The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of zoledronic acid (ZA) on postoperative healing and functional rehabilitation in osteoporotic patients with rotator cuff (RC) injury. 96 Patients were divided into three groups according to bone mineral density and ZA use (Group A: normal BMD; Group B: osteoporosis and intravenous ZA use; Group C: osteoporosis, without ZA use). Radiologic, functional and Serological outcomes were evaluated 6 months after surgery. The functional scores in all groups exhibited significant improvement 6 months after surgery. Inter-group comparison showed that Constant Shoulder joint function Score (CSS) of group A not significantly differing from that of group B, the other indicators were significantly better than those of group B and C. There were no significant differences in shoulder forward flexion, abductive Range of Motion between group B and C. Other indicators of group B were significantly improved compared to group C. The retear rate in group C (30.3%, 10/33) was higher than group A (6.1%, 2/33) and group B (13.3%, 4/30). In conclusion, the application of ZA can significantly reduce the rate of RC retear in elderly patients with osteoporosis after surgery, which is significant for postoperative shoulder joint functional rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Acute-phase reactions (APRs) are common among people treated for the first time with zoledronate (ZOL). The current view is that both the APRs caused by ZOL and its efficacy are related to the mevalonic acid pathway. However, the relationship between APRs and ZOL efficacy remains unclear.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Shanghai, China, for 1 year. A total of 108 patients with an average age of 67.4 ± 5.8 years were treated with 5 mg intravenous ZOL for the first time. Data on demographic characteristics, APRs, blood counts, bone turnover markers, including C-telopeptide collagen crosslinks (CTX) and N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (PINP), and bone mineral density (BMD) were collected.
RESULTS: (1) The results did not reveal a relationship between APRs and changes in bone turnover markers and BMD but showed that changes in body temperature (T) within 3 days after administration were positively correlated with changes in the BMD of the LS at Month 12 (β = 0.279 P = 0.034). (2) This effect was mediated mainly by changes in serum CTX (b = 0.046, 95% CI [0.0010-0.0091]). (3) The ROC curve revealed that when T increased by 1.95 °C, the sensitivity and specificity of identifying clinically important changes in LS BMD after 1 year were optimized.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we tested the hypothesis that people with elevated body T after initial ZOL treatment had greater improvements in BMD and better outcomes.
BACKGROUND: NCT, NCT03158246. Registered 18/05/2017.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing hemodialysis are at an elevated risk of fractures; however, substantial evidence for osteoporosis treatment in this population is lacking. We explored the efficacy of denosumab, an anti-IgG2 antibody that targets the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand, in reducing fracture incidence and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study-conducted from December 2013 to December 2022-evaluated the effects of denosumab on fracture incidence and all-cause mortality. Patients who initiated denosumab treatment during the study period were defined as the denosumab group, while those without a history of denosumab administration were defined as the non-denosumab group. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to assess survival and fracture/mortality risks, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze both fractures and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Among 214 patients undergoing hemodialysis, 52 (24.3%) received denosumab. The median age was 73.0 ± 11.5 years, with 92 (43.0%) females, and the median dialysis duration was 59 months (interquartile range, 6-126). During the study, thirty-seven non-denosumab-treated patients had fractures compared to eight in the denosumab group. No significant differences were observed in the unadjusted model (HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.24-1.14). Adjusting for competing mortality and clinical factors, the HR remained at 0.64 (95% CI, 0.27-1.51). Regarding all-cause mortality, we found a statistically significant difference in the unadjusted model (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.98]). A significant reduction in mortality was observed in the adjusted model (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26-0.80]). Notably, the denosumab group showed a significant decrease in mortality, particularly in cardiovascular disease-related cases (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.14-0.78]).
CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab may reduce all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis, particularly in those with cardiovascular complications. This finding offers a promising direction for osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

This was a Phase I, randomized, double-blinded, three-arm, single-dose, parallel study aimed to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between MB09 (a denosumab biosimilar candidate) and reference denosumab (XGEVA® from European Union [EU-reference] and United States [US-reference]) in a healthy male population. The primary PK endpoints included: Area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration timepoint (AUC0-last); and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints included: AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), time to reach maximum observed concentration, clearance, terminal phase half-life, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. A total of 255 subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a subcutaneous 35 mg dose of MB09 or reference denosumab. Cmax was reached after denosumab administration, followed by a decline in the concentration with similar terminal phase half-live across treatment arms. Systemic exposure of MB09 (AUC0-last and Cmax) was equivalent to the reference denosumab, as the 90% confidence intervals around the geometric least square mean ratios laid within the predefined acceptance limits (80.00%, 125.00%) across all comparisons. Pharmacodynamic parameters, based on the percent of change from baseline in serum C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 collagen levels, were similar across the three arms. The treatments were considered safe and generally well tolerated, with 92 treatment-emergent adverse events reported (most Grade 2 and 3) and similarly distributed. Immunogenicity was low and similarly distributed. These results provide strong evidence that supports the biosimilarity between MB09 and denosumab reference products.

BACKGROUND: Novel strategies are needed to address the rising burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. High-intensity resistance and impact (HiRIT) exercise has shown benefit in improving bone density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Whether HiRIT can enhance the therapeutic effects of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy has not been established. ROLEX-DUO is a randomised controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of romosozumab on various bone and muscle outcomes in combination with different exercise interventions in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis/osteopenia.
METHODS: ROLEX-DUO is an 8-month randomised placebo-controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centres for patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. The study is implementing the combination of romosozumab or placebo with different forms of exercise in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia without recent fragility fracture (n=102). Eligible women will be randomised 1:1:1 into one of three groups: (1) romosozumab with supervised HiRIT, (2) romosozumab with unsupervised low-intensity exercise or (3) placebo with unsupervised low-intensity exercise. Co-primary outcomes are the mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), and mean change in five times sit-to-stand test performance (seconds) at 8 months. Secondary/exploratory outcomes include BMD changes at the femoral neck, total hip and distal radius, three-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip outcomes, DXA-derived lean and fat mass, serum markers of bone turnover (procollagen type 1 peptide, C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen) and bone biomarkers (dickkopf-1), serum extracellular vesicle analyses, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) quality-of-life scores, Menopause-Specific Quality Of Life (MENQOL) Questionnaire menopause symptom burden scores, number of falls and fractures. Mixed-effects models will be performed to compare longitudinal outcome results between groups using intention-to-treat analysis.
BACKGROUND: The trial was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH01794, protocol V.8, dated 03 July 2024). Participants will provide written informed consent prior to inclusion. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and summary reports to funding bodies.
BACKGROUND: ACTRN12623000867695.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive neoplasm with a high propensity for recurrence following intralesional curettage. The introduction of denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor, has shown potential in facilitating joint-sparing surgery. However, concerns exist regarding its impact on local recurrence rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined preoperative denosumab with adjuvant microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of high-risk GCTB.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 19 patients with high-risk GCTB who underwent preoperative denosumab treatment followed by curettage and adjuvant MWA. The primary outcome measure was the local recurrence rate, with secondary outcomes including functional status assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and safety profile of the treatment.
RESULTS: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the outcomes of 19 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with preoperative denosumab and adjuvant MWA. The median follow-up duration was 33.1 months, 3 patients (15.8%) experienced local recurrence at a median of 21.6 months postoperatively and the local recurrence-free survival was 81.2% at two years. Notably, no patient developed lung metastasis, and all recurrences were successfully managed with repeat curettage and MWA, with a mean MSTS score of 27.3. No patient required joint replacement due to tumor recurrence, resulting in a 100% joint preservation rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of preoperative denosumab and adjuvant MWA is a feasible and effective strategy for the management of high-risk GCTB, providing effective local control with preserved joint function. This approach may offer a surgical alternative for young patients where joint preservation is paramount.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is one of the most common symptoms of osteoporosis. The pain can seriously affect patients\' mood and quality of life; it can also further aggravate bone loss, causing a serious social burden. Minodronate is an oral bisphosphonate that needs to be administered daily. It significantly reduces levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs) and rapidly improves symptoms of low back pain in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis requires long-term treatment, and daily dosing reduces patient compliance. Minodronate has a better safety profile than other bisphosphonates. The objective of the trial is to explore the efficacy and safety of minodronate in the treatment of low back pain in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.
METHODS: This is a single-centre, randomized, open-label controlled trial with a 24-week duration. Seventy-two eligible patients will be randomly divided into 4 groups. Subjects will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either minodronate (1 mg/day) or alendronate (10 mg/day) every day; senior women (≥ 75 years old) and older women (< 75 years old) will be at a ratio of 1:2. The primary outcome is the time required for the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to decline by ≥ 10 from baseline. The secondary outcome is the changes in VAS scores from baseline, the frequency and dosage of rescue medication, BTMs, bone mineral density (BMD), and variations in upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptom scores from baseline (including heartburn, pain, and bloating).
CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide objective evidence for the efficiency and safety of minodronate. Furthermore, it will be helpful to evaluate the quantitative relationship between BTMs and BMD in patients with osteoporosis under different ages.
BACKGROUND: This study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05645289 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT05645289 ) on December 8, 2022. The registry name is Peking University Third Hospital. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (M2022465, 2022.08.09, V2.0). The results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.
METHODS: The protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05645289). Recruitment has started in January 2023 and is still ongoing.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the eighth most common cancer in women, with poor survival outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that nitrogen-based bisphosphonate (NBB) use may be associated with reduced risk of EOC, particularly the endometrioid and serous histotypes; however, confounding by indication is a concern. An alternative approach to investigate the chemo-preventive potential of NBBs is to emulate a target trial by identifying all women who initiate use of NBBs and investigate the risk of EOC for continued users compared with discontinued users.
METHODS: Using population-based linked data, we identified all Australian women aged over 50 years who first used NBBs over 2004-12. We used the year after first use to define treatment for each woman as either continued or discontinued use. We emulated randomization using stabilized inverse probability weights to balance the treatment groups using covariates including age, comorbidities and socioeconomic status. We followed women from treatment assignment until EOC diagnosis, death or 31 December 2013. We assessed the risk of EOC (overall and by histotype) using flexible parametric time-to-event models allowing for time-varying effects, and produced time-varying coefficients.
RESULTS: Of the 313 383 women in the study, 472 were diagnosed with EOC during follow-up (261 serous EOC), with an average age at diagnosis of 72 years. Continued use of NBBs was associated with reduced risk of EOC overall (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), and serous EOC (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96), compared with discontinued treatment, with estimates remaining constant over the 9-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from our emulated trial suggest that in women who initiated NBB treatment, those who continued use had 13% and 29% lower hazards of being diagnosed with EOC overall and serous EOC, respectively, compared with women who discontinued use.

BACKGROUND: It is well-known that oral surgical procedures pose a high risk for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients taking bisphosphonates. Although some position papers and guidelines have been published with regard to its treatment, few studies have investigated prevention methods. This study investigates the effectiveness of methenolone enanthate, an anabolic steroid, for the prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.
METHODS: Thirty-six Wistar rats were divided into three groups. Two experimental groups, Z and ZM, took zoledronic acid for 6 weeks prior to extraction of the left maxillary first molar. The Group ZM also was given methenolone enanthate continuously for 1 week before and 4 weeks after the extraction. The control group was not given any medication. The rats were euthanized 5 weeks after extraction. The extraction socket was evaluated clinically for bone exposure and histologically for inflammation, hyperemia, collagen fibers, epithelialization, number of osteoclasts, and empty lacunae.
RESULTS: Six rats died during the experimental research. The bone exposure rate, mean numbers of attached osteoclasts (in 40× magnification), and empty lacunae (in 100× magnification) were 0%, 4%, and 0.8% in Group C; 75%, 1%, and 8% in Group Z; and 10%, 2.1%, and 3% in Group ZM, respectively. Significant differences exist between all groups regarding the number of empty lacunae. There were significant differences between Group C/ZM and Group Z in terms of bone exposure rate, inflammation, hyperemia, collagen fiber organization, and epithelialization.
CONCLUSIONS: In our tested preclinical model, methenolone enanthate has shown potential for preventing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association of bisphosphonates with outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip osteoarthritis (OA) over 4 years.
METHODS: This study examined data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), which included 4088 hips from 2057 participants. Bisphosphonate users were identified as those who reported usage at least three times, including at baseline and during the subsequent 1, 2, 3, and 4-year follow-up visits. Non-users were participants who did not use bisphosphonates in the 5 years preceding the baseline and at subsequent follow-up visits. Generalized estimating equations were performed to assess the association between bisphosphonate use and outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip OA over a 4-year follow-up.
RESULTS: The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between bisphosphonate users and non-users concerning outcomes related to radiographic changes and pain in hip OA over 4 years. Specifically, the odds ratios for the incidence and transition of radiographic hip OA were 0.55 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.26 to 1.17) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.47 to 1.28), respectively. Furthermore, the odds ratios for the development and resolution of frequent hip pain were 1.04 (95% CI: 0.76 to 1.42) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.36), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this longitudinal study do not suggest an association between bisphosphonate use and the prevention, slowing, or delay of development and transition of radiographic changes or pain in hip OA over a 4-year follow-up.