amoxicillin (n = 37,688).
    METHODS: Co-prescription of TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin in older adults concurrently taking digoxin.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was a hospital encounter (i.e., hospital admission or emergency department visit) with digoxin toxicity within 30 days of the antibiotic prescription. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Weighted risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression and weighted risk differences (RD) using binomial regression. The number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated as 1/RD.
    RESULTS: A hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity occurred in 49/10,273 (0.48%) patients treated with TMP-SMX versus 32/37,688 (0.08%) in those treated with amoxicillin (weighted RR, 5.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.19 to 10.24]; weighted RD, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.25% to 0.53%]; NNH 256 [95% CI, 233 to 400]).
    CONCLUSIONS: In older adults taking digoxin, the 30-day risk of a hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity was nearly 6 times higher in those co-prescribed TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin, although the absolute risk difference was low (0.4%). Physicians should prescribe an alternative antibiotic when clinically appropriate. If TMP-SMX must be co-prescribed with digoxin (if the benefit is believed to outweigh the risk), digoxin should be dose-reduced on an individual basis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前尚不清楚优化术中心脏指数是否能减少术后并发症。我们检验了以下假设:在择期大范围开腹手术的高危患者中,与常规护理相比,在手术期间和术后前8小时保持最佳的诱导后心脏指数可降低术后28天内并发症复合结局的发生率。
    方法:在三个德语中心和两个西班牙语中心,接受择期大范围开腹手术的高危患者在手术期间和术后前8小时随机接受心脏指数指导治疗,以维持最佳的诱导后心脏指数(脉压变化<12%时的心脏指数),使用静脉输液和多巴酚丁胺或接受常规护理.主要结果是术后28天内中度或重度并发症的复合结果的发生率。
    结果:我们分析了380名受试者中的318名。复合主要结局发生在分配给心脏指数指导治疗的152名受试者中的84名(55%)和分配给常规护理的166名受试者中的77名(46%)(比值比:1.87,95%置信区间:1.03-3.39,P=0.038)。按方案分析证实了主要结果分析的结果。
    结论:在手术期间和手术后的最初8小时内保持最佳的诱导后心脏指数并没有降低,可能会增加,与常规护理相比,接受择期大型腹部开放手术的高危患者在术后28天内并发症的复合结局发生率.临床医生不应努力在手术期间和手术后保持最佳的诱导后心脏指数,以减少并发症。
    背景:NCT03021525。
    BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether optimising intraoperative cardiac index can reduce postoperative complications. We tested the hypothesis that maintaining optimised postinduction cardiac index during and for the first 8 h after surgery reduces the incidence of a composite outcome of complications within 28 days after surgery compared with routine care in high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery.
    METHODS: In three German and two Spanish centres, high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery were randomised to cardiac index-guided therapy to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index (cardiac index at which pulse pressure variation was <12%) during and for the first 8 h after surgery using intravenous fluids and dobutamine or to routine care. The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite outcome of moderate or severe complications within 28 days after surgery.
    RESULTS: We analysed 318 of 380 enrolled subjects. The composite primary outcome occurred in 84 of 152 subjects (55%) assigned to cardiac index-guided therapy and in 77 of 166 subjects (46%) assigned to routine care (odds ratio: 1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.39, P=0.038). Per-protocol analyses confirmed the results of the primary outcome analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining optimised postinduction cardiac index during and for the first 8 h after surgery did not reduce, and possibly increased, the incidence of a composite outcome of complications within 28 days after surgery compared with routine care in high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery. Clinicians should not strive to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index during and after surgery in expectation of reducing complications.
    BACKGROUND: NCT03021525.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:ryanodine受体2(RyR2)存在于心脏和肾脏中,并在维持这些器官细胞中的细胞内Ca2稳态中起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在研究M201-A对RyR2的影响,以及在临床前和临床研究中研究其对心脏和肾功能的影响。
    方法:在施用M201-A(1,4-苯并硫氮杂-1-氧化物衍生物)后,我们通过RyR2监测了离体大鼠心肌细胞的舒张性Ca2渗漏和细胞内Ca2浓度以及动物的心脏和肾功能。在一项临床研究中,在健康男性中,M201-A以0.2和0.4mg·kg-1的剂量每天一次静脉内给药20分钟,连续四天,与血流动力学反应的评估。
    结果:在大鼠心脏细胞中,M201-A通过RyR2有效抑制自发性舒张Ca2泄漏,并对大鼠心脏表现出积极的肌力作用。此外,它增强了狗的钠尿和改善了肾功能。在人体临床研究中,当静脉给药时,M201-A显示尿钠增多,肾小球滤过率和肌酐清除率,同时保持可接受的药物安全性和耐受性水平。
    结论:新型药物M201-A通过RyR2抑制舒张性Ca2+渗漏,改善大鼠心脏肌力作用,和增强人类的利钠和肾功能。这些发现表明,该药物可能为慢性肾脏疾病和心力衰竭提供潜在的新治疗选择。
    OBJECTIVE: The ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2) is present in both the heart and kidneys, and plays a crucial role in maintaining intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis in cells in these organs. This study aimed to investigate the impact of M201-A on RyR2, as well as studying its effects on cardiac and renal functions in preclinical and clinical studies.
    METHODS: Following the administration of M201-A (1,4-benzothiazepine-1-oxide derivative), we monitored diastolic Ca2+ leak via RyR2 and intracellular Ca2+ concentration in isolated rat cardiomyocytes and in cardiac and renal function in animals. In a clinical study, M201-A was administered intravenously at doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg·kg-1 once daily for 20 min for four consecutive days in healthy males, with the assessment of haemodynamic responses.
    RESULTS: In rat heart cells, M201-A effectively inhibited spontaneous diastolic Ca2+ leakage through RyR2 and exhibited positive lusi-inotropic effects on the rat heart. Additionally, it enhanced natriuresis and improved renal function in dogs. In human clinical studies, when administered intravenously, M201-A demonstrated an increase in natriuresis, glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance, while maintaining acceptable levels of drug safety and tolerability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The novel drug M201-A inhibited diastolic Ca2+ leak via RyR2, improved cardiac lusi-inotropic effects in rats, and enhanced natriuresis and renal function in humans. These findings suggest that this drug may offer a potential new treatment option for chronic kidney disease and heart failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:右美托咪定(DEX)作为心脏保护剂在接受经典法洛四联症(TOF)修复的印度尼西亚儿童体外循环(CPB)中的疗效。
    方法:前瞻性,平行试验使用区组随机化和其他方双盲制备治疗剂。
    方法:国家心血管中心HarapanKita,印度尼西亚。
    方法:六十六名经典TOF患儿进行矫正手术。没有孩子被排除在外。所有患者均符合分析标准。
    方法:将总共0.5µg/kg的DEX推注添加到CPB引发溶液中,然后在旁路期间进行0.25µg/kg/h的维护。安慰剂组使用生理盐水。随访时间长达30天。
    结果:DEX组在CPB后6小时(30.48±19.33v42.73±27.16,p=0.039)和24小时(8.89±5.42v14.04±11.17,p=0.02)时肌钙蛋白I较低。在类似的时间范围内,DEX成功地降低了白细胞介素-6(分别为p=0.03;p=0.035)。在CPB后1、6和24小时,Dex组的乳酸较低(分别为p<0.01;p=0.048;p=0.035)。右美托咪定从旁路术后6小时开始增加心输出量和指数,但在全身血管阻力中反之亦然。在Dex组的重症监护病房监测期间,血管活性肌力评分降低(p=0.049)。然而,DEX对通气时间没有显著影响(p=0.313),重症监护病房住院(p=0.087),和死亡率(p>0.99)。
    结论:右美托咪定在CPB期间对TOF手术患儿是一种有效的心脏保护剂。术后死亡率在各组之间具有可比性。
    OBJECTIVE: Efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a cardioprotective agent in Indonesian children undergoing classic tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
    METHODS: A prospective, parallel trial using block randomization along with double-blinded preparation of treatment agents by other parties.
    METHODS: National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Indonesia.
    METHODS: Sixty-six children with classic TOF scheduled for corrective surgery. No children were excluded. All patients had fulfilled the criteria for analysis.
    METHODS: A total of 0.5 µg/kg bolus of DEX was added to the CPB priming solution, followed by 0.25 µg/kg/h maintenance during bypass. The placebo group used normal saline. Follow-ups were up to 30 days.
    RESULTS: Troponin I was lower in the DEX group at 6 hours (30.48 ± 19.33 v 42.73 ± 27.16, p = 0.039) and 24 hours after CPB (8.89 ± 5.42 v 14.04 ± 11.17, p = 0.02). Within a similar timeframe, DEX successfully lowered interleukin-6 (p = 0.03; p = 0.035, respectively). Lactate was lower in the Dex group at 1, 6, and 24 hours after CPB (p < 0.01; p = 0.048; p = 0.035; respectively). Dexmedetomidine increased cardiac output and index from 6 hours after bypass, but vice versa in systemic vascular resistance. Reduction of vasoactive inotropic score was seen during intensive care unit monitoring in the Dex group (p = 0.049). Nevertheless, DEX did not significantly affect the length of ventilation (p = 0.313), intensive care unit stay (p = 0.087), and mortality (p > 0.99).
    CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine during CPB is an effective cardioprotective agent in TOF children having surgery. Postoperative mortality was comparable across groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心肌梗塞(MI)或心脏病发作是由心肌中的急性或慢性长期缺血状况引起的。尽管有几个危险因素与MI病理生理学相关,危险因素之一是氧气供应不平衡。由于MI病理生理学的复杂性,目前可用的MI疗法仍然不足。丙酮酸激酶M2(PKM2)与许多CVD病理有关。然而,针对PKM2的特异性药物干预在MI中的作用尚未研究。因此,在这项研究中,我们探索了化合物3K的效果,PKM2特异性抑制剂,在异丙肾上腺素诱导的急性MI模型中。在这项研究中,为了在大鼠中诱发MI,异丙肾上腺素(ISO)以100mg/kg的剂量在两天内以24小时的间隔给药。化合物3K(2和4mg/kg),在MI大鼠中施用以研究其心脏保护潜力。在最后一次给药化合物3K后,使用PV环系统记录ECG和血液动力学参数。心脏组织学,西方印迹,和血浆心脏损伤标志物进行了评估,以阐明潜在的机制。化合物3K的治疗显著减少ISO诱导的ECG改变,心室功能,心脏损伤,梗死面积,和心脏纤维化。化合物3K处理产生PKM1表达的显著增加和PKM2表达的降低。此外,HIF-1α,caspase-3,c-Myc,和PTBP1表达在化合物3K处理后也降低。这项研究证明了化合物3K在MI中的心脏保护潜力,及其心脏保护作用机制。
    Myocardial infarction (MI) or heart attack arises from acute or chronic prolonged ischemic conditions in the myocardium. Although several risk factors are associated with MI pathophysiology, one of the risk factors is an imbalance in the oxygen supply. The current available MI therapies are still inadequate due to the complexity of MI pathophysiology. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) has been implicated in numerous CVDs pathologies. However, the effect of specific pharmacological intervention targeting PKM2 has not been studied in MI. Therefore, in this study, we explored the effect of compound 3K, a PKM2-specific inhibitor, in isoproterenol-induced acute MI model. In this study, in order to induce MI in rats, isoproterenol (ISO) was administered at a dose of 100 mg/kg over two days at an interval of 24 h. Specific PKM2 inhibitor, compound 3K (2 and 4 mg/kg), was administered in MI rats to investigate its cardioprotective potential. After the last administration of compound 3K, ECG and hemodynamic parameters were recorded using a PV-loop system. Cardiac histology, western blotting, and plasmatic cardiac damage markers were evaluated to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Treatment of compound 3K significantly reduced ISO-induced alterations in ECG, ventricular functions, cardiac damage, infarct size, and cardiac fibrosis. Compound 3K treatment produced significant increase in PKM1 expression and decrease in PKM2 expression. In addition, HIF-1α, caspase-3, c-Myc, and PTBP1 expression were also reduced after compound 3K treatment. This study demonstrates the cardioprotective potential of compound 3K in MI, and its mechanisms of cardioprotective action.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心血管疾病(CVD)是癌症幸存者发病和死亡的主要原因。心理健康被认为是影响心血管疾病治疗的重要危险因素。然而,对同时患有癌症和CVD的患者使用CVD二级预防策略知之甚少.本研究旨在比较初级保健慢性病管理计划的利用率,有和没有癌症的CVD患者的精神健康护理和指南指示的心脏保护药物。
    方法:回顾性横断面研究利用来自澳大利亚50个初级保健实践的CVD患者的临床数据。结果包括使用慢性病管理计划,精神卫生保健,指南指示的心脏保护药物和流感疫苗接种。Logistic回归,按实践计算人口统计学和临床协变量和聚类效应,对两组进行比较。
    结果:在15,040名CVD患者中,1,486名患者(9.9%)同时患有癌症。癌症患者,与没有的相比,年龄较大(77.6岁vs71.8岁,p<0.001),更有可能饮酒(62.6%对55.7%,p<0.001),收缩压较低(130.3±17.8vs132.5±21.1mmHg,p<0.001)和舒张压(72.2±11vs75.3±34mmHg,p<0.001)血压。虽然对两组都不理想,癌症患者更有可能有全科医学管理计划(GPMPs)(51.4%vs43.2%,p<0.001),团队护理安排(TCA)的协调(46.2%对37.0%,p<0.001),对GPMP或TCA进行审查(42.8%对34.7%,p<0.001),有心理健康治疗咨询(15.4%和10.5%,p=0.004)和处方降压药(70.1%vs66.0%,p=0.002)。然而,降脂或抗血小板药物的处方无统计学差异.在调整协变量和多重测试后,癌症患者的GPMPs没有表现出差异,TCA,以及对两者的回顾,但与没有癌症的患者相比,他们更有可能接受心理健康治疗咨询(比值比1.76;95%置信区间1.42-2.19).
    结论:少于一半的CVD患者有GPMP,TCA或审查两者之一。尽管那些癌症患者更有可能接受这些干预措施,大约一半的患者没有。医疗保险资助的GPMP,TCA和对GPMP或TCA的审查未得到充分利用,未来的研究应寻求确定改善获得这些服务的方法。
    BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. Mental health is considered an important risk factor affecting the treatment of cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about the use of secondary prevention strategies for CVD in patients with both cancer and CVD. This study aimed to compare the utilisation of primary care chronic disease management plans, mental health care and guideline-indicated cardioprotective medications among CVD patients with and without cancer.
    METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study utilising clinical data of patients with CVD from 50 Australian primary care practices. Outcomes included the use of chronic disease management plans, mental health care, guideline-indicated cardioprotective medications and influenza vaccination. Logistic regression, accounting for demographic and clinical covariates and clustering effects by practices, was used to compare the two groups.
    RESULTS: Of the 15,040 patients with CVD, 1,486 patients (9.9%) concurrently had cancer. Patients with cancer, compared to those without, were older (77.6 vs 71.8 years, p<0.001), more likely to drink alcohol (62.6% vs 55.7%, p<0.001), have lower systolic (130.3±17.8 vs 132.5±21.1 mmHg, p<0.001) and diastolic (72.2±11 vs 75.3±34 mmHg, p<0.001) blood pressure. Although suboptimal for both groups, patients with cancer were significantly more likely to have general practice management plans (GPMPs) (51.4% vs 43.2%, p<0.001), coordination of team care arrangements (TCAs) (46.2% vs 37.0%, p<0.001), have a review of either GPMP or TCA (42.8% vs 34.7%, p<0.001), have a mental health treatment consultation (15.4% vs 10.5%, p=0.004) and be prescribed blood pressure-lowering medications (70.1% vs 66.0%, p=0.002). However, there were no statistical differences in the prescription of lipid-lowering or antiplatelet medications. After adjustments for covariates and multiple testing, patients with cancer did not show a difference in GPMPs, TCAs, and a review of either, but were more likely to receive mental health treatment consultations than those without cancer (odds ratio 1.76; 95% confidence interval 1.42-2.19).
    CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of patients with CVD had a GPMP, TCA or review of either. Although those patients with cancer were more likely to receive these interventions, still around half the patients did not. Medicare-funded GPMPs, TCAs and a review of either GPMP or TCA were underutilised, and future studies should seek to identify ways of improving access to these services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号