Barrett Esophagus

Barrett 食管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    射频消融(RFA)是治疗发育不良Barrett食管(BE)的一线治疗方法。因此,冷冻疗法已成为一种替代治疗选择。本研究旨在根据肠上皮化生(CE-IM)和发育不良(CE-D)的完全根除率比较这两种技术的有效性。不良事件和复发也有报道。
    使用Medline(PubMed)进行了电子搜索,Embase,LILACS,和谷歌学术数据库,直到2022年12月。包括比较冷冻疗法和RFA治疗有或没有早期食管肿瘤的发育不良BE的研究。这项研究是根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行的。
    纳入了三个回顾性队列研究,涉及627名患者。其中,399例患者接受RFA,228例接受冷冻治疗。CE-IM没有差异(风险差异[RD],-0.03;95%置信区间[CI],-0.25至0.19;p=0.78;I2=86%)以及CE-D(RD,组间-0.03;95%CI,-0.15至0.09;p=0.64;I2=70%)。不良事件的绝对数量较低,复发率无差异。
    冷冻疗法和RFA在治疗发育不良的BE方面同样有效,有或没有早期食管肿瘤。
    OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the first-line therapy for dysplastic Barrett\'s esophagus (BE). Therefore, cryotherapy has emerged as an alternative treatment option. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of these two techniques based on the rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and dysplasia (CE-D). Adverse events and recurrence have also been reported.
    METHODS: An electronic search was conducted using the Medline (PubMed), Embase, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases until December 2022. Studies were included comparing cryotherapy and RFA for treating dysplastic BE with or without early esophageal neoplasia. This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
    RESULTS: Three retrospective cohort studies involving 627 patients were included. Of these, 399 patients underwent RFA, and 228 were treated with cryotherapy. There was no difference in CE-IM (risk difference [RD], -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.25 to 0.19; p=0.78; I2=86%) as well as in CE-D (RD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.09; p=0.64; I2=70%) between the groups. The absolute number of adverse events was low, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cryotherapy and RFA were equally effective in treating dysplastic BE, with or without early esophageal neoplasia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用对2022年期间在胃肠内窥镜检查和其他高影响力医学和胃肠病学期刊上发表的原始文章进行系统的文献检索,由10名成员组成的美国胃肠内窥镜学会编辑委员会在研究年度中列出了GI内窥镜检查的10个最重要的主题领域.每个编辑委员会成员都被指示在生成候选列表时考虑3个标准-重要性,新奇,主席通过电子投票促进了对临床实践的全球影响和主题共识。确定的10个领域共同代表了以下内窥镜领域的进步:人工智能,内镜黏膜下剥离术,巴雷特食管,介入性EUS,内镜切除技术,胰胆管内窥镜检查,急性胰腺炎的管理,内窥镜环境可持续性,NordICC的审判,还有螺旋小肠镜.每位董事会成员都被分配了一个共识主题区域,以总结相关的重要文章,从而产生了2022年“前10名”内窥镜技术的进步。
    Using a systematic literature search of original articles published during 2022 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals, the 10-member Editorial Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy composed a list of the 10 most significant topic areas in GI endoscopy during the study year. Each Editorial Board member was directed to consider 3 criteria in generating candidate lists-significance, novelty, and global impact on clinical practice-and subject matter consensus was facilitated by the Chair through electronic voting. The 10 identified areas collectively represent advances in the following endoscopic spheres: artificial intelligence, endoscopic submucosal dissection, Barrett\'s esophagus, interventional EUS, endoscopic resection techniques, pancreaticobiliary endoscopy, management of acute pancreatitis, endoscopic environmental sustainability, the NordICC trial, and spiral enteroscopy. Each board member was assigned a consensus topic area around which to summarize relevant important articles, thereby generating this précis of the \"top 10\" endoscopic advances of 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在调查新发胃食管反流的发生率。反流变化,食管炎,巴雷特食管,和由于反流引起的修订,胃炎,一次吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)后的边缘溃疡。我们根据主要和修订的OAGB以及随访时间进行了亚组分析。对87项研究的27,775例患者进行的荟萃分析显示,OAGB后新发反流的发生率为6%。OAGB后,术前返流状态无明显变化。食管炎和Barrett食管的发生率分别为15%和1%,分别。OAGB术后新发反流率显着高于胃旁路术,但与袖状胃切除术没有差异。目前的研究表明,OAGB后的反流率及其并发症相对较低,但明显高于Roux-en-Y胃旁路术.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence of new-onset gastroesophageal reflux, reflux change, esophagitis, Barrett\'s esophagus, and revision due to reflux, gastritis, and marginal ulcer after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). We performed subgroup analyses based on primary and revisional OAGB and time of follow-up. Meta-analysis of 87 studies with 27,775 patients showed a 6% rate of new-onset reflux after OAGB. Preoperative reflux status did not change significantly after OAGB. The rate of esophagitis and Barrett\'s esophagus was 15% and 1%, respectively. The new-onset reflux rate after OAGB was significantly higher than gastric bypass but not different with sleeve gastrectomy. The current study showed a relatively low rate of reflux and its complications after OAGB, but it was significantly higher than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:虽然胃食管反流病(GERD)症状是大多数胃肠病学指南中Barrett食管(BE)筛查的基本标准,相当比例的BE和食管腺癌(EAC)病例不认可它们。在系统评价和荟萃分析(SRM)中,我们旨在研究有和没有GERD的患者中BE/EAC的患病率.
    方法:通过5个主要数据库进行系统检索,以研究报告有和无GERD患者的BE/EAC患病率。BE的合并比例和赔率比(OR),长段BE(LSBE),短段BE(SSBE),有和没有GERD的患者的异型增生和EAC被合成。
    结果:最终分析包括43篇文章(12,883例患者;51,350例无GERD)。在有和无GERD的个体中,BE患病率分别为7%(95%CI5.8-8.5)和2.2%(1.6-3),分别。有和没有GERD的EAC患病率分别为0.6%(0.4-1)和0.1%(0-0.2),分别。GERD患者的BE(OR=2.91;2.06-4.11)和LSBE(OR=4.17;1.78-9.77)的总体风险较高,但两组的SSBE风险(OR=1.77;0.89-3.52)没有差异.在9项基于人群的高质量研究中(2244例患者;3724例无GERD),无GERD患者的BE患病率为4.9%(95%CI2.6-9)。BE患病率在北美研究中最高(10.6%[GERD]和4.8%[非GERD])。
    结论:无GERD患者的BE患病率相当高,特别是在大型高质量的基于人群的研究中。这些数据对于考虑未来的BE/EAC早期检测指南非常重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are an essential criterion for Barrett\'s esophagus (BE) screening in most gastroenterology society guidelines, a significant proportion of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases do not endorse them. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to study the prevalence of BE/EAC in those with and without GERD.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted through 5 major databases for studies reporting prevalence of BE/EAC in patients with and without GERD. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of BE, long-segment BE, short-segment BE, dysplasia, and EAC in patients with and without GERD were synthesized.
    RESULTS: Forty-three articles (12,883 patients with GERD; 51,350 patients without GERD) were included in the final analysis. BE prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8%-8.5%) and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.6%-3%) among individuals with and without GERD, respectively. EAC prevalence was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-1%) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.2%) in those with and without GERD, respectively. The overall risks for BE (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.06-4.11) and long-segment BE (OR,4.17; 95% CI, 1.78-9.77) were higher in patients with GERD, but the risk for short-segment BE (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.89-3.52) did not differ between the two groups. In 9 population-based high-quality studies (2244 patients with GERD; 3724 patients without GERD), BE prevalence in patients without GERD was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.6%-9%). BE prevalence was highest in North American studies (10.6% [GERD] and 4.8% [non-GERD]).
    CONCLUSIONS: BE prevalence in those without GERD is substantial, particularly in large high-quality population-based studies. These data are important to factor in future BE/EAC early detection guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本范围审查的目的是了解范围,证据类型,以及与内镜治疗(ET)对Barrett发育不良和早期食管癌患者健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)的影响相关的总体发现。
    方法:对2001年至2022年之间在计算机数据库中的文献进行了全面搜索(PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和CINAHL完成)。此外,在Google高级搜索中搜索了未发表文献的来源。在标题和摘要检查之后,检索了全文论文。数据被提取,合成,关键信息列表,并完成了叙事综合。
    结果:六项研究纳入最终分析。在所有研究中使用了12种不同的调查工具。研究设计包括三项随机对照研究,两项前瞻性观察性研究,和一项回顾性观察研究。研究参与者的平均年龄为60.3至71.0岁。两项研究评估了HR-QoL作为主要结果指标,但大多数研究将HR-QoL评估为次要结局。研究中评估的健康领域侧重于生活质量的生物物理和心理社会方面。
    结论:在这一领域已经进行了少量的研究。由于异质性和纳入研究数量少,很难得出关于特定ET类型对HR-QoL的影响的结论。总的来说,在接受ET时,有明显的心理益处。未来的研究可以针对特定的ET亚型,并在基线和术后短期和长期测量HR-QoL。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent, type of evidence, and overall findings in relation to the impact of endoscopic treatment (ET) on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients with Barrett\'s dysplasia and early oesophageal cancer.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted for literature between 2001 and 2022 in computerised databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL Complete). Additionally, sources of unpublished literature were searched in Google Advanced Search. After title and abstract checking, full-text papers were retrieved. Data were extracted, synthesised, key information tabulated, and a narrative synthesis completed.
    RESULTS: Six studies were included in the final analysis. Twelve different survey tools were utilised across all studies. Study designs included three randomised controlled studies, two prospective observational studies, and a single retrospective observational study. The average age of study participants ranged from 60.3 to 71.0 years. Two studies evaluated HR-QoL as primary outcome measures, but most research evaluated HR-QoL as a secondary outcome. Health domains evaluated in the studies focussed on the biophysical and psychosocial aspects of quality of life.
    CONCLUSIONS: A small number of research studies have been conducted in this area. Due to the heterogeneity and small number of included studies, it was difficult to draw conclusions about the impact of specific ET types on HR-QoL. Overall, there were perceived psychological benefits while undergoing ET. Future research could target specific ET subtypes and measure HR-QoL at baseline and post-procedures in the short and long term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氩气凝固术(APC)是射频消融治疗Barrett食管(BE)的替代消融方法,它是首选,因为它的成本较低和广泛的可用性。本荟萃分析旨在分析APC治疗BE的安全性和有效性。
    从2000年1月至2022年11月进行了文献检索,以分析APC在BE中的结果。主要结果是肠上皮化生清除率和不良事件(AE)。汇总事件发生率用总结性统计学表示。
    共有38项研究纳入最终分析。合并事件对BE中APC肠化生清除率的比率为86.8%(95%可信区间[CI],83.5%至90.2%),与标准APC相比,高功率和混合APC具有更高的速率。BE中APC合并AE的合并发生率为22.5%(95%CI,15.3%至29.7%),亚组之间没有任何显著差异,自限性胸痛是最常见的AE。严重AE的发生率仅为0.4%(95%CI,0.0%至1.0%),而仅在1.7%(95%CI,0.9%至2.6%)的病例中观察到狭窄发展。BE的合并复发率为16.1%(95%CI,10.7%至21.6%),高功率APC的复发率明显低于标准APC。
    高功率和混合APC似乎在清除率和复发率方面比标准APC具有优势。需要进一步的研究来比较混合APC与标准APC和射频消融的疗效和安全性。
    UNASSIGNED: Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is an alternate ablative method to radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of Barrett\'s esophagus (BE), and it is preferred due to its lower cost and widespread availability. The present meta-analysis aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of APC for the management of BE.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search from January 2000 to November 2022 was done for studies analyzing the outcome of APC in BE. The primary outcomes were clearance rate of intestinal metaplasia and adverse events (AE). Pooled event rates were expressed with summative statistics.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 38 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled event rate for clearance rate of intestinal metaplasia with APC in BE was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.5% to 90.2%), with high-power and hybrid APC having a higher rate compared to standard APC. The pooled incidence of AE with APC in BE was 22.5% (95% CI, 15.3% to 29.7%), without any significant difference between the subgroups, with self-limited chest pain being the commonest AE. The incidence of serious AE was only 0.4% (95% CI, 0.0% to 1.0%), while stricture development was seen only in 1.7% (95% CI, 0.9% to 2.6%) of cases. The pooled recurrence rate of BE was 16.1% (95% CI, 10.7% to 21.6%), with a significantly lower recurrence with high-power APC than standard APC.
    UNASSIGNED: High-power and hybrid APC seem to have an advantage over standard APC in terms of clearance rate and recurrence rate. Further studies are required to compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid APC with standard APC and radiofrequency ablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:低度发育不良(LGD)与Barrett食管(BE)进展风险增加相关。然而,LGD的诊断受观察者间差异的限制。多项研究表明,客观的组织系统病理学测试(TissueCypherBarrett食管试验,TSP-9),可以有效预测BE患者的肿瘤进展。本研究旨在比较TSP-9测试与通才和专家病理学基准的风险分层性能。
    方法:在一项针对患有社区LGD的BE患者的随机对照试验的筛查队列中进行了一项盲法队列研究。通过TSP-9测试评估了首次使用LGD进行内窥镜检查的活检,并根据标准实践由来自五个国家的30名病理学家进行了独立审查。比较了预测高度异型增生(HGD)和食管腺癌(EAC)的测试和诊断的准确性。
    结果:154名BE患者(122名男性),研究平均年龄60.9+/-9.8岁.24例患者在5年内进展到HGD/EAC(中位时间为1.7年),130例患者在5年内未进展到HGD/EAC(中位随访7.8年)。TSP-9测试显示出更高的灵敏度(71%vs.平均63%,30位病理学家的33-88%),在检测进展的患者中,病理检查优于病理检查(P=0.01186)。
    结论:TSP-9检验在对患有LGD的BE患者进行风险分层方面优于病理学家。以试验为指导的护理可以为LGD的可变病理检查提供有效的解决方案,通过将护理升级为治疗性干预,改善疾病进展高风险患者的健康结果,同时减少对低风险患者的不必要干预。
    Low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is associated with an increased risk of progression in Barrett\'s esophagus (BE); however, the diagnosis of LGD is limited by substantial interobserver variability. Multiple studies have shown that an objective tissue systems pathology test (TissueCypher Barrett\'s Esophagus Test, TSP-9), can effectively predict neoplastic progression in patients with BE. This study aimed to compare the risk stratification performance of the TSP-9 test vs benchmarks of generalist and expert pathology.
    A blinded cohort study was conducted in the screening cohort of a randomized controlled trial of patients with BE with community-based LGD. Biopsies from the first endoscopy with LGD were assessed by the TSP-9 test and independently reviewed by 30 pathologists from 5 countries per standard practice. The accuracy of the test and the diagnoses in predicting high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) were compared.
    A total of 154 patients with BE (122 men), mean age 60.9 ± 9.8 years were studied. Twenty-four patients progressed to HGD/EAC within 5 years (median time of 1.7 years) and 130 did not progress to HGD/EAC within 5 years (median 7.8 years follow-up). The TSP-9 test demonstrated higher sensitivity (71% vs mean 63%, range 33%-88% across 30 pathologists), than the pathology review in detecting patients who progressed (P = .01186).
    The TSP-9 test outperformed the pathologists in risk stratifying patients with BE with LGD. Care guided by the test can provide an effective solution to variable pathology review of LGD, improving health outcomes by upstaging care to therapeutic intervention for patients at high risk for progression, while reducing unnecessary interventions in low-risk patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    食管腺癌(EAC)的发病率迅速增加,并与预后不良有关。Barrett食管(BE)是已知的食管腺癌的前体。这篇综述旨在探讨巴雷特食管,食管腺癌,以及从前者到后者的发展。定义的概述,诊断,流行病学,并列出了两个实体的风险因素,特别关注文献中的辩论领域。本文综述了Barrett食管向食管腺癌的进展,并讨论了相关的分子通路。巴雷特食管的定义仍存在争议,没有国际共识。这个,除了其他因素,建立巴雷特食管的真正患病率具有挑战性。发育不良的程度可能是一个组织学挑战,但指导临床管理是必要的。BE向EAC的进展可能是由炎症途径驱动的,胃蛋白酶暴露,生长因子途径的上调,和线粒体变化。通过连续的内窥镜评估来维持监测,较短的间隔建议高风险的特征。
    Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is rapidly increasing in incidence and is associated with a poor prognosis. Barrett\'s esophagus (BE) is a known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review aims to explore Barrett\'s esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the progression from the former to the latter. An overview of the definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, and risk factors for both entities are presented, with special attention being given to the areas of debate in the literature. The progression from Barrett\'s esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma is reviewed and the relevant molecular pathways are discussed. The definition of Barrett\'s esophagus remains debated and without international consensus. This, alongside other factors, has made establishing the true prevalence of Barrett\'s esophagus challenging. The degree of dysplasia can be a histological challenge, but is necessary to guide clinical management. The progression of BE to EAC is likely driven by inflammatory pathways, pepsin exposure, upregulation of growth factor pathways, and mitochondrial changes. Surveillance is maintained through serial endoscopic evaluation, with shorter intervals recommended for high-risk features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:回顾有关食管闭锁(EA)患者长期健康问题和过渡护理的最新文献。PubMed,Scopus,Embase和WebofScience数据库筛选了有关年龄超过或等于11岁的EA患者的研究。在2014年8月至2022年6月之间发布。分析了涉及830名患者的16项研究。平均年龄为27.4岁(范围11-63)。EA亚型分布为:C型(48.8%),A(9.5%),D(1.9%),E(0.5%)和B(0.2%)。55%接受了一期修复,34.3%延迟修复,10.5%食道替代。平均随访27.2年(范围11-63)。长期后遗症是:胃食管反流(41.4%),吞咽困难(27.6%),食管炎(12.4%),Barrett食管(8.1%),吻合口狭窄(4.8%);持续咳嗽(8.7%),反复感染(4.3%)和慢性呼吸系统疾病(5.5%)。在74例报告病例中,有36例存在肌肉骨骼畸形。在13.3%和6%的病例中,体重和身高下降。分别。9%的患者报告生活质量受损;9.6%的患者被诊断为精神障碍或增加了精神障碍的风险。10.3%的成年患者没有护理提供者。对816例患者进行Meta分析。估计患病率为:GERD42.4%,吞咽困难57.8%,Barrett食管12.4%,呼吸道疾病33.3%,神经后遗症11.7%,减持19.6%。异质性很大(>50%)。结论:EA患者必须在儿童期之后继续随访,由于多个长期后遗症,由高度专业化的多学科团队确定了过渡护理路径。
    背景:•由于手术技术和重症监护的改进,食管闭锁患者的生存率现在超过90%,因此,必须考虑患者在整个青春期和成年期的需求。
    背景:•这篇综述,通过总结有关食管闭锁长期后遗症的最新文献,可能有助于提高对定义食管闭锁患者过渡和成年护理标准化方案的重要性的认识。
    OBJECTIVE:  to review recent literature concerning long-term health issues and transitional care in esophageal atresia (EA) patients. PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were screened for studies regarding EA patients aged more than or equal to 11 years, published between August 2014 and June 2022. Sixteen studies involving 830 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 27.4 years (range 11-63). EA subtype distribution was: type C (48.8%), A (9.5%), D (1.9%), E (0.5%) and B (0.2%). 55% underwent primary repair, 34.3% delayed repair, 10.5% esophageal substitution. Mean follow-up was 27.2 years (range 11-63). Long-term sequelae were: gastro-esophageal reflux (41.4%), dysphagia (27.6%), esophagitis (12.4%), Barrett esophagus (8.1%), anastomotic stricture (4.8%); persistent cough (8.7%), recurrent infections (4.3%) and chronic respiratory diseases (5.5%). Musculo-skeletal deformities were present in 36 out of 74 reported cases. Reduced weight and height were detected in 13.3% and 6% cases, respectively. Impaired quality of life was reported in 9% of patients; 9.6% had diagnosis or raised risk of mental disorders. 10.3% of adult patients had no care provider. Meta-analysis was conducted on 816 patients. Estimated prevalences are: GERD 42.4%, dysphagia 57.8%, Barrett esophagus 12.4%, respiratory diseases 33.3%, neurological sequelae 11.7%, underweight 19.6%. Heterogeneity was substantial (> 50%).   Conclusion: EA patients must continue follow-up beyond childhood, with a defined transitional-care path by a highly specialized multidisciplinary team due to the multiple long-term sequelae.
    BACKGROUND: • Survival rates of esophageal atresia patients is now more than 90% thanks to the improvements in surgical techniques and intensive care, therefore patients\' needs throughout adolescence and adulthood must be taken into account.
    BACKGROUND: • This review, by summarizing recent literature concerning long term sequelae of esophageal atresia, may contribute to raise awareness on the importance of defining standardized protocols of transitional and adulthood care for esophageal atresia patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Barrett食管患者发生食管腺癌的风险增加。内窥镜治疗旨在根除发育不良和化生组织。混合氩等离子体凝固术(混合APC)利用粘膜下液体注射在消融之前创建保护垫,以保护粘膜下层免受损伤。我们进行了汇总荟萃分析,以评估混合APC的安全性和有效性。
    方法:我们于2022年4月对主要电子数据库进行了系统搜索。纳入发育异常和非发育异常的Barrett食管患者的研究有资格接受混合APC治疗。结果指标包括完全缓解肠上皮化生(CR-IM),狭窄形成,严重不良事件,以及实现CR-IM所需的会话数量。
    结果:接受混合APC的患者的总体合并CR-IM率为90.8%(95%置信区间[CI],0.872-0.939;I2=0%)。集合狭窄率为2.0%(95%CI,0.005-0.042;I2=0%)。总体严重不良事件发生率为2.7%(95%CI,0.007-0.055;I2=0%)。
    结论:当前荟萃分析的结果表明,混合APC与高CR-IM发生率和良好的安全性有关。这些结果的解释受到回顾性队列和病例系列数据的限制。标准化治疗和结果评估方案的随机对照试验是必要的,以了解这种治疗方案与当前的护理标准具有可比性。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with Barrett\'s esophagus are at increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic therapies aim to eradicate dysplastic and metaplastic tissues. Hybrid argon plasma coagulation (hybrid-APC) utilizes submucosal fluid injection to create a protective cushion prior to ablation that shields the submucosa from injury. We performed a pooled meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hybrid-APC.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of major electronic databases in April 2022. Studies that included patients with dysplastic and non-dysplastic Barrett\'s esophagus undergoing treatment with hybrid-APC were eligible for inclusion. Outcome measures included complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM), stricture formation, serious adverse events, and number of sessions necessary to achieve CR-IM.
    RESULTS: Overall pooled CR-IM rate for patients undergoing hybrid-APC was 90.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.872-0.939; I2=0%). Pooled stricture rate was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.005-0.042; I2=0%). Overall serious adverse event rate was 2.7% (95% CI, 0.007-0.055; I2=0%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current meta-analysis suggest that hybrid-APC is associated with high rates of CR-IM and a favorable safety profile. Interpretation of these results is limited by the inclusion of retrospective cohort and case series data. Randomized controlled trials that standardize treatment and outcome evaluation protocols are necessary to understand how this treatment option is comparable to the current standards of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号