A whole series of processes lead to the decrease in the use of traditional medicine by the indigenous peoples of Mexico, including the reduction in the number of traditional healers and the direct and indirect expansion of biomedicine. This essay addresses the central role these processes play in the relations of hegemony/subalternity that occur in different fields of reality, and especially in the health-illness-care-prevention processes, given that counter-hegemonic processes are not generated, or those that do arise have been ineffective in confronting social hegemony in general and biomedical hegemony in particular.
Toda una serie de procesos conducen a la disminución del uso de la medicina tradicional por los pueblos indígenas de México, incluyendo la reducción del número de curadores tradicionales y la expansión directa e indirecta de la biomedicina. En este ensayo se aborda el papel nuclear que tienen estos procesos en las relaciones de hegemonía/subaltenidad que se dan en los diferentes campos de la realidad y, especialmente, en los procesos de salud-enfermedad-atención-prevención, dado que no se generan procesos contrahegemónicos o, los que surgen, han sido ineficaces para enfrentar la hegemonía social en general y biomédica en particular.

Blockchain is topical in many areas of science. The impact on clinical care of physicians is not known. We undertook a rapid review of the literature to identify areas of interest for clinicians in active practice focusing on evidence relevant to clinical care. We found limited evidence for use blockchain in clinical practice with most studies focusing on technical aspects of prototypes and implementation with no evidence of standardised metric to measure impact for patients, clinicians, and organisations. Personal Health Records for use across organisational and geographic boundaries emerged as the strongest clinical use-case. Defined metrics by professional bodies might aid research, development, and future impact.

UNASSIGNED: To explore the influence of case-based learning (CBL) teaching methods in comparison to the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model in clinical teaching of nephrology for master\'s degree students in clinical medicine.
UNASSIGNED: Clinical medicine master\'s degree students who were trained in the Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2015 to December 2021 were selected as the study objects. The selected students were divided into two groups: the LBL group comprised 16 graduate students who received the traditional LBL model from December 2015 to December 2018, and the CBL group comprised 18 graduate students who received the CBL teaching methods from January 2019 to December 2021. Both groups participated in the professional theoretical knowledge assessment, including objective and subjective questions and calculating the total score), and the examination of clinical skills communication ability, preparation of handling materials, anesthesia techniques, operational skills, aseptic techniques, and postoperative management), at the time of discharge from the department. The independent learning ability (self-management ability, information ability, and learning ability) of students of the two groups after teaching was then assessed, and the satisfaction of the two groups with their respective teaching mode (including satisfaction with the teaching format, teaching effectiveness, interest stimulation, independent learning and the improvement of teamwork ability) was assessed by the questionnaire on the degree of satisfaction of the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: The assessment scores of professional theoretical knowledge in the CBL group were significantly higher than those in the LBL group in objective questions, subjective questions, and total scores (P1 = .028; P2 = .036; P3 = .041). The CBL group scored higher than the LBL group in the assessment of communication skills, preparation of operative items, anesthesia technique, operative skills, aseptic technique, and postoperative handling skills, but the differences were not statistically significant (P1 = .071; P2 = .260; P3 = .184; P4 = .127; P5 = .352; P6 = .584). The self-management ability, information ability, and learning ability scores of students in the CBL group were significantly higher than those in the LBL group (P1 = .006; P2 = .013; P3 = .003). Students in the CBL group were significantly higher than those in the LBL group in terms of satisfaction with teaching form, teaching effect, interest stimulation, improvement of independent learning ability, and satisfaction with teamwork ability (P1 = .015; P2 = .008; P3 = .010; P4 = .024; P5 = .022).
UNASSIGNED: The CBL teaching model can improve and enhance the clinical thinking ability of clinical medicine master\'s degree students in nephrology, and stimulate their interest in learning. Professional master\'s degree students have a high degree of satisfaction with the CBL model.

Polymyxin B and colistin are considered the last therapeutic option to treat infections caused by highly drug-resistant bacteria. However, their administration may lead to various adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and allergic reactions. The current case report presents the clinical manifestation of polymyxin B-associated neurotoxicity in a female patient with no chronic illness history. The patient was rescued from under rubble during an earthquake. She was diagnosed with an intra-abdominal infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) After the initiation of the polymyxin B infusion, the patient developed numbness and tingling sensations in her hands, face, and head. On discontinuing polymyxin B and starting colistimethate, the patient\'s symptoms improved. Therefore, healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential risk factors associated with neurotoxicity in patients receiving polymyxin B. On identifying such symptoms treatment should be discontinued promptly to prevent further neurological damage.

OBJECTIVE: The product information and literature does not provide confirmation of compatibility for co-administration of all commonly used drug pairs in obstetrics. However, there is a need for co-administration of these drugs over one lumen for this group of patients. Therefore, this study focuses on Y-site compatibility. Since different conditions between clinical and laboratory settings can lead to discrepancies in results, a novel approach for drug intravenous compatibility testing was designed to reflect clinical conditions. The aim was to study the compatibility of nine commonly used drug pairs in obstetrics and to evaluate the clinical value of the designed method.
METHODS: The clinical situation was reflected by using different temperature ranges (20°C and 37°C), actual Y-site flow ratios, clinically relevant drug pairs and an observation time of 120 min. The clinically relevant drugs pairs include atosiban, nicardipine, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, oxytocin, remifentanil, labetalol and magnesium sulpfate. Drug pairs were visually assessed according to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) and pH was measured. When incompatibility of a drug pair seemed likely based on literature review or observed abnormalities during visual assessment, subvisual analysis was performed using a particle counter. Y-site compatibility applied for drug pairs when no visual changes occurred or when no additional particles were formed during the observation time.
RESULTS: Eight of the nine combinations showed no visual changes or noticeable changes in pH during the observation time. The amoxicillin/clavulanic-acid-oxytocin combination showed a colour change at 37°C at the actual Y-site flow ratio. However, subvisual particle counting showed no formation of additional particles.
CONCLUSIONS: Y-site compatibility was established for all tested drug pairs. The new clinical approach for analysing Y-site compatibility provides a high certainty of outcomes for clinical practice. In this way, clinical complications and use of several additional intravenous catheters can be avoided.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

The most common documented allergy is due to penicillin use, and penicillin allergy is often diagnosed early in childhood. However, fewer than 1% of the approximately 10% of the population with reported penicillin allergy have a true allergy. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes have employed pharmacist-led protocols to rechallenge patients with a documented history of penicillin allergy. There are published data to suggest that patients with a history of penicillin allergy can be successfully rechallenged and desensitised. We report a case of a 74-year-old woman with a documented childhood history of penicillin allergy who was rechallenged with amoxicillin/clavulanate (Augmentin) in the hospital during admission. She was given one trial dose of amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of urinary tract infection to cover organisms detected in the urine culture. Amoxicillin/clavulanate was determined to be the most suitable antibiotic for empirical treatment. Given a documented history of penicillin allergy from over 60 years ago, the likelihood of reactivity was suspected to be low to none. The patient, however, developed an allergic reaction after the one-time oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg dose trial.

Dl-3-n-butylphthalide (DL-NBP) has good neuroprotective function and is safe for use in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. DL-NBP induced anaphylactic shock is rarely reported. Here we describe the case of a 75-year-old woman who received an injection of DL-NBP (25 mg/100 mL intravenously guttae, twice daily) for acute ischaemic stroke. Approximately 5 min after the DL-NBP injection was administered, the patient developed a decrease in blood pressure and an increase in heart rate along with skin pruritus, mottlement of the lower limbs, discomfort, and the desire to defecate, following which DL-NBP was discontinued immediately. The patient recovered with antiallergic therapy and could tolerate further treatment. We emphasise that the increased use of DL-NBP in recent year raises the importance of attention to potential allergies in clinical use, especially in patients with a history of allergies to multiple drugs.

The purpose of this study is to report a patient who developed acute reactive thrombocytopenia while undergoing treatment with sulperazon for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Sulperazon is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that can act against a wide range of microorganisms, but rarely causes severe thrombocytopenic events. We describe a 62-year-old man with new-onset acute reactive thrombocytopenia who experienced a precipitous fall in the platelet count from 168×109/L to 1×109/L within 29 hours after exposure to sulperazon. Sulperazon was immediately discontinued followed by administration of intravenous immunoglobulin for six consecutive days. The platelet count eventually recovered and petechiae at the injection sites improved. No complications secondary to acute reactive thrombocytopenia were observed except petechiae.