Anabolic bone agents, such as parathyroid hormone receptor agonists (teriparatide and abaloparatide) and sclerostin-inhibiting monoclonal antibody (romosozumab), are superior at preventing clinically significant fractures and/or vertebral fractures in women with and without severe osteoporosis compared with bisphosphonates.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates and denosumab increase bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporosis treatment in patients with aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL). This study aimed to directly compare bisphosphonates with denosumab in treating patients with AIBL and to determine the effect of denosumab on the trabecular bone score (TBS).
METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with AIBL receiving osteoporosis treatment (21 in the bisphosphonates group and 18 in the denosumab group) were retrospectively evaluated for changes in lumbar spine and femoral BMD, lumbar spine bone quality (assessed by TBS), and blood bone metabolic markers. The Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical evaluation.
RESULTS: After 24 months of treatment, the lumbar spine BMD change rate was 5.82 ± 1.10% with bisphosphonates and 10.49 ± 1.20% with denosumab, with the change rate of denosumab significantly increasing over that of bisphosphonates. The change rate in femoral BMD was 2.69 ± 1.16% with bisphosphonates and 2.95 ± 1.26% with denosumab, with no significant difference between the two groups. The rate of decrease in tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b was significantly higher in the denosumab group. The change rate in TBS at 24 months of treatment was 0.53 ± 1.26% in the bisphosphonates group and 1.08 ± 1.33% in the denosumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups. After 24 months, TBS remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS: Both bisphosphonates and denosumab may increase BMD, improve bone metabolism, and inhibit bone quality loss in patients with AIBL.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the eighth most common cancer in women, with poor survival outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that nitrogen-based bisphosphonate (NBB) use may be associated with reduced risk of EOC, particularly the endometrioid and serous histotypes; however, confounding by indication is a concern. An alternative approach to investigate the chemo-preventive potential of NBBs is to emulate a target trial by identifying all women who initiate use of NBBs and investigate the risk of EOC for continued users compared with discontinued users.
METHODS: Using population-based linked data, we identified all Australian women aged over 50 years who first used NBBs over 2004-12. We used the year after first use to define treatment for each woman as either continued or discontinued use. We emulated randomization using stabilized inverse probability weights to balance the treatment groups using covariates including age, comorbidities and socioeconomic status. We followed women from treatment assignment until EOC diagnosis, death or 31 December 2013. We assessed the risk of EOC (overall and by histotype) using flexible parametric time-to-event models allowing for time-varying effects, and produced time-varying coefficients.
RESULTS: Of the 313 383 women in the study, 472 were diagnosed with EOC during follow-up (261 serous EOC), with an average age at diagnosis of 72 years. Continued use of NBBs was associated with reduced risk of EOC overall (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), and serous EOC (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96), compared with discontinued treatment, with estimates remaining constant over the 9-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from our emulated trial suggest that in women who initiated NBB treatment, those who continued use had 13% and 29% lower hazards of being diagnosed with EOC overall and serous EOC, respectively, compared with women who discontinued use.

BACKGROUND: Several small genetic association studies have been conducted for atypical femur fracture (AFF) without replication of results. We assessed previously implicated and novel genes associated with AFFs in a larger set of unrelated AFF cases using whole exome sequencing (WES).
METHODS: We performed gene-based association analysis on 139 European AFF cases and 196 controls matched for bisphosphonate use. We tested all rare, protein-altering variants using both candidate gene and hypothesis-free approaches. In the latter, genes suggestively associated with AFFs (uncorrected P-values <0.01) were investigated in a Swedish whole-genome sequencing replication study and assessed in 46 non-European cases.
RESULTS: In the candidate gene analysis, PLOD2 showed a suggestive signal. The hypothesis-free approach revealed 10 tentative associations, with XRN2, SORD, and PLOD2 being the most likely candidates for AFF. XRN2 and PLOD2 showed consistent direction of effect estimates in the replication analysis, albeit not statistically significant. Three SNPs associated with SORD expression according to the GTEx portal, were in linkage disequilibrium (R2 ≥ 0.2) with a SNP previously reported in a genome-wide association study of AFF. The prevalence of carriers of variants for both PLOD2 and SORD was higher in Asian versus European cases.
CONCLUSIONS: While we did not identify genes enriched for damaging variants, we found suggestive evidence of a role for XRN2, PLOD2 and SORD, which requires further investigation. Our findings indicate that genetic factors responsible for AFFs are not widely shared among AFF cases. The study provides a stepping-stone for future larger genetic studies of AFF.
We investigated the genetic factors contributing to atypical femur fractures (AFF), which are rare and unusual fractures in the thigh bone These fractures are related to the use of bisphosphonates, which are prescribed to prevent fractures caused by osteoporosis. Previous studies suggested potential genetic links, but their findings were not confirmed in larger groups. To address this, we analyzed genetic data from 139 European individuals with AFF and 196 individuals without AFF, all of whom used bisphosphonates, using a genetic technique called whole exome sequencing (WES). Our results suggested three genes—XRN2, SORD, and PLOD2—might be linked to AFF, although the evidence was not conclusive. Importantly, our findings suggest that AFF may be caused by different genes in different individuals. A much larger sample size is now needed to fully understand the genetic architecture of AFF. These findings may guide future research into the genetic causes of AFF.

OBJECTIVE: Previous evidence suggests that bisphosphonates (BPs) may lower the risk of recurrent fractures and enhance functional recovery in patients with fractures. However, there has been controversy regarding the optimal timing of treatment initiation for patients with fragility fractures. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the available evidence on the use of BPs during the perioperative period and compared it to both non-perioperative periods and non-usage.
METHODS: Electronic searches were performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library published before February 2023, without any language restrictions. The primary outcomes included fracture healing rate, healing time, and new fractures. We also examined a wide range of secondary outcomes. Random effects meta-analysis was used.
RESULTS: A total of 19 clinical trials involving 2543 patients were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing patients with non-perioperative BPs use in 4-6 weeks and approximately 10-12 weeks post-surgically, the overall risk ratios (RRs) of perioperative BPs use for healing rate were 1.06 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.38, p=0.69) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.11, p=0.65), respectively, suggesting no difference in healing rate between perioperative and non-perioperative BP initiation. For healing time, the overall mean difference between perioperative and non-perioperative periods was -0.19 week (95% CI: -1.03, 0.64, p=0.65) at approximately 10-12 weeks, indicating no significant impact of perioperative BP initiation on healing time. In terms of new fractures, the overall RR with BP use was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.17-0.73, p=0.005), when compared to patients without BPs use. This suggests a protective impact of BP use against new fractures compared to patients without BP use. Perioperative BP use was associated with a markedly higher likelihood of having adverse experiences, including fever (RR: 23.78, 95% CI: 8.29, 68.21, p< 0.001), arthralgia (RR: 10.20, 95% CI: 2.41, 43.16, p=0.002), and myalgia (RR: 9.42, 95% CI: 2.54, 34.87, p< 0.001), compared with non-BPs use.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BP during the perioperative period does not affect the healing process and has positive effects on therapy for patients with fragility fractures. These compelling findings underscore the potential efficacy of BP use during the perioperative period as a viable treatment option for patients with fragility fractures.

The clinical course and treatment of hypercalcemia from a granulomatous disease in the setting of an infectious etiology, namely disseminated coccidioidomycosis, remains incompletely understood. The mechanism and treatment of hypercalcemia have been documented in most granulomatous disorders, with sarcoidosis being the most well-understood so far. We discuss a case of a patient with a recent diagnosis of disseminated coccidioidomycosis who presented with hypercalcemia despite adequate infection control. The treatment course involved combinatorial-calcitonin, low-dose bisphosphonates, and corticosteroids, which led to a favorable outcome.

暂无摘要。

The raising number of older patients who are diagnosed with breast cancer represents a significant medical and societal challenge. Aromatase inhibitors (AI), which are commonly utilized to treat this condition in these patients have significant adverse events on bone and muscle health. Falling estrogen production leads to an increase in RANKL secretion by osteoblasts with accelerated bone remodeling due to osteoclast activity. Furthermore, estrogen deficiency reduces skeletal muscle strength and mass. The humanized monoclonal antibody, denosumab, neutralizes RANKL, thereby inhibiting osteoclast formation, function and survival and ultimately exerting powerful anti-resorptive effects.. In this study, we report on the efficacy of denosumab in mitigating aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss (AIBL) and sarcopenia in older women with breast cancer. From January 2022 to January 2023, we enrolled 30 patients (female sex, ≥ 65 years) diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy; patients received, as per clinical practice, primary bone prophylaxis with denosumab (60 mg via subcutaneous injection every 6 months) according to oncologic guidelines. This group was matched with 30 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, who were treated with biphosphonates (BF) therapy (oral alendronate 70 mg/week). For each patient bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality in terms of trabecular bone score (TBS) in addition to body composition and Relative Skeletal Muscle Index (RSMI) was assessed by bone densitometry at baseline and after one year of treatment. Significant improvements in TBS at the lumbar spine, RSMI and whole-body composition (arms, legs, and trunk) were observed in the denosumab group compared with the BF group. These findings underscore the role of denosumab as an effective strategy in managing AIBL and osteosarcopenia in older women with breast cancer and undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy, which is crucial for improving quality of life, preventing functional decline, and optimizing treatment outcomes.

Bisphosphonates are widely used for a number of metabolic bone conditions. Orbital inflammation is a very rare side effect of bisphosphonate therapy that can risk permanent visual loss. We describe the complex case and successful treatment of a 79-year-old man who developed orbital cellulitis following the use of intravenous pamidronate disodium for severe hypercalcaemia. The challenges regarding the diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma are also discussed.

OBJECTIVE: While adjuvant bisphosphonate use in early breast cancer (EBC) is associated with improvements in breast cancer-specific outcomes, questions remain around optimal bisphosphonate type, dose and scheduling. We evaluated a single zoledronate infusion in a prospective randomised trial.
METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with EBC were randomised to receive a single infusion of zoledronate (4 mg IV) or 6-monthly treatment for 3 years. Outcomes measured were; Quality of Life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L), bisphosphonate-related toxicities, including acute phase reactions (APRs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: 211 patients were randomized to either a single infusion (n = 107) or six-monthly treatment (n = 104). After 3 years of follow up there were no significant differences between the arms for QoL and most toxicity endpoints. APRs following zoledronate occurred in 81% (171/211) of patients (77.6% in single infusion arm and 84.6% in the 6-monthly group). While the frequency of APRs decreased over 3 years in the 6-monthly arm, they still remain common. Of 34/104 (32.7%) patients who discontinued zoledronate early in the 6-monthly treatment group, the most common reason was APRs (16/34, 47%). At the 3 year follow up, there were no differences between arms for RFS, BMFS or OS.
CONCLUSIONS: A single infusion of zoledronate was associated with increased patient convenience, less toxicity, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation. Despite the common clinical impression that APRs decrease with time, this was not observed when patients were specifically questioned. While the study is not powered for non-inferiority, longer-term follow-up for confirmation of RFS and OS rates is ongoing.