AST, aspartate aminotransferase

AST,天冬氨酸转氨酶
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近开发了NAFLD失代偿风险评分(Iowa模型),用于识别非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者发生肝脏事件的风险最高,使用三个变量-年龄,血小板计数,和糖尿病。
    我们对爱荷华州模型进行了外部验证,并将其与现有的非侵入性模型进行了比较。
    我们纳入了波士顿医疗中心的249名NAFLD患者,波士顿,马萨诸塞州,外部验证队列中的949例患者和内部/外部联合验证队列中的949例患者。主要结果是肝脏事件的发展(腹水,肝性脑病,食管或胃静脉曲张,或肝细胞癌)。我们使用Cox比例风险来分析Iowa模型在外部验证(https://uihc.org/非酒精性脂肪肝疾病失代偿风险评分计算器)中预测肝脏事件的能力。我们将爱荷华州模型的性能与AST与血小板比率指数(APRI)进行了比较,NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS),和合并队列中的FIB-4指数。
    Iowa模型显著预测了肝脏事件的发展,风险比为2.5[95%置信区间(CI)1.7-3.9,P<0.001],受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.87(CI0.83-0.91)。爱荷华州模型的AUROC(0.88,CI:0.85-0.92)与FIB-4指数(0.87,CI:0.83-0.91)相当,高于NFS(0.66,CI:0.63-0.69)和APRI(0.76,CI:0.73-0.79)。
    在城市,种族和种族不同的人口,Iowa模型在确定肝脏相关并发症风险较高的NAFLD患者方面表现良好.该模型提供发生肝脏事件的个体概率,并识别需要早期干预的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: The NAFLD decompensation risk score (the Iowa Model) was recently developed to identify patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) at highest risk of developing hepatic events using three variables-age, platelet count, and diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed an external validation of the Iowa Model and compared it to existing non-invasive models.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 249 patients with NAFLD at Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, in the external validation cohort and 949 patients in the combined internal/external validation cohort. The primary outcome was the development of hepatic events (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal or gastric varices, or hepatocellular carcinoma). We used Cox proportional hazards to analyze the ability of the Iowa Model to predict hepatic events in the external validation (https://uihc.org/non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-decompensation-risk-score-calculator). We compared the performance of the Iowa Model to the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), and the FIB-4 index in the combined cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: The Iowa Model significantly predicted the development of hepatic events with hazard ratio of 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.9, P < 0.001] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87 (CI 0.83-0.91). The AUROC of the Iowa Model (0.88, CI: 0.85-0.92) was comparable to the FIB-4 index (0.87, CI: 0.83-0.91) and higher than NFS (0.66, CI: 0.63-0.69) and APRI (0.76, CI: 0.73-0.79).
    UNASSIGNED: In an urban, racially and ethnically diverse population, the Iowa Model performed well to identify NAFLD patients at higher risk for liver-related complications. The model provides the individual probability of developing hepatic events and identifies patients in need of early intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是全球和印度慢性肝病的主要原因。在印度,NAFLD的负担已经很高,预计未来将与肥胖和2型糖尿病的持续流行同时进一步增加。鉴于NAFLD在社区中的高患病率,确定有进展性肝病风险的患者对于简化转诊和指导适当的管理至关重要.各种国际社会关于NAFLD的现有指南未能捕捉到印度NAFLD的整个景观,并且由于印度可用的社会文化方面和卫生基础设施的根本差异,通常难以纳入临床实践。自2015年印度全国NAFLD肝脏研究协会发表初始立场文件以来,NAFLD领域取得了很大进展。Further,关于NAFLD命名法的争论正在引起临床医师的过度混淆.随后的全面审查提供了基于共识的,关于命名法的指导声明,诊断,以及在印度环境中实际上可以实施的NAFLD治疗。
    Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of chronic liver disease globally and in India. The already high burden of NAFLD in India is expected to further increase in the future in parallel with the ongoing epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given the high prevalence of NAFLD in the community, it is crucial to identify those at risk of progressive liver disease to streamline referral and guide proper management. Existing guidelines on NAFLD by various international societies fail to capture the entire landscape of NAFLD in India and are often difficult to incorporate in clinical practice due to fundamental differences in sociocultural aspects and health infrastructure available in India. A lot of progress has been made in the field of NAFLD in the 7 years since the initial position paper by the Indian National Association for the Study of Liver on NAFLD in 2015. Further, the ongoing debate on the nomenclature of NAFLD is creating undue confusion among clinical practitioners. The ensuing comprehensive review provides consensus-based, guidance statements on the nomenclature, diagnosis, and treatment of NAFLD that are practically implementable in the Indian setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:FALCON1是非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)和3期纤维化患者pegbelfermin的IIb期研究。FALCON1事后分析旨在进一步评估pegbelfermin对NASH相关生物标志物的影响,组织学评估与非侵入性生物标志物之间的相关性,以及第24周组织学评估的主要终点反应和生物标志物之间的一致性。
    未经评估:基于血液的复合纤维化评分,基于血液的生物标志物,在基线至第24周,对具有来自FALCON1的可用数据的患者进行了成像生物标志物评估.SomaSignal测试评估了NASH脂肪变性的蛋白质特征,炎症,气球,和血液中的纤维化。线性混合效应模型适用于每种生物标志物。评估了血液生物标志物之间的相关性和一致性,成像,和组织学指标。
    UNASSIGNED:在第24周,pegbelfermin显着改善了基于血液的复合纤维化评分(ELF,FIB-4,APRI),纤维发生生物标志物(PRO-C3和PC3X),脂联素,CK-18,通过MRI-质子密度脂肪分数测量的肝脂肪分数,和所有四个SomaSignalNASH组件测试。组织学和非侵入性措施之间的相关性分析确定了四个主要类别:脂肪变性/代谢,组织损伤,纤维化,和基于活检的指标。pegbelfermin对主要终点的一致和不一致作用与观察到生物标志物反应;最明显和一致的影响是对肝脏脂肪变性和代谢的测量。在pegbelfermin臂中观察到组织学测量和通过成像测量的肝脂肪之间的显着关联。
    未经证实:Pegbelfermin通过改善肝脏脂肪变性最一致地改善NASH相关生物标志物,尽管组织损伤/炎症和纤维化的生物标志物也得到了改善。一致性分析显示,NASH的非侵入性评估支持并超过肝活检检测到的改善,提示在评估NASH治疗药物的疗效时,应更多地考虑现有的全部数据.
    未经评估:对NCT03486899的事后分析。
    未经批准:FALCON1是pegbelfermin与非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)无肝硬化患者的安慰剂;在这项研究中,对pegbelfermin治疗有反应的患者通过活检收集的组织样本中的肝纤维化检查进行鉴定。在目前的分析中,基于血液和成像的非侵入性纤维化措施,肝脏脂肪,和肝损伤被用来确定pegbelfermin治疗反应,看看他们如何与活检为基础的结果进行比较。我们发现许多非侵入性测试,尤其是那些测量肝脏脂肪的,确定了对pegbelfermin治疗有反应的患者,与肝活检结果一致。这些结果表明,使用来自非侵入性测试的数据可能有额外的价值,随着肝活检,评估NASH患者对治疗的反应。
    UNASSIGNED: FALCON 1 was a phase IIb study of pegbelfermin in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and stage 3 fibrosis. This FALCON 1 post hoc analysis aimed to further assess the effect of pegbelfermin on NASH-related biomarkers, correlations between histological assessments and non-invasive biomarkers, and concordance between the week 24 histologically assessed primary endpoint response and biomarkers.
    UNASSIGNED: Blood-based composite fibrosis scores, blood-based biomarkers, and imaging biomarkers were evaluated for patients with available data from FALCON 1 at baseline through week 24. SomaSignal tests assessed protein signatures of NASH steatosis, inflammation, ballooning, and fibrosis in blood. Linear mixed-effect models were fit for each biomarker. Correlations and concordance were assessed between blood-based biomarkers, imaging, and histological metrics.
    UNASSIGNED: At week 24, pegbelfermin significantly improved blood-based composite fibrosis scores (ELF, FIB-4, APRI), fibrogenesis biomarkers (PRO-C3 and PC3X), adiponectin, CK-18, hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-proton density fat fraction, and all four SomaSignal NASH component tests. Correlation analyses between histological and non-invasive measures identified four main categories: steatosis/metabolism, tissue injury, fibrosis, and biopsy-based metrics. Concordant and discordant effects of pegbelfermin on the primary endpoint vs. biomarker responses were observed; the most clear and concordant effects were on measures of liver steatosis and metabolism. A significant association between hepatic fat measured histologically and by imaging was observed in pegbelfermin arms.
    UNASSIGNED: Pegbelfermin improved NASH-related biomarkers most consistently through improvement of liver steatosis, though biomarkers of tissue injury/inflammation and fibrosis were also improved. Concordance analysis shows that non-invasive assessments of NASH support and exceed the improvements detected by liver biopsy, suggesting that greater consideration should be given to the totality of available data when evaluating the efficacy of NASH therapeutics.
    UNASSIGNED: Post hoc analysis of NCT03486899.
    UNASSIGNED: FALCON 1 was a study of pegbelfermin vs. placebo in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) without cirrhosis; in this study, patients who responded to pegbelfermin treatment were identified through examination of liver fibrosis in tissue samples collected through biopsy. In the current analysis, non-invasive blood- and imaging-based measures of fibrosis, liver fat, and liver injury were used to determine pegbelfermin treatment response to see how they compared with the biopsy-based results. We found that many of the non-invasive tests, particularly those that measured liver fat, identified patients who responded to pegbelfermin treatment, consistent with the liver biopsy findings. These results suggest that there may be additional value in using data from non-invasive tests, along with liver biopsy, to evaluate how well patients with NASH respond to treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:Efruxifermin已在非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)和F1-F3纤维化患者中显示出临床疗效。BALANCED队列C的主要目的是评估代偿性NASH肝硬化患者使用依fruxifermin的安全性和耐受性。
    UNASSIGNED:将NASH和4期纤维化患者(n=30)随机分为2:1,每周一次接受Efruxifermin50mg(n=20)或安慰剂(n=10),共16周。主要终点是依fruxifermin的安全性和耐受性。次要和探索性终点包括评估肝损伤和纤维化的非侵入性标志物,葡萄糖和脂质代谢,部分同意接受研究结束肝活检的患者的组织学变化。
    UNASSIGNED:Efruxifermin安全且耐受性良好;大多数不良事件(AE)为1级(n=7,23.3%)或2级(n=19,63.3%)。最常见的AE是胃肠道,包括瞬态,轻度至中度腹泻,和/或恶心。在肝损伤(丙氨酸氨基转移酶)以及葡萄糖和脂质代谢的关键标志物中发现了显着改善。efruxifermin治疗16周与包括Pro-C3在内的非侵入性纤维化标志物的显着减少相关(从基线[LSMCFB]-9μg/Lefruxiferminvs.-3.4μg/L安慰剂;p=0.0130)和ELF评分(-0.4efruxiferminvs.+0.4安慰剂;p=0.0036),具有降低肝脏硬度的趋势(LSMCBB-5.7kPaefruxifermin与-1.1kPa安慰剂;n.s.)。在16周后接受肝活检的12名依弗西敏治疗的患者中,4(33%)实现了至少一个阶段的纤维化改善,而NASH没有恶化,而另外3人(25%)获得了NASH的分辨率,与5例安慰剂治疗患者中的0例相比。
    未经证实:Efruxifermin表现出安全和良好的耐受性,在肝损伤标志物方面有令人鼓舞的改善,纤维化,和糖和脂质代谢后16周的治疗,保证在更大和更长期的研究中得到证实。
    未经批准:非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)引起的肝硬化,非酒精性脂肪性肝病的进行性形式,代表了重大的未满足的医疗需求。目前没有批准的用于治疗NASH的药物。这个概念证明是随机的,双盲临床试验表明,在NASH肝硬化患者中,与安慰剂相比,依弗西汀治疗具有潜在的治疗益处.
    未经评估:NCT03976401。
    UNASSIGNED: Efruxifermin has shown clinical efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and F1-F3 fibrosis. The primary objective of the BALANCED Cohort C was to assess the safety and tolerability of efruxifermin in patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with NASH and stage 4 fibrosis (n = 30) were randomized 2:1 to receive efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) once-weekly for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of efruxifermin. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included evaluation of non-invasive markers of liver injury and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and changes in histology in a subset of patients who consented to end-of-study liver biopsy.
    UNASSIGNED: Efruxifermin was safe and well-tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 (n = 7, 23.3%) or grade 2 (n = 19, 63.3%). The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal, including transient, mild to moderate diarrhea, and/or nausea. Significant improvements were noted in key markers of liver injury (alanine aminotransferase) and glucose and lipid metabolism. Sixteen-week treatment with efruxifermin was associated with significant reductions in non-invasive markers of fibrosis including Pro-C3 (least squares mean change from baseline [LSMCFB] -9 μg/L efruxifermin vs. -3.4 μg/L placebo; p = 0.0130) and ELF score (-0.4 efruxifermin vs. +0.4 placebo; p = 0.0036), with a trend towards reduced liver stiffness (LSMCFB -5.7 kPa efruxifermin vs. -1.1 kPa placebo; n.s.). Of 12 efruxifermin-treated patients with liver biopsy after 16 weeks, 4 (33%) achieved fibrosis improvement of at least one stage without worsening of NASH, while an additional 3 (25%) achieved resolution of NASH, compared to 0 of 5 placebo-treated patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Efruxifermin appeared safe and well-tolerated with encouraging improvements in markers of liver injury, fibrosis, and glucose and lipid metabolism following 16 weeks of treatment, warranting confirmation in larger and longer term studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Cirrhosis resulting from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, represents a major unmet medical need. Currently there are no approved drugs for the treatment of NASH. This proof-of-concept randomized, double-blind clinical trial demonstrated the potential therapeutic benefit of efruxifermin treatment compared to placebo in patients with cirrhosis due to NASH.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT03976401.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    稳定钙配方(SCF),具有关节护理潜力的功能性食物混合物,包含五个主要成分。然而,不能排除这些包含的成分之间不确定的交叉反应性。因此,重要的是要确保这种混合物的安全。在这项研究中,通过体外遗传毒性评估和大鼠28日口服毒性研究评估了SCF的安全性.细菌回复突变试验和哺乳动物染色体畸变试验表明,SCF没有诱导致突变性和致突变性。在大鼠中对SCF的28天重复剂量评估显示,在临床体征中没有死亡和不良反应。体重,尿液分析,血液学,器官重量,所有治疗组的组织病理学。尽管男性在最高剂量下观察到食物摄入量和血清生化参数的一些显着变化,它们与剂量无关,被认为在正常范围内.这些发现表明SCF不具有遗传毒性潜力,也没有亚急性毒性的明显证据。这些结果首次表明,在我们的实验条件下,SCF的遗传毒性和亚急性毒性是阴性的,并且SCF的未观察到的不良反应水平(NOAEL)可以定义为至少5470mg/kg/天。
    Steady-calcium formula (SCF), a functional food mixture with potential of joint care, contains five major ingredients. However, the uncertain cross-reactivity among these included ingredients cannot be excluded. Hence, it is important to ensure the safety of this mixture. In this study, the safety of SCF was evaluated through in vitro genotoxicity assessment and 28-day oral toxicity study in rats. The bacterial reverse mutation test and mammalian chromosome aberration test displayed that SCF did not induce mutagenicity and clastogenicity. The 28-day repeated dose assessment of SCF in rats revealed no mortality and adverse effects in clinical signs, body weight, urinalysis, hematology, organ weight, and histopathology at all treated groups. Although some significant changes were observed in food intake and parameters of serum biochemistry at the highest dose in males, they were not dose-related and considered to be within normal range. These findings indicate that SCF does not possess genotoxic potential and no obvious evidence of subacute toxicity. These results demonstrate for the first time that the genotoxicity and subacute toxicity for SCF are negative under our experimental conditions and the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of SCF may be defined as at least 5470 mg/kg/day.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于液体超负荷,维持性血液透析(MHD)患者的肝脏硬度(LS)可能会错误地升高。我们通过瞬时弹性成像(TE)测量了MHD患者成功肾移植前后的LS变化。
    MHD≥2年的成年人,没有肝纤维化或液体超负荷的额外危险因素,并计划进行肾移植。测量了两次LS,即,在移植前两周内(Tx前LS)和成功移植后≥3个月(Tx后LS)。Pre-TxLS≤7.0KPa和>7.0KPa的参与者被分为“I组”和“II组”,\"分别。分类和数字数据表示为比率/比例和平均值(SD),分别。
    分析了43名参与者(男性42[97.7%];年龄32[11]岁)的配对数据。整个队列的Tx前和Tx后LS,在间隔307(198)天测量,分别为8.5(7.3)千帕和6.7(3.1)千帕,分别。移植前,21名(49%)参与者属于第二组,22名(51%)属于第一组。在第二组参与者中,12(57%)在移植312(182)天后显示LS正常化。在第一组的22名与会者中,移植303(217)天后,有3例(13.6%)显示LS升高至>7.0KPa。整个队列中的平均LS变化,第二组,第一组是-1.8千帕,-4.1KPa,+0.2KPa,分别。
    MHD患者的LS可能被错误地升高,这很可能在成功的肾移植后恢复正常。
    UNASSIGNED: Liver stiffness (LS) may be falsely elevated in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) due to fluid overload. We measured LS change by transient elastography (TE) in MHD patients before and after successful renal transplantation.
    UNASSIGNED: Adults on ≥2 years of MHD, without additional risk factors for liver fibrosis or fluid overload, and planned for renal transplantation were prospectively recruited. LS was measured on two occasions, i.e., within two weeks before transplantation (pre-Tx LS) and after ≥ 3 months after successful transplantation (post-Tx LS). The participants with pre-Tx LS ≤ 7.0 KPa and >7.0 KPa were classified as \"Group I\" and \"Group II,\" respectively. Categorical and numerical data are expressed as ratio/proportions and mean (SD), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Paired data from 43 participants (males 42 [97.7%]; age 32 [11] years) were analyzed. The pre-Tx and post-Tx LS of the entire cohort, measured at 307 (198) days of interval, were 8.5 (7.3) KPa and 6.7 (3.1) KPa, respectively. Before transplantation, 21 (49%) participants belonged to Group II and 22 (51%) to Group I. Among the Group II participants, 12 (57%) showed LS normalization after 312 (182) days of transplantation. Of the 22 participants in Group I, three (13.6%) showed LS elevation to >7.0 KPa after 303 (217) days of transplantation. The mean LS changes among the overall cohort, Group II, and Group I were -1.8 KPa, -4.1 KPa, and +0.2 KPa, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: LS in people on MHD may be falsely elevated, which is likely to normalize after successful renal transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    未经证实:SARS-CoV-2会导致严重的急性呼吸道综合症,促使全球需要新的抗病毒治疗和支持治疗这种危及生命的病毒引起的器官衰竭。这项研究旨在帮助开发一种新的传统波斯医学(TPM)药物,并评估其在有主要症状的COVID-19患者中的有效性和安全性。
    UNASSIGNED:2022年2月,一项随机临床试验对德黑兰EmamReza(AJA)医院收治的160名确诊为COVID-19的患者进行了研究,伊朗。在他们住院期间,干预组接受了伊朗卫生和医学教育部(MOHME)批准的治疗方案,由伊朗方案组成,无花果;葡萄,红花,Cicerarietinum,Descurainiasophia种子,朱巴,鸡汤,大麦汤,玫瑰水,藏红花,还有肉桂香料.所有患者在人口统计学方面进行了比较,临床,和实验室变量。
    UNASSIGNED:将160例COVID-19患者分为干预组和对照组。在基线特征中,干预组与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。使用SPSS软件版本22,统计分析显示四个症状的显着差异:肌痛,弱点,头痛,咳嗽(p<0.05)。在5天的治疗期间,对照组C反应蛋白显著降低(p<0.05)。
    UNASSIGNED:虽然需要更多样本量更大的研究,拟议的组合似乎在治疗COVID-19患者的症状和炎症生物标志物如C反应蛋白方面有效.伊朗临床试验注册(IRCT)IRCT20220227054140N1。
    UNASSIGNED: SARS-CoV-2 causes severe acute respiratory syndrome prompting worldwide demand for new antiviral treatments and supportive care for organ failure caused by this life-threatening virus. This study aimed to help develop a new Traditional Persian Medicine (TPM) -based drug and assess its efficacy and safety in COVID-19 patients with major symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: In February 2022, a randomized clinical trial was conducted among 160 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to Emam Reza (AJA) Hospital in Tehran, Iran. During their hospitalization, the intervention group received a treatment protocol approved by Iran\'s Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME), consisting of an Iranian regimen, Ficus carica; Vitis vinifera, Safflower, Cicer arietinum, Descurainiasophia seeds, Ziziphus jujuba, chicken soup, barley soup, rose water, saffron, and cinnamon spices. All patients were compared in terms of demographics, clinical, and laboratory variables.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were divided into two groups: intervention and control. In baseline characteristics, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups (p>0.05). Using SPSS software version 22, statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in four symptoms: myalgia, weakness, headache, and cough (p<0.05). During the 5-day treatment period, the control group had significantly lower C-reactive protein (p<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: While more research with a larger sample size is needed, the proposed combination appears to be effective in the treatment of symptoms as well as inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein in COVID-19 patients.Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT) IRCT20220227054140N1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:诊断为2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的患者会出现胃肠道(GI)症状,有明确的证据表明SARS-CoV-2,致病病原体,感染胃肠道.在这个大的,多中心队列研究,我们评估了整个美国(美国)COVID-19的胃肠道和肝脏表现的变化。
    未经批准:在美国7个学术中心确定了2020年10月之前COVID-19检测阳性的住院患者。人口统计,出现症状,实验室数据,并提取住院结局。描述性和回归分析用于评估GI表现及其潜在预测因素。
    未经证实:在2031例COVID-19住院患者中,有18.9%的患者出现消化道症状;腹泻是最常见的(15.2%),其次是恶心和/或呕吐(12.6%)和腹痛(6.0%)。胃肠道症状在西部队列(16.0%)中的发生率低于东北队列(25.6%)和中西部队列(26.7%)。与非重症监护病房(ICU)患者相比,ICU患者天门冬氨酸转氨酶异常患病率较高(58.1%vs37.3%;P<0.01),丙氨酸转氨酶(37.5%vs29.3%;P=0.01),和总胆红素(12.7%vs9.0%;P<0.01)。ICU患者的死亡率也较高(22.7%vs4.7%;P<0.01)。慢性肝病与胃肠道症状的发展有关。天冬氨酸转氨酶或丙氨酸转氨酶异常与ICU入院风险增加相关。
    未经批准:我们介绍了全美最大的多中心COVID-19患者队列。尽管在美国各地的患病率和预测因素存在显着差异,但在COVID-19住院患者中,胃肠道表现很常见。
    UNASSIGNED: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms occur among patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and there is clear evidence that SARS-CoV-2, the causative pathogen, infects the GI tract. In this large, multicenter cohort study, we evaluated variations in gastrointestinal and hepatic manifestations of COVID-19 throughout the United States (US).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients hospitalized with a positive COVID-19 test prior to October 2020 were identified at 7 US academic centers. Demographics, presenting symptoms, laboratory data, and hospitalization outcomes were abstracted. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to evaluate GI manifestations and their potential predictors.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 2031 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, GI symptoms were present in 18.9%; diarrhea was the most common (15.2%), followed by nausea and/or vomiting (12.6%) and abdominal pain (6.0%). GI symptoms were less common in the Western cohort (16.0%) than the Northeastern (25.6%) and Midwestern (26.7%) cohorts. Compared to nonintensive care unit (ICU) patients, ICU patients had a higher prevalence of abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (58.1% vs 37.3%; P < .01), alanine aminotransferase (37.5% vs 29.3%; P = .01), and total bilirubin (12.7% vs 9.0%; P < .01). ICU patients also had a higher mortality rate (22.7% vs 4.7%; P < .01). Chronic liver disease was associated with the development of GI symptoms. Abnormal aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase was associated with an increased risk of ICU admission.
    UNASSIGNED: We present the largest multicenter cohort of patients with COVID-19 across the United States. GI manifestations were common among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, although there was significant variability in prevalence and predictors across the United States.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    晚期肝细胞癌是一个异质性群体,治疗选择有限。TACE最近被各种研究小组提倡。这项研究的目的是评估TACE联合索拉非尼,以及单独的TACE,治疗BCLCC期HCC安全有效。
    对78例BCLCC期HCC患者的临床数据进行回顾性评估,这些患者接受TACE-索拉非尼(TS)联合治疗或TACE单药治疗作为其首次治疗。干预后1个月比较两组肿瘤的放射学反应。比较两组患者的进展时间(TTP),总生存期(OS),和不良事件。
    疾病控制率(44.9%和25.8%,分别,治疗1个月后,TS组合组的P=0.09)高于TACE单药治疗组。TS联合组TTP和OS明显优于TACE组(TTP分别为4.6和3.1个月,分别,P=0.001),OS分别为10.1和7.8个月,分别,P<0.001)。TACE-S组在6个月时的累积生存时间更长,9个月,和1年比TACE组(97.9%,51.1%,25.7%与90.4%,51.6%,0%,分别)。
    TS联合治疗晚期(BCLC-C)HCC可显着提高疾病控制率,TTP,和操作系统与单独的TACE相比,没有任何显著增加的不良反应。
    UNASSIGNED: Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma is a heterogeneous group with limited treatment options. TACE has been advocated recently by various study groups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if TACE in combination with sorafenib, as well as TACE alone, was safe and efficacious in treating BCLC stage C HCC.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective evaluation of the clinical data of 78 patients with BCLC stage C HCC who received either TACE-sorafenib (TS) combination therapy or TACE monotherapy as their first treatment was done. The two groups were compared in terms of radiological tumor response 1 month after the intervention. The two groups were also compared in terms of time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: The disease control rate (44.9% and 25.8%, respectively, P = 0.09) was higher in the TS combination group than in the TACE monotherapy group after 1 month of treatment. The TS combination group had significantly superior TTP and OS than the TACE group (TTP was 4.6 and 3.1 months, respectively, P = 0.001), and OS was 10.1 and 7.8 months, respectively, P < 0.001). The TACE-S group had a greater cumulative survival time at 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year than the TACE group (97.9%, 51.1%, 25.7% vs. 90.4%, 51.6%, and 0%, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: TS combination therapy in advanced-stage (BCLC-C) HCC significantly improved disease control rate, TTP, and OS compared with TACE alone, without any significant increase in adverse reactions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有低血糖指数(GI)的完全营养饮料提供营养支持并预防高血糖。本研究确定了GI和预测个体对新的完全营养饮料的葡萄糖反应的因素。在18名健康志愿者(FPG<100mg/dl)中进行随机交叉对照试验。含有逆行淀粉的全营养饮料,葡萄糖溶液和白面包以随机顺序分配,间隔14天。从基线到食用每种食物后180分钟测量血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素水平。结果表明,以葡萄糖和白面包为参考,调整后的饮料GI分别为48.2±10.4和46.7±12.7,分别。虽然饮料具有低GI(<55),个体葡萄糖反应不同(GI:7-149)。比较个别GI<55(n=12)和GI≥55(n=6)组的特征显示,低GI组的基线胰岛素明显更高(14.86±16.51μIU/ml与4.9±3.4μIU/ml,P<0·05)。相关矩阵仅证实个体GI<55的两个预测因素是基线胰岛素(r=0·5,P=0·03)和HOMA-IR(r=0·55,P=0·02)。ROC曲线显示空腹胰岛素高于1.6μIU/ml,HOMA-IR高于1.05作为临界值。研究结果表明,完全营养饮料具有低GI,但个体反应存在很大差异,部分原因是空腹胰岛素水平和HOMA-IR.可以鼓励筛选空腹胰岛素和HOMA-IR以最大化饮料的功能益处。
    Complete nutrition drinks with a low glycemic index (GI) provide nutritional support and prevent hyperglycaemia. The present study identified GI and factors predicting individual glucose response to a new complete nutrition drink. A randomised cross-over controlled trial was conducted in eighteen healthy volunteers (FPG < 100 mg/dl). Complete nutrition drinks containing retrograded starch, glucose solution and white bread were assigned in a random sequence with 14-day wash-out intervals. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured from baseline to 180 min after consuming each food. Results show the adjusted GIs of the drink was 48.2 ± 10.4 and 46.7 ± 12.7 with glucose and white bread as the reference, respectively. While the drink has low GI (<55), the individual glucose responses varied (GI: 7-149). Comparing characters in individual GI < 55 (n = 12) and GI ≥ 55 (n = 6) groups revealed significantly higher baseline insulin in the low GI group (14.86 ± 16.51 μIU/ml v. 4.9 ± 3.4 μIU/ml, P < 0·05). The correlation matrix confirms only two predictive factors for having individual GI <55 were baseline insulin (r = 0·5, P = 0·03) and HOMA-IR (r = 0·55, P = 0·02). ROC curve reveals fasting insulin above 1.6 μIU/ml and HOMA-IR above 1.05 as the cut-off values. The findings suggest that the complete nutrition drink has a low GI, but there was wide variability in individual responses partly explained by fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR. Screening for fasting insulin and HOMA-IR may be encouraged to maximise the functional benefit of the drink.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号