Blood glucose self-monitoring

血糖自我监测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着智能手机时代的到来,通过应用程序在家中管理血糖对于患有糖尿病的老年人来说将变得更加普遍。成年子女在老年父母的血糖管理中起着重要作用。很少有研究探讨成年儿童如何通过移动应用程序参与2型糖尿病(T2DM)的老年父母的血糖管理。这项研究提供了通过移动应用程序参与血糖管理的T2DM父母的成年子女的角色认知和经验的见解。
    方法:在这项定性研究中,16名年龄较大的父母患有T2DM的成年子女,使用移动应用程序管理血糖6个月,是通过目的性抽样招募的。半结构化,深入,进行了面对面的访谈,以探讨他们在远程管理年长父母血糖方面的角色认知和经验。遵循定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ)以确保研究的严密性。采用Colaizzi七步定性分析法对收集的数据进行分析。
    结果:本研究确定了六个主题和八个子主题。通过移动应用程序,成年儿童在T2DM老年父母的血糖管理中的感知角色可以分为四个主题:健康决策者,远程主管,健康教育者和情感支持者。参与的经验可以分为两个主题:参与的促进者和参与的障碍。
    结论:对于年龄较大的T2DM父母的成年子女通过移动应用程序参与血糖管理存在一些障碍;然而,这项研究的结果总体上是积极的。成年子女共同管理老年父母的血糖是有益且可行的。在患有T2DM的老年父母中共同管理血糖水平可以提高依从性和有效管理血糖的信心。
    BACKGROUND: With the advent of the smart phone era, managing blood glucose at home through apps will become more common for older individuals with diabetes. Adult children play important roles in glucose management of older parents. Few studies have explored how adult children really feel about engaging in the glucose management of their older parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through mobile apps. This study provides insights into the role perceptions and experiences of adult children of older parents with T2DM participating in glucose management through mobile apps.
    METHODS: In this qualitative study, 16 adult children of older parents with T2DM, who had used mobile apps to manage blood glucose for 6 months, were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face interviews to explore their role perceptions and experiences in remotely managing their older parents\' blood glucose were conducted. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) were followed to ensure rigor in the study. The data collected were analyzed by applying Colaizzi\'s seven-step qualitative analysis method.
    RESULTS: Six themes and eight sub-themes were identified in this study. Adult children\'s perceived roles in glucose management of older parents with T2DM through mobile apps could be categorized into four themes: health decision-maker, remote supervisor, health educator and emotional supporter. The experiences of participation could be categorized into two themes: facilitators to participation and barriers to participation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Some barriers existed for adult children of older parents with T2DM participating in glucose management through mobile apps; however, the findings of this study were generally positive. It was beneficial and feasible for adult children to co-manage the blood glucose of older parents. Co-managing blood glucose levels in older parents with T2DM can enhance both adherence rates and confidence in managing blood glucose effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥胖是糖尿病的主要危险因素。达到健康的减肥,特别是减少体内脂肪,在管理前驱糖尿病和防止进展为完全糖尿病及其合并症方面很重要。这项研究检查了个性化营养治疗(PNT)结合连续血糖监测(CGM)对糖尿病前期患者体重和组成的影响。共有30名超重或肥胖的糖尿病前期患者被随机分配到治疗方案中,观察到的CGM数据加上PNT,或在整个研究过程中不知道血糖结果的对照组。两组都提供了关于卡路里摄入量和大量营养素分布的饮食建议,再加上个性化的血糖控制和健康饮食目标设定,没有任何特别强调减轻体重或改变体力活动。每10天安排一次定期访视以进行测量并替换CGM。使用具有重复测量的通用线性模型分析数据。在30天的随访期内,两组的体重和脂肪量均显著减少.治疗组的体重和脂肪量减少了两倍,碳水化合物摄入量的显著减少,与对照组相比,花费在身体活动上的时间显着增加。此外,治疗组的依从性明显较高.这些发现表明,超重或肥胖的糖尿病前期患者可以通过个性化的血糖控制教育来实现体重减轻和身体成分改善。不完全强调减肥是首要目标。此外,CGM提供的实时反馈增强了这些改进。
    Obesity stands out as a primary risk factor for diabetes. Attaining healthy weight loss, especially reducing body fat, is important in managing prediabetes and preventing progression to full diabetes and its co-morbidities. This study examined the effects of personalized nutrition therapy (PNT) combined with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on body weight and composition in individuals with prediabetes. A total of 30 individuals with prediabetes who were overweight or obese were assigned randomly to either the treatment, observed CGM data plus PNT, or the control group which was blinded to their blood glucose results throughout the study. Both groups were provided with dietary recommendations for calorie intake and macronutrient distribution, coupled with personalized goal setting for glucose control and healthy eating, without any specific emphasis on weight reduction or changes in physical activity. Regular visits were scheduled every 10 days to perform measurements and replace CGMs. Data were analyzed using General Linear Model with repeated measures. Over the 30-day follow-up period, both groups experienced significant reductions in weight and fat mass. The treatment group exhibited two-fold greater reductions in both weight and fat mass, a significant decrease in carbohydrate intake, and a significant increase in time spent on physical activitycompared to the control group. In addition, compliance was notably higher in the treatment group. These findings indicate that overweight or obese individuals with prediabetes can achieve weight loss and improved body composition through personalized education for glucose control, without exclusively emphasizing weight loss as the primary objective. Additionally, the real-time feedback provided by CGM enhances these improvements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在儿科人群中引入闭环系统是糖尿病管理和发展的革命。然而,在喂养的情况下,发表的研究并不多,时间表,儿童的活动偏离了系统编程的常规,就像糖尿病儿童和青少年夏令营一样,其中该设备的具体编程是未知的。这是一项单中心前瞻性初步研究。共有27名患者(平均年龄11.9±1.9岁,40%男性,包括糖尿病的持续时间6.44±2.83年)(20个使用MedtronicMiniMed780G系统,7个使用串联控制IQ)。在7天的训练营和随后的3周内监测血糖变量和泵功能。在任何时刻都没有从目标TIR降低70%。在“低于范围的时间”中,最差的结果是在营地开始后72小时,在超出范围时间中最差的结果是在最初的24小时,在那之后有了进步。没有发生3级低血糖或酮症酸中毒。在两个集成系统中使用特定的编程,在复杂的血糖调节算法和没有准备的情况下,体力活动水平增加或喂养程序突然变化,我们的儿科1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的3级低血糖和酮症酸中毒的风险没有增加,无论闭环设备。
    The introduction of closed-loop systems in the pediatric population has been a revolution in the management and evolution of diabetes. However, there are not many published studies in situations in which the feeding, schedules, and activities of the children deviate from the routine for which the systems were programmed, as in the case of a summer camp for children and adolescents with diabetes, where the specific programming of this device is not well known. It was a single-center prospective preliminary study. A total of twenty-seven patients (mean age 11.9 ± 1.9 years, 40% male, duration of diabetes 6.44 ± 2.83 years) were included (twenty with Medtronic MiniMed 780G system and seven with Tandem Control-IQ). Glucometric variables and pump functionality were monitored during the 7-day camp and in the following 3 weeks. There was no decrease from the objective TIR 70% at any moment. The worst results in Time Below Range were at 72 h from starting the camp, and the worst results in Time Above Range were in the first 24 h, with a progressive improvement after that. No episodes of level 3 hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred. The use of specific programming in two integrated systems, with complex blood glucose regulation algorithms and not-prepared-for situations with increased levels of physical activity or abrupt changes in feeding routines, did not result in an increased risk of level 3 hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis for our pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients, regardless of the closed-loop device.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:糖尿病远程医疗地中海饮食(DiaTeleMed)研究是一项完全远程随机临床试验,旨在评估2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的个性化饮食管理。该研究旨在测试个性化行为方法对中度控制的T2D饮食管理的有效性,与使用一刀切的饮食建议的标准化行为干预相比,与常规护理控制(UCC)相比。主要结果将比较每种干预对血糖波动平均幅度(MAGE)的影响。
    方法:符合条件的参与者年龄在21至80岁之间,诊断为中度控制的T2D(HbA1c:6.0%至8.0%),并根据单独的生活方式或生活方式加二甲双胍进行管理。参与者必须愿意并且能够参加虚拟咨询会议,并将膳食记录到饮食跟踪智能手机应用程序(DayTwo)中,并佩戴连续血糖监测仪(CGM)长达12天。参与者被随机分配(每个手臂n=255,n=85)到三个手臂之一:(1)个性化,(2)标准化,或(3)UCC。测量发生在0(基线),3和6个月。所有参与者都接受等热量能量和大量营养素目标,以满足地中海饮食指南。除了14名6个月以上的干预接触者(每周4次,每10次)外,还包括糖尿病自我管理教育.前4个UCC干预联系人通过同步视频会议传递,然后是教育视频链接。标准化的参与者获得与UCC部门相同的教育内容,遵循相同的时间表。然而,所有干预联系都是通过同步视频会议进行的,与基于社会认知理论(SCT)的行为咨询相结合,再加上使用移动应用程序,提供对卡路里和大量营养素的实时反馈计划膳食的饮食自我监控。个性化手臂的参与者接受标准化干预的所有要素,除了对登录到移动应用程序的膳食和零食的预测餐后血糖反应(PPGR)的实时反馈。
    结论:DiaTeleMed研究旨在通过确定行为咨询和个性化营养建议对T2D患者血糖控制的贡献来解决当前精准营养领域的一个重要差距。该研究的完全远程方法允许在人群水平上的可扩展性和个性化饮食建议的创新交付。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05046886。2021年9月16日注册。
    BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Telemedicine Mediterranean Diet (DiaTeleMed) Study is a fully remote randomized clinical trial evaluating personalized dietary management in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The study aims to test the efficacy of a personalized behavioral approach for dietary management of moderately controlled T2D, versus a standardized behavioral intervention that uses one-size-fits-all dietary recommendations, versus a usual care control (UCC). The primary outcome will compare the impact of each intervention on the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE).
    METHODS: Eligible participants are between 21 and 80 years of age diagnosed with moderately controlled T2D (HbA1c: 6.0 to 8.0%) and managed on lifestyle alone or lifestyle plus metformin. Participants must be willing and able to attend virtual counseling sessions and log meals into a dietary tracking smartphone application (DayTwo), and wear a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for up to 12 days. Participants are randomized with equal allocation (n = 255, n = 85 per arm) to one of three arms: (1) Personalized, (2) Standardized, or (3) UCC. Measurements occur at 0 (baseline), 3, and 6 months. All participants receive isocaloric energy and macronutrient targets to meet Mediterranean diet guidelines, in addition to 14 intervention contacts over 6 months (4 weekly then 10 biweekly) to cover diabetes self-management education. The first 4 UCC intervention contacts are delivered via synchronous videoconferences followed by educational video links. Participants in Standardized receive the same educational content as those in the UCC arm, following the same schedule. However, all intervention contacts are conducted via synchronous videoconferences, paired with Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)-based behavioral counseling, plus dietary self-monitoring of planned meals using a mobile app that provides real-time feedback on calories and macronutrients. Participants in the Personalized arm receive all elements of the Standardized intervention, in addition to real-time feedback on predicted post-prandial glycemic response (PPGR) to meals and snacks logged into the mobile app.
    CONCLUSIONS: The DiaTeleMed Study aims to address an important gap in the current landscape of precision nutrition by determining the contributions of behavioral counseling and personalized nutrition recommendations on glycemic control in individuals with T2D. The fully remote methodology of the study allows for scalability and innovative delivery of personalized dietary recommendations at a population level.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05046886. Registered on September 16, 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:糖尿病是美国第八大死亡原因。结构性种族主义和系统性压迫导致的不平等导致了糖尿病患病率的种族/族裔差异,诊断,和治疗。糖尿病自我管理培训(DSMT)远程血糖监测(RGM),和来自社区卫生工作者(CHW)的量身定制的支持有可能改善结果。本研究将检查这些干预措施在安全网医疗保健环境中的实施情况。
    方法:使用实施科学和种族公平原则,本研究旨在(1)评估适当性;(2)测量保真度;(3)比较改变三种干预措施的组合和顺序的有效性.探索性目标将衡量干预措施依从性和吸收的可持续性。这个混合方法试验采用了一个顺序,多重分配随机试验(SMART)设计,患者焦点小组讨论,和员工面试。符合条件的黑人/拉丁患者将使用从电子病历系统中提取的患者名单进行招募。经过详细的筛选过程,符合条件的患者将被邀请参加面对面的登记预约。将获得知情同意,患者将被随机分配到DSMT或RGM。6个月时,患者将完成两项评估(糖尿病授权和糖尿病相关的痛苦),和HbA1c值将被审查。“响应者”将被认为是HbA1c至少提高了一个百分点的人。“响应者”保留在他们指定的第一个研究小组中。“无应答者”将被随机分配以切换研究臂或与CHW配对。6个月后,参与者将再次完成两次评估,和他们的HbA1c将被审查。十二个患者焦点小组,每条干预路径有两条,将与员工面试一起进行。
    结论:这项研究是第一个,根据我们的知识,旨在填补我们对在安全网医院接受护理的黑人和拉丁患者中支持糖尿病管理的最佳干预措施顺序和组合的知识中的关键空白。通过实现研究目标,我们将为优化公平的糖尿病管理并最终减少生活在投资不足的城市环境中的患者的种族和族裔医疗保健差异建立证据。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT06040463。2023年9月7日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the eighth leading cause of death in the USA. Inequities driven by structural racism and systemic oppression have led to racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment. Diabetes-self management training (DSMT), remote glucose monitoring (RGM), and tailored support from a community health worker (CHW) have the potential to improve outcomes. This study will examine the implementation of these interventions in a safety-net healthcare setting.
    METHODS: Using implementation science and racial equity principles, this study aims to (1) evaluate the appropriateness; (2) measure fidelity; and (3) compare the effectiveness of varying the combination and sequence of three interventions. An exploratory aim will measure sustainability of intervention adherence and uptake. This mixed-methods trial employs a sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design, patient focus group discussions, and staff interviews. Eligible Black/Latine patients will be recruited using patient lists extracted from the electronic medical record system. After a detailed screening process, eligible patients will be invited to attend an in-person enrollment appointment. Informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized to either DSMT or RGM. At 6 months, patients will complete two assessments (diabetes empowerment and diabetes-related distress), and HbA1c values will be reviewed. \"Responders\" will be considered those who have an HbA1c that has improved by at least one percentage point. \"Responders\" remain in their first assigned study arm. \"Nonresponders\" will be randomized to either switch study arms or be paired with a CHW. At 6 months participants will complete two assessments again, and their HbA1c will be reviewed. Twelve patient focus groups, two for each intervention paths, will be conducted along with staff interviews.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first, to our knowledge, that seeks to fill critical gaps in our knowledge of optimal sequence and combinations of interventions to support diabetes management among Black and Latine patients receiving care at a safety-net hospital. By achieving the study aims, we will build the evidence for optimizing equitable diabetes management and ultimately reducing racial and ethnic healthcare disparities for patients living in disinvested urban settings.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06040463. Registered on September 7, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民不成比例地受到2型糖尿病的影响。连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)技术(例如AbbottFreestyleLibre2,先前称为Flash葡萄糖监测)提供实时葡萄糖监测,与血糖自我监测(SMBG)相比,该实时葡萄糖监测是方便且易于使用的。然而,这项技术的使用既不广泛,也不补贴土著和托雷斯海峡岛民患有2型糖尿病。在与土著和托雷斯海峡岛民社区国家网络的现有合作基础上,这项随机对照试验旨在评估CGM与SMBG对(i)血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)的影响,(ii)达到血糖目标,(iii)在原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的健康环境中减少低血糖发作和(iv)具有成本效益的医疗保健。
    方法:这是一个非屏蔽,平行组,双臂,单独随机,对照试验(ACTRN12621000753853)。接受注射治疗且HbA1c≥7.5%(n=350)的2型糖尿病的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民成年人将被随机(1:1)接受CGM或SMBG治疗6个月。主要结果是HbA1c水平从基线到6个月的变化。次要结果包括(I)CGM衍生的指标,(ii)低血糖发作的频率,(iii)与健康相关的生活质量和(iv)与SMBG相比,与CGM相关的每个质量调整生命年的增量成本。临床试验地点包括土著社区控制组织,原住民医疗服务,城市的初级保健中心和三级医院,农村,地区和偏远的澳大利亚。
    结论:该试验将评估CGM与SMBG对澳大利亚土著和托雷斯海峡岛民2型糖尿病患者HbA1c的影响。该试验可能在改善糖尿病管理方面具有长期益处,并为CGM在该人群中的资助提供证据。
    背景:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册ACTRN12621000753853。2021年6月15日注册
    BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are disproportionately impacted by type 2 diabetes. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology (such as Abbott Freestyle Libre 2, previously referred to as Flash Glucose Monitoring) offers real-time glucose monitoring that is convenient and easy to use compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). However, this technology\'s use is neither widespread nor subsidised for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with type 2 diabetes. Building on existing collaborations with a national network of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, this randomised controlled trial aims to assess the effect of CGM compared to SMBG on (i) haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), (ii) achieving blood glucose targets, (iii) reducing hypoglycaemic episodes and (iv) cost-effective healthcare in an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people health setting.
    METHODS: This is a non-masked, parallel-group, two-arm, individually randomised, controlled trial (ACTRN12621000753853). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with type 2 diabetes on injectable therapy and HbA1c ≥ 7.5% (n = 350) will be randomised (1:1) to CGM or SMBG for 6 months. The primary outcome is change in HbA1c level from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes include (i) CGM-derived metrics, (ii) frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes, (iii) health-related quality of life and (iv) incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained associated with the CGM compared to SMBG. Clinical trial sites include Aboriginal Community Controlled Organisations, Aboriginal Medical Services, primary care centres and tertiary hospitals across urban, rural, regional and remote Australia.
    CONCLUSIONS: The trial will assess the effect of CGM compared to SMBG on HbA1c for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with type 2 diabetes in Australia. This trial could have long-term benefits in improving diabetes management and providing evidence for funding of CGM in this population.
    BACKGROUND: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000753853. Registered on 15th June 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用连续血糖监测(CGM)评估接受Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖变异性(GV)。
    方法:这项前瞻性队列研究比较了14例接受RYGB的T2DM患者(n=7)和非T2DM患者(n=7)的CGM数据。六个月后,将这些患者与BMI相匹配的非手术对照组(n=7)进行比较,性别,和年龄为T2DM组。
    结果:14例患者接受了RYGB,平均BMI为46.9±5.3kg/m2,平均年龄为47.9±8.9岁;85%为女性。手术后6个月,总重量损失(TWL)为27.1±6.3%,组间无显著差异。无糖尿病患者的平均间质葡萄糖水平较低(81vs.94和98mg/dl,p<0.01)和较低的血糖管理指标(GMI)(5.2vs.5.6%和5.65%,p=0.01)与对照组和T2DM组相比,分别。仅糖尿病患者的变异系数(CV)显着增加(17%vs.26.7%,p<0.01)。两组都有(0%vs.2%,p=0.03)和无(3%与22%,p=0.03)T2DM在低葡萄糖(54-69mg/dL)下经历低于范围的时间增加。然而,无T2DM患者的发病时间明显减少(70-180mg/dL)(97%vs.78%,p=0.04)。
    结论:RYGB患者中CGM指标的显著差异表明手术后血糖变异性增加,低血糖持续时间较长,特别是在没有T2DM的患者中。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic variability (GV) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
    METHODS: This prospective cohort study compared the CGM data of fourteen patients with T2DM (n = 7) and without T2DM (n = 7) undergoing RYGB. After 6 months, these patients were compared to a non-operative control group (n = 7) matched by BMI, sex, and age to the T2DM group.
    RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent RYGB, with a mean BMI of 46.9 ± 5.3 kg/m2 and an average age of 47.9 ± 8.9 years; 85% were female. After 6 months post-surgery, the total weight loss (TWL) was 27.1 ± 6.3%, with no significant differences between the groups. Patients without diabetes had lower mean interstitial glucose levels (81 vs. 94 and 98 mg/dl, p < 0.01) and lower glucose management indicator (GMI) (5.2 vs. 5.6 and 5.65%, p = 0.01) compared to the control and T2DM groups, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CV) significantly increased only in patients with diabetes (17% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.01). Both groups with (0% vs. 2%, p = 0.03) and without (3% vs. 22%, p = 0.03) T2DM experienced an increased time below range with low glucose (54-69 mg/dL). However, patients without T2DM had significantly less time in rage (70-180 mg/dL) (97% vs. 78%, p = 0.04).
    CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in CGM metrics among RYGB patients suggest an increase in glycemic variability after surgery, with a longer duration of hypoglycemia, especially in patients without T2DM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自我护理实践是全面糖尿病管理的组成部分,这可能会受到各种社会人口的影响,临床,和生活方式因素。
    目的:本研究旨在评估在Yirgalem总医院随访的糖尿病患者的糖尿病自我护理实践水平及其相关因素,Yirgalem,西达玛,埃塞俄比亚。
    方法:2022年2月15日至5月10日进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究,涉及298名在Yirgalem总医院进行随访的糖尿病患者。使用预先测试的面试官问卷来收集患者的数据。进行了描述性分析,以确定良好的自我护理实践水平。进行了双变量和多变量二元物流回归,以确定与良好的糖尿病自我护理实践相关的因素。p值<0.05的关联被认为是统计学上显著的。
    结果:患者糖尿病自我护理总体良好率为59.4%。关于护理的特定领域,15(5%)参与者有良好的自我血糖监测护理,228(76.5%)有良好的运动自我保健,268人(89.9%)有良好的饮食自我保健,228(76.5%)有良好的足部自我保健,260(87.2%)的糖尿病药物依从性良好。单身婚姻状况(AOR=5.7,95%CI:(1.418,22.915),城市住宅(AOR=2.992,95%CI:(1.251,7.153)),和有血糖仪(AOR=2.273,95%CI:(1.083,4.772))是与良好的糖尿病自我护理实践显著相关的因素。
    结论:参与者中良好的糖尿病自我护理实践较低。婚姻状况,居住地,和血糖计是良好的糖尿病自我护理实践的统计学显著预测因素。针对来自农村地区的患者进行有针对性的干预,以提高对自我保健的认识和实践,同时建议在家中使用血糖仪进行自我血糖监测。
    BACKGROUND: Self-care practice is an integral and efficient part of comprehensive diabetes management, which could be influenced by various socio-demographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors.
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the level of diabetes self-care practice and its associated factors among patients with diabetes on follow-up at Yirgalem General Hospital, Yirgalem, Sidama, Ethiopia.
    METHODS: An Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from February 15 to May 10, 2022, involving 298 patients with diabetes on follow-up at Yirgalem General Hospital. A pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire was utilized to collect data from patients. A descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the level of good self-care practice. Bivariate and multivariable binary logistics regression were performed to determine factors associated with good diabetic self-care practice. Associations with a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: The overall good diabetic self-care practice among patients was 59.4%. Regarding the specific domains of care, 15 (5%) participants had good self-glucose monitoring care, 228 (76.5%) had good exercise self-care, 268 (89.9%) had good dietary self-care, 228 (76.5%) had good foot self-care, and 260 (87.2%) had good diabetic medication adherence. Single marital status (AOR = 5.7, 95% CI: (1.418, 22.915), urban residence (AOR = 2.992, 95% CI: (1.251, 7.153)), and having a glucometer (AOR = 2.273, 95% CI: (1.083, 4.772)) were factors that were significantly associated with good diabetic self-care practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: Good diabetic self-care practices among participants was low. Marital status, place of residence, and having a glucometer were statistically significant predictors of good diabetic self-care practices. Targeted intervention addressing those patients from rural areas to increase awareness and practice of self-care, as well as the promotion of having a glucometer at home for self-glucose monitoring is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    囊性纤维化相关性糖尿病(CFRD)与营养状况恶化和肺功能恶化有关。很少探讨新技术在处理CFRD中的作用。该研究的目的是评估高级混合闭环(AHCL)系统对CF患者血糖控制的有效性。
    对使用AHCL系统的CFRD患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值和连续血糖监测(CGM)指标在T0(AHCL放置)收集,T1(1个月),T2(6个月)和T3(1年)评估血糖控制。
    10名患者被纳入研究。数据显示HbA1c值降低(7.31±0.34至6.35±1.00;p=0.03),血糖变异性(p=0.05)和胰岛素需求(p=0.03)。研究人群在1年时达到了美国糖尿病协会(ADA)推荐的血糖目标。还观察到范围内时间(TIR)的增加和高血糖时间的减少。虽然没有统计学意义。
    CFRD患者,使用AHCL可改善HbA1c和血糖变异性方面的血糖控制.TIR的增加和高血糖时间的减少,虽然没有统计学意义,从临床角度来看是非常令人鼓舞的。需要对更大的人群和更长的随访进行进一步的研究。这项研究的结果表明,即使在CF患者中也建议使用AHCL的重要性,在营养状况和呼吸功能方面,谁也可以从血糖改善中受益。
    UNASSIGNED: Cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) is correlated with worsening of nutritional status and greater deterioration of lung function. The role of new technologies for the treatment of CFRD is little explored. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL) systems on glycemic control in CF patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A single-center retrospective study on CFRD patients using AHCL systems was performed. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) metrics were collected at T0 (AHCL placement), T1 (1-month), T2 (6-months) and T3 (1-year) to evaluate glycemic control.
    UNASSIGNED: 10 patients were included in the study. Data showed a reduction of HbA1c value (7.31 ± 0.34 to 6.35 ± 1.00; p=0.03), glycemic variability (p=0.05) and insulin requirement (p=0.03). The study population reached American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended glycemic targets at 1-year. An increase in the Time in Range (TIR) and a reduction in time in hyperglycemia were also observed, although not statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with CFRD, the use of AHCL leads to an improvement in glycemic control in terms of HbA1c and glycemic variability. The increase in TIR and the reduction of time in hyperglycemia, although not statistically significant, are extremely encouraging from a clinical point of view. Further studies with a larger population and a longer follow-up are needed. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of proposing the use of AHCL even in CF patients, who could benefit from glycemic improvement also in terms of nutritional status and respiratory function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号