Blood glucose self-monitoring

血糖自我监测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着智能手机时代的到来,通过应用程序在家中管理血糖对于患有糖尿病的老年人来说将变得更加普遍。成年子女在老年父母的血糖管理中起着重要作用。很少有研究探讨成年儿童如何通过移动应用程序参与2型糖尿病(T2DM)的老年父母的血糖管理。这项研究提供了通过移动应用程序参与血糖管理的T2DM父母的成年子女的角色认知和经验的见解。
    方法:在这项定性研究中,16名年龄较大的父母患有T2DM的成年子女,使用移动应用程序管理血糖6个月,是通过目的性抽样招募的。半结构化,深入,进行了面对面的访谈,以探讨他们在远程管理年长父母血糖方面的角色认知和经验。遵循定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ)以确保研究的严密性。采用Colaizzi七步定性分析法对收集的数据进行分析。
    结果:本研究确定了六个主题和八个子主题。通过移动应用程序,成年儿童在T2DM老年父母的血糖管理中的感知角色可以分为四个主题:健康决策者,远程主管,健康教育者和情感支持者。参与的经验可以分为两个主题:参与的促进者和参与的障碍。
    结论:对于年龄较大的T2DM父母的成年子女通过移动应用程序参与血糖管理存在一些障碍;然而,这项研究的结果总体上是积极的。成年子女共同管理老年父母的血糖是有益且可行的。在患有T2DM的老年父母中共同管理血糖水平可以提高依从性和有效管理血糖的信心。
    BACKGROUND: With the advent of the smart phone era, managing blood glucose at home through apps will become more common for older individuals with diabetes. Adult children play important roles in glucose management of older parents. Few studies have explored how adult children really feel about engaging in the glucose management of their older parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through mobile apps. This study provides insights into the role perceptions and experiences of adult children of older parents with T2DM participating in glucose management through mobile apps.
    METHODS: In this qualitative study, 16 adult children of older parents with T2DM, who had used mobile apps to manage blood glucose for 6 months, were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face interviews to explore their role perceptions and experiences in remotely managing their older parents\' blood glucose were conducted. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) were followed to ensure rigor in the study. The data collected were analyzed by applying Colaizzi\'s seven-step qualitative analysis method.
    RESULTS: Six themes and eight sub-themes were identified in this study. Adult children\'s perceived roles in glucose management of older parents with T2DM through mobile apps could be categorized into four themes: health decision-maker, remote supervisor, health educator and emotional supporter. The experiences of participation could be categorized into two themes: facilitators to participation and barriers to participation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Some barriers existed for adult children of older parents with T2DM participating in glucose management through mobile apps; however, the findings of this study were generally positive. It was beneficial and feasible for adult children to co-manage the blood glucose of older parents. Co-managing blood glucose levels in older parents with T2DM can enhance both adherence rates and confidence in managing blood glucose effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本分析的目的是评估冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之前和期间的血糖控制。
    方法:回顾性调查了使用间歇性扫描连续血糖监测(isCGM)的64例(主要分析)和80例(敏感性分析)1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的数据。从电子病历中收集基线特征。这些数据在三个时期进行了检查,每个时期为三个月:从2019年3月16日至2019年6月16日(大流行前),从2019年12月1日至2020年2月29日(封锁前),从2020年3月16日至2020年6月16日(封锁2020年),代表着COVID-19大流行的开始和第一次奥地利范围内的封锁。
    结果:对于主要分析,64名T1D患者(22名女性,42男),平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为58.5mmol/mol(51.0~69.3mmol/mol),平均糖尿病病程13.5年(5.5~22.0年)的患者被纳入分析.时间范围(TIR[70-180mg/dL])是所有三个研究阶段中测量的最高百分比,但在所有这些情况下,2020年锁定阶段提供了最好的数据。关于低于范围的时间(TBR[<70mg/dL])和高于范围的时间(TAR[>180mg/dL]),2020年的封锁阶段也有最好的价值。关于敏感性分析,80名T1D患者(26名女性,54男性),平均HbA1c为57.5mmol/mol(51.0至69.3mmol/mol),平均糖尿病持续时间为12.5年(5.5至20.7年),包括在内。TIR[70-180mg/dL]也是所有三个研究阶段中最高的测量百分比,随着2020年的封锁阶段,在所有这些情况下也提供了最好的数据。TBR[<70mg/dL]和TAR[>180mg/dL]强调了主要分析中的数据。
    结论:良好的血糖控制,根据分析的所有参数,与以前的时期相比,是在第一次奥地利范围内的封锁期间实现的,这可能是减少日常劳累或花费更多时间专注于血糖管理的结果。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to assess glycemic control before and during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.
    METHODS: Data from 64 (main analysis) and 80 (sensitivity analysis) people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) were investigated retrospectively. The baseline characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. The data were examined over three periods of three months each: from 16th of March 2019 until 16th of June 2019 (pre-pandemic), from 1st of December 2019 until 29th of February 2020 (pre-lockdown) and from 16th of March 2020 until 16th of June 2020 (lockdown 2020), representing the very beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and the first Austrian-wide lockdown.
    RESULTS: For the main analysis, 64 individuals with T1D (22 female, 42 male), who had a mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 58.5 mmol/mol (51.0 to 69.3 mmol/mol) and a mean diabetes duration 13.5 years (5.5 to 22.0 years) were included in the analysis. The time in range (TIR[70-180mg/dL]) was the highest percentage of measures within all three studied phases, but the lockdown 2020 phase delivered the best data in all these cases. Concerning the time below range (TBR[<70mg/dL]) and the time above range (TAR[>180mg/dL]), the lockdown 2020 phase also had the best values. Regarding the sensitivity analysis, 80 individuals with T1D (26 female, 54 male), who had a mean HbA1c of 57.5 mmol/mol (51.0 to 69.3 mmol/mol) and a mean diabetes duration of 12.5 years (5.5 to 20.7 years), were included. The TIR[70-180mg/dL] was also the highest percentage of measures within all three studied phases, with the lockdown 2020 phase also delivering the best data in all these cases. The TBR[<70mg/dL] and the TAR[>180mg/dL] underscored the data in the main analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Superior glycemic control, based on all parameters analyzed, was achieved during the first Austrian-wide lockdown compared to prior periods, which might be a result of reduced daily exertion or more time spent focusing on glycemic management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥胖是糖尿病的主要危险因素。达到健康的减肥,特别是减少体内脂肪,在管理前驱糖尿病和防止进展为完全糖尿病及其合并症方面很重要。这项研究检查了个性化营养治疗(PNT)结合连续血糖监测(CGM)对糖尿病前期患者体重和组成的影响。共有30名超重或肥胖的糖尿病前期患者被随机分配到治疗方案中,观察到的CGM数据加上PNT,或在整个研究过程中不知道血糖结果的对照组。两组都提供了关于卡路里摄入量和大量营养素分布的饮食建议,再加上个性化的血糖控制和健康饮食目标设定,没有任何特别强调减轻体重或改变体力活动。每10天安排一次定期访视以进行测量并替换CGM。使用具有重复测量的通用线性模型分析数据。在30天的随访期内,两组的体重和脂肪量均显著减少.治疗组的体重和脂肪量减少了两倍,碳水化合物摄入量的显著减少,与对照组相比,花费在身体活动上的时间显着增加。此外,治疗组的依从性明显较高.这些发现表明,超重或肥胖的糖尿病前期患者可以通过个性化的血糖控制教育来实现体重减轻和身体成分改善。不完全强调减肥是首要目标。此外,CGM提供的实时反馈增强了这些改进。
    Obesity stands out as a primary risk factor for diabetes. Attaining healthy weight loss, especially reducing body fat, is important in managing prediabetes and preventing progression to full diabetes and its co-morbidities. This study examined the effects of personalized nutrition therapy (PNT) combined with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on body weight and composition in individuals with prediabetes. A total of 30 individuals with prediabetes who were overweight or obese were assigned randomly to either the treatment, observed CGM data plus PNT, or the control group which was blinded to their blood glucose results throughout the study. Both groups were provided with dietary recommendations for calorie intake and macronutrient distribution, coupled with personalized goal setting for glucose control and healthy eating, without any specific emphasis on weight reduction or changes in physical activity. Regular visits were scheduled every 10 days to perform measurements and replace CGMs. Data were analyzed using General Linear Model with repeated measures. Over the 30-day follow-up period, both groups experienced significant reductions in weight and fat mass. The treatment group exhibited two-fold greater reductions in both weight and fat mass, a significant decrease in carbohydrate intake, and a significant increase in time spent on physical activitycompared to the control group. In addition, compliance was notably higher in the treatment group. These findings indicate that overweight or obese individuals with prediabetes can achieve weight loss and improved body composition through personalized education for glucose control, without exclusively emphasizing weight loss as the primary objective. Additionally, the real-time feedback provided by CGM enhances these improvements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:1型糖尿病(T1D)影响全球900多万人,需要细致的自我管理来控制血糖(BG)。利用BG预测技术允许增加BG控制和减少由自我管理要求引起的糖尿病负担。本文综述了T1D中的BG预测模型,其中包括营养成分。
    方法:系统搜索,利用PRISMA准则,确定的文章侧重于纳入营养变量的T1DBG预测算法。筛选并分析了符合条件的研究的模型类型,在模型中包含其他方面,预测范围,患者群体,输入,和准确性。
    结果:该研究将138个血糖预测模型分类为数据驱动(54%),生理(14%),和混合(33%)类型。36%的模型使用≤30分钟的预测范围,在34%中31-60分钟,61-90分钟在11%,在10%中91-120分钟,和>120分钟在9%。神经网络是最常用的数据驱动技术(47%),简单的碳水化合物摄入量通常包含在模型中(数据驱动:72%,生理:52%,杂种:67%)。主要使用真实或自由生活数据(83%)。
    结论:T1D血糖预测的主要目标是做出明智的决策并保持安全的BG水平。考虑所有营养素对膳食计划和临床相关性的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) affects over 9 million worldwide and necessitates meticulous self-management for blood glucose (BG) control. Utilizing BG prediction technology allows for increased BG control and a reduction in the diabetes burden caused by self-management requirements. This paper reviews BG prediction models in T1D, which include nutritional components.
    METHODS: A systematic search, utilizing the PRISMA guidelines, identified articles focusing on BG prediction algorithms for T1D that incorporate nutritional variables. Eligible studies were screened and analyzed for model type, inclusion of additional aspects in the model, prediction horizon, patient population, inputs, and accuracy.
    RESULTS: The study categorizes 138 blood glucose prediction models into data-driven (54%), physiological (14%), and hybrid (33%) types. Prediction horizons of ≤30 min are used in 36% of models, 31-60 min in 34%, 61-90 min in 11%, 91-120 min in 10%, and >120 min in 9%. Neural networks are the most used data-driven technique (47%), and simple carbohydrate intake is commonly included in models (data-driven: 72%, physiological: 52%, hybrid: 67%). Real or free-living data are predominantly used (83%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The primary goal of blood glucose prediction in T1D is to enable informed decisions and maintain safe BG levels, considering the impact of all nutrients for meal planning and clinical relevance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在儿科人群中引入闭环系统是糖尿病管理和发展的革命。然而,在喂养的情况下,发表的研究并不多,时间表,儿童的活动偏离了系统编程的常规,就像糖尿病儿童和青少年夏令营一样,其中该设备的具体编程是未知的。这是一项单中心前瞻性初步研究。共有27名患者(平均年龄11.9±1.9岁,40%男性,包括糖尿病的持续时间6.44±2.83年)(20个使用MedtronicMiniMed780G系统,7个使用串联控制IQ)。在7天的训练营和随后的3周内监测血糖变量和泵功能。在任何时刻都没有从目标TIR降低70%。在“低于范围的时间”中,最差的结果是在营地开始后72小时,在超出范围时间中最差的结果是在最初的24小时,在那之后有了进步。没有发生3级低血糖或酮症酸中毒。在两个集成系统中使用特定的编程,在复杂的血糖调节算法和没有准备的情况下,体力活动水平增加或喂养程序突然变化,我们的儿科1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的3级低血糖和酮症酸中毒的风险没有增加,无论闭环设备。
    The introduction of closed-loop systems in the pediatric population has been a revolution in the management and evolution of diabetes. However, there are not many published studies in situations in which the feeding, schedules, and activities of the children deviate from the routine for which the systems were programmed, as in the case of a summer camp for children and adolescents with diabetes, where the specific programming of this device is not well known. It was a single-center prospective preliminary study. A total of twenty-seven patients (mean age 11.9 ± 1.9 years, 40% male, duration of diabetes 6.44 ± 2.83 years) were included (twenty with Medtronic MiniMed 780G system and seven with Tandem Control-IQ). Glucometric variables and pump functionality were monitored during the 7-day camp and in the following 3 weeks. There was no decrease from the objective TIR 70% at any moment. The worst results in Time Below Range were at 72 h from starting the camp, and the worst results in Time Above Range were in the first 24 h, with a progressive improvement after that. No episodes of level 3 hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred. The use of specific programming in two integrated systems, with complex blood glucose regulation algorithms and not-prepared-for situations with increased levels of physical activity or abrupt changes in feeding routines, did not result in an increased risk of level 3 hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis for our pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients, regardless of the closed-loop device.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:糖尿病远程医疗地中海饮食(DiaTeleMed)研究是一项完全远程随机临床试验,旨在评估2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的个性化饮食管理。该研究旨在测试个性化行为方法对中度控制的T2D饮食管理的有效性,与使用一刀切的饮食建议的标准化行为干预相比,与常规护理控制(UCC)相比。主要结果将比较每种干预对血糖波动平均幅度(MAGE)的影响。
    方法:符合条件的参与者年龄在21至80岁之间,诊断为中度控制的T2D(HbA1c:6.0%至8.0%),并根据单独的生活方式或生活方式加二甲双胍进行管理。参与者必须愿意并且能够参加虚拟咨询会议,并将膳食记录到饮食跟踪智能手机应用程序(DayTwo)中,并佩戴连续血糖监测仪(CGM)长达12天。参与者被随机分配(每个手臂n=255,n=85)到三个手臂之一:(1)个性化,(2)标准化,或(3)UCC。测量发生在0(基线),3和6个月。所有参与者都接受等热量能量和大量营养素目标,以满足地中海饮食指南。除了14名6个月以上的干预接触者(每周4次,每10次)外,还包括糖尿病自我管理教育.前4个UCC干预联系人通过同步视频会议传递,然后是教育视频链接。标准化的参与者获得与UCC部门相同的教育内容,遵循相同的时间表。然而,所有干预联系都是通过同步视频会议进行的,与基于社会认知理论(SCT)的行为咨询相结合,再加上使用移动应用程序,提供对卡路里和大量营养素的实时反馈计划膳食的饮食自我监控。个性化手臂的参与者接受标准化干预的所有要素,除了对登录到移动应用程序的膳食和零食的预测餐后血糖反应(PPGR)的实时反馈。
    结论:DiaTeleMed研究旨在通过确定行为咨询和个性化营养建议对T2D患者血糖控制的贡献来解决当前精准营养领域的一个重要差距。该研究的完全远程方法允许在人群水平上的可扩展性和个性化饮食建议的创新交付。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05046886。2021年9月16日注册。
    BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Telemedicine Mediterranean Diet (DiaTeleMed) Study is a fully remote randomized clinical trial evaluating personalized dietary management in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The study aims to test the efficacy of a personalized behavioral approach for dietary management of moderately controlled T2D, versus a standardized behavioral intervention that uses one-size-fits-all dietary recommendations, versus a usual care control (UCC). The primary outcome will compare the impact of each intervention on the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE).
    METHODS: Eligible participants are between 21 and 80 years of age diagnosed with moderately controlled T2D (HbA1c: 6.0 to 8.0%) and managed on lifestyle alone or lifestyle plus metformin. Participants must be willing and able to attend virtual counseling sessions and log meals into a dietary tracking smartphone application (DayTwo), and wear a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for up to 12 days. Participants are randomized with equal allocation (n = 255, n = 85 per arm) to one of three arms: (1) Personalized, (2) Standardized, or (3) UCC. Measurements occur at 0 (baseline), 3, and 6 months. All participants receive isocaloric energy and macronutrient targets to meet Mediterranean diet guidelines, in addition to 14 intervention contacts over 6 months (4 weekly then 10 biweekly) to cover diabetes self-management education. The first 4 UCC intervention contacts are delivered via synchronous videoconferences followed by educational video links. Participants in Standardized receive the same educational content as those in the UCC arm, following the same schedule. However, all intervention contacts are conducted via synchronous videoconferences, paired with Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)-based behavioral counseling, plus dietary self-monitoring of planned meals using a mobile app that provides real-time feedback on calories and macronutrients. Participants in the Personalized arm receive all elements of the Standardized intervention, in addition to real-time feedback on predicted post-prandial glycemic response (PPGR) to meals and snacks logged into the mobile app.
    CONCLUSIONS: The DiaTeleMed Study aims to address an important gap in the current landscape of precision nutrition by determining the contributions of behavioral counseling and personalized nutrition recommendations on glycemic control in individuals with T2D. The fully remote methodology of the study allows for scalability and innovative delivery of personalized dietary recommendations at a population level.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05046886. Registered on September 16, 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:糖尿病是美国第八大死亡原因。结构性种族主义和系统性压迫导致的不平等导致了糖尿病患病率的种族/族裔差异,诊断,和治疗。糖尿病自我管理培训(DSMT)远程血糖监测(RGM),和来自社区卫生工作者(CHW)的量身定制的支持有可能改善结果。本研究将检查这些干预措施在安全网医疗保健环境中的实施情况。
    方法:使用实施科学和种族公平原则,本研究旨在(1)评估适当性;(2)测量保真度;(3)比较改变三种干预措施的组合和顺序的有效性.探索性目标将衡量干预措施依从性和吸收的可持续性。这个混合方法试验采用了一个顺序,多重分配随机试验(SMART)设计,患者焦点小组讨论,和员工面试。符合条件的黑人/拉丁患者将使用从电子病历系统中提取的患者名单进行招募。经过详细的筛选过程,符合条件的患者将被邀请参加面对面的登记预约。将获得知情同意,患者将被随机分配到DSMT或RGM。6个月时,患者将完成两项评估(糖尿病授权和糖尿病相关的痛苦),和HbA1c值将被审查。“响应者”将被认为是HbA1c至少提高了一个百分点的人。“响应者”保留在他们指定的第一个研究小组中。“无应答者”将被随机分配以切换研究臂或与CHW配对。6个月后,参与者将再次完成两次评估,和他们的HbA1c将被审查。十二个患者焦点小组,每条干预路径有两条,将与员工面试一起进行。
    结论:这项研究是第一个,根据我们的知识,旨在填补我们对在安全网医院接受护理的黑人和拉丁患者中支持糖尿病管理的最佳干预措施顺序和组合的知识中的关键空白。通过实现研究目标,我们将为优化公平的糖尿病管理并最终减少生活在投资不足的城市环境中的患者的种族和族裔医疗保健差异建立证据。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT06040463。2023年9月7日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the eighth leading cause of death in the USA. Inequities driven by structural racism and systemic oppression have led to racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment. Diabetes-self management training (DSMT), remote glucose monitoring (RGM), and tailored support from a community health worker (CHW) have the potential to improve outcomes. This study will examine the implementation of these interventions in a safety-net healthcare setting.
    METHODS: Using implementation science and racial equity principles, this study aims to (1) evaluate the appropriateness; (2) measure fidelity; and (3) compare the effectiveness of varying the combination and sequence of three interventions. An exploratory aim will measure sustainability of intervention adherence and uptake. This mixed-methods trial employs a sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design, patient focus group discussions, and staff interviews. Eligible Black/Latine patients will be recruited using patient lists extracted from the electronic medical record system. After a detailed screening process, eligible patients will be invited to attend an in-person enrollment appointment. Informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized to either DSMT or RGM. At 6 months, patients will complete two assessments (diabetes empowerment and diabetes-related distress), and HbA1c values will be reviewed. \"Responders\" will be considered those who have an HbA1c that has improved by at least one percentage point. \"Responders\" remain in their first assigned study arm. \"Nonresponders\" will be randomized to either switch study arms or be paired with a CHW. At 6 months participants will complete two assessments again, and their HbA1c will be reviewed. Twelve patient focus groups, two for each intervention paths, will be conducted along with staff interviews.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first, to our knowledge, that seeks to fill critical gaps in our knowledge of optimal sequence and combinations of interventions to support diabetes management among Black and Latine patients receiving care at a safety-net hospital. By achieving the study aims, we will build the evidence for optimizing equitable diabetes management and ultimately reducing racial and ethnic healthcare disparities for patients living in disinvested urban settings.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06040463. Registered on September 7, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于中国饮食结构的复杂性和独特性,1型糖尿病(T1D)患者在血糖控制方面面临独特的挑战,特别是在餐后血糖反应(PPGR)方面。本研究旨在建立T1D患者PPGR的个性化预测模型。
    资料由云南省第一人民医院提供,13例T1D患者,被招募并接受至少两周的干预。在研究期间,要求所有患者在自由生活条件下佩戴连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)装置。为了应对可穿戴设备用于CGM测量的不完整数据的挑战,本文采用GAIN方法实现了一个更合理的插值过程。在这项研究中,计算患者的PPGR,并基于贝叶斯超参数优化算法和随机搜索算法构建了LightGBM预测模型,综合葡萄糖测量,胰岛素剂量,膳食营养成分,血液测量和人体测量作为输入。
    实验结果表明,与仅碳水化合物含量模型(R=0.14)和模拟胰岛素治疗标准的基线模型(R=0.43)相比,本文提出的PPGR预测模型具有更高的准确性(R=0.63)。此外,使用SHAP方法对模型的解释表明,餐时的血糖水平和餐前30分钟的血糖趋势是模型的最重要特征.
    所提出的模型在预测T1D患者的PPGR方面提供了更高的精度,从而更好地指导T1D患者的饮食计划和胰岛素摄入剂量。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) face unique challenges in glycaemic control due to the complexity and uniqueness of the dietary structure in China, especially in terms of postprandial glycaemic response (PPGR). This study aimed to establish a personalized model for predicting PPGR in patients with T1D.
    UNASSIGNED: Data provided by the First People\'s Hospital of Yunnan Province, 13 patients with T1D, were recruited and provided with an intervention for at least two weeks. All patients were asked to wear a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device under free-living conditions during the study period. To tackle the challenge of incomplete data from wearable devices for CGM measurements, the GAIN method was used in this paper to achieve a more rational interpolation process. In this study, patients\' PPGRs were calculated, and a LightGBM prediction model was constructed based on a Bayesian hyperparameter optimisation algorithm and a random search algorithm, which integrated glucose measurement, insulin dose, dietary nutrient content, blood measurement and anthropometry as inputs.
    UNASSIGNED: The experimental outcomes revealed that the PPGR prediction model presented in this paper demonstrated superior accuracy (R=0.63) compared to both the carbohydrate content only model (R=0.14) and the baseline model emulating the standard of care for insulin administration (R=0.43). In addition, the interpretation of the model using the SHAP method showed that blood glucose levels at meals and blood glucose trends 30 minutes before meals were the most important features of the model.
    UNASSIGNED: The proposed model offers a heightened precision in predicting PPGR in patients with T1D, so it can better guide the diet plan and insulin intake dose of patients with T1D.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号