The primordial role of the CAU anticodon in methionine identity of the tRNA has been established by others nearly a decade ago in Escherichia coli and yeast tRNA(Met). We show here that the CAU triplet alone is unable to confer methionine acceptance to a tRNA. This requires the contribution of the discriminatory base A73 and the non-anticodon bases of the anticodon loop. To better understand the functional communication between the anticodon and the active site, we analysed the binding and aminoacylation of tRNA(Met) based anticodon and acceptor-stem minihelices and of tRNA(Met) chimeras where the central core region of yeast tRNA(Met) is replaced by that of unusual mitochondrial forms lacking either a D-stem or a T-stem. These studies suggest that the high selectivity of the anticodon bases in tRNA(Met) implies the L-conformation of the tRNA and the presence of a D-stem. The importance of a L-structure for recognition of tRNA(Met) was also deduced from mutations of tertiary interactions known to play a general role in tRNA(Met) folding.

Selection of the proper start codon for the synthesis of a polypeptide by the Escherichia coli translation initiation apparatus involves several macromolecular components. These macromolecules interact in a specific and concerted manner to yield the translation initiation complex. This review focuses on recent data concerning the properties of the initiator tRNA and of enzymes and factors involved in the translation initiation process. The three initiation factors, as well as methionyl-tRNA synthetase and methionyl-tRNA(f)Met formyltransferase are described. In addition, the tRNA recognition properties of EF-Tu and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase are considered. Finally, peptide deformylase and methionine aminopeptidase, which catalyze the amino terminal maturation of nascent polypeptides, can also be associated to the translation initiation process.

Inosine (6-deaminated adenosine) is a characteristic modified nucleoside that is found at the first anticodon position (position 34) of several tRNAs of eukaryotic and eubacterial origins, while N1-methylinosine is found exclusively at position 37 (3\' adjacent to the anticodon) of eukaryotic tRNA(Ala) and at position 57 (in the middle of the psi loop) of several tRNAs from halophilic and thermophilic archaebacteria. Inosine has also been recently found in double-stranded RNA, mRNA and viral RNAs. As for all other modified nucleosides in RNAs, formation of inosine and inosine derivative in these RNA is catalysed by specific enzymes acting after transcription of the RNA genes. Using recombinant tRNAs and T7-runoff transcripts of several tRNA genes as substrates, we have studied the mechanism and specificity of tRNA-inosine-forming enzymes. The results show that inosine-34 and inosine-37 in tRNAs are both synthesised by a hydrolytic deamination-type reaction, catalysed by distinct tRNA:adenosine deaminases. Recognition of tRNA substrates by the deaminases does not strictly depend on a particular \"identity\' nucleotide. However, the efficiency of adenosine to inosine conversion depends on the nucleotides composition of the anticodon loop and the proximal stem as well as on 3D-architecture of the tRNA. In eukaryotic tRNA(Ala), N1-methylinosine-37 is formed from inosine-37 by a specific SAM-dependent methylase, while in the case of N1-methylinosine-57 in archaeal tRNAs, methylation of adenosine-57 into N1-methyladenosine-57 occurs before the deamination process. The T psi-branch of fragmented tRNA is the minimalist substrate for the N1-methylinosine-57 forming enzymes. Inosine-34 and N1-methylinosine-37 in human tRNA(Ala) are targets for specific autoantibodies which are present in the serum of patients with inflammatory muscle disease of the PL-12 polymyositis type. Here we discuss the mechanism, specificity and general properties of the recently discovered RNA:adenosine deaminases/editases acting on double-stranded RNA, intron-containing mRNA and viral RNA in relation to those of the deaminases acting on tRNAs.

暂无摘要。

This article is an update of our earlier review (Lacey and Mullins, 1983) in this journal on the origin of the genetic code and the process of protein synthesis. It is our intent to discuss only experimental evidence published since then although there is the necessity to mention the old enough to place the new in context. We do not include theoretical nor hypothetical treatments of the code or protein synthesis. Relevant data regarding the evolution of tRNAs and the recognition of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases are discussed. Our present belief is that the code arose based on a core of early assignments which were made on a physico-chemical and anticodonic basis and this was expanded with new assignments later. These late assignments do not necessarily show an amino acid-anticodon relatedness. In spite of the fact that most data suggest a code origin based on amino acid-anticodon relationships, some new data suggesting preferential binding of Arg to its codons are discussed. While information regarding coding is not increasing very rapidly, information regarding the basic chemistry of the process of protein synthesis has increased significantly, principally relating to aminoacylation of mono- and polyribonucleotides. Included in those studies are several which show stereoselective reactions of L-amino acids with nucleotides having D-sugars. Hydrophobic interactions definitely play a role in the preferences which have been observed.