CA-19-9 Antigen

CA - 19 - 9 抗原
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:迄今为止,糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)和癌胚抗原(CEA)已被广泛用于筛查,胆道癌(BTC)患者的诊断和预测。然而,在BTC患者中报道了大量碳水化合物抗原50(CA50)的研究。
    方法:本研究纳入2017年1月至2022年12月安徽省肝胆外科联盟肝癌Clin-Bio数据库的1121例患者(训练队列673例,验证队列448例):458与BTC,178例肝细胞癌(HCC),23合并肝细胞-胆管癌,462例非肿瘤患者。应用接收人工作特点(ROC)曲线和判定曲线剖析(DCA)评价诊断效能和临床有用性。
    结果:结合CA50,CA19-9和AFP获得的ROC曲线显示诊断模型1的AUC值为0.885(95%CI0.856-0.885,特异性70.3%,和敏感性84.0%)在训练队列中和0.879(0.841-0.917,76.7%,和84.3%)在验证队列中。此外,比较iCCA和HCC(训练队列中的235,157在验证队列中),诊断模型2的AUC值为0.893(95%CI0.853-0.933,特异性96%,和敏感性68.6%)在训练队列中和0.872(95%CI0.818-0.927,94.2%,和64.6%)在验证队列中。
    结论:结合CA50、CA19-9和AFP的模型不仅对BTC具有良好的诊断价值,而且对区分iCCA和HCC也具有良好的诊断价值。
    BACKGROUND: To date, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have been widely used for the screening, diagnosis and prediction of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. However, few studies with large sample sizes of carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50) were reported in BTC patients.
    METHODS: A total of 1121 patients from the Liver Cancer Clin-Bio Databank of Anhui Hepatobiliary Surgery Union between January 2017 and December 2022 were included in this study (673 in the training cohort and 448 in the validation cohort): among them, 458 with BTC, 178 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 23 with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and 462 with nontumor patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and clinical usefulness.
    RESULTS: ROC curves obtained by combining CA50, CA19-9, and AFP showed that the AUC value of the diagnostic MODEL 1 was 0.885 (95% CI 0.856-0.885, specificity 70.3%, and sensitivity 84.0%) in the training cohort and 0.879 (0.841-0.917, 76.7%, and 84.3%) in the validation cohort. In addition, comparing iCCA and HCC (235 in the training cohort, 157 in the validation cohort), the AUC values of the diagnostic MODEL 2 were 0.893 (95% CI 0.853-0.933, specificity 96%, and sensitivity 68.6%) in the training cohort and 0.872 (95% CI 0.818-0.927, 94.2%, and 64.6%) in the validation cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: The model combining CA50, CA19-9, and AFP not only has good diagnostic value for BTC but also has good diagnostic value for distinguishing iCCA and HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目的是使用间接方法为中国西南地区明显健康的老年人群建立和验证血清肿瘤标志物的参考间隔(RI)。
    方法:收集2020年4月至2021年12月华西医院35名60岁及以上健康老年人群的数据。我们利用Box-Cox转换与Tukey方法相结合来归一化数据并消除异常值。根据性别和年龄划分亚组以检查RI的划分。Z检验用于比较组间差异,95%分布RI是使用非参数方法计算的。
    结果:在研究中,我们观察到男性血清铁蛋白和Des-γ-羧基凝血酶原(DCP)的RI更广泛,范围从64.18到865.80ng/ml和14.00到33.00mAU/ml,分别,与女性相比,其范围为52.58至585.88ng/ml和13.00至29.00mAU/ml。对于其他生物标志物,总体RI如下:甲胎蛋白(AFP)0-6.75ng/ml,癌胚抗原(CEA)0-4.85ng/ml,女性碳水化合物抗原15-3(CA15-3)0-22.00U/ml,碳水化合物抗原19-9(CA19-9)0-28.10U/ml,碳水化合物抗原125(CA125)0-20.96U/ml,细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)0-4.66U/ml,神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)0-19.41ng/ml,男性的总和游离前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA和fPSA)为0-5.26ng/ml和0-1.09ng/ml。所有这些生物标志物的RI已经通过我们严格的过程进行了验证。
    结论:本研究初步确定了中国西南地区明显健康的老年人群95%的RIs。使用真实世界的数据和间接方法,可以建立和验证老年人口的简单可靠的RI,适用于各种临床实验室。
    BACKGROUND: The aim is to establish and verify reference intervals (RIs) for serum tumor markers for an apparently healthy elderly population in Southwestern China using an indirect method.
    METHODS: Data from 35,635 apparently healthy elderly individuals aged 60 years and above were obtained in West China Hospital from April 2020 to December 2021. We utilized the Box-Cox conversion combined with the Tukey method to normalize the data and eliminate outliers. Subgroups are divided according to gender and age to examine the division of RIs. The Z-test was used to compare differences between groups, and 95% distribution RIs were calculated using a nonparametric method.
    RESULTS: In the study, we observed that the RIs for serum ferritin and Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) were wider for men, ranging from 64.18 to 865.80 ng/ml and 14.00 to 33.00 mAU/ml, respectively, compared to women, whose ranges were 52.58 to 585.88 ng/ml and 13.00 to 29.00 mAU/ml. For other biomarkers, the overall RIs were established as follows: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 0-6.75 ng/ml, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) 0-4.85 ng/ml, carbohydrate antigen15-3 (CA15-3) for females 0-22.00 U/ml, carbohydrate antigen19-9 (CA19-9) 0-28.10 U/ml, carbohydrate antigen125 (CA125) 0-20.96 U/ml, cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) 0-4.66 U/ml, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) 0-19.41 ng/ml, total and free prostate-specific antigens (tPSA and fPSA) for males 0-5.26 ng/ml and 0-1.09 ng/ml. The RIs for all these biomarkers have been validated through our rigorous processes.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study preliminarily established 95% RIs for an apparently healthy elderly population in Southwestern China. Using real-world data and an indirect method, simple and reliable RIs for an elderly population can be both established and verified, which are suitable for application in various clinical laboratories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已知分子的遗传多态性会导致抗癌药物治疗效果的个体差异。然而,到目前为止,抗癌药物的种系突变(但不是体细胞突变)尚未得到充分研究。这项研究的目的是研究吉西他滨代谢和转运蛋白基因的种系多态性与碳水化合物抗原19-9(CA19-9)反应(在8周时比治疗水平降低≥50%)和总生存期(OS)之间的关系接受吉西他滨为基础的化疗的转移性胰腺癌患者。
    方法:这个多中心,prospective,观察性研究纳入接受吉西他滨单药治疗或吉西他滨联合纳米粒白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合化疗的转移性胰腺癌患者.对可能与吉西他滨反应性有关的13种多态性进行了基因分型,单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定这些基因型与CA19-9应答和OS的关联。显著性水平设定为5%。
    结果:总计,来自日本11家医院的180名患者进行了登记,最终分析中纳入了可评估CA19-9应答的159例患者.具有CA19-9反应的患者的OS明显更长(372与241天;p=.007)。RRM12464A>G和RRM2175T>G多态性提示与CA19-9应答和OS弱相关,但没有统计学意义。COX-2-765G>C多态性与CA19-9反应没有显着相关,但与OS显着相关(风险比,2.031;p=.019)。
    结论:来自吉西他滨药代动力学的遗传多态性表明与疗效没有显着关联,但参与肿瘤细胞增殖的COX-2多态性可能影响OS。
    BACKGROUND: Genetic polymorphisms of molecules are known to cause individual differences in the therapeutic efficacy of anticancer drugs. However, to date, germline mutations (but not somatic mutations) for anticancer drugs have not been adequately studied. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between germline polymorphisms of gemcitabine metabolic and transporter genes with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) response (decrease ≥50% from the pretreatment level at 8 weeks) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.
    METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who were receiving gemcitabine monotherapy or gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Thirteen polymorphisms that may be involved in gemcitabine responsiveness were genotyped, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association of these genotypes with CA 19-9 response and OS. The significance level was set at 5%.
    RESULTS: In total, 180 patients from 11 hospitals in Japan were registered, and 159 patients whose CA 19-9 response could be assessed were included in the final analysis. Patients who had a CA 19-9 response had significantly longer OS (372 vs. 241 days; p = .007). RRM1 2464A>G and RRM2 175T>G polymorphisms suggested a weak association with CA 19-9 response and OS, but it was not statistically significant. COX-2 -765G>C polymorphism did not significantly correlate with CA 19-9 response but was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio, 2.031; p = .019).
    CONCLUSIONS: Genetic polymorphisms from the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine did not indicate a significant association with efficacy, but COX-2 polymorphisms involved in tumor cell proliferation might affect OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已知碳水化合物抗原19-9(CA19-9)的预后价值受胆囊癌(GBC)患者胆红素水平升高的影响。治愈性切除后GBC患者CA19-9水平与总胆红素(TB)水平之比变化的临床意义尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是确定这些患者术前和术后CA19-9/TB比率变化的预后价值。
    方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了在2015年1月至2020年12月期间接受GBC根治性切除术的连续患者的数据,这些数据存储在来自10家医院的多中心数据库中。根据调整后的CA19-9定义为CA19-9与TB的比率,并使用2×103U/µmol作为上限值,将患者分为正常组(术前和术后校正CA19-9正常),正常组(术前异常,但术后正常调整CA19-9),和非正常化组(术后调整后的CA19-9异常)。主要结果是总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。使用对数秩检验比较各组之间的OS和RFS。Cox回归模型用于确定与OS和RFS独立相关的因素。
    结果:正常组(n=179例)和正常组(n=73例)的OS和RFS均优于非正常组(n=65例)(3年OS率72.0%,58.4%和24.2%,RFS率分别为54.5%,25.5%和11.8%,分别;两者P<0.001)。在OS和RFS(OS,P=0.255;RFS,P=0.130)。Cox回归分析证实,非正常组与OS和RFS较差独立相关。亚组分析显示,与未接受辅助治疗的患者相比,接受辅助治疗的非正常化组的OS和RFS显着改善(OS,P=0.025;RFS,P=0.003)。
    结论:接受根治性手术切除的GBC患者术后调整后CA19-9水平异常(CA19-9/TB比值)与较差的长期生存结果相关。手术后的辅助治疗改善了这些患者的长期预后。
    BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is known to be affected by elevated bilirubin levels in patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). The clinical significance of changes in the ratio of CA19-9 levels to total bilirubin (TB) levels in patients with GBC after curative-intent resection remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of changes in preoperative and postoperative CA19-9/TB ratio in these patients.
    METHODS: Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GBC between January 2015 and December 2020 stored in a multicenter database from 10 hospitals were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Based on the adjusted CA19-9 defined as the ratio of CA19-9 to TB, and using 2×10 3  U/µmol as the upper normal value, patients were divided into a normal group (with normal preoperative and postoperative adjusted CA19-9), a normalization group (with abnormal preoperative but normal postoperative adjusted CA19-9), and a non-normalization group (with abnormal postoperative adjusted CA19-9). The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The log-rank test was used to compare OS and RFS among the groups. The Cox regression model was used to determine factors independently associated with OS and RFS.
    RESULTS: The normal group ( n =179 patients) and the normalization group ( n =73 patients) had better OS and RFS than the non-normalization group ( n =65 patients) (the 3-year OS rates 72.0%, 58.4% and 24.2%, respectively; the RFS rates 54.5%, 25.5% and 11.8%, respectively; both P <0.001). There were no significant differences between the normal and the normalization groups in OS and RFS (OS, P =0.255; RFS, P =0.130). Cox regression analysis confirmed that the non-normalization group was independently associated with worse OS and RFS. Subgroup analysis revealed that the non-normalization group of patients who received adjuvant therapy had significantly improved OS and RFS as compared to those who did not receive adjuvant therapy (OS, P =0.025; RFS, P =0.003).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent surgical resection with postoperative abnormal levels of adjusted CA19-9 (the CA19-9/TB ratio) were associated with poorer long-term survival outcomes. Adjuvant therapy after surgery improved the long-term outcomes of these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们研究了新辅助治疗(NAT)在可切除胰腺癌中的真正指征,以及在临界可切除胰腺癌中的最佳手术时机。
    方法:共纳入687例可切除或临界可切除的胰腺癌患者。通过意向治疗分析进行生存分析,并进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。
    结果:在可切除的疾病中,NAT组的总生存期(OS)优于前期组.多因素分析确定CA19-9水平(≥100U/mL)和淋巴结转移是预后因素。25mm的肿瘤大小是预测淋巴结转移的最佳临界值。肿瘤大小≤25mm且CA19-9<100U/mL的患者与NAT组之间的生存差异无统计学意义。在边缘可切除的疾病中,NAT组中的OS显著优于上行组。CEA(≥5ng/mL)和CA19-9(≥100U/mL)被确定为预后因素;然而,满足这些因素的患者的OS比NAT组差.
    结论:对于肿瘤大小≤25mm和CA19-9<100U/mL的可切除疾病患者,NAT可能是不必要的。在边缘可切除的疾病中,应推迟手术,直至肿瘤标志物水平得到良好控制.
    OBJECTIVE: We investigated true indication of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in resectable pancreatic cancer and the optimal surgical timing in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
    METHODS: A total of 687 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Survival analysis was performed by intention-to-treat analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted.
    RESULTS: In resectable disease, the NAT group showed better overall survival (OS) compared with the upfront group. Multivariate analysis identified CA19-9 level (≥100 U/mL) and lymph node metastasis to be prognostic factors, and a tumor size of 25 mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict lymph node metastasis. There was no significant survival difference between patients with a tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL and those in the NAT group. In borderline resectable disease, OS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the upfront group. CEA (≥5 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) were identified as prognostic factors; however, the OS of patients fulfilling these factors was worse than that of the NAT group.
    CONCLUSIONS: NAT could be unnecessary in patients with tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL in resectable disease. In borderline resectable disease, surgery should be delayed until tumor marker levels are well controlled.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数肿瘤标志物(TMs)的协调状态未知。我们报告了一项可行性研究,以确定是否可以使用外部质量评估(EQA)程序来了解肿瘤标志物α-甲胎蛋白(AFP)的当前协调状态,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA),癌胚抗原(CEA),癌抗原(CA)125、CA15-3和CA19-9。
    方法:由6个EQA提供商提供的EQA样本结果(INSTAND[Germany],韩国外部质量评估服务协会[KEQAS,韩国],国家临床实验室中心[NCCL,中国],英国国家外部质量评估服务[英国NEQAS,英国],将KwaliteitswakingMedische实验室诊断[SKML,荷兰],和澳大利亚皇家病理学家学院质量保证计划[RCPAQAP,澳大利亚])在2020年至2021年之间使用。共识意味着,根据所有EQA程序中存在的测量程序计算(AbbottAlinity,BeckmanCoulterDxI,罗氏·科巴斯,和西门子Atellica),用作参考值。根据测量程序,计算每个EQA样本的一致平均值与所有基于患者池的EQA样本的平均值之间的相对差异,并与最小值进行比较,可取的,和基于生物变异的最佳允许偏差标准。
    结果:最终分析包括在19040(CA15-3)和25398(PSA)之间的个体结果和56(PSA)至76(AFP)独特的EQA样品。所有测量程序的基于患者池的EQA样本与共识平均值的平均差异均在AFP的最佳偏倚标准内,PSA的理想偏差,和CEA的最小偏差准则。然而,CEA结果<8µg/L超过了最小偏差标准。对于CA125、CA15-3和CA19-9,协调状态超出了最小偏差标准,确定了系统差异。
    结论:本研究提供了6种肿瘤标志物目前协调状态的相关信息。CEA的试点协调调查,CA125、CA15-3和CA19-9将是理想的。
    The harmonization status of most tumor markers (TMs) is unknown. We report a feasibility study performed to determine whether external quality assessment (EQA) programs can be used to obtain insights into the current harmonization status of the tumor markers α-fetoprotein (AFP), prostate specific antigen (PSA), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA)125, CA15-3 and CA19-9.
    EQA sample results provided by 6 EQA providers (INSTAND [Germany], Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service [KEQAS, South Korea], National Center for Clinical Laboratories [NCCL, China], United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service [UK NEQAS, United Kingdom], Stichting Kwaliteitsbewaking Medische Laboratoriumdiagnostiek [SKML, the Netherlands], and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs [RCPAQAP, Australia]) between 2020 and 2021 were used. The consensus means, calculated from the measurement procedures present in all EQA programs (Abbott Alinity, Beckman Coulter DxI, Roche Cobas, and Siemens Atellica), was used as reference values. Per measurement procedure, the relative difference between consensus mean for each EQA sample and the mean of all patient-pool-based EQA samples were calculated and compared to minimum, desirable, and optimal allowable bias criteria based on biological variation.
    Between 19040 (CA15-3) and 25398 (PSA) individual results and 56 (PSA) to 76 (AFP) unique EQA samples were included in the final analysis. The mean differences with the consensus mean of patient-pool-based EQA samples for all measurement procedures were within the optimum bias criterion for AFP, the desirable bias for PSA, and the minimum bias criterion for CEA. However, CEA results <8 µg/L exceeded the minimum bias criterion. For CA125, CA15-3, and CA19-9, the harmonization status was outside the minimum bias criterion, with systematic differences identified.
    This study provides relevant information about the current harmonization status of 6 tumor markers. A pilot harmonization investigation for CEA, CA125, CA15-3, and CA19-9 would be desirable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们以前表明nab-紫杉醇加S-1(NPS)方案对转移性胰腺导管腺癌(mPDAC)有很好的疗效,然而,其疗效无法通过常规生物标志物准确预测。这项前瞻性研究旨在研究循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)中突变的价值及其动态变化,以预测mPDAC对NPS化疗的反应。
    方法:前瞻性收集接受一线NPS化疗的mPDAC患者的配对肿瘤组织和血液样本,并对425个ctDNA基因进行了下一代测序。高突变等位基因频率(MAF)定义为肿瘤组织和血液中≥30%和≥5%,分别。Kappa统计用于评估肿瘤中突变基因与ctDNA之间的一致性。ctDNA突变及其动态变化与肿瘤反应的关系,总生存期(OS),和无进展生存期(PFS)使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行评估,多变量调整Cox比例风险回归,和纵向数据分析。
    结果:对来自43例mPDAC患者的147份血液样本和43份配对肿瘤样本进行测序。具有高MAF的最常见驱动基因是KRAS(肿瘤,35%;ctDNA,37%)和TP53(肿瘤,37%;ctDNA,33%)。肝转移患者ctDNA中KRAS和TP53的突变率明显高于肝转移患者,基线CA19-9≥2000U/mL,和/或没有早期CA19-9反应。肿瘤和ctDNA之间的5个最常见突变基因的κ值范围为0.48至0.76。在随后的测量中,基因的MAFs大多依次下降,这与客观反应显著相关,增加表明癌症进展。KRAS和ARID1A在肿瘤和ctDNA中的高突变,TP53、CDKN2A、ctDNA中的SMAD4而不是肿瘤中的SMAD4与较短的生存期显着相关。在预测6个月的操作系统时,ctDNA中5种最常见突变基因的AUC范围为0.59至0.84,大于肿瘤中的基因(0.56至0.71)和临床病理特征(0.51至0.68)。重复测量ctDNA中的突变显著区分存活和肿瘤反应。在31例ctDNA检测≥2的患者中,对MAF基因变化的纵向分析表明,48%和42%的患者的ctDNA进展比放射学和CA19-9进展提前60天和58天,分别。
    结论:ctDNA中多个驱动基因的高突变及其动态变化可有效预测mPDAC对NPS化疗的反应。具有良好的可靠预测性能,优于常规临床病理参数。鼓舞人心,纵向ctDNA追踪可以比放射学或CA19-9评估提前约2个月预测疾病进展,具有精确设计mPDAC个性化治疗策略的潜力。
    We previously showed that the nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (NPS) regimen had promising effects against metastatic pancreatic ducal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), whose efficacy however could not be precisely predicted by routine biomarkers. This prospective study aimed to investigate the values of mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and their dynamic changes in predicting response of mPDAC to NPS chemotherapy.
    Paired tumor tissue and blood samples were prospectively collected from patients with mPDAC receiving first-line NPS chemotherapy, and underwent next-generation sequencing with genomic profiling of 425 genes for ctDNA. High mutation allelic frequency (MAF) was defined as ≥ 30% and ≥ 5% in tumor tissue and blood, respectively. Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement between mutant genes in tumor and ctDNA. Associations of mutations in ctDNA and their dynamic changes with tumor response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, and longitudinal data analysis.
    147 blood samples and 43 paired tumor specimens from 43 patients with mPDAC were sequenced. The most common driver genes with high MAF were KRAS (tumor, 35%; ctDNA, 37%) and TP53 (tumor, 37%; ctDNA, 33%). Mutation rates of KRAS and TP53 in ctDNA were significantly higher in patients with liver metastasis, with baseline CA19-9 ≥ 2000 U/mL, and/or without an early CA19-9 response. κ values for the 5 most commonly mutated genes between tumor and ctDNA ranged from 0.48 to 0.76. MAFs of the genes mostly decreased sequentially during subsequent measurements, which significantly correlated with objective response, with an increase indicating cancer progression. High mutations of KRAS and ARID1A in both tumor and ctDNA, and of TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in ctDNA but not in tumor were significantly associated with shorter survival. When predicting 6-month OS, AUCs for the 5 most commonly mutated genes in ctDNA ranged from 0.59 to 0.84, larger than for genes in tumor (0.56 to 0.71) and for clinicopathologic characteristics (0.51 to 0.68). Repeated measurements of mutations in ctDNA significantly differentiated survival and tumor response. Among the 31 patients with ≥ 2 ctDNA tests, longitudinal analysis of changes in gene MAF showed that ctDNA progression was 60 and 58 days ahead of radiologic and CA19-9 progression for 48% and 42% of the patients, respectively.
    High mutations of multiple driving genes in ctDNA and their dynamic changes could effectively predict response of mPDAC to NPS chemotherapy, with promising reliable predictive performance superior to routine clinicopathologic parameters. Inspiringly, longitudinal ctDNA tracking could predict disease progression about 2 months ahead of radiologic or CA19-9 evaluations, with the potential to precisely devise individualized therapeutic strategies for mPDAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:新辅助治疗(NAT)对可切除的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的适用性已经出现,然而,缺乏高水平的证据。本研究旨在探索高风险可切除PDAC的患者亚组,以选择可能受益于NAT的候选人。
    方法:回顾性分析了2007年至2021年间接受手术的1,132例可切除或临界可切除的PDAC患者。无主要血管接触的可切除PDAC患者(R-无接触)(n=651),门静脉或肠系膜上静脉接触(PV/SMV)≤180°(R接触)(n=306),分析无动脉受累的临界可切除PDAC(BR-V)(n=175)。
    结果:平均年龄为64.3±9.8岁,647例(57.2%)为男性。整个队列的中位随访时间为26个月。无血管接触的可切除PDAC患者的总生存期(OS)改善最大(中位数;31.5个月)。在整个可切除的PDAC队列中,NAT和前期手术之间的OS没有显着差异。然而,在R-contact组中,与前期手术相比,NAT显示操作系统显著改善(33vs.23个月)。在接受NAT的患者中,新辅助FOLFIRINOX的OS优于基于吉西他滨的方案(34vs.24个月)。在CA19-9水平≥150U/mL的患者中,NAT与更好的生存率相关,仅当肿瘤在可切除的疾病中有PV/SMV接触时(40vs.19个月,P=0.001)。
    结论:NAT可以被认为是可切除的PDAC患者的有效治疗方法,特别是当肿瘤接触PV/SMV和CA19-9≥150U/mL时。
    BACKGROUND: The applicability of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has arisen, however, high-level evidence is lacking. This study aimed to explore patient subgroups with high-risk resectable PDAC for selecting candidates who may benefit from NAT.
    METHODS: The 1132 patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with resectable PDAC without contact of major vessels (R-no contact) ( n =651), with contact of portal vein or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) ≤180° (R-contact) ( n =306), and borderline resectable PDAC without arterial involvement (BR-V) ( n =175) were analyzed.
    RESULTS: The mean age was 64.3±9.8 years, and 647 patients (57.2%) were male. The median follow-up was 26 months in the entire cohort. Patients with resectable PDAC without vascular contact had the most improved overall survival (OS) (median; 31.5 months). OS did not significantly differ between NAT and upfront surgery in the entire resectable PDAC cohort. However, in R-contact group, NAT showed significantly improved OS compared to upfront surgery (33 vs. 23 months). Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was showed a better OS than gemcitabine-based regimens in patients who underwent NAT (34 vs. 24 months). NAT was associated with a better survival in the patients with CA 19-9 level ≥150 U/ml, only when the tumor has PV/SMV contact in resectable disease (40 vs. 19 months, P =0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: NAT can be considered as an effective treatment in patients with resectable PDAC, particularly when the tumor is in contact with PV/SMV and CA 19-9 ≥150 U/ml.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺癌切除术后CA19-9升高提示复发,但在良性疾病中也可能发生。本研究旨在探讨胰腺癌术后CA19-9升高对肿瘤复发的解释。纳入了在我们医院接受胰腺癌胰腺切除术的患者队列。其中,52例患者术后CA19-9升高,无放射学证据复发。这些患者通过随访CA19-9测量进行评估。CA19-9增加率是根据第一次升高和后续测量计算的。评估CA19-9增加率与肿瘤复发之间的关联。与没有这种增加的患者相比,CA19-9增加率≥30%的患者在3个月内的复发频率明显更高(p=0.0002)。多因素分析显示CA19-9升高率≥30%是复发的独立危险因素(比值比8.17,p=0.0309)。首次升高(p=0.1794)和随访测量(p=0.1121)时的CA19-9值与复发无关。术后第一次CA19-9升高后,基于随访测量的CA19-9升高率可作为肿瘤复发的预测因素.
    Postoperative CA19-9 elevation after pancreatic cancer resection suggests recurrence but can also occur in benign conditions. This study aimed to investigate the interpretation of postoperative CA19-9 elevation after pancreatic cancer surgery in terms of cancer recurrence. A cohort of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer at our hospital was included. Among them, 52 patients exhibited postoperative CA19-9 elevation without radiological evidence of recurrence. These patients were evaluated with follow-up CA19-9 measurements. The CA19-9 increase rates were calculated based on the first elevation and the follow-up measurement. The association between the CA19-9 increase rate and tumor recurrence was assessed. Patients with a CA19-9 increase rate of ≥ 30% had a significantly higher frequency of recurrence within 3 months compared to those without such an increase (p = 0.0002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a CA19-9 increase rate of ≥ 30% was an independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio 8.17, p = 0.0309). The CA19-9 value at the first elevation (p = 0.1794) and at the follow-up measurement (p = 0.1121) were not associated with recurrence. After the first postoperative CA19-9 elevation, the CA19-9 increase rate based on follow-up measurements can serve as a predictive factor for tumor recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了早期结直肠癌(CRC)患者术前高碳水化合物抗原19-9(CA19-9)水平的临床意义。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2004年至2022年在我们机构接受原发性CRC根治性切除术(c-I-III期)患者的临床病理资料。根据术前CA19-9水平将患者分为三组:正常(≤37.0U/ml),高(>37.0至≤100.0U/ml),和非常高(>100.0U/ml)。
    结果:在971名患者中,885(91.1%),67(6.9%),19人(2.0%)正常,高,和非常高的CA19-9水平,分别。总生存率(非常高与正常:p<0.0001,非常高高:p=0.01)和无复发生存率(非常高与正常:p<0.0001,非常高高:p=0.18)在极高组中明显更差。在包括TNM阶段在内的多变量分析中,术前非常高的CA19-9水平与整体较差(比值比=4.54;95%置信区间=2.03-10.16;p=0.0002)和无复发生存率(比值比=3.49;95%置信区间=1.82-6.69;p=0.0002)独立相关.
    结论:术前高CA19-9水平与早期CRC的低生存率相关。术中仔细观察和密切随访可能是必要的。
    OBJECTIVE: This study examined the clinical significance of very high preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC).
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of patients who underwent curative resection for primary CRC (c-Stage I-III) between 2004 and 2022 in our facility. The patients were classified into three groups according to the preoperative CA19-9 level: normal (≤37.0 U/ml), high (>37.0 to ≤100.0 U/ml), and very high (>100.0 U/ml).
    RESULTS: Of 971 patients, 885 (91.1%), 67 (6.9%), and 19 (2.0%) had normal, high, and very high CA19-9 levels, respectively. Overall survival (very high vs. normal: p<0.0001, very high vs. high: p=0.01) and recurrence-free survival (very high vs. normal: p<0.0001, very high vs. high: p=0.18) were significantly worse in the very high group. On multivariate analysis including TNM stage, very high preoperative CA19-9 levels were independently associated with worse overall (odds ratio=4.54; 95% confidence interval=2.03-10.16; p=0.0002) and recurrence-free survival (odds ratio=3.49; 95% confidence interval=1.82-6.69; p=0.0002).
    CONCLUSIONS: High preoperative CA19-9 levels were associated with poor survival in early-stage CRC. Careful intraoperative observation and close follow-up might be necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号