暂无摘要。

Objective: To describe the morphological and histopathological features of primary conjunctival basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in a young adult Filipino. Introduction: Malignant conjunctival tumors arise from different cells, the most common of which are squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), (including ocular surface squamous neoplasia [OSSN]), melanomas, and lymphomas. Primary conjunctival BCC is rare and can mimic the clinical features of OSSN. Only seven reported cases were published. Most cases are in the 6th-8th decades of life, and we report the first case in a young adult male. Case Summary: A 37/M, HIV-seronegative, presenting with a 3-year history of enlarging fleshy, pedunculated mass on the right eye measuring 8.5 mm × 8.0 mm at the superonasal limbus encroaching on the cornea, with prominent feeder vessels. Whitish-to-grayish plaques were observed on the surface of the lesions. Wide excision of the mass using the no-touch technique was performed under local anesthesia. Four cycles of mitomycin C (0.02%) were administered as chemoadjuvant therapy. Histopathology showed basaloid cells with peripheral palisading, most consistent with BCC. Immunohistochemistry was positive for Bcl-2 and CD10 markers and negative for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), confirming conjunctival BCC. Eight weeks postoperatively, fibrovascular tissue proliferation was noted at the excision site. Anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) revealed a thickened hyperreflective band that was continuous with the epithelium, indicating possible recurrence. Resection with rush frozen section revealed fibrotic tissue that was negative for tumor cells. The bare sclera was covered with conjunctival autograft. There was no recurrence of the lesion after 16 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Primary BCC of the conjunctiva is rarely encountered, especially in young individuals, mimicking squamous neoplasia both in morphology and histopathology. Therefore, this should be considered in the differential diagnosis of OSSN. Immunostaining is crucial in differentiating between the two conditions and confirming the diagnosis. In most cases, wide surgical excision is sufficient. In addition, adjuvant therapies may be beneficial in preventing tumor recurrence.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer, which presents with local invasion, has low metastasizing potential and a cure rate of 100% after surgical excision. BCC commonly involves sun-exposed areas with approximately 80%-85% of BCC located on the head or neck, 15% on the trunk, and <2% in unusual areas such as the abdomen, genitals, perianal skin, lateral edge of the foot, axilla, superior or inferior lip.

BACKGROUND: Amyloidosis is characterized by extracellular amyloid protein deposition. When amyloidosis intersects with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), it introduces complex diagnostic challenges. This study explored the overlap between primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis (PLCA) and BCC, examining amyloid deposits in BCC, systemic amyloidosis risk in PLCA, and various treatment methods.
METHODS: Two case studies were discussed, followed by a literature review, in which PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were utilized. The search, covering studies from infinity up to January 2024, focused on \"cutaneous amyloidosis,\" \"basal cell carcinoma,\" and related terms. Articles in English detailing the clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, treatment, and outcomes of cutaneous amyloidosis mimicking BCC were included. Data extraction and synthesis were performed by two independent reviewers.
METHODS: This study highlighted two cases exemplifying the complexity of diagnosing BCC and PLCA. The first case (a 64-year-old with a nodule on the cheek) and the second (a 67-year-old with a nodular lesion on the upper lip cheek) were initially suspected as BCC and were later identified as PLCA upon histopathological examination.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of amyloidosis within BCC nodules remains a diagnostic challenge. Although their coexistence is relatively prevalent, their local recurrence rates remain debatable. Various diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been suggested, such as topical creams and phototherapy. However, none have garnered conclusive and consistent evidence to establish reliable clinical application.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasized the importance of considering alternative pathologies in differential diagnoses. Future research should focus on understanding systemic amyloidosis risks and optimizing care for both conditions.

Perianal basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a rare occurrence, with limited documented cases in the existing literature. The precise etiology contributing to its onset remains inadequately elucidated. Macroscopically, perianal BCC often exhibits atypical features, potentially leading to diagnostic challenges. Histopathological examination plays a crucial role in distinguishing BCC from other cutaneous lesions in this region. Despite its localized nature, perianal BCC generally carries a favorable prognosis characterized by a gradual progression. However, diligent follow-up is essential to mitigate the risk of recurrence. Our clinical observation highlights a noteworthy yet uncommon manifestation. The patient, a 64-year-old male, presented with a persistent perianal lesion evolving over a three-month period. Symptoms included intermittent bleeding and purulent discharge, exacerbating the clinical picture. A biopsy was subsequently performed, confirming the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. Following this, the patient underwent external beam radiation therapy as part of the treatment regimen.

This case report introduces an innovative approach for tissue regeneration post-total excision of basal cell carcinoma utilizing a xenogeneic collagen matrix coupled with injectable platelet-rich fibrin. The clinical outcome underscores the efficacy and predictability of this protocol in soft tissue regeneration. While further investigation on a larger patient cohort is warranted to fully elucidate its effects and advantages, this technique holds promise in streamlining surgical procedures following excision of extraoral neoplasms. Notably, its simple handling, minimal resource requirements, and potential to mitigate donor site morbidity and patient comorbidities post-surgery signify its value in clinical practice.

Dermatological conditions often present diagnostic challenges due to their diverse manifestations and overlapping clinical features. In such cases, dermoscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique, has emerged as a valuable tool to enhance diagnostic accuracy and guide clinicians in reaching an appropriate differential diagnosis. By visualizing subsurface skin structures and microvascular patterns, dermoscopy provides additional information that complements clinical examination, aiding in the recognition of specific dermatoses and the differentiation between benign and malignant skin lesions. Herein, we present a case that demonstrates the utility of dermoscopy in distinguishing between an initial broad list of differential diagnoses, namely, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma in situ, and other inflammatory dermatitides, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, and narrowing down the differential diagnosis to just one likely diagnosis, which was basal cell carcinoma in our case.

Basal cell carcinoma is a skin cancer with a more benign clinical course, compared to other skin cancers. However, when left neglected, it can cause serious morbidity and mortality. A basal cell carcinoma larger than 5 cm is defined as giant. Common causes of these carcinomas are negligence, immunosuppression, low socioeconomic status, physical or mental dysfunction, light exposure, exposure to radiation, existence of a previous lesion, recurrence after treatment, and aggressive histologic pattern. In some cases, giant basal cell carcinoma has been described to infiltrate multiple intracranial structures and to be associated with distant metastasis. Herein, we present a case of a giant basal cell carcinoma on the temporary scalp of a renal transplant recipient with depression.

Basal cell carcinoma of the areola-nipple complex poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its rarity and unique anatomical location. This subtype of basal cell carcinoma necessitates meticulous management to address potential recurrence and metastasis. Surgical excision with clear margins remains the cornerstone treatment for basal cell carcinoma of the areola-nipple complex, while alternative modalities such as radiation therapy, Mohs surgery, and systemic therapies may be considered in specific cases. However, optimal management strategies remain contentious, with varying opinions on the necessity of aggressive surgical intervention to minimize recurrence and metastasis risks. Additionally, the absence of standardized diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines complicates clinical decision-making. Herein, we present a rare case of basal cell carcinoma of the areola-nipple complex in a 47-year-old woman with a notable medical history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and untreated psychosis, alongside a family history of breast cancer in her aunt. The patient exhibited a non-regressing ulceration on the right areolar region of the breast, persisting for approximately 10 years and progressively extending over time. Following surgical excision, a favorable post-therapeutic course was observed during follow-up. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges and nuanced management considerations inherent in basal cell carcinoma of the areola-nipple complex, underscoring the imperative for tailored treatment approaches.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer. Skin cancers may present either as a non-invasive tumor or an invasive malignancy. The terminology of carcinoma in situ is used when the tumor is either just limited to epidermis or not present as single cells or nests in the dermis. However, currently the terminology superficial BCC is inappropriately used instead of BCC in situ when the skin cancer is limited to epidermis. In this study we compare the pathologic changes of superficial, nodular, and infiltrative BCCs using electron microscopy to identify the ultrastructural characteristics and validate the previously proposed terminology. Three cases of BCC (superficial BCC, nodular BCC, and infiltrative BCC) diagnosed by dermatopathologists at our institute were selected for review. Paraffin block tissues from these cases were sent for electron microscopy studies which demonstrated disruption of basal lamina in both nodular and infiltrative type of BCC, while it remains intact in BCC superficial type after extensive examination. Therefore, similar to other in situ skin cancers, there is no invasion of the neoplasm in superficial BCC into the dermis. Hence, the older term superficial BCC should be appropriately replaced with the newer terminology BCC in situ.