Alzheimer's

老年痴呆症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了支持侧重于早期干预的临床试验设计,我们的研究确定了在痴呆前人群中可靠的早期β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)积累。
    方法:共有1032名来自淀粉样蛋白成像预防阿尔茨海默病-预后和自然史研究(AMYPAD-PNHS)和Insight46的参与者接受了[18F]氟美他莫,包括[18F]florbetaben或[18F]florbetapir淀粉样蛋白-PET。通过估计子群体中纵向测量值的第95百分位数(NPMNHS=101/750,NInsight46=35/382),使用了规范策略来定义可靠的积累,预计会随着时间的推移保持稳定。使用精确召回分析研究了最佳预测未来积累的基线CL阈值。使用线性混合效应模型检查了累积率。
    结果:PNHS中的可靠积累估计发生在>3.0CL/年。16[12,19]最佳预测未来Aβ累加器的基线CL。淀粉样蛋白积累率与示踪剂无关,对于APOEε4非运营商,以及受教育程度较高的科目。
    结论:我们的结果支持12-20CL窗口纳入早期二级预防研究。可靠的积累定义需要进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: To support clinical trial designs focused on early interventions, our study determined reliable early amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation based on Centiloids (CL) in pre-dementia populations.
    METHODS: A total of 1032 participants from the Amyloid Imaging to Prevent Alzheimer\'s Disease-Prognostic and Natural History Study (AMYPAD-PNHS) and Insight46 who underwent [18F]flutemetamol, [18F]florbetaben or [18F]florbetapir amyloid-PET were included. A normative strategy was used to define reliable accumulation by estimating the 95th percentile of longitudinal measurements in sub-populations (NPNHS = 101/750, NInsight46 = 35/382) expected to remain stable over time. The baseline CL threshold that optimally predicts future accumulation was investigated using precision-recall analyses. Accumulation rates were examined using linear mixed-effect models.
    RESULTS: Reliable accumulation in the PNHS was estimated to occur at >3.0 CL/year. Baseline CL of 16 [12,19] best predicted future Aβ-accumulators. Rates of amyloid accumulation were tracer-independent, lower for APOE ε4 non-carriers, and for subjects with higher levels of education.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results support a 12-20 CL window for inclusion into early secondary prevention studies. Reliable accumulation definition warrants further investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:阿尔茨海默病的复杂病因提示预防潜力。在针对特定风险人群的多模式干预措施中,风险评分具有潜在的风险分层工具和替代结果。在一项多领域生活方式随机对照试验中,对澳大利亚国立大学阿尔茨海默病风险指数(ANU-ADRI)与认知及其作为替代结果的适用性进行了测试。在有痴呆症风险的老年人中。
    方法:在对芬兰预防认知障碍和残疾干预研究(FINGER)的事后分析中,ANU-ADRI在基线计算,12个月和24个月(n=1174)。ANU-ADRI与认知之间的关联(在基线和随时间的变化),干预对ANU-ADRI变化的影响,使用具有最大似然估计的线性混合模型评估基线ANU-ADRI对认知变化的干预效果的潜在影响.
    结果:较高的ANU-ADRI与较差的认知显著相关,在基线(例如,全球认知估计[95%置信区间]为-0.028[-0.032至-0.025]),在2年的研究中(例如,ANU-ADRI2年变化和全球认知每年变化的估计值[95%置信区间]为-0.068[-0.026~-0.108]).ANU-ADRI没有显著的有益干预效果,基线ANU-ADRI对认知变化的干预反应无显著影响.
    结论:ANU-ADRI可有效预测认知功能下降的风险。风险评分可能对新型痴呆预防策略的成功至关重要。但是他们的算法,目标人群,在为每个上下文选择合适的工具时,应仔细考虑干预设计。
    OBJECTIVE: The complex aetiology of Alzheimer\'s disease suggests prevention potential. Risk scores have potential as risk stratification tools and surrogate outcomes in multimodal interventions targeting specific at-risk populations. The Australian National University Alzheimer\'s Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) was tested in relation to cognition and its suitability as a surrogate outcome in a multidomain lifestyle randomized controlled trial, in older adults at risk of dementia.
    METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the Finnish Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER), ANU-ADRI was calculated at baseline, 12, and 24 months (n = 1174). The association between ANU-ADRI and cognition (at baseline and over time), the intervention effect on changes in ANU-ADRI, and the potential impact of baseline ANU-ADRI on the intervention effect on changes in cognition were assessed using linear mixed models with maximum likelihood estimation.
    RESULTS: A higher ANU-ADRI was significantly related to worse cognition, at baseline (e.g., estimate for global cognition [95% confidence interval] was -0.028 [-0.032 to -0.025]) and over the 2-year study (e.g., estimate for 2-year changes in ANU-ADRI and per-year changes in global cognition [95% confidence interval] was -0.068 [-0.026 to -0.108]). No significant beneficial intervention effect was reported for ANU-ADRI, and baseline ANU-ADRI did not significantly affect the response to the intervention on changes in cognition.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ANU-ADRI was effective for the risk prediction of cognitive decline. Risk scores may be crucial for the success of novel dementia prevention strategies, but their algorithm, the target population, and the intervention design should be carefully considered when choosing the appropriate tool for each context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们研究了心房颤动(AF)与痴呆之间的关系,及其亚型(血管VaD,老年痴呆症,混合和罕见的痴呆症),并确定了房颤患者痴呆的预测因素。
    方法:分析基于1998年至2016年在英国的183,610例新发房颤患者和367,220例非房颤对照,在三个前瞻性收集中确定。链接的电子健康记录来源。使用Cox比例风险和加权Cox进行事件发生时间(痴呆或亚型)分析。进行的子分析:包括并审查中风和年龄(中位数用作截止值)。
    结果:房颤患者的中位随访时间为2.67年(IQR.65-6.02),非房颤患者为5.84年(IQR2.26-11.80),房颤队列中痴呆的发病率为2.65/100人年,相比于非AF队列中的2.02。调整后,房颤与全因痴呆之间存在显著关联(HR=1.38,95%CI:1.31-1.45),受与VaD强关联的驱动(HR=1.55,95%CI:1.41-1.70)。房颤也与混合型痴呆相关(HR=1.26,95%CI:1.01-1.56),但我们无法确认与阿尔茨海默病(HR=1.05,95%CI:.94-1.16)和罕见痴呆形式(HR=1.19,95%CI:.90-1.56)的相关性.缺血性卒中(HR=1.40,95%CI:1.26-1.56),蛛网膜下腔出血(HR=2.08,95%CI:1.47-2.96),脑出血(HR=1.95,95%CI:1.54~2.48)和糖尿病(HR=1.32,95%CI:1.24~1.41)是房颤患者痴呆的最强预测因子.
    结论:房颤患者患痴呆的风险增加,独立于中风,VaD风险最高。管理和预防已确定的风险因素对于减轻痴呆症日益增加的负担至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: We investigated the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and dementia, and its subtypes (vascular-VaD, Alzheimer, mixed and rare dementia), and identified predictors for dementia in AF patients.
    METHODS: The analysis was based on 183,610 patients with new-onset AF and 367,220 non-AF controls in the United Kingdom between 1998 and 2016, identified in three prospectively collected, linked electronic health records sources. Time-to-event (dementia or subtypes) analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards and weighted Cox. Sub-analyses performed: including & censoring stroke and age (median used as cut-off).
    RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 2.67 years (IQR .65-6.02) for AF patients and 5.84 years for non-AF patients (IQR 2.26-11.80), incidence of dementia in the AF cohort was 2.65 per 100 person-years, compared to 2.02 in the non-AF cohort. After adjustment, a significant association was observed between AF and all-cause dementia (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.31-1.45), driven by a strong association with VaD (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.41-1.70). AF was also associated with mixed dementia (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01-1.56), but we could not confirm an association with Alzheimer (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: .94-1.16) and rare dementia forms (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: .90-1.56). Ischemic stroke (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.26-1.56), subarachnoid haemorrhage (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.47-2.96), intracerebral haemorrhage (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.54-2.48) and diabetes (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.24-1.41) were identified as the strongest predictors of dementia in AF patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: AF patients have an increased risk of dementia, independent of stroke, with highest risk of VaD. Management and prevention of the identified risk factors could be crucial to reduce the increasing burden of dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    难民患精神疾病的比率更高,例如抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),这些都是痴呆症的危险因素。信仰和精神实践已被证明在患者理解和应对疾病方面发挥着重要作用,然而,难民人口中的这一研究领域仍然缺乏。本研究旨在通过研究在阿拉伯和西方国家定居的阿拉伯难民中信仰对心理健康和认知健康的作用来解决这一文献空白。
    共有61名阿拉伯难民通过圣地亚哥的族裔社区组织被招募,加州,美国(N=29)和安曼,约旦(N=32)。参与者通过深入的访谈,半结构化访谈或焦点小组。采访和焦点小组被转录,翻译,并使用归纳主题分析进行编码,并基于Leventhal的自我调节模型进行组织。
    信仰和精神实践显着影响参与者的疾病观念和应对程序,无论安置国家或性别。出现了几个主题:(1)参与者相信心理健康和认知健康之间的相互依存关系。(2)对难民经历和创伤对参与者心理健康问题的影响有自我意识,导致人们相信患痴呆症的个人风险增加。(3)精神宿命论(相信事件是上帝预先确定的,命运,或命运)极大地告知了这些对心理和认知健康的看法。(4)参与者承认,练习信仰可以改善他们的心理和认知健康,许多人读经文来预防痴呆症。(5)最后,精神上的感恩和信任是重要的应对程序,可以在参与者中建立韧性。
    信仰和灵性在塑造阿拉伯难民的疾病表征和心理和认知健康的应对程序中起着重要作用。越来越需要针对老年难民的精神需求和将宗教纳入预防策略的整体公共卫生和临床干预措施,以改善难民的大脑健康和福祉。
    UNASSIGNED: Refugees experience higher rates of mental illness such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which are documented risk factors for dementia. Faith and spiritual practices have been shown to play a significant role in patients\' understanding and coping with illness, however, this field of study among refugee populations remains lacking. This study aims to address this literature gap by examining the role of faith on mental health and cognitive health among Arab refugees resettled in Arab and Western countries.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 61 Arab refugees were recruited through ethnic community-based organizations in San Diego, California, United States (N = 29) and Amman, Jordan (N = 32). Participants were interviewed through in-depth, semi-structured interviews or focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed, translated, and coded using inductive thematic analysis and organized based on Leventhal\'s Self-Regulation Model.
    UNASSIGNED: Faith and spiritual practices significantly impact participants\' illness perceptions and coping procedures regardless of resettlement country or gender. Several themes emerged: (1) participants believe in the interdependent relationship between mental and cognitive health. (2) There is a self-awareness of the impact of the refugee experience and trauma on participants\' mental health problems, leading to a belief of increased personal risk for developing dementia. (3) Spiritual fatalism (belief that events are predetermined by God, fate, or destiny) greatly informs these perceptions of mental and cognitive health. (4) Participants acknowledge that practicing faith improves their mental and cognitive health, and many read scripture to prevent dementia. (5) Finally, spiritual gratitude and trust are important coping procedures that build resilience among participants.
    UNASSIGNED: Faith and spirituality play an important role in shaping Arab refugees\' illness representations and coping procedures of mental and cognitive health. Holistic public health and clinical interventions tailored to the spiritual needs of aging refugees and incorporating religion in prevention strategies are increasingly needed to improve the brain health and wellbeing of refugees.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对痴呆症患者的非正式护理不仅会影响主要照顾者的福祉,还会改变他们的角色以及与社会环境的互动。新的在线干预措施可能有助于获得社会支持。最近,一个在线社交支持平台,Inlife,是在荷兰开发的,旨在加强非正式支持网络中的社会支持和积极互动。
    目的:本研究旨在评估Inlife对痴呆症患者照顾者的有效性。
    方法:对96名痴呆患者照顾者进行了一项随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到Inlife干预或等待列表对照组。Inlife使用16周后,等待列表控制组可以开始使用Inlife。在基线(T0)评估效果,8周(T1),和16周(T2)。16周随访评估(T2)作为主要终点,用于评估通过在线自我报告问卷评估的主要和次要结果变量的结果。主要结果包括对护理人员能力的感受和感知的社会支持。次要结果包括获得支持,孤独的感觉,心理抱怨(例如,焦虑,stress),和生活质量。
    结果:在主要结局方面,干预组(n=48)相对于对照组(n=48)没有显着改善(护理能力感:b=-0.057,95%CI-0.715至0.602,P=.87;感知社会支持:b=-15.877,95%CI-78.284至46.530,P=.62)或任何次要结局。这与我们的定性发现形成鲜明对比,这些发现表明Inlife具有促进日常生活中护理过程的潜力。对于所有Inlife用户来说,坚持并不是最佳的。额外的符合方案和敏感性分析也显示,对于高活跃的Inlife用户或特定亚组,没有有益的结果。当成为更大网络的一部分时,Inlife用户更加活跃。
    结论:研究人员在幸福感和生活质量的定量指标方面,对在线护理人员干预的有效性应保持适度。然而,在线工具有可能促进日常生活中的照顾者过程。吸取的经验教训包括在电子健康中利用人类互动力量的重要性,利用用户的社会资本,以及需要开发研究方法,以确定对护理人员在生态上有效的日常生活中的益处。
    背景:荷兰试验注册NTR6131;https://trialsearch。谁。int/Trial2。aspx?试验ID=NTR6131。
    未经批准:RR2-10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y。
    BACKGROUND: Informal care for people with dementia not only affects the well-being of the primary caregiver but also changes their roles and interactions with the social environment. New online interventions might facilitate access to social support. Recently, an online social support platform, Inlife, was developed in the Netherlands and aims to enhance social support and positive interactions in informal support networks.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Inlife for caregivers of people with dementia.
    METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with 96 caregivers of people with dementia was performed. Participants were randomly assigned to the Inlife intervention or the waiting list control group. After 16 weeks of Inlife use, the waiting list control group could start using Inlife. Effects were evaluated at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), and 16 weeks (T2). The 16-week follow-up assessment (T2) served as the primary endpoint to evaluate the results for the primary and secondary outcome variables evaluated with online self-report questionnaires. The primary outcomes included feelings of caregiver competence and perceived social support. The secondary outcomes included received support, feelings of loneliness, psychological complaints (eg, anxiety, stress), and quality of life.
    RESULTS: No significant improvements were demonstrated for the intervention group (n=48) relative to the control group (n=48) for the primary outcomes (feeling of carer competence: b=-0.057, 95% CI -0.715 to 0.602, P=.87; perceived social support: b=-15.877, 95% CI -78.284 to 46.530, P=.62) or any secondary outcome. This contrasts with our qualitative findings showing the potential of Inlife to facilitate the care process in daily life. Adherence was not optimal for all Inlife users. Additional per-protocol and sensitivity analyses also revealed no beneficial results for high active Inlife users or specific subgroups. Inlife users were more active when part of a larger network.
    CONCLUSIONS: Researchers should be modest regarding the effectiveness of online caregiver interventions in terms of quantitative measures of well-being and quality of life. Nevertheless, online tools have the potential to facilitate the caregiver process in daily life. Lessons learned include the importance of harnessing the power of human interaction in eHealth, making use of the user\'s social capital, and the need to develop research methods that can identify benefits in daily life that are ecologically valid for caregivers.
    BACKGROUND: Netherlands Trial Register NTR6131; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR6131.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经ASSIGNED:由于其低成本,侵入性较小,和现成的可用性,阿尔茨海默病的血浆生物标志物已被提议作为临床试验和研究的一次性筛选工具。一氧化氮因子对这些生物标志物的影响很少受到关注。当前的横断面研究调查了Aβ40,Aβ42,总tau(ttau)的水平,和神经丝光(NfL)在基于社区的老年人队列中,对美国三个主要的小鼠组进行诊断。
    未经评估:共有1,862名参与者(852名墨西哥裔美国人(MA);775名非西班牙裔白人(NHW),和235非洲裔美国人(AA))来自健康与衰老大脑研究-健康差异(HABS-HD)研究。使用经共识审查验证的算法(决策树)分配诊断。使用Simoa技术测定血浆样品。使用ANOVA协方差性别和年龄,比较了三个认知诊断中每个生物标志物的水平。
    UNASSIGNED:在认知损害的每个水平上,各组之间都发现了显著差异。与认知未受损的MA或NHW相比,认知未受损(CU)AA的每种生物标志物的水平均显着较低,而NHW的Aβ40和NfL水平高于其他两组。MA的ttau高于AA或NHW。轻度认知障碍(MCI)组NHW在所有生物标志物中的水平最高,AA最低。NHW和MA的Aβ40,Aβ42和ttau水平较高,两组之间的Aβ42没有差异。NHW有明显较高水平的Aβ40,ttau,NfL比AA。对于CUMCI,AA的Aβ42/Aβ40比率高于NHW或MA。
    UNASSIGNED:使用认知功能减退的血浆生物标志物是有希望的,因为它们优于其他生物标志物,如CSF和成像,但正如目前的研究表明,为了提高准确性和实用性,必须考虑药物的差异。需要通过测定平台为每种生物标志物开发特定于乙醇的切点并建立规范范围。评估认知衰退期间生物标志物变化的纵向研究正在进行中。
    UNASSIGNED: Due to their low cost, less invasive nature, and ready availability, plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer\'s disease have been proposed as one-time screening tools for clinical trials and research. The impact of ethnoracial factors on these biomarkers has received little attention. The current cross-sectional study investigated the levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau (t tau), and neurofilament light (NfL) across diagnoses for each of the three major ethnoracial groups in the United States in a community-based cohort of older adults.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,862 participants (852 Mexican Americans (MAs); 775 non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), and 235 African Americans (AAs)) drawn from The Health & Aging Brain Study-Health Disparities (HABS-HD) study were included. Diagnoses were assigned using an algorithm (decision tree) verified by consensus review. Plasma samples were assayed using Simoa technology. Levels of each biomarker were compared for the three ethnoracial groups across cognitive diagnoses using ANOVA covarying sex and age.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences were found across the groups at each level of cognitive impairment. Cognitively unimpaired (CU) AA had significantly lower levels of each of the biomarkers than cognitively unimpaired MA or NHW and NHW had higher levels of Aβ40, and NfL than the other two groups. MA had higher t tau than AA or NHW. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) group NHW had the highest levels on all the biomarkers and AA had the lowest. NHW and MA have higher levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, and t tau there was no difference between the groups for Aβ42. NHW had significantly higher levels of Aβ40, t tau, and NfL than AA. AA had a higher Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio than either NHW or MA for CU MCI.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of plasma biomarkers of cognitive decline is promising given their advantages over other biomarkers such as CSF and imaging but as the current research shows, ethnoracial differences must be considered to enhance accuracy and utility. Developing ethnoracial-specific cut points and establishing normative ranges by assay platform for each of the biomarkers are needed. Longitudinal research to assess changes in biomarkers during a cognitive decline is ongoing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:AMYPAD诊断和患者管理研究(DPMS)旨在调查欧洲淀粉样蛋白PET的临床实用性和成本效益。在这里,我们介绍参与者的基线特征,并讨论队列的代表性。
    方法:主观认知下降加(SCD+)的参与者,轻度认知障碍(MCI),从2018年4月16日至2020年10月30日,在欧洲的8个记忆诊所招募了痴呆症或痴呆症,并随机分为3组:ARM1,早期淀粉样蛋白PET;ARM2,晚期淀粉样蛋白PET;和ARM3,自由选择。
    结果:共有840名参与者(244SCD+,341名MCI和255名痴呆症)被纳入。在招募记忆诊所或先前报道的队列中,社会人口统计学/临床特征没有显着差异。随机化将35%的参与者分配给ARM1,32%分配给ARM2,33%分配给ARM3;认知阶段平均分布在手臂上。
    结论:AMYPAD-DPMS参与者的特征与记忆临床人群的预期一样。这确保了未来研究结果的普遍性。
    BACKGROUND: AMYPAD Diagnostic and Patient Management Study (DPMS) aims to investigate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of amyloid-PET in Europe. Here we present participants\' baseline features and discuss the representativeness of the cohort.
    METHODS: Participants with subjective cognitive decline plus (SCD+), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia were recruited in eight European memory clinics from April 16, 2018, to October 30, 2020, and randomized into three arms: ARM1, early amyloid-PET; ARM2, late amyloid-PET; and ARM3, free-choice.
    RESULTS: A total of 840 participants (244 SCD+, 341 MCI, and 255 dementia) were enrolled. Sociodemographic/clinical features did not differ significantly among recruiting memory clinics or with previously reported cohorts. The randomization assigned 35% of participants to ARM1, 32% to ARM2, and 33% to ARM3; cognitive stages were distributed equally across the arms.
    CONCLUSIONS: The features of AMYPAD-DPMS participants are as expected for a memory clinic population. This ensures the generalizability of future study results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:关于痴呆症风险的大多数证据来自欧洲白人血统的相对富裕的人。我们的目的是确定种族之间的联系,地区层面的社会经济剥夺和痴呆症风险,以及风险变化可能归因于已知的可改变的临床风险因素和健康行为的程度。
    未经评估:在这项嵌套病例对照研究中,我们分析了来自东伦敦四个市镇的1,016,277人口的初级保健医疗记录数据,英国,2009年至2018年收集。结果衡量标准是根据种族和贫困程度对痴呆症的比值比,在添加痴呆的主要可改变危险因素之前和之后;和加权人群归因危险因素之间的比较。
    未经评估:我们确定了4137例痴呆症病例和15,754例匹配的对照(病例和对照的平均年龄为80·7岁,(SD8·7);81·3年,(SD8·9)范围27-103)。相对于白人,黑人和南亚种族均与痴呆风险增加相关(比值比[95%CI]:黑人1·43[1·31-1·56];南亚1.17[1·06-1·29])。区域水平剥夺以剂量依赖性方式独立地与痴呆风险增加相关。黑人和南亚种族都与痴呆症诊断的年龄较小有关(优势比[95CI]:0·70[0·61-0·80]和0·55[0·47-0·65],分别)。在该人群中,种族(9·7%)和贫困(11·7%)的人口归因风险高于任何已确定的可改变风险因素。
    UNASSIGNED:种族和地区水平的剥夺与东伦敦的痴呆风险独立相关。这种影响可能不归因于已知风险因素的影响。
    未经授权:Barts慈善机构(MGU0366)。
    UNASSIGNED: Most evidence about dementia risk comes from relatively affluent people of White European ancestry. We aimed to determine the association between ethnicity, area level socioeconomic deprivation and dementia risk, and the extent to which variation in risk might be attributable to known modifiable clinical risk factors and health behaviours.
    UNASSIGNED: In this nested case-control study, we analysed data from primary care medical records of a population of 1,016,277 from four inner East London boroughs, United Kingdom, collected between 2009 and 2018. The outcome measures were odds ratios for dementia according to ethnicity and deprivation, before and after the addition of major modifiable risk factors for dementia; and weighted population attributable risk for comparison between individual risk factors.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 4137 dementia cases and 15,754 matched controls (mean age for cases and controls were 80·7 years, (SD 8·7); 81·3 years, (SD 8·9) respectively, range 27-103). Black and South Asian ethnicity were both associated with increased risk of dementia relative to White (odds ratios [95% CI]: Black 1·43 [1·31-1·56]; South Asian 1.17 [1·06-1·29]). Area-level deprivation was independently associated with an increased risk of dementia in a dose-dependent manner. Black and South Asian ethnicity were both associated with a younger age at dementia diagnosis (odds ratios [95%CI]: 0·70 [0·61-0·80] and 0·55 [0·47-0·65], respectively). Population attributable risk was higher for ethnicity (9·7%) and deprivation (11·7%) than for any established modifiable risk factor in this population.
    UNASSIGNED: Ethnicity and area-level deprivation are independently associated with dementia risk in East London. This effect may not be attributable to the effect of known risk factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Barts Charity (MGU0366).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于自我报告的咖啡消费和吸烟对痴呆症风险的研究表明,结果与孟德尔随机两项样本研究相冲突。我们使用观察性和单样本孟德尔随机化设计与个体水平数据检验了咖啡消费和吸烟影响痴呆风险的假设。
    我们纳入了来自两个丹麦普通人群队列(中位年龄58岁)的114,551名个体。首先,我们测试了自我报告的高咖啡摄入量/吸烟是否与痴呆风险相关.第二,基因预测CYP1A1/AHR/CHRNA3基因附近变异导致的高咖啡消费/吸烟是否与痴呆风险相关.
    我们观察到3,784例痴呆事件。适度的自我报告的咖啡消费与所有痴呆和非阿尔茨海默痴呆的低风险相关。与阿尔茨海默病的趋势相似。遗传预测的高咖啡摄入量与所有痴呆症的高风险相关(每+1杯/天的风险比[95%置信区间]:1.20[1.01-1.42]),非阿尔茨海默氏症的趋势相似(1.23[0.95-1.53])。高自我报告吸烟与非阿尔茨海默痴呆的高风险相关。高基因预测吸烟与所有痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的高风险趋势相关(每+1包年的风险比:1.04[0.96-1.11])和1.06[0.97-1.16])。
    适度的自我报告的咖啡消费与所有和非阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆的低风险相关,而高基因预测的咖啡消费量与相反的趋势有关。高自我报告吸烟与非阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆的高风险相关,与遗传预测吸烟对所有痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的趋势相似。
    Studies of self-reported coffee consumption and smoking on risk of dementia have shown results conflicting with two-sample Mendelian randomization studies. We tested the hypotheses that coffee consumption and smoking influence risk of dementia using observational and one-sample Mendelian randomization designs with individual level data.
    We included 114,551 individuals from two Danish general population cohorts (median age 58 years). First, we tested whether high self-reported coffee consumption/smoking were associated with risk of dementia. Second, whether genetically predicted high coffee consumption/smoking due to variation near CYP1A1/AHR/CHRNA3 genes were associated with risk of dementia.
    We observed 3,784 dementia events. Moderate self-reported coffee consumption was associated with low risk of all dementia and non-Alzheimer\'s dementia, with a similar trend for Alzheimer\'s disease. Genetically predicted high coffee consumption was associated with high risk of all dementia (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] per +1 cup/day: 1.20 [1.01-1.42]), with a similar trend for non-Alzheimer\'s dementia (1.23 [0.95-1.53]). High self-reported smoking was associated with high risk of non-Alzheimer\'s dementia. High genetically predicted smoking was associated with a trend towards high risk of all dementia and Alzheimer\'s disease (hazard ratios per +1 pack-year: 1.04 [0.96-1.11]) and 1.06 [0.97-1.16]).
    Moderate self-reported coffee consumption was associated with low risk of all and non-Alzheimer\'s dementia, while high genetically predicted coffee consumption was associated with a trend towards the opposite. High self-reported smoking was associated with high risk of non-Alzheimer\'s dementia, with a similar trend for genetically predicted smoking on all dementia and Alzheimer\'s disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在随机对照试验的报告中,建议对注意力控制条件进行全面描述,但往往缺乏。在一项具有注意力控制条件的随机对照试验中,对针对痴呆症患者的非正式护理人员的Tele-Savvy照顾者计划进行了测试。这项试验的目的是测试Tele-Savvy在减少护理对护理人员的负面影响方面的功效,提高痴呆症患者的生活质量,和提高护理人员的掌握。我们描述了注意力控制条件的设计和实施,并检查了与注意力控制条件相关的结果。护理人员被随机分配到即时Tele-Savvy(活跃状态),健康生活(注意力控制)或候补名单。注意力控制内容集中在健康的生活方式上,并不打算影响Tele-Savvy所针对的结果。注意控制组在干预结构和持续时间上与Tele-Savvy相似:它包括每周7次小组视频会议和36次视频课程。在基线和基线后3个月和6个月收集护理人员和痴呆症患者的结果数据。使用多级混合效应模型来确定结果的变化。111名护理人员被随机分配到注意力控制条件下(减员21.6%)。进行了18次形成性评估访谈,重点关注护理人员在注意力控制条件下的经验。注意力控制条件完成者在Tele-Savvy所针对的变量中没有统计学上的显着变化。这些结果可用于行为干预研究中注意力控制条件的设计和实施。
    In reports of randomized controlled trials, thorough description of the attention control condition has been recommended, yet is frequently lacking. The Tele-Savvy Caregiver program for informal caregivers of persons living with dementia was tested in a randomized controlled trial with an attention control condition. The purpose of this trial was to test Tele-Savvy\'s efficacy in reducing the negative effects of caregiving on caregivers, promoting quality of life for persons living with dementia, and improving caregiver mastery. We describe the design and implementation of and examine the outcomes associated with the attention control condition. Caregivers were randomized to the immediate Tele-Savvy (active condition), Healthy Living (attention control), or waitlist. The attention control content was focused on healthy lifestyle and was not intended to affect the outcomes that Tele-Savvy targeted. The attention control group was similar to Tele-Savvy in the intervention structure and duration: it consisted of seven weekly group videoconferences and 36 video lessons. Data on outcomes of caregivers and persons living with dementia were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months postbaseline. Multilevel mixed effects models were used to determine changes in the outcomes. One hundred and eleven caregivers were randomized to the attention control condition (attrition 21.6%). Eighteen formative assessment interviews focusing on caregivers\' experience in the attention control condition were conducted. The attention control condition completers had no statistically significant changes in the variables that Tele-Savvy targeted. These results may be used in the design and implementation of attention control conditions in behavioral intervention research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号