Behavioral Symptoms

行为症状
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:奥氮平和利培酮已成为治疗痴呆行为障碍的短期处方中使用最广泛的药物。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究奥氮平和利培酮治疗痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)的有效性和安全性。旨在为临床医生和护理人员提供最新建议。
    方法:纳入前瞻性对照临床研究,提取了其中的可用数据。BEHAVE-AD成绩随成绩变化的结果,特定的行为变量,以及安全性信号被汇总以进行赔率率和加权平均差的分析,分别。
    方法:Medline,Embase,科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和万方。
    方法:前瞻性,对照临床研究,进行比较奥氮平和利培酮治疗BPSD的有效性和安全性。
    方法:纳入研究的相关数据包括基线特征和必要结果由2名研究者独立提取。本研究采用BEHAVE-AD量表评估疗效。在治疗开始时评估所有行为,以及完成药物课程。不良事件采用治疗主要症状量表进行评估。或不良反应术语词典的编码符号。加权平均差异用于合并分析。
    结果:本荟萃分析共纳入2427名参与者。应答率的比较OR,奥氮平和利培酮之间的显着反应率为0.65(95%CI:0.51-0.84;P=.0008),和0.62(95%CI:0.50-0.78;P<0.0001),分别。奥氮平对包括妄想在内的变量的改善有统计学差异(WMD,-1.83,95%CI,-3.20,-0.47),和夜间行为干扰(大规模杀伤性武器,-1.99,95%CI,-3.60,-0.38)与利培酮相比。
    结论:我们的结果表明,奥氮平在降低阿尔茨海默病的BPSD方面可能在统计学上优于利培酮,尤其是在缓解妄想和夜间行为障碍方面。此外,奥氮平在统计学上显示出更低的躁动风险,睡眠障碍,和锥体外系的迹象。
    OBJECTIVE: Olanzapine and risperidone have emerged as the most widely used drugs as short-term prescription in the treatment of behavioral disturbances in dementia. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was hence performed to investigate the effectiveness and safety profile of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), aiming to provide updated suggestion for clinical physicians and caregivers.
    METHODS: Prospective controlled clinical studies were included, of which available data was extracted. Outcomes of BEHAVE-AD scores with the variation of grades, specific behaviors variables, as well as safety signals were pooled for the analysis by odds rates and weighted mean differences, respectively.
    METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang.
    METHODS: Prospective, controlled clinical studies, conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety profile of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of BPSD.
    METHODS: Interested data including baseline characteristics and necessary outcomes from the included studies were extracted independently by 2 investigators. BEHAVE-AD scale was adopted to assess the efficacy in the present study. All behaviors were evaluated at the time of the initiation of the treatment, as well as the completion of drugs courses. Adverse events were assessed with the criteria of Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale, or Coding Symbols for a Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms dictionary. Weighted mean difference was used for the pooled analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 2427 participants were included in the present meta-analysis. Comparative OR on response rate, and remarkable response rate between olanzapine and risperidone was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.51-0.84; P = .0008), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.50-0.78; P < .0001), respectively. There were statistical differences observed by olanzapine on the improvement of variables including delusions (WMD, -1.83, 95% CI, -3.20, -0.47), and nighttime behavior disturbances (WMD, -1.99, 95% CI, -3.60, -0.38) when compared to risperidone.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that olanzapine might be statistically superior to risperidone on the reduction of BPSD of Alzheimer\'s disease, especially in the relief of delusions and nighttime behavior disturbances. In addition, olanzapine was shown statistically lower risks of agitation, sleep disturbance, and extrapyramidal signs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:综合现有痴呆护理临床指南中关于评估和管理痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)的建议,以学习和适应加拿大描述BPSD的背景和语言。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:关于痴呆症护理的中度至高质量临床实践指南,对BPSD评估或管理提出了1项或多项建议。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,JBIEBM,PsycINFO,AgeLine,和灰色文献关于痴呆症护理的临床指南,对BPSD提出建议,在2011年1月1日至2022年10月13日之间发布。两名独立的审查员进行了研究筛选和数据抽象。四名独立审查员使用研究与评估指南(AGREE)II工具完成了质量评估;包括的指南的平均总体AGREEII评分≥4。
    结果:我们的系统评价确定了23个中、高质量指南(264个建议)。AGREEII工具的平均总体质量评分为4至6.5。建议被清楚地呈现(呈现分数的平均清晰度为73.5%),但指南适用性未得到一致解决(平均适用性得分为39.3%).BPSD是描述神经精神症状的最普遍的术语(指南数量[n]=14)。有生活经验的人贡献了6个指南(26.1%)。十项指南(43.5%)描述了一种或多种健康公平考虑因素。指南提出了评估和管理躁动的建议(n=12),侵略(n=10),精神病(n=11),抑郁症(n=9),焦虑(n=5),冷漠(n=6),不适当的性行为(n=3),夜间行为(n=5),和进食障碍(n=3)。建议声明存在很大差异,分配给每个陈述的证据质量,和建议的强度。
    结论:有几个中到高质量的指南对BPSD评估和管理提出了建议,但是不同指南的推荐声明的差异性以及对指南适用性的考虑不足可能会阻碍指南在临床实践中的传播和实施.
    OBJECTIVE: To synthesize recommendations on assessing and managing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSDs) in existing clinical practice guidelines on dementia care to learn from and adapt recommendations to a Canadian context and language for describing BPSDs.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: Moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines on dementia care that made 1 or more recommendations on BPSD assessment or management.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, JBI EBM, PsycINFO, AgeLine, and gray literature for clinical practice guidelines on dementia care making recommendations on BPSD, published between January 1, 2011, and October 13, 2022. Two independent reviewers conducted study screening and data abstraction. Four independent reviewers completed quality appraisal using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool; included guidelines had a mean overall AGREE II score ≥4.
    RESULTS: Our systematic review identified 23 moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines (264 recommendations). The mean overall quality score on the AGREE II tool ranged from 4 to 6.5. Recommendations were clearly presented (mean clarity of presentation score 73.5%), but guideline applicability was not consistently addressed (mean applicability score 39.3%). BPSD was the most prevalent term describing neuropsychiatric symptoms (number of guidelines [n] = 14). People with lived experience contributed to 6 guidelines (26.1%). Ten guidelines (43.5%) described 1 or more health equity considerations. Guidelines made recommendations for assessing and managing agitation (n = 12), aggression (n = 10), psychosis (n = 11), depression (n = 9), anxiety (n = 5), apathy (n = 6), inappropriate sexual behavior (n = 3), nighttime behavior (n = 5), and eating disturbances (n = 3). There was substantial variability in recommendation statements, evidence quality assigned to each statement, and strength of recommendations.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are several moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines making recommendations on BPSD assessment and management, but variability in recommendation statements across guidelines and insufficient consideration of guideline applicability may hamper guideline dissemination and implementation in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:运动神经元病(MND)是一种神经退行性疾病,逐步影响功能和自我感知的生活质量(QoL)。高达50%的MND患者会出现认知和行为障碍,与相关的增加照顾者的负担或紧张。然而,对于MND中QoL与认知或行为障碍之间的关系尚未有系统的研究.目的是确定在MND中QoL与认知/行为障碍之间是否存在关系,同时补充寻找确定这些研究中使用的认知/行为和QoL测量的类型。
    方法:在多个数据库中进行了系统搜索(PsychINFO,Embase,Medline,AMED)为截至2023年2月22日发表的研究。利用定量方法测量QoL的研究,包括认知/行为功能/损害.提取并综合了检查QoL-认知/行为损害之间关系的结果。
    结果:共确定了488项研究,14项研究纳入系统评价。所有14项研究均为观察性研究(11项横断面研究,3纵向)。13项研究使用了MND非特异性措施,特别是与QoL和认知障碍有关。在8项测量行为障碍的研究中,62.5%(N=5)发现QoL差异或相关性较低。在测量认知障碍的12项研究中,只有33.3%(N=4)发现较低的QoL差异或相关性。
    结论:本系统评价显示行为损害可能对MND患者的生活质量有影响。用于测量QoL和认知/行为损害的评估类型存在差异,其中大多数是非特异性疾病。未来研究的建议是使用全面的疾病特异性,多领域措施,以进一步阐明QoL-认知/行为损害关系。
    OBJECTIVE: Motor neuron disease (MND) is a neurodegenerative disease, progressively impacting function and self-perceived quality of life (QoL). Up to 50% of people with MND can present with cognitive and behavioural impairment, with an associated increase in caregiver burden or strain. However, there has been no systematic exploration of the relationship between QoL and cognitive or behavioural impairment in MND. The aim was to determine if there is a relationship between QoL and cognitive/behavioural impairment in MND, while also supplementarily looking to determine the types of cognitive/behavioural and QoL measures utilised in these studies.
    METHODS: A systematic search was performed across multiple databases (PsychINFO, Embase, Medline, AMED) for research published up to the date of February 22, 2023. Studies utilising quantitative methods of measuring QoL, cognitive/behavioural functioning/impairment were included. Findings examining relationships between QoL-cognitive/behavioural impairment were extracted and synthesised.
    RESULTS: A total of 488 studies were identified, with 14 studies included in the systematic review. All 14 studies were observational (11 cross-sectional, 3 longitudinal). 13 studies utilised MND non-specific measures, particularly in relation to QoL and cognitive impairment. Of 8 studies measuring behavioural impairment 62.5% (N = 5) found either a lower QoL difference or association. Only 33.3% (N = 4) of 12 studies measuring cognitive impairment found a lower QoL difference or association.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that behavioural impairment may have an impact on QoL in MND. There is variability in types of assessments used to measure QoL and also cognitive/behavioural impairment, most of which are disease-non-specific. Recommendations for future research are to use comprehensive disease-specific, multidomain measures to further elucidate the QoL-cognitive/behavioural impairment relationship.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    使用数字技术作为提供健康行为改变(HBC)干预措施的方法在普通人群中迅速增加。然而,在严重精神疾病(SMI)中的作用仍然被忽视。在这项研究中,我们旨在系统地识别和评估SMI患者中有关数字HBC干预的所有现有证据.对在线电子数据库进行了系统搜索。遵守情况数据,可行性,并提取了SMI中数字HBC干预研究的结果。我们的联合搜索确定了2196个标题和摘要,其中1934年在删除重复项后仍然存在。对107篇文章进行了全文筛选,留下36项研究。从这些,14专注于身体活动和/或心脏代谢健康,19专注于戒烟,还有三个人关注其他健康行为。在不同的研究中,测量的结果差异很大。尽管超过90%的测量行为变化的研究报告了行为/态度的积极变化,收集心理健康数据的研究太少,无法确定对精神病结局的影响.数字HBC干预对SMI患者来说是可以接受的,并且可以为解决这些人群的行为健康提供有希望的选择。反馈表明,额外的人类支持可能有助于促进坚持/参与,而这些干预措施的内容可能会受益于更多针对具体需求的调整。虽然文献还没有关于心理健康功效的结论,到目前为止,现有的证据确实支持了它们在各个领域改变行为的潜力。
    The use of digital technologies as a method of delivering health behaviour change (HBC) interventions is rapidly increasing across the general population. However, the role in severe mental illness (SMI) remains overlooked. In this study, we aimed to systematically identify and evaluate all of the existing evidence around digital HBC interventions in people with an SMI. A systematic search of online electronic databases was conducted. Data on adherence, feasibility, and outcomes of studies on digital HBC interventions in SMI were extracted. Our combined search identified 2196 titles and abstracts, of which 1934 remained after removing duplicates. Full-text screening was performed for 107 articles, leaving 36 studies to be included. From these, 14 focused on physical activity and/or cardio-metabolic health, 19 focused on smoking cessation, and three concerned other health behaviours. The outcomes measured varied considerably across studies. Although over 90% of studies measuring behavioural changes reported positive changes in behaviour/attitudes, there were too few studies collecting data on mental health to determine effects on psychiatric outcomes. Digital HBC interventions are acceptable to people with an SMI, and could present a promising option for addressing behavioural health in these populations. Feedback indicated that additional human support may be useful for promoting adherence/engagement, and the content of such interventions may benefit from more tailoring to specific needs. While the literature does not yet allow for conclusions regarding efficacy for mental health, the available evidence to date does support their potential to change behaviour across various domains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:促炎细胞因子在慢性炎症和疼痛中起关键作用,并有助于行为症状(抑郁症状,焦虑,疲劳,睡眠障碍)和合并症(糖尿病,心脏病,cancer).缺乏与这些行为症状/合并症与轴向下腰痛(aLBP)相关的特定促炎细胞因子的证据。本综述旨在对以下方面进行系统的分析:(1)成人与aLBP相关的特异性促炎细胞因子,(2)aLBP中促炎细胞因子与行为症状之间的关系,(3)aLBP中促炎细胞因子与合并症的关系,为aLBP患者的未来诊断和干预目标开发新的临床框架。
    方法:电子数据库,包括PubMed/MEDLINE,ProQuest护理和相关健康来源,在2012年1月至2023年2月期间搜索了和CINAHLComplete(EBSCO)。符合条件的研究包括横断面,病例控制,纵向,以及队列研究,其中在18岁以上的aLBP成人中报道了促炎细胞因子。干预研究和随机对照试验被排除在外。JoannaBriggs研究所(JBI)标准用于质量评估。
    结果:来自11项研究的结果显示,成人aLBP患者中3种与疼痛强度相关的促炎细胞因子:C反应蛋白(CRP),肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α),和白细胞介素(IL-6)。一些研究评估了促炎细胞因子与抑郁症状之间的关联;没有一项研究探讨了促炎细胞因子与疲劳的关联。焦虑,睡眠障碍,或合并症(糖尿病,心脏病,和癌症)在ALBP中。
    结论:aLBP中的促炎细胞因子可以作为疼痛的复合生物标志物,相关症状,和合并症,并可能作为未来干预的目标。需要精心设计的研究来评估慢性炎症之间的关联,行为症状,和合并症。
    Proinflammatory cytokines play a critical role in chronic inflammation and pain and contribute to behavioral symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance) and comorbidities (diabetes, cardiac diseases, cancer). Evidence is lacking on the specific proinflammatory cytokines associated with these behavioral symptoms/comorbidities co-occurring with axial low back pain (aLBP). This review aimed to systematically analyze the following: (1) specific proinflammatory cytokines associated with aLBP in adults, (2) associations among proinflammatory cytokines and behavioral symptoms in aLBP, and (3) relationships among proinflammatory cytokines and comorbidities in aLBP, to develop a new clinical framework for future diagnostic and intervention targets for patients with aLBP.
    Electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source, and CINAHL Complete (EBSCO) were searched for the period January 2012 to February 2023. Eligible studies included cross-sectional, case-control, longitudinal, and cohort studies in which proinflammatory cytokines were reported in adults above 18 years with aLBP. Intervention studies and randomized controlled trails were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria were used for quality evaluation.
    Findings from 11 studies showed 3 proinflammatory cytokines associated with pain intensity in adult patients with aLBP: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α), and Interleukin (IL-6). Some studies assessed associations between proinflammatory cytokines and depressive symptoms; none explored the association of proinflammatory cytokines with fatigue, anxiety, sleep disturbance, or comorbidities (diabetes, cardiac diseases, and cancer) in aLBP.
    Proinflammatory cytokines in aLBP can serve as composite biomarkers for pain, associated symptoms, and comorbidities and may serve as a target for future interventions. There is need for well-designed studies assessing associations among chronic inflammation, behavioral symptoms, and comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:疗养院(NH)工作人员提到患有神经认知障碍(NCD)的居民对痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)的管理知识不足。因此,工作人员培训似乎是必要的,然而,关于最佳培训实践及其结果的现有证据仍然分散。本系统综述旨在:1)确定NHsBPSD管理员工培训干预措施的最佳临床实践和理论基础,和2)总结这些干预措施对居民和工作人员结果的影响。
    方法:进行混合方法系统评价。两名护士研究人员独立搜索了九个电子数据库,以确定针对NHsBPSD管理的员工培训干预措施的有效性研究,关于各种居民和工作人员的结果。该搜索是针对1996年至2022年之间发表的文章进行的,使用选定的关键字,MeSH术语,和预定义的资格标准。使用JBI检查表评估检索到的研究的方法学质量。
    结果:总体而言,包括47篇文章中的39项研究。确定了十类培训,其中三个对居民和工作人员都表现出最有希望的结果:1)结构化的协议和模型,2)以人为中心的沐浴,3)通信技术。检索到的研究的方法学质量普遍较弱。还注意到干预可行性和可重复性的问题。
    结论:结合结构化协议和模型的培训干预措施,以人为中心的沐浴和沟通技术与更好的员工和居民结果相关。然而,迫切需要高质量的研究来加强现有的证据,确保可行性和可重复性。
    Nursing home (NH) staff mention knowledge deficits regarding the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSDs) in residents with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs). Staff training therefore appears to be necessary. However, existing evidence on best training practices and their outcomes remains scattered. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify the best clinical practices and theoretical bases of staff training interventions on BPSD management in NHs and (2) summarize the effects of these interventions on resident and staff outcomes.
    A mixed methods systematic review was conducted. Two nurse researchers independently searched nine electronic databases to identify studies on the efficacy of staff training interventions aimed at BPSD management in NHs, on a variety of resident and staff outcomes. The search was conducted for articles published between 1996 and 2022, using selected keywords, MeSH terms, and predefined eligibility criteria. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was assessed using JBI checklists.
    Overall, 39 studies in 47 articles were included. Ten categories of trainings were identified, of which three demonstrated the most promising results on both residents and staff: (1) structured protocols and models, (2) person-centred bathing, and (3) communication techniques. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was generally weak. Issues with intervention feasibility and reproducibility were also noted.
    Training interventions incorporating structured protocols and models, person-centred bathing, and communication techniques are associated with better staff and resident outcomes. However, there is a strong need for high-quality research to strengthen existing evidence and ensure feasibility and reproducibility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Many studies have explored the efficacy of probiotics on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children, but there is no consensus on the curative effect. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively investigate whether probiotics could improve behavioral symptoms in children with ASD. A systematic database search was conducted and a total of seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found a nonsignificant overall effect size of probiotics on behavioral symptoms in children with ASD (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.60 to 0.11, p = 0.18). However, a significant overall effect size was found in the subgroup of the probiotic blend (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.02, p = 0.04). Additionally, these studies provided limited evidence for the efficacy of probiotics due to their small sample sizes, a shorter intervention duration, different probiotics used, different scales used, and poor research quality. Thus, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled studies following strict trial guidelines are needed to precisely demonstrate the therapeutic effects of probiotics on ASD in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:有各种非药物干预措施用于痴呆护理。然而,医疗保健提供者在确定最适合痴呆症行为和心理症状(BPSD)的干预措施方面继续面临挑战,因个人而异。本综述旨在确定和总结每个亚症状的有效非药物干预措施,以提供个性化的,临床实践的循证建议。
    方法:本综述遵循Cochrane总综述方法的指导原则。它只关注有或没有随机对照试验荟萃分析的系统评价(SRs)。五个电子数据库:PubMed,护理和相关健康文献的累积指数,Embase,PsycINFO和Cochrane数据库,将被搜索。筛选的SR将通过PICO制剂确定是否有资格:(人群)患有任何类型的痴呆症的老年人;(干预)所有类型的非药物干预;(比较)常规护理或其他非药物干预;(结果)BPSD及其亚症状。个人SR的质量将使用评估系统评价2的测量工具进行评估。还将通过消除由具有相同兴趣的同一作者进行的旧SR并计算校正的覆盖面积来考虑主要研究的重叠。将根据预先确定的公式提取数据,这将根据BPSD的亚症状而不是根据干预类型组织非药物干预。
    背景:由于这是一篇综述论文,不需要道德批准。这项审查的结果将通过发表在同行评审的期刊上进行传播。
    UNASSIGNED:CRD42022340930。
    There are various non-pharmacological interventions for dementia care. However, healthcare providers continue to face challenges in determining the most suitable interventions for the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which vary according to individuals. This umbrella review aims to identify and summarise the effective non-pharmacological interventions for each sub-symptom to provide individualised, evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.
    This review follows the guideline of the Cochrane methodology for umbrella reviews. It focuses only on systematic reviews (SRs) with or without a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Five electronic databases: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Database, will be searched. The screened SRs will be determined for eligibility by the PICO formulation: (Population) older adults with dementia of any type; (Intervention) all types of non-pharmacological intervention; (Comparison) usual care or other non-pharmacological intervention; and (Outcome) BPSD and its sub-symptoms. The quality of the individual SRs will be appraised using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. The overlap of primary studies will also be considered by eliminating an old-date SR conducted by the same authors with the same interest and calculating the Corrected Covered Area. Data will be extracted according to the pre-determined formula, which will organise non-pharmacological interventions according to the sub-symptoms of BPSD and not according to the type of intervention.
    Since this is a review paper, ethical approval is not required. The findings of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
    CRD42022340930.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    持续的身体症状(PPS)仍然是医疗保健系统中的一个挑战,主要是由于时间有限的协商,不确定性和有限的专业护理能力。自助干预可能是扩大治疗机会的一种具有成本效益的方式。为未来的干预奠定基础,我们旨在描述干预成分及其在PPS自助干预中的潜在作用.在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,EMBASE,PsycINFO和CENTRAL。纳入51项随机对照试验。干预措施对与症状负担相关的结局(标准化平均差≥0.2)的影响进行编码,焦虑,抑郁症,生活质量,医疗保健利用和疾病缺席。行为改变技术(BCT)分类法v1用于编码干预组件。计算结果类别中每个BCT的潜力指数,根据对二项随机变量的双侧检验,每个BCT被评估为“潜在有效”或“无效”。16个BCT显示出作为治疗成分的潜在作用。这些BCT代表了主题:目标和计划,反馈和监控,塑造知识,自然后果,行为比较,协会,重复和替换,regulation,先例和身份。结果表明,新的PPS自助干预措施应包括特定的BCT,以改善患者的身心健康。
    Persistent physical symptoms (PPS) remain a challenge in the healthcare system due to time-constrained consultations, uncertainty and limited specialised care capacity. Self-help interventions may be a cost-effective way to widen the access to treatment. As a foundation for future interventions, we aimed to describe intervention components and their potential effects in self-help interventions for PPS. A systematic literature search was made in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL. Fifty-one randomised controlled trials were included. Interventions were coded for effect on outcomes (standardised mean difference ≥0.2) related to symptom burden, anxiety, depression, quality of life, healthcare utilisation and sickness absence. The Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy v1 was used to code intervention components. An index of potential was calculated for each BCT within an outcome category. Each BCT was assessed as \'potentially effective\' or \'not effective\' based on a two-sided test for binomial random variables. Sixteen BCTs showed potential effect as treatment components. These BCTs represented the themes: goals and planning, feedback and monitoring, shaping knowledge, natural consequences, comparison of behaviour, associations, repetition and substitution, regulation, antecedents and identity. The results suggest that specific BCTs should be included in new PPS self-help interventions aiming to improve the patients\' physical and mental health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抑郁症的现有治疗方法疗效有限,缓解率不理想。本研究旨在回顾研究谷氨酸受体调节剂在治疗难治性抑郁症患者中的作用的随机对照试验(RCTs)。方法:研究方案在PROSPERO(CRD42021225516)中注册。Scopus,ISIWebofScience,Embase,科克伦图书馆,谷歌学者,截至2020年9月,我们搜索了3个试验登记处,以寻找评估谷氨酸受体调节剂对难治性抑郁症的RCT.干预组和对照组在抑郁评分从基线到终点变化方面的差异被认为是主要结果。用于随机试验的Cochrane偏倚风险工具的第2版用于评估随机对照试验的质量。没有收到资金。结果:纳入38个RCT。根据纳入的研究,发现了氯胺酮的令人信服的证据(有或没有电惊厥治疗,静脉注射或其他形式),一氧化二氮,金刚烷胺,和rislenemdaz(MK-0657);MK-0657、金刚烷胺的结果,和一氧化二氮仅基于一项研究。锂,lanicemine,D-环丝氨酸,脱胶剂的疗效好坏参半,and,利鲁唑,和7-氯代尿酸与安慰剂大部分相当。针对氯胺酮以外的药物的研究数量有限。结论:由于RCT之间的高度异质性,该研究无法确定药物与安慰剂之间的统计学和临床意义之间的差异。然而,氯胺酮可作为TRD的有效药物;需要额外的研究来确定最佳剂量,疗效持续时间,和间隔。还建议进一步研究除氯胺酮以外的谷氨酸能系统调节剂对治疗抗性抑郁症的有效性。
    Objective: Available treatments of depression have limited efficacy and unsatisfactory remission rates. This study aims to review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating effects of glutamate receptor modulators in treating patients with resistant depression. Method : The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021225516). Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and three trial registries were searched up to September 2020 to find RCTs evaluating glutamate receptor modulators for resistant depression. The difference between intervention and control groups in changing depression scores from baseline to endpoint was considered the primary outcome. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess the quality of the RCTs. No funding was received. Results: Thirty-eight RCTs were included. Based on the included studies, compelling evidence was found for ketamine (with or without electroconvulsive therapy, intravenous or other forms), nitrous oxide, amantadine, and rislenemdaz (MK-0657); the results for MK-0657, amantadine, and nitrous oxide were only based on one study for each. Lithium, lanicemine, D-cycloserine, and decoglurant showed mixed results for efficacy, and, riluzole, and 7-chlorokynurenic acid were mostly comparable to placebo. A limited number of studies were available that addressed drugs other than ketamine. Conclusion: The study cannot determine the difference between statistical and clinical significance between the agents and placebo due to high heterogeneity among the RCTs. Nevertheless, ketamine could be used as an efficacious drug in TRD; still, additional studies are needed to delineate the optimum dosage, duration of efficacy, and intervals. Further studies are also recommended on the effectiveness of glutamatergic system modulators other than ketamine on treatment-resistant depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号