CVD, cardiovascular disease

CVD,心血管疾病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在回顾自2009年中国卫生体制改革以来中国在初级卫生保健(PHC)层面的非传染性疾病(NCD)预防和控制方面的国家政策。筛选了来自中国国务院和20个部委官方网站的政策文件,其中包括1,799人中的151人。进行了主题内容分析,确定了十四个“主要政策举措”,包括基本健康保险计划和基本公共卫生服务。几个领域显示出强有力的政策支持,包括服务交付,卫生筹资,领导/治理。与世卫组织的建议相比,仍然存在一些差距,包括缺乏对多部门合作的重视,未充分利用非卫生专业人员,缺乏以质量为导向的PHC服务评估。在过去的十年里,中国继续表现出加强非传染性疾病预防和控制PHC系统的政策承诺。我们建议未来的政策,以促进多部门合作,加强社区参与,完善绩效评价机制。
    This study aims to review China\'s national policies related to non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention and control at the primary health care (PHC) level since China\'s 2009 health system reform. Policy documents from official websites of China\'s State Council and 20 affiliated ministries were screened, where 151 out of 1,799 were included. Thematic content analysis was performed, and fourteen \'major policy initiatives\' were identified, including the basic health insurance schemes and essential public health services. Several areas showed to have strong policy support, including service delivery, health financing, and leadership/governance. Compared with WHO recommendations, several gaps remain, including lack of emphasis on multi-sectoral collaboration, underuse of non-health-professionals, and lack of quality-oriented PHC services evaluations. Over the past decade, China continues to demonstrate its policy commitment to strengthen the PHC system for NCD prevention and control. We recommend future policies to facilitate multi-sectoral collaboration, enhance community engagement, and improve performance evaluation mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是癌症幸存者心血管负担的重要原因。这篇综述确定了可以帮助指导有关筛查的益处的决策的特征,以评估亚临床CAD的风险或存在。根据危险因素和炎症负担,筛选可能适用于选定的幸存者。在接受基因检测的癌症幸存者中,多基因风险评分和克隆造血标志物可能成为未来有用的CAD风险预测工具。癌症的类型(尤其是乳腺癌,血液学,胃肠,和泌尿生殖系统)和治疗的性质(放射治疗,铂剂,氟尿嘧啶,激素治疗,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,内皮生长因子抑制剂,和免疫检查点抑制剂)在确定风险方面也很重要。积极筛查的治疗意义包括生活方式和动脉粥样硬化干预,在特定情况下,可能需要进行血运重建。
    Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important contributor to the cardiovascular burden in cancer survivors. This review identifies features that could help guide decisions about the benefit of screening to assess the risk or presence of subclinical CAD. Screening may be appropriate in selected survivors based on risk factors and inflammatory burden. In cancer survivors who have undergone genetic testing, polygenic risk scores and clonal hematopoiesis markers may become useful CAD risk prediction tools in the future. The type of cancer (especially breast, hematological, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary) and the nature of treatment (radiotherapy, platinum agents, fluorouracil, hormonal therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, endothelial growth factor inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors) are also important in determining risk. Therapeutic implications of positive screening include lifestyle and atherosclerosis interventions, and in specific instances, revascularization may be indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暴露于慢性压力会增加心血管疾病(CVD)的风险。提供非正式护理被认为是一项有压力的活动,但目前尚不清楚非正式护理是否与CVD风险相关。本系统评价旨在总结和评估与非护理人员相比,向他人提供非正式护理与CVD发病率之间的关系的定量证据。通过搜索六个电子文献数据库(CINAHL,Embase,全球卫生,OVIDMedline,Scopus,和WebofScience)。两名审稿人根据一套先验资格标准评估了1887份摘要和34份全文文章,以确定要纳入的文章。使用ROBINS-E偏倚风险工具对纳入研究进行质量评估。确定了九项研究,与不提供非正式护理相比,定量评估了提供非正式护理与CVD发病率之间的关系。总的来说,在这些研究中,护理人员和非护理人员的CVD发生率无差异.然而,在检查护理提供强度(小时数/周)的研究亚组中,与非护理人员相比,最高强度护理组的CVD发生率更高.一项研究仅检查了与CVD相关的死亡率结果,观察到与非护理人员相比护理人员的死亡率降低。需要更多的研究来探索非正式护理与CVD发病率之间的关系。
    Exposure to chronic stress increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Providing informal care is known to be a stressful activity, but it is not clear whether informal caregiving is associated with CVD risk. This systematic review aimed to summarise and assess the quantitative evidence examining the association between providing informal care to others and CVD incidence in comparison with non-carers. Eligible articles were detected by searching six electronic literature databases (CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, OVID Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science). Two reviewers appraised 1887 abstracts and 34 full-text articles against a set of a priori eligibility criteria to identify articles for inclusion. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the ROBINS-E risk of bias tool. Nine studies were identified that quantitatively assessed the association between providing informal care and CVD incidence in comparison to not providing informal care. Overall, there was no difference in the incidence of CVD between carers and non-carers across these studies. However, within the subgroup of studies that examined care provision intensity (hours/week) higher CVD incidence was observed for the most intense caregiving group compared to non-carers. One study examined only CVD-related mortality outcomes, observing a reduction in mortality for carers compared to non-carers. More research is required to explore the relationship between informal care and CVD incidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)与死亡率增加和高临床负担相关。NASH对患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)产生不利影响,但是关于疾病的人文负担的公开数据是有限的。这篇综述旨在总结和严格评估NASH人群中报告HRQoL或患者报告结果(PRO)的研究,并确定进一步研究的关键差距。
    未经批准:Medline,EMBASE,我们在Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO中搜索了2010年至2021年出版的英文出版物,这些出版物报告了NASH患者人群或亚人群的HRQoL/PRO结局.
    UNASSIGNED:确定了25篇出版物,涵盖了23项独特的研究。总的来说,数据显示NASH对HRQoL有重大影响,特别是在身体机能和疲劳方面,随着NASH的进展,身心健康恶化。常见症状,包括疲劳,腹痛,焦虑/抑郁,认知问题,睡眠质量差,对患者的工作能力和日常生活活动能力以及人际关系质量产生不利影响。然而,由于缺乏患者的意识和教育,一些患者未能将症状归因于他们的疾病。NASH与肥胖和2型糖尿病等合并症的高发率相关,这有助于降低HRQoL。就诊断方法而言,研究是异质的,人口,结果,随访时间,以及HRQoL/效用的衡量标准。大多数研究在质量评估中被评为“中等”,所有可评估的研究都对混杂因素控制不足.
    UNASSIGNED:NASH与显著的HRQoL负担相关,在病程早期开始并随疾病进展而增加。需要更有力的研究来更好地了解NASH的人文负担,对可能影响结果的混杂因素进行充分调整。
    UNASSIGNED:非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)对生活质量有重大影响,与普通人群相比,个人的身心健康状况更差。NASH及其症状,其中包括疲倦,胃痛,焦虑,抑郁症,注意力和记忆力差,睡眠受损,影响个人关系和工作和执行日常任务的能力。然而,并非所有患者都知道他们的症状可能与NASH有关.患者将从更多的疾病教育中受益,良好的社交网络对患者健康和福祉的重要性应该得到加强。需要更多的研究来更好地了解NASH的患者负担。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with increased mortality and a high clinical burden. NASH adversely impacts patients\' health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but published data on the humanistic burden of disease are limited. This review aimed to summarise and critically evaluate studies reporting HRQoL or patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in populations with NASH and identify key gaps for further research.
    UNASSIGNED: Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO were searched for English-language publications published from 2010 to 2021 that reported HRQoL/PRO outcomes of a population or subpopulation with NASH.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-five publications covering 23 unique studies were identified. Overall, the data showed a substantial impact of NASH on HRQoL, particularly in terms of physical functioning and fatigue, with deterioration of physical and mental health as NASH progresses. Prevalent symptoms, including fatigue, abdominal pain, anxiety/depression, cognition problems, and poor sleep quality, adversely impact patients\' ability to work and perform activities of daily living and the quality of relationships. However, some patients fail to attribute symptoms to their disease because of a lack of patient awareness and education. NASH is associated with high rates of comorbidities such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, which contribute to reduced HRQoL. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of diagnostic methods, population, outcomes, follow-up time, and measures of HRQoL/utility. Most studies were rated \'moderate\' at quality assessment, and all evaluable studies had inadequate control of confounders.
    UNASSIGNED: NASH is associated with a significant HRQoL burden that begins early in the disease course and increases with disease progression. More robust studies are needed to better understand the humanistic burden of NASH, with adequate adjustment for confounders that could influence outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has a significant impact on quality of life, with individuals experiencing worse physical and mental health compared with the general population. NASH and its symptoms, which include tiredness, stomach pain, anxiety, depression, poor focus and memory, and impaired sleep, affect individuals\' relationships and ability to work and perform day-to-day tasks. However, not all patients are aware that their symptoms may be related to NASH. Patients would benefit from more education on their disease, and the importance of good social networks for patient health and well-being should be reinforced. More studies are needed to better understand the patient burden of NASH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国有近1700万癌症幸存者,包括那些目前正在接受治愈性癌症治疗并有望成为长期幸存者的人,以及患有慢性癌症的人,如转移性疾病或慢性淋巴细胞白血病,他们将接受癌症治疗多年。当前的临床实践指南侧重于生活方式干预,比如锻炼和健康的饮食习惯,但通常不涉及临床医生的管理策略或提高药物依从性的策略.我们讨论了癌症幸存者中的3种心脏代谢合并症,并在癌症诊断之前介绍了合并症的患病率。在癌症治疗期间治疗合并症,以及长期癌症幸存者或接受慢性癌症治疗的患者合并症的管理考虑。讨论了支持药物依从性的方法以及增强团队方法的潜在方法,以优化整个疾病连续过程中癌症患者的护理。
    There are nearly 17 million cancer survivors in the United States, including those who are currently receiving cancer therapy with curative intent and expected to be long-term survivors, as well as those with chronic cancers such as metastatic disease or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, who will receive cancer therapy for many years. Current clinical practice guidelines focus on lifestyle interventions, such as exercise and healthy eating habits, but generally do not address management strategies for clinicians or strategies to increase adherence to medications. We discuss 3 cardiometabolic comorbidities among cancer survivors and present the prevalence of comorbidities prior to a cancer diagnosis, treatment of comorbidities during cancer therapy, and management considerations of comorbidities in long-term cancer survivors or those on chronic cancer therapy. Approaches to support medication adherence and potential methods to enhance a team approach to optimize care of the individual with cancer across the continuum of disease are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏康复(CR)被认可可以改善癌症幸存者的心血管预后。尚未评估基于CR的肿瘤学研究的质量。
    本研究的目的是评估基于CR的肿瘤学干预研究的报告质量和证据,并探讨干预参与与结果之间的关联。
    对5个数据库进行了系统搜索(2020年1月)并进行了更新(2021年9月)。评估成人癌症幸存者治疗期间和治疗后基于CR的干预措施的随机和非随机研究均符合条件。独立审阅者使用2条报告准则(干预描述和复制模板以及报告试验的合并标准危害扩展)提取数据,偏倚风险(ROB)评估工具(非随机干预研究中的CochraneROB2.0和Cochrane偏倚风险),和组合清单(用于评估学习质量和报告的工具)。使用荟萃分析来探索通常评估结果的干预前/干预后差异。
    包括来自685名幸存者的10项研究。干预报告(干预描述和复制模板)和危害(报告试验危害扩展的综合标准)的平均质量分数分别为62%和17%,分别。在非随机(非随机干预研究中的Cochrane偏倚风险评分:25%)和随机(ROB2.0评分:50%)研究中,ROB为中高。平均标准化心肺适应度较高(0.42;95%CI:0.27-0.57),疲劳较低(-0.45;95%CI:-0.55至-0.34),与未完成CR的幸存者相比,完成CR的幸存者的体脂百分比(0.07;95%CI:-0.23至0.38)没有差异。
    基于CR的肿瘤学研究具有低到中等的报告质量和中到高的ROB限制性解释,再现性,并将这些证据转化为实践。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is endorsed to improve cardiovascular outcomes in cancer survivors. The quality of CR-based research in oncology has not been assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of reporting and evidence from CR-based intervention studies in oncology and to explore associations between intervention participation and outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic searches of 5 databases were conducted (January 2020) and updated (September 2021). Randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating CR-based interventions in adult cancer survivors during and after treatment were eligible. Independent reviewers extracted data using 2 reporting guidelines (Template for Intervention Description and Replication and Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials Harms extension), risk of bias (ROB) assessment tools (Cochrane ROB 2.0 and Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions), and a combined inventory (Tool for the Assessment of Study Quality and reporting in Exercise). A meta-analysis was used to explore pre-intervention/post-intervention differences for commonly assessed outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten studies involving data from 685 survivors were included. The mean quality scores for intervention reporting (Template for Intervention Description and Replication) and harms (Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials Harms extension) were 62% and 17%, respectively. There was moderate-to-high ROB across nonrandomized (Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions score: 25%) and randomized (ROB 2.0 score: 50%) studies. The mean standardized cardiorespiratory fitness was higher (0.42; 95% CI: 0.27-0.57), fatigue was lower (-0.45; 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.34), and percent body fat (0.07; 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.38) was not different in survivors completing CR compared with those not completing CR.
    UNASSIGNED: CR-based studies in oncology have low-to-moderate reporting quality and moderate-to-high ROB limiting interpretation, reproducibility, and translation of this evidence into practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阐明异位矿化介质作为动脉钙化生物标志物的作用。
    搜索MEDLINE和Embase的相关文献,直到2022年1月4日。研究的生物标志物是:钙,磷酸盐,甲状旁腺激素,维生素D,焦磷酸盐,骨保护素,核因子-κB受体活化因子配体(RANKL),成纤维细胞生长因子-23(FGF-23),Klotho,骨桥蛋白,骨钙蛋白,基质Gla蛋白(MGP)及其非活性形式和维生素K。排除仅在肾功能不全或糖尿病患者中进行的研究。
    在筛选了8985篇文章后,本系统综述共纳入129篇文章.对于本综述中包含的所有生物标志物,结果是可变的,超过一半的研究中每种特定生物标志物的结果均不显著.此外,纳入研究的总体质量较低,部分原因是主要是横断面研究设计。最大的证据是磷酸盐,骨桥蛋白和FGF-23,一半以上的研究表明,正关联。无法得出这些生物标志物的确切陈述,由于研究数量有限,并受到残留混杂因素的阻碍,或者结果不显著.其他异位矿化介质与动脉钙化的关联尚不清楚。
    异位矿化和动脉钙化的生物标志物之间的关联在已发表的文献中是可变的。未来区分内侧和内膜钙化的纵向研究可以增加对生物标志物和动脉钙化机制的认识。
    UNASSIGNED: To clarify the role of mediators of ectopic mineralization as biomarkers for arterial calcifications.
    UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for relevant literature, until January 4th 2022. The investigated biomarkers were: calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, pyrophosphate, osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), Klotho, osteopontin, osteocalcin, Matrix Gla protein (MGP) and its inactive forms and vitamin K. Studies solely performed in patients with kidney insufficiency or diabetes mellitus were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: After screening of 8985 articles, a total of 129 articles were included in this systematic review. For all biomarkers included in this review, the results were variable and more than half of the studies for each specific biomarker had a non-significant result. Also, the overall quality of the included studies was low, partly as a result of the mostly cross-sectional study designs. The largest body of evidence is available for phosphate, osteopontin and FGF-23, as a little over half of the studies showed a significant, positive association. Firm statements for these biomarkers cannot be drawn, as the number of studies was limited and hampered by residual confounding or had non-significant results. The associations of the other mediators of ectopic mineralization with arterial calcifications were not clear.
    UNASSIGNED: Associations between biomarkers of ectopic mineralization and arterial calcification are variable in the published literature. Future longitudinal studies differentiating medial and intimal calcification could add to the knowledge of biomarkers and mechanisms of arterial calcifications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19对世卫组织东南亚区域11个国家的卫生系统产生了深远的影响。我们对使用定量和比较方法的研究进行了系统回顾,以评估大流行对四种非传染性疾病(NCDs)服务提供的影响(癌症,心血管疾病,慢性呼吸系统疾病,和糖尿病)在该地区。
    在PubMed中进行了系统搜索,Embase,MedRxiv,和世卫组织COVID-19数据库于2021年12月发布。使用JoannaBriggs研究所关键评估清单和ROBINS-I偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。按照“无荟萃分析的综合”报告指南进行叙述性综合。
    两位综述作者独立筛选了5397条记录,包括31项研究,26个是横断面研究。大多数研究(n=24,77%)在印度进行,19(61%)是单中心研究。与大流行前相比,10/17癌症研究发现,门诊服务减少了>40%,9/14心血管疾病在住院患者中减少了30%或更多,2项研究发现呼吸系统疾病的诊断和干预措施减少了78.9%和83.0%,分别。没有发现关于COVID-19对糖尿病服务影响的合格研究。
    COVID-19严重扰乱了世卫组织东南亚区域非传染性疾病基本卫生服务的提供,特别是癌症和心血管疾病。这可能会对该区域非传染性疾病患者的健康和死亡率产生严重和潜在的长期影响。
    这项工作得到了世卫组织斯里兰卡国家办事处的支持。
    UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 has had a profound impact on the health systems of the 11 countries of the WHO South East Asia Region. We conducted a systematic review of studies that used quantitative and comparative approaches to assess the impact of the pandemic on the service provision of four noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) (cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes) in the region.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, MedRxiv, and WHO COVID-19 databases in December 2021. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and the ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted following the \'synthesis without meta-analysis\' reporting guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: Two review authors independently screened 5,397 records with 31 studies included, 26 which were cross-sectional studies. Most studies (n=24, 77%) were conducted in India and 19 (61%) were single-site studies. Compared to a pre-pandemic period, 10/17 cancer studies found a >40% reduction in outpatient services, 9/14 cardiovascular disease found a reduction of 30% or greater in inpatient admissions and 2 studies found diagnoses and interventions for respiratory diseases reduced up to 78.9% and 83.0%, respectively. No eligible studies on the impact of COVID-19 on diabetes services were found.
    UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 has substantially disrupted the provision of essential health services for NCDs in the WHO South East Asia Region, particularly cancer and cardiovascular disease. This is likely to have serious and potentially long-term downstream impacts on health and mortality of those living with or at risk of NCDs in the region.
    UNASSIGNED: This work was supported by the WHO Sri Lanka Country Office.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从时间的迷雾中可以知道胆道疾病和心脏病之间存在着密切的联系。急性非结石性胆囊炎(AAC)可以定义为在没有胆石症的情况下胆囊的急性坏死性炎性疾病。AAC是一个具有挑战性的诊断。与症状的缺乏和相似性以及模仿心血管疾病(CVD)的实验室数据相关的非典型临床发作通常会导致漏诊和误诊。此外,与结石性胆囊炎相比,AAC通常具有暴发性病程,并且通常与坏疽有关。穿孔和脓胸以及相当高的发病率和死亡率(上升50%)。早期诊断对于及时治疗至关重要,以避免并发症并提高生存能力。即使在今天,尽管两百年的科学证据表明,AAC和CVD之间有着密切的联系,由于缺乏RCT,关于AAC和CVD的关系以及因此的临床管理仍然存在很多困惑。此外,急诊医生并不总是熟悉AAC的瞬时心电图变化。这篇综述的目的是提供关于流行病学的证据,病理生理学,AAC和CVD之间复杂关联的临床表现和治疗。我们的主要发现表明,在每种一般疾病导致心血管疾病或脑血管疾病或大型心脏或主动脉手术等灌注不足后,应怀疑AAC。在缺乏IMA(急性心肌梗死)的重要实验室数据的情况下,ECG变化可能与误诊的AAC有关。超声检查在AAC的早期诊断和随访中起着关键作用。胆囊造口术和胆囊切除术是唯一或连续的,代表了AAC的两种主要治疗选择。
    The existence of a close association between disease of the biliary tract and disease of the heart is known from the mists of time. Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) can be defined as an acute necro inflammatory disease of the gallbladder in the absence of cholelithiasis. AAC is a challenging diagnosis. The atypical clinical onset associated to a paucity and similarity of symptoms and to laboratory data mimicking cardiovascular disease (CVD) often results in under and misdiagnosed cases. Moreover, AAC has commonly a fulminant course compared to calculous cholecystitis and it is often associated with gangrene, perforation and empyema as well as considerable morbidity and mortality (up 50%). Early diagnosis is crucial to a prompt treatment in order to avoid complications and to increase survivability. Even today, although scientific evidence dating two hundred years has shown a close association between AAC and CVD, due to the lack of RCT, there is still a lot of confusion regarding the relationship and consequently the clinical management AAC and CVD. In addition, emergency physicians are not always familiar with transient ECG changes with AAC. The aim of this review was to provide evidence regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment of the complex association between AAC and CVD. Our main findings indicate that AAC should be suspected after each general disease leading to hypoperfusion such as cardiovascular diseases or cerebrovascular diseases or major heart or aortic surgery. ECG changes in absence of significant laboratory data for IMA (Acute myocardial infarction) could be related to a misdiagnosed AAC. US - Ultrasonography-plays a key role in the early diagnosis and also in the follow up of AAC. Cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy as unique or sequential represent the two prevailing treatment options for AAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)是全球孕产妇发病和死亡的主要原因。不幸的是,这些疾病的发展缺乏准确的早期临床筛查方法。动脉僵硬度(AS)是血管健康的重要血液动力学指标,已显示出预测HDP发作的有希望的结果。该领域过去的系统评价报告了发生HDP的妇女AS指数的增加,并强调了AS测量作为妊娠早期预测工具的潜力。最近的系统审查,包括截至2015年的论文,评估了有和没有妊娠并发症的女性之间AS参数的差异。从那以后,关于该主题的已发表研究大量涌入,并且对将AS测量纳入临床实践的兴趣日益浓厚。因此,我们提出了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,该综述和荟萃分析更涵盖所有HDP亚群和血管健康的各种血液动力学指标,以全面概述目前的证据状况.具体来说,我们的目标是评估与正常血压妊娠相比发生HDPs的女性的这些指标,以确定哪些指标与HDPs的发生最相关和/或可以预测HDPs的发生.主要数据库(Medline,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,PubMed,和CINAHL),将搜索灰色文献(GoogleScholar)和临床试验(clinicaltrials.gov),以确定报告有和没有HDP的孕妇AS和血液动力学测量的研究。对研究类型或年份没有限制。文章将由三位作者独立评估,以根据纳入和排除标准确定资格。将评估纳入研究的方法学质量。将使用随机效应模型进行汇集分析。还将评估发表偏倚和研究之间的异质性。异质性的来源将通过敏感性来探索,子组,和/或荟萃回归分析。这项研究的结果将通过科学会议和科学期刊上的出版物分享。对HDP发病的潜在AS和血流动力学标志物的分析将有助于制定筛查指南和临床相关的AS和HDP风险的血流动力学标志物的临界值。指导未来的研究。编写本协议没有适用的道德考虑。
    Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Unfortunately, accurate early clinical screening methods for the development of these disorders are lacking. Arterial stiffness (AS) is an important hemodynamic indicator of vascular health that has shown promising results for the prediction of HDP onset. Past systematic reviews in the field have reported an increase in AS indices in women who develop HDPs and have highlighted the potential of AS measurements as a predictive tool early in pregnancy. The most recent systematic review, including papers up to 2015, assessed the differences in AS parameters between women with and without pregnancy complications. Since then, there has been a substantial influx of published research on the topic and a growing interest in the incorporation of AS measurements into clinical practice. Thus, we propose a systematic review and meta-analysis that is more inclusive to all HDP subsets and various hemodynamic indices of vascular health to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of evidence. Specifically, we aim to evaluate these measures in women who develop HDPs compared to normotensive pregnancies to determine which measures are most associated with and/or can predict the development of HDPs. Major databases (Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and CINAHL), grey literature (Google Scholar) and clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov) will be searched to identify studies that report AS and hemodynamic measurements in pregnant women with and without HDPs. No restrictions will be made on study type or year. Articles will be independently evaluated by three authors to determine eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of included studies will be assessed. Pooled analyses will be conducted using a random-effects model. Publication bias and between-study heterogeneity will also be assessed. Sources of heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity, subgroup, and/or meta-regression analyses. Results from this study will be shared through scientific conferences and publications in scientific journals. The analysis of potential AS and hemodynamic markers for HDP onset will help inform the development of screening guidelines and clinically relevant cut-off values of AS and hemodynamic markers for HDP risk, guiding future research. There are no applicable ethical considerations to the writing of this protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号