Behavioral Symptoms

行为症状
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了探索照顾者对运动神经元病(MND)行为症状的体验,在使用MiNDToolkit之前和之后,一种新的基于互联网的心理教育干预,以支持MND中行为症状的管理(BehSymp)。该研究还调查了护理人员对MiNDToolkit的看法和可接受性。
    方法:对护理人员参与的定性过程评估,和可接受性,MiNDToolkit使用对护理人员的半结构化访谈进行(n=11)。所有采访都是录音,专业逐字转录并进行主题分析。
    结果:确定了五个主题:(1)在黑暗中:护理人员\'对BehSymp的经历和反应;(2)其他人可以看到:HCP在识别症状中的作用-以及护理人员获得支持的感知机会;(3)发光:护理人员实施和对MiNDkit内容的感知影响;(4)可接受和护理人员\'Toolkit的参与5。当症状明显脱离背景时,照顾者对BehSymp的经历尤其令人痛苦。MiNDToolkit似乎支持了解BehSymp是MND的一部分。内容引起了护理人员的共鸣,他报告了解了MND的全貌,这导致了对新学的策略的接受和使用。与平台的互动很好,来自HCP的不同输入。HCP的更大和细致入微的参与对于支持BehSymp的管理似乎很重要。出现了全面试验的建议,包括添加纸质小册子,以配合干预和创建有关情绪不稳定的新模块,关系的变化,过渡到养老院。
    结论:MiNDToolkit总体上对护理人员是可接受的。建议的改进应在全面试验中采取行动。
    BACKGROUND: To explore carers\' experiences of behavioural symptoms in Motor Neurone Disease (MND), before and after using the MiNDToolkit, a novel internet-based psychoeducational intervention to support management of behavioural symptoms (BehSymp) in MND. The study also investigated carers\' views and acceptability of MiNDToolkit.
    METHODS: A qualitative process evaluation of carers engagement with, and acceptability of, the MiNDToolkit conducted using semi-structured interviews with carers (n = 11). All interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.
    RESULTS: Five themes were identified: (1) In the dark: carers\' experiences and reactions to BehSymp; (2) Others can see: the role of HCPs in identifying symptoms - and perceived opportunities for carers to receive support; (3) Shedding light: carers implementation and perceived impact of the MiNDToolkit content; (4) Acceptability and carers\' engagement with MiNDToolkit; (5) Future implementation. Carers\' experience of BehSymp was particularly distressing when symptoms were apparently out of context. MiNDToolkit appeared to support learning that BehSymp were part of MND. Content resonated with carers, who reported learning about the full picture of MND, which led to acceptance and use of newly learned strategies. Engagement with the platform was good, with varied input from HCPs. Greater and nuanced involvement from HCPs seem important to support management of BehSymp. Recommendations for a full-scale trial emerged, including adding a paper booklet to accompany the intervention and creation of new modules on emotional lability, changes in relationships, and transitioning to a care home.
    CONCLUSIONS: MiNDToolkit was acceptable to carers overall. Recommended improvements should be actioned in a full-scale trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:奥氮平和利培酮已成为治疗痴呆行为障碍的短期处方中使用最广泛的药物。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究奥氮平和利培酮治疗痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)的有效性和安全性。旨在为临床医生和护理人员提供最新建议。
    方法:纳入前瞻性对照临床研究,提取了其中的可用数据。BEHAVE-AD成绩随成绩变化的结果,特定的行为变量,以及安全性信号被汇总以进行赔率率和加权平均差的分析,分别。
    方法:Medline,Embase,科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和万方。
    方法:前瞻性,对照临床研究,进行比较奥氮平和利培酮治疗BPSD的有效性和安全性。
    方法:纳入研究的相关数据包括基线特征和必要结果由2名研究者独立提取。本研究采用BEHAVE-AD量表评估疗效。在治疗开始时评估所有行为,以及完成药物课程。不良事件采用治疗主要症状量表进行评估。或不良反应术语词典的编码符号。加权平均差异用于合并分析。
    结果:本荟萃分析共纳入2427名参与者。应答率的比较OR,奥氮平和利培酮之间的显着反应率为0.65(95%CI:0.51-0.84;P=.0008),和0.62(95%CI:0.50-0.78;P<0.0001),分别。奥氮平对包括妄想在内的变量的改善有统计学差异(WMD,-1.83,95%CI,-3.20,-0.47),和夜间行为干扰(大规模杀伤性武器,-1.99,95%CI,-3.60,-0.38)与利培酮相比。
    结论:我们的结果表明,奥氮平在降低阿尔茨海默病的BPSD方面可能在统计学上优于利培酮,尤其是在缓解妄想和夜间行为障碍方面。此外,奥氮平在统计学上显示出更低的躁动风险,睡眠障碍,和锥体外系的迹象。
    OBJECTIVE: Olanzapine and risperidone have emerged as the most widely used drugs as short-term prescription in the treatment of behavioral disturbances in dementia. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was hence performed to investigate the effectiveness and safety profile of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), aiming to provide updated suggestion for clinical physicians and caregivers.
    METHODS: Prospective controlled clinical studies were included, of which available data was extracted. Outcomes of BEHAVE-AD scores with the variation of grades, specific behaviors variables, as well as safety signals were pooled for the analysis by odds rates and weighted mean differences, respectively.
    METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang.
    METHODS: Prospective, controlled clinical studies, conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety profile of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of BPSD.
    METHODS: Interested data including baseline characteristics and necessary outcomes from the included studies were extracted independently by 2 investigators. BEHAVE-AD scale was adopted to assess the efficacy in the present study. All behaviors were evaluated at the time of the initiation of the treatment, as well as the completion of drugs courses. Adverse events were assessed with the criteria of Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale, or Coding Symbols for a Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms dictionary. Weighted mean difference was used for the pooled analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 2427 participants were included in the present meta-analysis. Comparative OR on response rate, and remarkable response rate between olanzapine and risperidone was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.51-0.84; P = .0008), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.50-0.78; P < .0001), respectively. There were statistical differences observed by olanzapine on the improvement of variables including delusions (WMD, -1.83, 95% CI, -3.20, -0.47), and nighttime behavior disturbances (WMD, -1.99, 95% CI, -3.60, -0.38) when compared to risperidone.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that olanzapine might be statistically superior to risperidone on the reduction of BPSD of Alzheimer\'s disease, especially in the relief of delusions and nighttime behavior disturbances. In addition, olanzapine was shown statistically lower risks of agitation, sleep disturbance, and extrapyramidal signs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:住院单位已经使用了七种痴呆症行为和心理症状(BPSD)模型。每一层的分类是广泛定义的,并不总是由临床医生同意。该案例研究通过将BPSD分类标准与临床表现相结合,使用新颖的方法来识别病例的临床特征,并将这些特征与BPSD分类进行匹配。通过使用特定于病例的措施,例如神经精神量表(NPI)和CohenMansfield躁动量表(CMAI)量表和关键临床数据,可以增强此过程。
    方法:以76岁男性为研究对象,诊断为阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆混合性痴呆。症状的临床表现被认为是极端的,从而符合BPSD服务交付模式的第七层(Extreme)。鉴于高攻击性,此案被认为属于极端BPSD类别,这一直反映在NPI和CMAI的高分中,以及住院时间长(超过3年)。平均每月服用Prorenata(PRN)精神药物56次,每月隔离发作6次,每次发作平均持续132分钟显示行为的严重性。他的侵略程度导致了环境破坏和员工受伤。
    结论:我们推荐患者的临床特征,应使用相关医院数据和具体措施,围绕将病例定义和分类为极端BPSD达成共识。
    BACKGROUND: The seven tiered behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) model of service delivery has been used by inpatient units. The classification of each tier is broadly defined and not always agreed upon by clinicians. The case study uses novel approach by combining the BPSD classification criteria with clinical presentation to identify the clinical characteristics of the case and match these characteristics against the BPSD classification. This process was enhanced by using case specific measures such as the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) scales and key clinical data.
    METHODS: A case study of 76 year old male diagnosed with mixed Alzheimer\'s and Vascular dementia. The clinical presentation of the symptomatology was deemed to be extreme, thus fitting into the seventh tier (Extreme) of the BPSD model of service delivery. The case is considered to fit into the Extreme BPSD category given the high levels of aggression, which were consistently reflected in high scores on NPI and CMAI, as well as long length of inpatient stay (over 3 years). The average number of Pro re nata (PRN) psychotropics medications per month was 56 and seclusion episodes of 6 times per month, with each episode lasting on average 132 min shows severity of behaviours. His level of aggression had resulted in environmental damage and staff injuries.
    CONCLUSIONS: We recommend patient clinical characteristics, relevant hospital data and specific measures should be used to develop consensus around defining and classifying cases into Extreme BPSD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:酒精戒断综合征(AWS)是一种与酒精使用障碍(AUD)相关的复杂疾病,其特征在于患者之间症状严重程度的显著差异。伴随AWS的心理和情绪症状显着导致戒断痛苦和复发风险。尽管神经适应过程在AWS中很重要,已经进行了有限的遗传调查。这项研究主要集中在探索ANK3和ZNF804A基因中的单核苷酸多态性对AWS中表现的焦虑和攻击严重程度的单一和相互作用影响。通过检查与戒断相关的精神病理学的遗传关联,我们的最终目标是进一步了解调节AWS严重性的遗传基础。
    方法:该研究涉及449名被诊断患有酒精使用障碍的男性患者。使用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和Buss-Perry攻击问卷(BPAQ)评估与AWS相关的情绪和行为症状。从外周血中提取基因组DNA,并使用PCR进行基因分型。
    结果:单基因分析显示,ANK3rs10994336中天然存在的等位基因变体(CC纯合与T等位基因携带者)与AWS相关的情绪和行为症状相关。此外,ANK3和ZNF804A之间的相互作用与AWS相关的精神症状的严重程度显着相关,如MANOVA所示。双向方差分析进一步证明了ANK3rs10994336和ZNF804Ars7597593对焦虑的显著交互作用,身体上的侵略,言语攻击,愤怒,和敌意。分层回归分析证实了这些发现。此外,简单效应分析和多重比较表明,ANK3rs10994336T等位基因的携带者经历了更严重的AWS,而ZNF804Ars7597593T等位基因似乎对与ANK3rs10994336突变相关的风险提供保护。
    结论:这项研究强调了ANK3和ZNF804A之间的基因-基因相互作用,这在调节与AWS相关的情绪和行为症状中起着至关重要的作用。ANK3rs10994336T等位基因被鉴定为风险等位基因,而ZNF804Ars7597593T等位基因提供对与ANK3rs10994336突变相关风险的保护。这些发现为基因-基因相互作用提供了初步支持,作为精神病风险的解释,为AWS涉及的病理生理机制提供有价值的见解。
    OBJECTIVE: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a complex condition associated with alcohol use disorder (AUD), characterized by significant variations in symptom severity among patients. The psychological and emotional symptoms accompanying AWS significantly contribute to withdrawal distress and relapse risk. Despite the importance of neural adaptation processes in AWS, limited genetic investigations have been conducted. This study primarily focuses on exploring the single and interaction effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the ANK3 and ZNF804A genes on anxiety and aggression severity manifested in AWS. By examining genetic associations with withdrawal-related psychopathology, we ultimately aim to advance understanding the genetic underpinnings that modulate AWS severity.
    METHODS: The study involved 449 male patients diagnosed with alcohol use disorder. The Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) were used to assess emotional and behavioral symptoms related to AWS. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood, and genotyping was performed using PCR.
    RESULTS: Single-gene analysis revealed that naturally occurring allelic variants in ANK3 rs10994336 (CC homozygous vs. T allele carriers) were associated with mood and behavioral symptoms related to AWS. Furthermore, the interaction between ANK3 and ZNF804A was significantly associated with the severity of psychiatric symptoms related to AWS, as indicated by MANOVA. Two-way ANOVA further demonstrated a significant interaction effect between ANK3 rs10994336 and ZNF804A rs7597593 on anxiety, physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. Hierarchical regression analyses confirmed these findings. Additionally, simple effects analysis and multiple comparisons revealed that carriers of the ANK3 rs10994336 T allele experienced more severe AWS, while the ZNF804A rs7597593 T allele appeared to provide protection against the risk associated with the ANK3 rs10994336 mutation.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the gene-gene interaction between ANK3 and ZNF804A, which plays a crucial role in modulating emotional and behavioral symptoms related to AWS. The ANK3 rs10994336 T allele is identified as a risk allele, while the ZNF804A rs7597593 T allele offers protection against the risk associated with the ANK3 rs10994336 mutation. These findings provide initial support for gene-gene interactions as an explanation for psychiatric risk, offering valuable insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in AWS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)一词涵盖了一组在现象学和医学上不同的症状,很少单独发生。他们的治疗代表了不同类型痴呆症的主要未满足的医疗需求,包括老年痴呆症.了解症状发生及其聚类可以为临床药物开发和使用现有和未来的BPSD治疗提供信息。
    本研究的主要目的是调查通过神经精神量表(NPI)评估的常用主成分分析识别BPSD模式的能力。
    来自老龄化的NPI分数,人口统计,和记忆研究(ADAMS)用于表征报告的单个症状及其组合的发生。根据这些信息,我们设计并进行了一项模拟实验,以比较主成分分析(PCA)和零膨胀PCA(ZIPCA)揭示真实症状关联的能力。
    对ADAMS数据库的探索性分析显示NPI症状评分的多变量分布重叠。仿真实验表明,PCA和ZIPCA无法处理具有多个重叠模式的数据。尽管主成分分析方法通常应用于NPI分数,提示BPSD聚类是一种统计现象,而不是临床实践中出现的症状关联,存在风险.
    我们建议在对任何数据集进行主成分分析之前对多变量分布进行彻底表征。
    UNASSIGNED: The term Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) covers a group of phenomenologically and medically distinct symptoms that rarely occur in isolation. Their therapy represents a major unmet medical need across dementias of different types, including Alzheimer\'s disease. Understanding of the symptom occurrence and their clusterization can inform clinical drug development and use of existing and future BPSD treatments.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the ability of a commonly used principal component analysis to identify BPSD patterns as assessed by Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).
    UNASSIGNED: NPI scores from the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS) were used to characterize reported occurrence of individual symptoms and their combinations. Based on this information, we have designed and conducted a simulation experiment to compare Principal Component analysis (PCA) and zero-inflated PCA (ZI PCA) by their ability to reveal true symptom associations.
    UNASSIGNED: Exploratory analysis of the ADAMS database revealed overlapping multivariate distributions of NPI symptom scores. Simulation experiments have indicated that PCA and ZI PCA cannot handle data with multiple overlapping patterns. Although the principal component analysis approach is commonly applied to NPI scores, it is at risk to reveal BPSD clusters that are a statistical phenomenon rather than symptom associations occurring in clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: We recommend the thorough characterization of multivariate distributions before subjecting any dataset to Principal Component Analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管负担很大,成本,阿尔茨海默病(AD)伴痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)的预后较差,对这些症状的分子原因知之甚少。使用AD患者BPSD的死前评估,我们证明了个体BPSD在我们的队列中可以分为4个领域因素:情感,冷漠,激动,和精神病。然后,我们利用死后前扣带皮质(ACC)组织的大量RNA-seq对每个结构域进行了全转录组分析.尽管所有4个结构域都与数百个差异表达基因(DEG)的主要下调模式相关,大多数DEG对每个域都是唯一的,所有BPSD域都只有22个DEG,包括TIMP1。加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)产生了多个转录模块,这些模块在BPSD结构域之间共享或每个结构域独特。NetDecoder用于分析通过生物网络的上下文相关信息流。对于搅动域,我们发现所有DEGs和高度相关的转录模块在功能上富集了ECM相关基因,包括TIMP1,TAGLN,还有FLNA.另一个独特的转录模块也与搅动结构域相关,富含参与突触后信号传导的基因,包括DRD1、PDE1B、CAMK4和GABRA4。通过比较案例和控制网络之间DEG的上下文相关变化,ESRl和PARK2被认为是与激动相关的两个高影响基因,它们介导了通过生物网络的重要信息流。总的来说,我们的工作为未来研究BPSD的生物学机制和由此产生的药物开发建立了独特的靶标.
    Despite the significant burden, cost, and worse prognosis of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), little is known about the molecular causes of these symptoms. Using antemortem assessments of BPSD in AD, we demonstrate that individual BPSD can be grouped into 4 domain factors in our cohort: affective, apathy, agitation, and psychosis. Then, we performed a transcriptome-wide analysis for each domain utilizing bulk RNA-seq of post-mortem anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) tissues. Though all 4 domains are associated with a predominantly downregulated pattern of hundreds of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), most DEGs are unique to each domain, with only 22 DEGs being common to all BPSD domains, including TIMP1. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) yielded multiple transcriptional modules that were shared between BPSD domains or unique to each domain, and NetDecoder was used to analyze context-dependent information flow through the biological network. For the agitation domain, we found that all DEGs and a highly associated transcriptional module were functionally enriched for ECM-related genes including TIMP1, TAGLN, and FLNA. Another unique transcriptional module also associated with the agitation domain was enriched with genes involved in post-synaptic signaling, including DRD1, PDE1B, CAMK4, and GABRA4. By comparing context-dependent changes in DEGs between cases and control networks, ESR1 and PARK2 were implicated as two high-impact genes associated with agitation that mediated significant information flow through the biological network. Overall, our work establishes unique targets for future study of the biological mechanisms of BPSD and resultant drug development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:痴呆症通常与神经精神症状(NPS)有关,例如躁动,抑郁症,幻觉,焦虑,这可能会给长期护理环境中患有痴呆症的居民带来痛苦,并可能给环境带来情感负担。NPS通常用精神药物治疗,which,然而,经常引起副作用。或者,非药物干预可以改善痴呆症患者的健康并维持最佳生活质量(QoL).其他QoL相关结果,如疼痛,不适和睡眠中断也是音乐试验的相关结果.音乐疗法是一种非药物干预措施,可以减少NPS并改善幸福感,及其在痴呆症中的相关症状。
    方法:这项研究将在荷兰一家医疗机构的八个疗养院进行。每组(实验组和对照组)的样本量为30,考虑到预期的辍学跟进,共有60名居民增加到80名。干预组的参与者在自己的房间里接受音乐治疗师30分钟的个人音乐疗法(MT),每周两次,持续12周。对照组的参与者将在自己的房间中接受志愿者的30分钟的个人关注,每周两次,持续12周。评估将在基线进行,6周和12周。一个独立的观察者,对干预或控制条件视而不见,将在会议之前和之后直接评估观察到的健康(主要结果)和疼痛(次要结果)。护士将评估其他次要结果,即,感知的生活质量和NPS,两者都用经过验证的量表进行评估。睡眠持续时间将由称为MotionWatch的手腕设备间接评估。有关精神药物使用的信息将来自电子医学图表审查。
    结论:这项研究的主要目的是评估个人音乐疗法对NPS痴呆的养老院居民中直接观察到的健康控制的影响。结果是指短期和长期效果与长期护理目标一致。我们希望克服以前研究设计的局限性,例如不盲目的设计和音乐促进者,不仅是音乐治疗师,而且是职业治疗师和护士。这项研究应该为实践提供更有针对性的建议,并进一步研究痴呆症的非药物干预措施,如音乐疗法。
    背景:该试验已在荷兰的国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)搜索门户注册试验注册号NL7708,注册日期04-05-2019。
    BACKGROUND: Dementia is often associated with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (NPS) such as agitation, depression, hallucinations, anxiety, that can cause distress for the resident with dementia in long-term care settings and can impose emotional burden on the environment. NPS are often treated with psychotropic drugs, which, however, frequently cause side effects. Alternatively, non-pharmacological interventions can improve well-being and maintain an optimal quality of life (QoL) of those living with dementia. Other QoL related outcomes, such as pain, discomfort and sleep disruption are relevant outcomes in music trials as well. Music therapy is a non-pharmacological intervention that can reduce NPS and improve well-being, and its associated symptoms in dementia.
    METHODS: The research will be conducted at eight nursing home facilities of a health care organization in the Netherlands. A sample size of 30 in each group (experimental and control group) is required, totalling 60 residents increased to 80 when considering expected drop out to follow up. The participants in the intervention group receive 30 min of individual music therapy (MT) in their own room by a music therapist twice a week for 12 weeks. The participants in the control group will receive 30 min of individual attention in their own room by a volunteer twice a week for 12 weeks. Assessments will be done at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. An independent observer, blinded for the intervention or control condition, will assess directly observed well-being (primary outcome) and pain (secondary outcome) before and after the sessions. Nurses will assess other secondary outcomes unblinded, i.e., perceived quality of life and NPS, both assessed with validated scales. The sleep duration will be indirectly assessed by a wrist device called MotionWatch. Information about psychotropic drug use will be derived from electronic medical chart review.
    CONCLUSIONS: The main purpose of this study is to assess the effects of individual music therapy on directly observed well-being controlled for individual attention in nursing home residents with dementia with NPS. The outcomes refer to both short-term and long-term effects consistent with therapeutic goals of care for a longer term. We hope to overcome limitations of previous study designs such as not blinded designs and music facilitators that were not only music therapists but also occupational therapists and nurses. This study should lead to more focused recommendations for practice and further research into non-pharmacological interventions in dementia such as music therapy.
    BACKGROUND: The trial is registered at the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal in the Netherlands Trial Registration number NL7708, registration date 04-05-2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着全球人口老龄化的加剧,痴呆症护理已迅速成为一个主要的社会问题。目前对痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)的诊断依赖于临床访谈,和基于一段时间的行为观察的行为评级量表,但这些方法并不适合于在日常生活中识别BPSD的发生,这对于为痴呆症提供适当的干预措施是必要的,虽然,文献中很少有研究小组对其进行研究。为了解决这些问题,在这项研究中开发了一个由心理认知(Psyco)BPSD模型组成的BPSD监测系统,行为-生理-环境(BePhyEn)BPSD模型,和一个实施平台。PsyCoBPSD模型为护理人员和护理提供者提供BPSD评估支持,虽然BePhyEnBPSD模型为BPSD提供了由24小时家庭监控平台启用的即时警报,以进行早期干预,从而减轻患者和护理人员的负担。通过广泛的文献回顾和规律性确定,生成了用于获取模型的数据。移动机器人被用作提高家庭监控传感器灵敏度的实施平台,并对老年人个体遵循的算法进行了研究。在虚拟家庭环境中的实验表明,机器人可以安全地跟踪虚拟BPSD老年人,可以准确识别BPSD的发生,证明了在家庭环境中进行BPSD建模和识别的可能性。
    With the increasing global aging population, dementia care has rapidly become a major social problem. Current diagnosis of Behavior and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) relies on clinical interviews, and behavioral rating scales based on a period of behavior observation, but these methods are not suitable for identification of occurrence of BPSD in the daily living, which is necessary for providing appropriate interventions for dementia, though, has been studied by few research groups in the literature. To address these issues, in this study developed a BPSD monitoring system consisting of a Psycho-Cognitive (PsyCo) BPSD model, a Behavior-Physio-Environment (BePhyEn) BPSD model, and an implementation platform. The PsyCo BPSD model provides BPSD assessment support to caregivers and care providers, while the BePhyEn BPSD model provides instantaneous alerts for BPSD enabled by a 24-hour home monitoring platform for early intervention, and thereby alleviation of burden to patients and caregivers. Data for acquiring the models were generated through extensive literature review and regularity determined. A mobile robot was utilized as the implementation platform for improving sensitivity of sensors for home monitoring, and elderly individual following algorithms were investigated. Experiments in a virtual home environment showed that, a virtual BPSD elderly individual can be followed safely by the robot, and BPSD occurrence could be identified accurately, demonstrating the possibility of modeling and identification of BPSD in home environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究报告了社会隔离对痴呆症患者及其照顾者的心理健康的负面影响,但纵向研究似乎很少。
    描述了COVID-19大流行对巴西和智利普华永道及其照顾者的一年随访影响。
    这项研究分析了在巴西(n=68)和智利(n=61)的三家门诊诊所进行为期一年的随访后,大流行对普华永道及其家庭护理人员的心理和身体健康的影响。
    在这两个国家,经过一年的随访,PwD降低了他们的功能能力(分别为p=0.017和p=0.009),护理人员的身心健康状况较差(p=0.028和p=0.039)。只有在智利,护理人员报告了更多与护理相关的悲伤(p=0.001),减少睡眠时间(p=0.07)。
    总而言之,COVID-19大流行似乎对PwD及其护理人员产生了长期影响。然而,必须承认,痴呆本身的内在进展也可能影响一年内观察到的变化.
    UNASSIGNED: Previous studies reported the negative impact of social isolation on mental health in people with dementia (PwD) and their caregivers, butlongitudinal studies seem scarcer.
    UNASSIGNED: To describe a one-year follow-up impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PwD and their caregivers in both Brazil and Chile.
    UNASSIGNED: This study analyzed the impact of the pandemic on the psychological and physical health of PwD and their family caregivers after one year of follow-up in three outpatient clinics in Brazil (n = 68) and Chile (n = 61).
    UNASSIGNED: In both countries, PwD reduced their functional capacity after one year of follow-up (p = 0.017 and p = 0.009; respectively) and caregivers reported worse physical and mental health (p = 0.028 and p = 0.039). Only in Chile, caregivers reported more sadness associated with care (p = 0.001), and reduced time sleeping (p = 0.07).
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have had a long-lasting impact on PwD and their caregivers. However, it is essential to acknowledge that the inherent progression of dementia itself may also influence changes observed over a year.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    尽管指南建议进行体育锻炼(PA),对于哪些类型的行为改变策略(BCSs)有效促进活动不足的老年人PA持续升高,人们知之甚少.
    为了确定是否存在内部BCS(例如,目标设定)或人际BCS(例如,点对点共享或学习)与奥塔哥运动计划(17种力量和平衡练习以及一项学习和量身定制的步行计划相结合,指导在家中或选择的位置每周执行3次)和可穿戴PA监测器可帮助老年人维持PA的增加。
    这项2×2因子随机临床试验(基于社区的干预对老年人身体活动的影响)是在城市社区中心进行的70岁或70岁以上的社区居住老年人PA水平低于最低国家PA指南。入学日期为2017年11月17日至2021年6月15日,最终随访评估于2022年9月2日完成。
    参与者被随机分配到个人内部(例如,目标设定)BCS,人际关系(例如,通过点对点共享和学习解决问题)BCS,内部和人际BCS,或注意力控制组。所有干预措施都包括一名PA监测员和每周8次小团体会议,并进行讨论。实践,以及在会议之间和干预后独立实施锻炼计划和相关BCS的指示。
    主要结果是每天客观测量的总PA(光照,中度,或剧烈强度)平均7到10天,在基线和干预后1周测量,6个月,和12个月。
    在309名参与者中(平均[SD]年龄,77.4[5.0]岁;240名妇女[77.7%]),305(98.7%)完成干预,302(97.7%)有完整数据.接受PA干预的参与者与人际BCS成分相比,在1周时没有接受PA干预的参与者显示出总PA的增加更大(每天204对177PA分钟;调整后的差异,27.1[95%CI,17.2-37.0];P<.001),6个月(每天195对175PA分钟;调整后的差异,20.8[95%CI,10.0-31.6];P<.001),和12个月(每天195分钟vs168分钟;调整后的差额,干预后27.5[95%CI,16.2-38.8];P<.001)。与未接受内部BCS成分干预的参与者相比,接受BCSs的参与者在1周时总PA没有显着变化(每天192对190PA分钟;调整后的差异,1.8[95%CI,-8.6至12.2];P=.73),6个月(每天183对187PA分钟;调整后的差异,-3.9[95%CI,-15.0至7.1];P=.49),或12个月(每天177分钟vs186PA分钟;调整后的差异,-8.8[95%CI,-20.5至2.9];P=.14)干预后。内部和人际BCS之间的相互作用并不显着。
    在这项随机临床试验中,接受人际BCS的PA水平较低的老年人,锻炼计划,PA监测器在干预后的12个月内显示PA显着增加。个人BCS不会引起明显的PA变化,也不会与个人BCS相互作用。我们的研究结果表明,由于PA干预对老年人PA持续增加的影响是通过人际而非人际BCS增强的,应考虑传播和实施干预措施的方法。
    ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03326141。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite guidelines that recommend physical activity (PA), little is known about which types of behavior change strategies (BCSs) effectively promote sustained increases in PA in older adults who are insufficiently active.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine whether intrapersonal BCSs (eg, goal setting) or interpersonal BCSs (eg, peer-to-peer sharing or learning) combined with the Otago Exercise Program (17 strength and balance exercises and a walking program that are learned and individually tailored, with instruction to perform 3 times per week at home or location of choice) and a wearable PA monitor help older adults sustain increases in their PA.
    UNASSIGNED: This 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial (Community-Based Intervention Effects on Older Adults\' Physical Activity) of community-dwelling older adults 70 years or older with PA levels below minimum national PA guidelines was conducted in urban community centers. Dates of enrollment were from November 17, 2017, to June 15, 2021, with final follow-up assessments completed on September 2, 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were randomized to intrapersonal (eg, goal setting) BCSs, interpersonal (eg, problem-solving with peer-to-peer sharing and learning) BCSs, intrapersonal and interpersonal BCSs, or an attention control group. All interventions included a PA monitor and 8 weekly small-group meetings with discussion, practice, and instructions to implement the exercise program and relevant BCSs independently between meetings and after the intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was daily minutes of objectively measured total PA (light, moderate, or vigorous intensities) averaged over 7 to 10 days, measured at baseline and after the intervention at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 309 participants (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [5.0] years; 240 women [77.7%]), 305 (98.7%) completed the intervention, and 302 (97.7%) had complete data. Participants receiving PA interventions with interpersonal BCS components exhibited greater increases in total PA than did those who did not at 1 week (204 vs 177 PA minutes per day; adjusted difference, 27.1 [95% CI, 17.2-37.0]; P < .001), 6 months (195 vs 175 PA minutes per day; adjusted difference, 20.8 [95% CI, 10.0-31.6]; P < .001), and 12 months (195 vs 168 PA minutes per day; adjusted difference, 27.5 [95% CI, 16.2-38.8]; P < .001) after the intervention. Compared with participants who did not receive interventions with intrapersonal BCS components, participants who received intrapersonal BCSs exhibited no significant changes in total PA at 1 week (192 vs 190 PA minutes per day; adjusted difference, 1.8 [95% CI, -8.6 to 12.2]; P = .73), 6 months (183 vs 187 PA minutes per day; adjusted difference, -3.9 [95% CI, -15.0 to 7.1]; P = .49), or 12 months (177 vs 186 PA minutes per day; adjusted difference, -8.8 [95% CI, -20.5 to 2.9]; P = .14) after the intervention. Interactions between intrapersonal and interpersonal BCSs were not significant.
    UNASSIGNED: In this randomized clinical trial, older adults with low levels of PA who received interpersonal BCSs, the exercise program, and a PA monitor exhibited significant increases in their PA for up to 12 months after the intervention. Intrapersonal BCSs elicited no significant PA changes and did not interact with interpersonal BCSs. Our findings suggest that because effects of a PA intervention on sustained increases in older adults\' PA were augmented with interpersonal but not intrapersonal BCSs, approaches to disseminating and implementing the intervention should be considered.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03326141.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号