Carbamazepine

卡马西平
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:Stevens-Johnson综合征(SJS)和中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)是由超敏药物反应引发的罕见但危及生命的皮肤病变。它们的特征是广泛的表皮坏死和皮肤脱落。暴发性1型糖尿病(FT1DM)的特征是由于严重破坏的β细胞功能而导致的高血糖症和酮症酸中毒的快速发作。作为SJS/TEN后遗症的暴发性1型糖尿病很少有报道。
    方法:我们介绍了一名73岁女性患者,服用卡马西平和苯妥英35天后出现SJS/TEN皮肤过敏反应。然后,停药20天后出现高血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒.极低的血清C肽水平(8.79pmol/l)和接近正常的糖基化血红蛋白水平符合暴发性T1DM的诊断标准。及时给予静脉免疫球蛋白(IVIG)和胰岛素,病人终于康复了。
    结论:这种罕见情况表明在SJS/TEN药物反应中需要监测血糖,和补液综合疗法,胰岛素,抗生素,IVIG可以改善预后。
    BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life-threatening skin lesion triggered by hypersensitive drug reaction. They are characterized by extensive epidermal necrosis and skin exfoliation. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (FT1DM) is featured by a rapid-onset of hyperglycemia with ketoacidosis due to severely destroyed β-cell function. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus as a sequela of SJS/TEN has rarely been reported.
    METHODS: We present a 73-year-old female patient who developed SJS/TEN skin allergic reaction after taking carbamazepine and phenytoin for 35 days. Then, hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis occurred 20 days after discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs. A very low serum C-peptide level (8.79 pmol/l) and a near-normal glycosylated hemoglobin level met the diagnostic criteria for fulminant T1DM. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and insulin were promptly administered, and the patient recovered finally.
    CONCLUSIONS: This rare case indicates that monitoring blood glucose is necessary in SJS/TEN drug reaction, and comprehensive therapy with rehydration, insulin, antibiotics, and IVIG may improve the prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精确估计患者的药物代谢能力对于抗癫痫剂量个性化很重要。
    量化与编码药物代谢酶的基因变体相关的抗癫痫药物的血浆浓度差异。
    PubMed,临床试验注册。欧盟,ClinicalTrials.gov,国际临床试验注册平台,和CENTRAL数据库在1990年1月1日至2023年9月30日的研究中进行了筛选,没有语言限制.
    两名评审员进行了独立的研究筛选,并评估了以下纳入标准:进行了适当的基因分型,基于基因型的分类为亚组是可能的,每个亚组至少有3名参与者.
    遵循流行病学观察性研究(MOOSE)指南的荟萃分析进行数据提取和后续质量,有效性,和偏见风险评估。纳入研究的结果与随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。
    用浓度-时间曲线下的剂量归一化面积对抗癫痫药物的血浆浓度进行定量,剂量归一化的稳态浓度,或标准剂量和采样时间单剂量后的浓度。通过将药物遗传学变体的载体和非载体的平均药物血浆浓度除以计算平均值的比率。
    来自98项研究的数据,涉及12543名接受苯妥英治疗的成年参与者,丙戊酸盐,拉莫三嗪,或卡马西平进行了分析。研究主要在东亚(69项研究)或白人或欧洲(15项研究)队列中进行。与参考亚组相比,观察到苯妥英的血浆浓度显着增加,CYP2C9中间代谢者的46%(95%CI,33%-61%),CYP2C19中间代谢物的20%(95%CI,17%-30%),CYP2C19代谢不良者为39%(95%CI,24%-56%);丙戊酸盐,CYP2C9中间代谢者的12%(95%CI,4%-20%),CYP2C19中间代谢者的12%(95%CI,2%-24%),CYP2C19代谢不良者占20%(95%CI,2%-41%);卡马西平,CYP3A5代谢不良者的12%(95%CI,3%-22%)。
    这项系统评价和荟萃分析发现,CYP2C9和CYP2C19基因型编码低酶容量与苯妥英血浆浓度的临床相关增加有关,几种药物遗传学变异与丙戊酸盐和卡马西平血药浓度的统计学显著相关,但仅有轻微的临床相关变化,许多药物遗传学变异与抗癫痫药物的血浆浓度无统计学显著差异。
    UNASSIGNED: Precise estimation of a patient\'s drug metabolism capacity is important for antiseizure dose personalization.
    UNASSIGNED: To quantify the differences in plasma concentrations for antiseizure drugs associated with variants of genes encoding drug metabolizing enzymes.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Clinicaltrialsregister.eu, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and CENTRAL databases were screened for studies from January 1, 1990, to September 30, 2023, without language restrictions.
    UNASSIGNED: Two reviewers performed independent study screening and assessed the following inclusion criteria: appropriate genotyping was performed, genotype-based categorization into subgroups was possible, and each subgroup contained at least 3 participants.
    UNASSIGNED: The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed for data extraction and subsequent quality, validity, and risk-of-bias assessments. The results from the included studies were pooled with random-effect meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Plasma concentrations of antiseizure drugs were quantified with the dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve, the dose-normalized steady state concentration, or the concentrations after a single dose at standardized dose and sampling time. The ratio of the means was calculated by dividing the mean drug plasma concentrations of carriers and noncarriers of the pharmacogenetic variant.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 98 studies involving 12 543 adult participants treated with phenytoin, valproate, lamotrigine, or carbamazepine were analyzed. Studies were mainly conducted within East Asian (69 studies) or White or European (15 studies) cohorts. Significant increases of plasma concentrations compared with the reference subgroup were observed for phenytoin, by 46% (95% CI, 33%-61%) in CYP2C9 intermediate metabolizers, 20% (95% CI, 17%-30%) in CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, and 39% (95% CI, 24%-56%) in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers; for valproate, by 12% (95% CI, 4%-20%) in CYP2C9 intermediate metabolizers, 12% (95% CI, 2%-24%) in CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, and 20% (95% CI, 2%-41%) in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers; and for carbamazepine, by 12% (95% CI, 3%-22%) in CYP3A5 poor metabolizers.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genotypes encoding low enzymatic capacity were associated with a clinically relevant increase in phenytoin plasma concentrations, several pharmacogenetic variants were associated with statistically significant but only marginally clinically relevant changes in valproate and carbamazepine plasma concentrations, and numerous pharmacogenetic variants were not associated with statistically significant differences in plasma concentrations of antiseizure drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)很常见,给患者带来了巨大的负担,看护者,和卫生系统。然而,治疗BPSD的药物选择很少。我们对抗惊厥药对BPSD疗效的临床试验进行了系统评价。
    方法:我们搜索了5个电子数据库,直到2023年1月,用于评估非苯二氮卓抗惊厥药治疗BPSD的疗效的随机对照试验和系统评价。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具来确定纳入试验的偏倚风险。因为使用荟萃分析对结果进行统计汇集是不可行的,我们使用Cochrane合成无荟萃分析报告指南综合了研究结果。
    结果:我们确定了12项研究,包括随机对照试验(RCTs)和1个系统评价。最近的Cochrane评论合成了五个评估丙戊酸的RCT,得出的结论是该药物可能对BPSD无效。我们从6项试验中提取了数据,涉及248人,比较了非苯二氮卓抗惊厥药与安慰剂或利培酮。四项试验(n=97名参与者)评估了卡马西平,其中只有一个在简短的精神病学评定量表测量躁动方面有所改善,敌意,精神病,和戒断/抑郁(效应大小:1.13;95%置信区间[CI]:0.54-1.73)相对于安慰剂。相对于安慰剂(5/24;21%),接受卡马西平的患者(20/27;74%)的不良反应更为常见。有低质量的证据表明奥卡西平可能无效,托吡酯可能与利培酮相当。
    结论:抗惊厥药不太可能对BPSD有效,尽管现有证据的质量很低。
    OBJECTIVE: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common and impart a significant burden to patients, caregivers, and the health system. However, there are few pharmacological options for treating BPSD. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials examining the efficacy of anticonvulsants in BPSD.
    METHODS: We searched five electronic databases through January 2023, for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants for the treatment of BPSD. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to ascertain the risk of bias in included trials. Because statistical pooling of results using meta-analysis was not feasible, we synthesized findings using the Cochrane Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidelines.
    RESULTS: We identified 12 studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 systematic review. Five RCTs evaluating valproic acid were synthesized by a recent Cochrane review which concluded that this drug is likely ineffective for BPSD. We extracted data from 6 trials involving 248 individuals comparing non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants to either placebo or risperidone. Four trials (n = 97 participants) evaluated carbamazepine, only one of which demonstrated an improvement in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale measuring agitation, hostility, psychosis, and withdrawal/depression (effect size: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-1.73) relative to placebo. Adverse effects were more common in patients receiving carbamazepine (20/27; 74%) relative to placebo (5/24; 21%). There is low quality evidence that oxcarbazepine is likely ineffective and that topiramate may be comparable to risperidone.
    CONCLUSIONS: Anticonvulsants are unlikely to be effective in BPSD, although the quality of existing evidence is low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:卡马西平(CBZ)代谢和癫痫抵抗与CYP3A5(rs776746和rs15524)和CYP3A4(rs2242480,rs2740574,rs35599367,rs12721627和rs28371759)的遗传多态性之间的关联一直是有争议的研究主题。我们进行了系统评价,以评估这些多态性与CBZ代谢和抗性之间的潜在联系。
    方法:确定相关研究,在PubMed进行海湾搜索,Scopus,PharmGKB,EPIGAD,和Pharmadme数据库,直到2023年6月。我们分析中包括的研究调查了CYP3A5(rs776746和rs15524)和CYP3A4(rs224242480,rs2740574,rs35599367,rs12721627和rs28371759)多态性与CBZ代谢和抗性之间的联系。
    结果:本综述共包括23项研究和超过2177例癫痫患者。结果CYP3A4(rs12721627和rs28371759)多态性与降低的催化活性有关,其中CYP3A4(rs2740574)多态性与较低水平的CBZ-二醇和降低的活性有关。还发现CYP3A5(rs776746)多态性影响CBZ的剂量调节血浆水平。
    结论:尽管这些发现强调了CYP3A4和CYP3A5基因的遗传变异对CBZ药代动力学和药效学的影响,不同人群的进一步研究对于在临床环境中加强个性化癫痫治疗至关重要.
    OBJECTIVE: The association between carbamazepine (CBZ) metabolism and resistance in epilepsy and the genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 (rs776746 and rs15524) and CYP3A4 (rs2242480, rs2740574, rs35599367, rs12721627, and rs28371759) has been the subject of previous investigations with controversial results. We conducted a systematic review to assess the potential link between these polymorphisms and CBZ metabolism and resistance.
    METHODS: Identifying relevant studies, was carried out bay searching PubMed, Scopus, PharmGKB, EPIGAD, and PHARMAADME databases up until June 2023. The studies included in our analysis investigated the connection between CYP3A5 (rs776746 and rs15524) and CYP3A4 (rs2242480, rs2740574, rs35599367, rs12721627, and rs28371759) polymorphisms and CBZ metabolism and resistance.
    RESULTS: This review included a total of 23 studies and more than 2177 epilepsy patients. As a result the CYP3A4 (rs12721627 and rs28371759) polymorphisms are associated with reduced catalytic activity, where the CYP3A4 (rs2740574) polymorphism is linked to lower levels of CBZ-diol and decreased activity. It\'s been found also that the CYP3A5 (rs776746) polymorphism influences the dose-adjusted plasma levels of CBZ.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings highlight the impact of genetic variations in the CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes on CBZ pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, further studies across diverse populations are essential to enhance personalized epilepsy therapy in clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目的是确定与卡马西平相关的白细胞增多症的发生率,拉莫三嗪,还有苯巴比妥.数据来源:在PubMed的医学参考馆员的协助下进行了全面的文献综述,MEDLINE,Embase,至2023年6月,谷歌学者使用以下搜索术语:\"白细胞增多症/化学诱导\"[MeSH术语]和(\"抗惊厥药\"[MeSH术语]或(\"抗惊厥药\"[药理作用]或\"抗惊厥药\"[MeSH术语]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\研究选择和数据提取:根据应用纳入和排除标准,我们的文献综述的64个潜在结果包括13个报告:其中7个报告涉及卡马西平,其中4份报告涉及拉莫三嗪,其中2份报告涉及苯巴比妥。数据综合:药物诱导的白细胞增多通常是一种排除性诊断,是一种对患者和临床医生在床边有许多影响的现象。包括强制进行全面的传染性评估,混杂变量的识别,以及最终停止犯罪的代理人。尽管有几种药物和药物类别具有这种不良药物作用,在文献中尚未阐明与抗惊厥药物相关的药物诱导白细胞增多的具体临床表现和管理策略的评估.结论:临床医生在评估潜在沉淀药物患者的白细胞增多时应谨慎,包括卡马西平,拉莫三嗪,还有苯巴比妥.
    Objective: The objective was to determine the incidence of leukocytosis associated with carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and phenobarbital. Data sources: A comprehensive literature review was conducted with the assistance of a medical reference librarian on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar through June 2023 using the following search terminology: \"leukocytosis/chemically induced\"[MeSH Terms] AND (\"Anticonvulsants\"[MeSH Terms] OR (\"Anticonvulsants\"[Pharmacological Action] OR \"Anticonvulsants\"[MeSH Terms] OR \"Anticonvulsants\"[All Fields] OR \"anticonvulsant\"[All Fields] OR \"anticonvulsion\"[All Fields] OR \"anticonvulsive\"[All Fields] OR \"anticonvulsives\"[All Fields]) OR (\"Anticonvulsants\"[Pharmacological Action] OR \"Anticonvulsants\"[MeSH Terms] OR \"Anticonvulsants\"[All Fields] OR \"antiepileptic\"[All Fields] OR \"antiepileptics\"[All Fields])). Study selection and data extraction: Thirteen reports were included from 64 potential results of our literature review following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria: 7 of the reports involved carbamazepine, 4 of the reports involved lamotrigine, and 2 of the reports involved phenobarbital. Data synthesis: Drug-induced leukocytosis is commonly a diagnosis of exclusion and is a phenomenon that has numerous ramifications to patients and clinicians at the bedside, including mandating a full infectious evaluation, the identification of confounding variables, and the eventual discontinuation of the offending agent. Despite several medications and medication classes possessing this adverse drug effect, an evaluation of the specific clinical presentation and management strategies for drug-induced leukocytosis associated with anticonvulsant medications has not been elucidated in the literature. Conclusions: Clinicians should be judicious when evaluating leukocytosis in patients on potentially precipitating medications, including carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and phenobarbital.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癫痫发作是中枢神经系统(CNS)的常见症状,可能由感染(如毒素)或药物引起。
    目的:本研究的目的是对感染之间的关系进行系统评价。癫痫发作,和毒品。
    方法:到2024年2月18日,根据PRISMA指南并基于PICO标准格式,相关,选择了深入的后续指导方法和基于证据的选项,这些选项与知识渊博的当前集合相关联,高质量的手稿
    结果:由于感染引起的抑制性和兴奋性神经递质之间的失衡,药物如替卡西林,阿莫西林,苯唑西林,青霉素G,氨苄青霉素,曲马多,文拉法辛,环孢菌素,他克莫司,阿昔洛韦,cellcept,老一代的抗癫痫药物,比如卡马西平,苯妥英,和许多其他药物可引起不同阶段的中枢神经系统紊乱,从癫痫发作到脑病。感染可通过持续持续发作超过5分钟或反复发作引起危及生命的癫痫持续状态。脑膜炎,结核病,单纯疱疹,脑弓形虫病,和许多其他可能导致癫痫持续状态。事实上,混乱,脑病,据报道,药物会导致肌阵鸣,比如替卡西林,阿莫西林,苯唑西林,青霉素G,氨苄青霉素,和其他人。据报道,青霉素G具有最大的致癫痫潜能。高剂量,除了长时间使用甲硝唑,报告有癫痫感染。美罗培南可以降低丙戊酸的浓度。由于细胞色素P4503A4的抑制,克拉霉素和红霉素与卡马西平的组合需要警惕监测。
    结论:由于药物代谢的变化,联合使用抗癫痫药物和抗生素可能导致癫痫发作风险增加.在脑囊虫病患者中,脑型疟疾,病毒性脑炎,细菌性脑膜炎,结核病,和人类免疫缺陷病毒,这项循证研究推荐了不同的机制来介导毒素和药物的致癫痫特性.
    BACKGROUND: Seizures are a common presenting symptom of the central nervous system (CNS) and could occur from infections (such as toxins) or drugs.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to present a systematic review of the association between infections, seizures, and drugs.
    METHODS: Through February 18, 2024, according to the PRISMA guidelines and based on the PICO standard format, relevant, in-depth consequent guide approach and evidence-based options were selected associated with a knowledgeable collection of current, high-quality manuscripts.
    RESULTS: Imbalance between inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters due to infections, drugs such as ticarcillin, amoxicillin, oxacillin, penicillin G, ampicillin, tramadol, venlafaxine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, acyclovir, cellcept, the old generation of antiepileptic drugs, such as carbamazepine, phenytoin, and many other drugs could cause different stages of CNS disturbances ranging from seizure to encephalopathy. Infections could cause life-threatening status epilepticus by continuous unremitting seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes or recurrent seizures. Meningitis, tuberculosis, herpes simplex, cerebral toxoplasmosis, and many others could lead to status epilepticus. In fact, confusion, encephalopathy, and myoclonus were reported with drugs, such as ticarcillin, amoxicillin, oxacillin, penicillin G, ampicillin, and others. Penicillin G was reported as having the greatest epileptogenic potential. A high dose, in addition to prolonged use of metronidazole, was reported with seizure infection. Meropenem could decrease the concentration of valproic acid. Due to the inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4, the combination of clarithromycin and erythromycin with carbamazepine needs vigilant monitoring.
    CONCLUSIONS: Due to changes in drug metabolism, co-administration of antiseizure drugs and antibiotics may lead to an enhanced risk of seizures. In patients with neurocysticercosis, cerebral malaria, viral encephalitis, bacterial meningitis, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus, the evidence-based study recommended different mechanisms mediating epileptogenic properties of toxins and drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:这篇综述旨在比较三种治疗方法的有效性:BTXA,CBZ,OXB,治疗三叉神经痛(TN)。
    方法:我们在几个数据库中使用特定的关键词对与我们的问题相关的研究文章进行了彻底的搜索,包括Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,科学直接,Scopus,PubMed,Elsevier,Springer期刊,OvidMedline,EBSCO,和WebofScience。我们的重点是1965年至2023年的出版物。
    结果:我们从搜索中检索到46篇文章,并仔细审阅。在这些中,我们选择了29篇符合纳入标准的文章.在选定的文章中,11调查了CBZ和OXB的影响,18人探讨了BTXA对TN症状改善的影响。CBZ的应答率介于56%和90.5%之间,OXB的应答率介于90.9%和94%之间。BTXA的应答率介于51.4%和100%之间。这三种处理对TN的改善均有显著的效果。重要的是,研究结果强调,在某些情况下,CBZ和OXB的副作用可能导致治疗中断,而BTXA的副作用很小,频率也较低。
    结论:因此,BTXA成为TN治疗的有希望的替代方案。然而,需要额外的临床试验来验证这一发现,需要进一步研究以建立在TN中施用BTXA的标准化方案。
    This review aimed to compare the effectiveness of three treatments: BTX A, CBZ, and OXB, in managing trigeminal neuralgia (TN).
    We conducted a thorough search for research articles related to our issue using specific keywords on several databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, Elsevier, Springer Journals, Ovid Medline, EBSCO, and Web of Science. Our focus was on publications from 1965 to 2023.
    We retrieved 46 articles from the search and reviewed them carefully. Out of these, we selected 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Among the selected articles, 11 investigated the effects of CBZ and OXB, while 18 explored the impact of BTX A on the improvement of TN symptoms. The response rate ranged between 56% and 90.5% for CBZ and between 90.9% and 94% for OXB. The response rate for BTX A ranged between 51.4% and 100%. All these three treatments had a remarkable effect on the improvement of TN. Importantly, findings highlighted that side effects of CBZ and OXB could lead to treatment discontinuation in some cases, whereas BTX A\'s side effects have been minimal and less frequent.
    Consequently, BTX A emerges as a promising alternative for TN treatment. However, additional clinical trials are necessary to validate this finding, and further research is required to establish a standardized protocol for administering BTX A in TN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Asterixis是一种阴性肌阵挛症的亚型,其特征是短暂的,由于肌肉收缩的不自主停顿,持续姿势的心律失常失误。我们进行了叙述性审查,以描述关于命名法的进一步星号,历史方面,病因学,病理生理学,分类,诊断,和治疗。在文献和以前的文章中,Asterixis已被经典地用作负肌阵挛症的同义词。然而,区分星号和其他亚型的负型肌阵挛症是很重要的,例如,癫痫阴性肌阵鸣,因为管理可以改变。Asterixis不是特定于任何病理生理过程,但更常见于肝性脑病,肾功能衰竭和呼吸衰竭,脑血管疾病,以及可能导致高氨血症的药物,如丙戊酸,卡马西平,还有苯妥英.Asterixis通常无症状,患者不会自发报告。这突出了在脑病患者的身体检查中积极寻找这种体征的重要性,因为它可能表明潜在的毒性或代谢原因。Asterixis通常在治疗潜在原因后是可逆的。
    Asterixis is a subtype of negative myoclonus characterized by brief, arrhythmic lapses of sustained posture due to involuntary pauses in muscle contraction. We performed a narrative review to characterize further asterixis regarding nomenclature, historical aspects, etiology, pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis, and treatment. Asterixis has been classically used as a synonym for negative myoclonus across the literature and in previous articles. However, it is important to distinguish asterixis from other subtypes of negative myoclonus, for example, epileptic negative myoclonus, because management could change. Asterixis is not specific to any pathophysiological process, but it is more commonly reported in hepatic encephalopathy, renal and respiratory failure, cerebrovascular diseases, as well as associated with drugs that could potentially lead to hyperammonemia, such as valproic acid, carbamazepine, and phenytoin. Asterixis is usually asymptomatic and not spontaneously reported by patients. This highlights the importance of actively searching for this sign in the physical exam of encephalopathic patients because it could indicate an underlying toxic or metabolic cause. Asterixis is usually reversible upon treatment of the underlying cause.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多人寻求医疗护理耳鸣,渴望从这种情况引起的痛苦中解脱出来;然而,治疗过程远非简单明了。慢性主观性耳鸣最有效的治疗方法,如耳鸣再训练疗法(TRT)和认知行为疗法(CBT),需要相当多的时间和努力。因此,他们中的许多人表达了通过药物缓解的愿望。虽然在慢性主观性耳鸣的治疗指南中通常不推荐药物治疗,在特定情况下,例如伴有抑郁症或焦虑症状时,抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药等药物可能对症状的减轻产生有意义的影响。此外,药物可以证明对某些特殊形式的耳鸣有效,比如打字机耳鸣,与慢性主观性耳鸣相反。尽管据报道,与安慰剂相比,鼓室内注射地塞米松治疗耳鸣缺乏疗效,如果患者由于安慰剂效应而感到主观满意度,它具有重要意义。从耳鸣患者的角度来看,即使治疗机制被搁置,通过某些药物获得一定程度的缓解可以提高对TRT和CBT等循证治疗的依从性.
    Many individuals seek medical attention for tinnitus, desiring relief from the distress caused by the condition; however, the treatment process is far from straightforward. The most effective treatments for chronic subjective tinnitus, such as tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), require considerable time and efforts. As a result, many of them express a desire for alleviation through medication. While it is true that medication is not generally recommended in treatment guidelines for chronic subjective tinnitus, in specific situations such as when accompanied by symptoms of depression or anxiety-drugs like antidepressants or anxiolytics may have a meaningful impact on symptom reduction. Additionally, medication can prove effective in certain specialized forms of tinnitus, such as typewriter tinnitus, as opposed to chronic subjective tinnitus. Although intratympanic dexamethasone injections for tinnitus have been reported to lack efficacy compared to a placebo, if patients perceive subjective satisfaction due to a placebo effect, it holds significance. From the perspective of patients suffering from tinnitus, even if the therapeutic mechanism is set aside, experiencing some degree of relief through certain medications can enhance compliance with evidence-based treatments like TRT and CBT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本综述旨在总结HLA*1502等位基因与抗癫痫药物诱导的Stevens-Johnson综合征(SJS)和中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)之间的关系。
    方法:发布,在2023年5月搜索了Scopus和EMBASE的合格评论。两位作者独立筛选了标题和摘要,并评估了全文评论的资格。通过评估系统评论2的方法学质量和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估荟萃分析和病例对照研究的质量,分别。分析了每种抗癫痫药物的叙事总结。预先建立的方案已在国际前瞻性系统审查注册中心注册(ID:CRD42023403957)上注册。
    结果:纳入的研究是系统评价,meta分析和病例对照研究评估HLA-B*1502等位基因与以下抗癫痫药的关联。卡马西平的七项荟萃分析,拉莫三嗪(LTG)的三项荟萃分析,奥卡西平的三项病例对照研究,纳入了9项苯妥英病例对照研究和4项苯巴比妥病例对照研究.这项综述的结果表明,卡马西平和奥卡西平的HLA-B-1502与SJS/TEN之间存在很强的相关性,拉莫三嗪和苯妥英的相关性较温和。
    结论:总之,尽管与卡马西平诱导的SJS/TEN相比,HLA-B*1502不太可能与苯妥英或拉莫三嗪诱导的SJS/TEN相关,这是一个重要的风险因素,如果仔细筛查,可能会减少SJS/TEN的开发。鉴于潜在的发病率和死亡率,HLA-B*1502测试可能对开始拉莫三嗪/苯妥英治疗的患者有益。然而,需要进一步的研究来检查其他等位基因与SJS/TEN发展的关联,并探索在治疗开始前进行全基因组关联研究的可能性.
    OBJECTIVE: This umbrella review was conducted to summarize the association between HLA*1502 allele with antiepileptic induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).
    METHODS: Pubmed, Scopus and EMBASE were searched for eligible reviews in May 2023. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text reviews for eligibility. The quality of meta-analyses and case-control studies was appraised with Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Narrative summaries of each antiepileptic drug were analyzed. Preestablished protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registry(ID: CRD42023403957).
    RESULTS: Included studies are systematic reviews, meta-analyses and case-control studies evaluating the association of HLA-B*1502 allele with the following antiepileptics. Seven meta-analyses for carbamazepine, three meta-analyses for lamotrigine (LTG), three case-control studies for oxcarbazepine, nine case-control studies for phenytoin and four case-control studies for phenobarbitone were included. The findings of this umbrella review suggest that there is a strong association between HLA-B-1502 with SJS/TEN for carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine and a milder association for lamotrigine and phenytoin.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, although HLA-B*1502 is less likely to be associated with phenytoin or lamotrigine-induced SJS/TEN compared to carbamazepine-induced SJS/TEN, it is a significant risk factor that if carefully screened, could potentially reduce the development of SJS/TEN. In view of potential morbidity and mortality, HLA-B*1502 testing may be beneficial in patients who are initiating lamotrigine/phenytoin therapy. However, further studies are required to examine the association of other alleles with the development of SJS/TEN and to explore the possibility of genome-wide association studies before initiation of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号