UNASSIGNED: Previously, we reported that antiemetics (droperidol and/or dexamethasone) could significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic gynecological surgery (LGS). We retrospectively investigated anesthesia practice during the era earlier than the above-mentioned report to identify factors affecting PONV.
UNASSIGNED: We investigated 1,221 patients who underwent LGS at Juntendo University Hospital between 2007 and 2009. Effects of nine covariates likely to affect PONV on the actual incidence of PONV were examined with the multivariate logistic regression analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The actual incidence of PONV developing until nine hours after the transfer to the ward was 47.3% (577/1,221) in the total cohort. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that longer duration of anesthesia (in hours) was associated with the increased incidence of PONV (odds ratio [OR], 1.170; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.000-1.360; p = 0.0467), the use of the reversal agent neostigmine co-administrated with atropine was associated with the lower incidence of PONV (OR, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.585-0.950; p = 0.0177), and no use of PCA and the use of fentanyl PCA without droperidol were associated with the higher incidence of PONV, compared with the use of fentanyl PCA with droperidol (OR, 1.810; 95% CI, 1.250-2.640; p = 0.0019; and OR, 2.500; 95% CI, 1.880-3.310; p < 0.0001; respectively).
UNASSIGNED: Longer duration of anesthesia was associated with the increased incidence of PONV. Addition of droperidol to the PCA infusate and the use of reversal agent neostigmine co-administrated with atropine were associated with the reduced incidence of PONV.

Background and Objectives: Myopia is the most widespread ocular disorder globally and its prevalence has been increasing over the past decades. Atropine eye drops stand out as the only pharmacological intervention used in clinical practice to control myopia progression. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of 0.01% atropine eye drops on myopia progression. Patients and Methods: Healthy children aged 6-12 years with cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) from -0.5 D to -5.0 D and astigmatism ≤1.5 D were included. Myopia progression was assessed by changes in SE and axial length (AL) over 1 year and SE changes 1 year before the study enrollment and during the 1-year follow-up. Adverse events were evaluated based on complaints reported by either parents or the children themselves during follow-up visits. Results: The analysis involved 55 patients in the 0.01% atropine eye drops group and 66 in the control group. After the 1-year follow-up, the change in SE was -0.50 (-2.25-0.50) D in the control group compared to -0.50 (-1.50-0.50) D in the 0.01% atropine group (p = 0.935); AL change was 0.31 (0.18) mm in the control group and 0.29 (0.18) mm in the 0.01% atropine group (p = 0.480). The change in SE was -0.68 (-2.0--0.25) D/year before the study and remained similar -0.50 (-2.25-0.25) D over the 1-year follow-up in the control group (p = 0.111); SE change was reduced from -1.01 (-2.0--0.25) D/year before the study to -0.50 (-1.5-0.5) D over the 1-year follow-up in the 0.01% atropine group (p < 0.001). In the 0.01% atropine group, ten (16.4%) children experienced mild adverse events, including blurred near vision, ocular discomfort, photophobia, dry eyes, and anisocoria. Conclusions: Compared to the control group, the administration of 0.01% atropine eye drops demonstrated no significant effect on changes in SE and AL over a 1-year follow-up. However, children in the 0.01% atropine group initially experienced higher myopia progression, which decreased with treatment over the course of 1 year. Future studies should explore the long-term effects, rebound effects, potential genetic associations, and efficacy of higher doses of atropine in managing myopia progression.

This study explored the impact of short-term coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions on the efficacy of atropine 0.01% eyedrops on myopia control in a multiethnic cohort of Australian children. In the Western Australia Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia study, 104 and 49 children were randomized to receive atropine 0.01% eyedrops and a placebo, respectively. We compared the 1-year myopia progression and axial elongation following the 2-month lockdown in 2020 to the same months in 2019 and 2021, i.e., the 1-year myopia progression up to May 2019-October 2019 (non-COVID-19) versus the 1-year progression up to May 2020-October 2020 (COVID-19 period), and the 1-year progression up to May 2021-October 2021 (non-COVID-19) versus the 1-year progression up to the same months in 2020. After excluding participants who withdrew, completed their treatment phase prior May 2020, or those whose study visits did not fall between May 2020 and October 2020, 65 participants (mean age at baseline = 11.8 ± 2.5 years) were included in the final analysis (49 in the treatment group; 16 in the placebo group). After correcting for age, sex, and ethnicity, there was no significant main effect of the short-term lockdown on the rate of spherical equivalent or axial length change. However, there was a lockdown × treatment interaction effect on the rate of axial elongation (P = 0.007). This was such that in the treatment group, the 1-year axial elongation was faster during lockdown by 0.056 mm compared to the nonlockdown periods (P = 0.009), while the rate of axial elongation in those on the placebo eye drops was similar during lockdown and nonlockdown. Our findings suggest that there is a decreased efficacy of low-concentration atropine even with relatively lenient restrictions lasting for a few months.

UNASSIGNED: Exotropia and myopia are commonly coexistent. However, evidence is limited regarding atropine interventions for myopia control in children with myopia and intermittent exotropia (IXT).
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine eye drops on myopia progression, exotropia conditions, and binocular vision in individuals with myopia and IXT.
UNASSIGNED: This placebo-controlled, double-masked, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2020 to September 2023. Children aged 6 to 12 years with basic-type IXT and myopia of -0.50 to -6.00 diopters (D) after cycloplegic refraction in both eyes were enrolled.
UNASSIGNED: Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to 0.01% atropine or placebo eye drops administered in both eyes once at night for 12 months.
UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent from baseline at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included change in axial length (AL), accommodative amplitude (AA), exotropia conditions, and binocular vision at 1 year.
UNASSIGNED: Among 323 screened participants, 300 children (mean [SD] age, 9.1 [1.6] years; 152 male [50.7%]) were included in this study. A total of 200 children (66.7%) were in the atropine group, and 100 (33.3%) were in the placebo group. At 1 year, the 0.01% atropine group had slower spherical equivalent progression (-0.51 D vs -0.75 D; difference = 0.24 D; 95% CI, 0.11-0.37 D; P < .001) and AL elongation (0.31 mm vs 0.42 mm; difference = -0.11 mm; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.06 mm; P < .001) than the placebo group. The mean AA change was -3.06 D vs 0.12 D (difference = -3.18 D; 95% CI, -3.92 to -2.44 D; P < .001) in the atropine and placebo groups, respectively. The 0.01% atropine group had a decrease in near magnitude of exodeviation whereas the placebo group had an increase (-1.25 prism diopters [PD] vs 0.74 PD; difference = -1.99 PD; 95% CI, -3.79 to -0.19 PD; P = .03). In the atropine vs placebo group, respectively, the incidence of study drug-related photophobia was 6.0% (12 of 200 participants) vs 8.0% (8 of 100 participants; difference = -2.0%; 95% CI, -9.4% to 3.7%; P = .51) and for blurred near vision was 6.0% (12 of 200 participants) vs 7.0% (7 of 100 participants) (difference = -1.0%; 95% CI, -8.2% to 4.5%; P = .74).
UNASSIGNED: The findings of this randomized clinical trial support use of 0.01% atropine eye drops, although compromising AA to some extent, for slowing myopia progression without interfering with exotropia conditions or binocular vision in children with myopia and IXT.
UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000039827.

BACKGROUND: Myopia, characterized by excessive axial elongation of the eyeball, increases risks of having sight-threatening diseases and impose a financial burden to healthcare system. Although myopic control interventions showed their effectiveness in slowing progression, the efficacy varies between individuals and does not completely halt progression. The study aims to investigate the efficacy of combining 0.01% atropine administered twice daily with optical defocus for myopia control in schoolchildren.
METHODS: This is a prospective, parallel-group, single-blinded, randomized, active-control trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06358755). Myopic schoolchildren with no previous myopic control interventions aged between 7 to 12 years will be recruited. They will be randomly allocated into two groups (n = 56 per group) after baseline measurement. Both groups will receive 0.01% atropine twice per day for 18 months (one drop in the morning and the other drop at night before bedtime). Defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses will be prescribed in atropine plus optical defocus (ATD) treatment group while single vision spectacle lenses will be given in atropine only (AT) group. Cycloplegic refraction and axial lengths will be monitored every 6 months over 18-month study period. The primary outcomes are changes in cycloplegic refraction and axial lengths relative to the baseline over the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: The result will examine the combination effect of low dose atropine and myopic defocus on myopia control in a randomized controlled study. The findings will also explore the potential benefits of applying 0.01% atropine twice per day on myopic control and its potential side effects.

It aims to study the efficacy and safety of low-concentration Atropine combined with orthokeratology (OK) lens in delaying juvenile myopia. This is a prospective study, 172 adolescents aged 8 to 12 years who were admitted to the diopter department of Hengshui People Hospital from April 2021 to May 2022 were selected. According to the equivalent spherical diopter measured at the time of initial diagnosis, myopic patients were randomly divided into low myopia group (group A) and moderate myopia group (group B). At the same time, according to the different treatment methods, the patients were divided into the group wearing frame glasses alone (group c), the group wearing frame glasses with low-concentration Atropine (group d), the group wearing corneal shaping glasses alone at night (group e), and the group wearing corneal shaping glasses at night with low-concentration Atropine (group f). The control effect of myopia development and axial elongation in group f was better than that in groups d and e (P < .05). The effect of controlling myopia development and axial elongation in group f is with P > .05. The probability of postoperative adverse reactions in group f was lower and lower than that in the other groups. Low-concentration atropine combined with OK lens could effectively delay the development of juvenile myopia, and had a high safety. Low-concentration of Atropine would not have a significant impact on the basic tear secretion and tear film stability. Nightwear of OK lens also had no significant impact, but it would significantly reduce the tear film rupture time in the first 3 months, and at the same time, the tear film rupture time would be the same after 6 months as before treatment.

Oculocardiac reflex (OCR), presenting as bradycardia and asystole, is a potential intraoperative complication that may occur during maxillofacial trauma surgery. Bradycardia is the most common symptom of this phenomenon. Surgeons should be aware of its long-term effects, such as arrhythmias and even cardiac arrest. We report the case of a 40-year-old male patient with a fracture of the floor of the orbit. During a surgical exploration of the orbital floor, the patient exhibited sudden symptoms of OCR. It was managed by withholding the surgery and administering atropine. The article also highlights the mechanism, types, incidence, and management of OCR in patients with maxillofacial trauma.

UNASSIGNED: Sublingual atropine is an effective treatment of clozapine-induced hypersalivation. This study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetics of atropine after sublingual and oral administration and study the dose effect of atropine on saliva secretion.
UNASSIGNED: An interventional cross-over clinical trial where participants received 0.6 mg and 1.2 mg atropine sulfate sublingual solution and 0.6 mg oral tablet. Atropine plasma concentration was measured over 9 hours with validated LC-MS/MS method. Atropine effects on saliva secretion rate, visual acuity and accommodation, and vital signs were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Four clozapine-treated and three healthy participants were enrolled in the study. The area under the atropine plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) was highest after the 1.2 mg sublingual solution administration in comparison with 0.6 mg tablet or sublingual solution (8.58±1.66 µg.L-1.h vs. 4.65±1.29 vs. 2.98±0.73 µg.L-1.h, respectively). The Cmax for the 0.6 mg and 1.2 mg sublingual solutions was 1.11±0.99 and 1.76±0.62 µg.L-1, and tmax was 2.18±0.59 and 1.9±0.71 h, respectively. In comparison with the 0.6 mg sublingual solution dose, the saliva secretion reduction was larger after the oral tablet administration (-40% (-59, -22%) vs. -69% (-80, -57)) and largest after the 1.2 mg sublingual solution administration (-79% (-93,-64)).
UNASSIGNED: Both the sublingual and oral atropine are effective in reducing the saliva secretion however at a lower plasma concentration after sublingual administration, with a dose-dependent effect. Both have significantly reduced the blood pressure and pulse rate over 3 hours without significant changes in vision. No major safety concerns were reported.

BACKGROUND: Glycopyrrolate-neostigmine (G/N) for reversing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) causes fewer changes in heart rate (HR) than atropine-neostigmine (A/N). This advantage may be especially beneficial for elderly patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the cardiovascular effects of G/N and A/N for the reversal of NMB in elderly patients.
METHODS: Elderly patients aged 65-80 years who were scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to the glycopyrrolate group (group G) or the atropine group (group A). Following the last administration of muscle relaxants for more than 30 min, group G received 4 ug/kg glycopyrrolate and 20 ug/kg neostigmine, while group A received 10 ug/kg atropine and 20 ug/kg neostigmine. HR, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and ST segment in lead II (ST-II) were measured 1 min before administration and 1-15 min after administration.
RESULTS: HR was significantly lower in group G compared to group A at 2-8 min after administration (P < 0.05). MAP was significantly lower in group G compared to group A at 1-4 min after administration (P < 0.05). ST-II was significantly depressed in group A compared to group G at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, and 15 min after administration (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to A/N, G/N for reversing residual NMB in the elderly has a more stable HR, MAP, and ST-II within 15 min after administration.

UNASSIGNED: Oculocardiac reflex (OCR) is one of the serious complications following surgical therapeutic procedures for strabismus. Various medications have been tested to prevent or mitigate this complication. We aimed to compare the effect of intravenous atropine and topical tetracaine on the incidence and severity of OCR in strabismus surgery.
UNASSIGNED: In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial study, 120 patients who were candidates for strabismus surgery were randomly assigned to receive intravenous atropine, topical tetracaine, or artificial tears as the control. The incidence of OCR and its severity along with the changes in hemodynamic conditions were compared across the groups.
UNASSIGNED: The incidence rate of OCR in the groups receiving atropine, tetracaine, and the control was found to be 17.5%, 25.0%, and 32.5% in the releasing phase without any difference, respectively (P = 0.303); however, it was 2.5%, 7.5%, and 25.0%, respectively, in the cutting phase, indicating a lower rate in the group receiving tetracaine (P = 0.004). Similarly, there was no difference in the severity of OCR across the three study groups in the releasing phase (P = 0.666); however, in the cutting phase, OCR was revealed to be milder in the group receiving atropine as compared to other groups (P = 0.033). Prescribing atropine led to higher mean systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure during surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The injection of atropine can effectively reduce the incidence of OCR during strabismus surgery and reduce its severity if this reflex occurs.