Bacterial infection

细菌感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰石蛋白(PSP)是一种急性期反应物,主要响应应激反应而产生。已在几种临床环境中研究了其对几种类型感染的诊断和预后准确性。本综述的目的是评估所有研究,以检查胰石蛋白水平与诊断为感染的患者的严重程度和可能的并发症之间的可能联系。我们在PubMed进行了系统的搜索,Scopus,Cochrane图书馆和Clinicaltrials.gov旨在确定评估胰石蛋白在感染性疾病诊断和预后中的作用的原始临床研究。我们确定了22项符合条件的研究。其中十个提供了诊断方面,十项研究提供了预后方面,另外两项研究提供了诊断和预后信息.大多数研究是在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中进行的,五项研究是针对去过急诊科(ED)的患者,三项研究是针对烧伤患者的。根据文献,胰石蛋白已用于不同感染部位的患者,包括肺炎,软组织感染,腹腔感染,尿路感染,还有败血症.总之,由于PSP能够早期识别细菌感染和败血症,因此PSP似乎是ED和ICU的有用的即时生物标志物。需要进一步的研究来检查PSP在特定人群和条件下的动力学和效用。
    Pancreatic stone protein (PSP) is an acute-phase reactant mainly produced in response to stress. Its diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for several types of infection has been studied in several clinical settings. The aim of the current review was to assess all studies examining a possible connection of pancreatic stone protein levels with the severity and possible complications of patients diagnosed with infection. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov to identify original clinical studies assessing the role of pancreatic stone protein in the diagnosis and prognosis of infectious diseases. We identified 22 eligible studies. Ten of them provided diagnostic aspects, ten studies provided prognostic aspects, and another two studies provided both diagnostic and prognostic information. The majority of the studies were performed in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting, five studies were on patients who visited the emergency department (ED), and three studies were on burn-injury patients. According to the literature, pancreatic stone protein has been utilized in patients with different sites of infection, including pneumonia, soft tissue infections, intra-abdominal infections, urinary tract infections, and sepsis. In conclusion, PSP appears to be a useful point-of-care biomarker for the ED and ICU due to its ability to recognize bacterial infections and sepsis early. Further studies are required to examine PSP\'s kinetics and utility in specific populations and conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗接种已成为一种广泛用于诱导针对微生物病原体的免疫保护的方法,包括病毒和细菌微生物。体液和细胞免疫在中和和消除这些病原体中起关键作用。有效的疫苗应该能够诱导持久的免疫记忆反应。最近对不同T细胞亚群的研究已经使用多参数流式细胞术鉴定了新的T细胞亚群。它具有干细胞样特性,并且能够在重新暴露于称为干细胞样记忆T细胞(TSCM)的抗原时产生快速的免疫反应。当前疫苗的主要挑战之一是它们在适应性免疫系统中维持长期记忆的能力有限。最近的证据表明,记忆T细胞的特定亚组具有独特的能力,可以保持长达25年的寿命,正如在黄热病疫苗的情况下观察到的那样。因此,在这项研究中,我们试图探索和讨论这种新的T细胞记忆亚群在病毒和细菌疫苗开发中的潜在作用。
    Vaccination has become a widely used method to induce immune protection against microbial pathogens, including viral and bacterial microorganisms. Both humoral and cellular immunity serve a critical role in neutralizing and eliminating these pathogens. An effective vaccine should be able to induce a long-lasting immune memory response. Recent investigations on different subsets of T cells have identified a new subset of T cells using multi-parameter flow cytometry, which possess stem cell-like properties and the ability to mount a rapid immune response upon re-exposure to antigens known as stem cell-like memory T cells (TSCM). One of the major challenges with current vaccines is their limited ability to maintain long-term memory in the adaptive immune system. Recent evidence suggests that a specific subgroup of memory T cells has the unique ability to retain their longevity for up to 25 years, as observed in the case of the yellow fever vaccine. Therefore, in this study, we tried to explore and discuss the potential role of this new T cell memory subset in the development of viral and bacterial vaccines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:在西班牙和拉丁美洲的这些医疗保健地区,医院急诊科(ED)中疑似感染过程的患者的护理占所有日常护理的15%-35%。抗生素治疗(AB)的早期和充分施用以及立即做出其他诊断-治疗决定对严重细菌感染患者的生存有直接影响。本系统评价的主要目的是探讨PCT在临床怀疑感染的成人患者中预测细菌感染的诊断准确性。以及分析不同的研究是否能够从临床决策的诊断角度确定PCT的特定值是最相关的,可以推荐用于ED的决策。
    方法:根据PubMed数据库中的PRISMA规定进行系统审查,WebofScience,EMBASE,丁香花,科克伦,认识论,Tripdatabase和ClinicalTrials.gov从2005年1月至2023年5月31日,没有语言限制,并使用MESH术语的组合:“降钙素原”,“感染/细菌感染/脓毒症”,\"紧急情况/紧急情况/急诊科\",“成人”和“诊断”。包括观察性队列研究(诊断性能分析)。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估所用方法的质量和纳入文章的偏倚风险。纳入观察性队列研究。没有进行荟萃分析技术,但结果进行了叙述比较。
    结果:共确定了1,323篇文章,最终分析了其中符合纳入标准的21例。这些研究包括10333名患者,有4,856名细菌感染(47%)。八项研究被评为高,9为适度,4低。所有研究的AUC-ROC范围为0.68(95%CI:0.61-0.72)至0.99(95%CI:0.98-1)。PCT0.2-0.3ng/ml的值是本综述中最多使用和提出的十二项工作,其平均估计性能为AUC-ROC为0.79。如果仅考虑使用0.2-0.3ng/mlPCT截止点的5项高质量研究的结果,估计的平均AUC-COR结果为0.78,其中Se:69%,Es:76%。
    结论:PCT对不同感染过程的ED患者的细菌感染具有相当的诊断准确性。0.25(0.2-0.3)ng/ml的截止点已被定位为最适合预测细菌感染的存在,并可用于帮助合理排除细菌感染。
    OBJECTIVE: The care of patients with a suspected infectious process in hospital emergency departments (ED) accounts for 15%-35% of all daily care in these healthcare areas in Spain and Latin America. The early and adequate administration of antibiotic treatment (AB) and the immediate making of other diagnostic-therapeutic decisions have a direct impact on the survival of patients with severe bacterial infection. The main objective of this systematic review is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PCT to predict bacterial infection in adult patients treated with clinical suspicion of infection in the ED, as well as to analyze whether the different studies manage to identify a specific value of PCT as the most relevant from the diagnostic point of view of clinical decision that can be recommended for decision making in ED.
    METHODS: A systematic review is carried out following the PRISMA regulations in the database of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2005 to May 31, 2023 without language restriction and using a combination of MESH terms: \"Procalcitonin\", \"Infection/Bacterial Infection/Sepsis\", \"Emergencies/Emergency/Emergency Department\", \"Adults\" and \"Diagnostic\". Observational cohort studies (diagnostic performance analyses) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the method used and the risk of bias of the included articles. Observational cohort studies were included. No meta-analysis techniques were performed, but results were compared narratively.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,323 articles were identified, of which 21 that met the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed. The studies include 10,333 patients with 4,856 bacterial infections (47%). Eight studies were rated as high, 9 as moderate, and 4 as low. The AUC-ROC of all studies ranges from 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.72) to 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1). The value of PCT 0.2-0.3 ng/ml is the most used and proposed in up to twelve of the works included in this review whose average estimated performance is an AUC-ROC of 0.79. If only the results of the 5 high-quality studies using a cut-off point of 0.2-0.3 ng/ml PCT are taken into account, the estimated mean AUC-COR result is 0.78 with Se:69 % and Es:76%.
    CONCLUSIONS: PCT has considerable diagnostic accuracy for bacterial infection in patients treated in ED for different infectious processes. The cut-off point of 0.25 (0.2-0.3) ng/ml has been positioned as the most appropriate to predict the existence of bacterial infection and can be used to help reasonably rule it out.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:术语“来源(或重点)控制”包括可用于减少接种物并改变感染培养基中促进微生物生长或宿主外来抗菌防御的那些因素的所有物理措施。本系统评价(SR)的主要目的是了解和比较在ED治疗严重感染或败血症的成年患者中是否早期发现和控制病灶(在不到6小时内),与不控制焦点或延迟焦点控制(超过12小时)相比,更有效,更安全(改善临床进展,死亡率,并发症,住院或需要入住ICU)。
    方法:根据PubMed数据库中的PRISMA规定进行系统审查,WebofScience,EMBASE,丁香花,科克伦,认识论,Tripdatabase和ClinicalTrials.gov从2000年1月至2023年12月31日,没有语言限制,并使用MESH术语的组合:“源代码控制”,\"早期\"\"感染或细菌感染或败血症\",“紧急情况或紧急情况或急诊科”和“成人”。纳入观察性队列研究。没有进行荟萃分析技术,但结果进行了叙述比较。
    结果:共确定了1,658篇文章,其中符合纳入标准并被归类为高质量的2项进行最终分析。纳入的研究代表了总共2,404名患者,其中678例进行了干预以控制焦点(28.20%)。在第一项研究中,接受干预以控制焦点的患者的28天死亡率较低(12.3%vs.22.5%;P<0.001),调整后的HR为0.538(95%CI:0.389-0.744;P<0.001)。在第二个,结果表明,从患者首次接受评估并达到血流动力学稳定的时间,直到手术开始与60天的生存率相关,OR为0.31(95%CI:0.19-0.45;P<0.0001).事实上,每延迟一小时的校正OR为0.29(95%CI:0.16-0.47;P<0.0001)。因此,如果干预是在60天的2小时之前进行的,98%的病人还活着,如果在2-4小时之间执行,则减少到78%,如果在4-6小时之间,则下降到55%,但如果超过6小时,60天就不会有幸存者。
    结论:本综述显示,在对参加ED的患者进行评估后进行的来源控制可降低短期死亡率(30-60天),建议尽快实施任何所需的来源控制干预措施,最好提前(6小时内)。
    OBJECTIVE: The term source (or focus) control encompasses all those physical measures that can be used to reduce the inoculum and modify those factors in the infectious medium that promote microbial growth or foreign antimicrobial defenses of the host. The main objective of this systematic review (SR) is to know and compare whether early detection and control of the focus (in less than 6 hours) in adult patients treated in the ED for severe infection or sepsis, compared to not controlling the focus or delayed focus control (more than 12 hours) is more effective and safer (improves clinical evolution, mortality, complications, hospital stay or need for ICU admission).
    METHODS: A systematic review is carried out following the PRISMA regulations in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2000 to December 31, 2023 without language restrictions and using a combination of MESH terms: \"Source Control\", \"Early\" \"Infection OR Bacterial Infection OR Sepsis\", \"Emergencies OR Emergency OR Emergency Department\" and \"Adults\". Observational cohort studies were included. No meta-analysis techniques were performed, but results were compared narratively.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,658 articles were identified, of which 2 that met the inclusion criteria and were classified as high quality were finally analyzed. The included studies represent a total of 2,404 patients with 678 cases in which an intervention was performed to control the focus (28.20%). In the first study, 28-day mortality was lower in patients who underwent an intervention to control the focus (12.3% vs. 22.5%; P <0.001), with an adjusted HR of 0.538 (95% CI: 0.389-0.744; P<0.001). In the second, it was demonstrated that the time elapsed from when the patient was evaluated for the first time and was hemodynamically stabilized, until the start of surgery was associated with his survival at 60 days with an OR of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.19-0.45; P <0.0001). In fact, for each hour of delay an adjusted OR of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.16-0.47; P<0.0001) is established. So if the intervention is performed before 2 hours at 60 days, 98% of the patients are still alive, if it is performed between 2-4 hours it is reduced to 78%, if it is between 4-6 hours it drops to 55%, but if it is done for more than 6 hours there will be no survivors at 60 days.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that source control carried out after the evaluation of patients attending the ED reduces short-term mortality (30-60 days) and that it would be advisable to implement any required source control intervention as soon as possible, ideally early (within 6 hours).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这篇叙述性综述探讨了成人CRS管理的替代非抗生素抗菌药物。
    方法:选择使用EPOS2020指南作为参考的替代抗菌药物,以及2003年至2022年的英文文章,葡萄牙语,或使用PubMed和EMBASE数据库的西班牙语。分析的参数包括研究设计,证据水平,人口特征,CRS特性,干预措施,结果,样本量,随机化,盲法,和副作用。评论,不相关的上下文,体外实验,并排除重复项。
    结果:共筛选了148篇文章;选择了19篇文章进行分析。纳入评估非抗生素抗微生物治疗CRS的随机对照试验和队列研究。木糖醇在减少CRS症状方面表现出有效性,特别是SNOT-22的分数,超越盐水灌溉的好处。麦卢卡蜂蜜在顽固性CRS中显示出潜在的微生物益处,但症状和内镜下的改善仍无定论.婴儿洗发水冲洗改善鼻黏膜纤毛清除和术后预后。胶体银鼻腔冲洗在减少CRS症状或内窥镜评分方面显示出有限的功效。聚维酮-碘(PI)鼻腔冲洗产生混合结果,对文化消极情绪和SNOT-20得分有不同的影响。噬菌体治疗在降低特定细菌菌株和细胞因子水平方面显示出希望。
    结论:非抗生素抗菌治疗,包括木糖醇,manuka蜂蜜,婴儿洗发水,胶体银,PI,噬菌体,乳铁蛋白,和角叉菜胶为成人患者的CRS提供了潜在的替代方案。木糖醇,婴儿洗发水,PI在改善症状和鼻内镜评分方面表现出益处,然而,结论性建议和安全性评估的研究数量有限.CRS管理应采取综合办法,特别是对于非传染性或免疫相关病例,超越抗生素抗生素应保留用于确认的细菌感染。总的来说,这篇综述显示了探索非抗生素疗法以加强CRS管理的重要性.
    OBJECTIVE: This narrative review explores alternative non-antibiotic antimicrobial agents for CRS management in adults.
    METHODS: Alternative antimicrobial agents using EPOS 2020 guidelines as reference were selected, and articles dated from 2003 to 2022 in English, Portuguese, or Spanish using PubMed and EMBASE databases. The parameters analyzed included study design, evidence level, population characteristics, CRS characteristics, interventions, outcomes, sample size, randomization, blinding, and side effects. Reviews, unrelated contexts,in vitro experiments, and duplicates were excluded.
    RESULTS: 148 articles were screened; 19 articles were selected for analysis. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies assessing non-antibiotic antimicrobial treatments for CRS were included. Xylitol demonstrated effectiveness in reducing CRS symptoms, particularly SNOT-22 scores, surpassing saline irrigation benefits. Manuka honey showed potential microbiological benefits in recalcitrant CRS, but symptomatic and endoscopic improvements remained inconclusive. Baby shampoo irrigation improved nasal mucociliary clearance and postoperative outcomes. Colloidal silver nasal irrigation showed limited efficacy in reducing CRS symptoms or endoscopic scores. Povidone-Iodine (PI) nasal irrigation yielded mixed results, with varying effects on culture negativity and SNOT-20 scores. Bacteriophage treatment exhibited promise in decreasing specific bacterial strains and cytokine levels.
    CONCLUSIONS: Non-antibiotic antimicrobial therapies, including xylitol, manuka honey, baby shampoo, colloidal silver, PI, bacteriophages, lactoferrin, and carrageenan offer potential alternatives for CRS in adult patients. Xylitol, baby shampoo, and PI presented benefits in improving symptoms and nasal endoscopic scores, however, the number of studies is limited for conclusive recommendations and safety assessments. CRS management should adopt a comprehensive approach, particularly for non-infectious or immune-related cases, moving beyond antibiotics. Antibiotics should be reserved for confirmed bacterial infections. Overall, this review shows the importance of exploring non-antibiotic therapies to enhance the management of CRS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估通用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦与品牌头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(Sulperazon)治疗细菌感染的临床疗效和安全性。搜索是在PubMed进行的,Embase,科克伦图书馆,CNKI,万方,VIP数据库,和临床试验数据库,纳入11项研究,包括7项随机对照试验(RCTs)和4项回顾性队列研究(RCSs).RCT的荟萃分析表明临床成功率没有统计学差异,临床治愈率,微生物根除率,以及普通头孢哌酮/舒巴坦和品牌版本之间的不良反应发生率。RCS的结果与RCT的结果一致,证明头孢哌酮/舒巴坦的通用版本在治疗细菌感染方面在疗效和安全性上与其品牌对应物相同。
    This study aim to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam compared to the branded cefoperazone/sulbactam (Sulperazon) in treating bacterial infections through a meta-analysis. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP databases, and Clinical Trials database, resulting in the inclusion of 11 studies comprising 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective cohort studies (RCSs). Meta-analysis of the RCTs indicated no statistical differences in clinical success rates, clinical cure rates, microbiological eradication rates, and incidence of adverse reactions between the generic cefoperazone/sulbactam and the branded version. Findings from the RCSs aligned with those from the RCTs, demonstrating that generic versions of cefoperazone/sulbactam are equivalent in efficacy and safety to their branded counterparts in treating bacterial infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:一些数据,主要来自动物研究,建议低葡萄糖摄入对细菌性败血症有保护作用,但对压倒性的病毒感染有害。这已被解释为广泛的信念,即不同形式的败血症可能可能需要不同的营养管理策略。宿主与病毒和细菌的相互作用之间存在一些机制差异,这可以解释为什么在感染状态下可能会对大量营养素和微量营养素产生相反的反应。这里,我们旨在回顾各种感染性综合征营养管理策略的机制和病理生理学的相关证据,并总结其临床意义。
    结果:在SARS-CoV-19大流行的背景下,较新的文献提供了对病毒感染的一些见解。在感染期间,仍然存在有限的临床适用数据,这些数据清楚地描述了在活跃的病毒与细菌感染期间营养的作用。根据不同病毒和细菌模型的对比发现,大量营养素和微量营养素的需求可能更多地取决于特定的感染性生物,这些生物可能无法推广为细菌和病毒。总的来说,脓毒症的代谢作用取决于环境,和各种特定于宿主的(例如,年龄,基线营养状况,免疫状态,合并症)和疾病变量(阶段,持续时间,和疾病的严重程度)除了病原体特异性(病毒或细菌或真菌以及合并感染)因素外,在确定结果方面也起着重要作用。微生物疗法(益生菌和益生元)似乎在病毒和细菌感染状态下都具有治疗潜力。这似乎是一个有希望进一步实践研究的领域。
    Some data, mostly originally derived from animal studies, suggest that low glucose intake is protective in bacterial sepsis but detrimental in overwhelming viral infections. This has been interpreted into a broad belief that different forms of sepsis may potentially require different nutritional management strategies. There are a few mechanistic differences between the host interactions with virus and bacteria which can explain why there may be opposing responses to macronutrient and micronutrient during the infected state. Here, we aim to review relevant evidence on the mechanisms and pathophysiology of nutritional management strategies in various infectious syndromes and summarize their clinical implications.
    Newer literature - in the context of the SARS-CoV-19 pandemic - offers some insight to viral infections. There is still limited clinically applicable data during infection that clearly delineate the role of nutrition during an active viral vs bacterial infections. Based on contrasting findings in different models of viruses and bacteria, the macronutrient and micronutrient needs may depend more on specific infectious organisms that may not be generalizable as bacterial versus viral. Overall, the metabolic effects of sepsis are context dependent, and various host-specific (e.g., age, baseline nutritional status, immune status, comorbidities) and illness variables (phase, duration, and severity of illness) play a significant role in determining the outcome besides pathogen-specific (virus or bacterial or fungi and combined infections) factors. Microbe therapy (probiotics and prebiotics) seems to have therapeutic potential in both viral and bacterial infected states, and this seems like a promising area for further practical research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:对不坚持抗结核(TB)治疗的负担知之甚少。一种是早期停药,也就是说,尽早停止治疗。鉴于早期停药对治疗结果的影响,我们进行了系统的审查,以估计其负担,使用后续损失时机(LFU)作为代理措施。
    方法:WebofScience,截至2021年1月14日,使用涵盖LFU的术语搜索了Embase和Medline,结核病和治疗。包括对成年人(≥18岁)的药物敏感性结核病标准方案的研究,报告了LFU(WHO定义)的时机。进行了叙事综合,并使用改编版的DownsandBlack进行了质量评估。论文按最终为LFU的人在2个月内为LFU的百分比进行分组。三组被创建:<28.3%LFU2个月,≥28.3-<38.3%,≥38.3%)。由于早期停药而错过的剂量月百分比(1)那些LFU,(2)计算所有患者。
    结果:我们发现了来自21个国家的40项相关研究。LFU的时间在国家内部和国家之间是可变的。36/40的论文(90.0%)报告了2个月结束时LFU患者的百分比。31/36研究(86.1%)报告的患者在2个月内成为LFU的百分比高于或符合预期。成为LFU的患者错过的剂量月百分比在37%至77%之间(相当于2.2-4.6个月)。在所有患者中,剂量-月遗漏的百分比介于1%和22%之间(相当于0.1-1.3个月).
    结论:在治疗的前2个月内发生LFU的患者比例高于预期。这些患者由于早期停药而错过了高百分比的剂量月治疗。促进依从性和保留患者护理的干预措施不得忽视治疗的早期几个月。
    CRD42021218636。
    The burden of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatment is poorly understood. One type is early discontinuation, that is, stopping treatment early. Given the implications of early discontinuation for treatment outcomes, we undertook a systematic review to estimate its burden, using the timing of loss to follow-up (LFU) as a proxy measure.
    Web of Science, Embase and Medline were searched up to 14 January 2021 using terms covering LFU, TB and treatment. Studies of adults (≥ 18 years) on the standard regimen for drug-sensitive TB reporting the timing of LFU (WHO definition) were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted and quality assessment undertaken using an adapted version of Downs and Black. Papers were grouped by the percentage of those who were ultimately LFU who were LFU by 2 months. Three groups were created: <28.3% LFU by 2 months, ≥28.3-<38.3%, ≥38.3%). The percentage of dose-months missed due to early discontinuation among (1) those LFU, and (2) all patients was calculated.
    We found 40 relevant studies from 21 countries. The timing of LFU was variable within and between countries. 36/40 papers (90.0%) reported the percentage of patients LFU by the end of 2 months. 31/36 studies (86.1%) reported a higher than or as expected percentage of patients becoming LFU by 2 months. The percentage of dose-months missed by patients who became LFU ranged between 37% and 77% (equivalent to 2.2-4.6 months). Among all patients, the percentage of dose-months missed ranged between 1% and 22% (equivalent to 0.1-1.3 months).
    A larger than expected percentage of patients became LFU within the first 2 months of treatment. These patients missed high percentages of dose months of treatment due to early discontinuation. Interventions to promote adherence and retain patients in care must not neglect the early months of treatment.
    CRD42021218636.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:流行病学信息对于为肺炎提供适当的经验性抗菌治疗至关重要。本研究旨在通过对日本已发表的研究进行系统回顾,阐明社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的流行病学。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:PubMed和Ichushi网络数据库(1970年1月至2022年10月)。
    方法:用英文或日文描述CAP致病微生物的临床研究,不包括成人CAP以外的肺炎研究,调查仅限于特定病原体和病例报告。
    方法:患者设置(住院与门诊),患者数量,符合CAP指南,诊断肺炎病原体的诊断标准和方法以及每种分离株的数量。对各种情况进行了荟萃分析,以测量每种病因的频率。
    结果:纳入56项研究,发现17095例CAP。在44.1%(95%CI39.7%至48.5%)中未检测到病原体。肺炎链球菌是需要住院治疗或门诊治疗的CAP的最常见原因(20.0%(95%CI17.2%至22.8%)),其次是流感嗜血杆菌(10.8%(95%CI7.3%~14.3%))和肺炎支原体(7.5%(95%CI4.6%~10.4%))。然而,当仅限于需要住院治疗的CAP时,金黄色葡萄球菌是第三常见的,为4.9%(95%CI3.9%至5.8%)。铜绿假单胞菌在住院病例中更为常见,而非典型病原体较不常见。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌占金黄色葡萄球菌的40.7%(95%CI29.0%~52.4%)。在使用PCR检测泛呼吸道病毒病原体的研究中,检测到人肠道病毒/人鼻病毒(9.4%(95%CI0%~20.5%))和其他几种呼吸道病原病毒.流行病学因方法和情况而异。
    结论:CAP的流行病学因情况而异,例如在医院和门诊设置。病毒更经常被详尽的基因搜索发现,导致流行病学的显著差异。
    OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological information is essential in providing appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for pneumonia. This study aimed to clarify the epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) by conducting a systematic review of published studies in Japan.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: PubMed and Ichushi web database (January 1970 to October 2022).
    METHODS: Clinical studies describing pathogenic micro-organisms in CAP written in English or Japanese, excluding studies on pneumonia other than adult CAP, investigations limited to specific pathogens and case reports.
    METHODS: Patient setting (inpatient vs outpatient), number of patients, concordance with the CAP guidelines, diagnostic criteria and methods for diagnosing pneumonia pathogens as well as the numbers of each isolate. A meta-analysis of various situations was performed to measure the frequency of each aetiological agent.
    RESULTS: Fifty-six studies were included and 17 095 cases of CAP were identified. Pathogens were undetectable in 44.1% (95% CI 39.7% to 48.5%). Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common cause of CAP requiring hospitalisation or outpatient care (20.0% (95% CI 17.2% to 22.8%)), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (10.8% (95% CI 7.3% to 14.3%)) and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (7.5% (95% CI 4.6% to 10.4%)). However, when limited to CAP requiring hospitalisation, Staphylococcus aureus was the third most common at 4.9% (95% CI 3.9% to 5.8%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more frequent in hospitalised cases, while atypical pathogens were less common. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus accounted for 40.7% (95% CI 29.0% to 52.4%) of S. aureus cases. In studies that used PCR testing for pan-respiratory viral pathogens, human enterovirus/human rhinovirus (9.4% (95% CI 0% to 20.5%)) and several other respiratory pathogenic viruses were detected. The epidemiology varied depending on the methodology and situation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of CAP varies depending on the situation, such as in the hospital versus outpatient setting. Viruses are more frequently detected by exhaustive genetic searches, resulting in a significant variation in epidemiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗菌素耐药性的全球流行率不断上升构成了严重威胁,引起人们对其对公共卫生影响的担忧。这种困境是加剧了新的抗微生物剂的严重短缺,稀缺归因于细菌耐药性的快速激增。这篇综述深入探讨了抗菌肽的领域,各种各样的化合物普遍存在于各种天然生物的植物和动物中。以其固有的抗菌活性而闻名,这些肽为解决细菌耐药性的复杂挑战提供了有希望的途径。然而,基于肽的药物的临床效用受到有限的生物利用度和对快速降解的敏感性的阻碍,限制了提高细菌感染治疗疗效的努力。纳米载体的出现标志着一种变革性方法,有望彻底改变肽递送策略。这篇综述阐明了抗菌肽领域中涉及纳米载体的有前途的框架。这种范例通过检测微环境因素的动态变化,能够在感染部位进行细致和受控的肽释放。包括pH值,ROS,GSH,和反应性酶。此外,对未来的一瞥揭示了有针对性的交付机制的潜力,利用炎症反应和复杂的信号通路,包括三磷酸腺苷,巨噬细胞受体,和致病性核酸实体。这种方法有希望加强豁免权,从而放大了基于肽的治疗的效力。总之,这篇综述聚焦肽纳米系统作为对抗细菌感染的前瞻性解决方案。通过将抗菌肽与先进的纳米医学连接起来,一个新的治疗时代出现了,准备直面抗菌素耐药性的巨大挑战。
    The escalating global prevalence of antimicrobial resistance poses a critical threat, prompting concerns about its impact on public health. This predicament is exacerbated by the acute shortage of novel antimicrobial agents, a scarcity attributed to the rapid surge in bacterial resistance. This review delves into the realm of antimicrobial peptides, a diverse class of compounds ubiquitously present in plants and animals across various natural organisms. Renowned for their intrinsic antibacterial activity, these peptides provide a promising avenue to tackle the intricate challenge of bacterial resistance. However, the clinical utility of peptide-based drugs is hindered by limited bioavailability and susceptibility to rapid degradation, constraining efforts to enhance the efficacy of bacterial infection treatments. The emergence of nanocarriers marks a transformative approach poised to revolutionize peptide delivery strategies. This review elucidates a promising framework involving nanocarriers within the realm of antimicrobial peptides. This paradigm enables meticulous and controlled peptide release at infection sites by detecting dynamic shifts in microenvironmental factors, including pH, ROS, GSH, and reactive enzymes. Furthermore, a glimpse into the future reveals the potential of targeted delivery mechanisms, harnessing inflammatory responses and intricate signaling pathways, including adenosine triphosphate, macrophage receptors, and pathogenic nucleic acid entities. This approach holds promise in fortifying immunity, thereby amplifying the potency of peptide-based treatments. In summary, this review spotlights peptide nanosystems as prospective solutions for combating bacterial infections. By bridging antimicrobial peptides with advanced nanomedicine, a new therapeutic era emerges, poised to confront the formidable challenge of antimicrobial resistance head-on.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号