Biofeedback

生物反馈
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本综述旨在确定步态训练干预措施是否会影响慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者行走过程中的下肢生物力学。
    方法:在PubMed,CINAHL,SPORTDiscus,和MEDLINE确定从开始到2022年9月的英语学习。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验,重复措施设计,和描述性实验室研究,测量步态训练干预期间或之后对生物力学结果的影响(运动学,动力学,肌电图)在CAI个体行走期间。步态训练干预措施大致分为设备(失稳设备,新型步态训练装置)和生物反馈(视觉,听觉,和触觉传递模式)。适当时使用随机效应进行荟萃分析,以比较步态训练干预前后的平均差异和标准偏差。
    结果:共纳入13项研究。仅对单次步态训练研究进行荟萃分析。11项研究报告了动力学结果。我们的荟萃分析显示,压力中心(COP)的位置从姿势的0-90%(效应大小[ES]范围=0.35-0.82)向内移动,足前内侧接触时间减少(ES=0.43),足中外侧的峰值压力降低(ES=1.18),并增加(ES=0.59),外侧足跟(ES=0.33)和外侧足中(ES=1.22)的压力时间积分降低,而外侧足跟(ES=0.63)的压力时间积分升高。三项研究报告了运动学结果。7项研究报告了肌电图结果。我们的荟萃分析显示,初次接触(IC)后长腓骨的活动增加(ES=0.83)。
    结论:步态训练方案改善了CAI患者的一些下肢生物力学结果。足底压力结果测量似乎受步态训练计划的影响最大,与外侧踝关节扭伤风险增加相关的外侧压力降低的改善。步态训练增加了腓骨长肌IC后的EMG活性。很少有研究评估多阶段步态训练对生物力学结果指标的影响。在治疗CAI患者时,应考虑有针对性的步态训练。
    OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to determine if gait training interventions influence lower extremity biomechanics during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI).
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE to identify English-language studies from inception through September 2022. Eligible studies included randomized control trials, repeated measures design, and descriptive laboratory studies measuring the effects during or following a gait training intervention on biomechanical outcomes (kinematics, kinetics, electromyography) during walking in individuals with CAI. Gait training interventions were broadly categorized into devices (destabilization devices, novel gait training device) and biofeedback (visual, auditory, and haptic delivery modes). Meta-analyses were conducted when appropriate using random-effects to compare pre-and post- gait training intervention mean differences and standard deviations.
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for single session gait training studies only. Eleven studies reported kinetic outcomes. Our meta-analyses showed location of center of pressure (COP) was shifted medially from 0-90% (Effect Size [ES] range=0.35-0.82) of stance, contact time was decreased in medial forefoot (ES=0.43), peak pressure was decreased for lateral midfoot (ES=1.18) and increased for hallux (ES=0.59), pressure time integral was decreased for lateral heel (ES=0.33) and lateral midfoot (ES=1.22) and increased for hallux (ES=0.63). Three studies reported kinematic outcomes. Seven studies reported electromyography outcomes. Our meta-analyses revealed increased activity following initial contact (IC) for fibularis longus (ES=0.83).
    CONCLUSIONS: Gait training protocols improved some lower extremity biomechanical outcomes in individuals with CAI. Plantar pressure outcome measures seem to be most impacted by gait training programs with improvements in decreasing lateral pressure associated with increased risk for lateral ankle sprains. Gait training increased EMG activity post-IC for the fibularis longus. Few studies have assessed the impact of multi-session gait training on biomechanical outcome measures. Targeted gait trainning should be considered when treating patients with CAI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述全面介绍了医学领域和康复领域中神经反馈和脑机接口(BCI)的最新发展。通过分析和比较各种工具和技术获得的结果,我们的目标是提供有关神经反馈和所利用的输入数据的不同模式的BCI应用的系统理解。我们的主要目标是解决元评论领域现有的差距,这提供了更全面的领域展望,允许评估BCI范围内的当前景观和发展。我们的主要方法包括荟萃分析,使用相关关键字的搜索查询,和基于网络的方法。我们致力于对BCI研究进行公正的评估,阐明该领域研究发展的主要载体。我们的审查涵盖了各种各样的应用,结合使用脑机接口进行康复和各种诊断的治疗,包括那些与情感谱系障碍有关的。通过涵盖各种各样的用例,我们的目标是提供一个更全面的观点,在不同的背景下利用神经反馈治疗。结构化和有组织的信息呈现,辅以随附的可视化和图表,使这篇评论成为从事生物反馈和脑机接口领域的科学家和研究人员的宝贵资源。
    This review provides a comprehensive examination of recent developments in both neurofeedback and brain-computer interface (BCI) within the medical field and rehabilitation. By analyzing and comparing results obtained with various tools and techniques, we aim to offer a systematic understanding of BCI applications concerning different modalities of neurofeedback and input data utilized. Our primary objective is to address the existing gap in the area of meta-reviews, which provides a more comprehensive outlook on the field, allowing for the assessment of the current landscape and developments within the scope of BCI. Our main methodologies include meta-analysis, search queries employing relevant keywords, and a network-based approach. We are dedicated to delivering an unbiased evaluation of BCI studies, elucidating the primary vectors of research development in this field. Our review encompasses a diverse range of applications, incorporating the use of brain-computer interfaces for rehabilitation and the treatment of various diagnoses, including those related to affective spectrum disorders. By encompassing a wide variety of use cases, we aim to offer a more comprehensive perspective on the utilization of neurofeedback treatments across different contexts. The structured and organized presentation of information, complemented by accompanying visualizations and diagrams, renders this review a valuable resource for scientists and researchers engaged in the domains of biofeedback and brain-computer interfaces.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨生物反馈(BF)对非神经功能障碍(NDV)患儿康复的影响。
    方法:RCT从各种数据库中检索(从开始到2024年2月29日发布)。比较了BF和非BF处理的效果。使用随机效应模型来评估组合数据。
    结果:荟萃分析显示BF增加了最大尿流率(SMD=3.78,95%CI1.33~6.22),改善排尿时间(SMD=5.88,95%CI3.75~8.01),并降低了尿路感染后残留(SMD=-19.18,95%CI-27.03~-11.33)和尿路感染发生率(RR=0.43,95%CI0.21~0.87)。肌电图活动(RR=0.46,95%CI0.25~0.84)和排尿异常模式(RR=0.51,95%CI0.35~0.74)改善,效果持续超过1年。然而,仅随访1年后,BF对NDV患儿平均尿流率的影响才有统计学意义(SMD=1.90,95%CI0.87~2.92)。
    结论:现有证据表明,BF可以增强NDV患儿的尿路参数和模式。然而,它在解决便秘方面的有效性,白天尿失禁,夜间尿失禁并不严重。高质量的随机对照试验可以提供更多的见解。
    OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of biofeedback (BF) on the rehabilitation of children with nonneurological dysfunctional voiding (NDV).
    METHODS: RCTs were retrieved from various databases (published from inception to February 29, 2024). The effects of the BF and non-BF treatments were compared. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the combined data.
    RESULTS: Meta-analysis revealed that BF increased the maximum urinary flow rate (SMD = 3.78, 95% CI 1.33∼6.22), improved urination time (SMD = 5.88, 95% CI 3.75∼8.01), and reduced the postvoid residual (SMD = -19.18, 95% CI -27.03∼-11.33) and urinary tract infection incidence (RR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.21∼0.87). Electromyogram activity (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25∼0.84) and abnormal urination patterns (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.35∼0.74) improved, with effects persisting for more than 1 year. However, the effect of BF on the mean urinary flow rate in children with NDV was significant only after 1 year of follow-up (SMD = 1.90, 95% CI 0.87∼2.92).
    CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence indicates that BF can enhance urinary parameters and patterns in children with NDV. However, its effectiveness in addressing constipation, daytime urinary incontinence, and nocturnal urinary incontinence is not substantial. High-quality randomized controlled trials can offer additional insights.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    跑步者的数量和与跑步相关的伤害(RRI)的发生率都在上升。实时生物反馈步态再训练为RRI预防提供了一种有前途的方法。然而,由于研究设计和报告结果的多样性,不同形式的反馈对跑步步态生物力学的影响仍存在不确定性.三个数据库:MEDLINE,pubmed,和SPORTDiscus进行了搜索,以确定截至2024年3月发表的相关研究,产生了4646篇文章供审查。使用Downs和Black质量检查表评估纳入研究的质量。主要结果,包括胫骨峰值加速度(PTA),垂直平均加载速率(VALR),和垂直瞬时加载速率(VILR),通过荟萃分析进行分析。24项研究符合纳入标准,并在本次审查中进行了分析。17项使用视觉生物反馈(VB),而14项选择听觉生物反馈(AB)。荟萃分析显示,在干预后和长期训练后,加载变量均减少。视觉和听觉反馈。值得注意的是,训练后负荷变量的减少更为明显,VB被证明比AB更有效。实时生物反馈干预在降低与RRI相关的负载变量方面是有效的。持续训练的影响更大,VB在有效性方面优于AB。
    The number of runners and the incidence of running-related injuries (RRIs) are on the rise. Real-time biofeedback gait retraining offers a promising approach to RRIs prevention. However, due to the diversity in study designs and reported outcomes, there remains uncertainty regarding the efficacy of different forms of feedback on running gait biomechanics. Three databases: MEDLINE, PUBMED, and SPORTDiscus were searched to identify relevant studies published up to March 2024, yielding 4646 articles for review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black Quality checklist. Primary outcomes, including Peak Tibial Acceleration (PTA), Vertical Average Loading Rate (VALR), and Vertical Instantaneous Loading Rate (VILR), were analysed through meta-analysis. 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed in this review.17 used visual biofeedback (VB) while 14 chose auditory biofeedback (AB). The meta-analysis revealed a reduction in loading variables both immediately following the intervention and after extended training, with both visual and auditory feedback. Notably, the decrease in loading variables was more pronounced post-training and VB proved to be more effective than AB. Real-time biofeedback interventions are effective in lowering loading variables associated with RRIs. The impact is more substantial with sustained training, and VB outperforms AB in terms of effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一种复杂的疾病,与一系列持续的症状相关,包括头痛,认知功能障碍,精神疲劳,失眠,和情绪障碍。TBI相关症状的常规治疗可能不足,导致对互补和综合医学(CIM)方法的兴趣。这篇全面的文章考察了现有的关于CIM模式的文献,包括身心干预,针灸/指压,草药,营养补充剂,生物反馈,瑜伽,和太极拳治疗TBI后继发并发症。这篇文章强调了CIM模式的潜在好处和局限性,同时承认需要进一步研究,以更好地确定在这一特定人群中的疗效和安全性。
    Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex condition associated with a range of persistent symptoms including headaches, cognitive dysfunction, mental fatigue, insomnia, and mood disorders. Conventional treatments for TBI-related symptoms can be insufficient, leading to interest in complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) approaches. This comprehensive article examines the existing literature on CIM modalities, including mind-body interventions, acupuncture/acupressure, herbal remedies, nutritional supplements, biofeedback, yoga, and tai chi in the context of managing secondary complications following TBI. The article highlights potential benefits and limitations of CIM modalities, while acknowledging the need for further research to better establish efficacy and safety in this specific population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    交互感受障碍越来越多地与许多身心健康状况有关。因此,有针对性的治疗性干预措施,以相互感受缺陷为目标。心率和心率变异性生物反馈治疗(HR(V)-BF),干预措施,训练个人调节他们的心血管信号,并通过呼吸将这些信号限制在最佳参数内,可以通过刺激迷走神经增强感觉通路的功能。因此,这篇叙述性系统综述试图综合文献的现状,关于HR(V)-BF作为跨行为的交互感受干预的潜力,与相互感觉相关的生理和神经结果测量。总的来说,这篇综述包括77篇论文,大多数人使用生理结果测量。总的来说,在HR(V)-BF后结局指标的改善方面,研究结果喜忧参半。然而,趋势表明,当采用共振频率呼吸和高强度治疗方案时,对与相互感觉相关的措施的影响更强。基于这些发现,我们提出了一个三阶段模型,通过该模型,HR(V)-BF可以改善互感,该模型借鉴了互感推理和预测编码的原理。此外,我们为未来的研究提供了具体的方向,这将有助于推进当前的知识状态。
    Interoceptive dysfunctions are increasingly implicated in a number of physical and mental health conditions. Accordingly, there is a pertinent need for therapeutic interventions which target interoceptive deficits. Heartrate and heartrate variability biofeedback therapy (HR(V)-BF), interventions which train individuals to regulate their cardiovascular signals and constrain these within optimal parameters through breathing, could enhance the functioning of interoceptive pathways via stimulation of the vagus nerve. Consequently, this narrative systematic review sought to synthesise the current state of the literature with regard to the potential of HR(V)-BF as an interoceptive intervention across behavioural, physiological and neural outcome measures related to interoception. In total, 77 papers were included in this review, with the majority using physiological outcome measures. Overall, findings were mixed with respect to improvements in the outcome measures after HR(V)-BF. However, trends suggested that effects on measures related to interoception were stronger when resonance frequency breathing and an intense treatment protocol were employed. Based on these findings, we propose a three-stage model by which HR(V)-BF may improve interoception which draws upon principles of interoceptive inference and predictive coding. Furthermore, we provide specific directions for future research, which will serve to advance the current knowledge state.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定除尿路治疗外的二级管理策略对BBD结局的影响。
    方法:审查方案是前瞻性注册的(CRD42023422168)。MEDLINE,Embase,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,CINAHL,搜索了Scopus(数据库启动至2023年6月)。包括二级管理策略与仅常规尿路治疗的比较研究。两位作者独立筛选了标题/摘要,并回顾了全文文章。两位作者提取了与研究特征相关的数据,方法论,主题,和结果。
    结果:在对18项研究和1228名儿童的系统评价和荟萃分析中,二级管理策略(家庭教育,生物反馈,和物理治疗)与减轻症状负担有关,减少复发性尿路感染,与仅接受保守治疗的尿路治疗的儿童相比,改善了尿流测定结果。
    结论:虽然存在显著的报告异质性,二级保守管理策略,如家庭教育,生物反馈或认知行为疗法,以理疗为基础的教育与减少尿失禁有关,感染,和异常的尿流测量结果。
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effect of secondary management strategies in addition to urotherapy on bowel bladder dysfunction outcomes.
    METHODS: The review protocol was prospectively registered (CRD42023422168). MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Scopus (database initiation until June 2023) were searched. Comparative studies of secondary management strategies vs conventional urotherapy alone were included. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and reviewed full-text articles. Two authors extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, subjects, and results.
    RESULTS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 studies and 1228 children, secondary management strategies (home-based education, biofeedback, and physical therapy) were associated with reduced symptom burden, fewer recurrent urinary tract infections, and improved uroflowmetry findings than children treated solely with urotherapy for conservative management.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although there is significant reporting heterogeneity, secondary conservative management strategies such as home education, biofeedback or cognitive behavioral therapy, and physiotherapy-based education are associated with less urinary incontinence, fewer infections, and fewer abnormal uroflowmetry findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与工作有关的疾病和失调仍然是一个重大的全球健康问题,需要采取多方面的缓解措施。一种潜在的措施是通过可穿戴运动捕捉系统利用增强反馈的工作技术训练。然而,关于其在实际工作环境和受控环境中的当前有效性存在研究空白,以及它在短期内减少姿势暴露和保留效应的能力,中等,和长持续时间。进行了快速审查,利用两个数据库和三个以前的文献综述来确定过去二十年内发表的相关研究,包括直到2023年底的最新文献。16项研究符合纳入标准,其中14个质量高或中等。这些研究进行了描述性总结,并评估了证据的强度。在纳入的研究中,六个被评为高质量,而八个被认为是中等质量。值得注意的是,参与率的报告,对评估员致盲,和先验功率计算很少执行。四项研究是在真实的工作环境中进行的,十项是在受控环境中进行的。振动反馈是最常用的反馈类型(n=9),其次是听觉(n=7)和视觉反馈(n=1)。所有研究都采用了由系统发起的纠正性反馈。在受控环境中,关于可穿戴运动捕捉系统增强反馈减少姿势暴露的有效性的证据从强有力的证据到没有证据,取决于反馈管理后经过的时间。相反,对于在真实工作环境中进行的研究,证据从非常有限的证据到没有证据。确定并讨论了未来的延伸需求。
    Work-related diseases and disorders remain a significant global health concern, necessitating multifaceted measures for mitigation. One potential measure is work technique training utilizing augmented feedback through wearable motion capture systems. However, there exists a research gap regarding its current effectiveness in both real work environments and controlled settings, as well as its ability to reduce postural exposure and retention effects over short, medium, and long durations. A rapid review was conducted, utilizing two databases and three previous literature reviews to identify relevant studies published within the last twenty years, including recent literature up to the end of 2023. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 were of high or moderate quality. These studies were summarized descriptively, and the strength of evidence was assessed. Among the included studies, six were rated as high quality, while eight were considered moderate quality. Notably, the reporting of participation rates, blinding of assessors, and a-priori power calculations were infrequently performed. Four studies were conducted in real work environments, while ten were conducted in controlled settings. Vibration feedback was the most common feedback type utilized (n = 9), followed by auditory (n = 7) and visual feedback (n = 1). All studies employed corrective feedback initiated by the system. In controlled environments, evidence regarding the effectiveness of augmented feedback from wearable motion capture systems to reduce postural exposure ranged from strong evidence to no evidence, depending on the time elapsed after feedback administration. Conversely, for studies conducted in real work environments, the evidence ranged from very limited evidence to no evidence. Future reach needs are identified and discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脑电图-神经反馈(EEG-NF)训练领域在治疗各种精神障碍方面显示出巨大的希望,同时也成为各种应用的认知增强剂。EEG-NF的核心原理涉及有意识地引导大脑朝着期望的方向,需要长时间积极参与神经反馈(NF)任务。音乐聆听任务已被证明是这种训练的有效刺激,影响情绪,心情,和脑电波模式。这刺激了音乐NF系统和训练协议的发展。尽管取得了这些进步,在全面探索和讨论反馈机制的各种模式的系统文献中存在差距,它的好处,以及新兴的应用。解决这个差距,我们的评论文章提供了一个全面的文献调查,包括对音乐NF在过去十年中进行的研究。这篇综述强调了从神经康复到治疗干预的几个好处和应用。压力管理,神经系统疾病的诊断,和运动性能增强。虽然承认音乐NF的优势和普及,文献中存在增长的机会,即需要进行系统的随机对照试验,以将其有效性与不同任务中的其他模式进行比较.解决这一差距将涉及开发研究协议和优化参数的标准化方法,为推进该领域提供了令人兴奋的前景。
    The field of EEG-Neurofeedback (EEG-NF) training has showcased significant promise in treating various mental disorders, while also emerging as a cognitive enhancer across diverse applications. The core principle of EEG-NF involves consciously guiding the brain in desired directions, necessitating active engagement in neurofeedback (NF) tasks over an extended period. Music listening tasks have proven to be effective stimuli for such training, influencing emotions, mood, and brainwave patterns. This has spurred the development of musical NF systems and training protocols. Despite these advancements, there exists a gap in systematic literature that comprehensively explores and discusses the various modalities of feedback mechanisms, its benefits, and the emerging applications. Addressing this gap, our review article presents a thorough literature survey encompassing studies on musical NF conducted over the past decade. This review highlights the several benefits and applications ranging from neurorehabilitation to therapeutic interventions, stress management, diagnostics of neurological disorders, and sports performance enhancement. While acknowledged for advantages and popularity of musical NF, there is an opportunity for growth in the literature in terms of the need for systematic randomized controlled trials to compare its effectiveness with other modalities across different tasks. Addressing this gap will involve developing standardized methodologies for studying protocols and optimizing parameters, presenting an exciting prospect for advancing the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于传感器的干预(SI)已被建议作为改善老年人功能表现的替代康复治疗方法。然而,不同传感器技术在改善步态和平衡方面的有效性尚不清楚,需要进一步研究.
    方法:十个数据库(学术搜索总理;护理和相关健康文献累积指数,完成;Cochrane中央对照试验登记册;MEDLINE;PubMed;WebofScience;公开论文;开放灰色;ProQuest;和灰色文献报告)已搜索截至2022年12月20日发表的相关文章。常规功能评估,包括定时启动(TUG)测试,正常的步态速度,伯格平衡量表(BBS),6分钟步行测试(6MWT),和下降疗效量表-国际(FES-I),作为反映步态和平衡表现的评价结果。我们首先对SI的有效性进行了荟萃分析,其中包括光学传感器(OPTS),感知传感器(PCPS),和可穿戴传感器(WS),与对照组相比,其中包括非治疗干预(NTI)和传统体育锻炼干预(TPEI)。我们进一步进行了分组分析,以比较SI(OPTS,PCPS,和WS)与TPEI组进行比较,并将每个SI亚型与对照(NTI和TPEI)和TPEI组进行比较。
    结果:我们扫描了6255篇文章,并对58项选定的试验进行了荟萃分析(样本量=2713)。结果表明,SI组在改善步态和平衡性能方面明显优于对照组或TPEI组(p<0.000)。OPTS组和TPEI组之间的亚组荟萃分析显示,TUG检验的有效性存在明显的统计学差异(平均差异(MD)=-0.681s;p<0.000),正常步态速度(MD=4.244cm/s;p<0.000),BBS(MD=2.325;p=0.001),6MWT(MD=25.166m;p<0.000),和FES-I评分(MD=-2.036;p=0.036)。PCPS组与TPEI组在步态和平衡评估正常步态速度(MD=4.382cm/s;p=0.034)方面也有统计学上的显著差异。BBS(MD=1.874;p<0.000),6MWT(MD=21.904m;p<0.000),和FES-I得分(MD=-1.161;p<0.000),除了TUG测试(MD=-0.226s;p=0.106)。WS组与对照组之间的TUG检验(MD=-1.255s;p=0.101)或正常步态速度(MD=6.682cm/s;p=0.109)无统计学差异。
    结论:SI与生物反馈对老年人混合人群的步态和平衡改善具有积极作用。具体来说,OPTS和PCPS组在改善步态和平衡性能方面在统计学上优于TPEI组。而只有BBS和6MWT的组比较才能达到最小的临床重要差异。此外,与对照组相比,WS组对步态和平衡改善没有统计学或临床上显着的积极作用。建议进行更多研究以验证特定SI的有效性。研究注册PROSPERO平台:CRD42022362817。2022年7月10日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Sensor-based interventions (SI) have been suggested as an alternative rehabilitation treatment to improve older adults\' functional performance. However, the effectiveness of different sensor technologies in improving gait and balance remains unclear and requires further investigation.
    METHODS: Ten databases (Academic Search Premier; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Complete; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; PubMed; Web of Science; OpenDissertations; Open grey; ProQuest; and Grey literature report) were searched for relevant articles published up to December 20, 2022. Conventional functional assessments, including the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, normal gait speed, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Falling Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), were used as the evaluation outcomes reflecting gait and balance performance. We first meta-analyzed the effectiveness of SI, which included optical sensors (OPTS), perception sensors (PCPS), and wearable sensors (WS), compared with control groups, which included non-treatment intervention (NTI) and traditional physical exercise intervention (TPEI). We further conducted sub-group analysis to compare the effectiveness of SI (OPTS, PCPS, and WS) with TPEI groups and compared each SI subtype with control (NTI and TPEI) and TPEI groups.
    RESULTS: We scanned 6255 articles and performed meta-analyses of 58 selected trials (sample size = 2713). The results showed that SI groups were significantly more effective than control or TPEI groups (p < 0.000) in improving gait and balance performance. The subgroup meta-analyses between OPTS groups and TPEI groups revealed clear statistically significant differences in effectiveness for TUG test (mean difference (MD) = - 0.681 s; p < 0.000), normal gait speed (MD = 4.244 cm/s; p < 0.000), BBS (MD = 2.325; p = 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 25.166 m; p < 0.000), and FES-I scores (MD = - 2.036; p = 0.036). PCPS groups also presented statistically significant differences with TPEI groups in gait and balance assessments for normal gait speed (MD = 4.382 cm/s; p = 0.034), BBS (MD = 1.874; p < 0.000), 6MWT (MD = 21.904 m; p < 0.000), and FES-I scores (MD = - 1.161; p < 0.000), except for the TUG test (MD = - 0.226 s; p = 0.106). There were no statistically significant differences in TUG test (MD = - 1.255 s; p = 0.101) or normal gait speed (MD = 6.682 cm/s; p = 0.109) between WS groups and control groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: SI with biofeedback has a positive effect on gait and balance improvement among a mixed population of older adults. Specifically, OPTS and PCPS groups were statistically better than TPEI groups at improving gait and balance performance, whereas only the group comparison in BBS and 6MWT can reach the minimal clinically important difference. Moreover, WS groups showed no statistically or clinically significant positive effect on gait and balance improvement compared with control groups. More studies are recommended to verify the effectiveness of specific SI. Research registration PROSPERO platform: CRD42022362817. Registered on 7/10/2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号