Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

前交叉韧带损伤
  • DOI:
    文章类型: Systematic Review
    女运动员前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的风险增加。激素变化对女性ACL损伤风险的影响仍然不明确。最近的数据表明,降解胶原蛋白的月经激素松弛素可能会周期性影响女性ACL组织质量。这篇综述旨在确定月经松弛素峰值与女性ACL损伤率之间的任何相关性。
    进行了系统评价,利用MEDLINE,EMBASE,和CINAHL数据库。纳入的研究必须直接解决松弛素/女性ACL相互作用。主要结果变量是ACL的松弛素蛋白水解,在细胞,组织,接头,和整个有机体的水平。次要结果变量是任何讨论过的调节松弛素水平的方法,和临床结果,如果有的话。
    所有雌性ACL上的众多松弛素受体上调局部胶原分解并抑制局部胶原生成。峰值血清松弛素浓度(SRC)出现在月经周期第21-24天;与ACL损伤风险更大相关的时间阶段。口服避孕药(OCPs)降低SRC,具有潜在的ACL保护作用。
    松弛素峰值水平与女性ACL损伤风险增加之间存在合理的相关性和似是而非的因果关系,需要进一步调查。证据等级:III。
    UNASSIGNED: Female athletes are at increased risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The influence of hormonal variation on female ACL injury risk remains ill-defined. Recent data suggests that the collagen-degrading menstrual hormone relaxin may cyclically impact female ACL tissue quality. This review aims to identify any correlation between menstrual relaxin peaks and rates of female ACL injury.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was performed, utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Included studies had to directly address relaxin/female ACL interactions. The primary outcome variable was relaxin proteolysis of the ACL, at cellular, tissue, joint, and whole-organism levels. The secondary outcome variable was any discussed method of moderating relaxin levels, and the clinical results if available.
    UNASSIGNED: AllThe numerous relaxin receptors on female ACLs upregulate local collagenolysis and suppress local collagen production. Peak serum relaxin concentrations (SRC) occur during menstrual cycle days 21-24; a time phase associated with greater risk of ACL injury. Oral contraceptives (OCPs) reduce SRC, with a potential ACLprotective effect.
    UNASSIGNED: A reasonable correlative and plausible causative relationship exists between peak relaxin levels and increased risk of ACL injury in females, and further investigation is warranted. Level of Evidence: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:在骨科,前交叉韧带(ACL)重建是最常见的手术干预措施之一。优选地使用两种方法:来自腿筋肌腱(HT)或髌骨肌腱(PT)的自体移植物。这项荟萃分析的目的是在重返体育运动时比较这两种方法。
    方法:根据PubMed进行的文献检索,纳入了11项研究。主要结果是恢复到运动员受伤前的运动水平。术后结果如Lysholm评分,国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分,Tegner活动评分,KT-1000关节测量和自体移植物再破裂率作为次要结局进行分析.
    结果:分析显示,在两年的随访中,使用自体腿筋或髌骨移植的患者在恢复到损伤前运动水平方面没有显着差异。考虑到次要结果,Lysholm评分没有显著差异,IKDC评分或再破裂率。Tegner活动量表显示PT组的活动水平明显高于HT组(OR0.79,p=0.003)。在为期两年的随访中,KT-1000关节仪分析也显示了松弛度的显着差异,对于HT自体移植物较高(OR-0.31,p=0.02)。
    结论:本研究显示,绳肌腱和髌骨自体移植物之间没有显著差异。即便如此,ACL破裂手术方法的选择对个体来说仍然至关重要,应由患者和医师共同做出加权决定.
    BACKGROUND: In orthopaedics, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are among the most common surgical interventions. Two methods are preferably used: autografts from the hamstring tendon (HT) or patella tendon (PT). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare these two methods when returning to sports.
    METHODS: Eleven studies were included based on a literature search conducted in PubMed. The primary outcome was return to preinjury sport level in athletes. Post-operative results such as the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the Tegner Activity Score and KT-1000 arthrometry and autograft re-rupture rates were analysed as secondary outcomes.
    RESULTS: The analysis showed no significant difference in return to preinjury sports level at a two-year follow-up between patients operated with hamstring or patella autograft. Considering the secondary outcomes, no significant differences were recorded in Lysholm score, IKDC score or re-rupture rate. The Tegner Activity Scale demonstrated a significantly higher activity level in the PT group than in the HT group (OR 0.79, p = 0.003). At the two-year follow-up, the KT-1000 arthrometer analysis also showed a significant difference in laxity, which was higher for the HT autografts (OR -0.31, p = 0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no significant differences between hamstring and patella autografts. Even so, the choice of method when operated for ACL rupture remains crucial for the individual and should be a weighted decision made jointly by the patient and the physician.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)是一种常见的骨科手术程序,其发生率在过去几十年中有所增加。然而,据信,神经肌肉控制从ACLR后的早期阶段到后来的几年仍然改变.因此,这项研究的目的是系统评估单侧ACLR受试者在功能任务期间的共收缩程度.
    方法:遵循系统综述设计。搜索策略是在PubMed中进行的,Scopus,EBSCO,PEDro,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience数据库从成立到2024年3月。纳入标准涉及使用肌电图(EMG)数据通过功能任务期间ACLR个体的共收缩指数(CCI)计算肌肉对激活的研究。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选项目,使用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)研究质量评估工具评估研究质量。
    结果:搜索策略共发现792项研究,其中15人在审查了资格标准后被纳入本系统审查。共收缩的幅度在总共433个ACLR个体和206个对照中进行了评估,例如跳跃,Drap-land,升压/降压,和步态。总的来说,大约79.6%的接受过ACLR的个体表现出ACLR肢体的共收缩幅度增加,而8.5%的人表现出低的共收缩水平。
    结论:审查的结果表明,在功能性任务期间,大多数经历过ACLR的个体在受累肢体中表现出共同收缩幅度的变化。
    BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopedic surgery procedure whose incidence has increased over the past few decades. Nevertheless, it is believed that neuromuscular control remains altered from the early stages after ACLR to later years. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the magnitude of co-contraction during functional tasks in subjects with unilateral ACLR.
    METHODS: A systematic review design was followed. The search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to March 2024. The inclusion criteria involved studies using electromyography (EMG) data to calculate muscle pair activation via the co-contraction index (CCI) in ACLR individuals during functional tasks. The Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and study quality was evaluated using National Institutes of Health (NIH) Study Quality Assessment Tools.
    RESULTS: The search strategy found a total of 792 studies, of which 15 were included in this systematic review after reviewing the eligibility criteria. The magnitude of co-contraction was assessed in a total of 433 ACLR individuals and 206 controls during functional tasks such as hop, drop-land, step-up/step-down, and gait. Overall, approximately 79.6% of individuals who had undergone ACLR exhibited increased levels of co-contraction magnitude in the ACLR limb, while 8.5% showed low co-contraction levels.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the review suggest that, during functional tasks, most individuals who have undergone ACLR exhibit changes of co-contraction magnitude in the involved limb.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是不同运动项目的专业和业余运动员的主要损伤之一。每年发生成千上万的ACL破裂,只有55%的运动员恢复到竞技水平,第二次受伤的可能性要高出15倍。这些伤害中有60%发生在没有身体接触的情况下,并且由于它们发生在急性过程中,它们会引起关节积液,肌肉无力和功能丧失。从长远来看,它们可能导致骨关节炎的过早过程。这篇叙述性综述对临床医生特别感兴趣,从业者,教练和运动员了解导致受伤和/或再次受伤的主要因素,优化他们的训练,以减少和/或预防ACL损伤和/或再损伤的风险。因此,我们旨在报道围绕传播的文献的叙事概述,并通过理论回顾进行探索,ACL损伤和/或再损伤的主要危险因素,以及带来实用和正确的培训应用方法。康复和/或培训专业人员缺乏理论/实践知识可能会损害运动员和/或学生的治疗。需要能够在随机对照试验中测试不同训练方法方法的高质量研究。
    Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the main injuries in professional and amateur athletes of different sports. Hundreds of thousands of ACL ruptures occurs annually, and only 55% of the athletes return to competitive level, with a 15 times higher chance of suffering a second injury. 60% of these injuries occur without physical contact and since they occur in the acute process, they can cause joint effusion, muscle weakness and functional incapacity. In the long term, they can contribute to a premature process of osteoarthritis. This narrative review is of particular interest for clinicians, practitioners, coaches and athletes to understand the main factors that contribute to an injury and/or re-injury and thus, to optimize their training to reduce and/or prevent the risk of injury and/or reinjury of ACL. Therefore, we aimed reports a narrative overview of the literature surrounding communication and explore through a theoretical review, the main risk factors for an ACL injury and/or re-injury, as well as bringing practical and correct methods of training applications. The lack of theoretical/practical knowledge on the part of rehabilitation and/or training professionals may impair the treatment of an athlete and/or student. High-quality research that can testing different training methods approaches in randomized controlled trials is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后成功恢复运动(RTS)是多因素的,因此困难和具有挑战性。不幸的是,低百分比的患者RTS,对于那些成功的人来说,五分之一的患者将遭受第二次ACL损伤。在过去的几年里,我们开发了测试电池来评估患者是否可以在第二次ACL损伤风险较低的情况下进行RTS.发现符合RTS标准的患者比例较低,再加上当前RTS测试电池在预测第二次ACL损伤方面的不足,这表明敏感性较差。RTS测试的结果很可能反映了康复计划的内容,对我们在康复计划中为患者提供的服务提出了关键问题。Wepreparingourpatientswellenoughforthehighdemandofcomplexsituationswithinpivotingteamsports?Thisnarrativereviewoffersinsightsfromkeylessonsofthelast15yearson1)RTStesting,2)康复的内容,和3)RTS连续体,都是从“直升机的角度”。
    A successful return to sports (RTS) after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is multifactorial, and therefore difficult and challenging. Unfortunately, low percentages of patients RTS, and for those who succeed, one-fifth of patients will sustain a second ACL injury. Over the past years, test batteries were developed to assess whether patients can RTS with a low risk for a second ACL injury risk. Low rates of patients who meet RTS criteria were found, coupled with the insufficiency of current RTS test batteries in predicting second ACL injuries suggesting poor sensitivity. The result of an RTS test is likely to reflect the content of a rehabilitation program, raising critical questions regarding what we are offering patients within the rehabilitation programme. Are we preparing our patients well enough for the high demands of complex situations within pivoting team sports? This narrative review offers insights from key lessons of the last 15 years on 1) RTS testing, 2) the content of rehabilitation, and 3) the RTS continuum, all from a \"helicopter perspective\".
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    运动损伤,包括前关键韧带断裂(ACLR)似乎与复杂的遗传背景有关,包括负责炎症反应的基因。这篇综述和荟萃分析研究了编码炎性细胞因子及其受体的基因多态性对ACLR风险的贡献。科学数据库ScienceDirect,EBSCO主机,Scopus,PubMed,和谷歌学者根据既定的纳入/排除标准进行了筛选(于2023年6月14日完成)(只有完全可访问,原创,纳入了以英文撰写的关于白细胞介素基因多态性对ACL损伤发生影响的人类病例对照研究),并使用R版本4.0.3进行了统计学荟萃分析。PRISMA方法用于审查文章。审查方案在Prospero数据库中以CRD42024514316号注册。确定了89项研究,并将其缩小到用于荟萃分析的3项原始病例对照研究。研究分析了波兰人,南非,和瑞典同伙,1282人。研究中指出的候选多态性涉及IL6rs1800795、IL6Rrs2228145和IL1Brs16944。系统评价显示IL6rs1800795多态性与波兰亚群ACLR之间的关系,以及南非亚群中的IL6Rrs2228145和IL1Brs16944。荟萃分析显示IL6rs1800795CG基因型过度表达(OR=1.30,95%CI1.02-1.66),虽然CC基因型在ACLR受试者中代表性不足(OR=0.75,95%CI0.54-1.03),但未显示IL6Rrs2228145的显着影响。此外,IL1Brs16944CT基因型具有保护性的趋势(OR0.89,95%CI0.70-1.14),而TT为风险基因型(OR1.19,95%CI0.84-1.68)。因此,白细胞介素受体IL6Rrs2228145与ACLR风险之间的关系未得到证实.然而,编码多效性IL6rs1800795的基因对ACLR发生率的影响是明确的,促炎性IL1Brs16944的作用是可能的.
    Sport injuries, including the anterior crucial ligament rupture (ACLR) seem to be related to complex genetic backgrounds, including the genes responsible for inflammatory response. This review and meta-analysis investigated the contribution of the polymorphisms of genes encoding inflammatory cytokines and their receptors to the risk of ACLR. The scientific databases Science Direct, EBSCO host, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar were screened (completed on 14 June 2023) according to the established inclusion/exclusion criteria (only fully accessible, original, human case-control studies written in English concerning the effect of interleukin genes\' polymorphisms on the occurrence of ACL injury were included) and statistical meta-analysis using R version 4.0.3 was performed. The PRISMA methodology was used to review articles. The review protocol was registered under the number CRD42024514316 in the Prospero database. Eighty-nine studies were identified and narrowed down to three original case-control studies used for the meta-analysis. The studies analyzed Polish, South African, and Swedish cohorts, altogether 1282 participants. The candidate polymorphisms indicated in the studies involved IL6 rs1800795, IL6R rs2228145 and IL1B rs16944. The systematic review showed the relationships between IL6 rs1800795 polymorphism and ACLR in the Polish subpopulation, and IL6R rs2228145 and IL1B rs16944 in the South African subpopulations. The meta-analysis revealed that the IL6 rs1800795 CG genotype was over-represented (OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.66), while the CC genotype was under-represented (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.54-1.03) in ACLR subjects, but no significant impact of IL6R rs2228145 was shown. Additionally, a tendency of the IL1B rs16944 CT genotype to be protective (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.70-1.14), while the TT to be a risk genotype (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.84-1.68) was observed. Thus, the relationship between the interleukin receptor IL6R rs2228145 and ACLR risk was not confirmed. However, the impact of genes coding pleiotropic IL6 rs1800795 on the incidences of ACLR was clear and the effect of pro-inflammatory IL1B rs16944 was possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于恢复运动(RTS)测试与前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后后续再损伤风险之间的关系,获得了不一致的结果。因此,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估RTS通过与ACLR后患者再损伤风险之间的潜在关联。
    该荟萃分析在INPLASY中注册,注册号为INPLASY202360027。电子数据库MedLine,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统搜索,以确定从开始到2023年9月的合格研究。调查的结果包括膝关节损伤,辅助ACL,对侧ACL损伤,和移植物破裂。使用随机效应模型计算合并比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
    总共选择了9项涉及1410名个体的研究进行最终定量分析。我们注意到通过RTS测试与后续膝关节损伤的风险无关(OR:0.95;95%CI:0.28-3.21;P=0.929)。继发性ACL损伤(OR:0.98;95%CI:0.55-1.75;P=0.945),和对侧ACL损伤(OR:1.53;95%CI:0.63-3.71;P=0.347)。然而,移植物破裂的风险显著降低(OR:0.49;95%CI:0.33-0.75;P=0.001).
    这项研究发现,通过RTS测试与随后膝盖受伤的风险无关,继发性ACL损伤,和对侧ACL损伤,虽然它与移植物破裂的风险较低有关。因此,建议ACLR后的患者在临床环境中通过RTS测试.
    UNASSIGNED: Inconsistent results have been obtained regarding the association between return-to-sport (RTS) testing and the risk of subsequent re-injury following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential association between passing of RTS and the risk of re-injury for patients after ACLR.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis was registered in INPLASY with the registration number INPLASY202360027. The electronic databases MedLine, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to identify eligible studies from their inception up to September 2023. The investigated outcomes included knee injury, secondary ACL, contralateral ACL injury, and graft rupture. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: A total number of nine studies involving 1410 individuals were selected for the final quantitative analysis. We noted that passing RTS test was not associated with the risk of subsequent knee injury (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.28-3.21; P = 0.929), secondary ACL injury (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.55-1.75; P = 0.945), and contralateral ACL injury (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.63-3.71; P = 0.347). However, the risk of graft rupture was significantly reduced (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.33-0.75; P = 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: This study found that passing RTS test was not associated with the risk of subsequent knee injury, secondary ACL injury, and contralateral ACL injury, while it was associated with a lower risk of graft rupture. Thus, it is recommended that patients after ACLR pass an RTS test in clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:评估半腱肌腱(ST)和股薄肌腱(GT)横截面积(CSA)在磁共振成像(MRI)和人体测量特征在术前估计移植物直径中的应用。
    方法:于2023年8月29日检索了三个数据库。作者坚持PRISMA(系统审查和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)和R-AMSTAR(修订的多重系统审查评估)指南以及Cochrane干预措施系统审查手册。人口统计数据,人体测量特征,成像技术,肌腱CSA,相关系数,敏感性,特殊性,记录预测术中移植物直径大于8mm的回归模型和截止值.
    结果:纳入46项研究,包括4140名患者。报告ST+GTCSA的19项研究中有12项(63.2%)发现与术中移植物直径有中等至非常高的相关性。报告STCSA和GTCSA的10项研究中的5项(50%)和7项研究中的一项(14.3%),分别,发现与术中移植物直径有中度到高度相关性。STGTCSA用于预测8mm以上的移植物直径的临界值为15.8至31.2mm2。据报道,身高的35项研究中有9项(25.7%)与移植物直径有中等至非常高的相关性。报告体重的33项研究中有7项(21.2%)发现与移植物直径中等相关。
    结论:在评估的MRI参数中,ST+GTCSA是移植物直径最可靠的预测因子。然而,关口,敏感性,预测8毫米以上直径的特异性差异很大。与MRI参数相比,人体测量特征对移植物直径的预测较少。临床医生可以使用此信息来预测由于移植物尺寸不足而面临ACLR失败风险的患者。
    方法:四级。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of semitendinosus tendon (ST) and gracilis tendon (GT) cross-sectional area (CSA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anthropometric characteristics in preoperative estimation of graft diameter in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with four-strand hamstring autografts.
    METHODS: Three databases were searched on 29 August 2023. The authors adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and R-AMSTAR (Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, anthropometric characteristics, imaging techniques, tendon CSA, correlation coefficients, sensitivities, specificities, regression models and cutoffs for predicting intraoperative graft diameters above 8 mm were recorded.
    RESULTS: Forty-six studies comprising 4140 patients were included. Twelve of 19 (63.2%) studies reporting on ST + GT CSA found a moderate to very high correlation with intraoperative graft diameter. Five of 10 (50%) and one of seven (14.3%) studies reporting on ST CSA and GT CSA, respectively, found a moderate to high correlation with intraoperative graft diameter. Cutoffs of ST + GT CSA for predicting graft diameters above 8 mm ranged from 15.8 to 31.2 mm2. Nine of 35 (25.7%) studies that reported on height found a moderate to very high correlation with graft diameter. Seven of 33 (21.2%) studies reporting on weight found a moderate correlation with graft diameter.
    CONCLUSIONS: Of the MRI parameters assessed, ST + GT CSA was the most reliable predictor of graft diameter. However, cutoffs, sensitivities, and specificities for predicting diameters above 8 mm were highly variable. Anthropometric characteristics in general were less predictive of graft diameter than MRI parameters. This information can be used by clinicians to predict patients at risk for ACLR failure due to insufficient graft size.
    METHODS: Level IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    ACL受伤后,康复包括多个阶段,这些阶段之间的进展是通过对活动的主观视觉评估来指导的,如跑步,跳跃,跳跃着陆,等。评估过程中对膝关节力矩和GRF等客观动力学措施的估计可以帮助物理治疗师了解膝关节负荷并制定康复方案。用于估计动力学的常规方法需要复杂的,昂贵的系统,并且仅限于实验室设置。或者,在文献中已经提出了多种算法来从仅使用IMU测量的运动学估计动力学。然而,对患者人群的准确性和普适性的认识仍然有限.因此,本文旨在确定使用仅从IMU测量的运动学估计动力学参数的可用算法,并通过全面的系统评价评估其在ACL康复中的适用性。通过搜索确定的论文是根据感兴趣的建模技术和动力学参数进行分类的,随后根据康复期间ACL患者的准确性和适用性进行比较。IMU在以良好的精度估计动力学参数方面表现出潜力,特别是对于健康队列中的矢状运动。然而,发现了几个缺点,并提出了未来的改进方向,包括扩展所提出的算法以适应多平面运动,并在不同患者群体,特别是ACL群体中验证所提出的技术。
    After an ACL injury, rehabilitation consists of multiple phases, and progress between these phases is guided by subjective visual assessments of activities such as running, hopping, jump landing, etc. Estimation of objective kinetic measures like knee joint moments and GRF during assessment can help physiotherapists gain insights on knee loading and tailor rehabilitation protocols. Conventional methods deployed to estimate kinetics require complex, expensive systems and are limited to laboratory settings. Alternatively, multiple algorithms have been proposed in the literature to estimate kinetics from kinematics measured using only IMUs. However, the knowledge about their accuracy and generalizability for patient populations is still limited. Therefore, this article aims to identify the available algorithms for the estimation of kinetic parameters using kinematics measured only from IMUs and to evaluate their applicability in ACL rehabilitation through a comprehensive systematic review. The papers identified through the search were categorized based on the modelling techniques and kinetic parameters of interest, and subsequently compared based on the accuracies achieved and applicability for ACL patients during rehabilitation. IMUs have exhibited potential in estimating kinetic parameters with good accuracy, particularly for sagittal movements in healthy cohorts. However, several shortcomings were identified and future directions for improvement have been proposed, including extension of proposed algorithms to accommodate multiplanar movements and validation of the proposed techniques in diverse patient populations and in particular the ACL population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的分析ACL重建术患者术前康复的需求。方法使用PubMed检索2018年至2023年的数据库报告,Cochrane图书馆数据库,Medline,和其他已发表的试验。由ReviewManager进行统计分析。结果术前康复组术后2年KOOS评分各分项评分及总均值均明显高于术前康复组,疼痛(p<0。0001),症状(p<0。0001),ADL(p<0。0001),体育和娱乐(p<0。0001),QoL(p<0。0001),和KOOS评分的总平均值(p<0.0001)。相反,术前康复组术后3个月Lysholm评分无明显升高(p=0.12).结论这项荟萃分析得出的结论是术前康复可能提供更好的长期术后疗效。然而,它可能不会提供太多的短期结果。建议增加术前康复作为ACL损伤管理的指南,以改善接受ACL重建手术的ACL损伤患者的长期预后。
    Objective  The aim of this study is to analyse the needs for pre-operative rehabilitation in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Methods  The database reports were searched within 2018 to 2023, using PubMed, Cochrane library database, Medline, and other published trials. A statistical analysis was made from Review Manager. Results  Pre-operative rehabilitation group shows significantly higher 2 years post-operative KOOS score in all subscore and the total mean of the score, pain (p < 0. 0001), symptoms (p < 0. 0001), ADL (p < 0. 0001), sports and recreations (p < 0. 0001), QoL (p < 0. 0001), and the total mean of the KOOS score (p < 0.0001). In contrary, pre-operative rehabilitation group shows insignificantly higher score on 3 months post-operative Lysholm score (p = 0.12). Conclusion  This meta-analysis conclude pre-operative rehabilitation may provide better long-term post-operative outcome, however it may not provide much of a short-term outcome. It is recommended to add pre-operative rehabilitation as a guideline for ACL injury management to improve long-term outcome of patients with ACL injury undergoing ACL reconstruction procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号