AlphaFold

AlphaFold
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPIs)参与大多数细胞功能,详细了解这种相互作用对于研究它们在正常和病理条件下的作用至关重要。通过计算方法的进步,在识别PPI方面正在取得重大进展。特别是,基于AlphaFold2机器学习的模型已被证明可以通过预测蛋白质复合物的3D结构来加速药物发现过程.在这一章中,提供了用于预测PAR-3与其蛋白质伴侣衔接分子crk之间的蛋白质间相互作用的简单方案。这种基于人工智能和公开可用的方法可以为进一步研究治疗药物靶标提供资源。
    Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are known to be involved in most cellular functions, and a detailed knowledge of such interactions is essential for studying their role in normal and pathological conditions. Significant progress is being made in the identification of PPIs through advances in computational methods. In particular, the AlphaFold2 machine learning-based model has been shown to accelerate drug discovery process by predicting the 3D structure of protein complexes. In this chapter, a straightforward protocol for predicting interprotein interactions between PAR-3 and its protein partner adapter molecule crk is provided. Such artificial intelligence-based and publicly available approaches can provide a resource for further investigation of therapeutic drug targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:短暂性妊娠引起的库欣综合征是一种罕见的疾病,其特征是仅在怀孕期间表现出症状。通常在分娩或流产后自发解决。虽然已经确定GNAS与肾上腺肿瘤有关,其在妊娠性库欣综合征发病机制中的具体作用尚不明确。这项工作旨在研究GNAS突变与妊娠诱导的库欣综合征之间的关联。
    方法:从患者外周血和肿瘤组织中提取DNA进行全外显子组测序(WES)和Sanger测序。我们使用AlphaFold预测野生型和突变型GNAS的蛋白质结构,并进行功能预测。和免疫组织化学用于检测疾病相关蛋白的表达。对报道的短暂性妊娠诱发库欣综合征的病例进行了回顾和总结。
    结果:使用WES,我们在GNAS中鉴定了一个体细胞突变(NM_000516,c.C601T,p.R201C)使用计算方法预测会产生有害影响,例如AlphaFold。人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)刺激试验有弱阳性结果,肾上腺腺瘤组织的免疫组织化学染色也显示黄体生成素/绒毛膜促性腺激素受体(LHCGR)和细胞色素P450家族11亚家族B成员1(CYP11B1)阳性。我们回顾了15例妊娠引起的短暂性库欣综合征。在这些案例中,在3例报告中,肾上腺的免疫组织化学染色显示LHCGR阳性表达,与我们的发现相似。
    结论:短暂性妊娠诱导的库欣综合征可能与体细胞GNAS突变和由于LHCGR异常激活引起的肾上腺病理改变有关。
    OBJECTIVE: Transient pregnancy-induced Cushing\'s syndrome is a rare condition characterized by the manifestation of symptoms solely during pregnancy, which typically resolve spontaneously following delivery or miscarriage. While it has been established that GNAS is associated with adrenal tumors, its specific role in the pathogenesis of pregnancy-induced Cushing\'s syndrome remains uncertain.This work aims to examine the association between GNAS mutation and pregnancy-induced Cushing\'s syndrome.
    METHODS: DNA was extracted from patients\' peripheral blood and tumor tissues for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and Sanger sequencing. We used AlphaFold to predict the protein structure of wild-type and mutant GNAS and to make functional predictions, and immunohistochemistry was used to detect disease-associated protein expression. A review and summary of reported cases of transient pregnancy-induced Cushing\'s syndrome induced by pregnancy was conducted.
    RESULTS: Using WES, we identified a somatic mutation in GNAS (NM_000516, c.C601T, p.R201C) that was predicted to have a deleterious effect using computational methods, such as AlphaFold. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation tests had weakly positive results, and immunohistochemical staining of adrenal adenoma tissue also revealed positivity for luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) and cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily B member 1 (CYP11B1). We reviewed 15 published cases of transient Cushing\'s syndrome induced by pregnancy. Among these cases, immunohistochemical staining of the adrenal gland showed positive LHCGR expression in 3 case reports, similar to our findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Transient pregnancy-induced Cushing\'s syndrome may be associated with somatic GNAS mutations and altered adrenal pathology due to abnormal activation of LHCGR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    Barbarin-Bocahu&Graille文章中的一个数字[(2022),ActaCryst.D78,517-531]已更正。
    A figure in the article by Barbarin-Bocahu & Graille [(2022), Acta Cryst. D78, 517-531] is corrected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,基于神经网络(NN)的蛋白质建模方法得到了显着改善。尽管两种非同源性建模方法的总体准确性,AlphaFold和RoseTTAFold,是杰出的,它们对特定蛋白质家族的表现仍未检查。G-蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)蛋白是特别令人感兴趣的,因为它们涉及多种途径。这项工作直接比较了这些新的基于深度学习的GPCR蛋白质建模方法与最广泛使用的基于模板的软件Modeller的性能。我们从蛋白质数据库收集了实验确定的73个GPCRs的结构。官方AlphaFold存储库和RoseTTAFold网络服务与默认设置一起使用,以预测每个蛋白质序列的五个结构。然后将预测的模型与实验求解的结构对齐,并通过均方根偏差(RMSD)度量进行评估。如果只看每个程序得分最高的结构,Modeller的平均建模RMSD最小,为2.17µ,比AlphaFold的5.53和RoseTTAFold的6.28好,可能是因为Modeller已经包含了许多已知的结构作为模板。然而,基于神经网络的方法(AlphaFold和RoseTTAFold)在73例得分最高的模型中,有21例和15例优于建模者,分别,没有好的模板可用于Modeller。由基于NN的方法产生的较大的RMSD值主要是由于与晶体结构相比的环路预测的差异。
    Neural network (NN)-based protein modeling methods have improved significantly in recent years. Although the overall accuracy of the two non-homology-based modeling methods, AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold, is outstanding, their performance for specific protein families has remained unexamined. G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) proteins are particularly interesting since they are involved in numerous pathways. This work directly compares the performance of these novel deep learning-based protein modeling methods for GPCRs with the most widely used template-based software-Modeller. We collected the experimentally determined structures of 73 GPCRs from the Protein Data Bank. The official AlphaFold repository and RoseTTAFold web service were used with default settings to predict five structures of each protein sequence. The predicted models were then aligned with the experimentally solved structures and evaluated by the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) metric. If only looking at each program\'s top-scored structure, Modeller had the smallest average modeling RMSD of 2.17 Å, which is better than AlphaFold\'s 5.53 Å and RoseTTAFold\'s 6.28 Å, probably since Modeller already included many known structures as templates. However, the NN-based methods (AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold) outperformed Modeller in 21 and 15 out of the 73 cases with the top-scored model, respectively, where no good templates were available for Modeller. The larger RMSD values generated by the NN-based methods were primarily due to the differences in loop prediction compared to the crystal structures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近通过AlphaFold和RoseTTAFold等深度学习程序在蛋白质结构预测方面取得的突破肯定会在未来几十年彻底改变生物学。科学界才刚刚开始欣赏各种应用,这些蛋白质模型的优点和局限性。然而,在这场革命带来的第一次刺激之后,重要的是要评估所提出的模型的影响和它们的整体质量,以避免生物学家对这些模型的误解或过度解释。这些模型的第一个应用是解决X射线晶体学中根据衍射数据计算电子密度图时遇到的“相位问题”。的确,最常用的技术来得出电子密度图是分子置换。由于该技术依赖于与所研究蛋白质具有强烈结构相似性的蛋白质结构的知识,高精度模型的可用性对于成功的结构解决方案绝对至关重要。在收集2.45µ分辨率数据集后,我们为解决无义介导的mRNA衰变途径所涉及的蛋白质的晶体结构而奋斗了两年,一种mRNA质量控制途径,致力于消除带有过早终止密码子的真核mRNAs。我们使用了不同的方法(同构置换,异常衍射和分子置换)来确定这种结构,但一切都失败了,直到我们直接成功感谢AlphaFold和RoseTTAFold模型。这里,我们描述了这些新模型如何帮助我们解决这种结构,并得出结论,在我们的例子中,AlphaFold模型在很大程度上胜过其他模型。我们还讨论了搜索模型生成对于成功的分子替换的重要性。
    The breakthrough recently made in protein structure prediction by deep-learning programs such as AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold will certainly revolutionize biology over the coming decades. The scientific community is only starting to appreciate the various applications, benefits and limitations of these protein models. Yet, after the first thrills due to this revolution, it is important to evaluate the impact of the proposed models and their overall quality to avoid the misinterpretation or overinterpretation of these models by biologists. One of the first applications of these models is in solving the `phase problem\' encountered in X-ray crystallography in calculating electron-density maps from diffraction data. Indeed, the most frequently used technique to derive electron-density maps is molecular replacement. As this technique relies on knowledge of the structure of a protein that shares strong structural similarity with the studied protein, the availability of high-accuracy models is then definitely critical for successful structure solution. After the collection of a 2.45 Å resolution data set, we struggled for two years in trying to solve the crystal structure of a protein involved in the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway, an mRNA quality-control pathway dedicated to the elimination of eukaryotic mRNAs harboring premature stop codons. We used different methods (isomorphous replacement, anomalous diffraction and molecular replacement) to determine this structure, but all failed until we straightforwardly succeeded thanks to both AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold models. Here, we describe how these new models helped us to solve this structure and conclude that in our case the AlphaFold model largely outcompetes the other models. We also discuss the importance of search-model generation for successful molecular replacement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于人工智能(AI)的蛋白质结构数据库有望对药物发现产生影响。这里,我们展示了AlphaFold如何支持罕见疾病研究计划。我们专注于Alsin,一种导致罕见运动神经元疾病的蛋白质,如婴儿起病的上行遗传性痉挛性瘫痪(IAHSP)和青少年原发性侧索硬化症(JPLS),并参与了一些肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的病例。首先,我们比较了AlphaFoldDB人类Alsin模型与Alsin结构域的同源性模型。然后,我们评估了IAHSP患者中Alsin和实验表征的突变体的柔韧性。接下来,我们将负责其生理作用的二聚体/四聚体Alsin的初步模型与文献中报道的假设模型进行了比较。最后,我们建议进行候选药物测试的最佳动物模型。总的来说,我们通过计算表明,应该继续针对涉及Alsin的疾病的药物发现努力。
    Artificial intelligence (AI)-based protein structure databases are expected to have an impact on drug discovery. Here, we show how AlphaFold could support rare diseases research programs. We focus on Alsin, a protein responsible for rare motor neuron diseases, such as infantile-onset ascending hereditary spastic paralysis (IAHSP) and juvenile primary lateral sclerosis (JPLS), and involved in some cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). First, we compared the AlphaFoldDB human Alsin model with homology models of Alsin domains. We then evaluated the flexibility profile of Alsin and of experimentally characterized mutants present in patients with IAHSP. Next, we compared preliminary models of dimeric/tetrameric Alsin responsible for its physiological action with hypothetical models reported in the literature. Finally, we suggest the best animal model for drug candidates testing. Overall, we computationally show that drug discovery efforts toward Alsin-involving diseases should be pursued.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号