Abstract：
The number of runners and the incidence of running-related injuries (RRIs) are on the rise. Real-time biofeedback gait retraining offers a promising approach to RRIs prevention. However, due to the diversity in study designs and reported outcomes, there remains uncertainty regarding the efficacy of different forms of feedback on running gait biomechanics. Three databases: MEDLINE, PUBMED, and SPORTDiscus were searched to identify relevant studies published up to March 2024, yielding 4646 articles for review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black Quality checklist. Primary outcomes, including Peak Tibial Acceleration (PTA), Vertical Average Loading Rate (VALR), and Vertical Instantaneous Loading Rate (VILR), were analysed through meta-analysis. 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed in this review.17 used visual biofeedback (VB) while 14 chose auditory biofeedback (AB). The meta-analysis revealed a reduction in loading variables both immediately following the intervention and after extended training, with both visual and auditory feedback. Notably, the decrease in loading variables was more pronounced post-training and VB proved to be more effective than AB. Real-time biofeedback interventions are effective in lowering loading variables associated with RRIs. The impact is more substantial with sustained training, and VB outperforms AB in terms of effectiveness.
摘要：
跑步者的数量和与跑步相关的伤害（RRI）的发生率都在上升。实时生物反馈步态再训练为RRI预防提供了一种有前途的方法。然而,由于研究设计和报告结果的多样性，不同形式的反馈对跑步步态生物力学的影响仍存在不确定性.三个数据库:MEDLINE,pubmed,和SPORTDiscus进行了搜索，以确定截至2024年3月发表的相关研究，产生了4646篇文章供审查。使用Downs和Black质量检查表评估纳入研究的质量。主要结果,包括胫骨峰值加速度（PTA），垂直平均加载速率(VALR)，和垂直瞬时加载速率(VILR)，通过荟萃分析进行分析。24项研究符合纳入标准，并在本次审查中进行了分析。17项使用视觉生物反馈（VB），而14项选择听觉生物反馈（AB）。荟萃分析显示，在干预后和长期训练后，加载变量均减少。视觉和听觉反馈。值得注意的是,训练后负荷变量的减少更为明显，VB被证明比AB更有效。实时生物反馈干预在降低与RRI相关的负载变量方面是有效的。持续训练的影响更大，VB在有效性方面优于AB。
